Bruno Vignjević

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bruno Vignjević CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Repository of the University of Rijeka SVEUČILIŠTE U RIJECI FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET ODSJEK ZA POVIJEST Bruno Vignjević SLOJEVI SJEĆANJA: KOMPARATIVNA ANALIZA ANTIFAŠISTIČKIH KOMEMORACIJA U BREZOVICI I SRBU DIPLOMSKI RAD Rijeka, 2017. SVEUČILIŠTE U RIJECI FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET ODSJEK ZA POVIJEST SLOJEVI SJEĆANJA: KOMPARATIVNA ANALIZA ANTIFAŠISTIČKIH KOMEMORACIJA U BREZOVICI I SRBU DIPLOMSKI RAD Studij: Filozofija – Povijest Mentor: dr. sc. Vjeran Pavlaković Student: Bruno Vignjević Rijeka, 2017. 2 SADRŽAJ: 1. UVOD ........................................................................................................................ 4. 1.1. Predmet, svrha i cilj istraživanja ..................................................................... 7. 1.2. Problem istraživanja ......................................................................................... 7. 1.3. Radna hipoteza .................................................................................................. 8. 1.4. Znanstvene metode ............................................................................................ 9. 1.5. Struktura rada .................................................................................................. 10. 2. KULTURA SJEĆANJA ………………………………………………………….. 12. 2.1. Pojam i uloga kulture sjećanja ………………………………........................ 12. 2.2. Status antifašističke kulture sjećanja u Republici Hrvatskoj od 1990. do danas - kratki pregled ………………………………………………………………………... 18. 3. HISTORIOGRAFSKE KONTROVERZE O BREZOVICI I SRBU …………. 30. 3.1. Brezovica – Marginalizacija i aktualizacija ………………………………... 30. 3.2. Srb – Dihotomija sjećanja …………………………………………………… 43. 4. POLITIČKI RITUALI I KULTURA SJEĆANJA: PROUČAVANJE KOMEMORATIVNIH PRAKSI (2014.-2016.) …………………………………… 60. 4.1. Dan antifašističke borbe u Brezovici ……………………………………….. 61. 4.2. Dan ustanka naroda Like u Srbu …………………………………………... 71. 4.3. Analiza medijskih izvještaja s komemoracija ……………………………... 85. 5. ZAKLJUČAK ……………………………………………………………………. 88. 6. LITERATURA …………………………………………………………………… 90. 3 1. UVOD 1.1.Predmet, svrha i cilj istraživanja Od najranijeg doba ljudske civilizacije, u svim društvenim zajednicama moguće je pronaći određene oblike kulture sjećanja. Možemo reći kako su ljudi oduvijek imali potrebu pamćenja određenih događaja, obilježavanja i komemoriranja te konačno obvezu čuvanja sjećanja i prenošenja istoga novim generacijama. Pritom moramo razlučiti sjećanje i pamćenje pojedinca od sjećanja i pamćenja šire društvene zajednice. Kod pojedinca do sjećanja dolazi spontano; to uključuje obiteljske navike, uspomene, rodoslovna stabla. Sjećanja šire društvene zajednice ne nastaju spontano, već takvo sjećanje i pamćenje treba tek stvoriti pregledom arhivskog materijala, obilježavanjem obljetnica, organiziranjem proslava te podizanjem spomenika. Bez obilježavanja i komemoriranja mjesta sjećanja ne bi postojala, povijest bi ih pregazila. Mjesto sjećanja je pojam koji uvodi francuski povjesničar Pierre Nora tvrdeći kako ta mjesta nisu samo čuvari sjećanja, već su i mjesta na kojima se sjećanja izmišljaju i izgrađuju u skladu sa službenim sustavima vrijednosti.1 U prošlim vremenima gospodar, vlastelin, kralj ili car, a u moderno vrijeme država oblikuje sjećanje i pamćenje pojedinaca u svrhu homogenizacije i integracije različitih društvenih skupina. Pamćenje posjeduje svaki pojedinac, no država je ta koja s druge strane taj pluralizam pamćenja nastoji, često na selektivan način, unificirati u jedan nacionalni narativ, interpretaciju ili priču s kojom će se svi pojedinci morati ili moći identificirati. Bivša jugoslavenska