1 Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Public

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Public 1 NUNAVUT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A REGIONAL TOTAL ALLOWABLE HARVEST FOR THE BLUENOSE EAST CARIBOU HERD June 16, 2016 Pages 1 TO 274 HELD AT THE COMMUNITY HALL CAMBRIDGE BAY, NUNAVUT VOLUME 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Daniel Shewchuk Acting Chair Simeonie Keenainak Member David Kritterdlik Member Charlie Inuarak Member Caleb Sangoya Member David Igutsaq Member 2 NWMB: Jason Akearok Executive Director Eric Kan Director of Administration Peter Kydd Director of Wildlife Management Erin Keenan Terrestrial Wildlife Management Biologist Eric Idlaut Communications Coordinator Sheila Oolayou IQ Coordinator Michael d'Eça Legal Counsel Evie Amagoalik Interpreter Leetia Janes Interpreter Henry Ohokannoak Interpreter Joe Otokiak Interpreter Adele Jones Stenographer GOVERNMENT OF NUNAVUT Drikus Gissing Director of Wildlife Lisa Marie Leclerc Kitikmeot Regional Biologist Mathieu Dumond Wildlife Manager GOVERNMENT OF NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Lynda Yonge Director of Wildlife Jan Adamczewski Wildlife Biologist, Ungulates 3 NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INCORPORATED Paul Irngaut Director of Wildlife & Environment Bert Dean Assistant Director of Wildlife & Environment KITIKMEOT REGIONAL WILDLIFE BOARD Simon Qingnaqtuq Chair Ema Qaqqutaq Regional Coordinator Eva Ayalik Regional Coordinator (Kitikmeot West) KUGLUKTUK HUNTERS AND TRAPPERS ASSOCIATION Kevin Klengenberg Secretary-Treasurer Larry Adjun Chair Gustin Adjun Vice-Chair Peter Taktogon Director Jorgen Bolt Director 4 BATHURST HUNTERS AND TRAPPERS ASSOCIATION Peter Kapolak Chair Mary Kaniak Elder Joseph Tikhak Elder BAY CHIMO HTO Connie Kapolak Chair Sam Kapolak Director CAMBRIDGE BAY HUNTERS AND TRAPPERS ORGANIZATION Bobby Greenley Chair George Angohiatok Vice-Chair KITIKMEOT INUIT ASSOCIATION Stan Anablak President Attima Hadlari Vice-President Wildlife & Environment Paul Emingak Executive Director Geoff Clark Director of Land, Environment & Resources John Donihee Legal counsel 5 NORTH SLAVE METIS ASSOCIATION Shin Shiga Regulatory Analyst WEK'ÈEZHÌI RENEWABLE RESOURCES BOARD Jonas Lafferty Board Member Jody Pellissey Executive Director PUBLIC Jimmy Haniliak Cambridge Bay Elder James Panioyak Cambridge Bay Elder Sam Angohiatok Elder 6 I N D E X Page Opening and Prayer 8 GOVERNMENT OF NUNAVUT SUBMISSION 9 Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Questions and 16 Comments Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Staff Questions 35 and Comments Kugluktuk HTO Questions and Comments 46 Bathurst Inlet HTO Questions and Comments 64 Bay Chimo HTO Questions and Comments 67 Cambridge Bay HTO Questions and Comments 68 Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Questions and 73 Comments Kitikmeot Inuit Association Questions and Comments 84 GOVERNMENT OF NORTHWEST TERRITORIES SUBMISSION 126 Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Questions and 157 Comments Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Staff Questions 177 and Comments Kitikmeot Regional Wildlife Board Questions and 180 Comments Kugluktuk HTO Questions and Comments 187 Bay Chimo HTO Questions and Comments 204 7 Cambridge Bay HTO Questions and Comments 206 Elders Questions and Comments 210 Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Questions and 219 Comments Kitikmeot Inuit Association Questions and Comments 229 KITIKMEOT REGIONAL WILDLIFE BOARD SUBMISSION 239 Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Questions and 243 Comments Kugluktuk HTO Questions and Comments 251 Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Questions and 254 Comments Kitikmeot Inuit Association Questions and Comments 254 KUGLUKTUK HTO SUBMISSION 256 Certificate of Transcript 274 8 1 OPENING AND PRAYER 2 THE CHAIR: Good morning, everybody. Welcome 3 back again to our new meeting agenda and a public hearing 4 for Bluenose East caribou herd. I hope you all had a good 5 rest last night. I think everybody's a little tired right 6 now, too, but to open the meeting up I would like Caleb to 7 say an opening prayer. Thank you. 8 (PRAYER) 9 THE CHAIR: Thank you, Caleb. 