DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Hollister

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Hollister CITY OF HOLLISTER R OSATI A NNEXATION P ROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared for: CITY OF HOLLISTER 339 FIFTH STREET HOLLISTER, CA 95023 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 500 YGNACIO VALLEY ROAD, SUITE 300 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 MAY 2019 CITY OF HOLLISTER R OSATI A NNEXATION P ROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared for: CITY OF HOLLISTER 339 FIFTH STREET HOLLISTER, CA 95023 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 500 YGNACIO VALLEY ROAD, SUITE 300 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 MAY 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction and Regulatory Guidance .................................................................................. 1.0-1 1.2 Lead Agency ................................................................................................................................. 1.0-1 1.3 Purpose and Document Organization ..................................................................................... 1.0-1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................ 2.0-1 2.2 Background and Existing Setting ............................................................................................... 2.0-1 2.3 Proposed Project .......................................................................................................................... 2.0-1 2.4 Project Approvals ......................................................................................................................... 2.0-2 3.0 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST A. Background ................................................................................................................................... 3.0-1 B. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ............................................................................ 3.0-2 C. Determination ............................................................................................................................... 3.0-2 D. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ....................................................................................... 3.0-3 1. Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................ 3.0-4 2. Agriculture and Forestry Resources .................................................................................... 3.0-7 3. Air Quality .............................................................................................................................. 3.0-13 4. Biological Resources. ........................................................................................................... 3.0-23 5. Cultural Resources. .............................................................................................................. 3.0-34 6. Energy. ................................................................................................................................... 3.0-38 7. Geology and Soils. ............................................................................................................... 3.0-42 8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................................. 3.0-47 9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................................... 3.0-60 10. Hydrology and Water Quality ........................................................................................... 3.0-66 11. Land Use and Planning ....................................................................................................... 3.0-77 12. Mineral Resources. ............................................................................................................... 3.0-79 13. Noise ....................................................................................................................................... 3.0-80 14. Population and Housing ..................................................................................................... 3.0-88 15. Public Services ...................................................................................................................... 3.0-90 16. Recreation ............................................................................................................................. 3.0-94 17. Transportation ....................................................................................................................... 3.0-95 18. Tribal Cultural Resources ................................................................................................... 3.0-104 19. Utilities and Service Systems ............................................................................................. 3.0-106 20. Wildfire ................................................................................................................................. 3.0-111 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance .............................................................................. 3.0-113 4.0 LIST OF MITIGATION MEASURES 5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS 6.0 REFERENCES City of Hollister Rosati Annexation Project May 2019 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration i TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDICES Appendix AIR/GHG – Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Appendix BIO – Biological Resources Appendix CUL – Cultural Resources Study Appendix GEO –Geotechnical Engineering Study Appendix HAZ – Modified Phase I Environmental Site Report Appendix TIA – Traffic Impact Analysis LIST OF TABLES Table 3.3-1 Short-Term Construction Emissions ............................................................................. 3.0-17 Table 3.3-2 Long-Term Operational Emissions .............................................................................. 3.0-19 Table 3.6-1 Energy Consumption .................................................................................................... 