DOCSLIB.ORG

Alternative Option Analysis Criteria for Fixing Alignment for Greenfield Green Field Highway 1. the Greenfield Alignment Between

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alternative Option Analysis Criteria for Fixing Alignment for Greenfield Green Field Highway 1. the Greenfield Alignment Between Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder Routes (Expressway) to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana (Lot-4/Pkg-4) Alternative Option Analysis Criteria for Fixing Alignment for Greenfield Green field highway 1. The Greenfield alignment between two terminal stations should be short and straight as far as possible, but due to engineering, social and environmental considerations some deviations may be required. 2. The project should be constructible and easy to maintain; the Greenfield project should reduce the vehicle operation cost with respect to the existing option already available i.e. using the NH/SHs in combination to reach from point A to point B. 3. It should be safe at all stages i.e. during design, construction and operation stages. Safety audits at each stage should confirm the same. 4. The project initial cost, maintenance cost, and operating cost should be optimum so as to be considered economical with respect to its options. 5. The Greenfield alignment should be finalised giving due consideration to siting/location of major structures including Major/Minor Bridges, Interchanges and ROBs. The space requirement of interchanges to be kept into consideration to avoid major resettlement. 6. Tunnel / Box cutting of Hills should be considered as the last option and should be provided only when it is absolutely necessary. 7. The location of spurs for connecting the important towns to be decided while fixing the alignment Options. 8. The alignment should follow the unused / barren land to the extent possible to reduce the cost of land acquisition. 9. The proposed options in the present case connects the under developed regions of the state which would lead to the development of new growth centres along the proposed highway i.e. paving the way for economic development of the region. Obligatory points through which Greenfield alignment options should not pass are detailed below: Habitations: Proposed alignment is fixed in such a way that traverses at a minimum distance of 150m from built up areas and avoiding important buildings and structures. However, few isolated buildings falling along the alignment cannot be avoided due to Geometric requirements. Wildlife Sanctuaries, National Parks, Reserve Forest and other Eco Sensitive Zones: Utmost care is taken while fixing the alignment near wildlife sanctuaries and national parks. The MOEF&CC guidelines have been adhered to and the alignment has been fixed keeping it away from WLS, Sanctuaries and Tiger Reserves. It was not possible to completely avoid the protected and reserve forest areas. However, every effort has been made to reduce the acquisition of forest area. Water Bodies: The Greenfield alignment has been fixed taking due consideration & importance of retaining the existing water bodies as far as feasible. Railway Crossings and Important Structures: The components which increases the project cost are the presence of the Major bridges, ROBs and other structures. In order to reduce the project cost number of structures and its length were given due consideration while finalising the Greenfield Option. Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder Routes (Expressway) to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana (Lot-4/Pkg-4) Alternative Option Analysis The comparative statement for proposed alignment is given in below table: S. No Description Option I Option II Option III 1 Length, km 374.142 359.737 373.031 Alignment starts at Alignment starts at Alignment starts at 2 Start point Haryana/Rajasthan Border (near Haryana/Rajasthan Border (near Haryana/Rajasthan Border (near Firozpur Jhirka) in Alwar district. Firozpur Jhirka) in Alwar district. Firozpur Jhirka) in Alwar district. Alignment ends at Rajasthan/ M.P. Alignment ends at Rajasthan/ M.P. Alignment ends at Rajasthan/ 3 End point Border in Kota district. Border in Kota district. M.P. Border in Kota district. Alwar, Bharatpur, Karauli, Dausa, Alwar, Bharatpur, Karauli, Dausa, Alwar, Bharatpur, Dausa, Sawai 4 Districts Sawai Madhopur, Tonk, Bundi and Sawai Madhopur, Tonk, Bundi and Madhopur, Tonk, Bundi and Kota Kota Kota NH21, NH23, NH27, NH52, NH21, NH23, NH27, NH52 NH21, NH23, NH27, NH52, NH552 NH148, NH552 5 Connecting Highways SH45, SH14, SH35, SH44, SH30, SH1, SH9A, SH14, SH24, SH25, SH45, SH14, SH35, SH44, SH25, SH1, SH29, SH1, SH37A, SH33, SH51, SH25A, SH33, SH37A, SH44, SH45, SH33, SH37A, SH70, SH51, SH9A SH9A SH51, SH70 6 Design Speed, Kmph 120 120 120 7 Lane Configuration 6 lane / 8 Lane Access Controlled 8 Right of Way, m 100 100 100 9 Approx Travel Time (Hrs/Mins) 3 hrs 45 Mins 3 hrs 36 Mins 3 hrs 43 Mins 10 No of NH crossings 4 5 6 11 No of SH crossings 11 11 12 12 Access Control Access Control Expressway MJB 22 MJB 16 MJB 24 MNB 75 MNB 80 MNB 88 FLYOVER 11 FLYOVER 10 FLYOVER 12 INTERCHANGE 10 INTERCHANGE 10 INTERCHANGE 11 13 Number of structures VUP 25 VUP 35 SVUP 158 LVUP 84 LVUP 97 LVUP 82 ROB 9 ROB 7 ROB 6 Viaduct 1 Viaduct 1 Viaduct 1 Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder Routes (Expressway) to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana (Lot-4/Pkg-4) Alternative Option Analysis S. No Description Option I Option II Option III Tunnel 2 Tunnel 3 Tunnel 2 Number of settlements shall 14 28 21 11 be affected 15 Affected Forest Area (Ha) 370.49 443.98 207.23 Ranthambore Tiger Reserve, Ranthambore Tiger Reserve, Ranthambore Tiger Reserve, National Chambal Sanctuary, National Chambal Sanctuary, National Chambal Sanctuary, 16 Eco-sensitive/Protected Area Mukundra Hills National Park, Mukundra Hills National Park, Mukundra Hills National Park, Mukundra Tiger Reserve, Darrah Mukundra Tiger Reserve, Darrah Mukundra Tiger Reserve, Darrah WLS WLS WLS 1. Alignment is passing about 12.90 km & 10.58 km away from Ranthamabore National Park and 1. Passing through the agricultural and barren land Sawaimadhopur WLS respectively. 2. Alignment avoids the Amli Tiger Safari. 2. This Option is having the shortest 2. The forest area is less than 3. The forest area is least affected length and hence would require the Option 2. in this Option. shortest travel time. 17 Merits 4. Better connectivity to major towns through spurs at Alwar utilizing existing SH-18 & NH- 248A. 5. This option deletes the requirement of another expressway from Delhi to Jaipur. 6. Minimum number of settlements affected by this Option. 1. Alignment traverses through the Amli Tiger Safari which is being built by 1. LA cost is higher than other 18 Demerits the state government and hence would not be allowed to be constructed. Options as major development Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder Routes (Expressway) to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana (Lot-4/Pkg-4) Alternative Option Analysis S. No Description Option I Option II Option III exist near alignment. 2. Alignment traverses within 550 m 2. Alignment traverses within 5.7 km & 2.5 km from Sawai Madhopur & 8.2 Km Sawai Madhopur WLS and WLS and Ranthambore National Ranthambore National Park Park respectively. respectively. 3. The option traverses at a 3. Alignment is traversing Adjacent significant distance from to the Ranthambore National Park & Dausa/Jaipur thus not reducing the Tiger Reserve for significant length. travel time to Jaipur from Delhi with respect to NH48. 