Zika Virus SCACM Audioconference January 24, 2017 PACE #: 362-001

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zika Virus SCACM Audioconference January 24, 2017 PACE #: 362-001 A Review of Emerging and Re- Emerging Zoonotic Viruses of the 21st Century Ryan F. Relich, PhD, D(ABMM), MLS(ASCP)SM Assistant Professor, Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Section Director, Clinical Microbiology and Serology (Eskenazi Health) Section Director, Clinical Virology Laboratory (IU Health) Medical Director, Special Pathogens Unit Laboratory (IU Health) Associate Medical Director, Division of Clinical Microbiology (IU Health) Associate Medical Director, Division of Molecular Pathology (IU Health) Indianapolis, IN USA Disclosures and disclaimers • Research funding/support • Abbott, BD Diagnostics, Beckman Coulter, Cepheid, Luminex Corporation, Roche, Sekisui, STAT-Diagnostica • Travel support by First Coast ID/CM Symposium • PASCV sponsorship Objectives • At the end of this presentation, audience members will be able to: • Describe the basic biology, ecology, and epidemiology of the viruses discussed; • Identify factors associated with the emergence or re- emergence of zoonotic viruses; and, • List clinical features of diseases caused by several zoonotic viruses, as well as their detection, treatment, and prevention. Outline • What are emerging zoonotic viruses and where do they come from? • Overview / introduction to selected viruses • Role of applied and basic research in detecting and controlling these agents • Summary What are emerging pathogens? • “Infectious diseases whose incidence has increased in the past 20 years and could increase in the future.” • Caused by • Newly recognized pathogens • Old foes recurring in known endemic areas and/or new endemic areas Where do they come from? • The majority spill over from animals • Zoonotic infections 6 Where do they come from? • Many are transmitted directly from animal reservoirs to humans or to humans through one or more other animals (e.g., pigs, dogs, camels, ticks, etc.) • Others are maintained by arthropod-human-arthropod transmission 7 Why do they spill over? • Anthropogenic drivers • Encroachment into natural habitats • Introduction of viruses (and other microorganisms) into new geographic locations • Agricultural practices • Anthropogenic climate change 8 Why do they spill over? • Non-anthropogenic drivers • Movement of infected reservoirs and vectors into new areas • People can have a hand in this, too! • Adaptation of viruses to new vectors and other hosts 9 Arthropod-borne viruses • Arboviruses • These viruses persist in nature by • Cycling between competent arthropod vectors and other animals (e.g., NHPs, sloths, rodents, etc.) • Transovarial transmission (from dams to offspring) • After introduction into human populations, some establish vector-human-vector cycles 10 Arthropod-borne viruses • Mosquito-borne viruses • Dengue virus • Genus, Flavivirus; family, Flaviviridae • Non-segmented, (+)ssRNA • Enveloped particles • 5 serotypes • Dengue 1 – 5 ViralZone 11 Arthropod-borne viruses • Mosquito-borne viruses • Dengue virus • Causes dengue fever or “breakbone fever” • Febrile illness that can sometimes lead to severe disease and death • Dengue shock syndrome and hemorrhagic fever • Infection with one serotype does NOT protect you against infection with others 12 Arthropod-borne viruses • Mosquito-borne viruses • Dengue virus • Perhaps the most widely distributed arbovirus on the planet; several thousand deaths per year CDC Arthropod-borne viruses • Mosquito-borne viruses • Dengue virus • Vector: Aedes spp. (e.g., A. aegypti [L] and A. albopictus [R]) CDC CDC Arthropod-borne viruses • Mosquito-borne viruses • Chikungunya virus • Genus, Alphavirus; family, Togaviridae • Non-segmented, (+)ssRNA • Enveloped particles ViralZone Arthropod-borne viruses • Mosquito-borne viruses • Chikungunya virus • Found in both Eastern Hemisphere and Western Hemisphere • Arrived to Western Hemisphere in 2013 • Disease process • ~80% of those infected become symptomatic • Fever, joint pain, myalgia, rash • Post-infectious arthralgia can last for MONTHS Arthropod-borne viruses • Mosquito-borne viruses • Chikungunya virus • Same as for