4th HALF YEARLY MONITORING REPORT OF CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION AND STUDIES (CDECS) ON MDM FOR THE STATE OF

FOR THE PERIOD OF 1st April, 2012 to 30 th September, 2012

DISTRICTS COVERED

1. SriGanganagar 2.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page1 FOREWORD

MDM being one of the flagship programmes taken up by Government of with support from State Governments has addressed this fundamental problem by implementing school Mid day Meal program that provides children with at least one nutritionally adequate meal a day. Nutrition support to primary education is considered as a means to achieve the objective of providing free and compulsory universal primary education of satisfactory quality to all the children below the age of 14 years by giving a boost to Universalization of Elementary Education through increased enrollment, improved school attendance and retention and promoting nutritional status of elementary school children simultaneously. School meal programme also provides parents with a strong incentive to send children to school, thereby encouraging enrollment and reducing absenteeism and drop-out rates. School meal programme support health, nutrition, and education goals and consequently, have a multi-pronged impact on a nation’s overall social and economic development.

Mid-day Meal is a popular National Flagship educational programme of our country, with the provision of cooked lunch free of cost to school-children on all school days. During the last 6 to 7 years, various kinds of activities have been conducted under this programme through out the country and every year the progress and problems relating to implementation of this programme have been analyzed and reviewed at National level allocated with some grants and manpower to conduct the programme related activities with more vigour and enthusiasm. But what have been achieved out of those elaborate, exhaustive programme activities? It is required to examine the progress of this programme. The Government of India, (its Ministry of Human Resource Development) has, therefore, intended to gather data on progress of the programme through a detailed monitoring of some sample districts during the period from 1.04.2012 to 30.09.2012 (six months). The monitoring Team of our organization has been set up under the leadership of Dr. Upendra K. Singh who has prepared this report after collating the relevant data obtained through their monitoring visits to sample schools of 02 Districts (SriGanganagar & Alwar).

I would appreciate the genuine efforts of Dr. Singh and his team who could prepare the report within the time assigned by the Government of India. I hope the findings of the report would be helpful to the Government of India and the MDM department, and District Project Office team to understand the grassroots level achievements and present system of operation of the programme and accordingly, take measures to improve the overall functioning of the programme to achieve the major goals. Our team also tried to have supportive role in the process, especially of the district officials so that they feel motivated and empowered towards the MDM/SSA in the district with the positive and critical inputs from the MI.

Chairman,

CDECS, Rajasthan

25 September, 2012

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The 4th Half Yearly Monitoring report has been prepared for the State of Rajasthan revealing the progress of the Mid Day Meal (MDM) in Rajasthan from 1.04.2012 to 30.09.2012 . The facts giving details of implementation of the MDM have been examined and analyzed, especially pertaining to the progress made by the Districts of Ganganagar & Alwar. The empirical data have been obtained from the sample respondents like teachers, community leaders, parents, students, etc.

This report is an outcome of the kind cooperation of the following persons to whom we acknowledge our gratefulness.

1. Ms. Aparna Arora, IAS, Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, GOR

2. Mr. L.C. Auswal, RAS, Commissioner, Mid Day Meal department, GOR

3. Mr. Devkinandan Sharma, Deputy Commissioner, MDM, GOR

We also express our thanks to all our sample respondents, who have extended their cooperation to us without any hesitation during monitoring work.

Our Special thanks to Ms. Anshu Vaishya, IAS, Secretary, Department of Education & Literacy, Ministry of HRD, GOI and Mr. Amarjeet Singh, IAS, Joint Secretary, MDM for their deep concern for the task of MI and also their support in order to complete the monitoring in the districts of the State of Rajasthan.

We express our deep sense of gratitude to Mr.Gaya Prashad, Director, MDM, for time to time guidance in undertaking the monitoring activities in Rajasthan State. We owe our gratitude to officials of MDM Department who were kind enough to share various provisions and processes about the MDM time to time.

We express our deep sense of gratitude to Mr. Mridula Sarkar & Mr. Bhupendra Singh, Senior Consultant (Monitoring) MDM, Technical Support Group (TSG), EDCIL, New who have continuously supported us at every stage of this monitoring work.

Our thanks are also due to the whole team of CDECS for their patience and hard work which really helped in bringing out this report.

We hope that the findings of this report will be useful to various people concerned with funding, planning, implementation and research on MDM in the State of Rajasthan.

Dr. Upendra K. Singh Nodal Officer, CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION AND STUDIES (CDECS) 25 September, 2012 , Rajasthan CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page3

Contents S. Particulars Page Number No. 1. Foreword 2 2. Acknowledgement 3 3. General Information 5-7 4. Consolidated Report for the districts of 8-11 SriGanganagar & Alwar in the State of Rajasthan for the period - 1st APRIL, 2012 TO 30 th SEPTEMBER, 2012 5. 4th Half Yearly Monitoring Report of MDM of 12-26 District-1 – SriGanganagar 6. 4th Half Yearly Monitoring Report of MDM of 27-41 District-2 – Alwar

Annexure List of Abbreviations 42 List of Schools - SriGanganagar district 43 List of Schools - 44 List of Schools showing gap in data 45-46 Letter of Commisionerate, MDM Rajasthan on draft report

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page4 4th HALF YEARLY MONITORING REPORT OF CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION AND STUDIES (CDECS) ON MID- DAY MEAL (MDM) FOR THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN FOR THE PERIOD OF 1st APRIL, 2012 TO 30th SEPTEMBER, 2012

1. General Information

S. Information Details Number 1st APRIL, 2012 TO 30 th SEPTEMBER, 2012 1. Period of the report

2. Number of Districts allotted 02

3. Districts’ name SriGanganagar & Alwar

Month of visit to the Districts / District-1(SriGanganagar )- 15th August, Schools 2012 to 19 September, 2012 4. (Information is to be given district- District-2(Alwar)- 15th August, 2012 to 19 wise September, 2012 i.e. District 1, District 2, etc.)

