Rhododendrons, Possibly the Most Water from Mountain Streams
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Status of Galliformes in Pipar Pheasant Reserve and Santel, Annapurna, Nepal
Status of Galliformes in Pipar Pheasant Reserve and Santel, Annapurna, Nepal 1 2 3 4 LAXMAN P. POUDYAL *, NAVEEN K. MAHATO , PARAS B. SINGH , POORNESWAR SUBEDI , HEM S. BARAL 5 and PHILIP J. K. MCGOWAN 6 1 Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, PO Box 860, Babarmahal, Kathmandu, Nepal. 2 Red Panda Network – Nepal, PO Box 21477, Kathmandu, Nepal. 3 Biodiversity Conservation Society, PO Box 24304, Kathmandu, Nepal. 4 Department of Forests, Kathmandu, Nepal. 5 Bird Conservation Nepal, PO Box 12465, Lazimpat, Kathmandu, Nepal. 6 World Pheasant Association, Newcastle University Biology Field Station, Close House Estate, Heddon on the Wall, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE15 0HT UK. *Correspondence author - [email protected] Paper presented at the 4 th International Galliformes Symposium, 2007, Chengdu, China. Abstract The Galliformes of Pipar have been surveyed seven times between 1979 and 1998. The nearby area of Santel was surveyed using comparable methods in 2001. In continuance of the long- term monitoring at Pipar and to provide a second count at Santel, dawn call counts were conducted in both areas, using the same survey points as previous surveys, between 29 th April and 9 th May 2005. The aim of those surveys was to collect information on the status of pheasants and partridges and to look for any changes over time. In both areas, galliform numbers were higher in 2005 than in previous surveys, for most species. For each species there was no evidence of decline since the first counts were conducted nearly 30 years ago. Both areas provide good habitat for Galliformes and disturbance is not a serious issue. -
MONITORING PHEASANTS (Phasianidae) in the WESTERN HIMALAYAS to MEASURE the IMPACT of HYDRO-ELECTRIC PROJECTS
THE RING 33, 1-2 (2011) DOI 10.2478/v10050-011-0003-7 MONITORING PHEASANTS (Phasianidae) IN THE WESTERN HIMALAYAS TO MEASURE THE IMPACT OF HYDRO-ELECTRIC PROJECTS Virat Jolli, Maharaj K. Pandit ABSTRACT Jolli V., Pandit M.K. 2011. Monitoring pheasants (Phasianidae) in the Western Himalayas to measure the impact of hydro-electric projects. Ring 33, 1-2: 37-46. In this study, we monitored pheasants abundance to measure the impact of a hydro- electric development project. The pheasants abundance was monitored using “call count” and line transect methods during breeding seasons in 2009-2011. Three call count stations and 3 transects were laid with varying levels of anthropogenic disturbance. To understand how the hydro power project could effect the pheasant population in the Jiwa Valley, we monitored it under two conditions; in the presence of hydro-electric project (HEP) con- struction and when human activity significantly declined. The Koklass Pheasant (Pucrasia macrolopha), Cheer Pheasant (Catreus wallichi) and Western Tragopan (Tragopan melano- cephalus) were not recorded in Manjhan Adit in 2009. During 2010 and 2011 springs, the construction activity was temporarily discontinued in Manjhan Adit. The pheasants re- sponded positively to this and their abundance increased near disturbed sites (Manjhan Adit). The strong response of pheasants to anthropogenic disturbance has ecological appli- cation and thus can be used by wildlife management in the habitat quality monitoring in the Himalayan Mountains. V. Jolli (corresponding author), M.K. Pandit, Centre for Inter-disciplinary Studies of Mountain and Hill Environment, Academic Research Building, Patel Road, Univ. of Delhi, Delhi, India, E-mail: [email protected] Key words: call count, anthropogenic disturbance, pheasant, monitoring, hydro-electric project INTRODUCTION Birds have been used extensively in environment and habitat quality monitoring. -
Restricted Bird Species List221.04 KB
