DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Ann Arbor Michigan City Charter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Ann Arbor Michigan City Charter CITY OF ANN ARBOR MICHIGAN CITY CHARTER Adopted April 9, 1956 (with amendments through November 2020) Ann Arbor, Michigan City Charter 2 CITY OF ANN ARBOR MICHIGAN CITY CHARTER Adopted April 9, 1956 Amended on the following dates: May 22, 1956 Apr. 3, 1992 Nov. 3, 2020 Apr. 6, 1964 May 26, 1993 Apr. 6, 1964 Nov. 8 1994 Nov. 3, 1964 Nov. 7, 1995 Nov. 8, 1966 Nov 5, 1996 Apr. 3, 1967 Apr. 7, 1999 Apr. 1, 1968 Nov. 2, 1999 Apr. 7, 1969 Nov, 7, 2000 Nov. 3, 1969 Nov. 6, 2001 Apr. 2, 1973 Nov. 4, 2003 Apr. 2, 1974 Nov. 2, 2004 Apr. 7, 1977 Nov. 7, 2006 Apr. 6, 1978 Nov. 4, 2008 Apr. 4, 1983 Nov. 3, 2009 Apr. 2, 1984 Nov. 8, 2011 Apr. 4, 1988 Nov. 6, 2012 Apr. 3, 1989 Nov. 4, 2014 Apr. 2, 1990 Aug. 2, 2016 Apr. 1, 1991 Nov. 6, 2018 Ann Arbor, Michigan City Charter 3 Ann Arbor, Michigan City Charter 4 Table of Contents CITY CHARTER ............................................................................................................ 11 PREAMBLE ................................................................................................................ 11 CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................................. 11 NAME AND BOUNDARIES .......................................................................................... 11 Name .......................................................................................................................... 11 Boundaries ................................................................................................................. 11 Wards ......................................................................................................................... 11 Center of the City ....................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 2 .................................................................................................................. 12 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................... 12 Definitions .................................................................................................................. 12 CHAPTER 3 .................................................................................................................. 13 GENERAL MUNICIPAL POWERS ............................................................................... 13 General Powers of the City ........................................................................................ 13 CHAPTER 4 .................................................................................................................. 13 COUNCIL AND MAYOR ............................................................................................... 13 The Council ................................................................................................................ 13 The Mayor .................................................................................................................. 13 The Mayor Pro Tem ................................................................................................... 14 Meetings of the Council .............................................................................................. 15 Veto Power of Mayor .................................................................................................. 16 CHAPTER 5 .................................................................................................................. 17 ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................... 17 City Administrator ....................................................................................................... 17 City Attorney ............................................................................................................... 18 Clerk ........................................................................................................................... 19 Treasurer .................................................................................................................... 20 Assessor .................................................................................................................... 20 Controller .................................................................................................................... 20 Administrative Departments ....................................................................................... 21 Police Department ...................................................................................................... 21 Fire Department ......................................................................................................... 22 Department of Public Works ...................................................................................... 23 Utilities Department .................................................................................................... 24 Department of Health ................................................................................................. 24 Department of Parks and Recreation ......................................................................... 25 Planning Department ................................................................................................. 25 Department of Building and Safety Engineering ........................................................ 