DOCSLIB.ORG

(Somnath Bharti) on Domestic Violence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Somnath Bharti) on Domestic Violence © 2018 JETIR November 2018, Volume 5, Issue 11 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Use Of Forensic Science Principles To Solve The Case Study Of Former Delhi Law Minister (Somnath Bharti) On Domestic Violence Dr. Prithvi Raj Institute of Forensic Science, Gandhinagar Abstract: Marriage and bounding between two opposite sex species is the constructive relationship which give us a hope to their new generation’s progress and universal survival. Most of the time it works in a smooth manner but some time both parties with the involvement of other society member create division between them and a good relation broke. To solve this case study researcher will apply the Locard Principles of Forensic Science. Kay Words:-Marriage, Forensic Principles Introduction: Details related law and provision of domestic violence In India The Protection Of Women From Domestic Violence Act 2005 Differs From The Provision Of The Penal Code - Section 498A Of The Indian Penal Code - In That It Provides A Broader Definition Of Domestic Violence. Domestic Violence Is Defined By Section 3 Of The Act As “Any Act, Omission Or Commission Or Conduct Of The Respondent Shall Constitute Domestic Violence In Case It: Harms Or Injures Or Endangers The Health, Safety, Life, Limb Or Well-being, Whether Mental Or Physical, Of The Aggrieved Person Or Tends To Do So And Includes Causing Physical Abuse, Sexual Abuse, Verbal And Emotional Abuse And Economic Abuse; Or Harasses, Harms, Injures Or Endangers The Aggrieved Person With A View To Coerce Her Or Any Other Person Related To Her To Meet Any Unlawful Demand For Any Dowry Or Other Property Or Valuable Security; Or Has The Effect Of Threatening The Aggrieved Person Or Any Person Related To Her By Any Conduct Mentioned In Clause (A) Or Clause (B); Or Otherwise Injures Or Causes Harm, Whether Physical Or Mental, To The Aggrieved Person.” The Act Goes On, Through the Section Explanation 1, To Define "Physical Abuse", "sexual Abuse", "Verbal and Emotional Abuse" And "Economic Abuse". JETIR1811626 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 162 © 2018 JETIR November 2018, Volume 5, Issue 11 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Other Countries He 1994 Violence against Women Act (vawa), With Additions Passed In 1996, Outlined Grant Programs To Prevent Violence Against Women And Established A National Domestic Violence Hotline. In Addition, New Protections Were Given To Victims Of Domestic Abuse, Such As Confidentiality Of New Address And Changes To Immigration Laws That Allow A Battered Spouse To Apply For Permanent Residency. The Key Provisions Of Vawa Are: Full Funding Of Rape Kits And Legal/Court Fees Associated With A Protection Order Victim Protection Orders Are Recognized and Enforced In All State, Tribal, And Territorial Jurisdictions Within The U.S. Implementation And Funding Of Special Domestic Violence Crime Units In Local Communities Special Domestic Violence And Sexual Violence Training For Law Enforcement Officers Ability Of Tribal Courts To Try Non-Indian Spouses Or Intimate Partners Of Indian Women In Domestic Or Dating Violence Cases Provision Allowing Undocumented Immigrants Who Are the Victims of Domestic Violence to Apply For a Green Card In Exchange For Helping Law Enforcement Officials Prosecute Their Abusers Parties of the Case 1. Mr. Somnath Bharthi (Handsome Husband)2. Lipika Bharti (Beautiful Wife) History of the case Mr. Somnath Bharti Lipika Mitra He belongs to Bihar and presently She is a working woman in New Delhi. lives in Delhi. He worked for poor and needy people as a lawyer and Both met through a Matrimonial website join AAP ( MLA from Malviya in 2010 and they decided to marry Nagar, New Delhi) Allegations Made By Parties on each other after marriage JETIR1811626 