DOCSLIB.ORG

List of State Routes in Jefferson County Select a Route to View Most Recent Traffic Counts for That Route Click Here for More Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of State Routes in Jefferson County Select a Route to View Most Recent Traffic Counts for That Route Click Here for More Information LIST OF STATE ROUTES IN JEFFERSON COUNTY SELECT A ROUTE TO VIEW MOST RECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS FOR THAT ROUTE CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION 3 177 3A 178 11 180 12 193 12E 232 12F 283 26 289 37 342 81I 411 126 970K 970L Clayton Village Loop 971H 971K Church St, James St, Market St 971P Kellog Hill Road 971Q Fort Drum Access Road #1 971V Fort Drum Access Road #2 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2003 Traffic Volume Report for JEFFERSON COUNTY Touring Section Start Description End Description Count Route Length Year AADT 3 2.64 OSWEGO CO LN S LANDING RD 03 1589 3 3.90 S LANDING RD RT 193 99 1325 3 5.67 RT 193 RT 178 ASPINWALL COR 03 1210 3 7.83 RT 178 ASPINWALL COR CR 75 SOUTH 98 1969 3 2.31 CR 75 SOUTH CR 75 NORTH 01 2330 3 1.25 CR 75 NORTH RT 180 BAGGS COR 03 3688 3 4.32 RT 180 BAGGS COR BOCES FLORA DR 01 4221 3 0.92 BOCES FLORA DR SALMON RUN MALL ENTRANCE 02 7525 3 0.30 SALMON RUN MALL ENTRANCE ACC RT 81I 98 22114 3 0.05 ACC RT 81I WATERTOWN W CITY LN 99 18758 3 0.82 CITY OF WATERTOWN BELLEW AVE 03 27677 3 0.73 BELLEW AVE MASSEY ST RT 11 SB JCT 03 26395 3 0.36 MASSEY ST RT 11 SB JCT START 11 NB OLAP 00 14456 3 0.08 START 11 NB OLAP END 11 NB OLAP START 12 OLAP 00 27761 3 1.04 END 11 NB OLAP START 12 OLAP PARK DRIVE 03 14134 3 0.40 PARK DRIVE END 12 OLAP 01 14029 3 0.60 END 12 OLAP HUNTINGTON ST 98 9712 3 0.17 HUNTINGTON ST WATERTOWN E CITY LN 03 8650 3 3.57 TOWN OF PAMELIA RT 342 03 6985 3 0.84 RT 342 MAIN ST BLACK RIVER 02 7412 3 1.89 MAIN ST BLACK RIVER STATE SPUR RT 971V 03 5841 3 0.36 STATE SPUR RT 971V CR 143 FELTS MILLS 01 7494 3 2.23 CR 143 FELTS MILLS RT 26 GREAT BEND 02 6495 3 1.85 RT 26 GREAT BEND RT 3A DEFERIET 03 6289 3 4.97 RT 3A DEFERIET PLAZA DRIVE 02 3025 3 0.49 PLAZA DRIVE N MECHANIC ST 03 4040 3 0.27 N MECHANIC ST START 126 OLAP CARTHAGE 01 3389 3 0.07 START 126 OLAP CARTHAGE END 126 OLAP CARTHAGE 02 9662 3 0.14 END 126 OLAP CARTHAGE S WASHINGTON ST 03 7460 3 0.77 S WASHINGTON ST CARTHAGE N VILL LN 01 5645 3 3.05 CARTHAGE N VILL LN RT 3A FARGO 02 2187 3 5.56 RT 3A FARGO LEWIS CO LN 03 2887 3A 0.91 RT 3 DEFERIET CR 37 RD TO HERRINGS 01 2026 3A 4.27 CR 37 RD TO HERRINGS RT 3 FARGO END 3A 02 1949 11 0.89 OSWEGO CO LINE ACC RT 81I NB 02 1276 11 1.76 ACC RT 81I NB TOWN OF ELLISBURG AND VILLAG 98 1615 11 1.97 TOWN OF ELLISBURG AND VILLAG RT 193 PIERREPONT MANR 01 1749 11 5.23 RT 193 PIERREPONT MANR CR 189 ADAMS 03 2186 11 0.38 CR 189 ADAMS RT 178 JCT ADAMS 03 4647 11 3.68 RT 178 JCT ADAMS RT 177 ADAMS CTR 01 6199 11 2.03 RT 177 ADAMS CTR ACC RT 81I KELLOG HILL 99 3603 11 4.26 ACC RT 81I KELLOG HILL RT 232 03 4196 11 1.77 RT 232 WATERTOWN S CITY LN 99 11648 11 0.83 CITY OF WATERTOWN CHESTNUT ST 01 11380 11 0.52 CHESTNUT ST PADDOCK ST RT 11 SB JCT 99 12986 11 0.47 PADDOCK ST RT 11 SB JCT START 3 OLAP 03 11412 11 0.08 START 3 OLAP END 3 OLP START 12 OLAPS 00 27761 11 0.03 END 3 OLP START 12 OLAPS JCT RT 283 98 17265 11 0.33 JCT RT 283 END 12 OLAP W MAIN ST 02 7394 11 0.97 END 12 OLAP W MAIN ST JCT RT 11 SB 03 8942 11 0.65 JCT RT 11 SB RT 37 01 12199 