DOCSLIB.ORG

Union Calendar No. 852 115Th Congress, 2D Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Report 115–1100

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 Union Calendar No. 852 115th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Report 115–1100 REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES FOR THE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS DECEMBER 21, 2018.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 33–917 WASHINGTON : 2018 VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:03 Jan 05, 2019 Jkt 033917 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR1100.XXX HR1100 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTS E:\Seals\Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS WILLIAM M. ‘‘MAC’’ THORNBERRY, Texas, Chairman WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina ADAM SMITH, Washington JOE WILSON, South Carolina ROBERT A. BRADY, Pennsylvania FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey SUSAN A. DAVIS, California ROB BISHOP, Utah JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio RICK LARSEN, Washington MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JIM COOPER, Tennessee BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado NIKI TSONGAS, Massachusetts ROBERT J. WITTMAN, Virginia JOHN GARAMENDI, California MIKE COFFMAN, Colorado JACKIE SPEIER, California VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri MARC A. VEASEY, Texas AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii MO BROOKS, Alabama BETO O’ROURKE, Texas PAUL COOK, California DONALD NORCROSS, New Jersey BRADLEY BYRNE, Alabama RUBEN GALLEGO, Arizona SAM GRAVES, Missouri SETH MOULTON, Massachusetts ELISE M. STEFANIK, New York COLLEEN HANABUSA, Hawaii MARTHA MCSALLY, Arizona CAROL SHEA–PORTER, New Hampshire STEPHEN KNIGHT, California JACKY ROSEN, Nevada STEVE RUSSELL, Oklahoma A. DONALD MCEACHIN, Virginia SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee SALUD O. CARBAJAL, California RALPH LEE ABRAHAM, Louisiana ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland TRENT KELLY, Mississippi STEPHANIE N. MURPHY, Florida MIKE GALLAGHER, Wisconsin RO KHANNA, California MATT GAETZ, Florida TOM O’HALLERAN, Arizona DON BACON, Nebraska THOMAS R. SUOZZI, New York JIM BANKS, Indiana JIMMY PANETTA, California LIZ CHENEY, Wyoming JODY B. HICE, Georgia PAUL MITCHELL, Michigan JEN STEWART, Staff Director ZACH STEACY, Director, Legislative Operations (II) VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:03 Jan 05, 2019 Jkt 033917 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\HR\OC\HR1100.XXX HR1100 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, Washington, DC, December 21, 2018. Hon. KAREN L. HAAS, Clerk of the House of Representatives, Washington, DC. DEAR MS. HAAS: Pursuant to clause 1(d) of rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives, I present herewith the report on the activities of the Committee on Armed Services for the 115th Congress. Sincerely, WILLIAM M. ‘‘MAC’’ THORNBERRY, Chairman. (III) VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:03 Jan 05, 2019 Jkt 033917 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 7633 Sfmt 7633 E:\HR\OC\HR1100.XXX HR1100 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTS VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:03 Jan 05, 2019 Jkt 033917 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 7633 Sfmt 7633 E:\HR\OC\HR1100.XXX HR1100 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTS C O N T E N T S Page Powers and Duties ................................................................................................... 1 Committee Rules ...................................................................................................... 04 Composition of the Committee on Armed Services ............................................... 17 Committee Staff ....................................................................................................... 23 Committee Meetings and Hearings ........................................................................ 25 Legislative Activities ............................................................................................... 26 Oversight Activities ................................................................................................. 35 Publications .............................................................................................................. 127 (V) VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:40 Jan 08, 2019 Jkt 033917 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\HR\OC\HR1100.XXX HR1100 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTS VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:40 Jan 08, 2019 Jkt 033917 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\HR\OC\HR1100.XXX HR1100 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTS Union Calendar No. 852 115TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 115–1100 REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES FOR THE 115TH CONGRESS DECEMBER 21, 2018.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. THORNBERRY, from the Committee on Armed Services, submitted the following R E P O R T POWERS AND DUTIES Background The House Committee on Armed Services, a standing committee of Congress, was established on January 2, 1947, as a part of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 812), by merging the Committees on Military Affairs and Naval Affairs. The Com- mittees on Military Affairs and Naval Affairs were established in 1882. In 1885, jurisdiction over military and naval appropriations was taken from the Committee on Appropriations and given to the Committees on Military Affairs and Naval Affairs, respectively. This practice continued until July 1, 1920, when jurisdiction over all appropriations was again placed in the Committee on Appro- priations. In the 93rd Congress, following a study by the House Select Committee on Committees, the House passed H. Res. 988, the Committee Reform Amendments of 1974, to be effective January 3, 1975. As a result of those amendments, the jurisdictional areas of the Committee on Armed Services remained essentially unchanged. However, oversight functions were amended to require each stand- ing committee to review and study on a continuing basis all mat- ters and jurisdiction of the committee. Also, the Committee on Armed Services was to review and study on a continuing basis all laws, programs, and Government activities dealing with or involv- VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:03 Jan 05, 2019 Jkt 033917 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR1100.XXX HR1100 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTS 2 ing international arms control and disarmament and the education of military dependents in school. The rules changes adopted by the House (H. Res. 5) on January 4, 1977, placed new responsibilities in the field of atomic energy in the Committee on Armed Services. Those responsibilities involved the national security aspects of atomic energy previously within the jurisdiction of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy. Public Law 95–110, effective September 20, 1977, abolished the Joint Com- mittee on Atomic Energy. With the adoption of H. Res. 658 on July 14, 1977, which estab- lished the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the jurisdiction of the Committee on Armed Service over intelligence matters was changed. That resolution gave the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence oversight responsibilities for intelligence and intelligence-related activities and programs of the U.S. Govern- ment. Specifically, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has exclusive legislative jurisdiction regarding the Central Intel- ligence Agency and the director of Central Intelligence, including authorizations. Also, legislative jurisdiction over all intelligence and intelligence-related activities and programs was vested in the permanent select committee except that other committees with a jurisdictional interest may request consideration of any such mat- ters. Accordingly, as a matter of practice, the Committee on Armed Services shared jurisdiction over the authorization process involv- ing intelligence-related activities. The committee continues to have shared jurisdiction over mili- tary intelligence activities as set forth in rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives. With the adoption of House rules (H. Res. 5) on January 4, 1995, the Committee on National Security was established as the suc- cessor committee to the Committee on Armed Services, and was granted additional legislative and oversight authority over mer- chant marine academies, national security aspects of merchant ma- rine policy and programs, and interoceanic canals. Rules for the 104th Congress also codified the existing jurisdiction of the com- mittee over tactical intelligence matters and the intelligence re- lated activities of the Department of Defense. On January 6, 1999, the House adopted H. Res. 5, rules for the 106th Congress, in which the Committee on National Security was redesignated as the Committee on Armed Services. On January 5, 2012, the House adopted H. Res. 5, rules for the 112th Congress, which clarified the Committee on Armed Services jurisdiction over Department of Defense administered cemeteries. Constitutional Powers and Duties The powers and duties of Congress in relation to national defense matters stem from Article I, section 8 of the United States Con- stitution, which provides, among other things that Congress shall have power: To raise and support Armies; To provide and maintain a Navy; To make rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; To provide for calling forth the Militia; VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:03 Jan 05, 2019 Jkt 033917 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR1100.XXX HR1100 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTS 3 To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed
Recommended publications
  • Ronald V. Dellums Fair Chance Access to Housing Ordinance; Adding BMC Chapter 13.106