te današnja hrvatska država unatoč različitom vremenskom i ideološkom kontekstu dijele mnoge slične obrasce odnosa prema službenoj kulturi sjećanja. Kao što ćemo vidjeti kasnije, obje su države nastojale konstruirati i interpretirati mjesta sjećanja u skladu sa službenom političkom ideologijom. Povijesne činjenice koje su se dogodile, a koje se nisu uklapale u spomenuti ideološki obrazac bile su izostavljane, reinterpretirane te konačno i odbacivane. U proteklih 25 godina postojanja samostalne Republike Hrvatske, država je na razne načine nastojala izgraditi jedinstveni nacionalni povijesni narativ, odnosno interpretaciju događaja iz nacionalne povijesti koja je mnoga individualna i kolektivna sjećanja nastojala odbaciti ili ignorirati. Službeni državni narativ 1 Pierre Nora, „Između pamćenja i historije. Problematika mjesta“, u: Kultura pamćenja i historija / (prir.) [i] prevele Maja Brkljačić i Sandra Prlenda, Zagreb, Golden marketing-Tehnička knjiga, 2006. str. 28. Nora tvrdi kako se „pojam mjesta pamćenja javio zato što su u našem društvu nestali rituali. Stvara ga, uspostavlja, određuje, konstruira, dekretom proglašava, umjetno i namjerno održava zajednica iz temelja ponesena promjenom i obnavljanjem.“ 4 određenih događaja iz nacionalne povijesti ne podrazumijeva nužno tumačenje događaja onako kako su se i dogodili, nego onako kako odgovara državi, političkoj eliti ili ideologiji koju zastupaju. Često takvi narativi ne odgovaraju povijesnim činjenicama i jednostavno su izmišljeni. Jedan od takvih narativa jest antifašistička borba hrvatskog naroda u Drugom svjetskom ratu, čiji se značaj stvaranjem neovisne hrvatske države nastojao umanjiti, a ponekad i otvoreno negirati. Spomenuti narativ i danas predstavlja generator širih društvenih, kulturnih i političkih sukoba. Aleida Assman smatra kako je zaborav imanentan čovjekovoj prirodi te da ljudi neprestano odbacuju stare proizvode u prilog novih, što je usporedivo sa socijalnom i kulturnom promjenom tijekom kojih neprestano i neminovno blijede i iščezavaju sjećanja, iskustva, umjetnička djela i sustavi znanja. s druge strane, političko pamćenje, prema Assman, postiže stabilnost zahvaljujući radikalnom sadržajnom smanjenju, visokom simboličkom intenzitetu, kolektivnim ritualima te normativnoj obveznosti.2 Individualno ljudsko pamćenje predstavlja dakle krhku materiju čija je esencija zaborav, a koji političko pamćenje nastoji spriječiti, najčešće putem ponavljanja određenih društvenih i političkih rituala, primjerice komemoracija, odnosno načina odavanja počasti ili prisjećanja određenog događaja ili pojedinaca. Dakle, predmet mojega rada čini kultura sjećanja na konkretnim primjerima te odnos države, odnosno vlasti, prema istoj. U moderno doba, za razliku od antičkog, dolazi do evolucije sjećanja, dok živo sjećanje nestaje zajedno sa svojim suvremenicima, a materijalni ostaci jedne kulture ostaju smješteni su u knjižnicama, muzejima, arhivima te akademijama. Pamćenje se sustavno strukturira, katalogizira i konzervira, za razliku od prijašnjih vremena kada enciklopedijski obrasci sakupljanja ljudskog znanja nisu bili na stupnju razvoja kojemu trenutno svjedočimo. Pamćenje predstavlja organizirano skladištenje znanja, dok sjećanje pripada pojedincu koji ga evocira i često je nepouzdano. Kolektivno pamćenje, individualno pamćenje, mjesta sjećanja i identitet konstantno se međusobno prožimaju. Potrebno je istaknuti još jednu razliku između predmoderne i moderne kulture sjećanja, koja se očituje u odnosu države prema kulturi sjećanja vlastitog naroda. Državne institucije imaju mogućnost oblikovanja pamćenja u svrhu nacionalnih interesa, i to često rade oblikujući određene događaje iz nacionalne povijesti u posebnu, službeno propisanu interpretaciju povijesti koja se obrađuje u organiziranom odgojno-obrazovnom procesu. S druge strane, spomenici i memorijali tvrdoglavo se odupiru namjerama države te nastavljaju živjeti svojim životom unatoč drugačijim društveno-političkim kontekstima te čestim 2 Aleida Assmann, Duga sjenka prošlosti. Kultura sjećanja i politika povijesti, Beograd, Biblioteka XX.vek, 2011. str. 59. i 67. 