11 3.87 RT 37 RT 342 03 8819 11 1.44 RT 342 JCT RT 971Q FT DRUM 03 15183 11 3.00 JCT RT 971Q FT DRUM START 26 OLAP EVANS MILLS-CR 02 9188 11 5.98 START 26 OLAP EVANS MILLS-CR CR 29 PHILADELPHIA 98 6711 11 1.05 CR 29 PHILADELPHIA END 26 OLAP PHILADELPHIA 01 8149 11 5.40 END 26 OLAP PHILADELPHIA CR 194 ANTWERP 02 6289 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2003 Traffic Volume Report for JEFFERSON COUNTY Touring Section Start Description End Description Count Route Length Year AADT 11 5.69 CR 194 ANTWERP ST LAWRENCE CO LN 98 5261 12 4.91 LEWIS CO LINE CR 161 TYLERVILLE RD 99 3379 12 3.11 CR 161 TYLERVILLE RD CR 156 BURRVILLE 98 3497 12 1.68 CR 156 BURRVILLE CR 159 GOTHAM ST 01 4587 12 1.05 CR 159 GOTHAM ST RT 126 98 4837 12 0.36 RT 126 START RT 3 OLAP 01 9613 12 0.40 START RT 3 OLAP PARK DR 01 14029 12 1.04 PARK DR END RT 3 OLP START RT 11 OLA 03 14134 12 0.03 END RT 3 OLP START RT 11 OLA JCT RT 283 98 17265 12 0.33 JCT RT 283 END RT 11 OLAP E MAIN ST 02 7394 12 0.34 END RT 11 OLAP E MAIN ST LERAY ST JCT RT 11 SB 01 8297 12 0.24 LERAY ST JCT RT 11 SB RT 12E BRADLEY ST 99 13381 12 0.84 RT 12E BRADLEY ST WATERTOWN N CITY LINE 03 8994 12 0.37 TOWN OF PAMELIA ACC RT 81I 99 8769 12 2.12 ACC RT 81I RT 342 01 5756 12 5.85 RT 342 RT 180 GUNN COR 02 4391 12 4.42 RT 180 GUNN COR CR 12 DEPAULVILLE 98 3490 12 7.19 CR 12 DEPAULVILLE RT 12E CLAYTON SPUR 970L 99 3111 12 5.11 RT 12E CLAYTON SPUR 970L RT 180 FISHERS LANDING 02 2778 12 2.01 RT 180 FISHERS LANDING ACC RT 81I 03 3595 12 3.98 ACC RT 81I RT 26 ALEX BAY 03 6287 12 0.71 RT 26 ALEX BAY SWAN HOLLOW RD 02 2831 12 2.07 SWAN HOLLOW RD LOG HILL RD 03 2911 12 3.37 LOG HILL RD ST LAWRENCE CO LN 99 2967 12E 0.50 RT 12 VANDUZEE ST 99 7673 12E 0.33 VANDUZEE ST WATERTOWN N CITY LN 03 4232 12E 2.96 JEFFERSON CO TOWN OF PAMELIA JCT RT 971H 01 3472 12E 2.27 JCT RT 971H CR 53 GAME FARM RD 99 5729 12E 1.72 CR 53 GAME FARM RD RT 180 LIMERICK 03 5205 12E 2.21 RT 180 LIMERICK CR 59 01 4948 12E 2.37 CR 59 CR 125 02 4846 12E 0.67 CR 125 CR 179 CHAUMONT 03 6247 12E 0.80 CR 179 CHAUMONT CR 8 CHAUMONT 01 4691 12E 4.40 CR 8 CHAUMONT CR 57 02 2696 12E 6.41 CR 57 CR 6 CAPE VINCENT 03 1132 12E 8.25 CR 6 CAPE VINCENT CR 9 RD TO ST LAWRENCE 01 1417 12E 4.67 CR 9 RD TO ST LAWRENCE CR 4 CRYSTAL SPRING RD 02 2074 12E 2.09 CR 4 CRYSTAL SPRING RD RT 12 CLAYTON END 12E 03 3598 12F 3.25 RT 180 DEXTER ROUTE 971H JCT - PADDY HILL 01 3561 12F 1.88 ROUTE 971H JCT - PADDY HILL SALMON RUN MALL ENTRANCE 02 7822 12F 0.16 SALMON RUN MALL ENTRANCE ACC RT 81I 03 16238 12F 0.08 ACC RT 81I WATERTOWN W CITY LN 01 13961 12F 0.67 JEFFERSON CO TWN WATERTOWN C BELLEW ST 03 16463 12F 0.22 BELLEW ST VANDUZEE ST 03 9323 12F 0.47 VANDUZEE ST CITY CENTER DRIVE 01 13803 12F 0.16 CITY CENTER DRIVE MASSEY ST END 12F 01 8792 26 0.36 LEWIS CO LINE START 126 OLAP 03 4710 26 0.79 START 126 OLAP END 126 OLAP 03 5648 26 0.26 END 126 OLAP W CARTHAGE VILL LN 03 7326 26 5.82 W CARTHAGE VILL LN RT 3 GREAT BEND 03 4755 26 0.64 RT 3 GREAT BEND CR 37 03 6903 26 4.67 CR 37 START 11 OLAP EVANS MILLS-CR 01 3550 26 6.67 START 11 OLAP EVANS MILLS-CR SANDY HOLLOW RD 98 6711 26 0.36 SANDY HOLLOW RD END 11 OLAP PHILADELPHIA 01 8149 26 5.45 END 11 OLAP PHILADELPHIA TWN THERESA VILLAGE THERESA 03 1579 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2003 Traffic Volume Report for JEFFERSON COUNTY Touring Section Start Description End Description Count Route Length Year AADT 26 1.49 