    Ronald V. Dellums Fair Chance Access to Housing Ordinance; Adding BMC Chapter 13.106

    Page 1 of 37 Office of the Mayor ACTION CALENDAR March 10, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Mayor Jesse Arreguín, Councilmembers Cheryl Davila, Kate Harrison, Ben Bartlett Subject: Ronald V. Dellums Fair Chance Access to Housing Ordinance; Adding BMC Chapter 13.106 RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt a first reading of the Ronald V. Dellums Fair Chance Access to Housing Ordinance, adding Berkeley Municipal Code Chapter 13.106 and; 2. Direct the City Manager to take all necessary steps to implement this chapter including but not limited to developing administrative regulations in consultation with all relevant City Departments including the Rent Stabilization Board, preparing an annual implementation budget, designating hearing officers and other necessary staffing for administrative complaint, exploring the development of a compliance testing program similar to that used by the Seattle Office of Civil Rights, developing timelines and procedures for complaints, conducting outreach and education in partnership with the Alameda County Fair Chance Housing Coalition, and referring program costs to the June budget process. POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION On November 7, 2019, the Land Use, Housing, and Economic Development Committee adopted the following action: M/S/C (Droste/Hahn) to move the item with amendments and subject to additional technical revisions with a positive recommendation. Vote: All Ayes. BACKGROUND The City of Berkeley, along with other California urban areas, has seen an unprecedented increase in homelessness, with dire public health and safety consequences. This proposed Fair Chance Housing Ordinance serves as critical strategy to house currently unhoused people and also prevent more people from becoming homeless.
  • Half of Americans Approve of the Job President Biden Is Doing, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Most Say Conspiracy Theories in the U.S