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 163 © 2018 JETIR November 2018, Volume 5, Issue 11 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Allegations Made By (Wife) Lipika Bharti Allegations Made By (Wife) Lipika On His Husband(somnath Bharti) Bharti On Manorama Rani Bharti (Mother in law) • Lied Before Marriage(He owned an • She Is Not Supportive In Taking International Law Firm) Care Of Their Grand Children • Honeymoon promises were not fulfilled (desire • Physical And Mantel Torture place etc.) Dowry Harassment • Physical and Mental Torture • Dowry Harassment • Forcing her wife to abort her unborn child • He set his Dog on me • Did not taking care of my and children • He is Economically Dependent on me(Wife) • He aggressive by nature and loses control over language • He manipulating the spouse details in affidavit (Election) Allegations Made By Husband(somnath Bharti) on his (Wife) Lipika Bharti She was putting pressure on me to leave his mother and politics But I love my wife and children but cannot leave my mother and motherland He is a Dearing person saying that I love to my wife in public even we can’t say private. Five principals of Forensic Science applied to the case:- First Principle of Individuality(Uniqueness) Lipika Bharti (Wife) • Age Is Around 39 Years • Working Women • Intelligent And Beautiful Looking Lady • She Does Not Do Any Work For Society • She is a Emossional Lady • And Little Bit Dromedary Somnath Bharti (Husband) • Age Is About 44 Years And Looking Handsome Personality • Highly Educated ( M.Sc. IIT Delhi And LAW Delhi University) JETIR1811626 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 164 © 2018 JETIR November 2018, Volume 5, Issue 11 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) • MLA (Malviya Nagar, New Delhi) and Worked As A Lawyer • He Aggressive By Nature And Loses Control Over Language • He Fought Against Two Deaths In NCERT Caused By Forced Drinking Of Sewage Water • He Succeeded In The Murder Charges Off On Eight Innocent Youth In 2012 Riot Against Delhi Police • He Fight For Helpless, Poor And Illiterate Class People Through Pils Principle Of Comparison: .According To Natural Law Theory- 1) - Most Of The Living Species (Mother) Are Taking Care Of Their Young Ones Up To The Certain Level Of Maturity 2.) -Majority Of Grandparents Loves to Their Grand Children. 3.) -Somnath Bharthi Is Around 40 Years old And Studies Say That At This Stage 90% Of Human Beings Are Mature and Less-violent . 4)-Majority of wives are financially dependent on their husband than why not a husband (We should change our perception). 5) -Doctor's physical report of his wife should be compared (Past/Present). 6)-Marriage and Exam are similar-In both cases results will not depend on our preparation (It may be Excellent, Very-Good, Good, Average, Below Average and Sometimes Bad) *Situations after marriage will always Change, so Both (Husband/Wife) should accept “Jasa Desh Vasa Behas” Principle Of Exchange Husband Wife 1. Need Of More Resources In 1. House Wife in Exchange of Working Exchange Of Less Resource. Women. 2. Less Time for Family in Exchange 2. New Husband’s Family In Exchange Of Political Work (MLA). Parental Family. 3. Reality in Exchange of Dream Life. 3. Financially Dependent on Husband 4. Collective Decisions in Exchange of In Exchange of Independent working Independent Decisions. woman. 4.More Responsible (Children, Mother in Law and Dog) In Exchange of Lesser Liability. 5.Fund Devaluation in Exchange of Saving (Income). 