RESTRICTED BIRD LICENCE CATEGORIES Exempt Birds - If these species are the only birds kept, no permit is required Canary, Common, Serinus canaria Ground-dove, White-bibbed; Pigeon, White- Pigeon, Domestic; Rock Dove, Columba livia breasted Ground; Jobi Island Dove, Gallicolumba jobiensis Cardinal, Red-crested, Paroaria coronata Guineafowl, Helmeted, Numida meleagris Pigeon, Luzon Bleeding Heart, Gallicolumba luzonica Chicken; Domestic Fowl; all bantams; Red Jungle Fowl, Parrotfinch, Red-throated; Red-faced Parrotfinch, Pytilia, Crimson-winged; Aurora Finch, Pytilia Gallus gallus Erythrura psittacea phoenicoptera Duck, domestic breeds only, Anas spp. Peafowl, Common; Indian Peafowl, Pavo cristatus Pytilia, Green-winged; Melba Finch, Pytilia melba Duck, Mallard; Mallard, Anas platyrhynchos Peafowl, Green, Pavo muticus Swan, Mute; White Swan, Cygnus olor Duck, Muscovy, Cairina moschata Pheasant, Golden, Chrysolophus pictus Turkey, Common, Meleagris gallopavo Firefinch, Red-billed, Lagonosticta senegala Pheasant, Himalayan Monal; Impeyan Pheasant, Turtle-Dove, Laughing, Streptopelia senegalensis Lophophorus impejanus Goldfinch; European Goldfinch, Carduelis carduelis Pheasant, Kalij, Lophura leucomelanos Turtle-Dove, Spotted, Streptopelia chinensis Goose, All Domestic Strains, Anser anser Pheasant, Lady Amherst's, Chrysolophus Waxbill, Lavender; Lavender Finch, Estrilda amherstiae caerulescens Goose, Swan; Chinese Goose, Anser cygnoides Pheasant, Reeves's, Syrmaticus reevesii Waxbill, Zebra; Golden-breasted Waxbill; Orange- breasted Waxbill, -
Survey of Western Tragopan, Koklass Pheasant, and Himalayan Monal Populations in the John Corder, World Pheasant Association
60 Indian BIRDS Vol. 6 No. 3 (Publ. 7th August 2010) Survey of Western Tragopan, Koklass Pheasant, and Himalayan Monal populations in the Pheasant Association. World John Corder, Great Himalayan National Park, Himachal Pradesh, India Fig. 1. Himalayan Monal Lophophorus Jennifer R. B. Miller impejanus. Miller, J. R. B. 2010. Survey of Western Tragopan, Koklass Pheasant, and Himalayan Monal populations in the Great Himalayan National Park, Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian BIRDS 6 (3): XXX–XXX. Jennifer R. B. Miller1, Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, 195 Prospect Street, New Haven Connecticut 06511, USA. Email: [email protected] Surveys conducted in the late 1990’s indicated that pheasant populations in the Great Himalayan National Park, Himachal Pradesh, India were declining. In 1999, the government legally notified the park and authorities began enforcing the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, banning biomass extraction within park boundaries and reducing human disturbance. Populations of three pheasant species (Western Tragopan, Koklass Pheasant and Himalayan Monal) were subsequently surveyed in the park during the breeding season (April–May) in 2008. Call counts and line transects were used to assess current abundances and gather more information on the characteristics of these species in the wild. Relative abundances of all three species were significantly higher than in previous surveys. Tragopan males began their breeding calls in late April and continued through May whereas Koklass males called consistently throughout the study period. The daily peak calling periods of the two species overlapped, but Tragopan males began calling earlier in the morning than Koklass males. Monals were most often sighted alone or in pairs and larger groups tended to have equal sex composition or a slightly higher number of females than males. -
Application to Keep Restricted Birds Permit Covers the Keeping of Restricted Avian Fauna at the Address Stated on the Authority
Department of Restricted birds application Agriculture and Food Application to keep restricted birds Permit covers the keeping of restricted avian fauna at the address stated on the authority. Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007 and Regulations 2013 Completed forms should be returned to: Further information on the permit requirements is Department of Environment and Conservation available from DEC Wildlife Licensing Section Western Australia Phone: +61 (08) 9219 9835 Locked Bag 30 Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 Email: [email protected] Or faxed to +61 (08) 9219 8242 Restricted bird permits are issued for a 1-year period, with fees payable as below. Please allow five (5) working days to process, complete and correct applications. Applicant Title: Given name(s): Surname: Street address (residential): Suburb: State/Territory: Postcode: Street address (postal): Suburb: State/Territory: Postcode: Street address (aviary): Suburb: State/Territory: Postcode: Phone: Mobile: Email: Fax: Date of birth: Date of application: Signature: Restricted birds application Page 1 of 3 current as at 1st May 2013 Restricted birds application Applicant is required to provide: 1. Proof of identity and age (driver’s licence, passport, or other appropriate document). 2. Details of any relevant convictions in Australia in the past five years. Relevant conviction means a wildlife related offence. Fees and payment Money order/cheques made payable to ‘Department of Environment and Conservation Western Australia’ to be attached to completed application form OR complete credit card details below. Please do not send cash via post. Licence type (tick one only) Category of permit being sought (tick only one): Restricted keeping permit (1 year) No Fee Please view page 3 to see which birds incur a $30 fee and which birds are Restricted keeping permit (1 year) Fee $30.00 permitted free of charge. -
