DOCSLIB.ORG

Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update CITY OF OREGON CITY, OREGON PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2007 This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements CITY OF OREGON CITY, CITY COMMISSION Alice Norris, Mayor Daphne Wuest, Commissioner Trent Tidwell, Commissioner Damon Mabee, Commissioner Doug Neeley,Commissioner CITY OF OREGON CITY PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE Karen Andrews James “Marty” Bertsch Shawn Dachtler Havan Jones Dan Kromer Ted Schumaker Martha Sumption Lisa Wright-Wilson CITY OF OREGON CITY STAFF Larry Patterson, City Manager Scott Archer, Community Services Director Larry Potter, Parks & Cemetery Operations Manager Jim Row, Former Recreation Services Manager Denise Kai, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Kathy Wiseman, Pioneer Center Supervisor Rochelle Parsch, Aquatic & Recreation Supervisor CONSULTANT TEAM GreenPlay, LLC Design Concepts Geowest ETC/Leisure Vision For more information about this document, contact GreenPlay, LLC At: 3050 Industrial Lane, Suite 200, Broomfield, Colorado 80020, Telephone: 303-439-8369 Fax: 303-439-0628 Toll Free: 866-849-9959 Email: [email protected] Web: www.greenplayllc.com i Oregon City, Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................1 II. Past, Present, and Future – The Planning Context ...................................................................23 A. Vision and Mission................................................................................................................23 B. Purpose of this Plan ...............................................................................................................25 C. History of Oregon City Parks and Recreation...................................................................26 D. Community Services Department Overview ....................................................................27 E. Related Planning Efforts and Integration ...........................................................................29 F. Methodology of this Planning Process................................................................................29 G. Timeline for Completing the Master Plan..........................................................................30 III. What We Want - Our Community and Identified Needs......................................................31 A. Community Profile and Demographic Information.........................................................31 B. Current Park and Recreation Trends...................................................................................37 C. Community and Stakeholder Input ....................................................................................49 D. Statistically Valid Survey .....................................................................................................54 IV. What We Have Now – An Analysis of Programs and Spaces ..............................................82 A. Recreation Programs and Services......................................................................................82 B. Inventory .................................................................................................................................89 C. The GRASP® Level of Service Analysis.............................................................................92 D. Level of Service Capacity ...................................................................................................103 V. How We Manage - Findings on Administration and Funding...........................................106 A. Administrative, Budgetary, and Programming Analysis..............................................106 B. Alternative Funding Sources..............................................................................................114 C. Potential Funding Sources..................................................................................................115 D. Summary of Key Finance and Funding Findings...........................................................124 VI. Recommendations and Action Plans......................................................................................125 A. Recommendations...............................................................................................................126 B. Recommendation Cost Estimates ......................................................................................138 Oregon City, Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update ii List of Tables Table 1: Cost Estimates of Renovations and Additions ...............................................................10 Table 2: Cost Estimates of Improvements......................................................................................10 Table 3: Estimated Trail Costs for 2007 ..........................................................................................13 Table 4: Cost Estimates and Funding Sources for 2008-2012 Recommended Priorities..........20 Table 5: Race Comparisons for 2006 ...............................................................................................35 Table 6: Educational Attainment – 25 Years and Older (2000)....................................................35 Table 7: Housing Units (2006)..........................................................................................................36 Table 8: Top 10 Activities Ranked by 2004 National Participation Levels ................................38 Table 9: Selected Sports Ranked by Percent Change from 1999 to 2004....................................38 Table 10: 2004 vs. 1994 Selected Sports National Participation by Age Group ........................40 Table 11: 2004 vs. 1999 National Recreation Participation of Women in Selected Sports.......40 Table 12: Recreation Activities for Adults 55 and Older (2002)..................................................42 Table 13: Benchmarking – Parks and Trails...................................................................................44 Table 14: Benchmarking – Outdoor Facilities................................................................................45 Table 15: Benchmarking - Indoor Facilities....................................................................................47 Table 16: Benchmarking – Operating Budget................................................................................48 Table 17: Strengths of Oregon City’s Parks and Recreation........................................................86 Table 18: Weaknesses of Oregon City’s Parks and Recreation ..................................................87 Table 19: Opportunities for the Oregon City Community ..........................................................88 Table 20: Threats to the Oregon City Community........................................................................89 Table 21: Inventory Summary .........................................................................................................90 Table 22: Staffing Level Benchmark..............................................................................................106 Table 23: Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Budget Allocations..................................................................109 Table 24: Cost Recovery by Program Area ..................................................................................110 Table 25: Program Participation ....................................................................................................111 List of Figures Figure 1: Population Projections 2006 to 2011 .................................................................................4 Figure 2: Population Projections 2006 to 2011 ...............................................................................32 Figure 3: Population Age Distribution – Oregon City, Oregon (2006) .....................................33 Figure 4: Population Comparisons: Oregon City, State of Oregon, and US (2006)..................34 Figure 5: Household Income– Oregon City compared to Oregon State and the US (2006)....36 Figure 6: LOS Summary Sub-Area Analysis Matrix....................................................................97 Figure 7: Level of Service Capacities ............................................................................................105 Figure 8: Organizational Chart......................................................................................................108 iii Oregon City, Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update Appendices I. Survey Results Crosstabs A. By Household Size, Park Visitation, Program Participation B. By Paying Additional Maintenance Fees and Property Taxes C. By Years Lived in Oregon City, Household Type, Gender II. Oregon City Pool Assessment III. GRASP® Scoring Method IV. GRASP® Inventory Summary V. GRASP® Perspectives PERSPECTIVE A: GRASP® Inventory PERSPECTIVE B: GRASP® Analysis Sub-Areas PERSPECTIVE C: GRASP® Perspective – Walkable Access to All Components PERSPECTIVE D: GRASP® Perspective – Access to Indoor Components PERSPECTIVE E: GRASP® Perspective – Access to Outdoor Components PERSPECTIVE F: GRASP® Perspective – Access to Passive Components PERSPECTIVE G: GRASP® Perspective – Access to Active Components GRASP®- RECOMMENDATION PERSPECTIVE VI. Cost Recovery Pyramid Methodology VII. Grant Opportunities Related to Parks and Recreation VIII. Sample Partnership Policy IX. Sample Sponsorship Policy Oregon City, Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update iv I. Executive Summary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mcloughlin Promenade Project City of Oregon City, Oregon