Total number of elementary schools District-1 SriGanganagar –PS-1154 and (primary and upper primary to be UPS-759 5. counted separately) in the Districts District-2 Alwar - PS 1707 and UPS-1247 covered by MI

Number of elementary schools District- SriGanganagar - PS -09; UPS-23, monitored (primary and upper KGBV-02, STCs-06 primary to be counted separately) 6. District- Alwar - PS -16; UPS-18, KGBV- Information is to be given district- 04, STCs-02 wise i.e. District 1, District 2, District 3 etc)

7. Types of schools visited

District-1(SriGanganagar)- 06 a) Special training centres (STC) District-2(Alwar) – 02

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page5 District-1(SriGanganagar)- 10 c) Schools in Urban Areas District-2(Alwar) - 09

District-1(SriGanganagar)- 06 d) Schools sanctioned with Civil Works District-2(Alwar) -06

District-1(SriGanganagar)- 03 e) Schools from NPEGEL Blocks District-2(Alwar) -03

District-1(SriGanganagar)- 07 f) Schools having CWSN District-2(Alwar) - 05

Schools covered under CAL District-1(SriGanganagar)- 10 g) programme District-2 (Alwar) - 06

District-1(SriGanganagar)- 02 h) KGBVs District-2 (Alwar) - 04

Number of schools visited by Nodal District-1(SriGanganagar)- 14 8. Officer of the Monitoring Institute District-2 (Alwar) – 12

Whether the draft report has been Yes 9. shared with the SPO : YES / NO

After submission of the draft report Yes to the SPO whether the MI has 10. received any comments from the SPO: YES / NO

Before sending the reports to the Yes 11. GOI whether the MI has shared the report with SPO: YES / NO

Before taking up the field level study we had discussions with State Officials, namely SPD & Commissioner, Deputy Director (Monitoring). The State team Details regarding discussion held helped us by intimating the district about 12. with State officials the monitoring and visit date. They also instructed the district for necessary support as per the GOI letter and requirement.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page6 The selection of sample schools was done as per the TOR of Ministry of HRD. In total, 40 Schools of various categories have been selected. The purposive sampling technique and stratified sampling technique have been used. Thus, through random sampling 13. Selection Criteria for Schools technique the sample schools have been selected. The district and Block officials were also involved. The Schools visited under MDM were the same which were the sample of SSA. In case of MDM, the schools were the sample schools where MDM was operational.

Items to be attached with the 14. report:

A. List of Schools with DISE Yes code visited by MI. (still some schools do not know their DISE code it is filled at Block level)

B. Copy of Office order, Yes notification etc. discussed in the report.

C. District Summary of the Yes school reports

D. Any other relevant documents. Yes

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page7 Consolidated Report of Mid Day Meal for the districts of SriGanganagar & Alwar in Rajasthan for the period of 1st APRIL, 2012 to 30 th SEPTEMBER, 2012

District 1: (a) Regularity in serving MDM: Out of 32 sample schools (SriGanganagar) visited by MI for MDM, in all the 32 sample schools (100%) hot cooked meal was served daily. Thus, all the sample schools visited by MI served hot cooked meal daily to children and there was no disruption in serving hot cooked meal daily to school children.

(b) Regularity in delivering food grains to Schools: Out of 32 schools monitored by MI for MDM, in 30 schools (94%) food grain was available for MDM regularly, whereas in 02 schools (6%) food grain was not available for MDM. Out of 30 schools where regular food grain for MDM was available, food grain stock of one month for MDM was available in 29 schools (97%) and in 01 school (3%) food grain stock for one month for MDM was not available. Out of 32 schools where MDM was monitored by MI, 30 sample schools (100%) where food grains was available regularly for MDM, food grain for MDM was delivered at the school. Out of 32 schools where MDM was monitored by MI, in 06 schools (19%) quality of food grain was very good, in 19 schools (59%) the quality was good, whereas in 07 schools (22%) quality of food grain was average.

(c) Regularity in delivering cooking cost to Schools: In total, 16 schools (50%) out of 32 schools where MDM was monitored by MI received cooking cost regularly and in 16 schools (50%) cooking cost was not made available regularly. Out of them, in all the 16 schools (100%) cooking cost was not available for more than 30 days.

(d) Social Equity : In all the 32 schools (100%) monitored by MI for MDM, no discrimination (gender, caste and community) in cooking or serving or seating arrangements has been observed by MI.

(e) Variety of Menu: There were varieties in the food served for MDM. It includes Chapati & vegetables (seasonal fruit), Dal/vegetable& rice, khichdi, Dal and chapatti, Dal & bati, Chapati and vegetable.

(f) Quality and Quantity of MDM: In all the 32 sample schools (100%) checked by MI for MDM, the children were satisfied with the quality of meal. In 31 sample schools (97%) checked by MI for MDM, the children were satisfied with the quantity of meal, whereas in 01 school (3%) the children were not satisfied with the quantity of meal.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page8 (g) Supplementary diets: In 13 schools (41%) children were given micronutrients (Iron, folic acid, vitamin – A dosage) and de-worming medicine in the schools through Medical and Health Department, whereas in 19 schools (59%) children were not given micronutrients (Iron, folic acid, vitamin – A dosage) and de-worming medicine in the schools through Medical and Health Department.

(h) Status of Cook : In majority of schools adequate number of cooks and helpers were engaged for preparation of MDM. There was fixed honorarium of Rs. 1000 for cook. Thus, cooks were paid the amount for cooking MDM as per the provision.

(i) Infrastructure for MDM: Out of 32 sample schools checked by MI, pucca kitchen sheds-cum-stores were constructed and were in use in 25 schools (78%). Potable water for drinking and cooking was available in all the 32 sample schools (100%). Similarly, in all the 32 schools (100%) undertaken by MI for MDM have adequate number of utensils for cooking MDM.

(j) Community Participation: In 29 schools (91%) Community/Panchayats participated in supervision and monitoring of MDM. In case of participation of parents, it was reported in 30 schools (94%)

(k) Inspection and Supervision : Out of 32 sample schools checked by MI for MDM, only 01 school (3%) had been inspected by State level officials, 07 schools (22%) had been inspected by district level MDM officials; whereas 30 schools (94%) had been inspected by Block level officials.

(l) Impact : In 14 schools (44%) teachers / headmasters reported that MDM improved the enrollment, whereas in 23 schools (72%) teachers reported that MDM improved attendance of children in schools and in 24 schools (75%) teachers reported that MDM improved general well being (nutritional status) of children.

(a) Regularity in serving MDM: Out of 34 sample schools District 2 :(Alwar) visited by MI for MDM, in all the 34 sample schools (100%) hot cooked meal was served daily. Thus, all the sample schools visited by MI served hot cooked meal daily to children and there was no disruption in serving hot cooked meal daily to school children.

(b) Regularity in delivering food grains to Schools: Out of 34 schools monitored by MI for MDM, in 25 schools (100%) food grain was available for MDM. In 07 schools CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page9 MDM is supplied by agency () and in the remaining 02 schools MDM was supplied by SHG (Annapurna Sahkari Samiti). Out of 25 schools where food grain was available for MDM, regular supply of food grain for MDM was found in all the 25 sample schools (100%). Out of 25 schools where regular food grain for MDM was available, food grain stock of one month for MDM was available in 24 schools (96%) and in 01 school (4%) food grain stock for one month for MDM was not available. Out of 34 schools where MDM was monitored by MI, in all the 25 sample schools (100%) where MDM was prepared at schools, food grain for MDM was delivered at the school. In the remaining 09 schools MDM was prepared by NGO/SHG. Of the 25 schools where MDM was prepared at schools, in 04 schools (16%) quality of food grain was very good, in 13 schools (52%) the quality was good, whereas in 08 schools (32%) quality of food grain was average.