10 Okay. Just a few little items before we begin. 11 I don't think there's any need for introductions, as we all 12 know each other, and I don't believe there's anybody new at 13 table at all. 14 So I think all of you have your briefing binders 15 for organization in front of you. If you don't, please let 16 us know. Also, again, there's digital hearing material 17 also available on chips on your computers, if need be. 18 I think that the decision we made yesterday is a 19 important one, that the transcripts and information that 20 was passed on in the last hearing will be transferred to 21 this hearing, so we do all have all that record of 22 information that's common to both hearings on file, and I 23 just ask you all to remember that when making your 24 submissions and asking questions. 25 So with that, up is Government of Nunavut. And, 9 1 Drikus, I'll hand the floor over to you. Lisa Marie, go 2 ahead. 3 GOVERNMENT OF NUNAVUT SUBMISSION 4 MS. LECLERC: Mr. Chair, I'm Lisa Marie, the 5 regional biologist for the Kitikmeot Region; and as for the 6 Bathurst herd, I'm going to do the presentation for the 7 Bluenose caribou. 8 As we agreed yesterday, I'm going to try to 9 mention, but forward a little bit, what was already 10 explained and precise where need to be and what's actually 11 specific for the Bluenose caribou. 12 So as I mentioned for the Bathurst caribou herd, 13 the presentation I'm going to be presenting to you is 14 actually the same presentation that was presented to the 15 HTO, RWO, and NTI and co-management partners in January 16 14-15, 2016. And, in addition, what I want to precise is, 17 during that meeting when we were talking about caribou, the 18 herd was specified at each time to make sure that we were 19 talking about the right harvest management for the right 20 herd for clarity. Next slide. 21 So here's, again, the Government of Nunavut 22 mandate. I'm not going to go through it. As was explained 23 yesterday, there's a lot of caribou, subpopulation caribou, 24 in the Kitikmeot region, but the one that we're going to 25 focus today -- the third slide -- is the Bluenose East 10 1 caribou. 2 So when you look at this map, that herd range is 3 represented in yellow. So this herd actually is found 4 calving around Kugluktuk, at the very proximity of 5 Kugluktuk south of it, all the way west to the Bluenose 6 East lake (verbatim), and then in the wintertime, that herd 7 moves down in the tree line in the Northwest Territories. 8 When we look at the Bluenose herd estimate from 9 2000-2015, we see that there were decline from 2000 to 10 2005, but that decline was actually confirmed in 2006. 11 After the peak of the population in 2010, which the 12 population was estimated at 123,000 caribou, the herd was 13 declining to 68,000 in 2013. 14 So, once again, all the report survey, 15 population update was mentioned to HTO and KRWB at 16 different ongoing meetings, especially AGM, and there were 17 all report of the public. 18 For this herd, specific to this herd, since 19 2009, there were ongoing management plan meeting to develop 20 the taking care of the caribou where the Bluenose herd is 21 actually mentioned. There were ongoing public 22 consultation. There were specific even in Cambridge Bay 23 and Kugluktuk that was taken every year (verbatim), and 24 there were the workshop in 2007 that actually included 25 discussion on the Bluenose East herd. 11 1 I really want to point out the community-based 2 management action that Kugluktuk has developed. Their 3 education awareness program, there were shift to harvest 4 alternative species such as muskox, there were no sport or 5 commercial harvest of Bluenose caribou in Nunavut -- as 6 Kugluktuk -- and there were very strong participation at 7 consultation meeting, workshop, and so on, that touched 8 that herd. 9 So, as you know, the 2013 population estimate 10 was 68,000. In June 2014, during the reconnaissance 11 survey, it showed that the herd has declined or was 12 continuous between 2013 and '14. There were intermediate 13 population size, there were reduced recruitment between 14 2012 and 2014, there were reduced pregnancy rate from 2010 15 to 2012, and there were low adult survival rate. 16 So at this time, once again, we started 17 consulting with the Kugluktuk HTO, which the DoE represent 18 as the main user and harvester of that Bluenose caribou 19 herd. So most of the meeting was included Kugluktuk. The 20 February 2011 meeting, even if both herd was addressed, 21 Kugluktuk was actually -- the first TAH proposal was 22 discussed for the Bluenose herd. At this time, we didn't 23 know how the population estimate was, so we had to go back 24 to the last one, the 2013 estimate. So that was putting 25 the herd in an intermediate size; they were not doing as 12 1 good as they were in 2010. 