TWN THERESA VILLAGE THERESA CR 193 OLD RT 26 THERESA 01 2949 26 1.13 CR 193 OLD RT 26 THERESA RT 411 START 37 OLAP 02 1399 26 0.89 RT 411 START 37 OLAP CR 193 OLD RT 26 98 3424 26 1.71 CR 193 OLD RT 26 END 37 OLAP 01 4269 26 4.66 END 37 OLAP CR 192 BROWN'S CORS 03 1606 26 3.70 CR 192 BROWN'S CORS RT 12 ALEX BAY END 26 99 2754 37 2.66 RT 11 JEFFERSON CO RT 342 99 2979 37 11.21 RT 342 CR 136 03 2869 37 2.04 CR 136 RT 411 START 26 OLAP 01 2659 37 0.89 RT 411 START 26 OLAP CR 193 OLD RT 26 98 3424 37 1.71 CR 193 OLD RT 26 END 26 OLAP 01 4269 37 4.17 END 26 OLAP CR 192 REDWOOD 02 2994 37 4.49 CR 192 REDWOOD ST LAWRENCE CO LN 03 3348 81I 0.70 OSWEGO CO LINE EXIT 38 ACC RT 11 03 15768 81I 2.03 EXIT 38 ACC RT 11 EXIT 39 ACC MANNSVILLE RD 03 17122 81I 1.88 EXIT 39 ACC MANNSVILLE RD EXIT 40 ACC RT 193 01 14923 81I 5.56 EXIT 40 ACC RT 193 EXIT 41 ACC RT 178 02 14596 81I 4.13 EXIT 41 ACC RT 178 EXIT 42 ACC RT 177 00 12408 81I 1.55 EXIT 42 ACC RT 177 EXIT 43 ACC KELLOGG HILL RD 01 16856 81I 2.36 EXIT 43 ACC KELLOGG HILL RD EXIT 44 ACC RT 232 03 18663 81I 4.31 EXIT 44 ACC RT 232 EXIT 45 ACC RT 3 03 16471 81I 0.97 EXIT 45 ACC RT 3 EXIT 46 ACC RT 12F 99 21337 81I 1.48 EXIT 46 ACC RT 12F EXIT 47 ACC RT 12 97 20548 81I 2.62 EXIT 47 ACC RT 12 EXIT 48 ACC RT 342 01 18063 81I 11.50 EXIT 48 ACC RT 342 EXIT 49 ACC RT 411 03 9295 81I 8.97 EXIT 49 ACC RT 411 EXIT 50 ACC RT 12 02 8982 81I 1.66 EXIT 50 ACC RT 12 EXIT 51 ACC CR 100 03 5593 81I 3.23 EXIT 51 ACC CR 100 EXIT 52 ACC CR 191 03 3504 81I 0.49 EXIT 52 ACC CR 191 U S -CANADIAN LINE 03 5700 126 0.42 RT 12 WATERTOWN WEAVER RD 03 6133 126 0.70 WEAVER RD CR 49 RUTLAND HOLLOW RD 01 4928 126 4.94 CR 49 RUTLAND HOLLOW RD CR 163 PLANK RD 02 4585 126 3.52 CR 163 PLANK RD CR 47 03 4382 126 3.28 CR 47 START RT 26 OLAP 99 4050 126 0.79 START RT 26 OLAP END 26 OLAP 03 5648 126 0.60 END 26 OLAP CHAMPION ST 01 7254 126 0.53 CHAMPION ST START RT 3 OLAP 02 10932 126 0.07 START RT 3 OLAP END 3 OLAP 02 9662 126 1.07 END 3 OLAP CARTHAGE VILLAGE LN 03 1863 126 0.83 CARTHAGE VILLAGE LN LEWIS CO LN 01 3036 177 0.83 RT 81I AT FENCE LINE-WEST OF RT 11 ADAMS CTR 99 4171 177 3.32 RT 11 ADAMS CTR CR 69 RODMAN 03 3008 177 4.71 CR 69 RODMAN CR 189 BABBITS CORS 01 2173 177 1.05 CR 189 BABBITS CORS LEWIS CO LINE 98 1390 178 1.02 RT 3 TOWN BARN RD 03 1727 178 4.08 TOWN BARN RD CR 75 ROBERTS CORNERS 01 816 178 1.43 CR 75 ROBERTS CORNERS RT 289 02 1016 178 3.14 RT 289 RT 81I OVER ADAMS BINS 10320 03 2774 178 0.56 RT 81I OVER ADAMS BINS 10320 RT 11 ADAMS END 178 01 4789 180 3.23 RT 3 RT 12F 99 2307 180 0.37 RT 12F CR 59 DEXTER 03 4002 180 1.57 CR 59 DEXTER RT 12E LIMERICK 01 2250 180 5.36 RT 12E LIMERICK ROUTE 12 JUNCTION 02 856 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2003 Traffic Volume Report for JEFFERSON COUNTY Touring Section Start Description End Description Count Route Length Year AADT 180 7.58 ROUTE 12 JUNCTION RT 411 LAFARGEVILLE 03 1243 180 3.24 RT 411 LAFARGEVILLE CR3 DELAFARGE CRS 99 1332 180 3.15 CR3 DELAFARGE CRS RT 12 END 180 02 1066 193 4.28 RT 3 RT 289 ELLISBURG 03 596 193 3.36 RT 289 ELLISBURG BIN 1032000 & 1094690 OVER 8 01 1166 193 0.89 BIN 1032000 & 1094690 OVER 8 RT 11 END 193 02 779 232 2.44 ACC RT 81I
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Intelligent Transportation Systems (Its) Plan for Canada: En Route to Intelligent Mobility