(c) Regularity in delivering cooking cost to Schools: In total, 04 schools (16%) out of 25 schools where MDM was prepared at schools received cooking cost regularly and in 21 schools (84%) cooking cost was not made available regularly. Out of them, in all the 21 schools (100%) cooking cost was not available for more than 30 days.

(d) Social Equity : In all the 34 schools (100%) monitored by MI for MDM, no discrimination (gender, caste and community) in cooking or serving or seating arrangements has been observed by MI.

(e) Variety of Menu: There were varieties in the food served for MDM. It included Chapatti & vegetables (seasonal fruit), Dal/vegetable& rice, khichdi, Dal and chapatti, Dal& bati, Chapatti and vegetable.

(f) Quality and Quantity of MDM: In 33 sample schools (97%) checked by MI for MDM, the children were satisfied with the quality of meal, whereas in 01 school (3%) the children were not satisfied with the quality of meal. In 31 sample schools (91%) checked by MI for MDM, the children were satisfied with the quantity of meal, whereas in 03 schools (9%) the children were not satisfied with the quantity of meal.

(g) Supplementary diets: In 18 schools (53%) children were given micronutrients (Iron, folic acid, vitamin – A dosage) and de-worming medicine in the schools through Medical and Health Department, whereas in 16 schools (47%) children were not given micronutrients (Iron, folic acid, vitamin – A dosage) and de-worming medicine in the schools through Medical and Health Department.

(h) Status of Cook : In majority of schools adequate CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page10 number of cooks and helpers were engaged for preparation of MDM. There was fixed honorarium of Rs 1000 for cook. Thus, cooks were paid the amount for cooking MDM as per the provision.

(i) Infrastructure for MDM: Out of 25 sample schools where MDM was prepared at school, pucca kitchen-sheds- cum-stores were constructed and were in use in 17 schools (68%).Potable water for drinking and cooking was available in 31 sample schools (97%). Similarly, all the 25 schools (100%) where MDM was prepared at school had adequate number of utensils for cooking MDM.

(j) Community Participation: In 29 schools (85%) Local community /Panchayats participated in supervision and monitoring of MDM. In case of participation of parents, it was reported in 30 schools (88%).

(k) Inspection and Supervision : Out of 34 sample schools checked by MI for MDM, only 01 school (3%) had been inspected by state level MDM officials, 07 schools (21%) had been inspected by district level MDM officials; whereas 33 schools (97%) had been inspected by block level officials.

(l) Impact (perception of teachers/ HM): In 19 schools (56%) teachers / headmasters reported that MDM improved the enrollment, whereas in 24 schools (71%) teachers reported that MDM improved attendance of children in schools and in 27 schools (79%) teachers reported that MDM improved general well being (nutritional status) of children.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page11 4th HALF YEARLY MONITORING REPORT OF CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION AND STUDIES (CDECS) ON MDM FOR THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN FOR THE PERIOD OF 1st April, 2012 TO 30 th September, 2012

FOR GANGANAGAR DISTRICT Name of the Monitoring Institution CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION & STUDIES (CDECS) st th Period of the report 1 April, 2012 to 30 September, 2012

Name of the District SriGanganagar

Date of visit to the 15 th August 2012 to 19 th Districts/EGS/Schools September 2012

1. REGULARITY IN SERVING MEAL Whether the school is serving hot cooked meal daily? If there was interruption, what was the extent and reasons for the same?

Out of 32 sample schools visited by MI for MDM, in all the 32 sample schools (100%) hot cooked meal was served daily. Thus, all the sample schools visited by MI served hot cooked meal daily to children and there was no disruption in serving hot cooked meal daily to school children. The same was also reported by Children taking MDM the school children. Table 1: Regularity in serving MDM

Number Percentage (%)

Yes 32 100

No 0 0

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page12 2. TRENDS

Extent of variation (As per school records vis-à-vis Actual on the day of visit)

No. Details On the day of visit

i Enrollment 4082 ii No. of children attending the 3191 school on the day of visit

Iii No. of children availing MDM as per 3172 MDM Register

Iv No. of children actually availing 3170 MDM on the day of visit v No. of children actually availing 3196 MDM on the previous day

3. REGULARITY IN DELIVERING FOOD GRAINS TO SCHOOL LEVEL (i) Is school receiving food grain regularly? If there is delay in delivering food grains, what is the extent of delay and reasons for the same?

Out of 32 schools monitored by MI for MDM, in 30 schools (94%) food grain was available for MDM regularly, whereas in 02 schools (6%) food grain was not available for MDM.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page13 Table 2: Food grain for MDM available regularly in Schools

Number Percentage (%)

Yes 30 94

No 02 6

(ii) Is Buffer stock of one-month’s requirement is maintained?

Out of 30 schools where regular food grain for MDM was available, food grain stock of one month for MDM was available in 29 schools (97%) and in 01 school (3%) food grain stock for one month for MDM was not available. Table 3: Buffer Stock of one-month’s requirement maintained

Number Percentage (%)

Yes 29 97

No 01 3

(iii) Is the food grains delivered at the school?

Out of 32 schools where MDM was monitored by MI, in 30 sample schools (100%) where food grain was available regularly for MDM, food grain for MDM was delivered at the school.

Table 4: Food grains delivered at Schools Number Percentage (%)

Yes 30 100

No 0 0

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page14 (iv) Quality of Food grains

Quality of Wheat Quality of Rice

Table 5: Quality of Food grains

Very good 06 19

Good 19 59

Average 07 22

Out of 32 schools where MDM was monitored by MI, in 06 schools (19%) quality of food grain was very good, in 19 schools (59%) the quality was good, whereas in 07 schools (22%) quality of food grain was average.

4. REGULARITY IN DELIVERING COOKING COST TO SCHOOL LEVEL (i) Is school receiving cooking cost in advance regularly? If there is delay in delivering cooking cost what is the extent of delay and reasons for it? In total, 16 schools (50%) out of 32 schools where MDM was monitored by MI received cooking cost regularly and in 16 schools (50%) cooking cost was not made available regularly. Out of them, in all the 16 schools (100%) cooking cost was not available for more than 30 days.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page15 As the cooking cost and food grains are supplied from district, the delay/ disruption in regular receipt of food grains and cooking cost is a district issue rather than a school issue. Hence, the district office has to review the matter and ensure the timely releases. Table 6: Regularity in delivering Cooking Cost Number Percentage (%)

Yes 16 50

No 16 50

(ii) In case of delay, how schools manage to ensure that there is no disruption in the feeding programme? The Schools and SHG arrange food materials and firewood on hired basis to manage MDM cooking. Sometimes, headmaster/teacher contributes for cooking cost or as per availability of funds in SMC account they use the money for some time for MDM, too.