4. The option traverses at a significant distance from Dausa/Jaipur thus not reducing the travel time to Jaipur from Delhi with respect to NH48. Option III is best suitable due to following reasons:- Minimum Forest Land Involved Better connectivity to major towns Alwar, Dausa, Sawai Madhopur and Kota in the state of Rajasthan. Avoided Amli Tiger Safari, which is being developed by State Govt to conserve Tiger population. Having significant distance (>10km) from Ranthambore National Park and Sawai Madhopur WLS as compared to other options. However, the boundary National Chambal Sanctuary falls with 1.5 km away from start point of the project as this river is likely to be crossed for contiguous connectivity from present section to the next section. Minimum number of habitations and structures affected. Greenfield highway intends to connect industrial area and special economic zones of Rajasthan state. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economics of Milk Production in Alwar District (Rajasthan): a Comparative Analysis
    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 2, Issue 8, August 2012 1 ISSN 2250-3153 Economics of Milk Production in Alwar District (Rajasthan): A Comparative Analysis G. L. Meena* and D. K. Jain** * Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, MPUAT, Udaipur (Rajasthan) ** Division of Dairy Economics, Statistics and Management, NDRI, Karnal (Haryana) Abstract- This study covered 75 cooperative member milk 1. To compare the cost and return of milk production producers and 75 non-member milk producers which were post- among different herd size categories of households stratified into small, medium and large herd size categories. Per across member and non-member in different seasons. day net maintenance cost was found to be higher for member 2. To compare the production, consumption and marketed group than that of non-member group. It was found to be higher surplus of milk among different herd size categories of in case of buffalo than that of cow and also observed more in the households across member and non-member in different summer season. Per litre cost of buffalo and cow milk production seasons. was observed to be higher for the non-member as compared to member group. Per litre cost of buffalo milk production decreased with increase in herd size categories across different II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE seasons while same trend was not observed in case of cow milk Attempts have been made to review briefly the specific and production. Further, it was found higher in summer season. Daily relevant literature, which has direct or indirect bearing on the net return was found relatively higher in member group as objectives of the present study.
    [Show full text]
  • Rajasthan NAMP ARCGIS
    Status of NAMP Station (Rajasthan) Based on Air Quality Index Year 2010 ± Sriganganager Hanumangarh Churu Bikaner Jhunjhunu 219 373 *# Alwar(! Sikar 274 273 372 297 *# *# 409 *# Jaisalmer *# (! Bharatpur Nagaur 408 376 410 411 *# Dausa *# *# *#Jaipur 296 Jodhpur 298 412 *# (! 413 *# Dholpur *# Karauli Ajmer Sawai Madhopur Tonk Barmer Pali Bhilwara Bundi *#326 Jalor Kota# Rajsamand Chittorgarh * 325 17 Baran Sirohi *#321 *# 294 320Udaipurjk jk Jhalawar Station City Location code Area 372 Regional Office,RSPCB Residential Dungarpur Alwar 373 M/s Gourav Solvex Ltd Industrial Banswara 219 RIICO Pump House MIA Industrial 274 Regional Office, Jodhpur Industrial 273 Sojati Gate Residential 376 Mahamandir Police Thana Residential Jodhpur 411 Housing Board Residential 413 DIC Office Industrial AQI Based Pollution Categories 412 Shastri Nagar Residential 321 Regional Office MIA, Udaipur Industrial Udaipur 320 Ambamata, Udaipur (Chandpur Sattllite Hospital) Residential *# Moderate 294 Town Hall, Udaipur Residential 17 Regional Office, Kota Industrial Poor Kota 325 M/s Samcore Glass Ltd Industrial (! 