3.0-39 Table 3.7-1 Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions ....................................................................... 3.0-52 Table 3.7-2 Consistency with the Climate Change Scoping Plan ........................................... 3.0-54 Table 3.12-1 Noise and Land Use Compatibility ............................................................................ 3.0-81 Table 3.12-2 Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment ........................ 3.0-84 Table 3.17-1 ITE Rates and Trip Generation .................................................................................... 3.0-98 Table 3.17-2 Proposed Project Trip Generation ............................................................................. 3.0-98 Table 3.17-3 Existing plus Project Conditions AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS .................. 3.0-99 Table 3.17-4 Background plus Project Conditions AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS ...... 3.0-100 Table 3.17-5 Cumulative Conditions plus Project AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS ........ 3.0-101 Table 3.19-1 John Smith Landfill Disposal Capacity .................................................................... 3.0-108 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.0-1 Regional Location ........................................................................................................... 2.0-3 Figure 2.0-2 Project Location .............................................................................................................. 2.0-5 Figure 3.2-1 Designated Farmland .................................................................................................. 3.0-11 Figure 3.10-1 FEMA Map ...................................................................................................................... 3.0-69 Rosati Annexation Project City of Hollister Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2019 ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION AND REGULATORY GUIDANCE An initial study is conducted by a lead agency to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment (CEQA Guidelines Section 15063[a]). If there is substantial evidence that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report (EIR) must be prepared, in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15064(a). However, if the lead agency determines the impacts are, or can be reduced to, less than significant, a negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration may be prepared instead of an EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15070[b]). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15070, a mitigated negative declaration is appropriate when the project’s initial study identifies potentially significant effects, but: a. Revisions to the project plan were made that would avoid or reduce the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and b. There is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. This Initial Study identifies potentially significant impacts on certain environmental resources. The Mitigated Negative Declaration proposes a range of mitigation measures to reduce all such effects to less than significant levels. Therefore, the City of Hollister (City) has prepared this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the project because all impacts resulting from the project are reduced to less than significant levels through the adoption and implementation of mitigation measures incorporated into the project. This IS/MND conforms
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Hollister San Benito River Greenway
    INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF HOLLISTER SAN BENITO RIVER GREENWAY DECEMBER 2008 Lead Agency: City of Hollister Engineering Department 375 Fifth Street Hollister, CA 95024 Prepared By: Analytical Environmental Services 1801 7th Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, Ca 95811 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF HOLLISTER SAN BENITO RIVER GREENWAY DECEMBER 2008 Lead Agency: City of Hollister Engineering Department 375 Fifth Street Hollister, CA 95024 Prepared By: Analytical Environmental Services 1801 7th Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, Ca 95811 TABLE OF CONTENTS SAN BENITO RIVER GREENWAY PROJECT INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Study ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ....................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Evaluation Terminology ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 Organization of the Initial Study ......................................................................................... 1-2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Natural Resources
    CHAPTER 8. NATURAL RESOURCES San Benito County General Plan Chapter 8 Natural Resources This chapter describes the location and extent of existing natural resources within San Benito County, including water resources, mineral and energy resources, biological resources, and oil and gas resources. This chapter is organized into the following sections: . Water Resources (Section 8.1) . Energy and Mineral Resources (Section 8.2) . Biological Resources (Section 8.3) . Oil and Gas Resources (Section 8.4) Public Draft Background Report Page 8-1 November 2010 CHAPTER 8. NATURAL RESOURCES San Benito County General Plan This page is intentionally left blank. Page 8-2 Public Review Draft Background Report November 2010 CHAPTER 8. NATURAL RESOURCES San Benito County General Plan SECTION 8.1 WATER RESOURCES Introduction This section summarizes and analyzes information about the availability and quality of water resources in San Benito County. It includes information about historical and current conditions and projections for future ground water, surface water, and imported water resource conditions, where available. Analyzing existing water resource conditions and water supply data provides important information about the ability of the County to provide and manage water supplies that meet both existing and projected future growth. Key Terms Acre-foot (AF). The volume of water required to cover one acre of land (43,560 square feet) to a depth of one foot. One acre-foot is equal to 325,851 gallons or 1,233 cubic meters. Historically, an acre-foot represents the amount of water typically used by one family during a year. Aquifer. A geological formation or structure that stores and/or transmits water, such as wells and springs.