dengue virus CDC Arthropod-borne viruses • Tick-borne viruses • Bourbon virus • Genus, Thogotovirus; family, Orthomyxoviridae • Segmented, (-)ssRNA • Enveloped particles ViralZone Arthropod-borne viruses • Tick-borne viruses • Bourbon virus • To date, only a handful of reported human disease cases • Disease process • Unknown incubation period • Fever, malaise, maculopapular rash, polymyalgia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, ARDS, death • Leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated liver enzymes Arthropod-borne viruses • Tick-borne viruses • Bourbon virus • Vector: likely Amblyomma americanum (lone star tick) http://heartspring.net/deer_tick_identification.html http://www.cdc.gov/ticks/maps/lone_star_tick.html Arthropod-borne viruses • Tick-borne viruses • Heartland virus • Genus, Banyangvirus; family, Phenuiviridae • Segmented, (-)ssRNA • Enveloped particles ViralZone Arthropod-borne viruses • Tick-borne viruses • Heartland virus • To date, only a handful of reported human disease cases • Disease process • Fever, fatigue, decreased appetite, headache, nausea, diarrhea, myalgia, and arthralgia • Leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, mildly elevated liver enzymes • A few deaths associated with infection Arthropod-borne viruses • Tick-borne viruses • Heartland virus • Vector: Amblyomma americanum (lone star tick) CDC Bat-borne viruses • Bats comprise the second-largest order of mammals • Over 1,200 species (account for about 20% of known species) • Massiveness of bat diversity means that there’s also a great deal of virus diversity • Some have proven to be dangerous human pathogens • Many “fly” under the radar, as they are nonpathogenic to humans • Many pathogens have yet to make contact contact with people and other susceptible hosts 24 Bat-borne viruses • Bat-borne viruses can either directly or indirectly spill over to humans • Direct: rabies virus and other encephalitogenic lyssaviruses; filoviruses, henipaviruses, etc. • Indirect: rabies virus, filoviruses, henipaviruses, various coronaviruses, etc. 25 Bat-borne viruses • Coronaviruses • Genus, Betacoronavirus; family, Coronaviridae • Enveloped particles • Monopartite (+)ssRNA • Particles have distinct morphology ViralZone Bat-borne viruses • Coronaviruses • Etymology • Corona = Latin noun, “crown” Wikipedia Beth Fischer, NIAID RML Bat-borne viruses • Coronaviruses • Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV or “Merbecovirus”) • First recognized in 2012 • Isolated from a Saudi Arabian patient’s sputum patient had pneumonia and renal failure • Clusters of cases in other parts of the Middle East (e.g., Jordan, Qatar, UAE, Yemen, etc.) --> sporadic cases outside of Middle East • 2015: large outbreak in South Korea Bat-borne viruses • Coronaviruses • MERS-CoV Virology Down Under 2019 Novel Coronavirus • 2019-nCoV • A ”new” betacoronavirus distantly related to SARS-like CoVs emerged in late 2019 (Wuhan, China) May and Relich. 2020. Unpublished. 2019 Novel Coronavirus • 2019-nCoV • A ”new” betacoronavirus distantly related to SARS-like CoVs emerged in late 2019 (Wuhan, China) May and Relich. 2020. Unpublished. 2019 Novel Coronavirus • 2019-nCoV • Currently, >12,000 cases in China and beyond • As of Jan 31, 2020 - 26 countries reporting cases 2019 Novel Coronavirus CDC (from Jan 31, 2020) 2019 Novel Coronavirus • 2019-nCoV • Currently, >12,000 cases in China and beyond • As of Jan 31, 2020 - 26 countries reporting cases • 7 confirmed cases in the U.S. 2019 Novel Coronavirus CDC (from Jan 31, 2020) 2019 Novel Coronavirus • 2019-nCoV • Currently, ~12,000 cases in China and beyond • As of Jan 31, 2020 - 26 countries reporting cases • 6 confirmed cases in the U.S. • Approximately >250 deaths (China) • Person-to-person transmission is possible Bat-borne viruses • Filoviruses • Currently, 6 recognized genera • Non-segmented (-)ssRNA • Enveloped particles • Filamentous morphology ViralZone 37 Bat-borne viruses • Filoviruses • Cuevavirus (1 species) • Dianlovirus (1 virus) • Ebolavirus (6 species) • Marburgvirus (1 species) • Striavirus (1 virus) • Thamnovirus (1 virus) 38 Bat-borne viruses • Filoviruses • Naturally found in the Eastern Hemisphere • Europe, Africa, China, Philippines, elsewhere? • Reston