DOCSLIB.ORG

Ectomycorrhizal Species Registered in Douglas Fir Native Forests

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ectomycorrhizal Species Registered in Douglas Fir Native Forests VI Appendix 1: Ectomycorrhizal species registered in Douglas fir native forests. Species references comments Alpova diplophloeus (Zeller & Dodge) (8) Trappe & Smith Alpova trappei Fogel (6) (9) Amanita aprica Tulloss & Lindgren nom (10) not included prov. Amanita aspera (Fr.) Hooker (1) (9) Amanita chlorinosma (Peck) Lloyd (1) Amanita franchetii (Boud.) Fayod (10) Amanita gemmata (Fr.) Bertillon (1) (10) Amanita muscaria (L.) Hook. (1) (9) Amanita pachycolea D.E. Stuntz (10) Amanita pantherina Gonn. & Rabenh. (1) (9) (10) Amanita porphyria Fr. (9) Amanita silvicola Kauffman (1) (9) (10) Amanita smithiana Bas. (10) Amanita strobiliformis (Paulet ex Vittad.) (1) Bertill. Amanita vaginata (Bull.) Vittad. (1) (10) Amanita sp. (10) parasitized by sapedonium Balsamia magnata Harkn. (9) Balsamia nigrens Harkn. (2) Barssia oregonensis Gilkey (2) (4) (9) Boletellus zelleri (Murrill) Singer, Snell & (1) E.A. Dick Boletinus amabilis (Peck) Snell (1) Boletus chrysenteron gr. Bull. (9) (3) Boletus edulis Bull. (1) Boletus erythropus Krombh. (1) Boletus luridiformis Rostk. (10) Boletus mirabilis Murrill. (9) Boletus piperatus Bull. (9) Boletus subtomentosus Fr. (9) Boletus zelleri Murr. (9) Camarophyllus borealis (Peck) Murrill (9) Cantharellus cibarius Fr. (1) (7) Cantharellus floccosus Schw. (1) Cantharellus formosus Corner (9) (10) Cantharellus subalbidus A.H. Sm. & Morse (1) (9) (10) Cantharellus cf. sp. nov. Cenococcum graniforme (Sowerby) Ferd. & (1) Winge Chalciporus piperatoides (A.H. Sm. & (10) Thiers) T.J. Baroni & Both Chroogomphus tomentosus (Murrill) O.K. (9) Mill. Clavariadelphus ligula (Schaeff.) Donk (9) Clavariadelphus mucronatus V.L. Wells & (9) Kempton Clavulina sp (9) Cortinarius subg. Bulbopodium (9) 4 species Cortinarius subg. Cortinarius (9) 1 species C. limonius (Fr.) Fr. (10) VII C. violaceus (L.) Gray (10) Cortinarius subg. Dermocybe (9) 5 species C. californicus A.H. Sm. (10) C. cascadensis Ammirat. & A.H. Sm (10) C. cinnamomeus (L.) Fr. (1) (10) C. croceus (Schaeff.) Gray (10) C. malicorius Fr. (10) C. phoeniceus var. occidentalis A.H. Sm. (10) C. sanguineus (Wulf ) Fr. (10) C. semisanguineus (Fr.) Guillet (10) C. thiersii Ammirati & A.H. Sm (10) C. zakii Ammirati& A.H. Sm. (10) (3) Cortinarius subg. Leprocybe (9) 9 species C. clandestinus Kauffman (10) C. cotoneus Fr. (10) C. gentilis (Fr.) Fr. (10) C. cf. rubicundulus (Rea) A. Pearson (10) Cortinarius subg. Myxacium (9) 4 species C. delibutus Fr. (10) C. emunctus Fr. (10) C. mucifluus Fr. (10) C. mucosus (Bull.) Cooke (10) C. pluvius (Fr.: Fr.) Fr. (10) C. vanduzerensis A.H. Smith & Trappe (10) C. vibratilis (Fr.) Fr. (10) C. sp. (10) Cortinarius subg. Phlegmacium (9) 17 species C. allutus Fr. sensu Moser (10) C. caesiostramineus Rob. Henry (10) C. calochrous var coniferarum (10) (M.M.Moser) Quadr. C. cf. colymbadinus Fr. (10) C. elegantior var americanus M.M. Moser & (10) McKnight C. glaucopus (Schaeff.) Fr. (10) C. infractus Berk. (10) C. cf. miser M.M. Moser sensu Moser (10) C. multiformis (Fr.) Fr. (10) C. pallidifolius A.H.Sm. (10) C. papulosus Fr. (10) C. ponderosus A.H. Sm (10) C. cf. purpurascens (Fr.) Fr. (10) C. cf. subtortus (Pers.) Fr. (10) C. superbus A.H.Sm. (10) C. turmalis Fr. (10) C. cf. variipes Rob. Henry (10) C. sp (10) Cortinarius subg. Sericeocybe (9) 8 species C. cf. alboviolaceus (Pers.) Fr. (10) C. camphoratus (Fr.) Fr. (10) C. cyanites Fr. (10) C. traganus (Fr.) Fr. (7) C. traganus var. ochraceus M.M. Moser, (10) Ammirati & M.T. Seidl. C. sp (10) VIII Cortinarius subg. Telamonia (9) 33 species C. acutus (Pers.:Fr.) (10) C.albovariegatus (Velen.) Melot (10) C. angelesianus A.H. Smith (10) C. aurantiomarginatus Schaeff. (10) C. aff. barlowensis nom. prov. (10) not included C. aff. bibulus Quél. (10) C. biformis Fr./ subpurpureus A.H. Sm. (10) C. brunneus (Pers.) Fr. (10) in