DOCSLIB.ORG

On Crimes Against Humanity)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On Crimes Against Humanity) Strasbourg, 15 September 2011 CDL(2011)073* Opinion No. 634 / 2011 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) COMMENTS ON THE CASE SANTIAGO BRYSÓN DE LA BARRA ET AL (ON CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY) AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF PERU by Ms Anne PETERS (Substitute Member, Germany) ---------------------------------------------------- *This document has been classified restricted on the date of issue. Unless the Venice Commission decides otherwise, it will be declassified a year after its issue according to the rules set up in Resolution CM/Res(2001)6 on access to Council of Europe documents. This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL(2011)073 - 2 - Content A. Legal Bases: Codifications.................................................................................................3 Control Council Law No. 10 of 20 Dec. 1945 ......................................................................3 Art. 5 c of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East Charter (IMTFE) of 19 January 1946......................................................................................................................3 Art. 6 c Nuremberg Statute of 8 August 1949 .....................................................................3 ICTY-Statute (Annex to Security Council Res. 808 (1993) of 25 May 1993) .......................4 ICTR-Statute (Annex to Security Council Res. 955 (1994) of 8 Nov. 1994) ........................4 ICC-Statute of 17 July 1998................................................................................................4 Soft Law .............................................................................................................................5 Draft Code of Offences against the Peace and Security of Mankind 1954, Art. 2 ...........5 Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind 1991, Article 21 ........5 Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind 1996,........................5 B. The elements of a crime against humanity.........................................................................6 I. The context of the crime: Inside and outside an armed conflict........................................6 II. “Chapeau requirement”/contextual element: “Attack”......................................................6 1. The “acts” and the contextual element (the “attack”) can be one and the same ( uno actu )...............................................................................................................................6 2. “Attack” need not be a military attack..........................................................................7 3. The attack can be one single action ...........................................................................7 4. The targeted group of the attack: “any civilian population”..........................................8 5. The quantity and quality of the attack: “widespread or systematic” ............................9 6. No additional “policy element” required ....................................................................10 III. The conduct/acts .........................................................................................................10 1. Murder......................................................................................................................10 2. Extermination ...........................................................................................................10 IV. The mental (subjective) element .................................................................................10 1. General ....................................................................................................................10 2. Discriminatory grounds.............................................................................................11 C. The customary law status of the crime in 1986................................................................11 D. The non-limitation of prosecution of the crime .................................................................11 E. Criminalised conduct and sentencing practice of the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda ....................................................................................12 I. Sentences .....................................................................................................................12 1. Overview ..................................................................................................................12 2. Sentences between life imprisonment and three years.............................................12 II. Conduct which has been qualified as amounting to a crime against humanity by the ICTY and the ICTR (examples).........................................................................................12 ICTY.............................................................................................................................12 ICTR.............................................................................................................................19 Annex: Important judicial decisions ......................................................................................20 ICTY.............................................................................................................................20 ICTR.............................................................................................................................21 ICC...............................................................................................................................21 National Courts.................................................................................................................21 France..........................................................................................................................21 