26 Additional Departmental Powers and Duties .............................................................. 26 Boards and Commissions .......................................................................................... 27 Personnel Administration ........................................................................................... 27 CHAPTER 6 .................................................................................................................. 28 CHAPTER 7 .................................................................................................................. 28 Ann Arbor, Michigan City Charter 5 CITY LEGISLATION ..................................................................................................... 28 Legislative Power ....................................................................................................... 28 Prior Legislation Preserved ........................................................................................ 28 Introduction, Consideration, and Style of Ordinances ................................................ 28 Publication of Ordinances .......................................................................................... 29 Penalties .................................................................................................................... 30 Time Limit for Prosecution of Ordinance Violations ................................................... 30 Proceedings for Prosecution of Ordinance Violations ................................................ 30 Technical Codes ........................................................................................................ 30 Judicial Notice of City Ordinances .............................................................................. 31 Initiative of Ordinances ............................................................................................... 31 CHAPTER 8 .................................................................................................................. 32 BUDGET PROCEDURE AND GENERAL FINANCE ................................................... 32 Fiscal Year ................................................................................................................. 32 Budget Procedure ...................................................................................................... 32 Budget Statement of City Administrator ..................................................................... 32 Budget Proposal ......................................................................................................... 32 Budget Proposal a Public Record .............................................................................. 32 Adoption of Budget ..................................................................................................... 32 City Tax Limit ............................................................................................................. 33 Failure of Council to Adopt Budget ............................................................................ 33 Effects of Adoption of Budget .................................................................................... 34 Transfer of Appropriations .......................................................................................... 34 Budget Control ........................................................................................................... 34 Contractual Claims Against City ................................................................................. 34 Notice to City of Claim for Injuries .............................................................................. 35 Withdrawal of City Funds ........................................................................................... 35 Independent Audit ...................................................................................................... 35 Funds for Public Improvement ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Country Coding Units Version 3 (December 2014)
    Country Coding Units Version 3 (December 2014) Principal Investigators Research Assistant Michael Coppedge – U. of Notre Dame Vlad Ciobanu – U. of Gothenburg John Gerring – Boston University Staffan I. Lindberg –U. of Gothenburg Jan Teorell – Lund University Suggested citation: Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, Vlad Ciobanu. 2014. “Varieties of Democracy: Country Coding Units v3.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. 1 This document lists (a) every country in the eventual V-Dem database, (b) the years for which we have collect data or plan to collect data (in parentheses next to the entry); (c) the polities that comprise each country’s 20th century history (even if falling outside the time-period that we wish to code); and (d) the borders of each country (wherever this might be unclear). Many dates are approximate due to the inconclusive nature of a country’s history. Note that changes in sovereignty often occur by stages, and marking these stages with specific dates can be challenging. General sources for compiling this document include Wikipedia and Statesman.org. Additional sources, along with notes pertaining to specific countries, empires, and federations are contained in a separate document: “Countries, Empires, Elections (misc notes)” “Country” A V-Dem “country” is a political unit enjoying at least some degree of functional and/or formal sovereignty. This means that fully sovereign nation-states as well as colonies and protectorates and semi-autonomous administrative districts may qualify as countries. A territory must claim sovereignty at some point in its history in order to qualify. Thus, Somaliland qualifies but not Puntland.