326 Municipal Corporation Building, Kota Residential Satisfactory 298 RSPCB Office, Jhalana Doongari Residential jk 410 RIICO Office MIA, Jaipur Industrial 296 PHD Office, Ajmeri Gate Residential Jaipur 408 Office of the District Educational Officer, Chandpole Residential 409 Regional Office North, RSPCB,6/244 Vidyadhar Nagar Residential 297 VKIA, Jaipur (Road no.-6) Industrial Status of NAMP Station (Rajasthan) Based on Air Quality Index Year 2011 ±
    [Show full text]
  • Sharma, V. & Sankhala, K. 1984. Vanishing Cats of Rajasthan. J in Jackson, P
    Sharma, V. & Sankhala, K. 1984. Vanishing Cats of Rajasthan. J In Jackson, P. (Ed). Proceedings from the Cat Specialist Group meeting in Kanha National Park. p. 116-135. Keywords: 4Asia/4IN/Acinonyx jubatus/caracal/Caracal caracal/cats/cheetah/desert cat/ distribution/felidae/felids/Felis chaus/Felis silvestris ornata/fishing cat/habitat/jungle cat/ lesser cats/observation/Prionailurus viverrinus/Rajasthan/reintroduction/status 22 117 VANISHING CATS OF RAJASTHAN Vishnu Sharma Conservator of Forests Wildlife, Rajasthan Kailash Sankhala Ex-Chief Wildlife Warden, Rajasthan Summary The present study of the ecological status of the lesser cats of Rajasthan is a rapid survey. It gives broad indications of the position of fishing cats, caracals, desert cats and jungle cats. Less than ten fishing cats have been reported from Bharatpur. This is the only locality where fishing cats have been seen. Caracals are known to occur locally in Sariska in Alwar, Ranthambore in Sawaimadhopur, Pali and Doongargarh in Bikaner district. Their number is estimated to be less than fifty. Desert cats are thinly distributed over entire desert range receiving less than 60 cm rainfall. Their number may not be more than 500. Jungle cats are still found all over the State except in extremely arid zone receiving less than 20 cms of rainfall. An intelligent estimate places their population around 2000. The study reveals that the Indian hunting cheetah did not exist in Rajasthan even during the last century when ecological conditions were more favourable than they are even today in Africa. The cats are important in the ecological chain specially in controlling the population of rodent pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Census Atlas, Part IX-B, Vol-XIV, Rajasthan
    PRG. 173 B (N) (Ordy.) 1,000 CENSUS OF INDIA 1961 VOLUME XIV RAJASTHAN PART IX-B CENSUS ATLAS C. S. GUPTA OF THE INDIAN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE Superintendent of Census Op~rations, RajalJhan 1969 FOREWORD FEW PEOPLE REALIZE, much less appreciate, that apart from the Survey of India and the Geological Survey, the Census of India had' been perhaps the largest single producer of maps of the Indian subcontinent. Intimate collaboration between geographer and demographer began quite early in the modern era, almost two centuries before the first experiments in a permanent decennial Census were made in the 1850's. For example, the population estimates of Fort St. George, Madras, made in 1639 and 1648, and of Masulipatnam and Bombay by Dr. John Fryer, around 1672-73 were supported by cartographic documents of no mean order, Tbe first detailed modern maps, the results of Major James Rennell's stupendous Survey of 1767-74, were published in 1778-1780 and Henry Taylor Colebrooke, almost our first systematic demographer, was quick to make good use of them by making estimates of population in the East India Company's Possessions in the 1780's. Upjohn's map of Calcutta City, drawn in 1792.93, reprinted in the Census Report of Calcutta for 195 I, gives an idea of the standards of cartographic excellence reached at that period. In the first decade of the nineteenth century, Francis Buchanan Hamilton improved upon Colebrooke's method in which he was undoubtedly helped by the improved maps prepared for the areas he surve ed. It is possible that the Great Revenue Survey, begun in the middle of the last century, offered the best guarantee of the success of decennial population censuses proposed shortly before the Mutiny of 1857.