DOCSLIB.ORG

Terms and Concepts for Yield, Crop Loss, and Disease Thresholds Forrest W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terms and Concepts for Yield, Crop Loss, and Disease Thresholds Forrest W Plant Pathology and Microbiology Publications Plant Pathology and Microbiology 2-1993 Terms and Concepts for Yield, Crop Loss, and Disease Thresholds Forrest W. Nutter Jr. Iowa State University, [email protected] Paul S. Teng International Rice Research Institute Matthew H. Royer United States Department of Agriculture Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/plantpath_pubs Part of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, and the Plant Pathology Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ plantpath_pubs/63. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Plant Pathology and Microbiology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Plant Pathology and Microbiology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Terms and Concepts for Yield, Crop Loss, and Disease Thresholds Abstract The initial report (14) of a subcommittee of the APS Plant Disease Losses Committee dealt with terms and concepts relating to the measurement of disease intensity to obtain accurate and precise quantitative information on the relationship between disease intensity (stimulus = X) and yield or yield loss (response = Y). In addition to standardizing the terms and concepts for the measurement of disease intensity, members of the full committee identified a need to clarify and standardize terms and concepts pertaining to yield, crop loss, and disease thresholds. A second subcommittee was formed to accomplish this task. This report describes concepts concerning reference points for yield and crop loss as well as a hierarchy for threshold terms, then presents a list of terms and definitions to standardize terminology for crop loss assessment. Disciplines Agricultural Science | Agriculture | Plant Pathology Comments This article is from Plant Disease 77 (1993): 211, doi:10.1094/PD-77-211. Rights Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The onc tent of this document is not copyrighted. This article is available at Iowa State University Digital Repository: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/plantpath_pubs/63 Special Topic Terms and Concepts for Yield, Crop Loss, and Disease Thresholds FORREST W. NUTTER, JR., Associate Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, 351 Bessey Hall, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; PAUL S. TENG, Coordinator for PPM, International Rice Research Institute, Box 933, Manila, Philippines; and MATTHEW H. ROYER, Chief Operations Officer, Biological Assessment and Taxonomic Support, APHIS-PPQ-OS, USDA, 6505 Belcrest Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782 The initial report (14) of a subcom­ need (Fig. 1). "Maximum attainable the production level achieved when mittee of the APS Plant Disease Losses yield" is the theoretical yield that could producers utilize pest management pro­ Committee dealt with terms and concepts be achieved if the crop was grown under grams currently recommended for a crop relating to the measurement of disease optimum environmental conditions, or cropping system, yet several factors intensity to obtain accurate and precise along with the use of all available crop (environment, weeds, diseases, insects) quantitative information on the relation­ protection tactics to also alleviate the are still limiting yield. The difference be­ ship between disease intensity (stimulus effects of biotic pests. Genetic yield tween actual and attainable yield is the = X) and yield or yield loss (response potential-not biotic pests or environ­ method used by the Food and Agricul­ = Y). In addition to standardizing the ment-is the primary factor that limits ture Organization (FAO) to report crop terms and concepts for the measurement the maximum attainable yield. "Attain­ losses (4). Most, if not all, pest manage­ of disease intensity, members of the full able yield" is the yield obtained at a ment practices are aimed at closing the committee identified a need to clarify and specific location when all available crop gap between actual and attainable yield. standardize terms and concepts pertain­ protection tactics are used to alleviate In a PLANT DisEASE editorial, Cook (5) ing to yield, crop loss, and disease thresh­ the stresses caused by biotic pests. Thus, eloquently argued against the use of the olds. A second subcommittee was formed attainable yield is site-specific and is the term "crop loss." He described a situation to accomplish this task. This report yield obtained when biotic pests are in which a grower achieved a yield of describes concepts concerning reference alleviated but environmental (abiotic) 90 buf acre (grower yield), while replicate points for yield and crop loss as well as factors such as soil fertility, water avail­ plots in the same field fumigated with a hierarchy for threshold terms, then ability, growing degree days, etc., may Telone C to eliminate Pythium spp. and presents a list of terms and definitions still be limiting yield. Attainable yields parasitic nematodes yielded 128 bu/ acre to standardize terminology for crop loss are commonly achieved in well-managed (attainable yield). By FAO's definition, assessment. experimental plots. this difference in yield is an estimate of The cost of deploying all available pest crop loss and represents measurable con­ Reference Points for Assessing management tactics to achieve attainable straints to production. This estimate of Yield and Crop Loss yield may be higher than the return loss corresponds to the as yet unavoid­ Estimates of loss are a prerequisite to expected from the sale of the crop and/ able losses caused by plant pests and the rational development of any agricul­ or may harm the environment because pathogens. If these constraints were tural research program that has plant of excessive inputs. In contrast, "eco­ alleviated, the plant genotypes would protection as a component (1,6,9,17,20, nomic yield" is the achievable yield that realize yields closer to attainable levels. 