    Transport Transports TP 13501 E Canada Canada AN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN FOR CANADA: EN ROUTE TO INTELLIGENT MOBILITY November 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................5 2. ADDRESSING TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES.............................................5 3. WHAT ARE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS?..............................7 4. BENEFITS OF ITS....................................................................................................9 5. AN ITS PLAN FOR CANADA - VISION AND SCOPE ..........................................12 6. MISSION: EN ROUTE TO INTELLIGENT MOBILITY .........................................14 7. OBJECTIVES .........................................................................................................14 8. PILLARS OF THE ITS PLAN.................................................................................17 9. MILESTONES.........................................................................................................27 10. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................30 APPENDIX A ........................................................................................................... i An ITS Plan for Canada: En Route to Intelligent Mobility An ITS Plan for Canada: En Route to Intelligent
    [Show full text]
  • Navigation Signing for Roundabouts
    SAIC N N a a t t Bryan J. Katz, PE, PTOE i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o May 24, 2005 Vail, Colorado u u t t C C o o Study Performed for: n n f f e e Roundabouts r r e e n n SAIC c c e e 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 TRB National Roundabouts Conference D D Traffic Control Devices Pooled Fund Study Navigation Signing for R R A A Vaughan W. Inman, PhD. F F T T N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o u u Problem t t C C o o n n f f e e r r e e n n c c e e 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 rowing and Widespread Adoption of o Standard for Navigation Signing at D D R R Roundabouts Roundabouts G N A A F F • • T T N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o u u t t C C Approach o o n n f f e e r r e e n n c c e e 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 onduct Laboratory Evaluation of tate of Practice Review Roundabout election of Four Representative D D R R Navigation Signage Signing Approaches for Evaluation Comprehension of Representative Signs C S S A A F F • • • T T N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o u u k t t C C r o o n n o f Alternatives f Four Signing e e r r e e n n Y c c e e 2 2 w 0 0 0 0 aryland onventional iagrammatic e 5 5 D D R R C M D A A F F • • • •N T T N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o u u t t C C o o n n f f e e r r e e n n c c e e 2 2 Conventional 0 0 0 0 5 5 D D R R A A F F T T Route Number Shields on One Assembly, Destination Names on Separate Guide Sign N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o u u t t C C o o n n f f Maryland e e r
    [Show full text]
  • South Gloucestershire Council Public Consultation Cycling City Route