    [Show full text]
  • San Juan Bautista Plaza
    MISSION SAN JUAN BAUTISTA HALS CA-84 (San Juan Bautista Plaza) HALS CA-84 Roughly bounded by Second Street, driveway and unpaved road in line with Polk Street, San Juan Creek, and Franklin Street San Juan Bautista San Benito County California WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY MISSION SAN JUAN BAUTISTA (San Juan Bautista Plaza) HALS NO. CA-84 Location: Roughly bounded by Second Street, driveway and unpaved road in line with Polk Street, San Juan Creek, and Franklin Street San Juan Bautista, San Benito County, California San Juan Bautista Plaza National Historic Landmark District San Juan Bautista State Historic Park Lat: 36.84521 Long: -122.53556 (Plaza Center, Garmin GPS unit, accuracy 10′, WGS84) Significance: Franciscan missionaries founded twenty-one missions on the Pacific coast of the Spanish colony of Alta California between 1769 and 1823. Control of Alta California shifted to Mexico in the 1820s and to America in the 1840s. Some of the communities that grew around the missions became major cities; some missions were abandoned and later reconstructed. Portions of El Camino Real, the road connecting the missions, became interstate or state highways. Mission San Juan Bautista was the fifteenth mission to be established, in 1797. Despite repeated damage from earthquakes on the adjacent San Andreas Fault, Mission San Juan Bautista was never moved from its original location and has been in continuous use as a church since its establishment. Its environs are still largely agricultural, its plaza has been restored to the spirit of its 1870 state, and its adjacent portion of El Camino Real is still unpaved.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trip to the Calaveras and San Andreas Faults: Hollister and San Juan Bautista Region
    Field Trip to the Calaveras and San Andreas Faults: Hollister and San Juan Bautista Region This field trip provides access to well known fault investigation sites in the southern Santa Clara Valley region. Field trips stops include fault scarps and offset manmade and natural landmarks along the Calaveras and San Andreas faults, sag ponds, and bedrock exposures in the Salinian basement complex west of the San Andreas Fault. The field trip begins at the Hollister exit on Highway 101 on Highway 25. Drivers, please note that the highways are busy along these routes; drive cautiously and defensively! Stops 1 to 4 are modified from Harden, D., Stenner, H. M., and Blatz, I., (2001). Stop 5 is a visit to the San Andreas Fault at Mission San Juan Bautista. Stops 6 and 7 involve driving up to Fremont Peak State Park (where camping is available in season). Stops A to C include an optional extension of the field trip to stops along the San Andreas Fault east off Highway 101 along Anzar Road, at a quarry in Aromas, and to the fault at Pajaro Gap. A very useful resource for this field trip is the Geologic map of the Monterey 30'x60' Quadrangle and adjacent areas, California by Wagner and others (2002). It is available from the California Geological Survey. Figure 2-1. Field trip stops include two along the trace of the Calaveras Fault in Hollister (1 and 2), stops along the San Andreas Fault at the Hollister Hill State Vehicular Recreation Area (3), the Cienega Valley (4), the mission at San Juan Bautista (5), and overlook areas along San Juan Canyon Road [G1] (6), and Fremont Peak State Park (7).
    [Show full text]
  • Dole Spinach E Coli Outbreak
    Investigation of an Escherichia coli 0157:H7 Outbreak Associated with Dole Pre-Packaged Spinach Attachment 11 CDC Addendum Report, "Irrigation Water Issues Potentially Related to 2006 E. coli 0157:H7 in Spinach Outbreak" Irrigation Water Issues Potentially Related to 2006 E. coli 0157:H7 in Spinach Outbreak CDR Rick Gelting, PhD, PE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Environmental Health/Environmental Health Services Branch (770) 488-7067 [email protected] Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Surface mnoff from grazing areas onto cultivated fields ........................................................ 3 Construction of irrigation wells .............................................................................................. 3 Depths to groundwater and groundwater/surface water interactions ...................................... 4 Direct use of untreated surface water for irrigation ................................................................ 6 Paicines Ranch: intensive sampling and investigation of potential water issues .................... 6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 9 Public health recommendations ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Benito Mountain Research Natural Area Management Plan
