William Hayden English Family Papers, 1741–1928

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

William Hayden English Family Papers, 1741–1928 Collection # M 0098 OMB 0002 BV 1137–1148, 2571–2572, 2574 F 0595p WILLIAM HAYDEN ENGLISH FAMILY PAPERS, 1741–1928 Collection Information 1 Biographical Sketches 2 Scope and Content Note 9 Series Contents 13 Processed by Reprocessed by Betty Alberty, Ruth Leukhardt, Paul Brockman, and Pamela Tranfield 08 January 2003 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF 103 boxes, 3 oversize boxes, 15 bound volumes, 1 microfilm COLLECTION: reel, 76 boxes of photographs (16 document cases, 12 oversize boxes, 17 boxes cased images, 2 boxes lantern slides, 27 boxes glass negatives, 2 boxes film negatives), 6 boxes of graphics (1 document case, 5 oversize boxes). COLLECTION 1741–1928 DATES: PROVENANCE: Mrs. William E. English Estate, May 1942; Indiana University, July 1944; Forest H. Sweet, Battle Creek, Michigan, August 1937, July 1945, Dec. 1953; University of Chicago Libraries, April 1957; English Foundation, Indianapolis IN, 1958; Mrs. A. G. Parker, Lexington, IN, Sept. 1969; King V. Hostick, Springfield IL, March 1970; Duanne Elbert, Eastern Illinois University, Oct. 1974; Hyman Roth, Evanston IL, Aug. 1975 RESTRICTIONS: Negatives may be viewed by appointment only. Inquire at the Reference Desk. COPYRIGHT: REPRODUCTION Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection RIGHTS: must be obtained from the Indiana Historical Society. ALTERNATE FORMATS: RELATED English Theatre Records (M 0451) HOLDINGS: ACCESSION 1937.0803; 1942.0512; 1944.0710; 1945.0707; 1953.1226; NUMBERS: 1957.0434; 1958.0015; 1969.0904; 1970.0317; 1974.1018; 1975.0810 NOTES: Originally processed by Charles Latham, 1983 Indiana Historical Society William Hayden English Family Papers Page 1 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES William Hayden English, 1822–96 William H. English was born in Lexington, Scott County, Indiana, on 27 August 1822. He was the son of Elisha G. and Mahala Eastin English. His paternal grandfather Elisha English had moved from Delaware to Kentucky in 1790, and his father moved to Lexington in 1818. On his mother’s side he was descended from Jost Hite, one of the earliest settlers of the Shenandoah Valley in Virginia. Through Hite he was related indirectly both to George Rogers Clark and to Isaac and Joseph Bowman, two of Clark’s chief lieutenants in his campaign of 1777-1778. William H. English was educated locally and spent three years at Hanover College. He studied law and was admitted to the bar at the early age of 18, in 1840. In the same year he began his career in politics, serving as a delegate to the Democratic state convention in Indianapolis. He soon reaped his first political award, with an appointment as postmaster at Lexington from President Tyler in 1842, when Tyler broke with the Whigs who had elected him. In 1843 English was appointed clerk of the Indiana House of Representatives. With the election of James K. Polk as president in 1844, English began a well-organized campaign for a government post. He obtained recommendations from most prominent Democrats in the state, especially Jesse D. Bright, who at this time began his three terms as senator. This began a long correspondence with Bright, dealing both with political matters and with requests by Bright for loans to himself and his friends. As a result of his campaign English achieved his modest request—a clerkship in the Treasury Department. He held this post till the end of Polk’s term in March 1849. In 1847, while serving in Washington, English married Emma Mardulia Jackson. The English family continued to be active in Democratic politics. At the 1848 Democratic Convention, Elisha English and his brother Revel were vice-presidents, and two other brothers were delegates. In 1850 William H. English served as clerk of the Senate committee on claims. As early as 1847 English was making considerable business investments. These included government bonds and a land purchase in Wisconsin. In 1849 he embarked on a rather complicated real estate deal in San Francisco. This ended in a suit among English and his partners and caused a dispute which lasted over thirty years. The year 1850 saw English debut with electoral politics. In 1850–51 he was principal secretary of the Indiana Constitutional Convention which revised the original 1816 constitution. In 1851–52 he served in the Indiana House of Representatives; in 1852 he became speaker, the youngest man ever to be elected to that office. This was a particularly productive session of the legislature, which passed many acts revising the state laws in accordance with the new state constitution. Indiana Historical Society William Hayden English Family Papers Page 2 In 1852 English was elected for the first of four terms in the national House of Representatives, representing Indiana’s second district. In his first term he served on the committee on territories, and was therefore involved in the writing of the Kansas-Nebraska Act which became law in 1854. In committee English proposed an amendment embodying the principle of popular sovereignty which became the main feature of the act. In the election of 1854 English was one of three northern Democrats who voted for Kansas-Nebraska to be re-elected. In the campaign he took a strong stand against the Know-Nothing party which was particularly violent in Kentucky and Southern Indiana. Again re-elected in 1856, he served during the 35th Congress as chairman of the committee on post-office and post roads. Toward the end of this Congress, English became involved with the question of ‘bloody Kansas.’ After the principle of popular sovereignty was applied to the Kansas territory by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, the pro-and-anti- slavery faction had been doing their utmost to fill Kansas with their adherents. In late 1857 a pro-slavery convention at Lecompton (anti-slavery men refused to vote) formed a pro-slavery constitution for Kansas; however in an election in January this Lecompton constitution was rejected at the polls (pro-slavery people having refused to vote.) The national Democratic administration was anxious for Kansas to come in as a slave state. The U. S. Senate passed a bill admitting Kansas under the Lecompton Constitution; the House rejected this bill; the Senate asked for a conference committee; and English was one of three representatives appointed to this committee, which was headed by Alexander H. Stephens. English had originally been opposed to the admission of Kansas under the Lecompton constitution, on grounds that the people of Kansas had not had a fair chance to express their views. The conference committee came forward with a bill usually known as the English bill (though Stephens in his account of the committee’s work did not mention English). This bill in effect called for a re-vote on the Lecompton constitution, and provided that, if the constitution were approved, Kansas would be given a grant of 5 million acres of government lands. The English Bill passed both houses of Congress by narrow majorities, but Kansas voters turned down the Lecompton constitution in an election held in August 1858. Whether English’s aims were for popular sovereignty, or for legislative compromise, or for a pro-slavery Kansas, is a matter of argument. For his work in this matter, English was offered a high government post by President Buchanan, but turned it down. Somewhat against his wishes, English was re-elected to a fourth term in Congress, in 1858. As things grew more bitter between North and South, he stood with Douglas against secession. Though not a delegate, he worked at the split-away Democrat convention at Charleston to argue against splitting the party. In 1854, when the Smithsonian Institution was established, he was appointed to the Board of Regents as a representative of the House, and served for six years. This ended a twenty-year period during most of which English was involved in one way or another with the Indiana or national legislature. During this period English displayed Indiana Historical Society William Hayden English Family Papers Page 3 ability, efficiency, and legislative promise, but rarely was clarified with a positive idea or principle, with the possible exception of popular sovereignty in the territories, which was itself a political compromise. At the beginning of the Civil War, English was offered a military commission by Indiana Governor Oliver P. Morton, but refused it. He spent the next seventeen years in a new career, in banking. Previous to this he had had some contact with James F.D. Lanier of Madison, whose career had also moved from politics to banking. First, English began negotiations, never completed, for control of the Jeffersonville branch of the Third State Bank. Then, in 1863, with the announcement by Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase of the National banking system, he was involved, along with Lanier and John C. New, in chartering the First National Bank in Indianapolis, with a capital of $150,000. English was immediately elected president of the bank, and served until 1877. In 1865 he moved to a handsome mansion on the Governor’s Circle in Indianapolis, He became involved in extensive real estate ownership. One controversial part of his bank presidency is the degree to which he took advantage of economic conditions in the poor times of 1873-1876 to obtain more property by foreclosures. He also regained a controlling interest in the Indianapolis Street Railways Co., and served as its treasurer. Shortly before the death of his wife in 1877, English resigned his bank presidency, and sold his stock in the street railways. He was soon launched on a second career in politics. In 1876 he was a main speaker at the Indianapolis meeting ratifying the nomination of Tilden and Hendricks.