    South Gloucestershire Council Public Consultation Cycling City Route Number 7 – Ring Road Path Background In June 2008 South Gloucestershire Council, jointly with Bristol City Council, were chosen as Britain’s first Cycling City. Government funding totalling £11.4 million has been awarded to the area to transform cycling infrastructure and to pioneer innovative ways of making cycling a real transport option for more residents. This funding will be matched by Bristol and South Gloucestershire councils and their partners creating a total scheme value of £22.8 million. The aim of the Cycling City project is to double the number of cyclists in the Greater Bristol area. To do this we need to promote and encourage cycling through better infrastructure, training and promotion. The Cycling City project will implement safe, continuous, attractive, comfortable and coherent routes across the project area. This route has been designed with the help of the South Gloucestershire cycle forum. The forum is a group of regular cyclists who have worked with engineers to ensure the proposed route is suitable and to overcome current problems on the route. Route Cycling City Route 7 will run predominantly along the A4174 Ring Road off-road cycle path from the Dramway Roundabout (junction with B4465 Shortwood Hill), to the Bristol City Council boundary in the vicinity of Southmead Hospital (i.e. Kenmore Drive). Although the westernmost section of the route is located away from the Ring Road corridor, continuous direction signing as far as Southmead Hospital will be provided as part of the Cycling City route signing proposals. This route will provide a total length of approximately 10km of predominantly off-carriageway cycle facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 LIMITED ACCESS STATE NUMBERED HIGHWAYS As of December 31, 2020
    2021 LIMITED ACCESS STATE NUMBERED HIGHWAYS As of December 31, 2020 CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF Transportation BUREAU OF POLICY AND PLANNING Office of Roadway Information Systems Roadway INVENTORY SECTION INTRODUCTION Each year, the Roadway Inventory Section within the Office of Roadway Information Systems produces this document entitled "Limited Access - State Numbered Highways," which lists all the limited access state highways in Connecticut. Limited access highways are defined as those that the Commissioner, with the advice and consent of the Governor and the Attorney General, designates as limited access highways to allow access only at highway intersections or designated points. This is provided by Section 13b-27 of the Connecticut General Statutes. This document is distributed within the Department of Transportation and the Division Office of the Federal Highway Administration for information and use. The primary purpose to produce this document is to provide a certified copy to the Office of the State Traffic Administration (OSTA). The OSTA utilizes this annual listing to comply with Section 14-298 of the Connecticut General Statutes. This statute, among other directives, requires the OSTA to publish annually a list of limited access highways. In compliance with this statute, each year the OSTA publishes the listing on the Department of Transportation’s website (http://www.ct.gov/dot/osta). The following is a complete listing of all state numbered limited access highways in Connecticut and includes copies of Connecticut General Statute Section 13b-27 (Limited Access Highways) and Section 14-298 (Office of the State Traffic Administration). It should be noted that only those highways having a State Route Number, State Road Number, Interstate Route Number or United States Route Number are listed.
