DOCSLIB.ORG

Fr0104396 Long-Term Behavior of Radiotoxicity and Decay Heat Power of Spent Uranium-Plutonium and Thorium Fuel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fr0104396 Long-Term Behavior of Radiotoxicity and Decay Heat Power of Spent Uranium-Plutonium and Thorium Fuel FR0104396 LONG-TERM BEHAVIOR OF RADIOTOXICITY AND DECAY HEAT POWER OF SPENT URANIUM-PLUTONIUM AND THORIUM FUEL A.S.Gerasimov, B.R.Bergelson, T.S.Zaritskaya, G.V.Kiselev, L.A.Myrtsymova, G.V.Tikhomirov State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (SSC RF ITEP), 25, B.Cheremushkinskaya, Moscow, 117259, Russia [email protected] Changes of a radiotoxicity and decay heat power of actinides from spent U-Pu and Th-U nuclear fuel of PWR-type reactors at long-term storage during 300 years are investigated. Extraction of most important nuclides for transmutation permits to reduce radiological danger of wastes remaining in storage. INTRODUCTION The problem of a radiotoxicity of long-lived radioactive wastes produced in various nuclear fuel cycles is important from the viewpoint of ecological danger of these cycles. Separation of the most important nuclides and extraction them from storage with subsequent transmutation permits to reduce radiological danger of wastes staying in storage. Removal of nuclides with increased decay heat power from storage permits to ease requirements to heat removal systems at long-term storage of wastes. Quantitative comparison of the radiological characteristics of minor actinides produced in various fuel cycles is also of interest. Changes of radiotoxicity and decay heat power of actinides from spent uranium - plutonium and thorium nuclear fuel of VVER-1000 type reactors at storage during 300 years are investigated in the paper. In previous investigations (1, 2), calculation of radiotoxicity and decay heat power of spent uranium fuel were submitted at long-term storage or accumulation in storehouse. Radiation characteristics of fission products from spent uranium-plutonium or thorium fuel are close to those from uranium fuel which are studied in (1, 2). The radiotoxicity RT, of nuclide i by water is determined by ratio RT,- = A,- / MPA,-, where A/ - activity of considered amount of a nuclide i, MPA,- - maximum permissible activity of this nuclide by water accepted in Russia in 1999 (3). Total radiotoxicity is a sum of radiotoxicities. SPENT URANIUM-PLUTONIUM FUEL Total radiotoxicity of actinides by water and contributions of most important actinides in total radiotoxicity at storage of spent uranium-plutonium MOX-fuel are presented in table 1. Total decay heat power and contributions of most important actinides are given in table 2. T is storage time. The data on half-life times and power in decays are taken from (4). The fresh fuel was a mix of depleted uranium with addition of 3.5 % plutonium-239. The data on contents of actinides in spent uranium - plutonium fuel are obtained by model calculations of fuel burnup in neutron spectrum created by uranium fuel in an active core of VVER type reactor (5). They correspond to burnup of 44 kg of fission products per 1 ton and subsequent cooling during 3 years. Isotopes of neptunium, plutonium, americium, and curium without uranium isotopes were taken into account. The radiotoxicity of actinides by water in initial period of storage is determined by nuclides Pu-238, Pu-240, Pu-241, Am-241, Cm-244. The contribution of Cm-244 in initial period makes 25%, plutonium isotopes - 55%, Am-241 - 10-15%. After 100 years of a storage, total radiotoxicity of actinides decreases 1.4 times. The main contribution 70 % gives Am-241, plutonium isotopes - P5-07 28%, Cm-244 - 