DOCSLIB.ORG

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade RESTRICTED AGREEMENT ON TAR/W/8/Rev.3 GENERAL 15 October 1981 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution Committee on Tariff Concessions IMPLEMENTATION OF MTN CONCESSIONS Note by the Secretariat Revision The following List of dates for the implementation of tariff concessions granted in the Multilateral Trade Negotiations has been compiled on the basis of material available in the secretariat. The list normally indicates the date for the first tariff cut; following cuts would be implemented according to the generaL staging rules in paragraph 2(a) of the Geneva (1979) Protocol and the Supplementary Protocol, unless otherwise indicated. Special staging rules for particular types of products are not indicated but a reference to the Schedule concerned is made, where relevant. The indication "entry into force of bindings" signifies that the concessions became Legally valid on the date indicated but that no reduction was made at that date, the applied rates already being at or below the level of the concession. Governments for which the list indicates that no information is available or that a decision by Parliament on the implementation has not yet been taken are invited to inform the secretariat as soon as possible of their intentions in respect of the implementation. TAR/W/8/ Rev. 3 Page 2 GENEVA (1979) PROTOCOL Date of acceptance Date for the first reduction AUSTRIA 28 December 1979 1 JuLy 1980 (two stages)* ARGENTINA 11 July 1979 1 January 1980 (whoLe reduction) CANADA ? September 1981 1 January 1980* CZECHOSLOVAKIA 16 June 1980 1 July 1980 (one fourth of total cuts; remaining three fourths on 1.1.82, 1.1.84 and 1.1.86 respectively) EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 17 December 1979 1 January 1980* FINLAND 13 March 1980 1 January 1980* HUNGARY 17 December 1979 1 January 1980* ICELAND 15 April 1980 1 January 1980 (whole reduction) JAMAICA 12 December 1979 1 January 1980 (entry into force of bindings)* J APAN 25 April 1980 26 April 1980 (two stages)* NEW ZEALAND 17 December 1979 1 January 1980 (whole reduction) NORWAY 28 December 1979 1 January 1980 ROMANIA 25 June 1980 16 June 1980 (two stages)* SOUTH AFRICA 18 December 1979 1 February 1980 (whole reduction) SPAIN 19 June 1981 1 July 1980 (two stages)* SWEDEN 20 December 1979 1 February 1980 (two stages)* SWITZERLAND 17 December 1979 1 January 1980* UNITED STATES 20 December 1979 1 January 1980* YUGOSLAVIA 2 June 1981 Date of acceptance (entry into force of bindings) * See special staging rules in Schedule. TAR/W/8/Rev. 3 Page 3 SUPPLEMENTARY PROTOCOL Date of acceptance Date for the first reduction AUSTRALIA 31 March 1980 1 January 1980 (whoLe reduction) BRAZIL 23 June 1981 No information available CANADA 1 September 1981 See Geneva (1979) ProtocoL above CHILE 12 March 1981 1 JuLy 1980 (whole reduction)* DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 23 November 1979 1 October 1984 and 1 October 1986 (in both cases whole reduction) EGYPT 29 October 1980 29 October 1980 EEC 17 December 1979 See Geneva (1979) Protocol above HAITI Not yet accepted 1 January 1985 (whole reduction) INDIA 24 April 1980 1 January 1980 (entry into force of bindings) INDONESIA 20 November 1979 Date of acceptance (entry into force of bindings) ISRAEL 14 September 19.81 1 January 1987 (whole reduction) IVORY COAST 16 September 1981 Date of acceptance (entry into force of bindings) KOREA 6 January 1981 6 January 1981 (two stages) MALAYSIA 16 June 1980 1 January 1980 (entry into force of bindings) PAKISTAN 21 May 1981 No information available PERU 8 February 1980 8 Feb. Cry 1980 (entry into force of bindings) SINGAPORE 1 February 1980 1 January 1980 (entry into force of bindings) SPAIN 19 June 1981 See Geneva (1979) Protocol above URUGUAY 16 June 1980 16 June 1980 (entry into force of bindings) ZAIRE Not yet accepted No information available SCHEDULE OF BULGARIA BULGARIA 27 November 1979 1 January 1981 (whole reduction) See special staging rules in Schedule. TAR/W/8/Rev.3 Page 4 ACCESSION PROTOCOLS Date of acceptance Date for the -irst reduction COLOMBIA 3 September 1981 Date of acceptance (entry into force of bindings) PHILIPPINES 27 November 1979 1 January 1980* (entry into force of Protocol on 27 December 1979) * See special staging rules in Schedule..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crime, Law Enforcement, and Punishment