spring. Yellow veil. C. brunneus var glandicolor (Fr.) (10) H. Lindstr. & Melot C. aff. brunneus (10) C. cagei Melot (10) C. casimiri (Velen.) Huijsman (10) C. cedriolens M.M. Moser (10) C. cypriacus Fr. (10) C. damascenus Fr. (10) C. decipiens (Pers.) Fr. (10) C. depauperatus (J.E. Lange) Rob. Henry (10) C. detonsus (Fr.) Fr. (10) C. cf. dilutus (Pers.) Fr. (10) C. distans var olympianus A.H. Sm. (10) C. dolabratus Fr. (10) C. duracinus Fr. (10) C. erubescens M.M.Moser (10) C. evernius (Fr.) Fr. (10) C. fasciatus Fr. (10) C. flexipes (Pers.) Fr. (10) C. illuminus Fr. (10) C. imbutus Fr. (10) C. ionophyllus M.M. Moser (10) C. jubarinus Fr. (10) C. laniger Fr. (10) C. leucopus (Bull.) Fr. (10) C. miniatopus J.E. Lange (10) C. obtusus complex (10) several species C. ochrophyllus Fr. (10) C. psammocephalus (Bull.) Fr. (10) C. aff. quarciticus H. Lindstr. (10) C. renidens Fr. (10) C. rigidus (Scop.) Fr. (10) C. cf. saturninus (Fr.:) Fr. (10) C. cf. scandens Fr. (10) C. cf. scaurus (Fr.) Fr. (10) C. cf. stemmatus Fr. (10) C. umbilicatus P. Karst. (10) C. uraceus Fr. (10) C. aff. vernus H. Lindstr. & Melot (10) C. sp. (10) Cortinarius (Unknown subgenera) sp. (10) Cortinomyces sublilacinus (9) not included Craterellus neotubaeformis nom. prov. (10) not included Elaphomyces granulatus Fr. (2) (5) (6) (8) (9) Elaphomyces muricatus Fr. (6) (8) (9) Endogone lactiflua Berk. & Broome (6) (8) (9) IX Endogone pisiformis Link (8) Gautieria caudata (Harkn.) Zeller & C.W. (9) Dodge Gautieria monticola Harkn. (4) (5) (6) (8) (9) Gautieria sp. (2) Genabea cerebriformis (Harkn.) Trappe (2) (4) (8) (9) Genea harknessii Gilkey (2) (8) Genea intermedia Gilkey (2) (4) (8) (9) Geopora cooperi var. cooperi Harkn. (2) (9) Gomphidius glutinosus (Schaeff.) Fr. (1) (9) (10) Gomphidius oregonensis Peck (1) (3) Gomphidius smithii Singer (1) Gomphidius subroseus Kauffman (1) (3) (9) (10) Gomphidius tomentosus Murrill. (1) Gomphus clavatus (Pers.) Gray (9) (10) Gomphus floccosus (Schwein.) Singer (9) Hebeloma crustuliniforme (Bull.) Quél. (1) (9) (10) Hebeloma longicaudum (Pers.) P. Kumm. (10) Hebeloma mesophaeum gr. (Pers.) Fr. (3) (9) (10) Hebeloma perplexum A.H. Sm., V.S. (10) Evenson & Mitchel Hebeloma praeolidum A.H. Sm., V.S. (10) Evenson & Mitchel Hebeloma pumilum J.E. Lange (10) Hebeloma cf. sacchariolens Quél. (9) (10) Hebeloma cf. stenocystis J. Favre (10) Hebeloma sp. (10) Hydnoplicata gautierioides (9) not included Hydnotrya variiformis Gilkey (8) (9) Hydnotrya tulasnei Berk. & Broome (2) Hydnum repandum L. (1) (10) Hydnum umbilicatum Peck (9) (10) Hygrocybe flavescens (Kauffman) Singer (9) Hygrocybe laeta (Pers.) P. Kumm. (9) Hygrocybe miniata (Fr.) P. Kumm. (9) Hygrophorus agathosmus (Fr.) Fr. (9) (10) Hygrophorus atramentosus (Alb. & (10) Schwein.) H. Haas & Haller Hygrophorus bakerensis A.H. Sm. & Hesler (9) (10) Hygrophorus cf. calyptryformis (Berk.) Berk. (9) Hygrophorus cf. camarophyllus (Alb. & (9) Schwein.) Dumée, Grandjean & Maire Hygrophorus chrysodon (Batsch) Fr. (1) (9) Hygrophorus eburneus (Bull.) Fr. (9) (10) Hygrophorus gliocyclus Fr. (1) Hygrophorus odoratus A.H. Sm. & Hesler (10) Hygrophorus pusillus Peck. (3) Hymenogaster gilkeyae Zeller & C.W.Dodge (4) Hymenogaster parksii Zeller & C.W. Dodge (2) (4) Hymenogaster sublilacinus A.H. Sm. (8) Hysterangium aureum Zeller (9) Hysterangium coriaceum Hesse (4) (5) (6) (8) (9) Hysterangium crassirhachis Zeller & C.W (4) (6) (8) (9) Dodge Hysterangium crassum (Tul. & C. Tul.) E. (2) (4) X Fisch. Hysterangium occidentale Harkn. (2) Hysterangium separabile Zeller (2) Hysterangium setchellii Fisch. (6) (8) (9) not included Inocybe agglutinata Peck (10) Inocybe cf. amethystine Kuyper (10) Inocybe assimilata Britzelm. (10) Inocybe boltonii R. Heim ss Matheny (10) Inocybe aff. bresadolae Massee (10) Inocybe brunnea Quél. (3) Inocybe calamistrata (Fr.) Gillet (10) Inocybe castanea Peck (10) Inocybe catalaunica Singer (10) Inocybe cf. chrondroderma Stuntz nom prov (10) not included Inocybe cincinnata (Fr.) Quél. (10) I. cincinnata