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background of Ground Water Exploitation / Exploration
    GROUNDWATER EXPLORATION AND AUGMENTATION EFFORTS IN RAJASTHAN - A REVIEW - M.S. RATHORE INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES 8–B, Jhalana Institutional Area Jaipur– 302 004 February, 2005 1 Table of Contents SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................. 4 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND......................................................................................................................... 4 CATEGORIZATION OF AREAS FOR GROUNDWATER DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................... 6 Safe areas with potential for development..................................................................................................... 6 Semi-critical areas for cautious groundwater development.......................................................................... 6 Critical areas................................................................................................................................................. 6 Over-exploited areas ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Stage of groundwater
    [Show full text]
  • District Boundary Assembly Constituency
    NEW ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES (Based on Rajasthan Gazette Notification SADULSHAHAR-1 Dated 25th January, 2006) GANGANAGAR-2 SANGARIA-7 KARANPUR-3 RAJASTHAN PILIBANGA (SC)-9 HANUMANGARH- 8 GANGANAGAR RAISINGHNAGAR (SC)-5 SURATGARH-4 HANUMANGARH BHADRA-11 NOHAR-10 ® ANUPGARH (SC)-6 TARANAGAR-20 LUNKARANSAR-16 SADULPUR-19 KHAJUWALA SARDARSHAHAR-21 (SC)-12 CHURU PILANI CHURU-22 (SC)-25 BIKANER MANDAWA-28 SURAJGARH-26 JHUNJHUNUN-27 TIJARA-59 JHUNJHUNUN DUNGARGARH-17 BIKANER FATEHPUR-32 WEST-13 KHETRI-31 BEHROR- BIKANER RATANGARH-23 EAST-14 NAWALGARH- 62 MUNDAWAR- 61 29 KISHANGARH KOLAYAT-15 UDAIPURWATI- BAS-60 LACHHMANGARH-33 30 NEEM KA THANA-38 KAMAN-70 SUJANGARH KOTPUTLI-40 (SC)-24 SIKAR-35 BANSUR-63 KHANDELA-37 ALWAR LADNUN- URBAN-66 RAMGARH-67 NOKHA-18 106 DHOD (SC)-34 SIKAR SRIMADHOPUR-39 ALWAR NAGAR-71 ALWAR VIRATNAGAR-41 RURAL (SC)-65 DEEG - DANTA KUMHER-72 RAMGARH-36 KATHUMAR DEEDWANA-107 SHAHPURA-42 PHALODI-122 (SC)-69 JAYAL RAJGARH - (SC)-108 BHARATPUR- NAGAUR- CHOMU-43 THANAGAZI-64 LAXMANGARH (ST)-68 73 109 NADBAI-74 NAWAN- JAISALMER- 115 JAMWA BHARATPUR 132 AMBER-47 MAHUWA-86 NAGAUR MAKRANA- RAMGARH BANDIKUI-85 WEIR 113 (ST)-48 (SC)-75 JAISALMER KHINVSAR-110 JHOTWARA-46 JAIPUR DAUSA- LOHAWAT-123 BAYANA POKARAN- ADARSH 88 NAGAR-53 DAUSA (SC)-76 133 PHULERA-44 SIKRAI RAJAKHERA-80 DEGANA- (SC)-87 HINDAUN 112 PARBATSAR- BASSI (SC)-82 BAGRU 114 (ST)-57 PUSHKAR- (SC)-56 TODABHIM DHOLPUR- JODHPUR 99 (ST)-81 DHAULPUR 79 OSIAN- DUDU BARI-78 125 (SC)-45 CHAKSU KARAULI-83 MERTA (SC)-58 LALSOT BAMANWAS BASERI BHOPALGARH (SC)-111 (ST)-89 (SC)-126
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Beds at Level 3 MCH Centers Total S.N