6. Reality in Exchange of Dream Life. JETIR1811626 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 165 © 2018 JETIR November 2018, Volume 5, Issue 11 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Principle Of Probability Probability Of Allegation (Favorable To Wife) 1. Mental And Physical Torture (Yes/No) =[1/2]=50% 2. Dowry Harassment(Yes/No)=[1/2]=50% 3. Husband Was Financially Dependent(Yes/No)=[1/2]=50% 4. Husband is Aggressive by Nature(Yes/No)=[1/2]=50% 5. Honeymoon Promises Not Fulfilled By Husband (Yes/No)=[1/2]=50% 6. Doesn’t take Care Of Wife And Children wife/Children/Mother/Dog/Political)=[2/5]=40% Principle of Progressive Change From Website (Girl Friend) to Home (Wife) Dream Life to Reality Love to Hate Respect to Allegations made on each other Private Matter to Public Matter Together to Separate Various agencies available to help harassed woman (Wife Lipika Bharti) • Various institution for domestic violence relief Women Commission {Delhi Commission Of Women(DCW)} • Police(just A Call to Police and Will Arrest Husband As Soon As Possible Early) • Family Courts • NGO’s • Other Courts • But These Laws Are Available Both Wife/ Husband but hardly we hared any news from husband side Opinion Of Peoples about domestic violence:- • A husband can’t be harassed by wife • Police will take easy if a harassed husband will call and treat that it’s fake call. • And unfortunate there is no cell for husband’s help only God can save him from such troubles. JETIR1811626 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 166 © 2018 JETIR November 2018, Volume 5, Issue 11 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Husband Is In Chakraview And Don’t Has Choice Dear Wife Children Mother Politics Now Very Critical Situation for a poor husband how to break chakraview Various Controversies on Somnath Bharti • Raid In Khirki Extension For Sex And Drugs Operating Elements:-He Without Investigation Raid With Supporters On Khirki Extension But Later AIIMS Medical Tests Confirmed That No Drug Traces Were Found In Their System. • Racist Remarks:-Women’s Organizations And Political Rival Accused Bharti Of Mouthing Racist Remarks While Dealing With The Women • Invitation Order To Judges:-Within A Couple Of Days After Taking Oath Of Office, Bharti Told Law Secretary To Arrange For A Meeting With All District Judges Of Delhi. • More Uncouth Than Un-parliamentary:-He Warned To Delhi Police That People Will Pick Each One And Thrash-’Chun Chun Kar Marege’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Delhi Assembly Election 2015 District-Wise & Ac-Wise List of Nominated Candidates S
    DELHI ASSEMBLY ELECTION 2015 DISTRICT-WISE & AC-WISE LIST OF NOMINATED CANDIDATES S. Cand. Candidate Name Party Name & District No. Assembly No. & Age/ Address No. S.No. Abbrevation & Name Name Sex 1 1 AJAY MUDGIL Independent (IND) 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 30/M 1215, PANA PAPOSIYAN NARELA DELHI DELHI 2 2 SURENDER Communist Party of India 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 48/M 73/6, Gali Mata, Vishwakarma Road, (Marxist-Leninist) Pana Udyan, Narela, Delhi. (Liberation) (CPI(ML)(L)) Delhi 3 3 SHARAD KUMAR Aam Aadmi Party (AAAP) 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 40/M 123, BHUMIYA CHOWK, VILLAGE BAKOLI DELHI-110036 DELHI 4 4 ROOPESH Bahujan Samaj Party 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 40/M 189,MAIN BAZAR, PANA UYDAN (BSP) NARELA DELHI-110040 DELHI 5 5 MANOJ KUMAR Independent (IND) 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 42/M 345, POCKET-4 SECTOR-A-6 NARELA DELHI 6 6 PARVENDER KUMAR Independent (IND) 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 36/M 2015, SABZI MANDI WALI GALI VILLAGE ALIPUR DELHI-110036 DELHI 7 7 BRIJ MOHAN Shivsena (SHS) 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 37/M 59, VILLAGE GHOGA NARELA DELHI-110040 DELHI 8 8 SHARAD KUMAR Aam Aadmi Party (AAAP) 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 40/M 123, BHUMIYA CHOWK, VILLAGE BAKOLI DELHI-110036 DELHI 9 9 NEELDAMAN KHATRI Bharatiya Janata Party 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 44/M 1619, CHADAI WALI GALI PANA (BJP) MAMUR PUR NARELA DELHI-110040 DELHI Page 1 of Pages 148 DELHI ASSEMBLY ELECTION 2015 DISTRICT-WISE & AC-WISE LIST OF NOMINATED CANDIDATES S. Cand. Candidate Name Party Name & District No.
