A Linear-Logarithmic CMOS Pixel for High Dynamic Range Behavior with Fixed-Pattern-Noise Correction and Tunable Responsivity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Linear-Logarithmic CMOS Pixel for High Dynamic Range Behavior with Fixed-Pattern-Noise Correction and Tunable Responsivity A linear-logarithmic CMOS pixel for high dynamic range behavior with fixed-pattern-noise correction and tunable responsivity Monica Vatteroni, Daniele Covi and Alvise Sartori Neuricam s.p.A. Via Grazioli 71, I-38100 Trento, Italy {vatteroni,covi,sartori}@neuricam.com Abstract—A CMOS image sensor with programmable dynamic are the simplicity of the architecture and the wide obtainable range linear-logarithmic response through tunable transition dynamic range. Disadvantages are the pure response at low point and fixed pattern noise correction is presented. Each 2 light and the high residual FPN. 9.4x9.4μm pixel cell integrates a 5T active pixel structure with a An alternative and more recent technique to obtain intra- hard reset and an active load for the high light logarithmic frame high dynamic range is the so called time-to-saturation behavior. A chip with a 100x100 pixel array and 12-bit digital approach [7]; in this case, two signals are combined to obtain output has been fabricated in a 0.35um, 3.3V standard CMOS an enhanced dynamic image: a standard linear output and a technology. The dynamic range of the sensor can be changed from 45dB to over 120dB with decreasing pixel resolution, the signal related to the time needed to reach a saturation temporal noise is lower than 0.22% over the full range and the threshold. The range depends on the function used to map the fixed patter of 0.83% (1.39%) in the linear (logarithmic) region. saturation time into the read-out voltage signal and is theoretically extendable to over 120dB. Keywords: dynamic range, image sensor, CMOS active pixel, A detailed reference list with a comparative theoretical study digital camera. of main high dynamic (HDR) architectures can be found in [8]. This work proposes an architecture which aims to take I. INTRODUCTION advantage of the simplicity and wide dynamic range of the High Dynamic Range (HDR) is the capability to map a wide logarithmic technique, overcoming his disadvantages. Starting range of light in the same picture. Techniques to obtain high from this basic idea, a novel image sensor with linear- dynamic range have been widely studied in the past and can logarithmic response has been developed. In this contribute be classified in two major groups: intra-frame and inter-frame we present the design and characterization of a 100×100 pixel techniques. In the first case the whole light dynamic is image sensor, fabricated in a standard 0.35μm, 3.3V CMOS mapped in the same image, in the second one, the high technology. The sensor is capable of high dynamic range dynamic range image is a result of the combination of more imaging (over 120dB), with a complete pixel level fixed than one image [1-3]. Nowadays the simplicity of the multi- pattern noise (FPN) subtraction in the linear region as well integration technique makes it the most used at industrial partially in the logarithmic one. Moreover, the power level. In a technique that can be considered an evolution of responsivity curve of the proposed sensor can be easily the multiple capture one, pixels are progressively reset to a adjusted, through a tunable analog reference, to obtain a wide decreasing reference value [4]. The result is that only pixels dynamic range rather than a high pixel resolution. which, at every commutation, have reached a voltage lower The pixel operating principle is described in Section II, the than the new reference value will be reset while the other will imager architecture is discussed in Section III and continue to discharge. This leads to an intra-frame image with measurement results are presented in section IV. enhanced noise performance. Within intra-frame techniques, the simplest is the logarithmic one [5-6]. The array is continuously read-out and the photo-detector output is II. PIXEL OPERATION PRINCIPLE compressed by means of a dynamic MOS load. The result is a The proposed linear-logarithmic pixel is shown in Figure logarithmic compressed light response that covers over 6 1. The pixel is covered by patent [9] and operates as follows. decades of irradiance. The main advantages of this technique The image acquisition starts by resetting the integration 1-4244-2581-5/08/$20.00 ©2008 IEEE 930 IEEE SENSORS 2008 Conference capacitance through the reset switch. In this phase the input of Correlated Double Sampling (CDS) Column Amplifier, a node is set to the reset voltage Vres. After that the integration Data Double Sampling (DDS) block [10], a pre-amplifier, a starts by switching RES off. During the integration the photo- 12-bit ADC, and several other support blocks (Figure 2). generated current Iph is integrated onto the parasitic