(iii) Is cooking cost paid by Cash or through banking channel?

In all the 25 schools (100%) cooking cost is paid through bank electronic transfers directly into the account of SMC.

5. SOCIAL EQUITY (i) Did you observe any gender or caste or community discrimination in cooking or serving or seating arrangements?

In all the 32 schools (100%) monitored by MI for MDM, no discrimination (gender, caste and community) in cooking or serving or seating arrangements has been observed by MI.

Table 7: Gender/Caste/Community discrimination in Cooking/Serving/ Seating arrangements Number Percentage (%)

Yes 0 0

No 32 100

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page16 6. VARIETY OF MENU (i) Has the school displayed its weekly menu, and is it able to adhere to the menu displayed?

MDM Menu displayed

In 28 schools (87.5%) out of 32 sample schools checked by MI for MDM displayed their weekly menu, whereas 04 schools (12.5%) did not display MDM menu. Out of the total schools (28), where weekly menu was displayed, all the 28 schools (100%) adhered to the menu displayed. Table 8: School displayed its weekly Menu Number Percentage (%)

Yes 28 87.5

No 04 12.5

7. (ii) Is there variety in the food served or is the same food served daily? There was variety in the food served for MDM. This includes Chapatti & Vegetable (seasonal), Dal/vegetable & Rice, Khichdi, Dal and Chapatti, Dal, Chapatti and vegetable. Also, weekly fruits were served under MDM in the schools.

(iii) Does the daily menu include rice / wheat preparation, dal and vegetables?

Daily menu includes rice / wheat preparation (includes plain rice, khichdi, roti, etc.), dal and vegetables.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page17 8. QUALITY & QUANTITY OF MEAL Feedback from children on a) Quality of meal In all the 32 sample schools (100%) checked by MI for MDM, the children were satisfied with the quality of meal. Table 9: Children Satisfied with the quality of meal

Number Percentage (%) Yes 32 100 No 0 0

b) Quantity of meal In 31 sample schools (97%) checked by MI for MDM, the children were satisfied with the quantity of meal, whereas in 01 school (3%) the children were not satisfied with the quantity of meal. The children reported that they got only 2 chapattis maximum.

Quality and quantity of MDM Quality of MDM

Table 10: Children Satisfied with the quantity of meal

Number Percentage (%) Yes 31 97 No 01 3

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page18 c) If children were not happy Please give reasons and suggestions to improve.

Since in 100 percent sample school visited by MI, MDM is prepared at school, the quality of cooked MDM was satisfactory. At least children get hot cooked MDM during interval. Regarding quantity of MDM served to children, in some schools children were not satisfied, especially elder children. According to them, number of chapattis served to them was not sufficient and they were refused when asked for extra chapattis. Also, quantity of dal and sabji is not sufficient for them.

9. SUPPLEMENTARY (i) Whether children are given micronutrients (Iron, folic acid, vitamin – A dosage) and de-worming medicine periodically? In 13 schools (41%) children were given micronutrients (Iron, folic acid, vitamin – A dosage) and de-worming medicine in the schools through Medical and Health Department, whereas in 19 schools (59%) children were not given micronutrients (Iron, folic acid, vitamin – A dosage) and de-worming medicine in the schools through Medical and Health Department. Table11: Children given micronutrients

Number Percentage (%)

Yes 13 41

No 19 59

(ii) Who administers these medicines and at what frequency?

These medicines were administered by health department. Out of 13 schools where children were given micronutrients, the frequency of these medicines was yearly in all the 13 schools (100%). (iii) Is there school Health Card maintained for each child?

School Health Card for each School child was maintained in 12 schools (37.5%) out of 32 sample schools checked by MI.

(iv) What is the frequency of health check-up?

In all the 12 schools (100%) where School Health Card for child was maintained, the frequency of health check-up was yearly.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page19 10. STATUS OF COOKS (i) Who cooks and serves the meal? (Cook/helper appointed by the Department or Self Help Group, or NGO or Contractor) Out of 32 sample schools checked by MI for MDM, cooks were employed

MDM preparation MDM served by children by School management in all the 32 sample schools (100%). Regarding serving of MDM in schools, in 24 schools (75%) MDM was served by cook/helper, in 03 schools (9%) MDM was served by teachers and in 05 schools (16%) MDM was served by children.

(ii) Is the number of cooks and helpers adequate to meet the requirement of the school? Out of 32 sample schools checked by MI for MDM, in all the 32 schools (100%), number of cooks and helpers was adequate to meet the requirement of the school. (iii) What is remuneration paid to cooks/helpers?

Cooks were paid fixed honorarium of Rs. 1000. Below 50 children one

Utensils for children taking MDM MDM served by Cook/helper cook was employed and if the strength of children was more than 50, then two cooks were employed. CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page20 (iv) Are the remuneration paid to cooks/helpers regularly? Out of 32 schools where MDM was monitored by MI, in 24 schools (75%) cooks were paid timely, whereas in 08 schools (25%) cooks were not paid timely. An amount of Rs. 1000 was paid to each cook for children up to 50. Up to 100 children there were 2 cooks and 3 cooks when number was more than 100 and up to 200 children.

(v) Social Composition of cooks /helpers? (SC/ST/OBE/Minority)

In all the 32 sample schools checked by MI for MDM and where MDM was prepared at schools, women were engaged as cooks. They constitute 56% SC, 22% ST, 22% from OBC category.

11. INFRASTRUCTURE Is a Pucca kitchen shed-cum-store: (a) Constructed and in use (b) Constructed but not in use under (c) Under construction (d) Sanctioned, but constructed not started (e) Not sanctioned

Out of 32 sample schools visited by MI for monitoring MDM, pucca kitchen sheds-cum-stores were constructed and were in use in 25 schools (78%). Pucca kitchen sheds-cum-stores were sanctioned but construction had not initiated in 01 school (3%). Pucca kitchen sheds-cum-stores were not sanctioned in 06 schools (19%).

12. In case the pucca kitchen shed is not available, where is the food being cooked and where the food grains /other ingredients are being stored? In schools, where pucca kitchen-shed was not available, MDM was cooked either in verandah or in open.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page21 Storage of Food grains Storage of Food grains As far as storage of grains was concerned, it was stored in classrooms in 14 schools (44%). In 18 schools (56%) the grains were stored in newly constructed pucca kitchen-shed cum store.

13. Whether potable water is available for cooking and drinking purpose?

Potable water for drinking and cooking was available in all the 32 sample schools (100%). 14. Whether utensils used for cooking food is adequate?

Similarly, all the 32 schools where MDM is prepared at schools (100%) have adequate number of utensils for cooking MDM.