    [Show full text]
  • List of MLA Contact Details
    7th Delhi Legislative Assembly AC AC MEMBERS ADDRESS CONTACT EMAIL ID NO. NAME S.Sh./Smt./Ms. DETAILS 1 NARELA Sharad Kumar H.No.123, Bhumiya Chowk, 8687686868 [email protected] Chauhan Village Bakoli, Delhi-36 9555484848 [email protected] 9818892004 2 BURARI Sanjeev Jha House No.09, Gali No.-11, 9953456787 [email protected] Pepsi Road, A2 Block, West 8588833505 Sant Nagar, Burari, Delhi-84 3 TIMARPUR Dilip Pandey Tower-B, 607, Dronagiri 9999696388 [email protected] Apartment, Sector-11, Near 7428281491 Parashuram Chowk Vasundhara, Ghaziabad 4 ADARSH Pawan Sharma A-13, Gali No.-36, 8588833404 [email protected] NAGAR Mahendra Park, Delhi-33 9811139625 5 BADLI Ajesh Yadav 56, Laxmi Kunj, Sector-13, 9958833979 [email protected] Rohini, Delhi-85 9990919797 27557375 6 RITHALA Mohinder Goyal 19, Swastik Kunj 9312658803 [email protected] Apartment., Sector-13, 9711332458 Rohini, Delhi-85 9810496182 7 BAWANA (SC) Jai Bhagwan C-290-91, Pucca Shahabad 9312282081 [email protected] Dairy, Delhi-42 9717921052 8 MUNDKA Dharampal Lakra C-29, New Multan Nagar, 9811866113 [email protected] New Delhi-56 8130099300 9 KIRARI Rituraj Govind B-19, Block,-B, Pratap Vihar, 9899564895 [email protected] Part-III, Gali No. 10, Kirari 9999654895 Suleman nagar, Delhi-86 10 SULTANPUR Mukesh Ahlawat WZ-43, Begum Pur 9990968261 [email protected] MAJRA (SC) Extension, Mangal Bazar 9250668261 Road, New Delhi-86 11 NANGLOI JAT Raghuvinder M-449, Guru Harkishan 9811011925 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List
    HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TH WEDNESDAY,THE 18 JULY,2012 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 TO 40 2. COMPANY JURISDICTION 41 TO 42 3. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 43 TO 55 4. REGISTRAR GENERAL / 56 TO 70 REGISTRAR (ORGL.) / REGISTRAR (ADMN.) / JOINT REGISTRARS (ORGL.) 18.07.2012 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 18.07.2012 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-1) HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS ______________________________ 1. CM APPL. 8481/2012 VIJAY SAI REDDY SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (CM For Restoration)In W.P Vs. UOI AND ORS .(C) 8691/2011 (Disposed-off Case) 2. W.P.(C) 3146/2012 JOSE ABRAHAM RITU KUMAR Vs. GOVT OF NCT AND ORS 3. W.P.(C) 3157/2012 MS. M.FATIMA ALVI AWANISH Vs. MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THE KUMAR,N.WAZIRI,A.SIDDIQUI ANGLO ARABIC SENION SECONDARY SCHOOL 4. W.P.(C) 3416/2012 ANTAR RASHTRIYA MANAV SHOBHA CM APPL. 7228/2012 ADHIKAAR NIGRAANI PARISHAD Vs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS 5. W.P.(C) 3789/2012 RAJENDRA KUMAR KESHAV KAUSHIK,ROHINI MUSA CM APPL. 7944/2012 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 6. W.P.(C) 3837/2012 GAURAV KUMAR BANSAL PETITIONER IN PERSON Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. FOR ADMISSION _______________ 7. W.P.(C) 8889/2011 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION THRU MAIL,SHOBHNA TAKKIAR Vs. DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT (Disposed-off Case) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List
    HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TH WEDNESDAY,THE 26 SEPTEMBER,2012 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 TO 43 2. COMPANY JURISDICTION 44 TO 46 3. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 47 TO 58 4. REGISTRAR GENERAL / 59 TO 74 REGISTRAR (ORGL.) / REGISTRAR (ADMN.) / JOINT REGISTRARS (ORGL.) 26.09.2012 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 26.09.2012 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-1) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS ______________________________ 1. CM APPL. 16396/2012 RAHUL MEHRA RAHUL MEHRA,DEVVRAT,PRASHANT In W.P.(C) 195/2010 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS BHUSHAN,SD SALWAN,DEVVRAT LOVKESH SAWHNEY,KK KHURANA,NEERAJ CHOUDHARY,ADITYA GARG,MANISH RAGHAV,SHYEL TREHAN,SUSHIL DUTT SALWAN 2. W.P.(C) 5543/2012 SOCIAL JURIST, A. CIVIL ASHOK AGARWAL,N.WAZIRI,NANDNI RIGHTS GROUP SAHNI,N.SAWHNAY Vs. RASHTRIYA VIRJANAND ANDH KANYA VIDHYALAYA AND ORS FOR ADMISSION _______________ 3. W.P.(C) 2932/2012 CENTRAL PUBLIC INTEREST PRASHANT BHUSHAN LITIGATION THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECREETARY Vs. UNION OF INDIA 4. W.P.(C) 3146/2012 JOSE ABRAHAM RITU KUMAR,N.WAZIRI Vs. GOVT OF NCT AND ORS AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS ____________________________ 5. W.P.(C) 4598/2010 P.K.CHATTERJEE AND ORS. SUBODH K.PATHAK,MADHU Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. TEWATIA,AJAY ARORA,ZUBEDA BEGUM,SHOBHNA TAKIAR,SANGEETA BHARTI 6. W.P.(C) 7865/2010 DELHI MEDICAL ASSOCIATION SHIVAJI M JADHAV,AJ CM APPL.