Recommended publications
  • Indiana Magazine of History
    INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY VOLUMEXXV DECEMBER, 1929 NUMBER4 The Burr Conspiracy In Indiana* By ISAACJ. Cox Indiana in the days of the Burr Conspiracy embraced a much larger area than today-at least technically. It extend- ed westward from the boundary of the recently-created state of Ohio to the Mississippi. The white settlements within this area were, it is true, few and scattering. The occasional clearings within the forests were almost wholly occupied by Indians slowly receding before the advance of a civilization that was too powerful for them. But sparse as was the popu- lation of the frontier territory when first created, its infini- tesimal average per square mile had been greatly lowered in 1804, for Congress had bestowed upon its governor the ad- ministration of that part of Louisiana that lay above the thirty-third parallel. As thus constituted, it was a region of boundless aspira- tions-a fitting stage for two distinguished travelers who journeyed through it the following year. Within its extended confines near the mouth of the Ohio lay Fort Massac, where in June, '1805, Burr held his mysterious interview with Wilkinson,' and also the cluster of French settlements from which William Morrison, the year before, had attempted to open trading relations with Santa Fe2-a project in which Wilkinson was to follow him. It was here that Willrinson, the second of this sinister pair, received from his predecessor a letter warning him against political factions in his new juris- diction.a By this act Governor Harrison emphasized not only his own personal experiences, but also the essential connection of the area with Hoosierdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda Mccollough Research Library, Tippecanoe County
    Early Tippecanoe County Obituaries and Death Notices 1830 -1904 Alameda McCollough Research Library, Tippecanoe County Historical Association 1830-1904 Early Obituary Index This obituary index is from early newspapers in our collection. Some are just death notices, but others have more. Spelling is a continuous issue in early times. Note; brackets are added information from other sources. Names are repeated because they were listed in more than one newspaper. Email for cost at [email protected] First Name M Last Name year age spouse/ maiden/misc Lily Oatsfield 1878 at Home for the Friendless Bruce Obenchain 1900 52 at Hannibal, MO; machinist John Obenchain 1903 74 of Washington Twp.; built mills and boats Sallie Obenchine 1865 68 Sallie Obenshain 1865 67 w/o John; 1st husband Maj. William A. Johnson Clementine Ober 1899 86 m/o Henry L. Bailey; died in Evansville Philip Ober 1904 37 leaves widow & 2 brothers Mrs. [R. Elizabeth] Oberle 1891 38 w/o Stephen; 6 children Dennis O'Brian 1875 Railroad engineer James O'Brian 1859 James H O'Brian 1859 ex-mayor; hunting accident in Starke Co. William O'Brien 1876 Bridget O'Brien 1904 wid/o Robert; 4 children survive Bridget O'Brien 1904 Carrie O'Brien 1880 d/o late James O'Brien, first mayor Charles O'Brien 1888 18 child of James of Round Grove; typhoid Daniel O'Brien 1888 38 born in Ireland Edward O'Brien 1893 fireman on Monon RR; killed in wreck at Rossville Edward O'Brien 1893 trainwreck Frank O'Brien 1891 22 died in county jail; little known of him Infant [James] O'Brien 1891 18m child of John James O'Brien 1896 John O'Brien 1878 lived near Battle Ground John O'Brien 1904 removed from Battle Ground to St.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1823, TO MARCH 3, 1825 FIRST SESSION—December 1, 1823, to May 27, 1824 SECOND SESSION—December 6, 1824, to March 3, 1825 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—DANIEL D. TOMPKINS, of New York PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—JOHN GAILLARD, 1 of South Carolina SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—CHARLES CUTTS, of New Hampshire SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—MOUNTJOY BAYLY, of Maryland SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—HENRY CLAY, 2 of Kentucky CLERK OF THE HOUSE—MATTHEW ST. CLAIR CLARKE, 3 of Pennsylvania SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—THOMAS DUNN, of Maryland; JOHN O. DUNN, 4 of District of Columbia DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—BENJAMIN BIRCH, of Maryland ALABAMA GEORGIA Waller Taylor, Vincennes SENATORS SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES William R. King, Cahaba John Elliott, Sunbury Jonathan Jennings, Charlestown William Kelly, Huntsville Nicholas Ware, 8 Richmond John Test, Brookville REPRESENTATIVES Thomas W. Cobb, 9 Greensboro William Prince, 14 Princeton John McKee, Tuscaloosa REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Gabriel