    Half of Americans Approve of the Job President Biden Is Doing, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Most Say Conspiracy Theories in the U.S

    Tim Malloy, Polling Analyst (203) 645-8043 Doug Schwartz, Associate Vice President and Director (203) 582-5294 FOR RELEASE: FEBRUARY 17, 2021 HALF OF AMERICANS APPROVE OF THE JOB PRESIDENT BIDEN IS DOING, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS; MOST SAY CONSPIRACY THEORIES IN THE U.S. ARE OUT OF CONTROL Four weeks after being sworn into office, President Joe Biden receives a positive job approval rating as Americans approve 50 – 38 percent, with 13 percent not offering an opinion, according to a Quinnipiac (KWIN- uh-pe-ack) University national poll of 1,056 adults released today. This is little changed from February 3rd when Americans approved 49 – 36 percent, with 16 percent not offering an opinion. There are sharp partisan divides with Democrats approving 91 – 2 percent and independents approving 50 – 34 percent, while Republicans disapprove 82 – 11 percent. When only considering registered voters, Biden’s job approval is 52 – 38 percent. It is nearly the inverse of former President Trump’s negative 38 – 55 percent job approval rating at roughly the same period during his presidency in a February 22, 2017 poll. “One month in, these are solid, but not particularly dazzling approval numbers for the new president. There may be some solace in the knowledge that his predecessor spent four years in office without getting very close to 50 percent,” said Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy. Americans approve 58 – 32 percent of the way Biden is handling the response to the coronavirus. On his handling of the economy, they approve 48 – 39 percent. When it comes to the Biden administration’s handling of the reopening of schools, the public is mixed with 42 percent approving, 38 percent disapproving, and 20 percent not offering an opinion.
  • Jewish Historical Studies Transactions of the Jewish Historical Society of England

    Jewish Historical Studies Transactions of the Jewish Historical Society of England

    Jewish Historical Studies Transactions of the Jewish Historical Society of England Editorial: Introduction: Setbacks and shocks to the system: adjustments and particularly painful losses Michael Berkowitz1,* How to cite: Berkowitz, M. ‘Introduction: Setbacks and shocks to the system: adjustments and particularly painful losses’. Jewish Historical Studies, 2021, 52(1), pp. xi-xix. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.jhs.2021v52.001. Published: 03 June 2021 Peer Review: This article has been peer reviewed through the journal’s standard editorial peer review. Copyright: © 2020, The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.jhs.2021v52.001 Open Access: Jewish Historical Studies is a peer-reviewed open access journal. *Correspondence: [email protected] 1UCL, UK https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.jhs.2021v52.001 introduction Setbacks and shocks to the system: adjustments and particularly painful losses The previous issue of Transactions, volume 51, largely comprised articles originating in a London conference about the Kindertransport (January 2019) – the migration to Britain of nearly ten thousand (mostly) Jewish children, in the wake of “the Night of the Broken Glass” in Nazi Germany, November 1938, to the outbreak of the Second World War. In February 2019, the colleagues who initiated that conference, Lesley Urbach and Jennifer Craig-Norton of Southampton University, along with Susan Cohen, approached me with the idea of hosting a related meeting on the history of internment.
  • Beyond the Beltway: Influencing Federal Policy Through Grassroots Engagement