    Shirley Papers 48 Research Materials, Crime Series Inventory Box Folder Folder Title Research Materials Crime, Law Enforcement, and Punishment Capital Punishment 152 1 Newspaper clippings, 1951-1988 2 Newspaper clippings, 1891-1938 3 Newspaper clippings, 1990-1993 4 Newspaper clippings, 1994 5 Newspaper clippings, 1995 6 Newspaper clippings, 1996 7 Newspaper clippings, 1997 153 1 Newspaper clippings, 1998 2 Newspaper clippings, 1999 3 Newspaper clippings, 2000 4 Newspaper clippings, 2001-2002 Crime Cases Arizona 154 1 Cochise County 2 Coconino County 3 Gila County 4 Graham County 5-7 Maricopa County 8 Mohave County 9 Navajo County 10 Pima County 11 Pinal County 12 Santa Cruz County 13 Yavapai County 14 Yuma County Arkansas 155 1 Arkansas County 2 Ashley County 3 Baxter County 4 Benton County 5 Boone County 6 Calhoun County 7 Carroll County 8 Clark County 9 Clay County 10 Cleveland County 11 Columbia County 12 Conway County 13 Craighead County 14 Crawford County 15 Crittendon County 16 Cross County 17 Dallas County 18 Faulkner County 19 Franklin County Shirley Papers 49 Research Materials, Crime Series Inventory Box Folder Folder Title 20 Fulton County 21 Garland County 22 Grant County 23 Greene County 24 Hot Springs County 25 Howard County 26 Independence County 27 Izard County 28 Jackson County 29 Jefferson County 30 Johnson County 31 Lafayette County 32 Lincoln County 33 Little River County 34 Logan County 35 Lonoke County 36 Madison County 37 Marion County 156 1 Miller County 2 Mississippi County 3 Monroe County 4 Montgomery County
    [Show full text]
  • Download JANUARY 1980.Pdf
    JANUARY 1980 ---,. ­ LAW ENFORCEMENT BUllETIN JANUARY 1980, VOLUME 49, NUMBER 1 Contents Forensic Science 1 Speaker Identification (Part 1) Three Methods- Listening, Machine, and Aural­Visual By Bruce E. Koenig, Special Agent, Technical Services Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C. 8 Hypnosis: The FBI's Team Approach By Richard L. Ault, Jr., Special Agent, Behavioral Science Unit, FBI Academy, Quantico, Va. Crime Problems 9 Automobile Theft: An Increasing Crime Problem By Samuel J. Rozzi, Commissioner of Police, Nassau County, N.Y. , and Det. Sgt. Richard Mueller, Police Department, Nassau County, N.Y. Facilities 14 The Canadian Police College By Charles W. Steinmetz, Special Agent, Education and Communication Arts Unit, FBI Academy, Quantico, Va. Point of View 19 Higher Education for Police Officers By Thomas A. Reppetto, Ph. D., Vice President and Professor of Criminal Justice Administration, John Jay College, New York, N.Y. The Legal Digest 28 The Constitutionality of Routine License Check Stops- A Review of Delaware v. Prouse By Daniel L. Schofield, Special Agent, Legal Counsel Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C. 2S Wanted by the FBI The Cover: Federal Bureau of Investigation Published by the Public Affairs Office, Voiceprints­finger- United States Department of Justice Homer A. Boynton, Jr., prints of the future or Executive Assistant Director Washington, D.C. 20535 investigative tool for Editor-Thomas J. Deakin today? See story William H. Webster, Director Assistant Editor-Kathryn E. Sulewski page 1. Art Director-Carl A. Gnam, Jr. Writer/Editor-Karen McCarron The Attorney General has determined that the publication Production Manager-Jeffery L.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Technical Papers
    Program Reports Report Title Copies Number Number 1: Program Prospectus. December 1963. 2 Program Design Report. February 1965. 2 Number 2: Supplement: 1968-1969 Work Program. February 1968. 1 Supplement: 1969-1970 Work Program. May 1969. 0 Number 3: Cost Accounting Manual. February 1965. 1 Number 4: Organizational Manual. February 1965. 2 Guide Plan: Central Offices for the Executive Branch of State Number 5: 2 Government. April1966. XIOX Users Manual for the IBM 7090/7094 Computer. November Number 6: 2 1966. Population Projections for the State of Rhode Island and its Number 7: 2 Municipalities--1970-2000. December 1966. Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space (Interim Report). Number 8: 2 February 1968. Rhode Island Transit Plan: Future Mass Transit Services and Number 9: 2 Facilities. June 1969. Plan for the Development and Use of Public Water Supplies. Number 10: 1 September 1969. Number 11: Plan for Public Sewerage Facility Development. September 1969. 