0.8% of total radiotoxicity to the end of 100-year storage. The radiotoxicity of actinides of uranium-plutonium fuel appears about 3 times more than for uranium fuel. Table 1. Radiotoxicity of actinides from 1 ton of spent uranium-plutonium fuel, 10 14 kg water T, years Nuclide 1 3 10 30 100 300 Pu-238 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.6 0.91 0.19 Pu-239 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.42 Pu-240 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 Pu-241 4.2 3.8 2.7 1.0 3.6-2 6.3-5 Am-241 1.5 2.1 3.6 5.8 6.5 4.8 Am-242m 1.3-2 1.3-2 1.3-2 1.2-2 8.4-3 3.4-3 Am-243 4.5-2 4.5-2 4.5-2 4.5-2 4.5-2 4.4-2 Cm-242 1.3-2 1.2-3 6.4-4 5.8-4 4.2-4 1.7-4 Cm-243 3.5-2 3.4-2 2.8-2 1.7-2 3.2-3 2.5-5 Cm-244 3.5 3.2 2.5 1.2 7.9-2 3.8-5 Total 13 13 12 11 9.2 6.6 Table 2. Decay heat power of actinides from 1 ton of spent uranium-plutonium fuel, Watt T, years Nuclide 1 3 10 30 1000 300 Pu-238 106 105 99.0 84.6 48.9 10.3 Pu-239 20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1 20.0 Pu-240 55.0 55.1 55.3 55.5 55.4 54.3 Pu-241 10.6 9.60 6.85 2.62 9.02-2 1.57-4 Pu-242 0.209 0.209 0.209 0.209 0.209 0.209 Am-241 96.5 130 225 363 407 297 Am-243 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.68 2.63 Cm-242 15.5 1.45 0.763 0.697 0.506 0.203 Cm-243 3.24 3.09 2.60 1.60 0.292 2.25-3 Cm-244 398 369 282 131 9.00 4.26-3 Total 708 696 694 663 544 385 The decay heat power of actinides in beginning of a storage is determined by Cm-244 which gives about 50 % of a power. The plutonium isotopes create 27 %, Am-241 - 15-20 %. After 100 years of a storage, total power of actinides decreases 1.3 times. The main contribution 75 % gives Am-241, plutonium isotopes - 23 %, Cm-244 - 1.6 %. The power of actinides of uranium - plutonium fuel appears about 3 times more than at usual uranium fuel because of greater accumulation of isotopes of plutonium, americium, and curium. SPENT THORIUM-URANIUM FUEL Total radiotoxicity of actinides by water and contributions of most important actinides in total radiotoxicity at storage of spent thorium-uranium fuel are presented in table 3. Total decay heat power and contributions of most important actinides are given in table 4. The data on contents P5-07 of actinides in spent thorium-uranium fuel are calculated for neutron spectrum created by basic uranium fuel of VVER type reactor. They correspond to burnup of basic uranium fuel 44 kg of fission products per 1 ton and subsequent cooling during 3 years. The fresh fuel was a mix of thorium with addition of 3.3 % uranium-233. Isotopes of thorium, uranium, and more heavier were taken into account. Table 3. Radiotoxicity of actinides from 1 ton of spent thorium-uranium fuel, 10 kg water T, years Nuclide 1 3 10 30 100 300 Th-228 8.3-2 0.18 0.25 0.21 0.10 1.2-2 Th-232 6.3-5 6.3-5 6.3-5 6.3-5 6.3-5 6.3-5 U-232 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.92 0.45 6.0-2 U-233 2.7-4 2.7-4 2.7-4 2.7-4 2.7-4 2.7-4 U-234 4.4-3 4.4-3 4.4-3 4.4-3 4.4-3 4.4-3 Pu-238 7.0-2 6.9-2 6.5-2 5.6-2 3.2-2 6.6-3 Pu-239 3.5-5 3.5-5 3.5-5 3.5-5 3.5-5 3.5-5 Pu-240 2.6-5 2.6-5 2.6-5 2.6-5 2.6-5 2.5-5 Pu-241 8.0-5 7.2-5 5.2-5 2.0-5 6.8-7 - Am-241 2.5-5 3.5-5 6.4-5 1.1-4 1.2-4 8.7-5 Total 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.59 8.6-2 Table 4. Decay heat power of actinides from 1 ton of spent thorium-uranium fuel, Watt T, years Nuclide 1 3 10 30 1000 300 Th-228 88.1 190 263 222 110 14.7 Th-232 2.46-3 2.46-3 2.46-3 2.46-3 2.46-3 2.46-3 U-232 44.9 44.0 41.0 33.5 16.6 2.22 U-234 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pu-238 3.76 3.70 3.51 2.99 1.72 0.355 Pu-239 1.67-3 1.67-3 1.67-3 1.67-3 1.67-3 1.66-3 Pu-240 1.24-3 1.23-3 1.23-3 1.23-3 1.22-3 1.20-3 Am-241 1.58-3 2.21-3 3.99-3 6.62-3 7.45-3 5.45-3 Total 138 238 309 259 129 18.3 The radiotoxicity of actinides during whole storage time is determined by U-232 and its daughter nuclides first of which is Th-228. The half-life period of U-232 makes 68.9 years, Th228 - 1.9 years. The subsequent daughter nuclides in decay chain of U-232 after Th-228 are short-lived.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CURRENT STATUS of DECAY HEAT MEASUREMENTS, EVALUATIONS, and NEEDS*
