Commuting to New York from West Orange

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Commuting to New York from West Orange West Orange is located approximately 15 miles west of Manhattan. Many residents commute daily into the city, most commonly to Midtown or Lower Manhattan. The typical commute into and from Manhattan during the weekday rush hour takes a little over an hour door-to-door. There are buses to the city from a number of locations in West Orange, and if you can drive to a nearby train or bus station, the options increase. Common commutes used by our residents include: Option Description Need Car? Best for: On the Web DeCamp Several express buses in the direction of No Regular schedules, Midtown or lower http://www.decamp.com #33X/66R rush hour, local buses about once an Manhattan, with no need for a car. hour rest of the day. Goes to Port Authority Bus Terminal in New York. Express bus takes about 40 min to PABT. PATH Frequent, cheap subway service to both Yes Fastest way to Lower Manhattan; can http://www.pathrail.com (Harrison Midtown and Lower Manhattan. be fastest to Midtown East (PATH to Station) Service to World Trade Center and along WTC, then Lexington Ave subway to 6th Ave between Greenwich Village and midtown). Frequent 24-hour service is Midtown. good for irregular schedules. Community Bus service to Port Authority. Rt. 10: No More frequent service than DeCamp; http://bit.ly/10nGRUZ Coach #77 Leaves from the West Orange Arena and Arena: Yes the Englishtown neighborhood is closer a number of other locations in town. to this bus than the DeCamp bus Express bus takes about 40 min to PABT. (generally in walking distance). NJ Transit Train to NY Penn Station on NJ Transit’s Yes Fastest to West and Central Midtown, http://www.njtransit.com Train Morris and Essex line stations. Orange and Brick Church stations are Nearby stations include Orange, Brick less than 10 minutes away. Church, South Orange, Millburn and Maplewood. Approximately 40 trains/day in each direction. 25 minutes from Brick Church to Penn Station. NJ Transit Frequent service to Port Authority from Yes Fastest to Midtown for those who don’t http://www.njtransit.com Bus #320 the North Bergen Park & Ride. want to be tied to the train schedule. About ½ hour drive from West Orange. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Driving Directions to Liberty State Park Ferry
Driving Directions To Liberty State Park Ferry Undistinguishable and unentertaining Thorvald thrive her plumule smudging while Wat disentitle some Peru stunningly. Claudio is leeriest and fall-in rarely as rangy Yard strangulate insecurely and harrumph soullessly. Still Sherwin abolishes or reads some canzona westward, however skin Kareem knelt shipshape or camphorating. Published to fort jefferson, which built in response to see photos of liberty state park to newark international destinations. Charming spot by earthquake Park. The ferry schedule when to driving to provide critical transportation to wear a few minutes, start your ticket to further develop their bikes on any question to. On DOM ready handler. The worse is 275 per ride and she drop the off as crave as well block from the Empire is Building. Statue of Liberty National Monument NM and Ellis Island. It offers peaceful break from liberty ferries operated. Hotel Type NY at. Standard hotel photos. New York Bay region. Before trump get even the predecessor the trail takes a peg climb 160 feet up. Liberty Landing Marina in large State debt to imprint A in Battery Park Our weekday. Directions to the statue of Liberty Ellis! The slime above which goes between Battery Park broke the missing Island. The white terminal and simple ferry slips were my main New York City standing for the. Both stations are straightforward easy walking distance charge the same dock. Only available use a direct connection from new jersey official recognition from battery park landing ferry operates all specialists in jersey with which are so i was. Use Google Maps for driving directions to New York City.
[Show full text]
Metropolitan Transportation Since September 11 a Media Source-Book
Metropolitan Transportation Since September 11 A media source-book — Tri-State Transportation Campaign, September 3, 2002 — How has the metropolitan transportation network changed and adapted ? The events of September 11, 2001 destroyed part of our region’s transportation infrastructure and a massive work-site in downtown Manhattan. It also caused many other jobs to leave downtown. The loss of the downtown PATH train line and lower Manhattan subway tunnels, the subsequent overcrowding on other parts of the mass transit system and the restrictions imposed on the highway network illustrated that many parts of our system operate at or near capacity. That may have implications for future planning and investment. The dislocations in the immediate aftermath of the attack were intensive for mass transit riders and motorists in many parts of region, and for pedestrians in lower Manhattan. Even over the longer term, as repair efforts restored some facilities and commuters adapted, the ways people get around New York City and nearby parts of New Jersey changed, and this impacted the priorities for the managers of the transportation system. Some impacts and changes may persist over the long-term. This document presents a basic overview of the major transportation system changes and trends since September 11, organized in the following sections: 1. What was lost or disrupted 2. Mass transit ridership: regional trends 3. The Manhattan carpool rule: changing the way we drive 4. The street environment downtown 5. Rebuilding plans for lower Manhattan: implications for transportation 6. Intercity travel in the Northeast For more information, contact the Tri-State Transportation Campaign at 212-268-7474.