    [Show full text]
  • Test Centre Route
    Test Centre Route Name of Practical Test Centre…………Hornchurch Type of Test Route………………………Car Route Number …………………………..21 Date of Last Review..............................January 2007 Name/ Number of Road Direction DTC 2nd right Devonshire Rd Right Devonshire Rd EOR left Abbs Cross Lane 3rd right Elm Park Avenue Roundabout left 1st exit The Broadway Roundabout right 3rd exit Rosewood Avenue 2nd roundabout ahead EOR right Wood Lane EOR right Rainham Rd Becomes Upper Rainham Rd One way system left Roneo Corner 1st right Rom Valley Way Roundabout right 4th exit Oldchurch Rd T/L left South St Roundabout right 3rd exit Victoria Rd Becomes Heath Park Rd Roundabout right 4th exit Slewins Lane 5th right Walden Way EOR left Wykeham Avenue EOR right Butts Green Rd One way system left North St EOR left High St One way system right DTC Glossary: EOR – End of Road T/L - Traffic Lights Please note that any route is subject to alteration at the discretion of the examiner Test Centre Route Name of Practical Test Route…………………..Hornchurch Type of Test Route……………………………….Car Route Number…………………………………….22 Date of Last Review...........................................January 2007 Name/Number of Road Direction DTC One way system 2nd right North St Ahead one way system Becomes Butts Green Rd 1st right Berther Rd EOR left Nelmes Rd 3rd right Sylvan Avenue EOR left Wingletye Lane EOR left A127 (W) T/L right Squirrels Heath Rd 1st right Redden Court Rd 1st right A127 (E) 1st exit Hall Lane Roundabout left 1st exit Avon Rd 5th right Marlborough Gardens Becomes Marlborough
    [Show full text]
  • Kolkata Stretcar Track
    to BANDEL JN. and DANKUNI JN. to NAIHATI JN. to BARASAT JN. Kolkata 22./23.10.2004 M DUM DUM Streetcar track map: driving is on the left r in operation / with own right-of-way the second track from the right tracks seeming to be operable e is used to make the turns of the regular passenger trains track trunks which are not operable v other routes in 1996 according to Tasker i other suspended routes according to CTC map TALA 11 [13] R actual / former route number according to CTC ULTADANGA ROAD Suburban trains and ‘Circular Railway’ according to Narayanan: Galif [12] i BELGATCHIA in operation under construction l Street [13] 1 2 11 PATIPUKUR A.P.C. Rd[ 20 ] M Note: The route along the Hugly River can’t be confirmed by my own g 12 Belgatchia observations. Bagbazar SHYAM BAZAR R.G. Kar Rd u BAG BAZAR M M metro railway pb pedestrian bridge 1 2 [4] 11 H Shyambazar BIDHAN NAGAR ROAD pb TIKIAPARA [8] 5 SOVA SOVA BAZAR – M BAZAR 6 AHIRITOLA Bidhan Nagar to PANSKURA JN. Aurobinda Sarani 17 housing block [4] 20 20 [12] [13] [ 12 ] 17 loop Esplanade [10] Rabindra Setu Nimtala enlargement (Howrah Bridge) pb [4] 1 [8] GIRISH 2 Howrah [10] M PARK 5 BURRA 6 15 Bidhan Sarani Rabindra Sarani 11 BAZAR 11 12 20 [21] [26] V.I.P. Rd 15 HOWRAH 11 12 M.G. 30Rd MAHATMA Maniktala Main Rd RAILWAY GANDHI 20 30 Acharya Profullya Chandra Rd STATION M ROAD M.G. Rd 20 Howrah [16] 17 17 Northbound routes are [12] [13] [16] M turning counterclockwise, Bridge 15 Mahatma Gandhi Rd 20 20 southbound routes are [4] 11 12 15 17 [ 12 ] 17 ESPLANADE 12 20 turning clockwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a New York State Reference (900) Series Routes
    Appendix A New York State Reference (900) Series Routes Appendix A - New York State Reference (900) Series Routes 2011 NYSDOT Traffic Data Report New York State Reference (900 Series) Routes “Reference routes” are highways which are owned by or of interest to the New York State Department of Transportation. These highways are not designated as touring routes. Touring routes are Interstates, US routes, and NY routes. These highways are referenced as “900 series” routes with the route number constructed as follows: 1st digit is a 9 2nd digit generally represents the NYSDOT Region 3rd digit is 0 to 5 unless it is a service road (6) or a parkway (7, 8, or 9) 4th character is a letter Reference routes can also include other major non-NYSDOT highways that are not touring routes, major parkways (regardless of ownership), short highways connecting touring routes, short pieces or the entirety of former touring routes, other highways built or rebuilt and then retained by NYSDOT, and one leg of a “Y” intersection of a signed touring route. Appendix A - New York State Reference (900) Series Routes 2011 NYSDOT Traffic Data Report Route Description 900B Glen Cove Road 900C Orient State Park Entrance 900D Oakley Street 900F Union Turnpike 900G Triborough Bridge Manhattan Connector 900J Cross Bay Bridge 900P Jericho Turnpike 900V Nassau Expressway 900W SH 1274: Montauk Highway 901A Hauppauge Center Road 901B Marine Pkwy Bridge – Queens County Line to Tollgate 901B Marine Pkwy Bridge – Rockaway Pt Blvd to Kings County line 901C Doughty Boulevard 906A L.I.E. EB Service Road 906B L.I.E.