Evaluation of Mortality Rate of Three Captive Pheasant Species at Dhodial Pheasantry, Mansehra, Pakistan
Podoces, 2017, 12(2): 43–46 PODOCES 2017 Vol. 12, No. 2 Journal homepage: www.wesca.net Evaluation of Mortality Rate of Three Captive Pheasant Species at Dhodial Pheasantry, Mansehra, Pakistan Alia Saeed1, Atta Ur Rehman1, Shabir Ahmed1, Muhammad Awais2, Tariq Mahmood2, Fazli Subhan3 & Sajid Mahmood*1 1) Department of Zoology, Hazara University, Mansehra-21300, KP, Pakistan 2) Department of Wildlife Management, PMAS-UAAR-46300, Punjab, Pakistan 3) Department of Microbiology, Hazara University, Mansehra-21300, KP, Pakistan Article info Abstract Original research The present study was aimed to evaluate the mortality rate of three Received: 8 October 2016 captive pheasant species, viz. Himalayan Monal Lophophorus impejanus, Accepted: 27 February 2018 Cheer Pheasant Catreus wallichii and Kalij Pheasant Lophura leucomelanos at Dhodial Pheasantry, Mansehra, Pakistan. Four years Key words (2011–2014) retrospective data about mortality and survival rates of these Catreus wallichii three pheasant species were obtained from the Dhodial Pheasantry and Lophophorus impejanus were statistically analyzed. The overall mortality rate of the adult Lophura leucomelanos Himalayan Monal, Kalij and Cheer Pheasants were found to be 75.6%, Mortality 62.6% and 37.4%, respectively. The results showed statistically Pakistan significant difference in mortality rates (P<0.01) of these three captive Pheasantry pheasant species (P<0.05). The year-wise mortality rates of the Himalayan Monal and Kalij Pheasant showed significantly higher difference (P<0.05), however, the mortality rate of the Cheer Pheasant remained consistent across the four years of the study period. 1. Introduction (Howman 1993; IUCN 2006). The life history Pheasants belong to the order Galliformes of pheasants is characterized by a short lifespan (Delacour 1977). -
Phasianinae Species Tree
Phasianinae Blood Pheasant,Ithaginis cruentus Ithaginini ?Western Tragopan, Tragopan melanocephalus Satyr Tragopan, Tragopan satyra Blyth’s Tragopan, Tragopan blythii Temminck’s Tragopan, Tragopan temminckii Cabot’s Tragopan, Tragopan caboti Lophophorini ?Snow Partridge, Lerwa lerwa Verreaux’s Monal-Partridge, Tetraophasis obscurus Szechenyi’s Monal-Partridge, Tetraophasis szechenyii Chinese Monal, Lophophorus lhuysii Himalayan Monal, Lophophorus impejanus Sclater’s Monal, Lophophorus sclateri Koklass Pheasant, Pucrasia macrolopha Wild Turkey, Meleagris gallopavo Ocellated Turkey, Meleagris ocellata Tetraonini Ruffed Grouse, Bonasa umbellus Hazel Grouse, Tetrastes bonasia Chinese Grouse, Tetrastes sewerzowi Greater Sage-Grouse / Sage Grouse, Centrocercus urophasianus Gunnison Sage-Grouse / Gunnison Grouse, Centrocercus minimus Dusky Grouse, Dendragapus obscurus Sooty Grouse, Dendragapus fuliginosus Sharp-tailed Grouse, Tympanuchus phasianellus Greater Prairie-Chicken, Tympanuchus cupido Lesser Prairie-Chicken, Tympanuchus pallidicinctus White-tailed Ptarmigan, Lagopus leucura Rock Ptarmigan, Lagopus muta Willow Ptarmigan / Red Grouse, Lagopus lagopus Siberian Grouse, Falcipennis falcipennis Spruce Grouse, Canachites canadensis Western Capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus Black-billed Capercaillie, Tetrao parvirostris Black Grouse, Lyrurus tetrix Caucasian Grouse, Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi Tibetan Partridge, Perdix hodgsoniae Gray Partridge, Perdix perdix Daurian Partridge, Perdix dauurica Reeves’s Pheasant, Syrmaticus reevesii Copper Pheasant, Syrmaticus -
Distribution and Population Status of Himalayan Monal Pheasant (Lophophorusimpejanus) in Salkhala Game Reserve, Neelum Valley Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Pakistan)