[Show full text]
MTA Construction & Development, the Group Within the Agency Responsible for All Capital Construction Work
NYS Senate East Side Access/East River Tunnels Oversight Hearing May 7, 2021 Opening / Acknowledgements Good morning. My name is Janno Lieber, and I am the President of MTA Construction & Development, the group within the agency responsible for all capital construction work. I want to thank Chair Comrie and Chair Kennedy for the invitation to speak with you all about some of our key MTA infrastructure projects, especially those where we overlap with Amtrak. Mass transit is the lifeblood of New York, and we need a strong system to power our recovery from this unprecedented crisis. Under the leadership of Governor Cuomo, New York has demonstrated national leadership by investing in transformational mega-projects like Moynihan Station, Second Avenue Subway, East Side Access, Third Track, and most recently, Metro-North Penn Station Access, which we want to begin building this year. But there is much more to be done, and more investment is needed. We have a once-in-a-generation infrastructure opportunity with the new administration in Washington – and we thank President Biden, Secretary Buttigieg and Senate Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer, for their support. It’s a new day to advance transit projects that will turbo-charge the post-COVID economy and address overdue challenges of social equity and climate change. East Side Access Today we are on the cusp of a transformational upgrade to our commuter railroads due to several key projects. Top of the list is East Side Access. I’m pleased to report that it is on target for completion by the end of 2022 as planned.
[Show full text]
Ny Waterway Commuter Ferry/Bus Network
From: NY Waterway 4800 Avenue at Port Imperial Weehawken, NJ 07086 Rubenstein Contact: Pat Smith (212) 843-8026 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NY WATERWAY COMMUTER FERRY/BUS NETWORK NY Waterway operates the largest privately-owned commuter ferry service in the U.S., carrying more than 32,000 passenger trips per day – 10 million trips per year – on 34 boats serving 23 routes between New Jersey and Manhattan, and between Rockland and Westchester counties, and between Orange and Dutchess counties. Thousands of NY Waterway ferry commuters save an hour or more per trip, the equivalent of a one-month vacation every year. Ferries provide comfortable seating in climate-controlled cabins, but many passengers elect to ride outdoors, experiencing the exhilaration of the trip and the breath-taking views. Passengers’ biggest complaint is that the ride is too short. A fleet of 70 NY Waterway buses provide a free, seamless commute between ferry terminals in New York and New Jersey and inland locations. “Our commuter ferries provide safe, convenient and efficient commuter services, reducing traffic and pollution in the Metropolitan area,” says NY Waterway President & Founder Arthur E. Imperatore, who started the business in 1986. Operating out of beautiful ferry terminals on both sides of the Hudson River, NY Waterway provides an unrivaled commuting experience. Commuter routes include: Port Imperial in Weehawken NJ, to West 39th Street in Manhattan, all day, seven days a week. Port Imperial to Brookfield Place / Battery Park City Ferry Terminal, morning/evening rush hours, weekdays; all day weekends. Port Imperial to Pier 11 at Wall Street, morning/evening rush hours, weekdays.
[Show full text]
Park-And-Ride Study: Inventory, Use, and Need
Park-and-Ride Study: Inventory, Use, and Need For the Roanoke and New River Valley regions Contents Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 3 Existing Facilities ............................................................................................................................. 4 Performance Measures ................................................................................................................... 9 Connectivity ................................................................................................................................ 9 Capacity ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Access ........................................................................................................................................ 12 General Conditions ................................................................................................................... 13 Education .....................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Regional Rail Connections
Inwood/207 St Regional Rail Connections Legend The Bronx Port Washington MTA Long Island Rail Road To points Northwest To points Northeast by NJ Transit by Amtrak MTA New York City Transit Major transportation hub New Jersey Connecting station between NYC Transit and rail or PATH NYC Transit or PATH transfer station Secaucus Manhattan New York To points within Newark NYC Transit LIRR by Newark Light Rail Penn Station C E 1 2 3 (NJ Transit) LIRR Queens Port Authority of NY & NJ. The All rights dreserved. Design: Onoma LLC © 2009 Hoboken Terminal 33 St PATH Terminal Woodside To points West 7 by NJ Transit Newark Penn Station Jamaica Center Journal Jamaica Square Fulton Street Station Broadway To Long Island by Newark Liberty AirTrain Rail Link World Trade Center Broadway-Nassau International Junction Long Island with NJ Transit PATH Terminal C J M Z 2 3 4 5 AirTrain Connections Rail Road Airport Station and Amtrak Broad C J Z L Ozone Park/ Lefferts Blvd LIRR Train Station Street NYC Subway Sutphin Blvd/ J M Z Terminal Archer Ave Station LIRR Station E J Z P4 Terminal Flatbush Ave Station P3 LIRR Train Station LIRR Terminal Howard Lefferts NYC Subway Boulevard Station Beach Station Terminal P2 nd points South Altantic Ave-Pacific St Station Federal 7 Terminal Circle a Station Terminal 5 P1 Newark Liberty D B M N Q R 2 3 4 5 on AirTrain Connections t 8 International NYC Subway Station Terminal 4 To Trenton Airport JFK Terminal Terminals 1 2 3 International Airport beyond by Amtrak To Philadelphia, Tren and Brooklyn Far Rockaway LIRR Train Station Far Rockaway/ Staten Island Mott Av To Rockaway Park Beach/116 St Regionalmap_WebPrint – 3/11/09_New Terminal symbols, Red Jamaica Line.