virus, Ebola virus, and Marburg virus have all been exported to non-native countries • Human-pathogenic filoviruses often cause severe disease • Ebola virus disease (Ebola hemorrhagic fever) • Marburg virus disease Bat-borne viruses • Filoviruses • Some (potential) reservoirs • Schreiber’s long-fingered bat (Miniopterus schreiberi) – LIoviu cuevavirus • Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus egyptiacus) – Marburg virus • African and Asian fruit bats – a variety of ebolaviruses and Měnglà viruses Bat-borne viruses • Filoviruses Bat-borne viruses • Henipaviruses • Genus, Henipavirus; family, Paramyxoviridae • Non-segmented (-)ssRNA • Enveloped particles • So far, there are 5 named henipaviruses ViralZone 42 Bat-borne viruses • Henipaviruses • Cedar henipavirus • Ghanian bat henipavirus • Hendra henipavirus • Mojiang henipavirus • Nipah henipavirus 43 Bat-borne viruses • Henipaviruses • Hendra and Nipah viruses are found in Australia and Asia, respectively, and are reservoired by large fruit bats (flying foxes) • Pteropus spp. Pteropus lyeli (dukelanguage.com) Bat-borne viruses • Henipaviruses CDC Bat-borne viruses • Henipaviruses • Nipah virus • Causes respiratory and CNS disease in pigs and other animals • Humans have become infected by contact with infectious bat excrement
Recommended publications
  • Arizona Arboviral Handbook for Chikungunya, Dengue, and Zika Viruses
    ARIZONA ARBOVIRAL HANDBOOK FOR CHIKUNGUNYA, DENGUE, AND ZIKA VIRUSES 7/31/2017 Arizona Department of Health Services | P a g e 1 Arizona Arboviral Handbook for Chikungunya, Dengue, and Zika Viruses Arizona Arboviral Handbook for Chikungunya, Dengue, and Zika Viruses OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................. 4 I: CHIKUNGUNYA ..................................................................................................... 5 Chikungunya Ecology and Transmission ....................................... 6 Chikungunya Clinical Disease and Case Management ............... 7 Chikungunya Laboratory Testing .................................................. 8 Chikungunya Case Definitions ...................................................... 9 Chikungunya Case Classification Algorithm ............................... 11 II: DENGUE .............................................................................................................. 12 Dengue Ecology and Transmission .............................................. 14 Dengue Clinical Disease and Case Management ...................... 14 Dengue Laboratory Testing ......................................................... 17 Dengue Case Definitions ............................................................ 19 Dengue Case Classification Algorithm ....................................... 23 III: ZIKA ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uveal Involvement in Marburg Virus Disease B
    Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.61.4.265 on 1 April 1977. Downloaded from British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1977, 61, 265-266 Uveal involvement in Marburg virus disease B. S. KUMING AND N. KOKORIS From the Department of Ophthalmology, Johannesburg General Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand SUMMARY The first reported case of uveal involvement in Marburg virus disease is described. 'Ex Africa semper aliquid novi'. Two outbreaks of Marburg virus disease have been Rhodesia and had also been constantly at his documented. The first occurred in Marburg and bedside till his death. Lassa fever was suspected and Frankfurt, West Germany, in 1967 (Martini, 1969) she was given a unit of Lassa fever convalescent and the second in Johannesburg in 1975 (Gear, serum when she became desperately ill on the fifth 1975). This case report describes the third patient day. She also developed acute pancreatitis. Within in the Johannesburg outbreak, who developed an 52 hours she made a dramatic and uneventful anterior uveitis. The cause of the uveitis was proved recovery. Her illness mainly affected the haema- to be the Marburg virus by identiying it in a tissue topoietic, hepatic, and pancreatic systems. culture of her aqueous fluid. The subject of this report was a nurse who had helped to nurse patients 1 and 2. Nine days after the Case report death ofthe first patient she presented with lower back pain and high fever. She developed hepatitis, a mild Before describing the case history of the patient the disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome, events leading to her contracting the disease must successfully treated with heparin, and the classical be briefly described.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Orders and Emergency Declarations for the West Nile Virus: Applying Lessons from Past Outbreaks to Zika