23). Reliable estimates of loss facilitate provides the highest net return on Thus, "crop loss" is a function of one the objective identification of the relative expenditure. If the cost of utilizing a new or more biotic factors, each of which may importance of biotic pests (2,3,7,10,15). disease management technology exceeds be contributing to a reduction in yield, Consequently, limited resources (federal, the expected return, the technology is not whereas "yield loss" is the reduction in state, or private) can be assigned on a likely to be adopted. "Actual yield" is yield caused by a single pathogen or pest. priority basis to optimize returns from a given effort. Accurate information con­ cerning losses is also needed by growers -----~Maximum Attainable and plant protection specialists to develop Yield decision thresholds for determining when cost-effective control measures should be deployed (7,14,22). The need for reliable ------Attainable Yield crop loss assessment methodology (to develop reliable decision aids) assumes Factor A added importance given the current Factor B worldwide concern about improving or Crop Loss maintaining environmental quality by 1 Factor C reducing the use of pesticides (18). Economic Yield Factor D Several reference points for yield must be characterized before plant protection programs can be prioritized according to ------Actual Yield Journal Paper No. J-14955 of the Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames. Project No. 3116. Accepted for publication 9 September 1992. ------~Primitive Yield © 1993 The American Phytopathological Society Fig. 1. Reference points for crop loss assessment. Plant Disease/February 1993 211 "Primitive yield" is the yield achieved In addition to injury, damage must in monetary terms if the crop is to be when no disease or pest control tactics also be measured quantitatively if we are sold. Before monetary loss can be esti­ are utilized. The difference between to establish quantitative relationships mated, the amount of damage must be primitive yield and actual yield repre­ between injury (X) and damage ( Y). For multiplied by a price factor. Because the sents improvements in crop protection example, the yield or yield loss response prices of commodities are variable, the presently achieved by the deployment of (damage) may be measured as a reduc­ expected price may be used in calcula­ accepted pest management practices. For tion in volume per unit area harvested tions or a risk-rated system can be used example, in the southeastern United (bu/ acre = L3 I L2), by a reduction in in which probabilities are assigned worst­ States, peanuts grown in the absence of mass per unit area harvested (kgfha = case and best-case price scenarios. For any fungicide commonly yield 40-70% N/L2), and/or by changes in quality, example, a "median" rating is assigned less than peanuts managed with fungi­ such as increased protein content in to the midpoint of prices 'that divides all cides to control foliar diseases. The use barley (% protein = N IN X 100) or possible outcomes. One-half of all pos­ of fungicides has helped to increase the reduced oil content in soybeans (% oil sible outcomes should fall below the actual yield realized by growers, thereby = N / N X 100). The development and median value and one-half should
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture: Good Practice Examples
    SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Reza Ardakanian, Editors SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Reza Ardakanian, Editors PREFACE Population growth, rapid urbanisation, more water intense consumption patterns and climate change are intensifying the pressure on freshwater resources. The increasing scarcity of water, combined with other factors such as energy and fertilizers, is driving millions of farmers and other entrepreneurs to make use of wastewater. Wastewater reuse is an excellent example that naturally explains the importance of integrated management of water, soil and waste, which we define as the Nexus While the information in this book are generally believed to be true and accurate at the approach. The process begins in the waste sector, but the selection of date of publication, the editors and the publisher cannot accept any legal responsibility for the correct management model can make it relevant and important to any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, expressed or the water and soil as well. Over 20 million hectares of land are currently implied, with respect to the material contained herein. known to be irrigated with wastewater. This is interesting, but the The opinions expressed in this book are those of the Case Authors. Their inclusion in this alarming fact is that a greater percentage of this practice is not based book does not imply endorsement by the United Nations University. on any scientific criterion that ensures the “safe use” of wastewater. In order to address the technical, institutional, and policy challenges of safe water reuse, developing countries and countries in transition need clear institutional arrangements and more skilled human resources, United Nations University Institute for Integrated with a sound understanding of the opportunities and potential risks of Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources wastewater use.