    [Show full text]
  • Wooster – a Charter City Charter Ballot Performance Revisions Dashboard
    CITY NEWSLETTER Fall 2020 What’s Inside WOOSTER – A CHARTER CITY CHARTER BALLOT PERFORMANCE REVISIONS DASHBOARD Leaf Pick Up | Trick or Treat | DORA | Recycling Info | Hazardous Waste Collection Mayor Breneman’s Message As we are all aware, COVID’s appearance in our community started quite a few months ago. Even though the virus is still present in our city and county, and we City Newsletter | Fall 2020 have experienced sickness and tragically loss, I want to focus on the many good things we have going for us. We are truly blessed to live, work, and have family and friends Inside This Edition in this beautiful city and county we call home. Message from the Mayor 1 Please take time to step away from the news media, Wooster – A Charter City 2 election turmoil, and daily briefings to reflect on what Ballot Summaries 3 makes Wooster and our agrarian heritage so special in Performance Dashboard 9 life today. We are far better off living through this virus than what was originally predicted. Our city is operating well in all of our critical Trick or Treat 13 service lines (Hospital, Police, Fire/EMS, Water, Wastewater, Maintenance and Getting Noticed 14 Utilities), and we have a solid economy fueling our lives and needs. Santa’s Mailbox 14 Take a moment to enjoy all the good that surrounds us; fall colors, starry nights, Recycling 15 cool weather, friends and family, holidays, and our health. There are many things Hazardous Waste 15 that try to pull us down; make sure you balance those with the abundance of good Infrastructure Updates 16 that surrounds every day! Normal life is coming.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS CORPORATE POWERS 2 GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION 2 CITY MANAGER ALTERNATIVE 3 ELECTIONS 9 LEGISLATION 11 FINANCE 13 SCHEDULE 18 INDEX 22 CITY OF ROCKFORD CHARTER We, the people of the City of Rockford, pursuant to the authority granted by the Constitution and laws of the State of Michigan, in order to secure the benefits of efficient self-government and otherwise promote our common welfare, do hereby ordain and establish this Charter. CORPORATE POWERS Section 1. The municipal corporation now existing and known as the Village of Rockford, shall continue to be a body politic and corporate under the name City of Rockford, and include all territory described as follows: The whole of section thirty-six (36) in township nine (9) north of range eleven (11) west, and the fractional north half of the north half of section one (1) in township eight (8) north of range eleven (11) west, as originally incorporated as the Village of Rockford by Act No. 537 of the Local Acts of 1887, in Kent County, Michigan. Section 2. The City shall have power to exercise any and all of the powers which cities are, or may hereafter be, permitted to exercise or to provide in their charters under the constitution and laws of the State of Michigan, as fully and completely as though the powers were specifically enumerated herein, and to do any act to advance the interests of the City, the good government and prosperity of the municipality and its inhabitants, except for such limitations and restrictions as are provided in this Charter, and no enumeration of particular powers of the City in this Charter shall be held to be exclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • National Administrative Department of Statistics
    NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS Methodology for the Codification of the Political- Administrative Division of Colombia -DIVIPOLA- 0 NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS JORGE BUSTAMANTE ROLDÁN Director CHRISTIAN JARAMILLO HERRERA Deputy Director MARIO CHAMIE MAZZILLO General Secretary Technical Directors NELCY ARAQUE GARCIA Regulation, Planning, Standardization and Normalization EDUARDO EFRAÍN FREIRE DELGADO Methodology and Statistical Production LILIANA ACEVEDO ARENAS Census and Demography MIGUEL ÁNGEL CÁRDENAS CONTRERAS Geostatistics ANA VICTORIA VEGA ACEVEDO Synthesis and National Accounts CAROLINA GUTIÉRREZ HERNÁNDEZ Diffusion, Marketing and Statistical Culture National Administrative Department of Statistics – DANE MIGUEL ÁNGEL CÁRDENAS CONTRERAS Geostatistics Division Geostatistical Research and Development Coordination (DIG) DANE Cesar Alberto Maldonado Maya Olga Marina López Salinas Proofreading in Spanish: Alba Lucía Núñez Benítez Translation: Juan Belisario González Sánchez Proofreading in English: Ximena Díaz Gómez CONTENTS Page PRESENTATION 6 INTRODUCTION 7 1. BACKGROUND 8 1.1. Evolution of the Political-Administrative Division of Colombia 8 1.2. Evolution of the Codification of the Political-Administrative Division of Colombia 12 2. DESIGN OF DIVIPOLA 15 2.1. Thematic/methodological design 15 2.1.1. Information needs 15 2.1.2. Objectives 15 2.1.3. Scope 15 2.1.4. Reference framework 16 2.1.5. Nomenclatures and Classifications used 22 2.1.6. Methodology 24 2.2 DIVIPOLA elaboration design 27 2.2.1. Collection or compilation of information 28 2.3. IT Design 28 2.3.1. DIVIPOLA Administration Module 28 2.4. Design of Quality Control Methods and Mechanisms 32 2.4.1. Quality Control Mechanism 32 2.5. Products Delivery and Diffusion 33 2.5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Cities