Moore, Huntsville Jacob Call, 15 Princeton George W. Owen, Claiborne Joel Abbot, Washington George Cary, Appling CONNECTICUT Thomas W. Cobb, 10 Greensboro KENTUCKY 11 SENATORS Richard H. Wilde, Augusta SENATORS James Lanman, Norwich Alfred Cuthbert, Eatonton Elijah Boardman, 5 Litchfield John Forsyth, Augusta Richard M. Johnson, Great Crossings Henry W. Edwards, 6 New Haven Edward F. Tattnall, Savannah Isham Talbot, Frankfort REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Wiley Thompson, Elberton REPRESENTATIVES Noyes Barber, Groton Samuel A. Foote, Cheshire ILLINOIS Richard A. Buckner, Greensburg Ansel Sterling, Sharon SENATORS Henry Clay, Lexington Ebenezer Stoddard, Woodstock Jesse B. Thomas, Edwardsville Robert P. Henry, Hopkinsville Gideon Tomlinson, Fairfield Ninian Edwards, 12 Edwardsville Francis Johnson, Bowling Green Lemuel Whitman, Farmington John McLean, 13 Shawneetown John T.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The Missouri compromise revisited Robinson, David Paul How to cite: Robinson, David Paul (1990) The Missouri compromise revisited, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/6255/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk ABSTRACT - THE MISSOURI COMPROMISE REVISITED David Paul Robinson. Submitted for the degree of M.A., 1990. Department of History, University of Durham. This study concentrates on the period from the introduction of the Tallmadge amendment in February 1819 to the settiing of the controversy with the famous Compromise in March 1820. The Missouri crisis is erroneously viewed as the product of politics first, with antislavery a poor second. There are examples of growing sectional antagonism before 1819. But at no time was consistent sectional unity possible on economic and political issues. Only slavery produced the unity and strength of feeling to provoke a major sectional conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Magazine of History
    INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY VOL. XX’VI SEPTEMBER, 1930 NUMBER3 Amos Lane, Advocate of Western Democracy By WENDELLHOLMES STEPHENSON THE CALL OF THE WEST In the quarter-century following the War of 1812, Amos Lane was a familiar figure in southeastern Indiana as he traveled the ill-kept roads and bridle-paths of the third judicial circuit, astride his sixty-dollar horse, “Big Sorrel.” The fash- ionable eel-skin queue and “wilted rorum hat” identified him as an itinerant attorney. Eager for political advancement, he mingled in the court yard with tillers of the soil and hewers of wood and won a seat in the lower branch of the first state legis- lature, which elevated him to the speakership at its second ses- sion. A weathervane in politics, he renounced the nationalism of Adams and Clay for the more popular democracy of Andrew Jackson. Although he boasted “That he wore no collar-no man’s yoke,” so ardently did he defend his hero in congress that he earned the sobriquet of “Wheel Horse.” He surpassed his idol in one respect at least ; he could swear mightier oaths than even the proficient Jackson. A contemporary asserted that when he mounted the stump and hurled sarcasm and in- vective at his political opponents, he was “heard to grit and grind his teeth together fifty yards.”l Indeed his long and loud ebullient tirades annoyed his enemies, and they dubbed him “the Ajax Telamon of the Party.” Like his Greek proto- type, he was always ready to defend his personal honor, al- though it is not of record that he ever served in th.e army.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the U.S. Attorneys
    Bicentennial Celebration of the United States Attorneys 1789 - 1989 "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor– indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one." QUOTED FROM STATEMENT OF MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND, BERGER V. UNITED STATES, 295 U. S. 88 (1935) Note: The information in this document was compiled from historical records maintained by the Offices of the United States Attorneys and by the Department of Justice. Every effort has been made to prepare accurate information. In some instances, this document mentions officials without the “United States Attorney” title, who nevertheless served under federal appointment to enforce the laws of the United States in federal territories prior to statehood and the creation of a federal judicial district. INTRODUCTION In this, the Bicentennial Year of the United States Constitution, the people of America find cause to celebrate the principles formulated at the inception of the nation Alexis de Tocqueville called, “The Great Experiment.” The experiment has worked, and the survival of the Constitution is proof of that.