Ahmad et al., The J. Anim. Plant Sci. 29(4):2019 DISTRIBUTION AND POPULATION STATUS OF HIMALAYAN MONAL PHEASANT (LOPHOPHORUSIMPEJANUS) IN SALKHALA GAME RESERVE, NEELUM VALLEY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR (PAKISTAN) B. Ahmad1*, F. Noor1, M. S. Awan1, R. A. Minhas1 and U. Ali2 1Department of Zoology, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Muzaffarabad, AJ&K, Pakistan; 2Department of Zoology, Mirpur University of Science and Technology, Mirpur (10250), AJ&K, Pakistan *Corresponding Author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Present study was carried out to determine distribution and population status of Himalayan Monal pheasant (Lophophorus impejanus) in Salkhala Game Reserve. This game reserve is an Endemic Bird Area in the Neelum valley within Western Himalayas, situated along ceasefire line between Pakistan and India. For data collection, study area was divided into three localities with eleven sub-localities. Systematic surveys were conducted in each sub-locality from March to September 2014, early in the morning (5:00-9:00am) and half an hour before evening. Distribution was determined by direct and indirect evidences including sighting, ground scratching, feathers, fecal material, foot prints, information collected from hunters, locals and wildlife staff. Populationof the bird was estimated by line transect method, laid down in the habitat of Himalayan Monal. The results indicated that this pheasant is distributed in all localities of the study area, preferring high altitude mountains with different aspects and slopes between 1900 mand 2600 m above sea level (asl). Overall population density of Himalayan Monal in the study area was 5.63 birds/km2. The highest density (6.81 birds/km2) was recorded in locality Khikhre-dohre, followed by locality Tehar-chhamman (5.33 birds/km2) and Chitta-pani (4.76 birds/km2). -
Himalayan Monal
HIMALAYAN MONAL Galliformes Family: Phasianidae Genus: Lophophorus Species: impejanus Range: Himalayas from eastern Afghanistan to Bhutan, northeast India and southern Tibet; also in Burma. Habitat: Open coniferous or mixed forests with bamboo; elevated forests, cliffs and meadows between 7900 - 14800 feet. Niche: omnivorous, terrestrial, diurnal Wild diet: Seeds, tubers, shoots, berries and Insects Zoo diet: Life Span: (Wild) (Captivity) 10-12 years Sexual dimorphism: sexually dichromatic Location in SF Zoo: Short bird string APPEARANCE & PHYSICAL ADAPTATIONS: The Himalayan Monal is a relatively large-sized, pheasant. The adult male possesses a wiry, metallic green head-crest with spoon-shaped feathers. The eyes are ringed with blue, and the neck is reddish-brown. At the nape of the neck is a yellow patch that forms the top edge of the bluish- black wings and the purplish-black back. The breast is dark brown and the tail feathers are chestnut brown with a white rump that is visible in flight and when displaying to the females. The female has dark brown feathers except for a white throat Weight: 3 - 5 lbs and rump patch and the bright blue circle around the eyes. The female Length: 2 - 2 1/2 feet also has a crest, but it is shorter and brown with ordinary feathers. Wingspan: This species has strong legs and a long, curved beak that together enable it to dig into the hard soil of the mountains to uncover food. This method of foraging leaves conspicuous areas of turned over soil up to 10 inches deep on hillsides. STATUS & CONSERVATION Classified as Least Concern (LC) on the IUCN Red List and listed on Appendix I of CITES. -
Galliformes of Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve, Sikkim, India
GALLIFORMES OF KHANGCHENDZONGA BIOSPHERE RESERVE, SIKKIM, INDIA S. Sathyakumar, K. Poudyal, T. Bhattacharya and T. Bashir ABSTRACT e assessed the distribution and relative abundance of galliformes in Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve (BR), from February 2008 to April 2010. We sampled Prek Chu catchment (182 Km2) by using trail Wsampling (n=22) and camera trapping (n=27). Only trail sampling was used to survey the other watersheds of the BR. Through visual encounters and camera trap photos, we confirmed the presence of Blood pheasant (Ithaganis creuntus), Himalayan monal (Lophophorus impejanus), Satyr tragopan (Tragopan satyra), Snow partridge (Lerwa lerwa), Hill partridge (Arborophila torqueola) and Kalij pheasant (Lophura leucomelanos). Presence of Tibetan snowcock (Tetraogallus tibetanus) was confirmed through