DOCSLIB.ORG

Health Effects Support Document for Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Health Effects Support Document for Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) United States Office of Water EPA 822-R-16-002 Environmental Protection Mail Code 4304T May 2016 Agency Health Effects Support Document for Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) –May 2016 i Health Effects Support Document for Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water (4304T) Health and Ecological Criteria Division Washington, DC 20460 http://www.epa.gov/dwstandardsregulations/drinking-water-contaminant-human-health-effects- information. EPA Document Number: 822-R-16-002 May 2016 Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) –May 2016 ii BACKGROUND The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), as amended in 1996, requires the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish a list of unregulated microbiological and chemical contaminants known or anticipated to occur in public water systems and that might require control in the future through national primary drinking water regulations. The SDWA also requires the Agency to make regulatory determinations on at least five contaminants on the Contaminant Candidate List (CCL) every 5 years. For each contaminant on the CCL, before EPA makes a regulatory determination, the Agency needs to obtain sufficient data to conduct analyses on the extent to which the contaminant occurs and the risk it poses to populations via drinking water. Ultimately, this information will assist the Agency in determining the most appropriate course of action in relation to the contaminant (e.g., developing a regulation to control it in drinking water, developing guidance, or deciding not to regulate it). The PFOS health assessment was initiated by the Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology in 2009. The draft Health Effects Support Document for Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Acid (PFOS) was completed in 2013 and released for public comment in February 2014. An external peer-review panel meeting was held on August 21 and 22, 2014. The final document reflects input from the panel as well as public comments received on the draft document. Both the peer-reviewed draft and this document include only the sections of a health effects support document (HESD) that cover the toxicokinetics and health effects of PFOS. If a decision is made to regulate the contaminant, this document will be expanded. One of the challenges inherent in conducting this assessment was the wealth of experimental data published before and during its development. This section provides a synopsis of the approach used in identifying and selecting the publications reflected in the final assessment. Data were identified through the following: Monthly/bimonthly literature searches conducted by EPA library staff (2009–2015) and New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection library staff (2012–2015). • Papers identified by EPA internal and external peer reviewers. • Papers identified through public comments on the draft assessments. • Papers submitted to EPA by the public. In mid-2013, the EPA library searches were expanded to cover other members of the perfluorocarboxylic acids (C-4 to C-12) and sulfonate families (C-4, C-6, C-8). Appendix A describes the literature search strategy used by the libraries. Through the literature search, documents were identified for retrieval, review, and inclusion in the HESD using the following criteria: • The study examines a toxicity endpoint or population not examined by studies already included in the draft document. • Aspects of the study design such as the size of the population exposed or quantification approach make it superior to key studies already included in the draft document. • The data contribute substantially to the weight of evidence for any of the toxicity endpoints covered by the draft document. • Elements of the study design merit its inclusion in the draft document based on its contribution to the mode of action or the quantification approach. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) –May 2016 iii • The study elucidates the mode of action for any toxicity endpoint or toxicokinetic property associated with PFOS exposure. • The effects observed differ from those in other studies with comparable protocols. In addition to each publication being evaluated against the criteria above, the relevance of the study to drinking water exposures and to the U.S. population also were considered. The studies included in the final draft were determined to provide the most current and comprehensive description of the toxicological properties of PFOS and the risk it poses to humans exposed to it in their drinking water. Appendix B summarizes the studies evaluated for inclusion in the HESD following the August 2014 peer review and identifies those selected for inclusion in the final assessment. Appendix B includes epidemiology data that provide a high- level