5 povijesnim reinterpretacijama. Kao što kaže Young, spomenici sami po sebi nemaju velike vrijednosti, oni su tek kamenje u krajoliku, ali kao dio nacionalnih rituala ili predmet nacionalnog hodočašća nekog naroda ispunjeni su nacionalnom dušom i sjećanjem.3 Svjestan kompleksnosti materije, pokušavam kao svrhu diplomskog rada analizirati mjesta sjećanja kroz primjere materijalnih ostataka antifašističke partizanske kulture sjećanja iz razdoblja socijalističke Jugoslavije, koji su u spomenutom razdoblju predstavljali određenu vrstu političke i društvene legitimacije, a danas se nalaze na društvenim marginama. Ta mjesta sjećanja su spomen-šuma Brezovica kraj Siska i mjesto Srb u Lici. Oba mjesta čine dio spomenute kulture sjećanja na konkretnom primjeru, a ja ću nastojati objasniti njihovo današnje značenje i simboliku u modernom hrvatskom društvu, prikazom odnosa suprotstavljenih sjećanja suvremenika tih događaja, razgovorom s dvojicom uglednih povjesničara te analizom različitih povijesnih interpretacija konkretnih događaja. Analizom medijskih istupa političara te predstavnika građanskih inicijativa na spomenutim komemoracijama, nastojat ću prikazati odnose suprotstavljenih povijesnih intepretacija te konačno i odnos hrvatske političke elite prema antifašističkoj kulturnoj baštini. Cilj ovog rada jest prikaz i analiza problematike čuvanja i komemoriranja sjećanja, važnosti kulture sjećanja u društvenoj zajednici, različitih interpretacija povjesničara, odnosa između političke moći i povijesnih narativa te upotrebe kulture sjećanja u svrhu političkih interesa. Kroz rad ću pokušati odgovoriti na sljedeća pitanja: - što sve čini kulturu sjećanja; - današnji status i značenje antifašističke kulture sjećanja; - suprotstavljene povijesne
Recommended publications
  • Balkan Express 2019: Living Together — Tolerance, Coexistence, Reconciliation”
    5th International Balkan studies Conference Living together ― Tolerance, Coexistence, Balkan Reconciliation Express ↘ Institutional support: ↓ CONFERENCE PROGRAM Faculty of Humanities, Charles University ↓ November 8—9, 2019 Institute of Ethnology of the Czech Academy Institute of Ethnology of Sciences of the CAS, Na Florenci 3, ↓ Institute of History Prague, Czech of the Czech Academy of Sciences Republic → The Institute of International Studies, Conference language: English Faculty of Social Sciences, Contact: [email protected] Charles University ↖ Czech Association of Slavic, Balkan and Byzantine Studies Organizing committee: PhDr. Dana Bittnerová, Csc. PhDr. Mirjam Moravcová, DrSc. Mgr. Ivana Skenderija Mgr. Markéta Slavková, PhD. František Šístek, M. A., Ph.D. Living together ― Tolerance, Coexistence, Balkan Reconciliation Express Friday, November 8, 2019 LOWER HALL UPPER HALL CONFERENCE ROOM 5th FLOOR 8:00 — 9:00 Registration 9:00 — 9:20 Conference opening 9:30 — 11:00 Panel 1 Panel 1 Film Yugoslavism 1 Reconciliation 1 Bottle Herders Gabriela Fatková 11:00 — 11:15 Coffee break 11:15 — 12:45 Panel 2 Panel 2 Film Yugoslavism 2 Reconciliation 2 Visual Anthropology Center – VAC (Belgrade) 12:45 — 14:00 Lunch 14:00 — 15:30 Panel 3 Panel 3 Film Constructing Family and Visual Collective Identities Community Anthropology Center – VAC (Belgrade) 15:30 — 15:45 Coffee break 15:45 — 17:15 Panel 4 Keynote speaker lecture Ivan Čolović 17:15 — 17:30 Wine & snacks/ break 17:30 — 18:00 Exhibition opening Monte Bianco Negro 18:00 Live music
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Changes -Programme