    [Show full text]
  • CONDOLENCE While As Similar Assets on the Gulabgarh Constituency Has Constituency Dina Nath Bhagat Constituency Shah Mohammad Sardarni & S
    FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2014 (PAGE 4) DAILY EXCELSIOR, JAMMU From page 1 TENTH DAY KRIYA BARKHI With profound grief and sorrow, we inform Barkhi of our beloved father Lt. Sh. the sad demise of our beloved son Master Another set of crorepatis in fray Adit Koul S/o Sh. Hira Lal Koul of Nadigam Surinder Gandotra S/o Lt. Sh. worth Rs 22.10 lakh. Mankotia with half share at Lalipora, ur-Rehman has movable assets ued at Rs 9.16 lakh including Shopian Kashmir, at present H. No. 254, Shanti Saroop Gandotra R/o Pouni Lane No. 10, Kabir Colony Poonch House (Reasi) will be performed at our has immovable assets of Rs 2 Malapora. of Rs 4.50 lakh including Ford Santro car and jewellery worth Talab Tillo, Jammu on 10-11-2014. lakh including 34 kanals and 11 BJP candidate from Figo car and Rs 2 lakh cash in Rs 6.25 lakh. TENTH DAY will be performed on 19-11- residence on 14th of Nov. 2014 marlas of agricultural land. Gulabgarh constituency Pardeep hand, while as similar assets on RS Pathania, BJP candidate 2014 (Wednesday) at Muthi Ghat around Friday at 12.00 Noon. PDP candidate from Karnah Singh has movable assets of Rs the name of his wife were val- from Ramnagar has movable 9.00 a.m. GRIEF STRICKEN constituency Raja Manzoor 32.89 lakh including 20 grams ued at Rs 3.75 lakh including assets of Rs 4.10 lakh including GRIEF STRICKEN Sh. Mohan Lal Koul-Grand Father Deepak Gandotra Ahmed Khan has movable gold jewellery valued at Rs Datson car and Rs 50,000 cash Rs 35,000 cash in hand.