    [Show full text]
  • FDM 4-1 Introduction and Definitions
    Facilities Development Manual Wisconsin Department of Transportation Chapter 4 Highway Systems Section 1 Introduction and Definitions FDM 4-1-1 Background July 2, 1979 From the early territorial days and through several decades of statehood, the development and improvement of highways was strictly a function of the local governments (towns and counties). With the enactment of the revised statutes of 1849, the Legislature had conferred sufficient authority on the counties and towns for the location, construction, and maintenance of all public highways deemed necessary. It was evident that then, as now, the development and upkeep of highways was a heavy financial obligation, and assistance from the state was sought. The state government, although it had always encouraged the development of good roads, could extend no assistance to the local governments because of a constitutional provision prohibiting the state from participating in works of internal improvement. The constitutional amendment of 1908 gave authority to the state government to participate in works of internal improvement. This was shortly followed in 1911 by the creation of the State Highway Commission. From that time to the present a modern network of highways, roads, and streets has evolved to accommodate the transportation needs of Wisconsin. The present system consists of the State Trunk Highway System, local roads (including county trunk highways and town roads), and city streets. These are all classified into the various functional categories in accordance with their traffic-handling and service characteristics. Upon the local road, city street, and state trunk highway systems are superimposed the various statutory categories and funding systems, all of which will be treated in this Chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Characteristics Field Descriptions Updated for the 2014 2Nd Quarter Publication
    Road Characteristics Field Descriptions Updated for the 2014 2nd Quarter Publication Notes: _X_ indicates that the definition is stated once but applies to the dominant route and each co-route. The LRS supports a dominant route (1) and up to 5 additional co-routes (2 – 6) for each segment. For example, the definition for RTE_X_CLSS_CD applies to all of the following fields: RTE_1_CLSS_CD (the dominant route), RTE_2_CLSS_CD, RTE_3_CLSS_CD, RTE_4_CLSS_CD, RTE_5_CLSS_CD and RTE_6_CLSS_CD. The Data Owner is the group that is responsible for maintaining that data item. There may be one or more additional business owners associated with that information, but the Data Owner should be the first group to contact when there is a question about the data in Road Characteristics. Domains are represented as coded values and descriptions. The geodatabase version of the file contains the descriptions. The shapefile version contains the values, which tend to be abbreviated or numeric versions of the description. If the geodatabase table is exported, the resulting table will contain the values. Road Characteristics is a dual-carriageway system meaning that divided roads (roads with medians) are represented as two separate lines and undivided roads are represented as a single line. This allows for different characteristics to be coded on each side of the route. On divided roads, most characteristics apply to just that side of the road. When doing mileage calculations, only the inventory side of divided routes should be counted. However if the road is a couplet, then both sides should be counted as couplets are treated like individual routes. The One-way Direction Flag field should be used to determine if the road is divided or not.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Department of Transportation Highway Functional