    THE EIGHT INTERNATONAL CONFERENCE THE BRIDGES OF MEDIA EDUCATION 2016 DIGITAL MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES AND SOCIO - EDUCATIONAL CHANGES -PROGRAMME - Friday, 27 May 2016 13.00 Registration 13.30 Opening Cinema Hall 13.40 – 14.30 Plenary speaker session Cinema Hall Dino Abazović, Bosnia and Herzegovina CONFRONTING THE PAST: REMEMBRANCE AND SOCIAL CHANGE 14.30 - 15.00 Lunch 15.00 – 16.30 Session 1: Changing landscapes of information and participation Room 307 In BSC languages Moderator: Vladimir Barović, University of Novi Sad, Serbia LejlaTurčilo, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina "PRESS-O-SAURUSES" IN ONLINE ENVIRONMENT: THE FUTURE OF BH. PRESS IN THE DIGITAL ERA Vladimir Barović, University of Novi Sad, Serbia TABLOID MEDIA REPORTING DURING FLOODS AND MISUSE OF THE CHILDREN Ljubomir Zuber, University of East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina DOES A UNIQUE SYSTEM OF PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN BIH CAN SURVIVE? Danka Ninković Slavnić, University of Belgrade, Serbia ONLINE SPACES FOR NEWS TALK Milan Vukadinović, University of Novi Sad, Serbia SOCIAL NETWORKS AND PERSPECTIVES OF DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY 15.00 – 16.30 Session 2: Youth and education Room 222 In BSC languages Moderator: Dragana Pavlović, University of Niš, Serbia Jasmina Arsenijević, Preschool Teacher Training College in Kikinda, Serbia Milica Andevski, University of Novi Sad, Serbia CREATIVITY ON THE INTERNET Vuk Kešelj, University of Novi Sad, Serbia MEDIA LITERACY OF JOURNALISM STUDENTS IN THE REGION Kornelija Ćeran, University of Novi Sad, Serbia ROMA YOUTH AND ONLINE PARTICIPATORY
    [Show full text]
  • Tito, Yugoslavia, and Communism: Historical Revisionism of the Second World War and Its Competing Memories
    Tito, Yugoslavia, and Communism: Historical Revisionism of the Second World War and its Competing Memories A thesis submitted by Damir Vucicevic In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History TUFTS UNIVERSITY May 2017 Advisor: Peter Winn i ABSTRACT The Second World War had a traumatizing effect on Yugoslavia and its people. In addition to being partitioned by Italy, Germany, and other foreign powers, Yugoslavia also experienced a bloody, fratricidal war. In the aftermath of the Second World War, the communist Partisans of Yugoslavia, who were victorious against the Nazi occupying powers, attempted to heal the country’s wounds by preaching brotherhood and unity amongst the different nationalities. However, for some, the period after WWII and before the break up of the country in 1990s, was nothing but an illusive compromise. By the 1990s, competing claims of victimhood resurfaced, fostered by anti-communist, neo-fascist political elites who advocated for Yugoslavia’s disintegration. Since then, history books have been revised, socialist-era narratives have been challenged, and sites of memory relating to Tito and Yugoslavia have been destroyed, all which has resulted in dissonant collective memories. This thesis assesses how memories of WWII contributed to the violence of the 1990s and discusses the role of new ruling elites in creating myths of victimhood in order to justify their own power, as well as armed conflict, ethnic cleansing, and political polarization. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to the people who have supported me in my writing journey. First, I would like to thank Professor Peter Winn, who inspired me to write this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Feminist Reading of Post-Yugoslav Literature