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 27 (2018-2019) Issue 3 Symposium: Rights Protection in Article 6 International Criminal Law and Beyond March 2019 Charter Cities Lan Cao Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the International Law Commons, and the International Trade Law Commons Repository Citation Lan Cao, Charter Cities, 27 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 717 (2019), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/ wmborj/vol27/iss3/6 Copyright c 2019 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj CHARTER CITIES Lan Cao* INTRODUCTION Globalization has produced a mongrelized, hybrid, and heterogeneous reality that transcends national territory. For example, in today’s globalized world, corporate products are frequently globally sourced and produced. “A Pontiac Le Mans, osten- sibly a General Motors product of American nationality, is in fact a globally com- posite product involving South Korean assembly; Japanese engines, transaxles and electronics; German design and style engineering; Taiwanese, Singaporean, and Japanese small components; British advertising and marketing; and Irish and Bar- badian data processing.”1 Is this an American product or not? “Products appear to be made everywhere and also nowhere in particular, as shown on the following com- puter circuit label: ‘Made in one or more of the following countries: Korea, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Mauritius, Thailand, Indonesia, Mexico, Philip- pines. The exact country of origin is unknown.’”2 Even national governance has become more hybridized under the influence of the forces of globalization.3 The domestic autonomy of states must now contend * Professor Cao is the Betty Hutton Williams Professor of International Economic Law at the Fowler School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laws on the Ethnic Minority Autonomous Regions in China: Legal Norms and Practices Haiting Zhang
    Loyola University Chicago International Law Review Volume 9 Article 3 Issue 2 Spring/Summer 2012 2012 The Laws on the Ethnic Minority Autonomous Regions in China: Legal Norms and Practices Haiting Zhang Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/lucilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Haiting Zhang The Laws on the Ethnic Minority Autonomous Regions in China: Legal Norms and Practices, 9 Loy. U. Chi. Int'l L. Rev. 249 (2012). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/lucilr/vol9/iss2/3 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago International Law Review by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE LAWS ON THE ETHNIC MINORITY AUTONOMous REGIONS IN CHINA: LEGAL NoRMS AND PRACTICES Haiting Zhang t I. Introduction... ............................ 249 II. Regulated Autonomous Powers of the Ethnic Minority Autonomous Regions.................................. 251 A. Autonomous Legislation Powers ....................... 252 B. Special Personnel Arrangements ....................... 252 C. Other Autonomous Powers .......................... 253 III. Problems in the Operation of the Regional Ethnic Autonomous System: The Gap Between Law and Practice ................. 254 A. Local Governmental Nature of the Autonomous Agencies ... 254 B. The Tale of Regional Autonomy Regulations: Insufficient Exercise of the Autonomous Legislation Power ............ 255 C. Behind the Personnel Arrangement: Party Politics and the Ethnic Minority Regional Autonomy ................... 257 D. The Vulnerable Autonomy............................ 259 E. The Economic Gap and the Natural Resource Exploitation Issue .......................................... 260 IV. Seeking Legal Guarantees: Improving the Exercise of the Autonomous Powers..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Charter for the City of Pensacola
    CHARTER FOR THE CITY OF PENSACOLA PREAMBLE We the people of the City of Pensacola, under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, in order to secure the benefits of local self-government and to provide for an honest, effective, and accountable Mayor-Council government, do hereby adopt this charter and confer upon the City the following powers, subject to the following restrictions, and prescribed by the following procedures and governmental structure. By this action, we secure the benefits of home rule and affirm the values of representative democracy, professional management, strong political leadership, citizen participation, and regional cooperation. ARTICLE I GENERAL POWERS OF THE CITY Section 1.01.General Powers and Corporate Existence. The City of Pensacola (“City”), located in Escambia County, Florida, shall have all governmental, corporate, and proprietary powers to enable it to conduct municipal government, perform municipal functions and render municipal services, and may exercise any power for municipal purposes except when expressly prohibited by law. Section 1.02. Construction. The powers of the City under this Charter shall be construed liberally in favor of the City, and the specific mention of particular powers in the Charter shall not be construed as limiting in any way the general power granted in this Article. Section 1.03. Intergovernmental Relations. The City may participate by contract or otherwise with any governmental entity of the State of Florida or any other state or states or the United States of America in the performance of any activity which one or more of such entities has the authority to undertake.