    McLoughlin Promenade Project City of Oregon City, Oregon Nomination for APWA Public Works Project of the Year March 1, 2011 APWA PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT OF THE YEAR McLOUGHLIN PROMENADE CITY OF OREGON CITY, OREGON Table of Contents Nomination Form Supporting Documentation Project Description .............................................................................................................. Page 1 Schedule ............................................................................................................................. Page 2 Construction Management ................................................................................................... Page 3 Safety Performance ............................................................................................................. Page 3 Environmental Considerations ............................................................................................. Page 5 Community Relations .......................................................................................................... Page 6 Additional Considerations .................................................................................................... Page 7 Appendix A Project Location Map Appendix B Project Photographs Appendix C Project Recognition Public Works Project of the Year Award Nomination Form Deadline March 1, 2011 Primary Contractor (received, not postmarked) Project Name Name Title Project Completion Date Must be substantially completed (90%) and available for public use as Agency/Organization
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 66/Monday, April 7, 2014/Notices
    19122 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 66 / Monday, April 7, 2014 / Notices should be aware that your entire Dated: March 20, 2014. Old Main at the Lutheran Home at Topton, comment—including your personal J. Paul Loether, 1 S. Home Ave., Longswamp Township, 14000183 identifying information—may be made Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ publicly available at any time. While National Historic Landmarks Program. Philadelphia County you may ask us in your comment to COLORADO Happy Hollow Recreation Center, 4740 withhold your personal identifying Wayne Ave., Philadelphia, 14000184 Adams County information from public review, we TENNESSEE cannot guarantee that we will be able to Engelbrecht Farm, 2024 Strasburg Rd., do so. All comments will be made part Strasburg, 14000170 Knox County of the public record and will be CONNECTICUT Happy Holler Historic District (Knoxville and Knox County MPS), 1200–1209, 1211 N, electronically distributed to all Council Fairfield County members. Central St., 103,105 E. Anderson & 109, River Road—Mead Avenue Historic District, 115 W. Anderson Aves., Knoxville, Dated: March 28, 2014. Roughly along Mead Ave. & River Rd., 14000185 Alma Ripps, Greenwich, 14000171 A request for removal has been made for the following properties: Chief, Office of Policy. FLORIDA NORTH CAROLINA [FR Doc. 2014–07662 Filed 4–4–14; 8:45 am] Alachua County BILLING CODE 4310–WV–P Wake County Hawthorne Cemetery, FL 20, Hawthorne, 14000172 Merrimon House, 526 N. Wilmington St., Raleigh, 75001296 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEORGIA Pugh House, 10018 Chapel Hill Rd., Muscogee County Morrisville, 03000932 National Park Service Swift Manufacturing Company, 1410 6th WYOMING Ave., Columbus, 14000173 [NPS–WASO–NRNHL–15335; Teton County PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000] IOWA Leek’s Lodge, 10 mi.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Elevator the MUNICIPAL ELEVATOR 1915
    NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC PLACES Municipal Elevator THE MUNICIPAL ELEVATOR 1915 THE OREGON CITY MUNICIPAL ELEVATOR is a 130-foot-tall, public elevator tower rising from an underground tunnel in downtown Oregon City to connect with the city’s second level atop a bluff to the east. The elevator is a Modern, reinforced concrete structure designed by Gordon E. Trapp (1915-2009) of the engineering firm, Stevens & Thompson of Portland, Oregon. It was constructed by the Portland engineering firm, James & Yost in 1955. The elevator was designed to be fu- turistic in style and to incorporate minimal ornament. From downtown, the elevator is accessed through a tunnel aligned with the intersection of 7th Street and Railroad Avenue or via a tunnel that runs east under the Union Pacific railroad tracks at the base of Singer Hill. Metal elevator doors are embedded in the tunnel’s eastern wall. These doors access a staffed Otis elevator that rises through the elevator’s narrow, cylindrical shaft into the center of an observatory. The horseshoe-shaped observatory has canted walls and large windows offering un- obstructed views of the city below, including the Willamette Falls to the south. From the observation deck, pedestrians exit east to the paved McLoughlin Promenade, a linear park with a concrete pathway that runs north and south along the edge of the bluff. The elevator is backed by the natural vegeta- tion and basalt outcroppings of the bluff, and is constructed of reinforced lightweight concrete. Routine maintenance has occurred over the years, but the tunnel, shaft and observa- tion deck retain excellent integrity of design, materials, work- manship, site, location, feeling and association.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcloughlin Canemah Trail Alignment Feasibility And