    Status of Beds at Level 3 MCH Centers Total S.N. District MCH Centers L3 No. of Beds FRU 1 Ajmer 7 A K Hospital, Beawer District Hosp 300 Satellite District Hospital, Ajmer 30 Population SDH - Govt. Hospital, Nasirabad 100 2664100 SDH- Y N Hospital, Kishangarh 150 CHC KEKRI 100 CHC PISANGAN 30 CHC VIJAY NAGAR 30 2 Alwar 8 General Hospital, Alwar District Hosp 332 NIPI CHC TIJARA 30 CHC RAJGARH 50 36 LAKH CHC KISHANGARH BAS 50 CHC BEHROD 50 CHC BANSUR 30 CHC KERLIMANDI 30 CHC KOTKASIM 30 3 Banswara 4 M G Hospital, Banswara District Hosp 300 UNFPA CHC KUSHALGARH 50 1629900 CHC PARTAPUR 30 CHC BAGIDORA 30 4 Baran 4 Govt. Hospital, Baran District Hosp 300 UNICEF CHC CHIPABAROD 30 1245200 CHC CHHABRA 50 CHC KELWARA 30 5 Barmer 5 General Hospital, Barmer District Hosp 200 UNICEF SDH - General Hospital, Balotra 150 2404500 CHC BAYTU 30 CHC GADRAROAD 30 CHC DHORIMANNA 30 6 Bharatpur 6 RajBahadur Memorial Govt. D. Hospital 300 NIPI CHC DEEG 50 2572800 CHC KAMAN 30 CHC NAGAR 30 CHC BAYANA 50 CHC RUPBAS 30 7 Bhilwara 6 M G Hospital, Bhilwara District Hosp 400 Satellite Hospital, Shahpura 50 2453200 CHC RAIPUR 30 CHC GULABPURA 50 CHC GANGAPUR 50 CHC MANDALGARH 50 8 Bikaner 5 Satellite District Hospital, Bikaner 100 CHC NOKHA 50 2322600 CHC DUNGARGARH 30 CHC LUNKARANSAR 30 CHC KOLAYAT 30 9 Bundi 3 General District Hospital, Bundi 300 1170100 CHC KAPREN 30 CHC NAINWA 50 Total S.N. District MCH Centers L3 No. of Beds FRU 10 Chittorgarh 5 District Hospital, Chittorgarh 300 1629900 CHC BEGUN 50 CHC KAPASAN 50 CHC BADISADRI 50 CHC NIMBAHERA 100 11 Churu 5 D B Hospital, Churu District Hospital 225 2059300 SDH - S R J Hospital, Ratangarh 100 SDH - S B Hospital, Sujangarh 100 CHC RAJGARH 50 CHC SARDARSHAHAR 75 12 Dausa 3 District Hospital, Dausa 150 NIPI CHC LALSOT 30 1606100 CHC MAHUWA 30 13 Dholpur 4 Sadar District Hospital, Dholpur 300 1196300 CHC RAJAKHERA 30 CHC BARI 50 CHC BASERI 30 14 Dungarpur 4 General District Hospital, Dungarpur 300 UNICEF SDH - Govt.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Population Figures, Series-18, Rajasthan
    PAPER 1 OF 1982 CENSUS OF INDIA 1981 SERIES 18 RAJASTHAN fINAL POPULATION FIGU~ES (TOTAL POPULATION, SCHEDULED CASTE POPULATION AND .sCHEDULED TRIBE POPULATION) I. C. SRIVASTAVA ·1)f the Indian Administrative Service Director of Census Operations Rajasthan INTRODUCfION The final figures of total population, scheduled caste and scheduled tribe population of Rajasthan Stat~ are now ready for release at State/District/Town and Tehsil levels. This Primary Census Abs­ tract, as it is called, as against the provisional figures contained in our three publications viz. Paper I, fFacts & Figures' and Supplement to Paper-I has been prepared through manual tabulation by over 1400 census officials including Tabulators, Checkers and Supervisors whose constant and sustained efforts spread over twelve months enabled the Directorate to complete the work as per the schedule prescribed at the national level. As it will take a few months more to publish the final population figures at the viJ1age as well as ward levels in towns in the form of District Census Handbooks, it is hoped, this paper will meet the most essential and immediate demands of various Government departments, autonomous bodies, Cor­ porations, Universities and rtsearch institutions in relation to salient popUlation statistics of the State. In respect of 11 cities with One lac or more population, it has also been possible to present ~the data by municipal wards as shown in Annexure. With compliments from Director of Census Operations, Rajasthan CONTENTS INTRODUCTION (iii) Total Population, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribt' Population by Districts, 1981 Total Schedu1ed Caste and Scheduled Tribe Population. ( vi) 1. Ganganagar District 1 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Rajasthan Department of Women & Child Development
    GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN & CHILD DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORATE OF WOMEN EMPOWERMENT Implementation of Protection of Women against Domestic Voilecne Act, 2005 1- Name of the State - RAJASTHAN 2- No. of Districts - 33 3- No. of Protection Officers appointed - 548 4- Details of Protection Officer- List enclosed LIST OF PROTECTION OFFICERS & SERVICE PROVIDERS UNDER THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 A) Protection Officers STATE-RAJASTHAN DISTRICT-AJMER Sr.No Name & address with contact numbers Designation 1 Shri S.D. Gaur, DD, ICDS, Women & Child Development, Ajmer (T) 0145-2627154 DD 2 Smt Kumudani Sharma, CDPO Office, Ajmer City, (R) 0145-2426452 (O) 0145-2620582 CDPO 3 Smt. Mithlesh Jain, CDPO Office, Kishangarh Rural, Ajmer (M) 9928266768 CDPO 4 Smt. Mithlesh Jain, CDPO Office, Arai, Ajmer (M) 9928266768 CDPO (Addl. Charge) 5 Shri Deepak Sharma, CDPO Office, Byvar City, Ajmer (M) 9928070768 CDPO 6 Shri Vinay Chandra Jain, CDPO Office, Kekari, Ajmer (M) 9351454499 CDPO 7 Smt. Asha Sharma, CDPO Office, Pisagan, Ajmer (M) 9414708211 CDPO 8 Smt. Geeta Sharma, CDPO Office, Jawaja, Ajmer (M) 9982591310 CDPO 9 Shri Vijay Chandra Chandra Jain, CDPO Office, Kishangarh City, Ajmer (M) 9351454499 CDPO 10 Smt. Saroj Chaturvedi, CDPO Office, Srinagar, Ajmer (M) 9460932605 CDPO 11 Smt. Ashu Choudhary, CDPO Office, Masuda, Ajmer Addl. Charge 12 Shri Vijay Chandra Jain, CDPO Office, Bhinai, Ajmer (M) 9351454499 CDPO 13 Smt. Krishna Sharma, CDPO Office, Masuda, Ajmer (M) 9460203200 Pracheta 14 Smt. Uschav Sharma, CDPO, Office, Arai, Ajmer (M) 9460150630 Pracheta 15 Miss Aruna Gupta, CDPO Office, Srinagar, Ajmer, (M) 9414281364 Pracheta 16 Smt.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2017 May 2017
    RAJASTHAN ROYAL HERITAGE MAY 2017 (As of 25 May 2017) For updated information, please visit www.ibef.org 1 RAJASTHAN ROYAL HERITAGE ❖ Executive Summary……………………. 3 ❖ Vision ……………………………………. 4 ❖ Advantage State…………………….…... 5 ❖ Rajasthan – An Introduction……….…...6 ❖ Rajasthan Budget……………………...18 ❖ Infrastructure Status…………..……….19 ❖ Business Opportunities…………....…. 44 ❖ Doing Business in Rajasthan……..…. 75 ❖ State Acts & Policies……….…....…… 76 MAY 2017 For updated information, please visit www.ibef.org 2 RAJASTHAN ROYAL HERITAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Tourist arrivals in the state, during 2015-16 (up to December 2015), reached 36.66 million. Thriving tourism Historic palaces, especially those in Jaipur and Udaipur, offer opportunities to expand the industry luxury tourism segment, with increasing number of tourists visiting wild life sanctuaries and desert locations. • Rajasthan is the largest producer of oilseeds, seed spices & coarse cereals in India. Leading producer of Tremendous opportunities exist in the areas of organic and contract farming as well as in agro-based products infrastructure developments related to agriculture. • The state has immense potential for electricity generation through renewable energy Focus on renewable sources and wind power. Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Ltd has actively energy promoted solar energy and biomass projects. Strong economic growth • Rajasthan’s gross state domestic product (GSDP) expanded at a CAGR of 12.32% over 2005-06 to 2015-16. • The policy environment has been favourable for the establishment of industrial units. A Conducive policy Single Window Clearance System (SWCS) for investment approvals is operational in the environment state and the Bureau of Investment Promotion (BIP) was set up to focus on investments above US$ 2.2 million. • Rajasthan is the 2nd largest producer of crude oil in India, recording production of One of the largest approximately 90 lakh tonnes of oil per annum, which is nearly 24 per cent of the total producers of crude oil domestic crude oil production in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • RAJASTHAN STATE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.Pdf