    [Show full text]
  • The Peace of Augsburg in Three Imperial Cities by Istvan
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Waterloo's Institutional Repository Biconfessionalism and Tolerance: The Peace of Augsburg in Three Imperial Cities by Istvan Szepesi A thesis presented to the University Of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2016 © Istvan Szepesi 2016 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract In contrast to the atmosphere of mistrust and division between confessions that was common to most polities during the Reformation era, the Peace of Augsburg, signed in 1555, declared the free imperial cities of the Holy Roman Empire a place where both Catholics and Lutherans could live together in peace. While historians readily acknowledge the exceptional nature of this clause of the Peace, they tend to downplay its historical significance through an undue focus on its long-term failures. In order to challenge this interpretation, this paper examines the successes and failures of the free imperial cities’ implementation of the Peace through a comparative analysis of religious coexistence in Augsburg, Cologne, and Nuremberg during the Peace’s 63- year duration. This investigation reveals that while religious coexistence did eventually fail first in Nuremberg and then in Cologne, the Peace made major strides in the short term which offer important insights into the nature of tolerance and confessional conflict in urban Germany during the late Reformation era.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter City Toronto Proposal Starting the Conversation Around Empowering Toronto and Other Canadian Cities Fall 2019
    Charter City Toronto Proposal Starting the Conversation Around Empowering Toronto and Other Canadian Cities Fall 2019 Contents Proposal Overview 3 The Case for a City Charter 6 The Charter Proposal 10 A. Governance 11 B. Constitutional Protection 12 C. Powers and Authority 14 Exclusive City Jurisdictions Land Use Planning 15 Streets 15 Housing 16 Local Transit 16 Health 17 Education 17 Shared Jurisdictions Human Services 18 Immigration and Settlement 19 Police and Security 19 D. Resources: Revenue and Finances 20 E. Access, Equity, and Inclusion 22 The Bigger Picture 23 Contact Us: Proposal Developed by: Email Henrich Bechmann Alan Kasperski [email protected] David Del Grande Sean Manners Website Doug Earl Sean Meagher CharterCityToronto.ca Merrilee Evans Ashley Quan Facebook Russ Ford Pedram Rahbari Tim Grant Ceta Rankhalawansingh Charter City Toronto Rob Jamieson John Sewell Twitter John Jeffrey Adam Smith @ CharterCity_TO Beth Levy North York | Photo Credit: benny_lin, Flickr Proposal Overview There’s been a lot of talk lately about empowering the city of Toronto and other big cities. Adopting a City Charter is often mentioned as a way to give the city the power and authority it needs to govern its own affairs. But what would a City Charter look like? What would be in it? What would it do for cities? This proposal is an attempt to begin that conversation. Two-Part Process Charter City Toronto proposes a two-part process toward greater power and autonomy for the city of Toronto. We believe this can serve as a template for other cities in Ontario and Canada who wish to achieve greater control over their own affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growing Importance of Municipal Empowerment in the Canadian Federation and the Need for a “Big Cities Collective”
    The Growing Importance of Municipal Empowerment in the Canadian Federation and the Need for a “Big Cities Collective” Lauren Bech-Hansen – Dalhousie University The Canadian federal-provincial system of government is recognized as one of the most unique in the world. While the founding fathers originally envisaged a relatively centralized system of government, reflecting their desire for a powerful national authority, political realities soon deemed that a more decentralized form of government would prevail. Influenced by both domestic and international factors, the Canadian federal system evolved throughout the 20th century. Provincial governments increasingly asserted their rights to attain the jurisdictional powers necessary to achieve their goals, and demanded to be placed on a near-equal footing with the federal government.1 The process by which this unfolded was long, grueling and conflict-ridden, but was essential if Canada were to function in the face of intense regionalism. 