    Executive Orders and Emergency Declarations for the West Nile Virus: Applying Lessons from Past Outbreaks to Zika Government leaders are often given the authority to issue executive orders (EOs), proclamations, or emergency declarations to address public health threats, such as that posed by the Zika virus.1 Local, state, and federal executive branch leaders have used these powers to address public health threats posed by other mosquito-borne diseases.2 While existing laws and regulations may allow localities, states, and the federal government to take action to combat mosquito-borne threats absent an EO or emergency declaration, examining such executive actions provides a snapshot of how some jurisdictions have responded to past outbreaks. As of February 21, 2016, only one territory and two states (Puerto Rico, Florida, and Hawaii) have issued emergency declarations that contemplate the threats posed by the Zika virus.3, 4 Historically, however, many US jurisdictions have taken such actions to address other mosquito-borne illnesses, such as West Nile virus. The following provides a brief analysis of select uses of local, state, and federal executive powers to combat West Nile virus. Examining the use of executive powers to address West 1 L Rutkow et al. The Public Health Workforce and Willingness to Respond to Emergencies: A 50-State Analysis of Potentially Influential Laws, 42 J. LAW MED. & ETHICS 64, 64 (2014) (“In the United States, at the federal, state, and local levels, laws provide an infrastructure for public health emergency preparedness and response efforts. Law is perhaps most visible during an emergency when the president or a state’s governor issues a disaster declaration establishing the temporal and geographic parameters for the response and making financial and other resources available.”).
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Zika Virus Isolate Significantly Changes the Transcriptional Profile
    viruses Article Asian Zika Virus Isolate Significantly Changes the Transcriptional Profile and Alternative RNA Splicing Events in a Neuroblastoma Cell Line Gaston Bonenfant 1,2, Ryan Meng 2, Carl Shotwell 2,3 , Pheonah Badu 1,2, Anne F. Payne 4, Alexander T. Ciota 4,5, Morgan A. Sammons 1, J. Andrew Berglund 1,2 and Cara T. Pager 1,2,* 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, NY 12222, USA; [email protected] (G.B.); [email protected] (P.B.); [email protected] (M.A.S.); [email protected] (J.A.B.) 2 The RNA Institute, University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, NY 12222, USA; [email protected] (R.M.); [email protected] (C.S.) 3 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA 4 Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH), Slingerlands, NY 12159, USA; [email protected] (A.F.P.); [email protected] (A.T.C.) 5 Department of Biomedical Sciences, University at Albany-SUNY, School of Public Health, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-518-591-8841 Received: 9 April 2020; Accepted: 27 April 2020; Published: 5 May 2020 Abstract: The alternative splicing of pre-mRNAs expands a single genetic blueprint to encode multiple, functionally diverse protein isoforms. Viruses have previously been shown to interact with, depend on, and alter host splicing machinery. The consequences, however, incited by viral infection on the global alternative slicing (AS) landscape are under-appreciated. Here, we investigated the transcriptional and alternative splicing profile of neuronal cells infected with a contemporary Puerto Rican Zika virus (ZIKVPR) isolate, an isolate of the prototypical Ugandan ZIKV (ZIKVMR), and dengue virus 2 (DENV2).