2 I just want to precise here or give you a little 3 bit background information between going a little bit more 4 on what was done or discussed in that February 2011 5 meeting. 6 So the BKCMB which is a different management 7 plan for the Beverly and Qamanijuaq Porcupine, the 8 Porcupine herd management plan, and also ENR, have 9 developed a rule of thumb for harvest, like, basically what 10 percentage of harvest should be acceptable depending on how 11 well the herd are doing. So, basically, when a herd go in 12 red, it's zero; orange, 1 percent harvest; when the herd is 13 in medium, well, could be from 2 to 4 percent in yellow; 14 and when the herd is doing very well, it's 5 and plus 15 percent.
Recommended publications
  • 3.1.9 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat This Section of the Document Focuses On
    EIRB File No. 02/10-05 May 2011 ISSUED FOR USE 215 3.1.9 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat This section of the document focuses on terrestrial mammals likely to be found within the local and regional study area and is based on a review of background information and traditional knowledge as well as the results of field studies. As defined under the IFA, “wildlife” means all fauna in a wild state other than reindeer. Section 3.1.9 considers terrestrial mammals and Section 3.1.10 considers birds. 3.1.9.1 Terrestrial Mammals There are 34 species of terrestrial mammals potentially occurring in the Regional Study Area for the proposed Highway (Table 3.1.9-1). The local and regional abundance and distribution of these species varies considerably depending on habitat availability and access to terrain suitable for various life history phases, such as calving and denning. No terrestrial mammal species were assessed as “at risk” under the NWT General Status Ranking Program (GNWT ENR 2011a). TABLE 3.1.9-1 TERRESTRIAL MAMMALS POTENTIALLY OCCURRING WITHIN THE REGIONAL STUDY AREA Common Name Scientific Name NWT General Status Rank Cinereus Shrew (Masked Shrew) Sorex cinereus Secure Dusky Shrew Sorex monticolus Secure Arctic Shrew Sorex arcticus Secure Tundra Shrew Sorex tundrensis Undetermined Barren-ground Shrew Sorex ugyunak Undetermined Snowshoe Hare Lepus americanus Secure Arctic Hare Lepus arcticus Secure Arctic Ground Squirrel Spermophilus parryii Secure Red Squirrel Tamiasciurus hudsonicus Secure Beaver Castor canadensis Secure Northern Red-backed
    [Show full text]
  • Barren-Ground Caribou Management in the Northwest Territories
    Barren-Ground Caribou Management in the Northwest Territories: An Independent Peer Review January 16, 2008 Jason T. Fisher Laurence D. Roy Michelle Hiltz Alberta Research Council Sustainable Ecosystems Unit Ecological Conservation Management Program Vegreville, Alberta, Canada. 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents................................................................................................................ 2 Preface................................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 4 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 6 I. Herd-based management ................................................................................................. 7 1. Sample size of collared animals.- ............................................................................. 11 2. Experimental design of collaring surveys.- .............................................................. 14 3. Lack of data on demographic rates for herds.- ......................................................... 16 Conclusions.- ................................................................................................................ 16 II.