    STATE DISTRICT BRANCH ADDRESS CENTRE IFSC CONTACT1 CONTACT2 CONTACT3 MICR_CODE Ajmer Central Co- RAJASTHA operative Bank Khailand Market Ajmer 998322870 N AJMER Ltd, Ajmer Pin Code No 305001 AJMER RSCB0011002 1 0145-2423742 305501002 Ajmer Central Co- RAJASTHA operative Bank PB156 Ajmer Pin Code 963634725 N AJMER Ltd, Ajmer No 305001 AJMER RSCB0011001 2 0145-2627396 305501001 Ajmer Central Co- Near Bus Stand Road RAJASTHA operative Bank Pisangan Pin Code No 998322875 N AJMER Ltd, Ajmer 305201 PISANGAN RSCB0011011 8 0145-2775234 305501031 AJMER CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD., HEAD OFFICE, Ajmer Central Co- JAIPUR ROAD, PB156 RAJASTHA operative Bank Ajmer Pin Code No 998332371 N AJMER Ltd, Ajmer 305001 AJMER RSCB0011099 9 0145-2431613 305501000 Krshi Mandi- SUBHASH GANJ Ajmer Central Co- ANAJ RAJASTHA operative Bank MANDI,Nasirabad Pin 964990510 N AJMER Ltd, Ajmer Code No 305601 NASIRABAD RSCB0011010 5 01491-220057 305501030 Ajmer Central Co- Nagar Palika Bulding RAJASTHA operative Bank Pushkar Pin Code No 998322875 N AJMER Ltd, Ajmer 305022 PUSHKAR RSCB0011012 5 0145-2772007 305501032 Ajmer Central Co- Near Bus Stand RAJASTHA operative Bank Masuda Pin Code No 998322863 N AJMER Ltd, Ajmer 305623 MASUDA RSCB0011009 5 01462-266908 305501029 Ajmer Central Co- Near Bus Stand RAJASTHA operative Bank Kishangarh Pin Code KISHANGAR 998322873 N AJMER Ltd, Ajmer No 305801 H RSCB0011008 1 01463-246595 305501028 Ajmer Central Co- Opp.Nagar palika , RAJASTHA operative Bank Near Polic Thana Kekri 998322872 N AJMER Ltd, Ajmer Pin Code No 305404 KEKRI RSCB0011007 1 01467-220046 305501075 Ajmer Central Co- Krshi Mandi Samiti RAJASTHA operative Bank Bijaynager Pin Code 998322871 N AJMER Ltd, Ajmer No 305624 BIJAINAGAR RSCB0011006 0 01462-230060 305501050 NEAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, Ajmer Central Co- opp.
    [Show full text]
  • Dausa District
    Dausa District ` Hydrogeological Atlas of Rajasthan Dausa District Contents: List of Plates Title Page No. Plate I Administrative Map 2 Plate II Topography 4 Plate III Rainfall Distribution 4 Plate IV Geological Map 6 Plate V Geomorphological Map 6 Plate VI Aquifer Map 8 Plate VII Stage of Ground Water Development (Block wise) 2011 8 Location of Exploratory and Ground Water Monitoring Plate VIII 10 Stations Depth to Water Level Plate IX 10 (Pre-Monsoon 2010) Water Table Elevation Plate X 12 (Pre-Monsoon 2010) Water Level Fluctuation Plate XI 12 (Pre-Post Monsoon 2010) Electrical Conductivity Distribution Plate XII 14 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Chloride Distribution Plate XIII 14 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Fluoride Distribution Plate XIV 16 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Nitrate Distribution Plate XV 16 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Plate XVI Depth to Bedrock 18 Plate XVII Map of Unconfined Aquifer 18 Glossary of terms 19 2013 ADMINISTRATIVE SETUP DISTRICT – DAUSA Location: Dausa district is located in the eastern part of Rajasthan. It is bounded in the north by Alwar district, in the east Bharatpur district, south by SawaiMadhopur and Karauli districts and Jaipur district in the west. It stretches between 26⁰ 22' 13.32” to 27⁰ 14' 33.58” north latitude and 76⁰ 08' 32.62’’ to 77⁰ 05' 00.41’’ east longitude covering area of 3,417.7 sq km. The district is drained by three important rivers and the district falls within the three corresponding river basins namely ‘Banganga River Basin’ in northern part, ‘Banas River Basin’ in southern part, and ‘Gambhir River Basin’ is in lower eastern part.
    [Show full text]