    CURRENT STATUS OF DECAY HEAT MEASUREMENTS, EVALUATIONS, and NEEDS* J. K. Dickens, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831. CONF-860906—9 This report is dedicated to John C. Connor (1923-1986) An able colleague and a cherished friend DE86 011082 A paper to be presented to the National Topical Conference on Reactor Physics and Safety, Saratoga, New York, September 17-19, 1986 ABSTRACT Over a decade ago serious concern over possible consequences of a loss-of-coolan • accident in a commercial light-water reactor prompted support of several experiments designed specifically to measure the latent energy of beta-ray and gamma-ray emanations from fission products for thermal reactors. This latent energy was termed Decay Heat. At about the same time the American Nuclear Society convened a working group to develop a standard for use in computing decay heat in real reactor environs primarily for regulatory requirements. This working group combined the new experimental results and best evaluated data into a standard which was approved by the ANS and by the ANSI. The primary work since then has been (a) on improvements to computational efforts and (b) experimental measurements for fast reactors. In addition, the need for decay-heat data has been extended well beyond the time regime of a loss-of-coolant accident; new concerns involve, for example, away-from-reactor shipments and storage. The efficacy of the ANS standard for these longer time regimes has been a subject of study with generally positive results. However, a specific problem, namely, the consequences of fission-product neutron capture, remains contentious.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements of Fission Cross Sections for the Isotopes Relevant to the Thorium Fuel Cycle
    EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN/INTC 2001-025 INTC/P-145 08 Aug 2001 Measurements of Fission Cross Sections for the Isotopes relevant to the Thorium Fuel Cycle The n_TOF Collaboration ABBONDANNO U.20, ANDRIAMONJE S.10, ANDRZEJEWSKI J.24, ANGELOPOULOS A.12, ASSIMAKOPOULOS P.15, BACRI C-O.8, BADUREK G.1, BAUMANN P.9, BEER H.11, BENLLIURE J.32, BERTHIER B.8, BONDARENKO I.26, BOS A.J.J.36, BUSTREO N.19, CALVINO F.33, CANO-OTT D.28, CAPOTE R.31, CARLSON P.34, CHARPAK G.5, CHAUVIN N.8, CENNINI P.5, CHEPEL V.25, COLONNA N.20, CORTES G.33, CORTINA D.32, CORVI F.23, DAMIANOGLOU D.16, DAVID S.8, DIMOVASILI E.12, DOMINGO C.29, DOROSHENKO A.27, DURAN ESCRIBANO I.32, ELEFTHERIADIS C.16, EMBID M.28, FERRANT L.8, FERRARI A.5, FERREIRA–MARQUES R.25, FRAIS–KOELBL H.3, FURMAN W.26, FURSOV B.27, GARZON J.A.32, GIOMATARIS I.10, GLEDENOV Y.26, GONZALEZ–ROMERO E.28, GOVERDOVSKI A.27, GRAMEGNA F.19, GRIESMAYER E.3, GUNSING F.10, HAIGHT R.37, HEIL M.11, HOLLANDER P.36, IOANNIDES K.G.15, IOANNOU P.12, ISAEV S.27, JERICHA E.1, KADI Y.5, KAEPPELER F.11, KARADIMOS D.17, KARAMANIS D.15, KAYUKOV A.26, KAZAKOV L.27, KELIC A.9, KETLEROV V.27, KITIS G.16, KOEHLER P.E.38., KOPACH Y.26, KOSSIONIDES E.14, KROSHKINA I.27, LACOSTE V.5, LAMBOUDIS C.16, LEEB H.1, LEPRETRE A.10, LOPES M.25, LOZANO M.31, MARRONE S.20, MARTINEZ-VAL J.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 — Fuel Cycles