    [Show full text]
  • MUSKOX (Ovibos Moschatus) DISTRIBUTION and ABUNDANCE, MUSKOX MANAGEMENT UNITS MX09, WEST of the COPPERMINE RIVER, AUGUST 2017
    MUSKOX (Ovibos moschatus) DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE, MUSKOX MANAGEMENT UNITS MX09, WEST OF THE COPPERMINE RIVER, AUGUST 2017. Lisa-Marie Leclerc1 Version: November 2018 For Nunavut Wildlife Research Trust 1Wildlife Biologist Kitikmeot Region, Department of Environment Wildlife Research Section, Government of Nunavut Box 377 Kugluktuk NU X0B 0E0 STATUS REPORT XXXX-XX NUNAVUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH SECTION KUGLUKTUK, NU i ii Executive Summary The muskox in the West Kugluktuk management units (MX09) are the westernmost indigenous muskoxen in North American. Systematic strips transect survey took place in August 2017 to determine the muskox abundance and distribution in this area. A total of 8,591 km2 were flown, representing 16% coverage of the study area of 53,215 km2. During the survey, 87 adult muskoxen were recorded on transect resulting in an estimated number of 539 ± 150 (S.E.). The population in MX09 have been mostly stable since 1994, and it is consistent with local observations. Muskox distribution had not change from the historical one. Muskoxen have taken advantage of the wetter and lower-lying area in the Rae-Richardson River Valley that is within the proximity of uplands that provide them with suitable forage and a refugee from predators. The calf to adult ratio was 38% and the average number of adult per group was small, 6.21 ± 6.6. (S.D.). Muskox density was the lowest encounter within the Kitikmeot region with 0.010 muskox / km2 since 2013. The next survey of this area should be effectuated no later than 2023, so harvest quota could be review. iii Table of Contents Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Muskoxen Distribution and Abundance in the Area West of the Coppermine River, Kitikmeot Region, Nunavut
    MUSKOXEN DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE IN THE AREA WEST OF THE COPPERMINE RIVER, KITIKMEOT REGION, NUNAVUT Mathieu Dumond1 1Kitikmeot Wildlife Biologist, Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, P.O. Box 377, Kugluktuk, NU X0B 0E0 2007 Status Report, No. 33 Dumond, M. 2006. Muskoxen distribution and abundance in the area west of the Coppermine River, Kitikmeot Region, Nunavut. Government of Nunavut, Department of Environment, Status report: 33, Iqaluit, 31 pp. Dumond M. 2007. Muskox Distribution and Abundance in the Western Kitikmeot MUSKOXEN DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE IN THE AREA WEST OF THE COPPERMINE RIVER, KITIKMEOT REGION, NUNAVUT (MAY 2007) Mathieu Dumond Kitikmeot Wildlife Biologist Department of Environment Government of Nunavut Kugluktuk 2007 File Report No XXX 0 Dumond M. 2007. Muskox Distribution and Abundance in the Western Kitikmeot Summary An aerial muskox survey was conducted from May 15 to May 19, 2007 in the Western Kitikmeot, Nunavut (area west of the Coppermine River to Bluenose Lake and from Dismal Lake in the south to the mainland shoreline of the Dolphin and Union Strait – MX12). The survey area was divided into two strata, High Density Area (HAD) covered at 42% and Low Density Area (LDA) covered at 25%. In the high density area (HDA) (13,404 km2), we counted 159 adult muskoxen and 34 calves on the transects and estimated 377 adult muskoxen (±75 S.E., CV=0.20) with 21.4% of calves in the population. In the low density area (LDA) (16,791 km2), we counted 33 adult muskoxen and 15 calves on the transects. And estimated 132 adult muskoxen (±71 S.E., CV=0.54) with 45.5% of calves in the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Topographical
    University of Waikato Library: Map Collection Canada: topographical maps 1: 250,000 The Map Collection of the University of Waikato Library contains a comprehensive collection of maps from around the world with detailed coverage of New Zealand and the Pacific : Editions are first unless stated. These maps are held in storage on Level 1 Please ask a librarian if you would like to use one: Coverage of Canadian Provinces Province Covered by sectors On pages Alberta 72-74 and 82-84 pp. 14, 16 British Columbia 82-83, 92-94, 102-104 and 114 pp. 16-20 Manitoba 52-54 and 62-64 pp. 10, 12 New Brunswick 21 and 22 p. 3 Newfoundland and Labrador 01-02, 11, 13-14 and 23-25) pp. 1-4 Northwest Territories 65-66, 75-79, 85-89, 95-99 and 105-107) pp. 12-21 Nova Scotia 11 and 20-210) pp. 2-3 Nunavut 15-16, 25-27, 29, 35-39, 45-49, 55-59, 65-69, 76-79, pp. 3-7, 9-13, 86-87, 120, 340 and 560 15, 21 Ontario 30-32, 40-44 and 52-54 pp. 5, 6, 8-10 Prince Edward Island 11 and 21 p. 2 Quebec 11-14, 21-25 and 31-35 pp. 2-7 Saskatchewan 62-63 and 72-74 pp. 12, 14 Yukon 95,105-106 and 115-117 pp. 18, 20-21 The sector numbers begin in the southeast of Canada: They proceed west and north. 001 Newfoundland 001K Trepassey 3rd ed. 1989 001L St: Lawrence 4th ed. 1989 001M Belleoram 3rd ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Care of Caribou