var major (S. Peterson) Kuyper (10) Inocybe cinnamomea A.H. Sm. (10) Inocybe cf. curvipes P. Karst. (10) Inocybe cf. earleana Kauffman (10) Inocybe cf. eutheloides Peck (10) Inocybe flavidolilacina (Britzelm.) Lapl. (10) Inocybe aff. flocculosa (Berk.) sacc. (10) I. aff. flocculosa var crocifolia (Herink) (10) Kuyper Inocybe cf. furfurea Kühner (10) Inocybe cf. fuscidula Velen. (10) Inocybe fuscodisca (Peck) Massee (10) Inocybe geophylla (Sowerby) P. Kumm. (3) (9)* (10) *I. geophyla complex: 3 species. Inocybe glabrodisca P.D. Orton (10) Inocybe grammata Quél. & Le Bret. (10) Inocybe griseolilacina J.E. Lange (10) Inocybe griseoscabrosa (Peck) Earle (10) Inocybe hirsuta var máxima A.H. Sm. (10) Inocybe hotsoniana D.E. Stuntz (10) Inocybe aff. inodora Velen. (10) Inocybe kauffmanii A.H. Sm. (10) Inocybe lacera (Fr.) P. Kumm. (10) Inocybe laetior D.E. Stuntz (10) Inocybe lanatodisca Kauffman (10) Inocybe langei R. Heim / hirtella Bres. (10) Inocybe cf. lanuginosa Cooke (9) (10) 7 species Inocybe cf. leptocystis G.F. Atk. (10) Inocybe leptophylla G.F. Atk. (10) Inocybe lilacina (Peck) Kauffman (3) (10) Inocybe maculata Boud. complex (9) 1 species Inocybe cf. margaritispora (Berk.) Sacc. (10) Inocybe mixtilis (Britzelm.) Sacc. complex (3) (9) (10) 3 species Inocybe nappies J.E. Lange (10) Inocybe nitidiuscula (Britzelm.) Lapl. (10) Inocybe obscura (Pers.) Gillet (3) Inocybe obscurobadia (J. Favre) Grund. & (10) D.E. Stuntz sensu Kuyper Inocybe olympiana A.H. Sm. (10) Inocybe praetervisa Quél. (3) (10) XI Inocybe pruinosa R. Heim. (10) Inocybe pudica Kühner complex (3) (9)* *3 species Inocybe pusio P. Karst. (10) Inocybe pyriodora (Pers.) P. Kumm. complex (9) 1 species Inocybe cf. queletii Maire & Konrad (10) Inocybe cf. retipes G.F. Atk. (10) Inocybe rimosa (Bull.) P. Kumm. (10) Inocybe sindonia (Fr.) P. Karst. (10) Inocybe sororia Kauffman complex (9) (10) 44 species Inocybe cf. splendens R. Heim (10) Inocybe cf. squarrosa Rea (10) Inocybe suaveolens D.E. Stuntz complex (9) (10) 1 species Inocybe subbrunnea Kühner (3) Inocybe subcarpta Kühner & Boursier (10) Inocybe subdestricta Kauffman (3) (10) Inocybe cf. subochracea (Peck) Earle (10) Inocybe umboninota Peck sensu Peck (10) Inocybe xanthomelas Boursier & Kühner (10) Inocybe sp. (10) several species Laccaria amethysto­occidentalis G.M. Muell. (9) (10) 1 species complex Laccaria bicolor (Maire) P.D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • And Interspecific Hybridiation in Agaric Fungi
    Mycologia, 105(6), 2013, pp. 1577–1594. DOI: 10.3852/13-041 # 2013 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Evolutionary consequences of putative intra- and interspecific hybridization in agaric fungi Karen W. Hughes1 to determine the outcome of hybridization events. Ronald H. Petersen Within Armillaria mellea and Amanita citrina f. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of lavendula, we found evidence of interbreeding and Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-1100 recombination. Within G. dichrous and H. flavescens/ D. Jean Lodge chlorophana, hybrids were identified but there was Center for Forest Mycology Research, USDA-Forest no evidence for F2 or higher progeny in natural Service, Northern Research Station, Box 137, Luquillo, populations suggesting that the hybrid fruitbodies Puerto Rico 00773-1377 might be an evolutionary dead end and that the Sarah E. Bergemann genetically divergent Mendelian populations from which they were derived are, in fact, different species. Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Biology, PO Box 60, Murfreesboro Tennessee 37132 The association between ITS haplotype divergence of less than 5% (Armillaria mellea 5 2.6% excluding Kendra Baumgartner gaps; Amanita citrina f. lavendula 5 3.3%) with the USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Department of presence of putative recombinants and greater than Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 5% (Gymnopus dichrous 5 5.7%; Hygrocybe flavescens/ chlorophana 5 14.1%) with apparent failure of F1 2 Rodham E. Tulloss hybrids to produce F2 or higher progeny in popula- PO Box 57, Roosevelt, New Jersey 08555-0057 tions may suggest a correlation between genetic Edgar Lickey distance and reproductive isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sporeprint, Spring 2015