summary of the outcomes across the studies evaluated. Development of the hazard identification and dose-response assessment for PFOS has followed the general guidelines for risk assessment forth by the National Research Council (1983) and EPA’s Framework for Human Health Risk Assessment to Inform Decision Making (USEPA 2014a). Other EPA guidelines used in the development of this assessment include the following: • Guidelines for the Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures (USEPA 1986a) • Guidelines for Mutagenicity Risk Assessment (USEPA 1986b) • Recommendations for and Documentation of Biological Values for Use in Risk Assessment (USEPA 1988) • Guidelines for Developmental Toxicity Risk Assessment (USEPA 1991) • Interim Policy for Particle Size and Limit Concentration Issues in Inhalation Toxicity Studies (USEPA 1994a) • Methods for Derivation of Inhalation Reference Concentrations and Application of Inhalation Dosimetry (USEPA 1994b) • Use of the Benchmark Dose Approach in Health Risk Assessment (USEPA 1995) • Guidelines for Reproductive Toxicity Risk Assessment (USEPA 1996) • Guidelines for Neurotoxicity Risk Assessment (USEPA 1998) • Science Policy Council Handbook: Peer Review (2nd edition) (USEPA 2000a) • Supplemental Guidance for Conducting Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures (USEPA 2000b) • A Review of the Reference Dose and Reference Concentration Processes (USEPA 2002) • Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment (USEPA 2005a) • Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Susceptibility from Early-Life Exposure to Carcinogens (USEPA 2005b) • Science Policy Council Handbook: Peer Review (USEPA 2006a) • A Framework for Assessing Health Risks of Environmental Exposures to Children (USEPA 2006b) • Highlights of the Exposure Factors Handbook (USEPA 2011) • Benchmark Dose Technical Guidance Document (USEPA 2012) • Child-Specific Exposure Scenarios Examples (USEPA 2014b) Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) –May 2016 iv AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS Joyce Morrissey Donohue, Ph.D. (Chemical Manager) Office of Water U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Amal Mahfouz, Ph.D. (Chemical Manager, pre-retirement). Office of Water U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Tina Moore Duke, M.S. (previously with Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) John Wambaugh, Ph.D. Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC The following contractor authors supported the development of this document: Dana F. Glass-Mattie, D.V.M. Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN Carol S. Wood, Ph.D., D.A.B.T. Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN This document was prepared under the U.S. EPA Contract No. DW-8992342701, Work Assignment No. 2011-001 with Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The Lead U.S. EPA Scientist is Joyce Morrissey Donohue, Ph.D., Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed and operated by UT-Battelle, LLC., for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725. CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS Internal Contributors and Reviewers Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Elizabeth Doyle, Ph.D. (retired) Edward Hackett Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Glinda Cooper, Ph.D. Barbara Glenn, Ph.D. Erin Hines, Ph.D. Christopher Lau, Ph.D. Matthew Lorber, Ph.D. Jaqueline Moya Linda Phillips, Ph.D. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) –May 2016 v Paul White, Ph.D. Michael Wright, Sc.D. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency E. Laurence Libelo Andrea Pfehales-Hutchens, Ph.D. Tracy Williamson David Lai, Ph.D. (retired) Jennifer Seed, Ph.D. (retired) Office of Children’s Health Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gregory Miller Office of Land and Emergency Management, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency External Reviewers James Bruckner, Ph.D. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Georgia, Athens, GA Deborah Cory-Slechta, Ph.D. Department of Environmental Medicine University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY Jamie DeWitt, Ph.D. Pharmacology and Toxicology East Carolina University, Greenville, NC Jeffrey Fisher, Ph.D. Biochemical Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AK William Hayton, Ph.D. College of Pharmacy (Emeritus) The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH Matthew Longnecker, M.D., Sc.D. Biomarker-based Epidemiology Group National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC Angela Slitt, Ph.D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chemicals in the Fourth Report and Updated Tables Pdf Icon[PDF