2 Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space (Second Interim Number 12: 2 Report). May 1970. Number 13: Historic Preservation Plan. September 1970. 2 Number 14: Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space. January 1971. 2 Number 15: A Department of Transportation for Rhode Island. March 1971. 2 State Airport System Plan (1970-1990). Revised Summary Report. Number 16: 2 December 1974. Number 17: Westerly Economic Growth Center, Planning Study. February 1973. 1 Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space--Supplement. June Number 18: 2 1973. Number 19: Rhode Island Transportation Plan--1990. January 1975. 2 Number 20: Solid Waste Management Plan. December 1973. 2 1 Number 21: Report of the Trail Advisory Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Revitalization of Inner City Housing Through Property Tax Exemption: New York City’S J-51 to the Rescue Janice C
    Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law Volume 18 January 1980 Revitalization of Inner City Housing Through Property Tax Exemption: New York City’s J-51 to the Rescue Janice C. Griffith Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Janice C. Griffith, Revitalization of Inner City Housing Through Property Tax Exemption: New York City’s J-51 to the Rescue, 18 Urb. L. Ann. 153 (1980) Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw/vol18/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REVITALIZATION OF INNER CITY HOUSING THROUGH PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION AND ABATEMENT: NEW YORK CITY'S J-51 TO THE RESCUE* JANICE C GRIFFITH* * I. INTRODUCTION A. The Rental Housing Situation in New York City in 1975 When the municipal bond market closed its door to New York City in the spring of 1975,' it shut out the city's program of providing mortgage loans to finance newly constructed and rehabilitated hous- ing for low- and middle-income people. New York City could no longer act as a banker; the principal resource upon2 which the city had relied to solve its housing problems was gone. Despite the infusion of more than one billion dollars over twenty * The opinions expressed in this Article are those of the author and do not neces- sarily represent those of New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN June 1980 REHABILITATION
    WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REGIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE EM/RC30/10 EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN June 1980 Thirtieth Session ORIGINAL : ENGLISH Agenda item 11 REHABILITATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Definition 1 Rehabilitation: A Team Responsibility The Team Approach Early Intervention Emotional and Social Impact Tradi tinnal Snni a1 Praeti ce Dependence on Institutions Economic Rehabilitation Increasing Demand 1981 - International Year of the Disabled . WHO - UNICEF Intexest WHO/EMRO Activity Conclusion Definition The word rehabilitation originates, according to Webster's Dictionary, from the Latin word "rehabiZiture" meaning "to restore". The wnrd i 4 a composite of the Latin prefix "r>et' meaning "againtt and "hubCZitme" meaning "to make suitable". In other words "b~rehabiZitatel' means to restore a person to a former capacity. The dictionary definition is important as it indicates the necessity of considering rehabilitati.0~as involving the "whole" person, It implies not only the restoratinn nf phyqical deficiencies, but also the retraining of handicapped persons and the provision of the appropriate psycho- logical and social support to repair traumatized mental states. Rehabilitation: A Team Responsibility Formal interest in rehabilitation is a comparatively modern phenomenon. In the past, it mainly concerned the problems of veterans returning from wars; this has led to the present tremendous interest. However, thc importance of rehabilitation tu ir~clus~rialdrvelopmenc Is obvious, when the heavy price in taxes and insurance for failure to absorb disabled persons into the economy is considered. ~ost/benefitstudies have shown that significant savings can be achieved by returning handicapped persons to sheltered or suitable jobs in industry. The Team Approach The full concept of rehabilitation immediately makes us aware that it is not a task for a single individual.