    MCLOUGHLIN-CANEMAH TRAIL PLAN Alignment Feasibility & Evaluation Report Prepared by Alta Planning + Design with Northwest Geotech, Inc and Pacific Habitat Services, Inc For the City of Oregon City, Oregon November, 2017 CONTENTS I. Executive Summary .........................................................................7 V. Typical Cross Sections & Design Features ...............................31 A. TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS B. DETAIL PLANS II. Introduction .......................................................................................13 A. PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C. NEXT STEPS & IMPLEMENTATION B. SITE SETTING C. REGIONAL CONTEXT VI. Appendix 1 D. ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS Geotechnical Report .......................................................................49 E. RELEVANT PROJECTS AND PLANS F. IMPORTANT AGENCIES AND PARTNERS VII. Appendix 2 G. STAKEHOLDER AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY Environmental Report ....................................................................55 III. Alignment Alternatives Evaluation .............................................19 VIII. Appendix 3 A. SUMMARY DESCRIPTIONS Greenway for a Day Public Event Summary ............................53 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS C. DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS IX. Appendix 4 D. OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS Stakeholder Evaluation Materials ...............................................71 E. EVALUATION MATRIX X. Appendix 5 IV. Preferred Trail Alignment ..............................................................27 A. SUMMARY DESCRIPTIONS Planning-Level
    [Show full text]
  • Mcloughlin Promenade the MCLOUGHLIN PROMENADE 1851
    Photo by Ian Poellet NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC PLACES McLoughlin Promenade THE MCLOUGHLIN PROMENADE 1851 THE MCLOUGHLIN PROMENADE is a historic park site along the The park has been well maintained by the City of Oregon edge of Oregon City’s prominent bluff which was donated to City, as well as by local residents who take pride in caring the people of Oregon City by Dr. John McLoughlin in 1851. for its landscaping. The Promenade was recently restored by Between 1936 and 1939, the contributing park site was im- stone masons who were able to repair degraded stone and proved by three distinct but connected contributing structures concrete elements while retaining the rustic character of the constructed of locally quarried basalt and concrete. These original materials. The landscape features and the three con- structures are locally significant, as examples of Oregon tributing structures retain excellent integrity. City’s direct response to trends in local, state and national history. The first element is a 2,300-foot-long basalt stone and concrete pathway that runs along the prominent bluff, ap- proximately 100-feet above historic downtown Oregon City. The second element is known as the Grand Staircase. It con- sists of a stone and concrete stairway at the north end of the path that leads down the bluff and curves south to meet the Municipal Elevator tunnel. A second leg of the Grand Stair- case, known as the Singer Hill Road underpass, crosses below Singer Hill to the east of the Promenade, and rises through two short flights of stairs to the grassy lawns surrounding the McLoughlin House.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Metro Council for the Purpose of Submitting to the Voters of the Metro Area General Obligation Bonds in the Amount Of
    BEFORE THE METRO COUNCIL FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING TO THE ) RESOLUTION NO. 19-4988 VOTERS OF THE METRO AREA GENERAL ) OBLIGATION BONDS IN THE AMOUNT OF ) $475 MILLION TO FUND NATURAL AREA ) Introduced by Metro Council President Lynn AND WATER QUALITY PROTECTION AND ) Peterson TO CONNECT PEOPLE TO NATURE CLOSE ) TO HOME; AND SETTING FORTH THE ) OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE METRO COUNCIL ) TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN EXPENDITURES ) OUT OF THE PROCEEDS OF SAID BONDS ) UPON ISSUANCE ) WHEREAS, the Metro Council has taken a leadership role in protecting water quality and natural areas in greater Portland and providing access to nature for people through an interconnected system of parks, trails and natural areas; and WHEREAS, in 1992, the Metro Council, along with the cities and counties of greater Portland adopted the Greenspaces Master Plan, identifying 57 regional natural areas and 34 regional trails and greenways requiring protection; and WHEREAS, in May 1995, voters in the Metro area approved a $135.6 million bond measure with a stated goal of protecting and acquiring land in 14 regional natural areas and six of the regional trails and greenways identified in the Greenspaces Master Plan; and WHEREAS, in December 2005, the Metro Council adopted Ordinance No. 05-1077C, establishing Title 13 of Metro’s Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, in order to facilitate the conservation, protection, and restoration of continuous and ecologically viable streamside corridors and to improve water quality; and WHEREAS, in November 2006, voters in the Metro