    Beyond the Beltway: Influencing Federal Policy Through Grassroots Engagement

    Beyond the Beltway: Influencing Federal Policy through Grassroots Engagement GMA Annual Convention 2019 Welcome and Goals for Today • Learn about importance of federal issues and how city officials can influence federal policy • Overview of Georgia’s delegation • Facts about Congress and the legislative process • GMA Federal Advocacy • Apply concepts to practical situations • Empower you to talk to federal leaders Group feedback: What are the top two things you would like to learn today? 1 Federal Advocacy: Why is it important? • Federal issues impact cities • Break through Beltway thinking – put a local face on issues • Continuous exchange of ideas and local examples • Strengthen relationships to guide decision making Trust in Government Pew Research Center, November 2015 Poll Gallup, September 2016 Trust & confidence in: • Congress: 35% • State government: 62% • Local government: 71% Congress: An Overview •116th Congress • 435 House Members • 100 Senators • Republicans have 53-seat majority in Senate (45 Dem, 2 Independent) • Democrats have 235-197 seat majority in House (3 vacancies) 2 Congress: An Overview • Salary –Base salary for House and Senate is $174,000 –House speaker gets $223,500 –Average pay for congressional staff is $30-50,000 • Personnel allowance –The average allowance for personnel in the Senate is $3,306,570; –House members are allowed $944,671 for personnel plus office expenses Congress: An Overview Prior Occupations of 116th Prior Occupations of 116th Representatives Congress Senators Congress (2019) (2019) Public
  • Big Business and Conservative Groups Helped Bolster the Sedition Caucus’ Coffers During the Second Fundraising Quarter of 2021

    Big Business and Conservative Groups Helped Bolster the Sedition Caucus’ Coffers During the Second Fundraising Quarter of 2021

    Big Business And Conservative Groups Helped Bolster The Sedition Caucus’ Coffers During The Second Fundraising Quarter Of 2021 Executive Summary During the 2nd Quarter Of 2021, 25 major PACs tied to corporations, right wing Members of Congress and industry trade associations gave over $1.5 million to members of the Congressional Sedition Caucus, the 147 lawmakers who voted to object to certifying the 2020 presidential election. This includes: • $140,000 Given By The American Crystal Sugar Company PAC To Members Of The Caucus. • $120,000 Given By Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s Majority Committee PAC To Members Of The Caucus • $41,000 Given By The Space Exploration Technologies Corp. PAC – the PAC affiliated with Elon Musk’s SpaceX company. Also among the top PACs are Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, and the National Association of Realtors. Duke Energy and Boeing are also on this list despite these entity’s public declarations in January aimed at their customers and shareholders that were pausing all donations for a period of time, including those to members that voted against certifying the election. The leaders, companies and trade groups associated with these PACs should have to answer for their support of lawmakers whose votes that fueled the violence and sedition we saw on January 6. The Sedition Caucus Includes The 147 Lawmakers Who Voted To Object To Certifying The 2020 Presidential Election, Including 8 Senators And 139 Representatives. [The New York Times, 01/07/21] July 2021: Top 25 PACs That Contributed To The Sedition Caucus Gave Them Over $1.5 Million The Top 25 PACs That Contributed To Members Of The Sedition Caucus Gave Them Over $1.5 Million During The Second Quarter Of 2021.
  • Ibew Local Union 26 2020 Election Endorsements

    Ibew Local Union 26 2020 Election Endorsements

    IBEW LOCAL UNION 26 2020 ELECTION ENDORSEMENTS The Local 26 staff and the many activist members of our Union have met, interviewed, and questioned nu- merous candidates on both sides of the ballot. We have offered an olive branch to all candidates, in all parties. In some election races, neither candidate received our support. Our endorsements went only to those candidates who best served the members of Local 26, our families, and our future. Please use this endorsement list as a guide when casting your ballot. If you have any questions about registering, voting, ballot initiatives, or candi- dates please contact Tom Clark at 301-459-2900 Ext. 8804 or [email protected] US President/Vice President Joe Biden and Kamala Harris Maryland US House District 2: Dutch Ruppersberger US House District 3: John Sarbanes US House District 4: Anthony Brown US House District 5: Steny Hoyer US House District 6: David Trone US House District 7: Kweisi Mfume US House District 8: Jamie Raskin Question 1: YES Montgomery County Question A: For Question B: Against District of Columbia US House: Eleanor Holmes Norton DC Council at-large: Ed Lazere DC Council at-large: Robert White DC Council Ward 2: Brooke Pinto DC Council Ward 4: Janeese Lewis George DC Council Ward 7: Vincent Gray DC Council Ward 8: Trayon “Ward Eight” White Virginia US House District 1: Qasim Rashid US House District 2: Elaine Luria US House District 3: Bobby Scott US House District 4: Donald McEachin US House District 5: Dr. Cameron Webb US House District 7: Abigail Spanberger US House District 8: Don Beyer US House District 10: Jennifer Wexton US House District 11: Gerald Connolly Arlington Co Board Supervisors: Libby Garvey House of Delegates District 29: Irina Khanin Frederick County Board of Supervisors, Shawnee District: Richard Kennedy Luray Town Council: Leah Pence.
  • Farm & Ranch Votes Matter