    LONG ISLAND MYCOLOGICAL CLUB http://limyco.org Available in full color on our website VOLUME 23, NUMBER 1, SPRING, 2015 FINDINGS AFIELD THE SEASON’S BOUNTY: 2015 Once again, Morels eluded us completely, so we have now failed to find any Black Morels at our usual collecting spot since 2011, and only a few singleton Yellow Morels that popped up here and there, except for one lucky member of the public who found thirty in Freeport under an old Cherry tree. We may have to ven- ture off-island in the future if we wish to collect Morels. Foray chair Dennis Aita of the NY Mycological Society informed me that their Morel season was lackluster, but there were oases of plenty, as wit- nessed by our webmaster Dale’s unexpected bonanza of Yellow Mo- rels on May 17 in Ulster County.(See LI Sporeprint Summer 2014.) Mean temperatures were below normal Jan thru March, and the Hygrophorus amygdalinus consequent slow soil warming delayed Spring fruiting of Morels somewhat. Will this year’s deep freeze, with the coldest February in Regular readers of this column eighty years, cause an even more pronounced delay or will the insu- might find it odd to find this one de- lating effect of deep snow cover ameliorate this process? It’s any- voted to a species which we have been one’s guess. collecting for some years, rather than Overall, last year was a consider- a newly encountered one. While Hy- able improvement over 2013, when dry grophorus amygdalinus (sometimes conditions forced us to cancel 18 forays; under a different name) is familiar to only 9, half as many, were cancelled in many of us as the small gray, almond 2014 due to lack of fungi.
    [Show full text]
  • Mushrumors the Newsletter of the Northwest Mushroomers Association Volume 20 Issue 3 September - November 2009
    MushRumors The Newsletter of the Northwest Mushroomers Association Volume 20 Issue 3 September - November 2009 2009 Mushroom Season Blasts into October with a Flourish A Surprising Turnout at the Annual Fall Show by Our Fungal Friends, and a Visit by David Arora Highlighted this Extraordinary Year for the Northwest Mushroomers On the heels of a year where the weather in Northwest Washington could be described as anything but nor- mal, to the surprise of many, include yours truly, it was actually a good year for mushrooms and the Northwest Mushroomers Association shined again at our traditional fall exhibit. The members, as well as the mushrooms, rose to the occasion, despite brutal conditions for collecting which included a sideways driving rain (which we photo by Pam Anderson thought had come too late), and even a thunderstorm, as we prepared to gather for the greatly anticipated sorting of our catch at the hallowed Bloedel Donovan Community Building. I wondered, not without some trepidation, about what fungi would actually show up for this years’ event. Buck McAdoo, Dick Morrison, and I had spent several harrowing hours some- what lost in the woods off the South Pass Road in a torrential downpour, all the while being filmed for posterity by Buck’s step-son, Travis, a videographer creating a documentary about mushrooming. I had to wonder about the resolve of our mem- bers to go forth in such conditions in or- In This Issue: Fabulous first impressions: Marjorie Hooks der to find the mush- David Arora Visits Bellingham crafted another artwork for the centerpiece.
    [Show full text]