    Taking Care of Caribou The CAPE BATHURST, BLUENOSE-WEST, AND BLUENOSE-EAST BARREN-GROUND CARIBOU HERDS MANAGEMENT PLAN Advisory Committee for Cooperation on Wildlife Management November 3, 2014 Suggested citation: Advisory Committee for Cooperation on Wildlife Management. 2014. Taking Care of Caribou: the Cape Bathurst, Bluenose-West, and Bluenose-East barren-ground caribou herds management plan. Yellowknife, NT. Production note: This report was prepared by the Bluenose Caribou Management Plan Working Group. For additional copies contact: Advisory Committee for Cooperation on Wildlife Management c/o Wek’ èezhıì Renewable Resources Board 102 A 4504 49th Avenue, Yellowknife, NT X1A 1A7 Tel.: (867) 873-5740 Fax: (867) 873-5743 Email: [email protected] About the ACCWM The Advisory Committee for Cooperation on Wildlife Management was established to exchange information, help develop cooperation and consensus, and make recommendations regarding wildlife and wildlife habitat issues that cross land claim and treaty boundaries. The committee consists of Chairpersons (or alternate appointees) of the Wildlife Management Advisory Council (NWT), Gwich’in Renewable Resources Board, Ɂehdzo Got’ın̨ ę Gots’e ̨̨́ Nákedı (Sahtú Renewable Resources Board), Wek’èezhìi Renewable Resources Board, Kitikmeot Regional Wildlife Board, and Tuktut Nogait National Park Management Board. About this plan The ACCWM decided to develop a plan for the Cape Bathurst, Bluenose-West, and Bluenose-East barren-ground caribou herds. While the immediate need for the plan was in response to reported declines in the herds, the intent is for the plan to address caribou management and stewardship over the long term. This plan was developed in consultation with most of the communities that harvest from the three herds.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Barren Ground Caribou Calving Distribution Surveys, Northwest
    2007 Barren-ground Caribou Calving Distribution Surveys – Northwest Territories & Nunavut 1 Summary: 2007 Barren-ground Caribou Calving Distribution Surveys, Northwest Territories & Nunavut Environment & Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories Overview: The 2006-2010 Caribou Management Strategy of the Northwest Territories (NT) called for increased monitoring of the status and distribution of territorial barren-ground caribou herds. Barren- ground caribou herds across their North American range have been named and managed based on their calving grounds, and the importance of these habitats to herd productivity and calf survival has been widely recognized. In June 2007, for the first time, the calving ground distribution of the large mainland migratory barren-ground herds across the NT were surveyed near the peak of calving. Most NT herds range over large areas that include portions of Nunavut, the prairie provinces, and Yukon, thus monitoring of these herds requires inter-jurisdictional cooperation. This summary briefly describes the results of the calving ground distribution surveys carried out in June 2007 by NT government staff, in cooperation with Nunavut government staff and community observers. The following herds were surveyed (from west to east): Tuktoyaktuk Peninsula1, Cape Bathurst, Bluenose-West, Bluenose-East, Bathurst, Beverly, Ahiak, and Qamanirjuaq. More complete survey reports will be needed for co-management boards, partners and stake-holders; this summary describes the main findings, with maps showing calving grounds, including areas of higher and lower concentration. Surveys were carried out with small fixed-wing aircraft in June 2007. A systematic approach was used, with parallel flight lines 5 or 10 km apart. The extent of area flown was guided by locations of radio-collared caribou and previous survey information, and flight lines continued until no more groups of calving caribou were seen.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Setting