    [Show full text]
  • FOURTH SESSION (Second Part)
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRIRTORY OF DELHI SESSION REVIEW – FOURTH SESSION (Second Part) Fourth Session Second Part (22 August 2016 to 26 August 2016): The House held four sittings during the Second Part of the Fourth Session of the Sixth Assembly. The Session commenced on 22 August 2016 and was adjourned sine die on 26 August 2016. Congratulatory Reference on Rio Olympics 2016: On 22.8.2016, the Chair congratulated PV Sindhu, Sakshi Malik, Dipa Karmakar and other Olympians on their stellar performance in the Rio Olympics 2016 and also the Organisers of the Rio Olympics. Felicitation of parents of Sakshi Malik, Olympic Bronze Medallist: On 23.8.2016, the Chair felicitated the parents of Sakshi Malik, Olympic Bronze medallist. The House adopted the following Motion moved by Ms. Alka Lamba (under Rule 114): “This House congratulates Sakshi Malik, Olympic bronze medallist in wrestling and welcomes her parents in the LG’s Gallery; This House appreciates the efforts and sacrifice of her parents in achieving this feat; and This House hopes the parents of other talented sportspersons take inspiration from them and encourage their children for the all round development of the sports talent.” The following Members participated in the discussion: Ms. Bhawna Gaur, Smt. Parmila Tokas, Shri Vijender Gupta, Hon’ble Leader of Opposition and Shri Gopal Rai, Hon’ble Minister of Labour. Questions: A total of 233 notices of questions were received for this session for Question Hour scheduled for four days. Out of these 80 notices of starred questions and 10 5notices of unstarred questions were admitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Click Here for List of Dispensaries
    DISTRICT WISE/ASSEMBLY WISE STATUS OF DELHI GOVT. ALLOPATHIC DISPENSARIES & SEED PUHC'S District Assembly Assembly Name Hon'ble MLA S.No. Dispensary/PUHC and Full Address Municipal Municipal Ward Name Hon'ble Municipal Councilor Date of Ownership of Rural/ Mother Lab Contact No. No. Ward No. opening Building (Own Urban Facility(Y/N) Building/Others incl. MPCC Specify) West 8 Mundka Sh. Rambir Shokeen 1 DGD Tikri Kalan: Khadi Gram Building, V 30 Mundka (NJFZ) Sh. Master Azad Singh 07.10.1978 Private (Rented) Rural No Not Available & PO Tikri Kalan,New Delhi-110041 West 8 Mundka Sh. Rambir Shokeen 2 DGD Mundka: Multipurpose Community 30 Mundka (NJFZ) Sh. Master Azad Singh 29.04.1988 MPCC (Revenue Rural No 28344658 centre,Mundka village,New Delhi-110041 Department) West 8 Mundka Sh. Rambir Shokeen 3 DGD Hiran Kudna: Village & P.O Hiran 30 Mundka (NJFZ) Sr. Master Azad Singh 31.03.1989 DHS Rural No Not Available Kudna New Delhi-110041 West 8 Mundka Sh. Rambir Shokeen 4 DGD Nangloi: C-II/8145 Camp No.-2 J J 31 Nangloi West (WZ) Ms. Bhoomi Rachhoya 1971 DHS Urban No 25474141 Colony nangloi New Delhi-41 West 8 Mundka Sh. Rambir Shokeen 5 Seed PUHC Kamruddin Nagar: A-38, 32 Nilothi Ms. Reeta Rambir Shokeen 09.07.2012 Private (Rented) Urban No Yadav Park, Kamruddin Nagar, Rohtak Road, Nangloi, Delhi-110041 West 8 Mundka Sh. Rambir Shokeen 6 Seed PUHC Nilothi: HNo. 83, Nilothi, 32 Nangloi Sh. Reeta Rambir Shokeen 01.04.2013 Private (Rented) Urban No 28364463 New Delhi-110041 West 11 Nangloi Jat Sh.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideology of Suspended Animation
    ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 The Ideology of Suspended Animation MADHU BHADURI Vol. 49, Issue No. 10, 08 Mar, 2014 Madhu Bhaduri ([email protected]) is a former diplomat and one of the founding membersof the Aam Aadmi Party. She has since quit the party. The Aam Aadmi Party’s claim to be a party with a difference rings hollow today. With its eyeon the assembly elections in Haryana and the Lok Sabha elections thereafter, it seems to be indulging in as much political opportunism as any other mainstream political party. The Lieutenant Governor of Delhi put the Delhi assembly in suspended animation after the resignation of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on 14 February 2014. The enormous hope that the Aam Admi Party (AAP) had ignited among people seems to be ebbing. The hope has not yet turned into ashes, but the enthusiasm for the party is on the wane. We are gradually returning to business as usual in Indian politics. The emergence of the party generated hope among people who viewed the prevalent corruption-driven politics with complete cynicism. AAP held out the promise of a political alternative, offering corruption free and dynasty free participatory democracy spearheaded by gram sabhas and mohalla sabhas. AAP wanted officials to be accountable to the people and public accounts to be made transparent. “Remove corruption and bring about participatory democracy” was the battle cry. The party achieved in the first round what had seemed impossible to accomplish. It fought the Delhi assembly elections in 2013 without black money and with disdain for ideology and formed the government.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Cases Withdrawn from the Court of Sh Vishal Pahuja Ld ACMM And
    Dated :- 05.10.2020 IN THE COURT OF SH. VISHAL PAHUJA, ACMM-01, RADC , ND In compliance of order no. E-16117-16186/Cases Transfer/CBI/RADC/Gaz./2020 Dated 04.10.2020 below mentioned cases in column no. 1 & 2 have been transferred to the court of Sh. Harvinder Singh ACMM-03 (Column No. 4) and Sh. Dhirendra Rana, ACMM-04 (Column No. 4) from the court of Sh. Vishal Pahuja, ACMM-01 (Column No. 3) S. (Column (Column No.2) (Column (Column No.4) (Column No. 5) No No.1) No.3) To (FIR From NO./CC NO.) 1 1266/14 STATE VS (Cr Cases SOMNATH BHARTI 27/2019) 54/18 2 STATE V/S (Cr Cases AMANATULLAH KHAN & 2/2019) ORS KARAN SINGH TANWAR 3 CC No. VS ARVIND 25/18 (Ct Cases KEJRIWAL & ORS 8/2019) 4 CC IMRAN HUSSAIN VS No.82/18 VIJENDER GUPTA & ORS (Ct Cases 17/2019) Sh.Harvinder Singh, Court No. 409 76/14 ACMM-03, RADC, 5 STATE VS SOMNATH Fourth Floor (Cr Cases New Delhi. BHARTI & ORS 17/2019) SARTHAK CHATURVEDI 6 CC No. VS ABHISHEK 86/18 BANAERJEE (Ct Cases 6/2019) 236/15 7 STATE VS GORA (Cr Cases CHAND DASS & ORS 33/2019) SATYENDER JAIN VS 8 CC MANJINDER SINGH No.15/18 (Ct Cases SIRSA 13/2019) DR SUBRAMANIAN 9 CC No. SWAMY VS SONIA Sh. Vishal 31/18 Pahuja, (Ct Cases GANDHI & ORS ACMM- 18/2019) 01, 10 CC NEGOLICE INDIA LTD VS No.72/18 POONAM & ORS RADC, New (Ct Cases Delhi. 21/2019) 11 88/18 RAJIV BABBAR VS (Ct Cases SHASHI THAROOR 23/2019) 12 CC No.
    [Show full text]
  • (CIVIL) NO. 229 of 2020 RAJEEV SURI ...PETITIONER Ve
    REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO. 229 OF 2020 RAJEEV SURI ...PETITIONER Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS with TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO. 230 OF 2020 CIVIL APPEAL NO. ….…..... OF 2020 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. …………./2020) (@ Diary No. 8430/2020) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 510/2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 638/2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 681/2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 845/2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 853 OF 2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 922/2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1041/2020 1 J U D G M E N T A.M. Khanwilkar, J. TABLE OF CONTENTS S.NO. TOPIC PARAS 1. Introduction 1 2. Objectives of the Project 2-10 3. Proceedings and Contentions of the 11-123 Parties Consideration 4. Rule of Law 124-135 5. Democratic Due Process and 136-158 Judicial Review 6. Need