15. What is the kind of fuel used?

Firewood used for MDM preparation Gas used for MDM preparation

In 17 schools (53%) out of 32 sample schools checked by MI for MDM, firewood is used as fuel for preparation of MDM, whereas in 15 schools (47%) LPG gas is used for MDM preparation.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page22 16. SAFETY & HYGIENE (i) General Impression of the environment, Safety and hygiene

Out of 32 sample schools checked by MI, in 02 schools (6%) MDM safety was reported very good, in 15 schools (47%) it was reported good and in 15 schools (47%) the same was reported average. MDM impact on cleanliness was reported very good in 02 schools (6%), good in 13 schools (41%) and in 17 schools (53%) it was reported average. In 02 schools (6%) MDM impact in maintaining discipline amongst children was found very good, in 12 schools (38%) the same was reported good, in 18 schools (56%) it was reported average. ii. Are children encouraged to wash hands before and after eating? In only 17 schools (53%) children were encouraged to wash hands before taking MDM, whereas in 31 schools (97%) children were encouraged to wash hands after taking MDM. i. Do the children take meals in an orderly manner?

Fire Extinguishers Children in order during MDM

In 31 schools (97%) children take meals in an orderly manner. ii. Conservation of water? Out of 32 schools visited by MI for MDM, in 15 schools (47%) children conserve water, while washing dishes.

v. Is the cooking process and storage of fuel safe, not posing any fire hazard?

In majority of schools cooking process and storage of fuels was proper and did not pose any fire hazards. Also, fire extinguisher was available in almost all the schools.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page23 17. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION (i) Extent of participation by Parents/ SMCs/ Panchayats /Urban bodies in daily supervision, monitoring, participation.

The extent of participation by Parents/SMCs/Panchayats /in daily supervision, monitoring, was quite satisfactory. In 29 schools (91%) Panchayats/ SMC participated in supervision and monitoring of MDM. In case of participation of parents, it was reported in 30 schools (94%).

(ii) Is any roster being maintained of the community members for supervision of the MDM?

No such roster is being maintained by the community members for supervision of the MDM.

(iii) Community members/ parents awareness about quantity of MDM per child a. At Primary level b. At Upper primary level

In 20 schools (62.5%) community members/ parents were aware of quantity of MDM per child being given at primary level. In 15 (47%) schools community members/parents were aware of quantity of MDM per child being given at upper primary level. (iv) General awareness of community members/ parents about the overall implementation of MDM programme In 18 schools (56.2%) community members/parents rated the overall implementation of the MDM programme as satisfactory. In 10 schools (31.2%) community members/parents rated the overall implementation of the MDM programme as good. In 04 schools (12.5%) community members/parents rated the overall implementation of the MDM programme as average.

(v) Source of awareness about MDM scheme

Number Percentage (%)

Newspaper/Magazines 03 9

Villagers/Friends/Relatives 07 22

Teacher 06 19

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page24 School 31 97

Radio 01 3

Television 01 3

Website - -

Any Other 01 3

18. INSPECTION & SUPERVISION Has the mid day meal programme been inspected by any State/District/Block level officers/officials?

Out of 32 sample schools checked by MI for MDM, only 01 school (3%) had been inspected by State level MDM officials/ OICs, 07 schools (22%) had been inspected by District level MDM officials; whereas 30 schools (94%) had been inspected by Block level officials. Thus, monitoring by State and district officials was not a regular phenomenon.

19. IMPACT Has the mid day meal improved the enrollment, attendance of children in school, general well being (nutritional status) of children? Is there any other incidental benefit due to serving cooked meal in schools?

In 14 schools (44%) teachers / headmasters CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page25 reported that MDM improved the enrollment, whereas in 23 schools (72%) teachers reported that MDM improved attendance of children in schools and in 24 schools (75%) teachers reported that MDM improved general well being (nutritional status) of children (the statements are the perception of teachers/ Headmaster) .

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page26 4th HALF YEARLY MONITORING REPORT OF CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION AND STUDIES (CDECS) ON MDM FOR THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN FOR THE PERIOD OF 1st April, 2012 TO 30 th September, 2012

FOR ALWAR DISTRICT Name of the Monitoring Institution CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION & STUDIES (CDECS) Period of the report 1st April, 2012 to 30 th September, 2012

Name of the District Alwar

Date of visit to the 15 th August, 2012 to 19 th Districts/EGS/Schools September, 2012

1. REGULARITY IN SERVING MEAL Whether the school is serving hot cooked meal daily? If there was interruption, what was the extent and reasons for the same?

Out of 34 sample schools visited by MI for MDM, in all the 34 sample schools (100%) hot cooked meal was served daily. Thus, all the sample school visited by MI served hot cooked meal daily to children and Children taking MDM there was no disruption in serving hot cooked meal daily to school children. The same was also reported by the school children.

Table 1: Regularity in serving MDM

Number Percentage (%) Yes 34 100 No 0 0

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page27 2. TRENDS

Extent of variation (As per school records vis-à-vis Actual on the day of visit)

No. Details On the day of visit

i Enrollment 4502 ii No. of children attending the 3105 school on the day of visit

Iii No. of children availing MDM as per 3002 MDM Register

Iv No. of children actually availing 3013 MDM on the day of visit v No. of children actually availing 3219 MDM on the previous day

3. REGULARITY IN DELIVERING FOOD GRAINS TO SCHOOL LEVEL (i) Is school receiving food grain regularly? If there is delay in delivering food grains, what is the extent of delay and reasons for the same?

Out of 34 schools monitored by MI for MDM, in 25 schools (100%) food grain was available for MDM. In 07 schools MDM is supplied by agency (Havells) and in the remaining 02 schools MDM was supplied by SHG (Annapurna Sahkari Samiti). Out of 25 schools where food grain was available for MDM, regular supply of food grain for MDM was found in all the 25 sample schools (100%). Table 2: Food grain for MDM available in Schools

Number Percentage (%) Yes 25 100 No 0 0

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page28 Table 3: Regular Supply of food grain in Schools

Number Percentage (%)

Yes 25 100

No 0 0

(ii) Is Buffer stock of one-month’s requirement is maintained?

Out of 25 schools where regular food grain for MDM was available, food grain stock of one month for MDM was available in 24 schools (96%) and in 01 school (4%) food grain stock for one month for MDM was not available. Table 4: Buffer Stock of one-month’s requirement maintained

Number Percentage (%)

Yes 24 96

No 01 4

(iii) Is the food grains delivered at the school?

Out of 34 schools where MDM was monitored by MI, in all the 25 sample schools (100%) where MDM was prepared at schools, food grain for MDM was delivered at the school. In the remaining 09 schools MDM was prepared by NGO/SHG.