    From: Tijana Matijevic From Post-Yugoslavia to the Female Continent A Feminist Reading of Post-Yugoslav Literature November 2020, 280 p., pb., Klebebindung 70,00 € (DE), 978-3-8376-5209-3 E-Book: PDF: 69,99 € (DE), ISBN 978-3-8394-5209-7 This study of contemporary literature from the former Yugoslavia (Post-Yugoslavia) fol- lows the ways in which the feminist writing of gender, body, sexuality, and social and cultural hierarchies brings to light the past of socialist Yugoslavia, its cultural and litera- ry itineraries and its dissolution in the Yugoslav wars. The analysis also focuses on the particularities of different feminist writings, together with their picturing of possible futures. The title of the book suggests an attempt to interpret post-Yugoslav literature as feminist writing, but also a process of conceptualizing a post-Yugoslav literary field, in this study represented by contemporary fiction from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, and Serbia. Tijana Matijevic (PhD), is independent researcher currently teaching post-Yugoslav lite- rature, culture, and languages at the Friedrich Schiller University of Jena and the Mar- tin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg. Her research focuses on the feminist writing and the continuities between the Yugoslav and post-Yugoslav literatures. For further information: www.transcript-verlag.de/en/978-3-8376-5209-3 © 2020 transcript Verlag, Bielefeld Contents I Introduction: On Post-Yugoslavia and the Female Continent ........................ 7 I 1. Post-Yugoslav Literature: A Utopia and a Field........................................15 I 2. A Feminist Framing of the post-Yugoslav Literary Field .............................. 23 I 3. Summary .......................................................................... 32 II Women’s Writing and Critical Nostalgia: On Ildiko Lovas’ Fiction ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Download (1061Kb)
    Manuscript version: Author’s Accepted Manuscript The version presented in WRAP is the author’s accepted manuscript and may differ from the published version or Version of Record. Persistent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/124068 How to cite: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it. Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. Publisher’s statement: Please refer to the repository item page, publisher’s statement section, for further information. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected]. warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications Bringing the Left Back: Radical Performances of Dissent from the Remains of ex-Yugoslavia Silvija Jestrović This essay focuses on the leftist cultural expressions that emerged from excavations of the legacy of socialist Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Friendship
    SUNDAY (8.5.) MONDAY (9.5.) TUESDAY (10.5.) WEDNESDAY (11.5.) THURSDAY (12.5.) FRIDAY (13.5.) SATURDAY (14.5.) SUNDAY (15.5.) SUBVERSIVE FILM FESTIVAL 20:00 19:00 19:00 18:00 18:00 18:00 17:00 16:00 Cinema Europe – Large hall THE FESTIVAL OPENING In the Last Days of the City Deadweight The Never Ending Factory of A Maid for Each Dreams of the Salt Lake The Woods Dreams are Made Yellow Fever Between Fences Tamer El Said Axel Koenzen the Duomo Maher Abi Samra Andrea Segre of Konstantina Kotzamani Egypt/ Germany/GB/United Arab Avi Mograbi Germany/ Finland, 2016, 88’ Massimo D’Anolfi & Martina Lebanon/France/Norway/United Arab Italy, 2015, 72’ Claire Simon Greece, 2015, 17’ Emirates, 2016, 118’ Emirates, 2016, 67’ France/Switzerland, 2015, 144’ Israel/France, 2016, 85’ Parenti Boat Casanova Italy, 2015, 74’ Karim Sayad 21:00 20:00 Switzerland, 2015, 35’ 21:00 Homo sapiens 20:00 Public discussion: He Who 20:00 Brothers of the Night Nikolaus Geyrhalter 20:00 Road to Istanbul Whistles Means No Harm Baden Baden The Fox Exploits the Tiger’s Patric Chiha Austria, 2016, 94’ As I Open My Eyes Rachid Bouchareb Speakers: Florence Hartmann, Rachel Lang Might Austria, 2016, 88’ Leyla Bouzid