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Falls Riverwalk
    MASTER PLAN Willamette Falls Riverwalk NOVEMBER 2017 DRAFT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Follow the Project Partners Design Team Willamette Falls City of Oregon City Snøhetta Legacy Project Clackamas County Mayer/Reed, Inc. website: Metro DIALOG willamettefallslegacy.org State of Oregon JLA Public Involvement KPFF Consulting Engineers Technical Advisory Committee and Project Flowing Solutions LLC Staff City of Oregon City DKS Associates @willamettefallslegacyproject Clackamas County NW Geotech, Inc. Metro DCW Cost Management @willamettefallslegacyproject State of Oregon Technical Consultants CH2M Property Owners Falls Legacy LLC Stillwater Sciences @WFLegacyProject Portland General Electric MIG, Inc. ECONorthwest Native American Tribes #willamettefalls Confederated Tribes of the Maul Foster Alongi, Inc. Umatilla Indian Reservation Rick Williams Consulting #wflp Confederated Tribes of the Grand Heritage Resource Associates, Inc. Ronde Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakama Nation TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Part IV: Recommended Riverwalk Concept Design 61 Key Uses Part I: Introduction 5 Falls Viewing Access Willamette Falls: A Natural Treasure Paths, Walkways and Biking Trails Metro Parks and Nature Collective Gathering and Event Spaces Oregon City Parks and Recreation Habitat Restoration and Natural History Interpretation Project Background River Access and Activities Previous Work: Laying the Foundation PGE Dam Site Ownership Historic and Cultural Interpretation Purpose
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form 1
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (3-82) Exp. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places received SEP 3 0 I985 Inventory—Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms " ; Type all entries—complete applicable sections____________________________________ 1. Name historic Petzold,_&ichard 3 House and or common Same Number of Contributing Resources 1 2. Location street & number 504 5th Street N/A not for publication city, town Oregon City vicinity of Fifth Congressional District state Oregon code 41 county ciackamas code 005 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public X occupied agriculture museum _X_ building(s) _ I private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational X private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object N/A in process )( yes: restricted government scientific N//\ being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other! 4. Owner of Property name Carol C. !Wood street & number 3335 Oahu Avenue city, town Honolulu N/A vicinity of state HI 96822 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Ciackamas County Courthouse street & number 8th & Main Streets city, town Oregon City state OR 97045 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Oregon City Architectural and title Historical Survey——————— has this property been determined eligible? yes X no date 19ft? federal state county X local depository for survey records Oregon City Hall city, town Oregon City state QR 97Q45 7. Description Condition Check one Check one _ X- excellent deteriorated X unaltered X original site good ruins altered moved date N/A fair unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance The two and one half story Craftsman style residence was constructed in 1911 by Charles and Henry Vonderahe for Richard Petzold and his family.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcloughlin Promenade Other Names/Site Number --NIA ------2
    NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0016 (Expires 5/31 /2012) ~CEIVfC2LbG United States Department of the Interior National Park Service MAR 1 2 Z014 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin , How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Mcloughlin Promenade other names/site number --NIA - - ----- --- --------- - ------ - ---- -- 2. Location street & number 7.8-acre · · er Hill bluff, 1 block west of Hi h St. D not for publication city or town _O_re"""g.._o_n_ C_it_,__y _ ______ _ _______________ _ D vicinity state Ore on code OR county Clackamas code _ 0_0_5_ zip code ---'9----'-7_0_45-=----- 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _!__ nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property_!__ meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: -& _statewide ..JLlocal s;goaMe of rert~ c;,,n--r% Oregon State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property _ meets_ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Works June 20, 2019 Metro Regional Flexible Funds Allocation Committee 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 Re