    [Show full text]
  • Heartland and Bourbon Virus Testing Guideance for Healthcare Providers
    Heartland and Bourbon Virus Testing Guidance for Healthcare Providers Heartland virus is an RNA virus believed to be transmitted by the Lone Star tick (Amblyomma americanum). Most patients reported tick exposure in the two weeks prior to illness onset. While no cases have been reported in Louisiana, this tick is found in Louisiana. First discovered as a cause of human illness in 2009 in Missouri, more than 40 cases have been reported from states in Midwestern and southern U.S. to date. Initial symptoms of Heartland virus disease are very similar to those of ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis, which include fever, fatigue, anorexia, nausea and diarrhea. Cases have also had leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and mild to moderate elevation of liver transaminases. Heartland virus disease should be considered in patients being treated for ehrlichiosis who do not respond to treatment with doxycycline. For several years, CDC has been working under IRB-approved protocols to identify additional cases and validate diagnostic test for several novel pathogens. Now the CDC Arboviral Diseases Branch offers routine diagnostic testing for Heartland and Bourbon viruses (RT-PCR, IgM and IgG MIA, PRNT). There is no commercial testing available. Treatment of Heartland virus disease is supportive only. Many patients diagnosed with the disease have required hospitalization. With supportive care, most people have fully recovered; however, a few older individuals with medical comorbidities have died. The best way to prevent Heartland virus infection is to avoid exposure
    [Show full text]
  • Ebola Virus Disease
    Outbreaks Chronology: Ebola Virus Disease Known Cases and Outbreaks of Ebola Virus Disease, in Reverse Chronological Order: Reported number (%) of Reported deaths Ebola number of among Year(s) Country subtype human cases cases Situation August- Democratic Ebola virus 66 49 (74%) Outbreak occurred in November 2014 Republic of multiple villages in the Congo the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The outbreak was unrelated to the outbreak of Ebola in West Africa. March 2014- Multiple Ebola virus 28652 11325 Outbreak across Present countries multiple countries in West Africa. Number of patients is constantly evolving due to the ongoing investigation. 32 November 2012- Uganda Sudan virus 6* 3* (50%) Outbreak occurred in January 2013 the Luwero District. CDC assisted the Ministry of Health in the epidemiologic and diagnostic aspects of the outbreak. Testing of samples by CDC's Viral Special Pathogens Branch occurred at UVRI in Entebbe. 31 June-November Democratic Bundibugyo 36* 13* (36.1%) Outbreak occurred in 2012 Republic of virus DRC’s Province the Congo Orientale. Laboratory support was provided through CDC and the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)’s field laboratory in Isiro, as well as through the CDC/UVRI lab in Uganda. The outbreak in DRC had no epidemiologic link to the near contemporaneous Ebola outbreak in the Kibaale district of Uganda. 31 June-October Uganda Sudan virus 11* 4* (36.4%) Outbreak occurred in 2012 the Kibaale District of Uganda. Laboratory tests of blood samples were conducted by the UVRI and the CDC. 31 May 2011 Uganda Sudan virus 1 1 (100%) The Uganda Ministry of Health informed the public a patient with suspected Ebola Hemorrhagic fever died on May 6, 2011 in the Luwero district, Uganda.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoonotic Diseases of Public Health Importance
    ZOONOTIC DISEASES OF PUBLIC HEALTH IMPORTANCE ZOONOSIS DIVISION NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES (DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HEALTH SERVICES) 22 – SHAM NATH MARG, DELHI – 110 054 2005 List of contributors: Dr. Shiv Lal, Addl. DG & Director Dr. Veena Mittal, Joint Director & HOD, Zoonosis Division Dr. Dipesh Bhattacharya, Joint Director, Zoonosis Division Dr. U.V.S. Rana, Joint Director, Zoonosis Division Dr. Mala Chhabra, Deputy Director, Zoonosis Division FOREWORD Several zoonotic diseases are major public health problems not only in India but also in different parts of the world. Some of them have been plaguing mankind from time immemorial and some have emerged as major problems in recent times. Diseases like plague, Japanese encephalitis, leishmaniasis, rabies, leptospirosis and dengue fever etc. have been major public health concerns in India and are considered important because of large human morbidity and mortality from these diseases. During 1994 India had an outbreak of plague in man in Surat (Gujarat) and Beed (Maharashtra) after a lapse of around 3 decades. Again after 8 years in 2002, an outbreak of pneumonic plague occurred in Himachal Pradesh followed by outbreak of bubonic plague in 2004 in Uttaranchal. Japanese encephalitis has emerged as a major problem in several states and every year several outbreaks of Japanese encephalitis are reported from different parts of the country. Resurgence of Kala-azar in mid seventies in Bihar, West Bengal and Jharkhand still continues to be a major public health concern. Efforts are being made to initiate kala-azar elimination programme by the year 2010. Rabies continues to be an important killer in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Dengue Fever and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (Dhf)