for Heightened Judicial 159-167 Review 7. Constitutionalism 168-172 8. Participatory Democracy in India 173-198 9. Change in Land Use 199 a) What is Master Plan and Zonal 200-202 Plan. b) Modification of Plans 203-228 c) Procedure before decision 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use decision 274-275 2 10. CVC Clearance a) Status of CVC and Procedure 276-287 Adopted for Grant of “No Objection” b) Non-application of mind 288-295 c) Legitimate Expectation 296-298 11. DUAC Approval a) Stage for Statutory Approval by 299-306 DUAC b) Arbitrariness in Grant of 307-312 Approval 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Mla Ratings 2019
    A comprehensive & objective rating of the Elected Representatives’ performance DELHI MLA RATINGS 2019 he´pee SkeÀ Dehe#eheeleer mebmLeeve nw pees 1999 mes GÊejoe³eer Meemeve keÀes me#ece yeveeves keÀer efoMee ceW keÀece keÀj jner nw~ he´pee veeieefjkeÀeW keÀes peevekeÀejer Deewj heefjhe´s#³e he´oeve keÀj Meemeve‑efJeefOe ceW Yeeie uesves kesÀ efueS MeefÊeÀ he´oeve keÀjleer nw leeefkeÀ Jes cele‑hesìer lekeÀ ner meerefcele ve jns Deewj jepeveereflekeÀ ªhe mes meef¬eÀ³e Deewj meeqcceefuele nes mekeWÀ~ ³en J³eehekeÀ MeesOekeÀe³e& keÀjleer nw Deewj veeieefjkeÀeW keÀer mecem³eeDeeW keÀes Gpeeiej keÀjleer nw leeefkeÀ Jes GmekesÀ he´efle peeieªkeÀ nes mekeWÀ, Deewj mejkeÀejer Deewj efveJee&ef®ele he´efleefveefOe³eeW kesÀ keÀece keÀes ueeceyebo keÀj mekeWÀ~ mecem³ee he´pee keÀer he´efleef¬eÀ³ee he´pee keÀe ceevevee nw efkeÀ De®íer Meemeve‑efJeefOe keÀer he´pee DeeBkeÀæ[eW hej DeeOeeefjle MeesOekeÀe³e& keÀjleer nw keÀceer kesÀ efueS DeveefYe%e Deewj Deueie‑Leueie heæ[s Deewj veeieefjkeÀeW, ceeref[³ee, Deewj mejkeÀejer he´Meemeve efveJee&ef®ele he´efleefveefOe Deewj he´Meemeve ef]peccesoej keÀes peve mecem³eeDeeW mes mecyebefOele peevekeÀejer he´oeve nQ, ve efkeÀ ceewpetoe mece³e kesÀ leb$e ³ee veerefle³eeB~ keÀjleer nw Deewj ®egves ieS he´efleefveefOe³eeW kesÀ meeLe FmekesÀ DeefleefjÊeÀ, veeieefjkeÀeW Deewj mLeeveer³e efceuekeÀj GvekeÀer keÀe³e&‑he´Ceeefue³eeW ceW DekegÀMeuelee mejkeÀej kesÀ yeer®e he´YeeJeMeeueer Jeeo‑J³eJnej keÀer hen®eeve keÀjves Deewj Gme keÀes otj keÀjves, met®evee keÀes megefJeOeepevekeÀ yeveeves kesÀ GhekeÀjCeeW keÀe Yeer
    [Show full text]
  • Somnath Bharti & Ors
    CNR No. DLCT12-000039-2019 Criminal Case No. 09/19 FIR No. 659/16 PS : Hauz Khas State Vs. Somnath Bharti & Ors. 23.01.2021 At 11.00 am Proceedings taken up physically as well as through Virtual Mode. Present:- Ld APP for the State. Convict Som Nath Bharti present in person on bail. Mr. Hari Haran, Ld Senior counsel alongwith Ld counsel Sh Mohd Irshad (physically present) are also present for convict Som Nath Bharti through Webex in terms of the request of the convict regarding his application for hearing through physical mode as well as by virtual mode which is moved today physically. Accused Sandeep @ Sonu is present in person with surety and he filed bail bond/surety bond in terms of Section 437-A Cr.PC for sum of Rs. 10,000/- each, same is perused and accepted. An application on behalf of the convict Som Nath Bharti is moved for taking relevant information on record and to consider the same while passing order on sentence and if required, necessary enquiry be directed by this Court. Heard the submission on behalf of the State and on behalf of the convict Som Nath Bharti regarding application of the convict Som Nath Bharti with prayer of releasing him on Probation and for granting him the benefit of The Probation of Offender Act, 1958 and in alternate considering the factor relating to the background of the convict to be considered while passing the order on sentence. It is submitted on behalf of the State that maximum sentence as per law may be awarded to the Convict Som Nath Bharti.
    [Show full text]