Algeria/France/Belgium, 2016, 98’ Jennifer Schulte and Jillian C. Belgium/France, 2016, 94’ Lucky Kuswandi Tunisia/ France/ Belgium/ United Arab York Indonesia, 2015, 25’ Emirates, 2015, 102’ 22:00 22:00 Just Another Day in Egypt Nikola Ilić & Corina I Am the People 22:00 Suntan Schwingruber Ilić 22:00 Anna Roussillon Much Loved Argyris Papadimitropoulos Switzerland, 2015, 11’ Paris 05:59 France, 2014, 111’ Nabil Ayouch Greece, 2016, 104’ Olivier Ducastel & Jacques France/ Morocco, 2015, 104’ Paris Belongs to Us Martineau Damir Radić France, 2016, 97’ Croatia, 2016, 5’ 18:00 Lampedusa Philip Cartelli & Mariangela Ciccarello Italy/France/USA, 2015, 14’ E.T.E.R.N.I.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Friendship
    MONDAY (2.5.) TUESDAY (3.5.) WEDNESDAY (4.5.) THURSDAY (5.5.) FRIDAY (6.5.) SATURDAY (7.5.) SUNDAY (9.5.) TUESDAY (10.5.) WEDNESDAY (11.5.) THURSDAY (12.5.) FRIDAY (13.5.) 13:00 – 15:00 11:00 – 13:00 10:00 – 14:00 16:00 – 18:00 11:00 – 13:30 13:00 – 15:00 20:00 – 22:00 19:35 19:30 16:00 – 18:00 TTIP, CETA, and How to Against the Hotspots – A Presentation of the Open Book promotion: The The Trade Unions’ Role League of the Balkan Panel discussion: Western Public discussion: Public discussion: Public discussion: Stop Them? (Part I) View from the City, Taste of Home, and Anti-Capitalist in the Society Left Delegates (Part I) Sahara: 40 Years of Freedom of Speech, Whistleblowers – the Macedonian Democracy Panel discussion organized Mediterranean other initiatives Cookbook by the Speakers: Frank Zach Organizations: IDS Struggle for Freedom in Dissent and Satire in the Croatian Perspective - Between Revolution by the Centre for Speakers: Gianluca Rebellion, Solidarity, Croatian Workers’ (Confederation of German (Initiative for Democratic the Last African Colony Digital Age Speakers: Bojan Bajić, and Euthanasia Democratisation in Solera (Italy), Ibrahim Politics – Proposals for Front (RF) Trade Unions), Gabriele Socialism), RF (Workers’ Speakers: Muhamed Speakers: Morana Saša Leković, Ivan Key speaker: Xhabir collaboration with the Heggi (Egypt), Good Immigration Author: RF - collective Bischoff (European Front), BRID Malainin, Đuro Gavran, Miljanović, Borna Sor, Novosel and Mark Worth Deralla, the leader of the Centre for Peace Emina Bužinkić (Croatia), Policies Speakers: Mate Kapović, Economic and Social (Organization for Workers’ Tvrtko Jakovina Matthew Stender and CIVIL association (Skopje) Studies, GONG and Mohammed Abduallah Speakers: Ivan Ergić, Luka Matić Committee), Darko Initiative and Moderator: Jerko Jillian C.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of Courses for ERASMUS+ Incoming Students from the U. of Maynooth at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, CROATIA
    Selection of courses for ERASMUS+ incoming students from the U. of Maynooth at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, CROATIA Department subject ECTS level department Josip Vrandečić Early modern European and World History 4 Undergraduate History Aleksandar Jakir Croatian History 1918-1945 5 Undergraduate History Political portraits and biographies from the first half of the Aleksandar Jakir Croatian 20th century 2 Undergraduate History Dalmatian ports and the relations between two sides of the Dragan Markovina Adriatic at the turn of the 18th to the 19th centiry 2 Undergraduate History Dragan Markovina Social History of Dalmatia in the 16th and the 17th century 2 Undergraduate History Marko Rimac Migrations within Dalmatia in the modern age 2 Undergraduate History Marko Rimac History of Croatian Glagolitism 2 Undergraduate History Ivan Matijević Roman soldiers in Salonae 2 Undergraduate History Dragan Markovina Historiography of Early Age Mediterranean 2 Undergraduate History Ivan Basić Kršćanstvo i crkva u Dalmaciji u ranom srednjem vijeku 2 Undergraduate History Josip Vrandečić European and World History in the 19th Century 4 Undergraduate History Josip Vrandečić Venetian Dalmatia in the 18th century 2 Undergraduate History Josip Vrandečić History of the Venetian Republic 2 Undergraduate History Aleksandar Jakir Croatian History after 1945 5 Undergraduate History Nikola Gamuzina Urban historical geography 2 Graduate History Josip Vrandečić The Adriatic area and the Ottoman empire 4 Graduate History Aleksandar