    Chemicals in the Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals: Updated Tables, March 2021 CDC’s Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals: Updated Tables, March 2021 provides exposure data on the following chemicals or classes of chemicals. The Updated Tables contain cumulative data from national samples collected beginning in 1999–2000 and as recently as 2015-2016. Not all chemicals were measured in each national sample. The data tables are available at https://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport. An asterisk (*) indicates the chemical has been added since publication of the Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals in 2009. Adducts of Hemoglobin Acrylamide Formaldehyde* Glycidamide Tobacco Alkaloids and Metabolites Anabasine* Anatabine* Cotinine Cotinine-n-oxide* Hydroxycotinine* Trans-3’-hydroxycotinine* 1-(3-Pyridyl)-1-butanol-4-carboxylic acid* Nicotine* Nicotine-N’-oxide* Nornicotine* Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines (TSNAs) N’-Nitrosoanabasine (NAB)* N’-Nitrosoanatabine (NAT)* N’-Nitrosonornicotine (NNN)* Total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol) (NNAL)* Volatile N-nitrosamines (VNAs) N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA)* N-Nitrosoethylmethylamine (NMEA)* N-Nitrosomorpholine (NMOR)* N-Nitrosopiperidine (NPIP)* N-Nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR)* Disinfection By-Products Bromodichloromethane Dibromochloromethane Tribromomethane (Bromoform) Trichloromethane (Chloroform) Personal Care and Consumer Product Chemicals and Metabolites Benzophenone-3 Bisphenol A Bisphenol F* Bisphenol
    [Show full text]
  • Pfoa) Or Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (Pfos
    National Toxicology Program NTP U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NTP Monograph Immunotoxicity Associated with Exposure to Perfluorooctanoic Acid or Perfluorooctane Sulfonate September 2016 NTP MONOGRAPH ON IMMUNOTOXICITY ASSOCIATED WITH EXPOSURE TO PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID (PFOA) OR PERFLUOROOCTANE SULFONATE (PFOS) September, 2016 Office of Health Assessment and Translation Division of the National Toxicology Program National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences National Institutes of Health U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Systematic Review of Immunotoxicity Associated with Exposure to PFOA or PFOS TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ...............................................................................................................................II List of Table and Figures ................................................................................................................... IV Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Peer Review Of The Draft NTP Monograph ......................................................................................... 2 Peer-Review Panel .............................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Objective and Specific Aims ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PFAS MCL Technical Support Document
    ATTACHMENT 1 New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Technical Background Report for the June 2019 Proposed Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) and Ambient Groundwater Quality Standards (AGQSs) for Perfluorooctane sulfonic Acid (PFOS), Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA), Perfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA), and Perfluorohexane sulfonic Acid (PFHxS) And Letter from Dr. Stephen M. Roberts, Ph.D. dated 6/25/2019 – Findings of Peer Review Conducted on Technical Background Report June 28, 2019 New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Technical Background Report for the June 2019 Proposed Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) and Ambient Groundwater Quality Standards (AGQSs) for Perfluorooctane sulfonic Acid (PFOS), Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA), Perfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA), and Perfluorohexane sulfonic Acid (PFHxS) June 28, 2019 Table of Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... iii Section I. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 Section II. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 Section III. Reference Dose Derivation ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Health Effects Support Document for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)
    United States Office of Water EPA 822-R-16-003 Environmental Protection Mail Code 4304T May 2016 Agency Health Effects Support Document for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Perfluorooctanoic Acid – May 2016 i Health Effects Support Document for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water (4304T) Health and Ecological Criteria Division Washington, DC 20460 EPA Document Number: 822-R-16-003 May 2016 Perfluorooctanoic Acid – May 2016 ii BACKGROUND The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), as amended in 1996, requires the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to periodically publish a list of unregulated chemical contaminants known or anticipated to occur in public water systems and that may require regulation