Table 5: Food grains delivered at Schools Number Percentage (%)

Yes 25 100

No 0 0

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page29

(v) Quality of Food grains Out of 25 schools where MDM was prepared at school, in 04 schools (16%) quality of food grain was very good, in 13 schools (52%) the quality

Quality of food grain was good, whereas in 08 schools (32%) quality of food grain was average. Table 6: Quality of Food grains

Very good 04 16

Good 13 52 Average 08 32

4. REGULARITY IN DELIVERING COOKING COST TO SCHOOL LEVEL (iii) Is school receiving cooking cost in advance regularly? If there is delay in delivering cooking cost what is the extent of delay and reasons for it? In total, 04 schools (16%) out of 25 schools where MDM was prepared at schools received cooking cost regularly and in 21 schools (84%) cooking cost was not made available to them regularly. Out of them, in all the 21 schools (100%) cooking cost was not available for more than 30 days.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page30 As the cooking cost and food grains are supplied from district, the delay/ disruption in regular receipt of food grains and cooking cost is a district issue rather than a school issue. Hence, the district office has to review the matter and ensure the timely releases.

Table 7: Regularity in delivering Cooking Cost Number Percentage (%) Yes 04 16 No 21 84

(iv) In case of delay, how schools manage to ensure that there is no disruption in the feeding programme? The Schools and SHG arrange food materials and firewood on hired basis to manage MDM cooking. Sometimes, headmaster/teacher contributes for cooking cost or as per availability of funds in SMC account they use the money for some time for MDM, too.

(iii) Is cooking cost paid by Cash or through banking channel?

In all the 25 schools (100%) cooking cost is paid through bank electronic transfers directly into the account of SMC.

5. SOCIAL EQUITY (i) Did you observe any gender or caste or community discrimination in cooking or serving or seating arrangements?

In all the 34 schools (100%) monitored by MI for MDM, no discrimination (gender, caste and community) in cooking or serving or seating arrangements has been observed by MI. Table 8: Gender/Caste/Community discrimination in Cooking/Serving/ Seating arrangements Number Percentage (%) Yes 0 0 No 34 100

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page31 6. VARIETY OF MENU (i) Has the school displayed its weekly menu, and is it able to adhere to the menu displayed?

In 28 schools (82%) out of 34 sample schools checked by MI for MDM displayed their weekly menu, whereas 06 schools (18%) did not display MDM menu. Out of the total schools (28), where weekly menu was displayed, all the 28 schools (100%) adhered to the menu displayed.

MDM Menu Table 9: School displayed its weekly Menu Number Percentage (%) Yes 28 82 No 06 18

7. (ii) Is there variety in the food served or is the same food served daily? There was variety in the food served for MDM. This includes Chapatti & Vegetable (seasonal), Dal/vegetable & Rice, Khichdi, Dal and Chapatti, Dal& Bati, Chapatti and vegetable. Also, weekly fruits were served under MDM in the schools.

(iii) Does the daily menu include rice / wheat preparation, dal and vegetables?

Daily menu includes rice / wheat preparation (includes plain rice, khichdi, roti etc.), dal and vegetables. CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page32 8. QUALITY & QUANTITY OF MEAL Feedback from children on c) Quality of meal In 33 sample schools (97%) checked by MI for MDM, the children were satisfied with the quality of meal, whereas in 01 school (3%) the children were not satisfied with the quality of meal.

Quality and Quantity of MDM Quality of Chapatti

Table 10: Children Satisfied with the quality of meal

Number Percentage (%) Yes 33 97 No 01 3

d) Quantity of meal In 31 sample schools (91%) checked by MI for MDM, the children were satisfied with the quantity of meal, whereas in 03 schools (9%) the children were not satisfied with the quantity of meal. The children reported that they got maximum 2 chapattis.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page33 Table 11: Children Satisfied with the quantity of meal

Number Percentage (%) Yes 31 91 No 03 9

c) If children were not happy Please give reasons and suggestions to improve.

Quality of MDM was satisfactory in majority of sample schools visited by MI. At least children got hot cooked MDM during interval. However, in a few schools children complained about quality of dal, vegetable, khichdi and Chapattis. Regarding quantity of MDM served to children, in some schools children were not satisfied, especially elder children. According to them, number of chapattis served to them was not sufficient for elder children. Also, quantity of dal, vegetable and khichdi was not sufficient for elder children.

9. SUPPLEMENTARY (ii) Whether children are given micronutrients (Iron, folic acid, vitamin – A dosage) and de-worming medicine periodically? In 18 schools (53%) children were given micronutrients (Iron, folic acid, vitamin – A dosage) and de-worming medicine in the schools through Medical and Health Department, whereas in 16 schools (47%) children were not given micronutrients (Iron, folic acid, vitamin – A dosage) and de-worming medicine in the schools through Medical and Health Department. Table: Children given micronutrients

Number Percentage (%) Yes 18 53 No 16 47

(ii) Who administers these medicines and at what frequency?

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page34 These medicines were administered by health department. Out of 18 schools where children were given micronutrients, the frequency of these medicines was yearly in all the 18 schools (100%). (iii) Is there school Health Card maintained for each child?

School Health Card for each School child was maintained in 11 schools (32%) out of 34 sample schools checked by MI.

(iv) What is the frequency of health check-up? School Health Card

In all the 11 schools (100%) where School Health Card for child was maintained, the frequency of health check-up was yearly.

10. STATUS OF COOKS (ii) Who cooks and serves the meal? (Cook/helper appointed by the Department or Self Help Group, or NGO or Contractor) Out of 34 sample schools checked by MI for MDM, cooks were employed by School Management in 25 schools (73.5%), in 02 schools (6%) MDM was supplied by SHG (Annapurna Sahkari Samiti) and in 07 schools (20.5%) MDM was supplied by an agency (Havells). Regarding serving of MDM in schools, in 26 schools (76.5%) MDM was served by cook/helper, in 01 school (3%) MDM was served by teachers and in 07 schools (20.5%) MDM was served by children.

MDM served by children MDM served by Cook/helper

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page35

(ii) Is the number of cooks and helpers adequate to meet the requirement of the school? Out of 34 sample schools checked by MI for MDM, in 25 schools (100%) where MDM was prepared at schools, number of cooks and helpers was adequate to meet the requirement of the school.

(iii) What is remuneration paid to cooks/helpers?

Cooks were paid fixed honorarium of Rs. 1000. Below 50 children one cook was employed and if the strength of children was more than 50, then two cooks were employed.

(iv) Are the remuneration paid to cooks/helpers regularly? Out of 25 schools where MDM was prepared at school, in 10 schools (40%) cooks were paid timely, whereas in 15 schools (60%) cooks were not paid timely. An amount of Rs. 1000 was paid to each cook for children up to 50. Up to 100 children there were 2 cooks and 3 cooks when number was more than 100 and up to 200 children.

(v) Social Composition of cooks /helpers? (SC/ST/OBE/Minority)

In all the 25 sample schools checked by MI for MDM and where MDM was prepared at schools, women were engaged as cooks. They constitute 44% SC, 4% ST, 48% OBC and 3% belong to general category.