    [Show full text]
  • Dragan Markovina DOBA KONTRAREVOLUCIJE
    DOBA KONTRAREVOLUCIJE Dragan Markovina DOBA KONTRAREVOLUCIJE 1 Dragan Markovina Izdavaè RAZLOG d.o.o. Biblioteka Tako je bilo Urednica MIRA UVAR Oblikovanje korica BORIVOJ DOVNIKOVIÆ BORDO Fotografija autora knjige TANJA DRAKIÆ SARIÆ 2 DOBA KONTRAREVOLUCIJE Dragan Markovina DOBA KONTRA REVOLUCIJE RAZLOG Zagreb, 2017. 3 Dragan Markovina 4 DOBA KONTRAREVOLUCIJE SADRAJ Predgovor Viktora Ivanèiæa Èovjek s èekiæem u nacionalnom spomen-parku ...................... 15 1. UVOD ....................................................................................... 21 Zatiranje republikanizma ili kako je sve poèelo ................... 29 Druga kulturna revolucija ..................................................... 32 Prolost kao supermarket ...................................................... 35 Zajednièki revizionistièki narativ na postjugoslavenskom prostoru ............................................................................ 38 2. HRVATSKA BEZ LJEVICE: IZMEÐU EKSTREMNE DESNICE I EKSTREMNOG CENTRA ................. 45 KRONOLOGIJA KONTRAREVOLUCIJE Ulièna kontrarevolucija i cinizam socijaldemokratske vlasti ................................................. 49 Poljudska moèvara ................................................................. 55 Ubrzana faizacija Slobodne Dalmacije ................................. 58 Veèernjakov obraèun sa èinjenicama ................................... 60 Otkaz Borisu Paveliæu i nedodirljivi Karamarko .................. 64 5 Dragan Markovina Rijeèko ogledalo ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Report 2020
    YOUTH INITIATIVE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA NARRATIVE REPORT 2020 YOUTH INITIATIVE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA YIHR BIH Narrative report Period: 01.01.-31.12.2020. Project Title: Youth Camps in Kozarac, Goražde and Stolac Donor: CCFD-Terre Solidaire Although faced with challenges regarding the COVID-19 outbreak, Youth Initiative for Human Rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina (YIHR BiH) was able to successfully implement and realize all its planned activities, such as Camp Kozarac and both Schools of Different Memories. Moreover, YIHR BiH organized and held activities to raise our visibility, enhance our functions and help tackle some important issues in our society. The point of these three schools is to start a conversation on themes that are being used to manipulate people in current Bosnia and Herzegovina, and this way we are empowering the youth to be the voice which will stop it. This year, participants from Bosnia and Herzegovina – due to COVID-19, the schools were restricted be on a national and not regional level – encountered themes that shape their society for the first time, or gained a different perspective on what they’ve previously heard. Moreover, the participants had the unique opportunity to socialize with their peers, thereby creating a community of youth fighting for the same cause, together. This year we had three amazing groups of young people, in which discussions and reflections were very fruitful and intense, the groups showed great responsibility towards the program and have realized the point of it. We must say that we are more than satisfied with the realization of these schools.