under SDWA. The SDWA also requires the Agency to make regulatory determinations on at least five contaminants on the Contaminant Candidate List (CCL) every 5 years. For each contaminant on the CCL, before EPA makes a regulatory determination, the Agency needs to obtain sufficient data to conduct analyses on the extent to which the contaminant occurs and the risk it poses to populations via drinking water. Ultimately, this information will assist the Agency in determining the most appropriate course of action in relation to the contaminant (e.g., developing a regulation to control it in drinking water, developing guidance, or deciding not to regulate it). The PFOA health assessment was initiated by the Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology in 2009. The draft Health Effects Support Document for Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) was completed in 2013 and released for public comment in February 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) November 2017 TECHNICAL FACT SHEET – PFOS and PFOA
    Technical Fact Sheet – Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) November 2017 TECHNICAL FACT SHEET – PFOS and PFOA Introduction At a Glance This fact sheet, developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Manmade chemicals not (EPA) Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO), provides a naturally found in the summary of two contaminants of emerging concern, perfluorooctane environment. sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), including physical and Fluorinated compounds that chemical properties; environmental and health impacts; existing federal and repel oil and water. state guidelines; detection and treatment methods; and additional sources of information. This fact sheet is intended for use by site managers who may Used in a variety of industrial address these chemicals at cleanup sites or in drinking water supplies and and consumer products, such for those in a position to consider whether these chemicals should be added as carpet and clothing to the analytical suite for site investigations. treatments and firefighting foams. PFOS and PFOA are part of a larger group of chemicals called per- and Extremely persistent in the polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). PFASs, which are highly fluorinated environment. aliphatic molecules, have been released to the environment through Known to bioaccumulate in industrial manufacturing and through use and disposal of PFAS-containing humans and wildlife. products (Liu and Mejia Avendano 2013). PFOS and PFOA are the most Readily absorbed after oral widely studied of the PFAS chemicals. PFOS and PFOA are persistent in the exposure. Accumulate environment and resistant to typical environmental degradation processes. primarily in the blood serum, As a result, they are widely distributed across all trophic levels and are found kidney and liver.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiota and Obesogens: Environmental Regulators of Fat Storage
    Microbiota and obesogens: environmental regulators of fat storage John F. Rawls, Ph.D. Department of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology Center for Genomics of Microbial Systems Duke University School of Medicine Seminar outline 1. Introduction to the microbiota 2. Microbiota as environmental factors in obesity 3. Obesogens as environmental factors in obesity Seeing and understanding the unseen Antonie van Leewenhoek 1620’s: Described differences between microbes associated with teeth & feces during health & disease. Louis Pasteur 1850’s: Helps establish the “germ theory” of disease. 1885: Predicts that germ-free animals can not survive without “common microorganisms”. Culture-independent analysis of bacterial communities using 16S rRNA gene sequencing 16S rRNA 16S SSU rRNA 16S rRNA gene V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 Culture-independent analysis of bacterial communities using 16S rRNA gene sequencing plantbiology.siu.edu Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA genes revealed 3 domains and a vast unappreciated diversity of microbial life You are here Carl Woese Glossary • Microbiota / microflora: the microorganisms of a particular site, habitat, or period of time. • Microbiome: the collective genomes of the microorganisms within a microbiota. • Germ-free / axenic: of a culture that is free from living organisms other than the host species. • Gnotobiotic: of an environment for rearing organisms in which all the microorganisms are either excluded or known. Current techniques for microbiome profiling Microbial community Morgan et al. (2012) Trends in
    [Show full text]
  • Perfluorooctanoic Acid (Pfoa) and Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (Pfos)