    Ohio Department of Transportation Highway Functional Classification System Concepts, Procedures and Instructions Introduction This document provides recommended guidance for assigning functional classification to roadways and streets within Ohio. It is based on Highway Functional Classification: Concepts, Criteria and Procedures, 2013 Edition published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), which can be downloaded from the following link: www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/processes/statewide/related/highway_functional_classifications The Purpose for Classifying Highways Highway functional classification is used to determine which roads, streets and highways are eligible for federal transportation funds. It is used to establish design criteria for various roadway features, and also serves as a management tool to measure a route’s importance in project selection and program management. Highway Functional Classification Concepts Most vehicle travel occurs through a network of interdependent roadways, with each roadway segment moving traffic through the system towards destinations. The concept of functional classification defines the role a particular roadway segment plays in serving this flow of traffic. Roadways are assigned to one of the seven (7) classifications within a hierarchy, as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 below, according to the character of travel service each roadway provides. Note in both the table and graphic each roadway classification is color-coded. These colors are used on ODOT highway functional classification maps for
    [Show full text]
  • 747 West Coast to Burnie
    EFFECTIVE 10 MARCH 2019 747 West Coast to Burnie ROUTE NUMBER ROUTE 747 West Coast to Burnie BUS ROUTE MAP Continues below right Burnie Legend Interchange 747 Route 747 N Bass Hwy North Tce Alexander St Variant of route 747 L Map reference Cattley St Interchange West Park Gr Bass Hwy Hospital K Hellyer Educational institution College Wilson St Murchison Hwy Belvoir Rd BURNIE Shopping centre Mooreville Rd Map not to scale Mount St Old Surrey Rd Three Mile Line Rd West Mooreville Rd Pieman Rd Ridgley Hwy RIDGLEY Queen St J West Ridgley Rd Murchison Hwy F TULLAH 747 Kay St Oonah Rd I Arthur St Agnes St HIGHCLERE E Murchison Hwy ROSEBERY Ridgley Hwy Anthony Rd Westwood St Murchison Hwy Oonah Rd Talunah Rd Upper Natone Rd Shield St H Hwy n a h e HAMPSHIRE e Z King St D Main St ZEEHAN 747 Ridgley Hwy Henty Rd Zeehan Hwy Anthony Rd Murchison Hwy Lyell Hwy Lyell Hwy Lyell Hwy West Coast Orr St Hospital B C St Joseph’s Catholic School WARATAH Ridgley Hwy Strahan 747 Andrew St Esplanade STRAHAN Cutten St 747 Camp Rd Harvey St Dixon St G Sticht St Reid St Drield St Smith St Waratah Rd A Harold St Lovett St QUEENSTOWN Innes St W Bay St C Hall St Mountain Heights William St Esplanade School Conlan St Murchison Hwy Continues above left WHO OPERATES 747 MY SERVICE? tassielink.com.au 1300 300 520 Online trip information transport.tas.gov.au EFFECTIVE 10 MARCH 2019 747 747 from West Coast towards Burnie Monday to Friday map ref ROUTE NUMBER 747 am A Strahan, Esplanade/Harold St 7:30 B Queenstown Station, Driffield St 8:20 C St Joseph’s/Mountain Heights
    [Show full text]
  • A Literature Study on National Highway System
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Journal of Innovative Technology and Research (IJITR) Aishwarya B R* et al. (IJITR) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH Volume No.4, Issue No.6, October – November 2016, 5010-5013. A Literature Study On National Highway System AISHWARYA B R PG Student Department of Computer Science and Engineering R V College of Engineering, Bengaluru-560059 Abstract: As one of the components of the National Highway System, Interstate Highways improve the mobility of military troops to and from airports, seaports, rail terminals, and other military bases. Interstate Highways also connect to other roads that are a part of the Strategic Highway Network, a system of roads identified as critical to the U.S. Department of Defense. The system has also been used to facilitate evacuations in the face of hurricanes and other natural disasters. An option for maximizing traffic throughput on a highway is to reverse the flow of traffic on one side of a divider so that all lanes become outbound lanes. This procedure, known as contraflow lane reversal, has been employed several times for hurricane evacuations. After public outcry regarding the inefficiency of evacuating from southern Louisiana prior to Hurricane Georges' landfall in September 1998, government officials looked towards contraflow to improve evacuation times. In Savannah, Georgia, and Charleston, South Carolina, in 1999, lanes of I-16 and I-26 were used in a contraflow configuration in anticipation of Hurricane Floyd with mixed results. In 2004 contraflow was employed ahead of Hurricane Charley in the Tampa, Florida area and on the Gulf Coast before the landfall of Hurricane Ivan; however, evacuation times there were no better than previous evacuation operations.
    [Show full text]