  • Tricholoma (Fr.) Staude in the Aegean Region of Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Botany Turk J Bot (2019) 43: 817-830 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/bot-1812-52 Tricholoma (Fr.) Staude in the Aegean region of Turkey İsmail ŞEN*, Hakan ALLI Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey Received: 24.12.2018 Accepted/Published Online: 30.07.2019 Final Version: 21.11.2019 Abstract: The Tricholoma biodiversity of the Aegean region of Turkey has been determined and reported in this study. As a consequence of field and laboratory studies, 31 Tricholoma species have been identified, and five of them (T. filamentosum, T. frondosae, T. quercetorum, T. rufenum, and T. sudum) have been reported for the first time from Turkey. The identification key of the determined taxa is given with this study. Key words: Tricholoma, biodiversity, identification key, Aegean region, Turkey 1. Introduction & Intini (this species, called “sedir mantarı”, is collected by Tricholoma (Fr.) Staude is one of the classic genera of local people for both its gastronomic and financial value) Agaricales, and more than 1200 members of this genus and T. virgatum var. fulvoumbonatum E. Sesli, Contu & were globally recorded in Index Fungorum to date (www. Vizzini (Intini et al., 2003; Vizzini et al., 2015). Additionally, indexfungorum.org, access date 23 April 2018), but many Heilmann-Clausen et al. (2017) described Tricholoma of them are placed in other genera such as Lepista (Fr.) ilkkae Mort. Chr., Heilm.-Claus., Ryman & N. Bergius as W.G. Sm., Melanoleuca Pat., and Lyophyllum P. Karst. a new species and they reported that this species grows in (Christensen and Heilmann-Clausen, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • News Sheet N 22
    Herefordshire Fungus Survey Group o News Sheet N 22: Autumn2011 Pluteus hispidulus – Lady’s Coppice (27/7/2011) Contents Caption Competition Page 2 Recorder’s Report, January - August 2011 Page 3 Busy Lizzie Plague hits Borders Page 5 Gardening for Rusts Page 6 Look out for Lesser Known Relatives! Page 9 Fungal Fragments Page 10 The Enjoyment of Fungi, Victorian Style Page 11 The contents of this newsletter are the copyright property of the Herefordshire Fungus Survey Group. Please do not reproduce material from this publication without prior permission from the Editor. Thank you. Roger discusses Plasmopara obducens, the cause of the President: Ted Blackwell Busy Lizzie downy mildew and of some concern to the UK horticultural industry whilst, in contrast, Debbie enthuses about rusts on our garden plants. Never let it be said that Recorder: Jo Weightman your News Sheet does not give a balanced picture! WelcomeChairman: to the Autumn 2011 Roger News SheetEvans – at last! Ted has continued to delve into the Transactions of the Firstly, as I said at the AGM, my apologies for this Woolhope Field Naturalists Club and has used snippets of issueSecretary: being so late. However, Mike I hope Stroud that it will have these to give us a picture of how the members ‘enjoyed’ been well worth waiting for: our contributors have, as fungi in the early days of foraying. We are indebted to always,Treasurer: come up trumps (on time!)Margaret - many Hawkins thanks to Peter & Christine Thwaites for allowing us to use some of all of them. Peter’s lovely illustrations of fungi as a background to the As you will see from the Jo’s ‘Recorder’s Report’, there text (although, unfortunately, they are not all mentioned in have been two finds of particular interest jn Herefordshire the article).
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Spore Amyloidity in Agaricales Under Light Microscope: the Case Study of Tricholoma Alfredo Vizzini1*, Giovanni Consiglio2 and Ledo Setti3