    WATER QUALITY FACT SHEET: PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID (PFOA) AND PERFLUOROOCTANESULFONIC ACID (PFOS) Chemical Properties: • PFOA and PFOS are fluorinated organic chemicals that are part of a larger man-made chemical group referred to as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are resistant to heat, water, and oil. • The chemicals have been used in consumer products such as carpets, clothing, fabrics for furniture, paper packaging for food, and other materials (e.g., cookware) designed to be waterproof, stain- resistant or non-stick. • They also have been used in fire-retarding foam at airfields, military bases, and various industrial processes. • PFOA and PFOS have been the most extensively produced and studied PFAS. PFAS also includes GenX chemicals and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) which require further study. • PFAS tends to accumulate in groundwater with contamination typically localized and associated with facilities where the chemicals were produced or used to manufacture other products. Health Concerns: • In 2016, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued a lifetime health advisory for PFOA and PFOS for drinking water. Municipalities were advised that they should notify their customers of the presence of levels over 70 ppt (0.07 µg/L) in community water supplies. • Studies indicate that PFOA and PFOS may result in adverse health effects including developmental effects to fetuses during pregnancy or breastfed infants, cancer, liver effects, immune effects, thyroid effects, and cholesterol changes. Regulatory Considerations: • The USEPA has not regulated PFOA and PFOS. There is no Federal MCL or MCLG. • In August 2019, the California State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water (DDW) updated notification levels for PFOA and PFOS from 14 ppt to 5.1 ppt for PFOA and from 13 ppt to 6.5 ppt for PFOS.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfluorooctanoic Acid Levels, Nuclear Receptor Gene Polymorphisms, And
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Associations among perfuorooctanesulfonic/ perfuorooctanoic acid levels, nuclear receptor gene polymorphisms, and lipid levels in pregnant women in the Hokkaido study Sumitaka Kobayashi1, Fumihiro Sata1,2, Houman Goudarzi1,3, Atsuko Araki1, Chihiro Miyashita1, Seiko Sasaki4, Emiko Okada5, Yusuke Iwasaki6, Tamie Nakajima7 & Reiko Kishi1* The efect of interactions between perfuorooctanesulfonic (PFOS)/perfuorooctanoic acid (PFOA) levels and nuclear receptor genotypes on fatty acid (FA) levels, including those of triglycerides, is not clear understood. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to analyse the association of PFOS/PFOA levels and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in nuclear receptors with FA levels in pregnant women. We analysed 504 mothers in a birth cohort between 2002 and 2005 in Japan. Serum PFOS/ PFOA and FA levels were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Maternal genotypes in PPARA (rs1800234; rs135561), PPARG (rs3856806), PPARGC1A (rs2970847; rs8192678), PPARD (rs1053049; rs2267668), CAR (rs2307424; rs2501873), LXRA (rs2279238) and LXRB (rs1405655; rs2303044; rs4802703) were analysed. When gene-environment interaction was considered, PFOS exposure (log10 scale) decreased palmitic, palmitoleic, and oleic acid levels (log10 scale), with the observed β in the range of − 0.452 to − 0.244; PPARGC1A (rs8192678) and PPARD (rs1053049; rs2267668) genotypes decreased triglyceride, palmitic, palmitoleic, and oleic acid levels, with the observed β in the range of − 0.266 to − 0.176. Interactions between PFOS exposure and SNPs were signifcant for palmitic acid (Pint = 0.004 to 0.017). In conclusion, the interactions between maternal PFOS levels and PPARGC1A or PPARD may modify maternal FA levels. Te genetic makeup of a person and the environmental factors might be responsible for regulating the levels of serum lipids, such as fatty acids (FA) and triglycerides (TG)1.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Factors, Epigenetics, and Developmental Origin of Reproductive Disorders
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Reprod Manuscript Author Toxicol. Author Manuscript Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 March 01. Published in final edited form as: Reprod Toxicol. 2017 March ; 68: 85–104. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.07.011. Environmental Factors, Epigenetics, and Developmental Origin of Reproductive Disorders Shuk-Mei Hoa,b,c,d,*, Ana Cheonga,b, Margaret A. Adgente, Jennifer Veeversa,c, Alisa A. Suenf,g, Neville N.C. Tama,b,c, Yuet-Kin Leunga,b,c, Wendy N. Jeffersonf, and Carmen J. Williamsf,* aDepartment of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America bCenter for Environmental Genetics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America cCincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America dCincinnati Veteran Affairs Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America eDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America fReproductive Medicine Group, Reproductive & Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America gCurriculum in Toxicology, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America Abstract Sex-specific differentiation, development, and function of the reproductive system are largely dependent on steroid hormones. For this reason, developmental exposure