11. INFRASTRUCTURE Is a Pucca kitchen shed-cum-store: (f) Constructed and in use (g) Constructed but not in use under (h) Under construction (i) Sanctioned, but constructed not started (j) Not sanctioned

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page36 Out of 25 sample schools where MDM was prepared at school, pucca kitchen-sheds-cum-stores were constructed and were in use in 17 schools (68%). Pucca kitchen sheds-cum-stores had been constructed but it was not in use in 01 school (4%). Pucca kitchen-sheds-cum-stores were not sanctioned in 07 schools (28%).

12. In case the pucca kitchen shed is not available, where is the food being cooked and where the food grains /other ingredients are being stored?

In schools, where pucca kitchen-shed was not available, MDM was cooked either in verandah or in open. As far as storage of grains was concerned, it was stored in classrooms in 14 schools (56%). In 11 schools (44%) the grains were stored in newly constructed pucca kitchen-shed cum store. In the remaining 09 schools MDM was prepared by SHG/ Agency.

13. Whether potable water is available for cooking and drinking purpose?

Potable water for drinking and cooking was available in 31 sample schools (91%), whereas in 03 schools (9%) water for drinking and cooking was not available.

14. Whether utensils used for cooking food is adequate?

Similarly, all the 25 schools where MDM was prepared at schools (100%) had adequate number of utensils for cooking MDM. 15. What is the kind of fuel used?

Firewood used for MDM

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page37 In 24 schools (96%) out of 25 sample schools checked by MI for MDM and where MDM was prepared at schools, firewood was used as fuel for preparation of MDM, whereas in 01 school (4%) LPG gas was used for MDM preparation.

16. SAFETY & HYGIENE (i) General Impression of the environment, Safety and hygiene

Out of 34 sample schools checked by MI, in 1 school (2.9%) MDM impact on safety was found very good, in 19 schools (55.8%) it was reported good, in 13 schools (38.2%) the same was reported average and in 01 school (2.9) it was reported poor. MDM impact on cleanliness was reported good in 17 schools (50%), in 15 schools (44%) it was reported average and in 02 schools (6%) it was reported poor. In 01 school (2.9%) MDM impact in maintaining discipline amongst children was found very good, in 10 schools (29.4%) the same was reported good, in 22 schools (65%) it was reported average and in 01 school (2.9%) the same was reported poor. ii. Are children encouraged to wash hands before and after eating?

Children washing utensils Children in order while taking MDM In only 07 schools (21%) children were encouraged to wash hands before a taking MDM, whereas in 29 schools (85%) children were encouraged to wash hands after taking MDM. iii. Do the children take meals in an orderly manner?

Children not in order during MDM

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page38 In 29 schools (85%) children take meals in an orderly manner. iv. Conservation of water?

Out of 34 schools visited by MI for MDM, in 09 schools (26.5%) children conserve water, while washing dishes.

v. Is the cooking process and storage of fuel safe, not posing any fire hazard?

In majority of schools cooking process and storage of fuels was proper and did not pose any fire hazards. Also, fire extinguisher was available in almost all the schools.

17. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION (i) Extent of participation by Parents/ SMCs/ Panchayats /Urban bodies in daily supervision, monitoring, participation.

The extent of participation by Parents/SMCs/Panchayats /in daily supervision, monitoring, was quite satisfactory. In 29 schools (85%) Panchayats/ SMCs participated in supervision and monitoring of MDM. In case of participation of parents, it was reported in 30 schools (88%).

(iii) Is any roster being maintained of the community members for supervision of the MDM?

No such roster is being maintained by the community members for supervision of the MDM.

(iii) Community members/ parents awareness about quantity of MDM per child a. At Primary level b. At Upper primary level

In 22 schools (65%) community members/ parents were aware of quantity of MDM per child being given at primary level. In 14 (41%) schools community members/parents were aware of quantity of MDM per child being given at upper primary level.

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page39 (iv) General awareness of community members/ parents about the overall implementation of MDM programme In 30 schools (88%) community members/parents rated the overall implementation of the MDM programme as satisfactory. In 04 schools (12%) community members/parents rated the overall implementation of the MDM programme as good.

(v) Source of awareness about MDM scheme

Number Percentage (%)

Newspaper/Magazines 01 3

Villagers/Friends/Relatives 06 18

Teacher 10 29

School 32 94

Radio 01 3

Television 01 3

Website - -

Any Other - -

18. INSPECTION & SUPERVISION Has the mid day meal programme been inspected by any state/district/block level officers/officials?

Out of 34 sample schools checked by MI for MDM, only 01 school (3%) had been inspected by State level MDM officials/ OICs, 07 schools (21%) had been inspected by District level MDM officials; whereas 33 schools (97%) had been inspected by Block level officials. Thus, monitoring by State and district officials was not a regular phenomenon. CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page40 19. IMPACT Has the mid day meal improved the enrollment, attendance of children in school, general well being (nutritional status) of children? Is there any other incidental benefit due to serving cooked meal in schools?

In 19 schools (56%) teachers / headmasters reported that MDM improved the enrollment, whereas in 24 schools (71%) teachers reported that MDM improved attendance of children in schools and in 27 schools (79%) teachers reported that MDM improved general well being (nutritional status) of children (School teachers/ Headmaster perceptions) .

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page41

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

AIE - Alternative and Innovative Educati on ACRs - Additional Classrooms APC - Assistant Project Coordinator BRC - Block Resource Centre BRCF - Block Resource Centre Facilitator CRC - Cluster Resource Centre CWSN - Children with Special Need CDECS - Centre for Development Communication & Studies DEO - District Education Officer DIET - District Institute of Education and Training DPO - District Project Office EGS - Education Guarantee Scheme ECCE - Early Childhood Care and Education GOR - Government of Rajasthan JE - Junior Engineer KGBV - Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya LEHAR - Learning Enhancement Activities in Rajasthan MDMS - Mid Day Meal Scheme MI - Monitoring Institute NGOs - Non Government Organizations NPEGEL National Programme For Education of Girls at El ementary Level OBCs - Other Backward Castes PHED - Public Health Engineering Department PRIs - Panchayat Raj Institutions RTE - Right To Education SCs - Scheduled Castes SPO - State Project Office SMC - School Management Committee SSA - Sarva S hiksha Abhiyan STs - Scheduled Tribes STCs - Special Training Centres SFG - School Facility Grant SCERT - State Council For Educational Research and Training TLM - Teaching Learning Material