    Vizzini et al. IMA Fungus (2020) 11:24 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-020-00046-8 IMA Fungus RESEARCH Open Access Testing spore amyloidity in Agaricales under light microscope: the case study of Tricholoma Alfredo Vizzini1*, Giovanni Consiglio2 and Ledo Setti3 Abstract Although species of the genus Tricholoma are currently considered to produce inamyloid spores, a novel standardized method to test sporal amyloidity (which involves heating the sample in Melzer’s reagent) showed evidence that in the tested species of this genus, which belong in all 10 sections currently recognized from Europe, the spores are amyloid. In two species, T. josserandii and T. terreum, the spores are also partly dextrinoid. This result provides strong indication that a positive reaction of the spores in Melzer’s reagent could be a character shared by all genera in Tricholomataceae s. str. Keywords: Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota, Iodine, Melzer’s reagent, nrITS sequences, Pre-heating, Taxonomy of Tricholomataceae Introduction of the starch–iodine interaction is extremely complex It has been known for about 150 years that some asco- and still remains imperfectly known (Bluhm and Zugen- mycete and basidiomycete sporomata may contain maier 1981; Immel and Lichtenthaler 2000; Shen et al. elements which stain grey to blue-black with iodine- 2013; Du et al. 2014; Okuda et al. 2020). containing solutions. Such a staining was termed amyl- An overview of the historical use of Melzer’s was pro- oid reaction, sometimes written as I+ or J+ (the term vided by Leonard (2006). Iodine was used in Mycology “amyloid” being derived from the Latin amyloideus, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd. Thesis Sana Jabeen.Pdf
    ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGAL COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATED WITH HIMALAYAN CEDAR FROM PAKISTAN A dissertation submitted to the University of the Punjab in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BOTANY by SANA JABEEN DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB LAHORE, PAKISTAN JUNE 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE NO. Summary i Dedication iii Acknowledgements iv CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2 Literature review 5 Aims and objectives 11 CHAPTER 3 Materials and methods 12 3.1. Sampling site description 12 3.2. Sampling strategy 14 3.3. Sampling of sporocarps 14 3.4. Sampling and preservation of fruit bodies 14 3.5. Morphological studies of fruit bodies 14 3.6. Sampling of morphotypes 15 3.7. Soil sampling and analysis 15 3.8. Cleaning, morphotyping and storage of ectomycorrhizae 15 3.9. Morphological studies of ectomycorrhizae 16 3.10. Molecular studies 16 3.10.1. DNA extraction 16 3.10.2. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) 17 3.10.3. Sequence assembly and data mining 18 3.10.4. Multiple alignments and phylogenetic analysis 18 3.11. Climatic data collection 19 3.12. Statistical analysis 19 CHAPTER 4 Results 22 4.1. Characterization of above ground ectomycorrhizal fungi 22 4.2. Identification of ectomycorrhizal host 184 4.3. Characterization of non ectomycorrhizal fruit bodies 186 4.4. Characterization of saprobic fungi found from fruit bodies 188 4.5. Characterization of below ground ectomycorrhizal fungi 189 4.6. Characterization of below ground non ectomycorrhizal fungi 193 4.7. Identification of host taxa from ectomycorrhizal morphotypes 195 4.8.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2012 Species List Annex October 2012 Lummi Island Foray Species List
    MushRumors The Newsletter of the Northwest Mushroomers Association Volume 23, Issue 2 Summer - Fall, 2012 Record 88 Days Without Measurable Precipitation Defines Northwest Washington’s 2012 Mushroom Season As June had faded into the first week of July, after a second consecutive year of far above average rainfall, no one could have anticipated that by the end of the second week of July we would see virtually no more rain until October 13th, only days before the Northwest Mushroomer’s Association annual Fall Mushroom Show. The early part of the season had offered up bumper crops of the prince (Agaricus augustus), and, a bit later, similar Photo by Jack Waytz quantities of the sulphur shelf (Laetiporus coniferarum). There were also some anomalous fruitings, which seemed completely inexplicable, such as matsutake mushrooms found in June and an exquisite fruiting of Boletus edulis var. grand edulis in Mt. Vernon at the end of the first week of July, under