When a row-decoder selects a row, every pixel of the selected capacitance at the input node (In). In low-medium light line transfers simultaneously its output value to a Column conditions, the pixel operates as a standard active pixel sensor Amplifier which stores the information. Then the pixels of the (APS) and the light intensity is linearly related to the voltage selected row are reset and their reset values are transferred to at the photosensitive node Vin. Nevertheless, in a standard the associated bit-line Column Amplifier. The Column APS, increasing the light intensity, the input node quickly Amplifiers subtracts this value from the stored one and makes saturates and no information is associated to light the result available at the output. This subtraction allows to corresponding to voltage over the saturation value. In the eliminate pixel Fixed Pattern Noise. This correction is linear-logarithmic pixel, the voltage at the photosensitive node complete in the case of linear response and partial in case of increase linearly with the light intensity up to voltage value logarithmic response because the contribution of the MOS depending on the commutation voltage VLOG. Above this active load is not cancelled. The Column Amplifiers are threshold an active MOS pixel load becomes active and the selected by a column decoder and the output value of each one response of the pixel is logarithmicly compressed, been is sequentially transferred to a DDS that performs a double potentially able to see images in a range over 120 dB. The reading of each Column Amplifier, signal and reset value, a VLOG voltage is tunable by the user in order to modify the subtraction between them and an addition of a threshold power response to enhance the light dynamic range rather than voltage (VREF). The DDS output is differential, following the the pixel responsivity. At different value of the VLOG voltage, law: between 1.0V and 3.3V, the light dynamic of the sensor VOutDDS± = VCM ± GAIN × (VREF - (VResCDSOut - VSigCDSOut)) changes from 50dB to over 120dB, progressively reducing the linear region. where VOutDDS± are the DDS Outputs, VResCDSOut is the Column It has also to be noted that the hard reset implemented at pixel Amplifier Reset Output, VSigCDSOut is the Column Amplifier level allows a fixed patter noise (FPN) correction not only in Signal Output, VREF is a reference voltage, VCM is the common the linear region, but also partially in the logarithmic one with mode voltage and GAIN is the DDS variable gain ( between 1 a significant improvement of the raw image quality also in the and 4). high light range. The DDS differential output signals are sent to a 12-bit The simplicity of this architecture permits a compact pixel ADC and digitized into 4096 levels. Each pixel is therefore design according to the used CMOS technology. described by a 12-bit word following the law: + − − V V 11 ADCOUT = OutDDS OutDDS * 2 VREFP −VREFN where VOutDDS± are the DDS differential output, VREFP and VREFN are the ADC reference voltages and ADCOUT is the ADC digital output word. Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed pixel. III. CHIP ARCHITECTURE Figure 2. Sempified block diagram of the camera. The linear-logarithmic technique presented in this work has been implemented in a monolithic active-pixel IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS grey level camera-on-a-chip sensor. The photo-sensitive The image sensor has been realized in a standard 0.35μm matrix consists of 100×100 pixel array based on a CMOS technology. The chip layout is shown in Figure 3. nwell/psubstrate photodiode, with a pixel pitch of 9.4μm×9.4μm. The sensor integrates a pixel array, a number 931 The die size is about 6.36mm×3.68mm, including test is clearly valuable that the light response resolution is structures not described in this work. Electro-optical tests were significantly higher in the linear region than in the logarithmic carried out on a dedicated electro-optical bench to characterize one but, changing the VLOG value from 1.8V to 2.2V the loss, the imager sensor performance. For this purpose, a custom in terms of dynamic range, in the linear region is insignificant board has been developed (Figure 4). The overall integration if compared to the overall gain of one decade. It has to be time has been set to 30ms and the VLOG reference has been set noted that the limitation to 110dB of the power response is to different values to prove the power responsivity due to the measurement set-up and can theoretically go over modulation. the 120dB. Nevertheless, the sensitivity of the pixel can be improved increasing the integration time, like in a standard linear APS. The measured Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) is also reported in Figure 5, showing the possibility to obtain a maximum DR over the 120dB, in fact it can be noted that there is no appreciable decrease in the SNR curve for strong incident light.