Canada ........................................................................................................................21 Israel ............................................................................................................................21 Netherlands..................................................................................................................21 Former German Democratic Republic ..........................................................................21 Follow-up cases of Nuremberg.....................................................................................22 Bibliography .........................................................................................................................22 - 3 - CDL(2011)073 I. Memorial on crimes against humanity Anne Peters This memo consists of six parts: A. Texts of the most important codified norms on the crime B. Analysis of those elements of a crime against humanity which seem to be relevant for the Fronton case C. Discussion of the customary law status of the crime in 1986 D. The non-limitation of prosecution of the crime E. Conduct qualified as crimes against humanity, and sentencing practice of the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda Annex: List of important cases and bibliography The full refererences of all cases and literature quoted in the footnotes are given in the annex to this memo. II. A. Legal Bases: Codifications In this section, the “hard law” norms on crimes against humanity are given in chronological order, followed by the most important soft law texts. A brief comment highlights the most important divergences in the texts. A. Control Council Law No. 10 of 20 Dec. 1945 Article II: 1. Each of the following acts is recognized as a crime: (…) “(c) Crimes against Humanity. Atrocities and offenses, including but not limited to murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, rape, or other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population , or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds whether or not in violation of the domestic laws of the country where perpetrated.” Comment : No link to an armed conflict. Nevertheless, the term “civilian population”, a term of international humanitarian law, is used. B. Art. 5 c of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East Charter (IMTFE) of 19 January 1946 Art. 5: Jurisdiction over persons and offences “The Tribunal shall have the power to try and punish Far Eastern war criminals who as individuals or as members of organizations are charged with offences which include Crimes against Peace. The following acts, or any of them, are crimes coming within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal for which there shall be individual responsibility: (…) c) Crimes against Humanity: Namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population , before or during the war , or persecutions on political or racial grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated. (…) “ Comment: Identical to the Nuremberg statute, which was enacted later. C. Art. 6 c Nuremberg Statute of 8 August 1949 “6(c) CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population , before or during the war ; or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Womens Side of War.Pdf
    Publisher Women in Black - Belgrade, December 2008 Original title Ženska strana rata, Women in Black - Belgrade, 2007 Edited by Lina Vušković and Zorica Trifunović In association with Tamara Belenzada, Helena Rill, Staša Zajović, Lino Veljak, Indira Topčagić, Sanja Cesar and Luljeta Vuniqi Translation Mirka Janković, Stanislava Lazarević, Dubravka Radanov, et al. Proof reading and editing Jennifer Michelle Williams, Janet Fiona Rabin, Tamara Belenzada Layout Marija Vidić Artistic design Bojana Ban Printing Artprint Circulation 1,000 The publication of this book was made possible by Kvinna til Kvinna, Sweden and Quaker Peace & Social Witness, London The translation and printing of the English edition was made possible by The Balkan Trust for Democracy Acknowledgements First and foremost, our thanks go to all those women, both the undersigned and those who have remained anonymous, who related and wrote accounts of their experiences during the wars in the area of the for- mer Yugoslavia and whose testimonies have been included in this compila- tion. We also thank the women who recorded these testimonies and made possible their publication. We thank the authors with whose consent we have published parts of their works free of charge: Alenka Mirković (91,6 MHZ – Voice Against Cannons), Svetlana Djordjević (Testimony on Kosovo), Miroslava Malešević (Didara – Life Story of a Woman from Prizren), Jusuf Kadrić (Brčko: Genocide and Testimonies), Radmila Sesar (radio drama: Mother Meira – In Search of the Truth) and Brendan MacQuillan (Voices of
    [Show full text]
  • CR 2006/41 (Translation)
    BHY CR 2006/41 (translation) CR 2006/41 (traduction) Thursday 4 May 2006 at 10 a.m. Jeudi 4 mai 2006 à 10 heures - 2 - 10 The PRESIDENT: Please be seated. Madame Fauveau-Ivanović, you have the floor. Ms FAUVEAU-IVANOVIĆ: Thank you, Madam President. GENOCIDE I. Genocide was not committed in Bosnia and Herzegovina: the criminal acts were not the consequence of the political objectives of the Bosnian Serbs 1. Madam President, Members of the Court, we have been able to observe during the oral pleadings that the positions of the Applicant and of Serbia and Montenegro do not differ substantially as regards the definition of the constituent elements of genocide enumerated in Article II of the Genocide Convention. 2. We agree that the material elements of the crime of genocide, its actus reus, are enumerated exhaustively in Article II of the Genocide Convention, and that the crime of genocide can only be constituted by the commission of one of the acts enumerated. We have also reached agreement on the fact that such acts constitute genocide only if they are committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religions group, as such. 3. However, we do not agree on the legal characterization of the facts in the present case, since the Applicant alleges that genocide was committed, while we consider that genocide was not committed. Indeed, Madam President, Members of the Court, genocide was not committed in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Neither Serbia and Montenegro nor the Bosnian Serbs had the intention to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations
    UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-95-10-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Date: 14 December 1999 Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of The Former Yugoslavia English since 1991 Original: French IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER Before: Judge Claude Jorda, Presiding Judge Fouad Riad Judge Almiro Rodrigues Registrar: Mrs. Dorothee de Sampayo Garrido-Nijgh Decision of: 14 December 1999 THE PROSECUTOR v. GORAN JELISI] JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Defence Counsel: Mr. Geoffrey Nice Mr. Veselin Londrovi} Mr. Vladimir Tochilovsky Mr. Michael Greaves Case No. IT-95-10-T PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/b3ece5/14 December 1999 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................1 A. The Indictment ...............................................................................................................1 B. Procedural Background..................................................................................................2 II. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND..........................................................................................5 III. THE CRIMES ADMITTED TO BY THE ACCUSED IN THE GUILTY PLEA............6 A. Violations of the laws or customs of war.......................................................................8 1. Murder........................................................................................................................9 2. Cruel Treatment........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • PROSECUTION WITNESSES PROSECUTION (Exclusively for the Use of the Media
    PROSECUTION WITNESSES PROSECUTION (Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) Witness Code / Witness Name and Mode and Time Information on previous testimony (if applicable) and background information Calling Order1 of Testimony Previously testified before the Tribunal: Brđanin case: 7, 17 and 18 June 2002 Milošević case: 3 December 2003 Krajišnik case: 26 July 2004 KDZ263 Partial 92r te 2 1. Ahmet ZULIĆ Ahmet Zulić has previously testified about the general political situation in Sanski Most and about the brutal conditions, 1 hour3 beatings and killings in the detention facilities in which he was held. For more information, please see the “Prosecutions second notification of admission of written evidence pursuant to Rule 92ter with appendices A and B witness Ahmet Zulić” of 24 February 2010 (Document available from ICTY Court Records). Previously testified before the Tribunal: Krajišnik case: 2 and 3 September 2004 Sulejman Crnčalo has previously testified about events in the municipality of Pale in 1991 and the first half of 1992. “The witness was a Muslim factory worker who lived in Pale from 1978 until the time he was expelled on 2 July 1992. He describes the persecution of Muslims in Pale from 1991 until July 1992, when almost all the remaining Muslims were transferred out of the municipality, and the participation of the Bosnian Serb forces (including, in particular, the police, acting in cooperation with paramilitary units) in this campaign…” (Krajišnik case, 2 Sept. 2004, transcript page 5291) KDZ183 2. Sulejman 92ter CRNČALO From the Prosecution submission in the Karadžić case, 2 November 2009: 0.5 hours “… The Witness is a crime-base witness from Pale municipality, who was expelled from Pale to Sarajevo in July 1992, and lived in Sarajevo with his wife and children until the end of the siege.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
    Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology ISSN: 1809-4341 Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA) Peres, Andréa Carolina Schvartz For Human Rights: Constructing the multinational Brčko District in Bosnia and Herzegovina Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology, vol. 15, no. 3, e153509, 2018 Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA) DOI: 10.1590/1809-43412018v15n3d509 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=406958169011 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Dossier Gramáticas de la (¿post?) violencia: identidades, guerras, cuerpos y fronteras For Human Rights: Constructing the multinational Brčko District in Bosnia and Herzegovina Andréa Carolina Schvartz Peres1 2 3 1 Universidade Federal de Roraima, Boa Vista/RR, Brasil 2 Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento, São Paulo/SP, Brasil 3 Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brasil Abstract The Brčko District was conceived to be a multiethnic political-administrative unit in post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina. Various efforts have been made to accomplish this since the year 2000, such as the construction of urban space with the equitable presence of the three national groups recognized by the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the unification of the school system, both with the aim to guarantee human rights, understood as equal cultural rights. This article focuses on the educational system and the monuments policy to critically analyze these endeavors by revealing how policies for the construction of a multinational space have contributed to the maintenance of a divided city, where the borderlines do not need to be official to exist and constantly remind everyone to which group they belong to and what this means.
