May & June 1980 Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Naval War College Review Volume 33 Article 25 Number 3 May-June 1980 May & June 1980 Review The .SU Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation War College, The .SU Naval (1980) "May & June 1980 Review," Naval War College Review: Vol. 33 : No. 3 , Article 25. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 1 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 2 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 3 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 PRESIDENT'S NOTES ......... Resistance to the tyranny of King Fortunately for rhe future of the George lll took many forms in the United States-and wirhour impugning beleaguered American colonies in citizen Coggeshall's show of independ November 1775. One of the more ence-an event of much greater and inrriguing accounrs, which I came across lasring moment took place in Philadel recently, concerned the individual act of phia char very week of 1775. defiance of a good citizen of Newport by The Continental Congress, on LO the name of Coggeshall. As reported in November 1775, ordered the creation of the Newport Mercury of 6 November two battalions of Marines, thereby 1775: establishing the United States Marine Earl.y lase Saturday morning Corps. One of rhe mandates of the (November 4) one Coggeshall, Continental Congress in this resolution being somewhat drunk or crazy, was char " ... particular care be taken, went on the Long-Wharf, and rhat no persons be appointed ro office, rurn'd up his backsides coward the or inlisred [sic] inro said battalions, bur bomb brig in rhis harbour, using such are good seamen, or so acquainted some insulting words; upon which with maritime affairs so as to be able co the brig fired two 4 pound shot at serve co advantage by sea when him; one of which went through required .... " the roof of Mr. Hammond's store The Marine Corps has served with on the said wharf, and lodged in disrincrion in maritime affairs since its Mr. Samuel Johnston's distillery, at birth in 1775. Here at the Naval War the N.E. part of the cove, within College, Marine officers are an the Long Wharf. The man was important part of our faculty and soon after taken up, and sent our of student body. Ar present, 26 are town. enrolled in the College of Naval The British retaliation to this Warfare, 20 are in the College of Naval singular (if unusual) act of patriotism Command and Staff and 10 serve in key could hardly be termed a measured positions on the faculty. response; indeed ir might even be Marines were present at the termed overkill. Certainly, hitting the beginnings of the Naval War College Newporrers' source of liquid refresh and have played an important role in its ment might have evoked an unwanted evolutionary development as the response by fanning faster the flames of highest professional-level educational https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25rebellion. institution in the Navy. The first4 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 5 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 6 War College: May & June 1980 Review 4 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW NATO's 30-yea-rexirtence has given it almost the character of a familiarstatue we seldom ask how it came to he. Thi; paper looks at the founding of NATO, the treaty, the organizational structure, and the military forces-what conditions reqnired and fostered NATO and why what resulted,rather than something ehe, did result. It also invites a consUeration of two not opposite questions-whether the defense of Europe ,hould be more "Europeanized"; whether NATO should be geographically and fnnctionally broadened. THE CREATION OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC ALLIANCE, 1948-1952 by Alan K. Henrikson And the earth was withouc form, European power since irs 1778 and void; and darkness was upon Revolutionary War alliance with France the face of the deep. And the Spirit dissolved by murnalagreement in 1800, of God moved upon the face of the Probably more than any other waters. Genesis 1:2. international arrangement in history, On 4 April 1949, at a ceremony in the even the League of Nations and rhe ornate Departmental Auditorium in United Nations, the North Atlantic Washington, D.C., the North Atlantic AIHance has set-not to say in a deeper Treaty was signed. For all of rhe 12 sense caused-the pattern of interna parties, European no less than North tional relations that we in the Atlantic American, rhe pact-a peacetime world today tend to take forgranted. It military coalition transoceanic in has been regarded-rightly-as a major scope-was unprecedented. Not since core of international stability. "To the breakup in 1822 of the Quadruple protect this area against war,'' declared Alliance against a Bonapartist resur President Truman at the signing gence in France had Europe known such ceremony, "will be a long step toward a strong grouping of Great Powers in permanent peace in the whole world." 1 peace. In 1947 the United States had Nonerheless, there is a growing signed the Treaty of Rio de Janeiro to apprehension that the Atlantic protect the Western Hemisphere, bur it AlJiance, confined as it is in member had not been formally linked with any ship, geography, and function, may be This arricle is based on a paper delivered orallyat The Newport lnstirute Conference-"Is There a Need For an Alternadve to NATO?''-on 10 November 1979. The autho.wishes tu thank the partkipants in that meeting .uwell as othec persons who havecommemed on the basic text. Besides several colleagues at The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomaty, these .includeTheodore C. Achilles, James M. Gavin, Lord Gladwyn, AndrewJ. Goodpaster,Ernest A. Gross, AlfredM.Gruenther,JohnD. Hickerson, Lord Inchyra, George R Kennan, Lyman L. Lemnirzer, Robert A. Lovctr, and Francis 0. Wikox. For any remaining errorsPublished of historical by U.S. Naval fa<:t or War intcr Collegeprerarion, Digital of course,Commons, the author1980 alone is responsible. 7 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 8 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 9 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 10 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 11 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 12 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 13 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 14 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 15 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 16 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 17 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 18 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 19 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 20 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 21 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 22 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 23 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 24 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 25 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 26 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 27 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 28 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 29 Naval War College Review, Vol. 33 [1980], No. 3, Art. 25 https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol33/iss3/25 30 War College: May & June 1980 Review Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 1980 31 Naval War College Review, Vol.