Recommended publications
  • Logarithmic Image Sensor for Wide Dynamic Range Stereo Vision System
    Logarithmic Image Sensor For Wide Dynamic Range Stereo Vision System Christian Bouvier, Yang Ni New Imaging Technologies SA, 1 Impasse de la Noisette, BP 426, 91370 Verrieres le Buisson France Tel: +33 (0)1 64 47 88 58 [email protected], [email protected] NEG PIXbias COLbias Abstract—Stereo vision is the most universal way to get 3D information passively. The fast progress of digital image G1 processing hardware makes this computation approach realizable Vsync G2 Vck now. It is well known that stereo vision matches 2 or more Control Amp Pixel Array - Scan Offset images of a scene, taken by image sensors from different points RST - 1280x720 of view. Any information loss, even partially in those images, will V Video Out1 drastically reduce the precision and reliability of this approach. Exposure Out2 In this paper, we introduce a stereo vision system designed for RD1 depth sensing that relies on logarithmic image sensor technology. RD2 FPN Compensation The hardware is based on dual logarithmic sensors controlled Hsync and synchronized at pixel level. This dual sensor module provides Hck H - Scan high quality contrast indexed images of a scene. This contrast indexed sensing capability can be conserved over more than 140dB without any explicit sensor control and without delay. Fig. 1. Sensor general structure. It can accommodate not only highly non-uniform illumination, specular reflections but also fast temporal illumination changes. Index Terms—HDR, WDR, CMOS sensor, Stereo Imaging. the details are lost and consequently depth extraction becomes impossible. The sensor reactivity will also be important to prevent saturation in changing environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Receiver Dynamic Range: Part 2
    The Communications Edge™ Tech-note Author: Robert E. Watson Receiver Dynamic Range: Part 2 Part 1 of this article reviews receiver mea- the receiver can process acceptably. In sim- NF is the receiver noise figure in dB surements which, taken as a group, describe plest terms, it is the difference in dB This dynamic range definition has the receiver dynamic range. Part 2 introduces between the inband 1-dB compression point advantage of being relatively easy to measure comprehensive measurements that attempt and the minimum-receivable signal level. without ambiguity but, unfortunately, it to characterize a receiver’s dynamic range as The compression point is obvious enough; assumes that the receiver has only a single a single number. however, the minimum-receivable signal signal at its input and that the signal is must be identified. desired. For deep-space receivers, this may be COMPREHENSIVE MEASURE- a reasonable assumption, but the terrestrial MENTS There are a number of candidates for mini- mum-receivable signal level, including: sphere is not usually so benign. For specifi- The following receiver measurements and “minimum-discernable signal” (MDS), tan- cation of general-purpose receivers, some specifications attempt to define overall gential sensitivity, 10-dB SNR, and receiver interfering signals must be assumed, and this receiver dynamic range as a single number noise floor. Both MDS and tangential sensi- is what the other definitions of receiver which can be used both to predict overall tivity are based on subjective judgments of dynamic range do. receiver performance and as a figure of merit signal strength, which differ significantly to compare competing receivers.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Falcon™ Range of Microphone Products (Ba5105)
    Technical Documentation Microphone Handbook For the Falcon™ Range of Microphone Products Brüel&Kjær B K WORLD HEADQUARTERS: DK-2850 Nærum • Denmark • Telephone: +4542800500 •Telex: 37316 bruka dk • Fax: +4542801405 • e-mail: [email protected] • Internet: http://www.bk.dk BA 5105 –12 Microphone Handbook Revision February 1995 Brüel & Kjær Falcon™ Range of Microphone Products BA 5105 –12 Microphone Handbook Trademarks Microsoft is a registered trademark and Windows is a trademark of Microsoft Cor- poration. Copyright © 1994, 1995, Brüel & Kjær A/S All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without prior consent in writing from Brüel & Kjær A/S, Nærum, Denmark. 0 − 2 Falcon™ Range of Microphone Products Brüel & Kjær Microphone Handbook Contents 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1 – 1 1.1 About the Microphone Handbook............................................................................... 1 – 2 1.2 About the Falcon™ Range of Microphone Products.................................................. 1 – 2 1.3 The Microphones ......................................................................................................... 1 – 2 1.4 The Preamplifiers........................................................................................................ 1 – 8 1 2. Prepolarized Free-field /2" Microphone Type 4188....................... 2 – 1 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Signal-To-Noise Ratio and Dynamic Range Definitions