2 The process reached in culmination in the Constitution Act of 1982, which enshrined the two-tier federal- provincial system. Seemingly forgotten as federal-provincial jurisdiction has evolved in Canada is the third level of government: municipalities. And despite their enduring existence in the Canadian political economy, municipal governments have historically been excluded from constitutional recognition, and have “never enjoyed the independence that one often connects to a level of government.”3 Indeed, while the federal and provincial governments relish in autonomous power, local governments have been subordinately constitutionalized as “creatures of the province”, and are fiercely limited under provincial authority. 4 Municipal subordination has become increasingly problematic in an era of globalization that has introduced new consumer demands that heavily burden local governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Pueblo West Overview of Home Rule Or Statutory City/Town 1. Colorado Constitution and State and County Control 2. Home Rule An
    Pueblo West Overview of Home rule or Statutory City/Town 1. Colorado Constitution and State and County Control 2. Home Rule And Statutory Authority - 3. Taxation and Cost 4. Services and Operations 5. Communication to Citizens Colorado Colorado Constitution: State, County, and Local Control Authority Colorado Constitution Article XX Powers • Structural – power to choose the form State Government of government, charter and enact charter revisions, Dillon's Rule is the State’s authority to determine the bounds of a municipal government's legal authority Dillon’s Rule was Colorado law everywhere until a 1902 • Functional – power to exercise local constitutional amendment granted a degree of independence to Denver and offered it to other cities. Amendments self government in a broad or limited expanded its scope and made it available to all municipal manner, governments. Home Rule In Article XX of the Colorado Constitution, home rule gives local municipalities the power to make • Fiscal – authority to determine revenue legislation relevant to their areas, exercising control over issues of “local sources, set tax rates, borrow funds and concern” while minimizing state Statutory City intervention in municipal affairs. other related financial activities, or Town According to the Colorado Municipal • Services – authority to create and League, statutory cities and towns are provide public services and manage limited to exercising powers that are granted by the state and are subject to employment contracts for providing provisions and limitations imposed by those services. Special the state. Local Government District Autonomy Special Districts and Statutory Cities/Towns Incorporation are limited to exercising powers granted by the state and are subject to provisions and limitations imposed by the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Model-City-District-Regulations.Pdf
    Approved Mayor Agenda Item No. Veto __________ Override __________ ORDINANCE NO. ______________ ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND OTHER LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE MODEL CITY URBAN CENTER DISTRICT; CREATING SECTIONS 33-284.99.40 THROUGH 33-284.99.46 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY (CODE); AMENDING SECTION 33C-7 OF THE CODE; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA: Section 1. Section 33-284.99.40 of the Code of Miami-Dade County, Florida, is hereby created as follows: ARTICLE XXXIII (R) MODEL CITY URBAN CENTER DISTRICT (MCUCD) Sec. 33-284.99.40. Purpose, intent and applicability. A. The regulations contained in this chapter and Chapter 18A, Landscape Code, Code of Miami-Dade County, Florida, shall apply to this article, except as otherwise added to or modified herein. B. The Illustrative Master Plan (Figure 1) illustrates the citizens’ vision and may be used to interpret this article. Where the Illustrative Master Plan conflicts with the provisions of this article, the provisions of this article shall govern. C. Figure 1 also shows the boundaries of the Model City Urban Center District (MCUCD), as well as the boundaries of the Designated Urban Center. The MCUCD’s Designated Urban Center shall consist of the areas designated as being the Core and Center Sub-districts on the Sub-districts Plan in Sec. 33- 284-99.43 of this code. As provided in Standard Urban Center District Regulations, the Workforce Housing requirement shall Agenda Item No.
    [Show full text]