    [Show full text]
  • MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC AMENDED
    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-00-39 & 40-PT THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC AMENDED CONSOLIDATED INDICTMENT The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, pursuant to her authority under Article 18 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ("the Statute of the Tribunal"), charges: MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC with GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY and VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS AND CUSTOMS OF WAR as set forth below: THE ACCUSED 1. Momcilo KRAJISNIK, son of Sreten and Milka (née Spiric) was born on 20 January 1945 in Zabrdje, municipality of Novi Grad, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. He was a leading member of the Serbian Democratic Party of Bosnia and Herzegovina ("SDS") and he served on a number of SDS bodies and committees. On 12 July 1991, Momcilo KRAJISNIK was elected to the Main Board of the SDS. He was President of the Assembly of Serbian People in Bosnia and Herzegovina ("Bosnian Serb Assembly") from 24 October 1991 until at least November 1995. He was a member of the National Security Council of the Bosnian Serb Republic and from the beginning of June 1992 until 17 December 1992, he was a member of the expanded Presidency of the Bosnian Serb Republic. 2. Biljana PLAVSIC, daughter of Svetislav, was born on 7 July 1930 in Tuzla, Tuzla municipality, Bosnia and Herzegovina. She was a leading member of the SDS from the period of its establishment in Bosnia and Herzegovina. From 18 November 1990 until April 1992, Biljana PLAVSIC was a member of the collective Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia War Crimes: the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and U.S
    96-404 CRS Report for Congress Bosnia War Crimes: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and U.S. Policy Updated April 23, 1998 Margaret Mikyung Lee Legislative Attorney American Law Division Raphael Perl Specialist in International Affairs Steven Woehrel Specialist in European Affairs Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division Congressional Research Service • The Library of Congress ABSTRACT This report provides background and analysis on the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). It describes the origins of the Tribunal; its authority and powers; itsfinancing; and its recent activities and problems. The report discusses U.S. policy on the ICTY; the relationship between the Tribunal and the NATO-led Stabilization Force (SFOR) in Bosnia; and Congressional action on the issue. The report also deals with the impact of the Tribunal's work on the Bosnian peace process as a whole. A final section touches briefly on questions and implications raised by the Tribunal's activities for the powers of the United Nations, the principles of international law, and the U.S. role in enforcing international law. Appendices include a chart describing the current status of those publicly indicted by the Tribunal; historical precedent for the Tribunal; proposals for a permanent international criminal court, and ICTY rules of evidence and procedure. This report will be updated as events warrant. The Congressional Research Service works exclusively for the Congress, conducting re­ search, analyzing legislation, and providing information at the request of committees, Members, and their staffs. The Service makes such research available, without partisan bias in many forms includ­ ing studies, reports, compilations, digests, and background briefings.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission of Fourth Amended Indictment
    IT-09-92-PT 31759 D31759 - D31696 16 December 2011 MC UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No.: IT-09-92-PT Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 16 December 2011 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Alphons Orie, Presiding Judge Bakone Justice Moloto Judge Christoph Flügge Registrar: Mr. John Hocking THE PROSECUTOR v. RATKO MLADI] Public with Public Annex A P ROSECUTION S U B M I S S I O N O F T H E F O U R T H A M E N D E D I NDICTMENT AND S CHEDULES OF I N C I D E N T S The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Dermot Groome Mr. Peter Mc Closkey Counsel for Ratko Mladi}: Mr. Branko Luki} 31758 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA IT-09-92-PT THE PROSECUTOR v. RATKO MLADI] Public with Public Annex A P ROSECUTION S U B M I S S I O N O F T H E F O U R T H A M E N D E D I NDICTMENT AND S CHEDULES OF I N C I D E N T S Introduction 1. Pursuant to the Trial Chamber’s 2 December 2011 Decision,1 the Prosecution hereby files its Fourth Amended Indictment and Schedules of Incidents.2 2. The Prosecution has removed from the Third Amended Indictment (“Indictment”) those crimes enumerated in Schedules A through G which it had proposed not to present evidence.3 These proposed reductions were approved by the Chamber on 2 December 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • “… and That It Does Not Happen to Anyone Anywhere in the World”