    Clear Creek Management Area Appendix III Proposed RMP and Final EIS – Volume II Appendix III - San Benito Mountain Research Natural Area Management Plan The San Benito Mountain Research Natural Area (SBMRNA), located within the Clear Creek Management Area (CCMA), was designated by the BLM in 1999 to encourage research and provide protection of the unique conifer forest and vegetation communities on and around San Benito Mountain (BLM 1999). The boundaries of the existing SBMRNA were subsequently expanded as identified in the Clear Creek Management Area Resource Management Plan Amendment and Route Designation Record of Decision (BLM 2006). This Research Natural Area Management Plan guides management of the SBMRNA and identifies management goals and objectives that will permit natural processes to continue without interference. 1.1 Introduction The Bureau of Land Management establishes and maintains Research Natural Areas (RNAs) for the primary purpose of research and education. RNAs have one or more of the following characteristics (43 CFR 8223 – Research Natural Areas): A typical representation of a common plant or animal association; An unusual representation of a common plant or animal association; A threatened or endangered plant or animal species; A typical representation of common geologic, soil, or water features; Outstanding or unusual geologic, soil, or water features. Dr. James R. Griffin made the original recommendation to establish the San Benito Mountain Natural Area in 1970, declaring that “…it would in no way duplicate any North Coast Range serpentine natural area and would be a highly desirable contrast with them.” The San Benito Mountain Research Natural Area (SBMRNA) has outstanding features including geology, soils, ecology, and threatened plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Final 2040 San Benito Regional Transportation Plan and Its Final Environmental Impact Report
    SAN BENITO REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN RTP 2018-2040 COUNCIL OF SAN BENITO COUNTY GOVERNMENTS (COG) Final: June 21, 2018 Mission Statement Acknowledgements BOARD OF DIRECTORS COG AGENCY STAFF Jaime De La Cruz, Chair Mary Gilbert The Council of San Benito County San Benito County Board of Supervisors Executive Director Governments improves the mobility of San Ignacio Velazquez, Vice Chair Veronica Lezama Benito County travelers by planning for and Hollister City Council Transportation Planner investing in a multi‐modal transportation Jim Gillio RTP Project Manager Hollister City Council Regina Valentine system that is safe, economically viable, and Tony Boch Transportation Planner environmentally friendly. San Juan Bautista City Council Kathy Postigo Anthony Botelho Administrative Services Specialist San Benito County Board of Supervisors Monica Gomez Council of County Governments (COG) Secretary Airport Land Use Commission Griselda Arevalo (ALUC) Office Assistant Local Transportation Authority (LTA) Chris Thomson Service Authority for Freeways and Mechanic Expressways (SAFE) Measure A Authority EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCING ON THE MOVE: 2040 1‐0 SAN BENITO COUNTY SETTING 1‐1 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY 1‐1 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 1‐3 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN STRUCTURE 1‐4 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING IN SAN BENITO COUNTY 1‐7 CHAPTER 2 OVERALL POLICY APPROACH, FRAMEWORK AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2‐0 OVERALL POLICY APPROACH 2‐1 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION GOALS 2‐2 PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2‐8 STATE PLANNING GOALS
    [Show full text]
  • Msr, 3.2.15) (3 10 2015
    13.0 HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES This chapter provides an evaluation of the potential hydrology and water resource effects of implementing the proposed 2035 San Benito County General Plan (2035 General Plan). As established in the Notice of Preparation (see Appendix A, Notice of Preparation), urban development and other activities resulting from implementation of the 2035 General Plan may result in degradation of hydrology and water resources. The following environmental assessment includes a review of hydrology and water resources potentially affected by the implementation of the 2035 General Plan, including the availability and quality of water resources and the potential for flooding. Potential effects to water supplies and stormwater conveyance facilities arising from implementation of the 2035 General Plan are evaluated separately in Chapter 20, Utilities and Service Systems, of this RDEIR. This review addresses applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and programs that relate to surface- and groundwater quality, resource management and protection, and floodplain management and protection. The existing condition of San Benito County (County) water resources was determined through, among other things, a review of local groundwater resource reports, including the Annual Groundwater Reports of the San Benito County Water District (SBCWD) (SBCWD 2006-2014) and recent water resource management plans, including the Hollister Urban Area Water and Wastewater Master Plan (City of Hollister 2008) and the Hollister Urban Area Urban Water Management Plan (City of Hollister 2011). Flood conditions were assessed via Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulatory maps and information, as well as maps produced by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). Potential impacts related to water resources were analyzed based on CEQA assessment criteria and guidelines provided by the County.
    [Show full text]
  • Benitoite from the New Idria District, San Benito
    BENITOITE FROM THE NEW IDRIA DISTRICT,SAN BENITO COUNTY,CALIFORNIA By Brendan M. Laurs, William R. Rohtert, and Michael Gray em-quality benitoite has been mined intermittent- Commercial quantities of gem-quality beni- toite are known from a single location in the ly from only one region in the world, the New Idria world, the Benitoite Gem mine in the New G district of San Benito County, California. Benitoite Idria district of San Benito County, Californ- was first discovered there in 1907; it was named after the ia. A barium titanium silicate, benitoite is county, as well as the San Benito River, which runs through typically colorless to blue, and is noteworthy the property, and the nearby San Benito Mountain for its high refractive indices, moderate bire- (Louderback, 1909). Stones are strongly dichroic, typically fringence, and strong dispersion. Benitoite violetish blue and colorless. Exceptionally rare gemstones occurs in altered blueschist within serpenti- are colorless and pink. A few orange benitoites have been nite. The gem crystals formed within frac- produced by heat treatment of colorless material. Benitoite tures as a result of the alteration of blueschist has high refractive indices, moderate birefringence, and by hydrothermal fluids derived from the strong dispersion (exceeding that of diamond in some direc- regional metamorphism of the serpentinite. An extension of the historic deposit at the tions), which render the faceted gems comparable in appear- Benitoite Gem mine was discovered in the ance and price to fine sapphire and tanzanite (figure 1). spring of 1997, which should contribute to Although production has been sporadic throughout the life continued stability in price and supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G. Environmental Review Checklist