    [Show full text]
  • PHOTOSYNTHESIS • Life on Earth Ultimately Depends on Energy Derived from the Sun
    Garden of Earthly Delights or Paradise Lost? [email protected] Old Byzantine Proverb: ‘He who has bread may have troubles He who lacks it has only one’ Peter Bruegel the Elder: The Harvest (1565) (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. USA) PHOTOSYNTHESIS • Life on earth ultimately depends on energy derived from the sun. • Photosynthesis by green plants is the only process of Sucrose biological importance that can capture this energy. Starch Proteins • It provides energy, organic matter and Oils oxygen, and is the only sustainble energy source on our planet. WE DEPEND TOTALLY ON PLANTS TO SUSTAIN ALL OTHER LIFE FORMS 1 Agriculture the most important event in human history Agriculture critical to the future of our planet and humanity Agriculture is part of the knowledge based bio-economy of the 21st century Each Year the World’s Population will Grow by about ca. 75 Million People. The world population has doubled in the last 50 years 2008 Developing countries 1960 10% of the Population Lives 1927 on 0.5% of the World’s Income Developed countries 2 Four innovations brought about change in agriculture in the twentieth century.What are the innovations which will change agriculture in this century? Mechanisation: Tractors freed up perhaps 25 % of extra land to grow human food instead of fodder for draught horses and oxen; • Fertilisers: Fritz Haber’s 1913 invention of a method of synthesising ammonia transformed agricultural productivity, so that today nearly half the nitrogen atoms in your body were ‘fixed’ from the air in an ammonia factory, not in a soil bacterium; • Pesticides: Chemicals derived from hydrocarbons enabled farmers to grow high-density crops year after year without severe loss to pests and weeds; • Genetics: In the 1950s Norman Borlaug crossed a variety of dwarf wheat, originally from Japan, with a different Mexican strain to make dwarf wheats that responded to heavy fertilisation by producing more seeds, not longer stalks.
    [Show full text]
  • Dakota Olson Hometown
    Evaluating the Effect of Management Practices on Soil Moisture, Aggregation and Crop Development By: Dakota Olson Hometown: Keswick, IA The World Food Prize Foundation 2014 Borlaug-Ruan International Internship Research Center: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) Location: El Batan, Mexico P a g e | 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………..3 Background Information………………………………………………………………………..4 CIMMYT Research Institute The Dr. Borlaug Legacy (in relation to CIMMYT) Discuss the long-term project of CIMMYT (1999-2014) Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………5 Introduction to Field Management Practices Objectives Conservation Agriculture Program Procedures and Methodology………………………………………………………………….6 The Field Plot Technical Skills o Yield Calculations o Time to Pond Measurements o Calculating Volumetric Water Content Results……………………………………………………………………………………………8 Objective 1: Effect of Tillage Method and Crop Residue on Soil Moisture Objective 2: Effect of Tillage Method and Crop Residue on Crop Yield Objective 3: Relationship between Time to Pond and Crop Yield Analysis of Results…………………………………………………………………………….11 Discussion, Conclusion, and Recommendations…………………………………………..15 Personal Experiences…………………………………………………………………………17 Pictures…………………………………………………………………………………………20 References and Citations…………………………………………………………………….21 P a g e | 3 Preface and Acknowledgements My success at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) would not be possible without the multitude of supporters that allowed me to pursue this incredible opportunity. A massive thank-you to the World Food Prize Organization and the staff and supporters that supply hundreds of youth and adults across the world with empowerment and opportunities to play as a stake-holder in international development issues. A big thank- you to Lisa Fleming of the World Food Prize Foundation for playing an integral role in the success of my international internship while in Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Winter Wheat Yield in Germany