    Farm & Ranch Votes Matter

    NEBRASKA FARM BUREAU TICKET FARM & RANCH VOTES MATTER YOUR GUIDE TO NEFB'S FRIENDS OF AGRICULTURE ELECTION DAY IS TUESDAY, NOV. 6, 2018 5225 S. 16th St., P.O. Box 80299, Lincoln, NE 68501 | (800) 742-4016 | (402) 421-4400 | www.nefb.org NEBRASKA FARM BUREAU TICKET Vote for Nebraska Farm Bureau “Friends of Agriculture" Election Day is just a few weeks away. on agricultural issues, qualifications and state. He supports the growth of Nebraska’s University of Nebraska Board of Regents. On Tuesday Nov. 6, farmers and ranchers previous experience, communication abilities, ethanol industry; he has pushed back against “We are very impressed with the level of will have an opportunity to vote and have a and the ability to represent their district. overreaching federal regulations, including awareness demonstrated by these candidates clear say in what they want for the future of This year, the NEFB-PAC designated the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) about the importance of agriculture to our Country. 27 candidates as “Friends of Agriculture.” and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers “Waters Nebraska,” McHargue said. “They all “Too often, politicians play a numbers Among the offices designated were all four of the U.S.” rule; he has backed initiatives exhibited a positive statewide perspective on game and overlook the rural vote. They incumbent U.S. congressional candidates: to expand broadband; he has worked with issues affecting farmers and ranchers and a choose instead to spend their time and Senator Deb Fischer, as well as Congressmen the agriculture community and state officials desire to work on expanding agriculture in an resources in urban areas, saying that our Jeff Fortenberry, Don Bacon, and Adrian to work through rules and regulations effort to grow our state’s economy,” he said.
  • Extensions of Remarks E4 HON. MO BROOKS HON

    Extensions of Remarks E4 HON. MO BROOKS HON

    E4 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks January 7, 2014 Mr. Stephen Krupicka, the Comanche HONORING A–10 PILOTS BRIGADIER and greater individual attention from profes- Marching Band director, should be honored for GENERAL MACKEY AND LIEU- sors and coaches. It is through this winning such extraordinary commitment to these stu- TENANT COLONEL ROE formula that Grand View University has posi- dents, leading the band to such an out- tioned itself among our state’s premier univer- standing victory. To the members of the band, HON. VICKY HARTZLER sities. Mr. Speaker, the pride and excitement that Congratulations on a job well done! Your hard OF MISSOURI this team has brought to their campus and to work and dedication certainly paid off. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES It should also be noted that I am nominating the state of Iowa cannot be understated. The Tuesday, January 7, 2014 the Comanche Marching Band to perform at unrelenting commitment of these coaches and the National Memorial Day Concert Series in Mrs. HARTZLER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today players speaks volumes about the Iowa work Washington, D.C. in May, 2014. The concert to recognize the brave airmen of the 442d ethic and the rewards of working together. It is series will commemorate the 70th Anniversary Fighter Wing of Whiteman Air Force Base. truly an honor to represent the players, coach- of D-Day May 24th-26th. Specifically, I want to commend the A–10 es and families of this team in the United States Congress and I invite my colleagues in Again, Congratulations to the Shiner High pilots who courageously protected Sergeant the House of Representatives to join me in School Marching Band.
  • Newly Elected Representatives in the 114Th Congress

    Newly Elected Representatives in the 114Th Congress

    Newly Elected Representatives in the 114th Congress Contents Representative Gary Palmer (Alabama-6) ....................................................................................................... 3 Representative Ruben Gallego (Arizona-7) ...................................................................................................... 4 Representative J. French Hill (Arkansas-2) ...................................................................................................... 5 Representative Bruce Westerman (Arkansas-4) .............................................................................................. 6 Representative Mark DeSaulnier (California-11) ............................................................................................. 7 Representative Steve Knight (California-25) .................................................................................................... 8 Representative Peter Aguilar (California-31) ................................................................................................... 9 Representative Ted Lieu (California-33) ........................................................................................................ 10 Representative Norma Torres (California-35) ................................................................................................ 11 Representative Mimi Walters (California-45) ................................................................................................ 12 Representative Ken Buck (Colorado-4) .........................................................................................................
  • CDIR-2018-10-29-VA.Pdf