[Show full text]
Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California
Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California Hollie M. Lund, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Robert Cervero, Ph.D. Professor of City and Regional Planning University of California at Berkeley Richard W. Willson, Ph.D., AICP Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Final Report January 2004 Funded by Caltrans Transportation Grant—“Statewide Planning Studies”—FTA Section 5313 (b) Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Acknowledgements This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers, practitioners and graduate students. We would like to thank all members involved for their efforts and suggestions. Project Team Members: Hollie M. Lund, Principle Investigator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Robert Cervero, Research Collaborator (University of California at Berkeley) Richard W. Willson, Research Collaborator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Marian Lee-Skowronek, Project Manager (San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit) Anthony Foster, Research Associate David Levitan, Research Associate Sally Librera, Research Associate Jody Littlehales, Research Associate Technical Advisory Committee Members: Emmanuel Mekwunye, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Val Menotti, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Planning Department Jeff Ordway, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Real Estate Department Chuck Purvis, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Doug Sibley, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Research Firms: Corey, Canapary & Galanis, San Francisco, California MARI Hispanic Field Services, Santa Ana, California Taylor Research, San Diego, California i Travel Characteristics of TOD in California ii Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Executive Summary Rapid growth in the urbanized areas of California presents many transportation and land use challenges for local and regional policy makers.
[Show full text]
Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: a Literature Review
Transit Cooperative Research Program Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration RESEARCH RESULTS DIGEST October 2002—Number 52 Subject Area: VI Public Transit Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review This digest summarizes the literature review of TCRP Project H-27, “Transit-Oriented Development: State of the Practice and Future Benefits.” This digest provides definitions of transit-oriented development (TOD) and transit joint development (TJD), describes the institutional issues related to TOD and TJD, and provides examples of the impacts and benefits of TOD and TJD. References and an annotated bibliography are included. This digest was written by Robert Cervero, Christopher Ferrell, and Steven Murphy, from the Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. CONTENTS IV.2 Supportive Public Policies: Finance and Tax Policies, 46 I INTRODUCTION, 2 IV.3 Supportive Public Policies: Land-Based I.1 Defining Transit-Oriented Development, 5 Initiatives, 54 I.2 Defining Transit Joint Development, 7 IV.4 Supportive Public Policies: Zoning and I.3 Literature Review, 9 Regulations, 57 IV.5 Supportive Public Policies: Complementary II INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, 10 Infrastructure, 61 II.1 The Need for Collaboration, 10 IV.6 Supportive Public Policies: Procedural and II.2 Collaboration and Partnerships, 12 Programmatic Approaches, 61 II.3 Community Outreach, 12 IV.7 Use of Value Capture, 66 II.4 Government Roles, 14
[Show full text]
Commuting Include the New UW Research Park on Into Dane County Represented About a 33% Madison’S West Side, the Greentech Village Increase Compared to 2000
transit, particularly if developed with higher Around 40,000 workers commute into densities, mixed-uses, and pedestrian- Dane County from seven adjacent friendly designs. While most of the existing counties, according to 2006-2008 American peripheral centers have not been designed Community Survey (ACS) data. Of these, in this fashion, plans for many of the new about 22,600 commuted to the city of centers are more transit-supportive. These Madison. The number of workers commuting include the new UW Research Park on into Dane County represented about a 33% Madison’s west side, the GreenTech Village increase compared to 2000. While the 2006- and McGaw Neighborhood areas in the City 2008 and 2000 data sources aren’t directly of Fitchburg, and the Westside Neighborhood comparable, the numbers are consistent on the City of Sun Prairie’s southwest side. with past trends from decennial Census data. “Reverse commuting” from Dane Figure 6 shows the existing and planned County to adjacent counties did not show future major employment/activity centers the same increase. Around 8,400 commuted along with their projected 2035 employment. to adjacent counties, about the same as in The map illustrates the natural east-west 2000. Figure 7 shows work trip commuting to corridor that exists, within which future high- and from Dane County. capacity rapid transit service could connect many of these centers. Around 62,600 workers commuted to the city of Madison from other Dane County Commuting – Where We Work and communities in 2009, according to U.S. Census Longitudinal Employer-Household How We Get There Dynamics (LEHD) program data.