    1 Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Winter Wheat Yield in Germany Amit Kumar Srivastava Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 5, D-53115, Bonn, Germany. Tel: +49 228-73-2881; Email: [email protected] Nima Safaei* Department of Business Analytics, Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States. Tel: +1 515 715 3804; Email: [email protected] Saeed Khaki* Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States. Tel:+1 5157080815; Email: [email protected] Gina Lopez Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 5, D-53115, Bonn, Germany. Tel: +49 228-73-2870; Email: [email protected] Wenzhi Zeng State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China; Tel: +86 18571630103; Email: [email protected] Frank Ewert Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 5, D-53115, Bonn, Germany. Email: [email protected] Thomas Gaiser Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 5, D-53115, Bonn, Germany. Tel: +49 228-73-2050; Email: [email protected] Jaber Rahimi Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Germany; Email: [email protected] *These authors have made equal contribution to the paper. Abstract This study analyzed the performance of different machine learning methods for winter wheat yield prediction using extensive datasets of weather, soil, and crop phenology. To address the seasonality, weekly features were used that explicitly take soil moisture conditions and meteorological events into account.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Yields, Farmland, and Irrigated Agriculture
    Long-Term Trajectories: Crop Yields, Farmland, and Irrigated Agriculture By Kenneth G. Cassman he specter of global food insecurity, in terms of capacity to meet food demand, will not be determined by water supply or even Tclimate change but rather by inadequate and misdirected invest- ments in research and development to support the required increases in crop yields. The magnitude of this food security challenge is further aug- mented by the need to concomitantly accelerate the growth rate in crop yields well above historical rates of the past 50 years during the so-called green revolution, and at the same time, substantially reduce negative en- vironmental effects from modern, science-based, high-yield agriculture. While this perspective may seem pessimistic, it also points the way toward solutions that lead to sustainable food and environmental se- curity. Identifying the most promising solutions requires a robust as- sessment of crop yield trajectories, food production capacity at local to global scales, the role of irrigated agriculture, and water use efficiency. I. Magnitude of the Challenge Much has been written about food demand in coming decades: many authors project increases in demand of 50 to 100 percent by 2050 for major food crops (for example, Bruinsma; Tilman and others). The preferred scenario to meet this demand would require minimal conver- sion of natural ecosystems to farmland, which avoids both loss of natural Kenneth G. Cassman is an emeritus professor of agronomy at the University of Nebraska- Lincoln. This article is on the bank’s website at www.KansasCityFed.org 21 22 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF KANSAS CITY habitat for wildlife and biodiversity and large quantities of greenhouse gas emissions associated with land clearing (Royal Society of London; Burney and others; Vermuelen and others).
    [Show full text]
  • Future Crop Yield Projections Using a Multi-Model Set of Regional Climate Models and a Plausible Adaptation Practice in the Southeast United States
    atmosphere Article Future Crop Yield Projections Using a Multi-model Set of Regional Climate Models and a Plausible Adaptation Practice in the Southeast United States D. W. Shin 1, Steven Cocke 1, Guillermo A. Baigorria 2, Consuelo C. Romero 2, Baek-Min Kim 3 and Ki-Young Kim 4,* 1 Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2840, USA; [email protected] (D.W.S.); [email protected] (S.C.) 2 Next Season Systems LLC, Lincoln, NE 68506, USA; [email protected] (G.A.B.); [email protected] (C.C.R.) 3 Department of Environmental Atmospheric Sciences, Pukyung National University, Busan 48513, Korea; [email protected] 4 4D Solution Co. Ltd., Seoul 08511, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-878-0126 Received: 28 October 2020; Accepted: 27 November 2020; Published: 30 November 2020 Abstract: Since maize, peanut, and cotton are economically valuable crops in the southeast United States, their yield amount changes in a future climate are attention-grabbing statistics demanded by associated stakeholders and policymakers. The Crop System Modeling—Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (CSM-DSSAT) models of maize, peanut, and cotton are, respectively, driven by the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) Phase II regional climate models to estimate current (1971–2000) and future (2041–2070) crop yield amounts. In particular, the future weather/climate data are based on the Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES) A2 emissions scenario. The NARCCAP realizations show on average that there will be large temperature increases (~2.7 C) and minor rainfall decreases (~ 0.10 mm/day) with pattern shifts ◦ − in the southeast United States.