    [Show full text]
  • Varney-Porter Family Papers, 1756-1939 (Bulk 1808-1922)
    Collection # M 0639 OM 0297 VARNEY-PORTER FAMILY PAPERS, 1756-1939 (BULK 1808-1922) Collection Information 1 Historical Background 2 Scope and Content Note 3 Contents 4 Processed by: Paul Brockman 7 October 1993 Updated 11 May 2004 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF 9 manuscript boxes, 2 oversize manuscript folders, 2 photograph COLLECTION: boxes, 3 OVA photograph folders COLLECTION Inclusive 1756-1939; Bulk, 1808-1922 DATES: PROVENANCE: Barbara A. Walters for the estate of Constance Varney Cannon Van Devanter, Burnsville, North Carolina, 26 August 1991 RESTRICTIONS: None REPRODUCTION Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection must RIGHTS: be obtained from the Indiana Historical Society. ALTERNATE None FORMATS: RELATED Albert Gallatin Porter Collection (M 0396) HOLDINGS: ACCESSION 1991.0692 NUMBER: NOTES: Indiana Historical Society Varney-Porter Page 1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND This collection primarily consists of the papers and photographs of several individuals connected with the Varney and Porter families: Thomas Randolph (1771-1811) was born in Richmond, Virginia, attended William & Mary College, studied law, and came to the Indiana Territory in 1807. Shortly after his arrival, Randolph was appointed Attorney General for the territory by Governor William Henry Harrison. In 1810 he married Catherine Lawrence, a stepdaughter of General James Dill. Randolph was the Virginia, or pro-slavery, party's choice for Congress in 1809, but he was defeated by Jonathan Jennings in the election for Territorial Representative by thirty-nine votes. Randolph contested the election, but his appeal was denied by the election committee.
    [Show full text]
  • And Others Indiana Studies: Hoosier History, Government, and Peop
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 293 774 SO 019 062 AUTHOR Barger, Harry D.; And Others TITLE Indiana Studies: Hoosier History, Government,and People. Teacher's Guide. INSTITUTION Indiana Council for Social Studies. SPONS AGENCY Lilly Endowment, Inc., Indianapolis, Ind. PUB DATE 85 NOTE 71p.; For instructional units 1-6,see SO 019 056-061. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Guides (For Teachers) (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Citizenship Education; *Information Sources;Resource Materials; Secondary Education; Social Studies; *State Government; *State History; Teaching Methods IDENTIFIERS *Indiana ABSTRACT This teacher's guide accompanies the IndianaStudies: Hoosier History, Government, and People series,units 1-6, designed to be taught in Indiana secondary schools. The guidesummarizes the main points that the teacher should emphasize ineach chapter of each unit, and suggests resource materialto accompany the chapter. Suggested teaching proceduresare outlined for each chapter. Topics within each chapter that might allowstudent research projects are indicated and the use ofany special materials included in units such as maps or charts is emphasized. Each unit concludes witha unit test, and a list of sources. Topics for extra-creditassignments, and answers to chapter activities are provided where relevant. (SM) **************************,.******************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRSare the best that can be made * * from the original document. * *********************************************************************** TEACHER'S GUIDEFOR INDIANA STUDIES: HOOSIER HISTORY,GOVERNMENT, AND PEOPLE AUTHORS Harry D. Barger Forest Park ElementarySchool, Fort Wayne Lida Barker Roosevelt High School,Gary Don R. Evans Northside Junior High School,Fort Wayne Patricia A. Gunkel formerly of Brown CountyHigh School, Nashville and currently at Frisco,Colorado Joseph T. Krause West Lafayette High School,West Lafayette .