    CDIR-2018-10-29-VA.Pdf

    276 Congressional Directory VIRGINIA VIRGINIA (Population 2010, 8,001,024) SENATORS MARK R. WARNER, Democrat, of Alexandria, VA; born in Indianapolis, IN, December 15, 1954; son of Robert and Marge Warner of Vernon, CT; education: B.A., political science, George Washington University, 1977; J.D., Harvard Law School, 1980; professional: Governor, Commonwealth of Virginia, 2002–06; chairman of the National Governor’s Association, 2004– 05; religion: Presbyterian; wife: Lisa Collis; children: Madison, Gillian, and Eliza; committees: Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; Budget; Finance; Rules and Administration; Select Com- mittee on Intelligence; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 4, 2008; reelected to the U.S. Senate on November 4, 2014. Office Listings http://warner.senate.gov 475 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 .................................................. (202) 224–2023 Chief of Staff.—Mike Harney. Legislative Director.—Elizabeth Falcone. Communications Director.—Rachel Cohen. Press Secretary.—Nelly Decker. Scheduler.—Andrea Friedhoff. 8000 Towers Crescent Drive, Suite 200, Vienna, VA 22182 ................................................... (703) 442–0670 FAX: 442–0408 180 West Main Street, Abingdon, VA 24210 ............................................................................ (276) 628–8158 FAX: 628–1036 101 West Main Street, Suite 7771, Norfolk, VA 23510 ........................................................... (757) 441–3079 FAX: 441–6250 919 East Main Street, Richmond, VA 23219 ...........................................................................
  • May 11, 2020 the Honorable Elaine L. Chao Secretary of the Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 N

    May 11, 2020 the Honorable Elaine L. Chao Secretary of the Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 N

    May 11, 2020 The Honorable Elaine L. Chao Secretary of the Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary Chao, We write to bring your attention to the Port of Virginia's application to the 2020 Port Infrastructure Development Discretionary Grants Program to increase on-terminal rail capacity at their Norfolk International Terminals (NIT) facility in Norfolk, Virginia. If awarded, the funds will help increase safety, improve efficiency, and increase the reliability of the movement of goods. We ask for your full and fair consideration. The Port of Virginia is one of the Commonwealth's most powerful economic engines. On an annual basis, the Port is responsible for nearly 400,000 jobs and $92 billion in spending across our Commonwealth and generates 7.5% of our Gross State Product. The Port of Virginia serves as a catalyst for commerce throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia and beyond. To expand its commercial impact, the Port seeks to use this funding to optimize its central rail yard at NIT. The Port's arrival and departure of cargo by rails is the largest of any port on the East Coast, and the proposed optimization will involve the construction of two new rail bundles containing four tracks each for a total of more than 10,000 additional feet of working track. This project will improve efficiency, allow more cargo to move through the facility, improve the safety of operation, remove more trucks from the highways, and generate additional economic development throughout the region. The Port of Virginia is the only U.S.
  • Washington Update

    Washington Update

    WASHINGTON UPDATE A MONTHLY NEWSLETTER Vol 5 No 3 Published by the AUSA Institute of Land Warfare March 1993 PRESIDENT CLINTON'S ECONOMIC PLAN, ASPIN'S $10.8 BILLION BUDGET CUT hits the announced Feb. 17, calls for defense spending cuts of Army to the tune of $2.5 billion. The Army reportedly $127 billion in budget authority by 1997 from the pro­ met the Defense Secretary's Feb. 2 order to cut that posal of former President Bush. Details of just where the amount from a $64.1 billion proposed FY 1994 budget cuts will come must wait until release of the Clinton FY by offering to cancel a number of major weapons now in 1994 Defense budget-expected around the end of production or development and by accelerating the draw­ March. All that is known to date is that the President down of troops from Europe. How many of these will plans a 1.4 million active-duty force (vice Bush's 1.6 make it through the budget process is pure speculation at million); cuts the U.S. force in Europe to about 100,000, this point. The specific reductions won't be known until (Bush projected 150,000); freezes the SDI program at President Clinton sends his FY 1994 budget to Capitol $3.8 billion a year, (Bush saw $6.3 billion request for FY Hill (expected late March), but "Pentagon officials" have 1994 alone); and imposes a freeze on federal pay in­ commented in the media that the Army proposes to cut: creases in 1994 and limited raises thereafter.