    Public Works 625 Center Street | Oregon City OR 97045 Ph (503) 657-0891 | Fax (503) 657-7892 June 20, 2019 Metro Regional Flexible Funds Allocation Committee 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 Re: 2022-2024 Regional Flexible Funds Allocation Application Willamette Falls Shared Use Path & OR 99E Corridor Enhancement Project Dear Committee Members: The City of Oregon City is pleased to be submitting this application for a Metro Regional Flexible Funds Allocation. Our application is for Willamette Falls Shared Use Path & OR 99E Corridor Enhancement Project, an Active Transportation Project located in downtown Oregon City. The scope of work is for Project Development, which will include Alternatives Identification & Evaluation, Preliminary Design (30%), Stakeholder Engagement and Environmental Clearances. In 2005 the included McLoughlin Boulevard Enhancement Plan was adopted. This plan completed the Planning Phase as well as Alternatives Identification & Evaluation for the corridor. The City has successfully implemented the first two phases of McLoughlin Boulevard, using this plan. This remaining portion of the McLoughlin Boulevard Enhancement Plan located between 10th Street and the tunnel has been the most complicated to complete as it is interwoven with the OR 99E viaducts. As replacement of the viaduct seems to be falling off any future project lists, Oregon City sees a vital need take a step back and re-evaluate options to complete the remaining critical pedestrian & bicycle gaps along this corridor. In 2005 the plan assumed the viaducts would be replaced in the near future, which would have allowed the cross sections identified in the 2005 plan to be implemented between 8th Street & 10th Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Development – Planning TYPE III – HISTORIC REVIEW STAFF REPORT and RECOMMENDATION December 3, 2020 FILE NO.: G
    Community Development – Planning 695 Warner Parrott Rd. | Oregon City OR 97045 Ph (503) 722-3789 | Fax (503) 722-3880 TYPE III – HISTORIC REVIEW STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION December 3, 2020 FILE NO.: GLUA-20-00046 and HR 20-00010: Historic Review for a major public improvement within the McLoughlin Conservation District. APPLICANT/OWNER: City of Oregon City PO Box 3040 Oregon City, OR 97045 LOCATION: 300 3rd Street (McLoughlin Promenade), or Municipal Elevator Oregon City, OR 97045 Clackamas County Map 2-2E-31CA-09200 REQUEST: Historic Review for a major public improvement within the McLoughlin Conservation District to install a freestanding laminate sign either within the McLoughlin Promenade park, or alternatively, at the Municipal Elevator. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions. Type III decisions involve the greatest amount of discretion and evaluation of subjective approval standards, yet are not required to be heard by the city commission, except upon appeal. The process for these land use decisions is controlled by ORS 197.763 and identified in OCMC 17.50. The decision of the Historic Review Board is appealable to the City Commission within fourteen days of the issuance of the final decision. Please be advised that any issue that is intended to provide a basis for appeal must be raised before the close of the hearing, in person or by letter, with sufficient specificity to afford the Historic Review Board and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue. Failure to raise an issue with sufficient specificity will preclude any appeal on that issue. The decision of the Historic Review Board may be appealed to the City Commission by parties with standing.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail News Summer 2009
    City of Oregon City Summer 2009 CITY News, Services & Information COMMUNITY Events & Information PARKS, RECREATION & LIBRARY Programs & Services City of Oregon City • 320 Warner Milne Rd • PO Box 3040 • Oregon City, OR 97045 • 503-657-0891 • www.orcity.org CITY MATTERS —by Mayor Alice Norris ake Care of Oregon Day, which coincided Oregon City’s other Economic Stimulus award of Twith Oregon City’s Earth Day annual clean-up, $2.6 million will give jobs to over 60 skilled workers brought over 140 people of all ages together for a realigning the intersection, rehabilitating the pave- common goal: to contribute sweat equity toward ment and utility upgrades at Warner Milne/Molalla keeping Oregon City clean, beautiful and safe. Our Avenue, and adding new lanes at the Beavercreek prominent public spaces are now litter-free, weed- Road intersection. free, and hosting many freshly planted native spe- Another visible and very urgent project in our town cies. Thank you! will be the replacement of the roof on our municipal Work will soon begin on one of Oregon City’s most swimming pool. The pool is 42 years old with a flat famous landmarks: the McLoughlin Promenade. roof that is leaking badly and causing structural, safe- Great ideas Built in 1938 as a WPA (Works Projects Administra- ty, electrical and health concerns. Using $300,000 originate in tion) project during the Great Depression, the 70 out of contingency funds, this project should be com- year old historic rockwork wall and walkway will be pleted by the end of June. the muscles. fully restored with $1.06 million awarded to Oregon All of these projects will maintain employment and City from the 2009 Economic Stimulus Package.
    [Show full text]