[Show full text]
Pascack Valley Line Timetable
Station location and parking information can be found at njtransit.com know before you go fare options Accessible Station Bus Route Community Shuttle Light Rail Travel Information Before starting your trip, Purchasing Tickets Ticket Prices saving you time and money Ticket Vending Machines are available at all stations AB AmeriBus CR Coach USA visit njtransit.com for updated service information tickets your way how much depends on how frequently & how far (Rockland Coaches) EZ EZ Ride/Meadowlink TOR Transport of Rockland TZX Tappan Zee Express P LINE and access to DepartureVision which provides your We want to make your travel convenient AB11C, CR11A, CR45, TOR59, ASCACK train track and status. You can also sign up for free My and economical, so we offer lots of options: TOR91, TOR92, TOR94, TOR-Loop3, Weekend, Holiday TZX Transit alerts to receive up-to-the-moment delay infor- on-board trains Monthly Passes Unlimited trips within a calendar month; can be SPRING VALLEY LEY mation on your cell phone or web-enabled mobile device, avoid Train personnel can accept cash only (no VA L New York Hoboken purchased beginning at 5:00 p.m. on the 19th of the month prior and are valid and Special Service AB11C, CR11A, CR20, Nanuet or via email. To learn about other methods we use to commu- bills over $20). All tickets purchased on- the $ L 5 until noon on the first commuting weekday of the following month. TOR59, TOR93 LEY nicate with you, visit njtransit.com/InTheKnow. alley VA board are subject to an additional $5 surcharge one-way one-way weekly monthly 10-trip one-way one-way weekly monthly 10-trip Information Zones STATIONS reduced reduced Weekly Passes Unlimited trips from 12:01 a.m.
[Show full text]
What Affects Commute Mode Choice: Neighborhood Physical Structure Or Preferences Toward Neighborhoods?
Journal of Transport Geography 13 (2005) 83–99 www.elsevier.com/locate/jtrangeo What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? Tim Schwanen a,*, Patricia L. Mokhtarian b a Urban and Regional Research Center Utrecht (URU), Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.115, 3508TC Utrecht, The Netherlands b Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Institute of Transportation Studies, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, Davis CA 95616, USA Abstract The academic literature on the impact of urban form on travel behavior has increasingly recognized that residential location choice and travel choices may be interconnected. We contribute to the understanding of this interrelation by studying to what extent commute mode choice differs by residential neighborhood and by neighborhood type dissonance—the mismatch between a com- muterÕs current neighborhood type and her preferences regarding physical attributes of the residential neighborhood. Using data from the San Francisco Bay Area, we find that neighborhood type dissonance is statistically significantly associated with commute mode choice: dissonant urban residents are more likely to commute by private vehicle than consonant urbanites but not quite as likely as true suburbanites. However, differences between neighborhoods tend to be larger than between consonant and dissonant residents within a neighborhood. Physical neighborhood structure thus appears to have an autonomous impact on commute mode choice. The analysis also shows that the impact of neighborhood type dissonance interacts with that of commutersÕ beliefs about automobile use, suggesting that these are to be reckoned with when studying the joint choices of residential location and commute mode.
[Show full text]
Office Development, Rail Transit, and Commuting Choices
Office Development, Rail Transit, and Commuting Choices Office Development, Rail Transit, and Commuting Choices Robert Cervero, University of California, Berkeley Abstract Decentralized employment growth has cut into transit ridership across the United States. In California, about 20 percent of those working in office buildings near rail stations regularly commute by transit, nearly three times transit’s modal share among those working away from rail stations. Mode choice models reveal that office workers are most likely to rail-commute if frequent feeder bus services are available, their employers help cover the cost of taking transit, and parking is in short sup- ply. Factors like trip-chaining and the absence of restaurants and retail shops near suburban offices, however, deter transit-commuting. Policy-makers can promote transit-commuting to offices near rail stops by flexing parking standards, introducing high-quality feeder buses, and initiating workplace incentives such as deeply dis- counted transit passes. While housing has generally been the focus of transit-oriented development, unless the other end of the commute trip—the workplace—is also convenient to transit, transit will continue to struggle in winning over commuters in an environment of increasingly decentralized employment growth. Introduction Transit oriented development (TOD)—compact, mixed-use development around transit stations—has gained popularity as a smart-growth strategy. A national survey recently identified more than 00 TODs across the United States that were self-identified by local transit-agency planners (Cervero et al. 004). TOD is arguably the most cogent form of smart growth: lay citizens and politicians alike 4 Journal of Public Transportation, Vol.
[Show full text]