    [Show full text]
  • Equality of Man Before His Creator”: Thaddeus Stevens’S Struggle for Radical Reconstruction on December 4, 1865
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HUMANITIES “EQUALITY OF MAN BEFORE HIS CREATOR”: THADDEUS STEVENS’S STRUGGLE FOR RADICAL RECONSTRUCTION ON DECEMBER 4, 1865 CURTIS ROYER SPRING 2017 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in American Studies with honors in American Studies Reviewed and approved* by the following: John Haddad Professor of American Studies Thesis Supervisor Anne A. Verplanck Associate Professor of American Studies Faculty Reader Ronald A. Walker Associate Professor of Mathematics Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College i ABSTRACT December 4, 1865 remains one of the least remembered dates in American history. Yet, the implications of the events of that day affect us even today. United States Representative Thaddeus Stevens of Pennsylvania (1792-1868) worked with fellow Republicans in the House of Representatives to bar Southern representative-elects from taking their seats in Congress on December 4, 1865. This thesis explores December 4 as a pivotal date to both the United States and the career of Stevens. If the Southern representative-elects, some of whom were former Confederate officials, were permitted to take their seats in Congress they may have worked with Northern Democrats to reverse the progress made by Republicans during the Civil War by permanently manipulating the Thirteenth Amendment to reinstate a form of slavery. Southern legislatures had already begun the process of recreating a slave-like system with the black codes. Stevens found these codes to be highly disturbing. Instead, Stevens consulted the Constitution and effectively barred the Southern delegation from Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • "'L · Rf.\I Lf( ~ L
    'Wi{{/(jruntfy (jenea{ogica{ Society honors a pioneer, I 'Wi{{iam 'I. !/{e{son, who lived in Will County in 1 848. William T. Nelson was the second of nine known children born to John and Elizabeth (Gray) Nelson. His father, born about the year 1786, was of Scots-Irish descent and was raised in Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania, 'later living in Kentucky, Ohio and Indiana before moving to Twelve Mile Grove, Will Co., Illinois in 1848. He had served in the War of 1 81 2 and also represented his county in the Indiana legislature while residing there. Born on the 9th day of January 181 8 in Ohio, William came to Will County with his parents, along with four of his brothers and sisters - Esther Jane, Samuel G., ·Mary and Daniel Mc. He was married in the early 1850's to Celia Annette Derke/Durkee, born 5 February 1825 in Indiana. Five children were born to the couple - Mary Freelove, Sarah Annette, Kate G., William and Thomas M. Mr. Nelson was a nurseryman, owner of the Wilmington Nursery. He is thought to have produced the "Nelson apple," which was highly regarded prior to the advent of refrigeration. Along with his brothers Samuel and Daniel, he was active in civic affairs. He served as secretary of the Will Co. Fair and was a charter member of Wilmington Masonic Lodge #208. The death of William T. Nelson occurred on the 11th of December 1903 in Chicago, where he had made his home with his daughter Sarah, Mrs. Daniel "Mac" White, after the death of his wife in 1 888.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School Fall 11-12-1992 Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Earman, Cynthia Diane, "Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830" (1992). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8222. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8222 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOARDINGHOUSES, PARTIES AND THE CREATION OF A POLITICAL SOCIETY: WASHINGTON CITY, 1800-1830 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Cynthia Diane Earman A.B., Goucher College, 1989 December 1992 MANUSCRIPT THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the Master's and Doctor's Degrees and deposited in the Louisiana State University Libraries are available for inspection. Use of any thesis is limited by the rights of the author. Bibliographical references may be noted, but passages may not be copied unless the author has given permission. Credit must be given in subsequent written or published work. A library which borrows this thesis for use by its clientele is expected to make sure that the borrower is aware of the above restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana GAR Posts & History
    Grand Army of the Republic Posts - Historical Summary National GAR Records Program - Historical Summary of Grand Army of the Republic (GAR) Posts by State INDIANA Prepared by the National Organization SONS OF UNION VETERANS OF THE CIVIL WAR INCORPORATED BY ACT OF CONGRESS No. Alt. Post Name Location County Dept. Post Namesake Meeting Place(s) Organized Last Mentioned Notes Source(s) No. PLEASE NOTE: The GAR Post History section is a work in progress (begun 2013). More data will be added at a future date. Reviewed to 1884-1889, 1891-1901. 000 (Department) N/A N/A IN Org. 20 Aug. Ended 1949 Department of Indiana organized 20 August 1866. Although it Beath, 1889; Carnahan, 1893; 1866; Re-org. 3 numbered as many as 300 Posts, it made no reports and paid no National Encampment Oct. 1879 dues to National HQ, causing it to soon dissolve. An attempt to Proceedings, 1949; Dept. reorganize a Provisional Department was made in 1871, but failed. Proceedings, 1901 A new Provisional Department was organized 11 August 1879, becoming a Permanent Department on 3 October 1879. The Department came to an end with the death of its last member in 1949. ? Corydon Harrison IL Chart'd 23 May Described only as the "Post of Corydon" in the Harrison District of Nat'l Encampment 1866 the GAR. Proceedings, 1892 001 Post No. 1 Porter IL No namesake. Known only by its Org. 13 Dec. Dis. about 1869 Thirty-three charter members. Disbanded three years after being Vidette-Messenger, 18 Aug. number. 1866 chartered. 1936 001 051 Oliver P.
    [Show full text]