    [Show full text]
  • And Finance 84 Contents 5
    \R I DA-1l\Tl 20081 Public Disclosure Authorized A, Public Disclosure Authorized .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~9. .;; . , ~ -m Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized WORLDBANK World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 Cover: Construction of schools forms an important component of a $19 million IDA credit to Sri Lanka for the development of irrigated agriculture through diversion of the waters of the country's major river, the Mahaweli Ganga. This photo shows a teacher and part of her class in one of the schools built for the Mahaweli Ganga scheme's colonists. Frontispiece: A worker seen through a cylinder Photo Credits designed for an oil refinery and manufactured by Cover: Ray Witlin Bharat Heavy Electricals, Ltd. of Hyderabad, Frontispiece: Ray Witlin India. A $40 million Bank loan, channeled Page 27: James Pickerell through the Industrial Development Bank of India Page 36: Ray Witlin through.theDevelopment industrial Bank of India Page 41: Peter Muncie to state financial corporations provided the Page 47: Mary M. Hill foreign exchange needed by small and medium- Page 55: William Graham sized industries for the purchase of imported Page 61: Jaime Martin-Escobal capital goods. Page 73: Ray Witlin 3 The World Bank The World Bank is a group of three of the World Bank, and 121 of them have joined institutions, the International Bank for to date. The funds used by IDA, called credits Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), to distinguish them from Bank loans, come the International Development Association mostly in the form of subscriptions, general (IDA), and the International Finance replenishments from IDA's more industrialized Corporation (IFC).
    [Show full text]
  • ENTERING the 1980S: FISCAL POLICY CHOICES
    1 ENTERING THE 1980s: January 1980 FISCAL POLICY CHOICES A Report to the Senate and House Committees on the Budget NOTICE -Part I There Should Be No Release of This Document Until 10 a.m. (E.S.T.) As Required by Public Law 93-344 Tuesday, January 29, 1980 CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE ENTERING THE 1980s: FISCAL POLICY CHOICES The Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 PREFACE The Congressional Budget Office is required by Section 202(f) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-344) to submit an annual report on budgetary options. This year, the report is in two parts: Entering the 1980s; Fiscal Policy Choices and Five-Year Budget Projections; Fiscal Years 1981-1985. Part I, Entering the 1980s; Fiscal Policy Choices, is one of a series of reports on the state of the economy issued periodi- cally by the Congressional Budget Office. In accordance with CBO's mandate to provide objective analysis, the report contains no recommendations. The report was prepared by George Iden, Joan Schneider, Frank Russek, Stephen Zeller, Lawrence DeMilner, Nariman Behravesh, Peter Taylor, Marvin Phaup, Robert Dennis, William Pegram, Antoinette Gibbons, Peter Johnson, Susan Helper, and Carol Timko , under the direction of William J. Beeman and James E. Annable, Jr. Robert L. Faherty and Francis S. Pierce edited the manuscript; Dorothy J. Kornegay, Debra M. Blagburn, Kathleen M. Quinn, and Marsha L. Mottesheard patiently typed the many drafts. Alice M.