    3. Biological Setting The NWT Diamonds Project is located in the central portion of the Northwest Territories halfway between Great Slave and Great Bear lakes. Mine development will take place north of Lac de Gras in the tundra environment, approximately 200 km south of the Arctic Circle. The NWT Diamonds Project is situated within the Southern Arctic Ecozone. This ecological classification refers to particular ecological characteristics as defined by Environment Canada and Agriculture Canada (Ecological Stratification Working Group 1995). Specifically, the project is within ecosection 41 of the Takijua Lake Upland Ecoregion (Figure 3-1). The climate in the Lac de Gras area is extreme as summers are generally short and cool and winters are long and cold. Precipitation is sparse and consists of relatively equal portions of rain and snow. Winds are moderate and are predominately from the northwest. Due to the harsh physiographic conditions, there has been little soil development in the Lac de Gras area. Most of the ground consists of permafrost. Small amounts of soil are found along the tops of eskers and around the shores of lakes adjacent to wetlands. Severe climatic conditions and poor soil have resulted in relatively little vegetation. The project site is approximately 100 km north of the tree line. Vegetation is typically low in stature and dominated by lichens, mosses, herbs and low shrubs. Most plant species are perennial with low annual growth rates. Little aquatic vegetation is present. The site of the NWT Diamonds Project provides habitat for a number of large and small mammals. The Bathurst caribou herd migrates through the area during spring and fall.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC HEARING on the 2016 DRAFT NUNAVUT LAND USE PLAN Kitikmeot Regional Wildlife Board PRE-HEA
    NUNAVUT PLANNING COMMISSION – PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2016 DRAFT NUNAVUT LAND USE PLAN Kitikmeot Regional Wildlife Board PRE-HEARING WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS Filed by: Ema Qaqqutaq Tuesday, February 28, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Background ....................................................................................................................[p. 2] 2. General Comments and Recommendations ...................................................................[p. 3] 3. Specific Comments and Recommendations ...................................................................[p. 6] 4. Works Cited ....................................................................................................................[p. 10] 1 Kitikmeot Regional Wildlife Board Submission for the Public Hearing on the 2016 Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan February 28, 2017 1. Background Under the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement, the Kitikmeot Regional Wildlife Board (KRWB) is responsible for the overall management of harvesting with members of regional Hunters and Trappers Organizations (HTO), regulating harvesting practices and techniques within the Kitikmeot region, as well as the allocation and enforcement of regional basic needs levels and adjusted basic needs levels among these HTOs. As such, the KRWB represents HTOs and their members from the communities of Bathurst Inlet, Ekaluktutiak, Gjoa Haven, Kugluktuk, Kugaaruk, Umingmaktok, and Taloyoak. With the goal of bringing the voices of Elders, harvesters and other community members to the forefront, the KRWB has carried
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Arctic
    ECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Southern Arctic Ecosystem Classification Group Department of Environment and Natural Resources Government of the Northwest Territories 2012 ECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES SOUTHERN ARCTIC This report may be cited as: Ecosystem Classification Group. 2012. Ecological Regions of the Northwest Territories – Southern Arctic. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT, Canada. x + 170 pp. + insert map. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Northwest Territories. Ecosystem Classification Group Ecological regions of the Northwest Territories, southern Arctic / Ecosystem Classification Group. ISBN 978-0-7708-0199-1 1. Ecological regions--Northwest Territories. 2. Biotic communities--Arctic regions. 3. Tundra ecology--Northwest Territories. 4. Taiga ecology--Northwest Territories. I. Northwest Territories. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources II. Title. QH106.2 N55 N67 2012 577.3'7097193 C2012-980098-8 Web Site: http://www.enr.gov.nt.ca For more information contact: Department of Environment and Natural Resources P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Phone: (867) 920-8064 Fax: (867) 873-0293 About the cover: The small digital images in the inset boxes are enlarged with captions on pages 28 (Tundra Plains Low Arctic (north) Ecoregion) and 82 (Tundra Shield Low Arctic (south) Ecoregion). Aerial images: Dave Downing. Main cover image, ground images and plant images: Bob Decker, Government of the Northwest Territories. Document images: Except where otherwise credited, aerial images in the document were taken by Dave Downing and ground-level images were taken by Bob Decker, Government of the Northwest Territories. Members of the Ecosystem Classification Group Dave Downing Ecologist, Onoway, Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • Barren-Ground Caribou Co-Management in the Northwest Territories a Companion Guide to Wildlife Co-Management in the Northwest Territories
    Barren-ground Caribou Co-Management in the Northwest Territories A Companion Guide to Wildlife Co-Management in the Northwest Territories TABLE OF CONTENTS Co-Management and Caribou Management Boards .............................................................................. 3 Porcupine Caribou ................................................................................................................................... 6 Tuktoyaktuk Peninsula Caribou ............................................................................................................... 7 Cape Bathurst Caribou ............................................................................................................................. 8 Bluenose-West Caribou ........................................................................................................................... 9 Bluenose-East Caribou ........................................................................................................................... 10 Bathurst Caribou .................................................................................................................................... 11 Beverly Caribou ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Qamanirjuaq Caribou ............................................................................................................................ 13 Ahiak Caribou ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Weather of the Yukon, Northwest Territories and Western Nunavut Graphic Area Forecast 35
    YUKON-E05 11/12/05 10:03 PM Page 3 TheThe WeatheWeather ooff tthehe Yukon,Yukon, NNorthwestorthwest TTerritorieserritories andand WesterWestern NunavutNunavut GraphicGraphic AreaArea ForecastForecast 3355 YUKON-E05 11/12/05 10:03 PM Page i TheThe WeatheWeather ofof tthehe Yukon,Yukon, NNorthwestorthwest TTerritorieserritories andand WesterWestern NunavutNunavut GraphicGraphic AreaArea ForecastForecast 3535 by Ross Klock Ed Hudson David Aihoshi John Mullock YUKON-E05 11/12/05 10:03 PM Page ii Copyright Copyright © 2001 NAV CANADA. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, including photocopying or transmission electronically to any computer, without prior written consent of NAV CANADA. The information contained in this document is confidential and proprietary to NAV CANADA and may not be used or disclosed except as expressly authorized in writing by NAV CANADA. Trademarks Product names mentioned in this document may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies and are hereby acknowledged. Relief Maps Copyright © 2000. Government of Canada with permission from Natural Resources Canada Design and illustration by Ideas in Motion Kelowna, British Columbia ph: (250) 717-5937 [email protected] YUKON-E05 11/12/05 10:03 PM Page iii LAKP-Yukon, NWT, Nunavut iii The Weather of the Yukon, Northwest Territories and Western Nunavut Graphic Area Forecast 35 Preface For NAV CANADA’s Flight Service Specialists (FSS), providing weather briefin- gs to help pilots navigate through the day-to-day fluctuations in the weather is a crit- ical role. While available weather products are becoming increasingly more sophisti- cated and at the same time more easily understood, an understanding of local and regional climatological patterns is essential to the effective performance of this role.
    [Show full text]