birch, (Pictured on page 2 of this letter) and Erin Moore ran across the king at the Nooksack in Deming, under western hemlock! As was the case last year, there was a very robust fruiting of lobster mushrooms in advance of the rains. It would seem that they need little, or no moisture at all, to have significant flushes. Apparently, a combination of other conditions, which remain hidden from the 3 princes, 3 pounds! mushroom hunters, herald their awakening. The effects of the sudden drought were predictably profound on the mycological landscape. I ventured out to Baker Lake on September 30th, and to my dismay, the luxuriant carpet of moss which normally supports a myriad of Photo by Jack Waytz species had the feel of astro turf, and I found not a single mushroom there, of any species.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION Cooperstown, New York
    BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION Cooperstown, New York 50th ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Photo credit: Holly Waterfield STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK COLLEGE AT ONEONTA OCCASIONAL PAPERS PUBLISHED BY THE BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION No. 1. The diet and feeding habits of the terrestrial stage of the common newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Raf.). M.C. MacNamara, April 1976 No. 2. The relationship of age, growth and food habits to the relative success of the whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) and the cisco (C. artedi) in Otsego Lake, New York. A.J. Newell, April 1976. No. 3. A basic limnology of Otsego Lake (Summary of research 1968-75). W. N. Harman and L. P. Sohacki, June 1976. No. 4. An ecology of the Unionidae of Otsego Lake with special references to the immature stages. G. P. Weir, November 1977. No. 5. A history and description of the Biological Field Station (1966-1977). W. N. Harman, November 1977. No. 6. The distribution and ecology of the aquatic molluscan fauna of the Black River drainage basin in northern New York. D. E Buckley, April 1977. No. 7. The fishes of Otsego Lake. R. C. MacWatters, May 1980. No. 8. The ecology of the aquatic macrophytes of Rat Cove, Otsego Lake, N.Y. F. A Vertucci, W. N. Harman and J. H. Peverly, December 1981. No. 9. Pictorial keys to the aquatic mollusks of the upper Susquehanna. W. N. Harman, April 1982. No. 10. The dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata: Anisoptera and Zygoptera) of Otsego County, New York with illustrated keys to the genera and species. L.S. House III, September 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2014
    MushRumors The Newsletter of the Northwest Mushroomers Association Volume 25, Issue 4 December 2014 After Arid Start, 2014 Mushroom Season Flourishes It All Came Together By Chuck Nafziger It all came together for the 2014 Wild Mushroom Show; an October with the perfect amount of rain for abundant mushrooms, an enthusiastic volunteer base, a Photo by Vince Biciunas great show publicity team, a warm sunny show day, and an increased public interest in foraging. Nadine Lihach, who took care of the admissions, reports that we blew away last year's record attendance by about 140 people. Add to that all the volunteers who put the show together, and we had well over 900 people involved. That's a huge event for our club. Nadine said, "... this was a record year at the entry gate: 862 attendees (includes children). Our previous high was in 2013: 723 attendees. Success is more measured in the happiness index of those attending, and many people stopped by on their way out to thank us for the wonderful show. Kids—and there were many—were especially delighted, and I'm sure there were some future mycophiles and mycologists in Sunday's crowd. The mushroom display A stunning entry display greets visitors arriving at the show. by the door was effective, as always, at luring people in. You could actually see the kids' eyes getting bigger as they surveyed the weird mushrooms, and twice during the day kids ran back to our table to tell us that they had spotted the mushroom fairy. There were many repeat adult visitors, too, often bearing mushrooms for identification.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Fungus Fair