    [Show full text]
  • Jules Borker (Preliminary Ruling Requested by the Conseil De L'ordre Des Avocats À La Cour De Paris)
    ORDER OF THE COURT OF 18 JUNE 1980 1 Jules Borker (preliminary ruling requested by the Conseil de l'Ordre des Avocats à la Cour de Paris) "Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bar Council" Case 138/80 Preliminary rulings — Reference to the Court — National court within the meaning of Art. 177 of the Treaty— Concept (EEC Treaty, Art. 177) A reference cannot be made to the Court Avocats [Bar Council] has before it, not in pursuance of Article 177 of the EEC a case which it is under a legal duty to Treaty except by a court or tribunal try, but a request for a declaration which is called upon to give judgment in relating to a dispute between a member proceedings intended to lead to a of the Bar and the courts or tribunals of decision of a judicial nature. That is not another Member State. the case where a Conseil de l'Ordre des In Case 138/80 (Reference for a preliminary ruling requested by the Conseil de l'Ordre des Avocats à la Cour de Paris) JULES BORKER 1 — Language of the Case: French. 1975 ORDER OF 18. 6. 1980 — CASE 138/80 1. By a decision of 27 May 1980, which was received at the Court on 9 June 1980, the Conseil de l'Ordre des Avocats à la Cour de Paris [Bar Council of the Cour de Paris], referring to Article 177 of the EEC Treaty, submitted to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpret­ ation of Article 59 et seq.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps Cited by Congress When Designating Wilderness
    Maps Summary Table In 2003 long-time NPS Wilderness Coordinator Wes Henry prepared this table that was intended for inclusion in the updated Reference Manual 41 – Wilderness Management. Wes died soon thereafter. PEER has updated the table to reflect information through 2014. RM 41: Section F: DRAFT January 21, 2003 Maps Cited by Congress when Designating Wilderness. The table lists in: Column 2: maps cited by Congress when designating NPS wilderness (in chronological order by date of enactment); Column 3: date of an official legal description prepared after designation, and Column 4: whether a post-enactment official boundary map was prepared. NPS AREA – CONGRESSIONAL DATE OF DATE OF WILDERNESS MAP NUMBER OFFICIAL OFFICAL MAP DATE AND DATE, CITED LEGAL IN LAW DESCRIPTION Craters of the 131-91,000 December 1970 NPS cited Moon – Oct. 1970 March 1970 legislative map Petrified Forest - NP-PF-3320-O December 1970 NPS cited October 1970 November 1967 legislative map Lava Beds – NM-LB-3227H December 1972 NPS cited October 1972 August 1972 legislative map Lassen Volcanic – NP-LV-9013C June 1973 NPS cited October 1972 August 1972 legislative map Point Reyes – 612-90,000-B May 1978 February 1977 October 1976 September 1976 Bandelier – 315-20,014-B August 1978 August 1978 October 1976 May 1976 Black Canyon of 144-20,017 January 1977 January 1977 the Gunnison – May 1973 October 1976 Chiricahua - 145-20,007-A May 1978 January 1977 October 1976 September 1973 Great Sand Dunes 140-20,006-C December 1976; January 1980 October 1976 February 1976 Revised:
    [Show full text]
  • WHCA Video Log
    WHCA Video Log Tape # Date Title Format Duration Network C1 9/23/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #1 (Tape 1) In Philadelphia, Domestic Issues BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 ABC C2 9/23/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #1 (Tape 2) In Philadelphia, Domestic Issues BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C3 10/6/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #2 In San Francisco, Foreign Policy BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 ABC C4 10/15/1976 Mondale/Dole Debate BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 NBC C5 10/17/1976 Face the Nation with Walter Mondale BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 CBS C6 10/22/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #3 At William & Mary, not complete BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 NBC C7 11/1/1976 Carter Election Special BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C8 11/3/1976 Composite tape of Carter/Mondale activities 11/2-11/3/1976 BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 CBS C9 11/4/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ALL C10 11/7/1976 Ski Scene with Walter Mondale BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 WMAL C11 11/7/1976 Agronsky at Large with Mondale & Dole BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 WETA C12 11/29/1976 CBS Special with Cronkite & Carter BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 CBS C13 12/3/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ALL C14 12/13/1976 Mike Douglas Show with Lillian and Amy Carter BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 CBS C15 12/14/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ALL C16 12/14/1976 Barbara Walters Special with Peters/Streisand and Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ABC Page 1 of 92 Tape # Date Title Format Duration Network C17 12/16/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C18 12/21/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ALL C19 12/23/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C20 12/29/1976 Good Morning America with Carter and Cabinet Members (Tape 1) BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ABC C21 12/29/1976 Good Morning America with Carter and Cabinet Members (Tape 2) Digital Files, Umatic 60 ABC C22 1/4/1977 Dinah Shore Show with Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • TREASURY FINANCING REQUIREMENTS October - December 1979 $Bil
    TREASURY FINANCING REQUIREMENTS October - December 1979 $Bil. $Bil. Uses Sources Redemptions of Special Issues ^^ 51 y2 %Gov't Account Sales Y2 Vl 50 50 40 — Coupon Maturities | 4 Coupon Refundings —40 Foreign Savings Bonds Nonmarketables 30 30 1 Va 20 Net Market Borrowingt 20 i Cash Deficit 10 10 Decrease in Cash Balance | 0 0 11 Includes maturing marketable securities of $'/4 billion. Office of the Secretary of the Treasury Office of Government Financing January 29, 1980-19 TREASURY FINANCING REQUIREMENTS January - March 1980^ $Bil. $Bil. Uses Sources Redemptions of Special Issues ^^^^___r_„_^^^^ Gov't Account Sales 40- 40 Coupon Maturities | I Coupon Refundings Foreign Nonmarketables: 30 Nonmarketables 30 Savings Bonds | Done 20- 1/4 20 State & Local Net Market Borrowing To Be Done I Cash Deficit 10 10 Decrease in Cash Balance t 0 ^Assumes $8 Billion March 31, 1980 Cash Balance. Office of the Secretary of the Treasury Office of Government Financing January 29, 1980-12 TREASURY OPERATING CASH BALANCE Semi-Monthly $Bil. Without — New Borrowing 4 Total Operating 20 ^ Balance 15 Tax and Loan a Accounts Balance w< 10 t>w'<''i>HWB/ Federal Reserve Account 0 -5 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. 1979 1980 Office of the Secretary of the Treasury Office of Government Financing January 29, 1980-13 TREASURY NET MARKET BORROWING^ Calendar Year Quarters $Bil. $Bil. COUPONS 24.7 MlOver 10 yrs. 23.9 ^0-10 yrs. BILLS 20 20 10 10 0 -10 -3.9 -10 I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1/ Excludes Federal Reserve and Government Account Transactions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Winter Season December 1, 1980 -- February 28, 1981
    CONTINENT,\IJ SURVEY The Winter Season December 1, 1980 -- February 28, 1981 Abbreviations frequently used in Regional Reports ad.: adult, Am.: American, c.: central, C: Celsius, CBC: Refuge, Res.: Reservoir, not Reservation, R.: River, S.P.: Christmas Bird Count, Cr.: Creek, Corn. Common, Co.: State Park, sp.: species,spp.: speciesplural, ssp.: subspecies, County, Cos.: Counties, et aL: and others, E.: Eastern (bird lwp.: Township, W.: Western (bird name), W.M.A.: Wildlife name),Eur.: European, Eurasian, F: Fahrenheit,fide:rcport- Management Area, v.o.: various observers, N,S,W,E,: direc- ed by, F.&W.S.: Fish & Wildlife Servicc,Ft.: Fort, imm.: im- tion of motion, n., s., w., e.: direction of location, >: more mature, 1.: Island, Is.: Islands, Isles, Jet.: Junction, juv.: than, <: fewer than, _+: approximately, or estimated number, juvenile, L.: Lake, m.ob.: many observers, Mr.: Mountain, cr: male, 9: female, •: imm. or female, *: specimen, ph.: Mrs.: Mountains, N.F.: National Forest, N.M.: National photographed, ]': documented, ft: feet, mi: miles, m: meters, Monument, N.P.: National Park, N.W.R.: Nat'l Wildlife kin: kilometers, date with a + (e.g., Mar. 4+): recorded Refuge, N.: Northern (bird name), Par.: Parish, Pen.: Penin- beyond that date. Editors may also abbreviate often-cited sula, P.P.: Provincial Park, Pt.: Point, not Port, Ref.: locations or organizations. NORTHEASTERN MARITIME noses were scarce or were not adequatelyre- REGION ported; 15 N. Fulmar / Peter D. Vickery were seen off Rockport, Mass., Feb. 7 (fide RPE). Two imm. Great Cormorants were unus- This winter was one of the quietest in re- ual inland along the Ag- cent years.
    [Show full text]