    Signal-to-noise ratio and dynamic range definitions The Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and Dynamic Range (DR) are two common parameters used to specify the electrical performance of a spectrometer. This technical note will describe how they are defined and how to measure and calculate them. Figure 1: Definitions of SNR and SR. The signal out of the spectrometer is a digital signal between 0 and 2N-1, where N is the number of bits in the Analogue-to-Digital (A/D) converter on the electronics. Typical numbers for N range from 10 to 16 leading to maximum signal level between 1,023 and 65,535 counts. The Noise is the stochastic variation of the signal around a mean value. In Figure 1 we have shown a spectrum with a single peak in wavelength and time. As indicated on the figure the peak signal level will fluctuate a small amount around the mean value due to the noise of the electronics. Noise is measured by the Root-Mean-Squared (RMS) value of the fluctuations over time. The SNR is defined as the average over time of the peak signal divided by the RMS noise of the peak signal over the same time. In order to get an accurate result for the SNR it is generally required to measure over 25 -50 time samples of the spectrum. It is very important that your input to the spectrometer is constant during SNR measurements. Otherwise, you will be measuring other things like drift of you lamp power or time dependent signal levels from your sample.
    [Show full text]
  • High Dynamic Range Ultrasound Imaging
    The final publication is available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11548-018-1729-3 Int J CARS manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) High Dynamic Range Ultrasound Imaging Alperen Degirmenci · Douglas P. Perrin · Robert D. Howe Received: 26 January 2018 Abstract Purpose High dynamic range (HDR) imaging is a popular computational photography technique that has found its way into every modern smartphone and camera. In HDR imaging, images acquired at different exposures are combined to increase the luminance range of the final image, thereby extending the limited dynamic range of the camera. Ultrasound imaging suffers from limited dynamic range as well; at higher power levels, the hyperechogenic tissue is overexposed, whereas at lower power levels, hypoechogenic tissue details are not visible. In this work, we apply HDR techniques to ultrasound imaging, where we combine ultrasound images acquired at different power levels to improve the level of detail visible in the final image. Methods Ultrasound images of ex vivo and in vivo tissue are acquired at different acoustic power levels and then combined to generate HDR ultrasound (HDR-US) images. The performance of five tone mapping operators is quantitatively evaluated using a similarity metric to determine the most suitable mapping for HDR-US imaging. Results The ex vivo and in vivo results demonstrated that HDR-US imaging enables visualizing both hyper- and hypoechogenic tissue at once in a single image. The Durand tone mapping operator preserved the most amount of detail across the dynamic range. Conclusions Our results strongly suggest that HDR-US imaging can improve the utility of ultrasound in image-based diagnosis and procedure guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Preview Only
    AES-6id-2006 (r2011) AES information document for digital audio - Personal computer audio quality measurements Published by Audio Engineering Society, Inc. Copyright © 2006 by the Audio Engineering Society Preview only Abstract This document focuses on the measurement of audio quality specifications in a PC environment. Each specification listed has a definition and an example measurement technique. Also included is a detailed description of example test setups to measure each specification. An AES standard implies a consensus of those directly and materially affected by its scope and provisions and is intended as a guide to aid the manufacturer, the consumer, and the general public. An AES information document is a form of standard containing a summary of scientific and technical information; originated by a technically competent writing group; important to the preparation and justification of an AES standard or to the understanding and application of such information to a specific technical subject. An AES information document implies the same consensus as an AES standard. However, dissenting comments may be published with the document. The existence of an AES standard or AES information document does not in any respect preclude anyone, whether or not he or she has approved the document, from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the standard. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this AES standard or information document may be the subject of patent rights. AES shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patents. This document is subject to periodicwww.aes.org/standards review and users are cautioned to obtain the latest edition and printing.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Microphone Sensitivity by Jerad Lewis
    Understanding Microphone Sensitivity By Jerad Lewis Sensitivity, the ratio of the analog output voltage or digital output value to the input pressure, is a key specification of any microphone. Mapping units in the acoustic domain to units in the electrical domain, it determines the magnitude of the microphone output signal given a known input. This article will discuss the distinction in sensitivity specifications between analog and digital microphones, how to choose a microphone with the best sensitivity for the application, and why adding a bit (or more) of digital gain can enhance the microphone signal. Analog vs. Digital Microphone sensitivity is typically measured with a 1 kHz sine wave at a 94 dB sound pressure level (SPL), or 1 pascal (Pa) pressure. The magnitude of the analog or digital output signal from the microphone with that input stimulus is a measure of its sensitivity. This reference point is but one characteristic of the microphone, by no means the whole story of its performance. The sensitivity of an analog microphone is straightforward and easy to understand. Typically specified in logarithmic units of dBV (decibels with respect to 1 V), it tells how many volts the output signal will be for a given SPL. For an analog microphone, sensitivity, in linear units of mV/Pa, can be expressed logarithmically in decibels: Sensitivity = × mV / Pa Sensitivity dBV 20 log10 Output REF where OutputREF is the 1000 mV/Pa (1 V/Pa) reference output ratio. Given this information, with the appropriate preamplifier gain, the microphone signal level can be easily matched to the desired input level of the rest of the circuit or system.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Audio Effects