calls, droppings and marks at Lhonak valley, the northern trans –Himalayan part of BR. Snow partridge, Blood pheasant and Himalayan monal evidences were encountered in the subalpine and alpine habitats, whereas Satyr tragopan evidences were encountered in subalpine and temperate forests. Visual encounters of Kalij pheasant and Hill partridge were restricted to temperate zone only. Poaching and habitat degradation are threats to the galliformes species and their habitats. KEYWORDS: Galliformes, Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve, Habitat degradation The gregarious and well camouflaged Snow Partridges in the alpine rock and meadow habitats of Khangchendzonga National Park 301 The beautiful Blood Pheasant also the 'State Bird of Sikkim' -
Breeding and Managing Pheasants
Chapter 5 Keeping chicks alive – parent or broody reared At times, it can seem that pheasant chicks find every possible way to kill themselves or to get themselves killed. They seem to escape from the aviary through the smallest of holes, stand next to the wire dividing aviaries and get pecked by neighbouring adults or just stand out in the rain and get too wet to survive. Parent-reared chicks seem to have fewer problems but can still wander off from their mother and chill quickly. Predicting where and when problems can occur can frequently make the difference between keeping the chicks alive and losing them. The parent or broody hen provides warmth and shelter. Chicks and parents need to learn this, so limit the brooding range initially and ensure that they will not get wet if it rains. Ensure there are no obstacles where chicks can get lost – the parent can fly, but the chick can’t. Pheasants can’t count, so can easily lose chicks – however, they usually respond very rapidly to alarm calls from their chicks. Place food and water in easily accessible areas. Supply food in a shallow container where the chicks can feed easily, but remember that the parents of some species will also use this as a food source, so check that food is always available Acquire mealworms and chick crumbs before the predicted hatch date – hard boiled egg can also be very palatable and good for young chicks Provide clean water in a container that is accessible to chicks, but where they won’t get wet – pebbles make good stepping stones. -
Distribution and Abundance of Galliformes in Response to Anthropogenic Pressures in the Buffer Zone of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve
Distribution and abundance of Galliformes in response to anthropogenic pressures in the buffer zone of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve TAPAJIT BHATTACHARYA , S. SATHYAKUMAR * and G.S. RAWAT Wildlife Institute of India, P.O. Box 18, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248001, Uttaranchal, India. *Correspondence author - [email protected] Paper presented at the 4 th International Galliformes Symposium, 2007, Chengdu, China. Abstract Prior to this study, information on the status of Galliformes and habitat availability in the buffer zones of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (NDBR) was lacking. An assessment of distribution patterns and abundance of Galliformes in response to anthropogenic pressures was carried out during 2005 – 2006 by surveying transects and point call count locations. A variety of measures were taken to estimate anthropogenic pressure. Himalayan monal was the most encountered pheasant (n = 299), then koklass (n = 53). Abundance estimates of monal and koklass were highest during spring and lowest during summer when anthropogenic activities were highest. Density of monal varied due to disturbance and season whereas koklass varied with season but not disturbance. Himalayan monal and koklass use habitats with herded livestock during spring and autumn, and grass cover and livestock presence were negatively related to pheasant occurrence during spring and autumn. Uncontrolled medicinal plant extraction, human disturbance, livestock and associated shepherd dogs are thought to all have an adverse impact on Galliformes and their habitats. Keywords Abundance, distribution, Galliformes, habitat sharing, livestock grazing Introduction natural resources. To understand the effect of anthropogenic pressures on pheasants and their Pheasants in the Himalaya are the most habitats, a study was carried out with two charismatic and conspicuous fauna of the objectives: an estimation of Galliformes region.