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page42

List of Schools - District Ganganagar Sample Schools

KGBV Schools NPEGEL Minimum Civil Civil works sanctioned Sl.No. School Name of 3 CWSN Category school of urban areas Special training centres CALP 1 Govt. UPS No. 13 UPS 1 2 Govt. UPS 10Z UPS 1 1 3 Govt. Middle School Girls F Block UPS 1 4 Govt. Middle School 2E Choti UPS 1 1 5 Govt. Girls UPS Sadhuwali 1 6 Govt. UPS No. 6 Purani Abadi UPS 1 1 7 Govt. UPS No. 6 Sugar Mill UPS 1 8 Govt. UPS No. 8 UPS 1 1 9 Govt. PS Banwali PS 1 10 Govt. Girls UPS Banwali UPS 1 1 1 11 Govt. UPS No.4 UPS 1 12 Govt. UPS No.2 UPS 1 13 Govt. UPS 1 PPM UPS 1 1 14 Govt. UPS 1 KSR UPS 1 15 Govt. UPS 28 PBN UPS 1 16 Govt. UPS 22 LGW UPS 1 1 17 Govt. PS Dhaba Jhalar PS 18 Govt. PS Upnivesan Colony PS 19 KGBV Amarpura Jatan 1 20 Govt. PS 2 T (Jodhawala) PS 1 21 Govt. UPS 7 O Colony UPS 22 Govt. UPS 16-17 H Ghanjatiya UPS 1 23 Govt. Girls UPS Srikaranpur 1 24 Govt. UPS UPS 1 1 25 Govt. PS 5 K.K PS 1 26 Govt. PS Ratewala PS 27 Govt. PS 10 BB PS 28 Govt. UPS 13 M.L UPS 1 1 29 Govt. UPS Sanskrit Ward No. 8 UPS 1 30 Govt. UPS 43 F Monda UPS 1 31 Govt. UPS 2 K.K UPS 1 32 Govt. UPS 6 A.P.M 1 33 Govt. UPS 89 GB 1 34 Govt. PS 26 A 1 35 Govt. UPS 68/2 GB 1 36 Govt. UPS Salempura UPS 1 1 37 Govt. UPS 12 SJM UPS 1 38 KGBV 3 STR Nai Mandhi 1 39 Govt. PS 5 L.N.P PS 40 Govt. PS Chak Maharajka PS 10 6 6 3 7 10 2

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page43

List of Schools - District Alwar Sample Schools

V Special training centres Schools NPEGEL Civil Civil works Sl.No. School Name sanctioned Category of school urban areas 3 of CWSN CALP KGB 1 Govt. UPS Alamdika UPS 1 1 2 Govt . UPS AnandNagar UPS 1 3 Govt. PS Khirgachi PS 1 4 KGBV B. K Nagar 1 5 Govt. PS Kasba Kharital PS 1 6 Lords International School Chikani 1 7 Govt. PS BharuSagar PS 8 Govt. Girls UPS No. 2 Rajgarh UPS 1 9 KGBV Rajpurabada 1 10 Govt. PS Vidhota PS 11 Govt. UPS Dabla UPS 1 12 Govt. Girls UPS Bighota UPS 1 13 Govt. UPS Kandoli UPS 1 14 Govt. Sahmat Nagar PS 15 Govt. PS Tapukara PS 1 16 Govt. PS Bibipur PS 17 Govt. PS Maharajpura PS 18 Govt. UPS Shapura UPS 1 19 Govt. UPS Bala Dahra UPS 1 20 Govt. UPS Mangal bas UPS 1 21 Govt. PS Gavariya Basti PS 1 22 KGBV Umrain 1 23 Govt. PS Girls Umrain PS 24 Govt. PS Sikari Bas PS 25 Govt. PS Kankroli PS 26 Govt. UPS Jugravar UPS 1 27 Govt. PS Teej Ki Road PS 1 28 Govt. PS Kushalbag PS 29 Govt. UPS UPS 1 30 Govt. UPS Feelkhana No.1 UPS 1 1 1 31 Govt. Adharshila 1 32 Govt. UPS Nadka UPS 1 33 Govt. UPS Ramgarh UPS 1 1 34 Govt. UPS Jhareda UPS 1 1 35 Govt. UPS Kamalpur UPS 36 KGBV Chandigarh 1 37 Govt. UPS Gugrod UPS 1 38 Govt. UPS Girls Baroda Kan UPS 1 1 39 Govt. PS No. 1 Rajgarh Town PS 1 40 Govt. PS Titpuri PS 9 2 6 3 5 6 4

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page44 List of Schools showing gaps in data

I. Irregularity in delivering Cooking cost of school

S.No. List of schools Block 1 Govt. UPS No. 6 Purani Abadi Sriganganagar 2 Govt. UPS No. 8 Sriganganagar 3 Govt. PS Banwali Sadhulshshar 4 Govt. Girls UPS Banwali Sadhulshshar 5 Govt. UPS 1 PPM 6 Govt. UPS 28 PBN Suratgarh 7 Govt. UPS 22 LGW Suratgarh 8 Govt. PS Upnivesan Colony Suratgarh 9 Govt. PS 2 T (Jodhawala) SriKaranpur 10 Govt. UPS 16-17 H Ghanjatiya SriKaranpur 11 Govt. PS Ratewala Padampur 12 Govt. UPS 2 K.K Padampur 13 Govt. UPS 12 SJM 14 Govt. PS 5 L.N.P Sadhulshshar 15 Govt. PS Chak Maharajka Sadhulshshar

II. Non-satisfaction with quantity of MDM

S.No. List of schools Block 1 Govt. UPS 12 SJM Anupgarh

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page45 List of Schools showing gaps in data Alwar

III. Irregularity in delivering Cooking cost of school

S.No. List of schools Block 1. Govt. UPS Alamdika 2. Govt. PS Khirgachi Kishangarh 3. Govt. PS Kasba Kharital Kishangarh 4. Govt. PS BharuSagar Rajgarh 5. Govt. Girls UPS No. 2 Rajgarh Rajgarh 6. Govt. PS Vidhota Rajgarh 7. Govt. UPS Kandoli Rajgarh 8. Govt. Sahmat Nagar Tizara 9. Govt. PS Tapukara Tizara 10. Govt. PS Bibipur Tizara 11. Govt. UPS Shapura Tizara 12. Govt. UPS Bala Dahra Umrain 13. Govt. UPS Mangal bas Umrain 14. Govt. PS Gavariya Basti Tizara 15. Govt. PS Kankroli Alwar 16. Govt. PS Teej Ki Road Umrain 17. Govt. PS Kushalbag Umrain 18. Govt. UPS Kathumar Kathumar 19. Govt. UPS Girls Baroda Kan Kathumar 20. Govt. PS No. 1 Rajgarh Town Rajgarh 21. Govt. PS Titpuri Kathumar

IV. Non-satisfaction with quality of MDM

S.No. List of schools Block 1 Govt. UPS Gugrod Ramgarh

V. Non-satisfaction with quantity of MDM

S.No. List of schools Block 1 Govt. UPS Kandoli Rajgarh 2 Govt. Sahmat Nagar Tizara 3 Govt. PS Kushalbag Umrain

CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page46 CDECS/MI/4HLY Report/SGN&Alwar Page47