    [Show full text]
  • High Yields, High Profits, and High Soil Fertility
    High Yields, High Profits, and High Soil Fertility By B.C. Darst and P.E. Fixen onsider the fact that by the year 2025 in an economic squeeze, and answers don’t the per capita land base for world food come easy. Cproduction will be less than half what it A recent headline in the Southwest Farm was in 1965 (Table 1)...the result of more Press read “Good yields take the sting out of than a doubling of population, while land in low prices.” The headline emphasizes the crop production increases only slightly. impact low commodity prices are having on Imagine a highway of the farm economy. Input costs cereal grains circling the “Use more and better continue to rise while prices Earth at the equator. It is 8.3 machinery, plant the best farmers receive sometimes feet thick and 66 feet wide. It seeds...cultivate effectively, resemble those of the 1970s. represents the amount of pro- and apply the kind and What can be done to ease the duction required to feed the amount of commercial fertil- effects of the current econom- world population for one year. izer that will produce the ic downturn? Should farmers Further, it must be complete- highest yields to reduce cut costs, turn on the cruise ly reproduced each year and costs per unit...” control, and let yields fall another 650 miles added... Southern Cultivator, where they may? Such a man- just to feed the additional 1870 agement philosophy doesn’t humans born that year. make sense, even in the These are tough times for agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Prediction of Crop Yields for Agricultural Policy Purposes Richard Kidd Perrin Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1968 Analysis and prediction of crop yields for agricultural policy purposes Richard Kidd Perrin Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons, and the Agricultural Economics Commons Recommended Citation Perrin, Richard Kidd, "Analysis and prediction of crop yields for agricultural policy purposes" (1968). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 3689. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/3689 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microiihned exactly as received 6 8-14,814 PEKRIN, Bichard Kidd, 1937- ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF CROP YIELDS FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY PURPOSES. Iowa State University, Pb.D., 1968 Economics, agricultural University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan ANALYSIS #D PREDICTION CE CROP YIELDS FOR AGRICUIiTURÂI. POLICY PURPOSES by Richard Kidd Perrin A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR CF HIILOSOHIY Major Subject; Agricultural Economics Approved Signature was redacted for privacy. Ina ChareeCharge of MaiorMajor Work Signature was redacted for privacy. Head of Major Department Signature was redacted for privacy. Dean Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa 1968 ii TABLE CP cmTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTim AND OBJECTIVES I II.
    [Show full text]
  • Balanced Fertiliser Use Increases Crop Yield and Profit (India)
    India Balanced Fertiliser Use Increases Research Notes China: Balanced Fertilization for Crop Yield and Profit Sustained Yield and Quality of Tea A survey of Chinese tea gardens revealed over half the sampled areas to be deficient in potassium (K). Deficiencies were concen- By G. Dev trated in the southern provinces of Guangdong, Guangxi and Yunnan, which had an average available K content of 80 mg/kg. Balanced fertilisation refers to the application of essential plant The northern regions appeared well managed, but only 16 percent nutrients in optimum quantities and proportions. Balanced nutrient of samples from Jiangsu, Anhui and Hubei had plant-available K supply is a best management practice (BMP) that should also levels greater than 150 mg/kg. The survey identified a close rela- include proper application methods and timing for the specific soil- tionship between K deficiency and low magnesium (Mg) availabil- crop-climate situation. This BMP ensures efficient use of all nutri- ity. Unbalanced fertilizer programs based on urea and other ammo- ents, maintenance of soil productivity, and conservation of precious nium-nitrogen (NH4-N) fertilizers promoted Mg uptake by tea and resources. aggravated leaching losses due to increased soil acidity. A 4-year field trial in southern China examined the effect of K The importance of balanced fertilisation is clearly visible from the and Mg fertilization on black, oolong and green tea yield and qual- large number of long-term experiments conducted on cropping Research is showing the ity. The combination of K and Mg created greater nutrient use effi- sequences throughout different agro-climatic zones in India (Tables 1 advantages of improved crop ciency and increased yields by 17 to 28 percent for green tea, 9 to and 2).