    [Show full text]
  • European Pulse / Calendar
    ISSN 1800-7678 European Electronic monthly magazine for European integration pulse No. 120,September 2015 FOCUS OF THIS ISSUE New law on food safety and the remaining differences between Montenegro and EU in that field Interview Editor in chief of Kosovo's “Koha Ditore”, Agron Bajrami Challenges in the EU Volkswagen not the only cheater Foreword 2 European pulse / Calendar Foreword: Compromised Council of the Anti-Corruption Agency recently appointed as its director Sreten Radonjić - a retired police official and the father in law of the daughter of the deputy president of Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS) and deputy Prime Minister Duško Marković. One of the five members of the Council, Radule Žurić, also happens to be Marković's best man. The Council interviewed the candidates in a closed session, on the request of three of four candidates. Now, Radonjić and Žurić are the people who should be in charge of controlling property records of Marković and his party comrades, checking the finances of the party that has Marković as its second in command, and protecting the potential whistleblowers from the ranks of DPS. The Agency, which is supposed to be the pillar of the fight against high-level corruption, and whose Vladan Žugić performance is among the top prerequisites for Montenegro's progress towards the EU, has been compromised at the very start - another "toothless tiger", as Slobodan Leković, the head of the Commission for the Conflict of Interests once described his own department. Radonjić's appointment and the way the parties have decided on the appointment of members to the Council is hardly a surprise, considering that similar procedures have been employed for the appointment of the majority of judges of the Constitutional Court, members of Judicial Council, Prosecutor’s Council..
    [Show full text]
  • Developing the Ontological Model for Research and Representation of Commemoration Speeches
    Developing the ontological model for research and representation of Commemoration Speeches in Croatia using a graph property database Benedikt Perak Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka Abstract This paper demonstrates the ontological model of commemoration speeches given in Croatia that was developed as a part of the project "Framing the Nation and Collective Identity in Croatia: Political Rituals and the Cultural Memory of Twentieth Century Traumas". The research gathers linguistic, media and social data about seven commemoration practices connected to the wars of the 20th century using various methodologies involving audio-visual field recordings, transcription of commemoration speeches and the creation of a text corpus. This chapter presents digital humanities methods used to connect various levels of data analysis and digital resources, from natural language processing (NLP) of Croatian to conceptual enrichment through the processing of conceptual metaphors. These resources are integrated using the Neo4j database and the Python Py2Neo library for data manipulation of the ontological model that embeds the linguistic and media research in the context respectively of the social identity of actors, their interaction, institutional affiliations and cultural models they represent and express. The value of this ontological model is in fostering an interdisciplinary approach through the contextualization of data and targeted usage of digital resources. Key words Cultural memory, commemoration, textual analysis, monument representation, social ontology, complex system, graph database, Neo4j Introduction This paper shows the methods and resources used for the digitization of commemoration speeches given in Croatia and the development of an ontological model for the retrieval and analysis of the complex socio-cultural data within the project “Framing the Nation and Collective Identity in Croatia: Political Rituals and the Cultural Memory of Twentieth Century Traumas “(FRAMNAT)1.
    [Show full text]