    [Show full text]
  • Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)
    PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID 1. Exposure Data 1.1.2 Structural and molecular formulae, and relative molecular mass: straight-chain 1.1 Identification of the agent isomer 1.1.1 Nomenclature F FFF F F F O F Chem. Abstr. Serv. Reg. No.: 335-67-1 OH Chem. Abstr. Serv. Name: Perfluorooctanoic FFF F F F F acid Molecular formula: C8HF15O2 IUPAC Name: 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8- Relative molecular mass: 414 pentadecafluorooctanoic acid Synonyms: PFOA; pentadecafluoro-1-octan - 1.1.3 Chemical and physical properties of the oic acid; pentadecafluoro-n-octanoic acid; pure substance: straight-chain isomer pentadecaflurooctanoic acid; perfluoro- caprylic acid; perfluoroctanoic acid; From HSDB (2014), unless otherwise perfluoroheptanecarboxylic acid; APFO; indicated ammonium perfluorooctanoate Description: White to off-white powder Isomers and Salts: There are 39 possible struc- Boiling point: 192.4 °C tural isomers of pentadecafluorooctanoic acid (1 with chain length 8, 5 with chain Melting point: 54.3 °C length 7, 13 with chain length 6, 16 with chain Density: 1.792 g/cm3 at 20 °C length 5, and 4 with chain length 4). These Solubility: 9.5 g/L in water at 25 °C isomers can also exist as the ammonium, Vapour pressure: 0.0023 kPa at 20 °C (extrap- sodium, or potassium salt (Nielsen, 2012). olated); 0.127 kPa at 59.25 °C (measured) Fig. 1.1 presents the few isomers and salts (ATSDR, 2009); 0.070 kPa at 25 °C that have Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Stability: When heated to decomposition it references.
    [Show full text]
  • Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Differentially Inhibit Placental Trophoblast Migration and Invasion in Vitro John T
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 1–10 doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaa043 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/toxsci/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/toxsci/kfaa043/5812793 by University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill user on 19 May 2020 Advance Access Publication Date: March 27, 2020 Research Article Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Differentially Inhibit Placental Trophoblast Migration and Invasion In Vitro John T. Szilagyi ,*,† Anastasia N. Freedman,* Stewart L. Kepper,* Arjun M. Keshava,* Jackie T. Bangma,*,‡ and Rebecca C. Fry*,†,‡,1 *Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health; †Curriculum in Toxicology; and ‡Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516 1To whom correspondence should be addressed at Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, CB 7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27516. Fax: (919) 843-9047. E-mail: [email protected]. ABSTRACT Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are used as industrial surfactants and chemical coatings for household goods such as Teflon. Despite regulatory efforts to phase out legacy PFAS, they remain detectable in drinking water throughout the United States. This is due to the stability of legacy PFAS and the continued use of replacement compounds. In humans, PFAS have been detected in placenta and cord blood and are associated with low birth weight and preeclampsia risk. Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal mortality and is driven by insufficient endometrial trophoblast invasion, resulting in poor placental blood flow. PFAS alter invasion of other cell types, but their impact on trophoblasts is not understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Novel Synthetic Routes to the Epoxyketooctadecanoic Acids
    DEVELOPMENT OF NOVEL SYNTHETIC ROUTES TO THE EPOXYKETOOCTADECANOIC ACIDS (EKODES) AND THEIR BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION AS ACTIVATORS OF THE PPAR FAMILY OF NUCLEAR RECEPTORS By ROOZBEH ESKANDARI Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Thesis Advisor: Gregory P. Tochtrop, Ph.D. Department of Chemistry CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January, 2016 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of ROOZBEH ESKANDARI Candidate for the Ph.D degree *. (signed) Anthony J. Pearson, PhD (Chair of the committee) Gregory P. Tochtrop, PhD (Advisor) Michael G. Zagorski, PhD Blanton S. Tolbert, PhD Witold K. Surewicz, PhD (Department of Physiology and Biophysics) (date) 14th July, 2015 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. I dedicate this work to my sister Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ i List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... vii List of Schemes .......................................................................................................................... ix Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]