    applied sciences Review A History of Audio Effects Thomas Wilmering 1,∗ , David Moffat 2 , Alessia Milo 1 and Mark B. Sandler 1 1 Centre for Digital Music, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (M.B.S.) 2 Interdisciplinary Centre for Computer Music Research, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 December 2019; Accepted: 13 January 2020; Published: 22 January 2020 Abstract: Audio effects are an essential tool that the field of music production relies upon. The ability to intentionally manipulate and modify a piece of sound has opened up considerable opportunities for music making. The evolution of technology has often driven new audio tools and effects, from early architectural acoustics through electromechanical and electronic devices to the digitisation of music production studios. Throughout time, music has constantly borrowed ideas and technological advancements from all other fields and contributed back to the innovative technology. This is defined as transsectorial innovation and fundamentally underpins the technological developments of audio effects. The development and evolution of audio effect technology is discussed, highlighting major technical breakthroughs and the impact of available audio effects. Keywords: audio effects; history; transsectorial innovation; technology; audio processing; music production 1. Introduction In this article, we describe the history of audio effects with regards to musical composition (music performance and production). We define audio effects as the controlled transformation of a sound typically based on some control parameters. As such, the term sound transformation can be considered synonymous with audio effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Multiplierless Approximations of the DCT with the Lifting Scheme Jie Liang, Student Member, IEEE, and Trac D
    3032 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 49, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2001 Fast Multiplierless Approximations of the DCT With the Lifting Scheme Jie Liang, Student Member, IEEE, and Trac D. Tran, Member, IEEE Abstract—In this paper, we present the design, implementation, the sparse factorizations of the DCT matrix [12]–[17], and and application of several families of fast multiplierless approx- many of them are recursive [12], [14], [16], [17]. Besides imations of the discrete cosine transform (DCT) with the lifting one-dimensional (1-D) algorithms, two-dimensional (2-D) scheme called the binDCT. These binDCT families are derived from Chen’s and Loeffler’s plane rotation-based factorizations of DCT algorithms have also been investigated extensively [6], the DCT matrix, respectively, and the design approach can also [18]–[21], generally leading to less computational complexity be applied to a DCT of arbitrary size. Two design approaches are than the row-column application of the 1-D methods. However, presented. In the first method, an optimization program is defined, the implementation of the direct 2-D DCT requires much more and the multiplierless transform is obtained by approximating effort than that of the separable 2-D DCT. its solution with dyadic values. In the second method, a general lifting-based scaled DCT structure is obtained, and the analytical The theoretical lower bound on the number of multiplications values of all lifting parameters are derived, enabling dyadic required for the 1-D eight-point DCT has been proven to be 11 approximations with different accuracies. Therefore, the binDCT [22], [23]. In this sense, the method proposed by Loeffler et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Range White Paper
    www.vialite.com +44 (0)1793 784389 [email protected] +1 (855) 4-VIALITE [email protected] White Paper The Importance of Dynamic Range in Fiber Optic Links Traditionally satellite transponders were 36 MHz wide and Spurious Free Dynamic Range (SFDR) of an RF over fiber link was less important. Ultra-wide dynamic range fiber optic links were a “nice-to- have” because the same product could be used for both the up and down links. However now, with High Throughput Satellites (HTS) which have transponder bandwidths of 500 or 800 MHz, the signals have increased hugely and consequently so have the demands on dynamic range. This means that ultra-wide dynamic range fiber optic links have become a “must-have” for anyone transporting HTS signals. Within this document we compare the SFDR and real dynamic range obtained with HTS satellite signals, and demonstrate why RF over fiber links used in satellite teleports should have a SFDR of 110 dB/Hz2/3 or better for 500 MHz wide signals. As the satellite industry moves towards increasing mobile data capacity, through the use of new satellites and wider channel bandwidths, the demand on higher link dynamic range has increased. Calculating Spurious Free Dynamic Range SFDR is a measure of the dynamic range of a fiber optic link and is relative to 1 Hz of bandwidth - which is not particularly relevant as most signals are much greater than 1 Hz. To calculate SFDR you must use the thermal noise floor (kTB), the noise figure (nf), and the third order intercept point (IP3).