    Appendix G. Environmental Review Checklist G-1 SAN BENITO COUNTY BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN This Page Intentionally Left Blank G-2 APPENDIX G: CEQA CHECKLIST NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPROVE A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE and NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC REVIEW DATE September 16, 2009 LEAD AGENCY: Council of San Benito County Governments 330 Tres Pinos Road, Suite C-7 Hollister, CA 95023 PROJECT TITLE: San Benito Bikeways and Pedestrian Master Plan PROJECT LOCATION: Various locations throughout San Benito County PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The San Benito Bikeways and Pedestrian Master Plan is part of San Benito’s vision for a more livable and healthy city. The Plan is designed to improve accessibility and mobility throughout the County for bicyclists and pedestrians. By improving transportation for bicyclists and pedestrians, the Council of Governments hopes to enhance the quality of neighborhoods and commercial districts, better the health of its residents, reduce automobile use and thereby improve air quality, and provide access for people who do not use automobiles for transportation. The Plans describes a bicycle network and pedestrian improvements and bicycle and pedestrian programs. The Plan is a general description of proposed countywide improvements. Individual projects will be fully evaluated and designed as opportunities arise, funding is made available, and citywide priorities are established. The Plan describes: (1) An interconnected bikeway network that includes a mix of dedicated bicycle paths, bike lanes, and shared- use bicycle routes. The proposed bikeways were selected based upon several criteria, including: a. Public input b. Connections to schools c. Connections to major employment centers d.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Resources and Constraints Inventory
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND CONSTRAINTS INVENTORY Adopted by the San Benito County Board of Supervisors July 26, 1994 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND CONSTRAINTS INVENTORY SAN BENITO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mike Graves, Chair, District 5 Richard Scagliotti, District 1 Ruth Kesler, District 2 Rita Bowling, District 3 Curtis Graves, District 4 Adopted by San Benito County Board of Supervisors on July 26, 1994 by Resolution 94- 89 SAN BENITO COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Jack Kent, Chairman Murrill Conley Bob Cruz Pat Loe John Shelton Approved by San Benito County Planning Commission on June 15, 1994 by Resolution 94-12 SAN BENITO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF Rob Mendiola, Director of Planning Mary Paxton, Advanced Planning 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Environmental Resources and Constraints Inventory Background ...............................................................................................................1 Category 1 - Existing Public and Private Open Space ..............................................1 Category 2 - Noise ...................................................................................................12 Category 3 - Soils ..................................................................................................12 Category 4 - Unstable Soils/Fault Hazards ........................................................... 17 Category 5 Fire Hazards ........................................................................................27 Category 6 Water Resources ..................................................................................32
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
    Jump to Navigation Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States As of January 12, 2017, the USGS maintains a limited number of metadata fields that characterize the Quaternary faults and folds of the United States. For the most up-to-date information, please refer to the interactive fault map. Calaveras fault zone, Paicines section (Class A) No. 54d Last Review Date: 1999-03-04 Compiled in cooperation with the California Geological Survey citation for this record: Bryant, W.A., and Cluett, S.E., compilers, 1999, Fault number 54d, Calaveras fault zone, Paicines section, in Quaternary fault and fold database of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey website, https://earthquakes.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults, accessed 12/14/2020 03:06 PM. Synopsis General: Historically active major dextral strike-slip fault that is part of the larger San Andreas fault system. The fault zone extends for about 150 km from the San Ramon area southeast to about 30 km south of Hollister. The fault has a complex linkage to the San Andreas fault zone [1] along the subparallel Paicines fault, herein considered to be the southernmost part of the Calaveras fault zone. In general, the Calaveras fault zone is expressed as numerous strands that form a zone tens of meters to more than 500 m in width (1982 #5521). Locally the Paicines fault is expressed as a zone as much as 2 km wide. Various fault is expressed as a zone as much as 2 km wide. Various segmentation models have been proposed by Simpson and others (1992 #5527), Taylor (1992 #5531), Petersen and others (1996 #4860), Working Group on Northern California Earthquake Potential (1996 #1216), and Kelson and others (1998 #5518).
    [Show full text]