    [Show full text]
  • The Vertical Farm: a Review of Developments and Implications for the Vertical City
    buildings Review The Vertical Farm: A Review of Developments and Implications for the Vertical City Kheir Al-Kodmany Department of Urban Planning and Policy, College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA; [email protected] Received: 10 January 2018; Accepted: 1 February 2018; Published: 5 February 2018 Abstract: This paper discusses the emerging need for vertical farms by examining issues related to food security, urban population growth, farmland shortages, “food miles”, and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Urban planners and agricultural leaders have argued that cities will need to produce food internally to respond to demand by increasing population and to avoid paralyzing congestion, harmful pollution, and unaffordable food prices. The paper examines urban agriculture as a solution to these problems by merging food production and consumption in one place, with the vertical farm being suitable for urban areas where available land is limited and expensive. Luckily, recent advances in greenhouse technologies such as hydroponics, aeroponics, and aquaponics have provided a promising future to the vertical farm concept. These high-tech systems represent a paradigm shift in farming and food production and offer suitable and efficient methods for city farming by minimizing maintenance and maximizing yield. Upon reviewing these technologies and examining project prototypes, we find that these efforts may plant the seeds for the realization of the vertical farm. The paper, however, closes by speculating about the consequences, advantages, and disadvantages of the vertical farm’s implementation. Economic feasibility, codes, regulations, and a lack of expertise remain major obstacles in the path to implementing the vertical farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Fertilizer Use, Crop Yield, and Expected Production Riddle, Martinez, Gutierrez
    Fertilizer Use, Crop Yield, and Expected Production Riddle, Martinez, Gutierrez Fertilizer Use, Crop Yield, and Expected Production Spring Riddle, Paul Martinez, Victor Gutierrez Grade 10/10 Abstract The rapidly growing population and required future food supply is a concern to be addressed now. Understanding which fertilizers can produce the maximum value is an important factor in addressing this issue. This study is a statistical analysis of varying fertilizer applications for a conventional corn crop and the resulting crop yields. Four types of fertilizers are examined; Urea, NPK, NPK/Urea combination and Ammonium-sulfate/Urea combination. Data was gathered from the Russell Ranch Sustainable agriculture farm in Davis, California. The range of data is from 1994 to 2007 and includes 49 crop yields. We predict that the NPK/Urea combination fertilizer will produce the largest average crop yield. An expected benefit value equation is used to determine which fertilizer application on conventional corn crop produces the largest crop yield. The analysis results in NPK/Urea combination fertilizer producing the largest expected production or benefit value. The results contribute to the factors of production for greater crop yields. However, this is not the only factor to be considered when addressing future food demand. Alternate studies are needed in the areas of population growth, economic sustainability, agricultural sustainability and water management to produce a complete picture of future needs. Complications of our study include a limited amount of data. In order to yield the best analysis a greater database is needed in the area of fertilizer use and crop production. Introduction The human population is increasing exponentially which indicates that there is going to be higher demand for food and resources that are needed for human basic needs (www.worldback.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Agriculture and Its Implementation Gap—Overcoming Obstacles to Implementation
    sustainability Article Sustainable Agriculture and Its Implementation Gap—Overcoming Obstacles to Implementation Norman Siebrecht TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany; [email protected] Received: 12 February 2020; Accepted: 6 May 2020; Published: 8 May 2020 Abstract: There are numerous studies and publications about sustainable agriculture. Many papers argue that sustainable agriculture is necessary, and analyze how this goal could be achieved. At the same time, studies question the sustainability of agriculture. Several obstacles, including theoretical, methodological, personal, and practical issues, hinder or slow down implementation, resulting in the so-called implementation gap. This study addresses potential obstacles that limit the implementation of sustainable agriculture in practice. To overcome the obstacles and to improve implementation, different solutions and actions are required. This study aims to illustrate ways of minimizing or removing obstacles and how to overcome the implementation gap. Unfortunately, the diversity of obstacles and their complexity mean there are no quick and easy solutions. A broader approach that addresses different dimensions and stakeholders is required. Areas of action include institutionalization, assessment and system development, education and capacity building, and social and political support. To realize the suggestions and recommendations and to improve implementation, transdisciplinary work and cooperation between many actors are required. Keywords: sustainable agriculture; implementation; obstacles; barriers; practice; farm-scale; knowledge-to-action gap; extension service; agricultural policy; behavior 1. Introduction Sustainable development has been a guiding principle for all economic and political sectors since the UN Conference on Environment and Development in Rio in 1992. There is also broad consensus that it is an essential goal for agriculture, and sustainable agriculture is seen as essential for global sustainable development [1].
    [Show full text]