    DENGUE FEVER AND DENGUE HEMORRHAGIC FEVER (DHF) What are DENGUE and DHF? Dengue and DHF are viral diseases transmitted by mosquitoes in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Cases of dengue and DHF are confirmed every year in travelers returning to the United States after visits to regions such as the South Pacific, Asia, the Caribbean, the Americas and Africa. How is dengue fever spread? Dengue virus is transmitted to people by the bite of an infected mosquito. Dengue cannot be spread directly from person to person. What are the symptoms of dengue fever? The most common symptoms of dengue are high fever for 2–7 days, severe headache, backache, joint pains, nausea and vomiting, eye pain and rash. The rash is frequently not visible in dark-skinned people. Young children typically have a milder illness than older children and adults. Most patients report a non-specific flu-like illness. Many patients infected with dengue will not show any symptoms. DHF is a more severe form of dengue. Initial symptoms are the same as dengue but are followed by bleeding problems such as easy bruising, skin hemorrhages, bleeding from the nose or gums, and possible bleeding of the internal organs. DHF is very rare. How soon after exposure do symptoms appear? Symptoms of dengue can occur from 3-14 days, commonly 4-7 days, after the bite of an infected mosquito. What is the treatment for dengue fever? There is no specific treatment for dengue. Treatment usually involves treating symptoms such as managing fever, general aches and pains. Persons who have traveled to a tropical or sub-tropical region should consult their physician if they develop symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • As a Model of Human Ebola Virus Infection
    Viruses 2012, 4, 2400-2416; doi:10.3390/v4102400 OPEN ACCESS viruses ISSN 1999-4915 www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses Review The Baboon (Papio spp.) as a Model of Human Ebola Virus Infection Donna L. Perry 1,*, Laura Bollinger 1 and Gary L.White 2 1 Integrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, NIAID, NIH, Frederick, MD, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Baboon Research Resource, University of Oklahoma, Ft. Reno Science Park, OK, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-301-631-7249; Fax: +1-301-619-5029. Received: 8 October 2012; in revised form: 17 October 2012 / Accepted: 17 October 2012 / Published: 23 October 2012 Abstract: Baboons are susceptible to natural Ebola virus (EBOV) infection and share 96% genetic homology with humans. Despite these characteristics, baboons have rarely been utilized as experimental models of human EBOV infection to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactics and therapeutics in the United States. This review will summarize what is known about the pathogenesis of EBOV infection in baboons compared to EBOV infection in humans and other Old World nonhuman primates. In addition, we will discuss how closely the baboon model recapitulates human EBOV infection. We will also review some of the housing requirements and behavioral attributes of baboons compared to other Old World nonhuman primates. Due to the lack of data available on the pathogenesis of Marburg virus (MARV) infection in baboons, discussion of the pathogenesis of MARV infection in baboons will be limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Replication of Marburg Virus in Human Endothelial Cells a Possible Mechanism for the Development of Viral Hemorrhagic Disease
    Replication of Marburg Virus in Human Endothelial Cells A Possible Mechanism for the Development of Viral Hemorrhagic Disease Hans-Joachim Schnittler,$ Friederike Mahner, * Detlev Drenckhahn, * Hans-Dieter Klenk, * and Heinz Feldmann * *Institut fir Virologie, Philipps-Universitdt Marburg, 3550 Marburg, Germany; tInstitutftirAnatomie, Universitdt Wiirzburg, 8700 Wiirzburg, Germany Abstract Rhabdoviridae, within the new proposed order Mononegavi- Marburg and Ebola virus, members of the family Filoviridae, rales (10). Virions are composed of a helical nucleocapsid cause a severe hemorrhagic disease in humans and primates. surrounded by a lipid envelope. The genome is nonsegmented, The disease is characterized as a pantropic virus infection often of