    [Show full text]
  • Linear-Logarithmic CMOS Image Sensor with Reduced FPN Using Photogate and Cascode MOSFET †
    Proceedings Linear-Logarithmic CMOS Image Sensor with Reduced FPN Using Photogate and Cascode MOSFET † Myunghan Bae 1, Byung-Soo Choi 1, Sang-Hwan Kim 1, Jimin Lee 1, Chang-Woo Oh 2, Pyung Choi 1 and Jang-Kyoo Shin 1,* 1 School of Electronics Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea; [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (B.-S.C.); [email protected] (S.-H.K.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (P.C.) 2 Department of Sensor and Display Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-53-950-5531 † Presented at the Eurosensors 2017 Conference, Paris, France, 3–6 September 2017. Published: 18 August 2017 Abstract: We propose a linear-logarithmic CMOS image sensor with reduced fixed pattern noise (FPN). The proposed linear-logarithmic pixel based on a conventional 3-transistor active pixel sensor (APS) structure has additional circuits in which a photogate and a cascade MOSFET are integrated with the pixel structure in conjunction with the photodiode. To improve FPN, we applied the PMOSFET hard reset method as a reset transistor instead of NMOSFET reset normally used in APS. The proposed pixel has been designed and fabricated using 0.18-μm 1-poly 6-metal standard CMOS process. A 120 × 240 pixel array of test chip was divided into 2 different subsections with 60 × 240 sub-arrays, so that the proposed linear-logarithmic pixel with reduced FPN could be compared with the conventional linear-logarithmic pixel.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuromorphic Camera Guided High Dynamic Range Imaging
    Neuromorphic Camera Guided High Dynamic Range Imaging Jin Han1 Chu Zhou1 Peiqi Duan2 Yehui Tang1 Chang Xu3 Chao Xu1 Tiejun Huang2 Boxin Shi2∗ 1Key Laboratory of Machine Perception (MOE), Dept. of Machine Intelligence, Peking University 2National Engineering Laboratory for Video Technology, Dept. of Computer Science, Peking University 3School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, University of Sydney Abstract Conventional camera Reconstruction of high dynamic range image from a sin- gle low dynamic range image captured by a frame-based Intensity map guided LDR image HDR network conventional camera, which suffers from over- or under- 퐼 exposure, is an ill-posed problem. In contrast, recent neu- romorphic cameras are able to record high dynamic range scenes in the form of an intensity map, with much lower Intensity map spatial resolution, and without color. In this paper, we pro- 푋 pose a neuromorphic camera guided high dynamic range HDR image 퐻 imaging pipeline, and a network consisting of specially Neuromorphic designed modules according to each step in the pipeline, camera which bridges the domain gaps on resolution, dynamic range, and color representation between two types of sen- Figure 1. An intensity map guided HDR network is proposed to sors and images. A hybrid camera system has been built fuse the LDR image from a conventional camera and the intensity to validate that the proposed method is able to reconstruct map captured by a neuromorphic camera, to reconstruct an HDR quantitatively and qualitatively high-quality high dynamic image. range images by successfully fusing the images and inten- ing attention of researchers. Neuromorphic cameras have sity maps for various real-world scenarios.
    [Show full text]