    Study “… and that it does not happen to The Trouble with Rape Trials – anyone anywhere Views of Witnesses, Prosecutors and Judges in the world” on Prosecuting Sexualised Violence during the War in the former Yogoslavia © medica mondiale e.V. December 2009 “...and that it does not happen to anyone anywhere in the world” The Trouble with Rape Trials – Views of Witnesses, Prosecutors and Judges on Prosecuting Sexualised Violence during the War in the former Yugoslavia Authors: Coordinators: GABRIELA MISCHKOWSKI, GABRIELA MISCHKOWSKI, GORANA MLINAREVIC SARA SHARRATT Ph.D. Editorial staff: Selmin Çalıs¸kan (Editor-in-chief), Britta Amorin, Lizette Dennis, Jessica Mosbahi, Paul Christensen, Beate Kriechel Special thanks to Vahida Nainar for her help with content editing Layout: Ute Bley This study was supported by a grant from: Cover pictures: © Ursula Meissner/medica mondiale (left), High School as Detention Camp, Focˇa; © Gabriela Mischkowski/ medi ca mondiale (right) Table of Contents Table of Contents Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................5 Introduction by the Authors ..............................................................................................................................8 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................12 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ...........................................................................................................................V ALBANIA ...............................................................................................................................2 Political developments ..........................................................................................................2 Police ill-treatment and torture .............................................................................................. 2 Conditions of detention.........................................................................................................2 Trafficking........................................................................................................................... 3 Domestic violence against women.......................................................................................... 3 BELARUS ...............................................................................................................................3 International concern about human rights............................................................................... 3 Freedom of expression, association and assembly (Update to AI Index: EUR01/012/2005) ........... 4 Prisoners of conscience (updates to AI Index: EUR 01/001/2004 and AI Index: EUR 49/017/2004) 5 Death penalty (update to AI Index: EUR 01/001/2004) ............................................................ 5 BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA.........................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Indictment
    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA CASE NO. IT-00-39-I THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST MOMCILO KRAJISNIK AMENDED INDICTMENT The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, pursuant to her authority under Article 18 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia ("the Statute of the Tribunal"), charges: MOMCILO KRAJISNIK with GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS AND CUSTOMS OF WAR, and GRAVE BREACHES OF THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS as set forth below: THE ACCUSED 1. Momcilo KRAJISNIK, son of Sreten and Milka (née Spiric) was born on 20 January 1945 in Zabrdje, municipality of Novi Grad, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2. Momcilo KRAJISNIK has been a leading member of the Serbian Democratic Party of Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereafter SDS) from the period of its establishment in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Momcilo KRAJISNIK is a long-standing associate of Radovan KARADZIC, former President of the SDS. Together with Radovan KARADZIC, Momcilo KRAJISNIK served on a number of SDS bodies and committees. On 12 July 1991, Momcilo KRAJISNIK was elected to the Main Board of the SDS. 3. Momcilo KRAJISNIK was President of the Assembly of Serbian People in Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereafter Bosnian Serb Assembly) from 24 October 1991 until at least November 1995. 4. From 27 March 1992 Momcilo KRAJISNIK, together with Radovan KARADZIC and other members of the SDS, was a member of the National Security Council of the so called Serbian Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereafter Serbian republic). Momcilo KRAJISNIK, together with Radovan KARADZIC and other members of the SDS, served on the expanded Presidency of the Serbian republic from the beginning of June 1992 until 17 December, 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • ICTY Prosecutor V. Momcilo Perisic
    International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Case: IT-00-39-T Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Date: 27 September 2006 UNITED Committed in the Territory of the NATIONS Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English TRIALU CHAMBER I Before: Judge Alphons Orie, Presiding Judge Joaquín Martín Canivell Judge Claude Hanoteau Registrar: Mr Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 27 September 2006 PROSECUTOR v. MOMČILO KRAJIŠNIK _________________________________________________________________________ JUDGEMENT _________________________________________________________________________ OfficeU of the Prosecutor Mr Mark Harmon Mr Alan Tieger Mr Stephen Margetts Mr Fergal Gaynor Ms Carolyn Edgerton Ms Katrina Gustafson DefenceU Counsel Mr Nicholas Stewart, QC Mr David Josse Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik Preliminary ContentsU General abbreviations 6 1. Introduction and overview 9 1.1 The Accused 9 1.2 Indictment 10 1.3 Bosnia-Herzegovina: geography, population, history 12 1.4 Structure of judgement 14 2. Political precursors 16 2.1 Political developments, 1990 to early 1991 16 2.1.1 Creation of the SDS 16 2.1.2 Division of power among the coalition parties 17 2.2 Arming and mobilization of population 19 2.3 State of fear 24 2.4 Creation of Serb autonomous regions and districts 26 2.5 Creation of Bosnian-Serb Assembly 31 2.6 SDS Instructions of 19 December 1991 36 2.7 Proclamation of Bosnian-Serb Republic 43 2.8 Establishment of Bosnian-Serb Republic 50 3. Administration of Bosnian-Serb Republic 54 3.1 Bosnian-Serb
    [Show full text]