negative sense, and 19 kb in length (3, 11, 12). Virion parti- resulting in a fulminating shock associated with hemorrhage, cles contain at least seven structural proteins (8, 13-16). and death. All known histological and pathophysiological pa- Filovirus infections have several pathological features in rameters of the disease are not sufficient to explain the devas- common with other severe viral hemorrhagic fevers such as tating symptoms. Previous studies suggested a nonspecific de- Lassa fever, hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, and struction of the endothelium as a possible mechanism. Con- Dengue hemorrhagic fever (5). Among these viruses, filovi- cerning the important regulatory functions of the endothelium ruses cause the highest case-fatality rates ( - 35% for MBG [61 (blood pressure, antithrombogenicity, homeostasis), we exam- and up to 90% for EBO, subtype Zaire [17]) and the most ined Marburg virus replication in primary cultures of human severe hemorrhagic manifestations. The pathophysiologic endothelial cells and organ cultures of human umbilical cord events that make filovirus infections of humans so devastating veins.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison and Evaluation of Real-Time Taqman PCR for Detection and Quantification of Ebolavirus
    viruses Article Comparison and Evaluation of Real-Time Taqman PCR for Detection and Quantification of Ebolavirus Yi Huang 1,* , Shuqi Xiao 2 and Zhiming Yuan 1,* 1 National Biosafety Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430020, China 2 Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430020, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.H.); [email protected] (Z.Y.) Abstract: Given that ebolavirus causes severe and frequently lethal disease, its rapid and accurate detection using available and validated methods is essential for controlling infection. Real-time reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) has proven to be an invaluable tool for ebolaviruses diagnostics. Many assays with different targets have been developed, but they have not been externally compared or validated, and limits of detection are not uniformly reported. Here we compared and evaluated the sensitivity, reproducibility and specificity of 23 in-house assays under the same conditions. Our results showed that these assays were highly gene- and species- specific when evaluated using in vitro RNA transcripts and viral RNA, and the potential limits of detection were uniformly reported 2 6 ranging from 10 to 10 in vitro synthesized RNA transcripts copies perµL and 1–100 TCID50/mL. The comparison of these assays indicated that those targeting the more conservative NP gene could be the better option for EVD case definition and quantitative measurement because of its higher sensitivity for the same species. Our analysis could contribute to the standardization of ebolavirus detection and quantification assays, which can offer a better understanding of the meaning of results across laboratories and time points, as well as make them easy to implement, especially under outbreak conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Child Or Family Member May Have Dengue Fever According to Their Clinical History and Physical Examination
    Your child or family member may have dengue fever according to their clinical history and physical examination. If it is dengue, serious complications of the disease can develop. If the complications are recognized early, and a doctor is consulted, it may save the patient’s life. Your doctor can order more tests to see if the patient needs to be hospitalized. The doctor can also order specific tests for dengue, but those tests will take longer than a week for the results to come back. How to Care for the Patient While They Have a Fever: Bed rest. Let patient rest as much as possible. Control the fever. Give acetaminophen or paracetamol (Tylenol) every 6 hours (maximum 4 doses per day). Do not give ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil) aspirin, or aspirin containing drugs. Sponge patient’s skin with cool water if fever stays high. Prevent dehydration which occurs when a person loses too much fluid (from high fevers, vomiting, or poor oral intake). Give plenty of fluids and watch for signs of dehydration. Bring patient to clinic or emergency room if any of the following signs develop: Decrease in urination (check number of wet diapers or trips to the bathroom) Few or no tears when child cries Dry mouth, tongue or lips Sunken eyes Listlessness or overly agitated or confused Fast heart beat (more than 100/min) Cold or clammy fingers and toes Sunken fontanel in infant DO WHILE THE PATIENT HAS FEVER DO WHILE THE PATIENT Prevent spread of dengue within your house. Place patient under bed net or use insect repellent on the patient while they have a fever.
    [Show full text]