    Oakland Museum, 6-7 December 2003 Mycological Society of San Francisco Catalogue of Fungus Fair Introduction ......................................................................................................................2 History ..............................................................................................................................3 Statistics ...........................................................................................................................4 Total collections (excluding "sp.") Numbers of species by multiplicity of collections (excluding "sp.") Numbers of taxa by genus (excluding "sp.") Common names ................................................................................................................6 New names or names not recently recorded .................................................................7 Numbers of field labels from tables Species found - listed by name .......................................................................................8 Species found - listed by multiplicity on forays ..........................................................13 Forays ranked by numbers of species .........................................................................16 Larger forays ranked by proportion of unique species ...............................................17 Species found - by county and by foray ......................................................................18 Field and Display Label examples ................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • OF UKRAINE © Chvikov V., Prylutskyi O
    Біорізноманіття, екологія та експериментальна біологія, 2020, №2 MYCOLOGY UDC 582.284 (477) Prylutskyi O. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5730-517X Chvikov V. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-3996 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF HYGROPHORACEAE (AGARICALES, BASIDIOMYCOTA) OF UKRAINE © Chvikov V., Prylutskyi O. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University [email protected] , [email protected] https://doi.org/10.34142/2708-5848.2020.22.2.01 Hygrophoraceae is a family within Agaricales, which comprises 26 genera and approximately 690 agaricoid species, including ectomycorrhizal, lichen-forming, bryophilous, humus and litter decomposing fungi. Some of these species especially those from genera Cuphophyllus, Hygrocybe, Neohygrocybe and Porpolomopsis are associated with natural grasslands and show extreme sensitivity to the presence of nitrogen-containing fertilizers in their substrate. This makes them indicative species of grasslands of high conservation value. While casual observations of Hygrophoraceae of Ukraine were incorporated in studies of agaricoid fungi as a whole, this family has never been in the focus of special research. Previously accumulated data on the diversity of Hygrophoraceae in Ukraine must be aggregated and revised. We have summarized all available data on the occurrences of Hygrophoraceae in Ukraine, including published papers, open databases, citizen science observations, and the previously unpublished original collection materials. Also, we provide an original description of the rare European species Haasiella venustissima (Fr.) Kotl. & Pouzar ex Chiaffi & Surault, which is reported for the first time from the territory of Ukraine. The resulting checklist of Hygrophoraceae of Ukraine includes 66 species. Leading genera are Hygrophorus (22 species), Hygrocybe (17) and Arrhenia (10); 5 species among them (Hygrocybe punicea, Hyrgocybe splendidissima, Neohygrocybe nitrata, Neohygrocybe ovina, Porpolomopsis calyptriformis) are threatened and according to “IUCN Red List” considered “Vulnerable”.
    [Show full text]