    MIT_ch04_29-36.qxd 7/16/2003 1:26 PM Page 29 Chapter 4 — Fuel Cycles The description of a possible global growth sce- one over the other will inevitably be a matter of nario for nuclear power with 1000 or so GWe judgment. All too often, advocates of a particu- deployed worldwide must begin with some lar reactor type or fuel cycle are selective in specification of the nuclear fuel cycles that will emphasizing criteria that have led them to pro- be in operation. The nuclear fuel cycle refers to pose a particular candidate. We believe that all activities that occur in the production of detailed and thorough analysis is needed to nuclear energy. properly evaluate the many fuel cycle alterna- tives. It is important to emphasize that producing nuclear energy requires more than a nuclear We do not believe that a new technical configu- reactor steam supply system and the associated ration exists that meets all the criteria we have turbine-generator equipment required to pro- set forth, e.g. there is not a technical ‘silver bul- duce electricity from the heat created by let’ that will satisfy each of the criteria. nuclear fission. The process includes ore min- Accordingly, the choice of the best technical ing, enrichment, fuel fabrication, waste man- path requires a judgment balancing the charac- agement and disposal, and finally decontami- teristics of a particular fuel cycle against how nation and decommissioning of facilities. All well it meets the criteria we have adopted. steps in the process must be specified, because each involves different technical, economic, Our analysis separates fuel cycles into two classes: safety, and environmental consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY of the BIOSPHERE (Prirodnaya Radioaktivnost' Iosfery)
    XA04N2887 INIS-XA-N--259 L.A. Pertsov TRANSLATED FROM RUSSIAN Published for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations L. A. PERTSOV THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY OF THE BIOSPHERE (Prirodnaya Radioaktivnost' iosfery) Atomizdat NMoskva 1964 Translated from Russian Israel Program for Scientific Translations Jerusalem 1967 18 02 AEC-tr- 6714 Published Pursuant to an Agreement with THE U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON, D. C. Copyright (D 1967 Israel Program for scientific Translations Ltd. IPST Cat. No. 1802 Translated and Edited by IPST Staff Printed in Jerusalem by S. Monison Available from the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Va. 22151 VI/ Table of Contents Introduction .1..................... Bibliography ...................................... 5 Chapter 1. GENESIS OF THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY OF THE BIOSPHERE ......................... 6 § Some historical problems...................... 6 § 2. Formation of natural radioactive isotopes of the earth ..... 7 §3. Radioactive isotope creation by cosmic radiation. ....... 11 §4. Distribution of radioactive isotopes in the earth ........ 12 § 5. The spread of radioactive isotopes over the earth's surface. ................................. 16 § 6. The cycle of natural radioactive isotopes in the biosphere. ................................ 18 Bibliography ................ .................. 22 Chapter 2. PHYSICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF NATURAL RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES. ........... 24 § 1. The contribution of individual radioactive isotopes to the total radioactivity of the biosphere. ............... 24 § 2. Properties of radioactive isotopes not belonging to radio- active families . ............ I............ 27 § 3. Properties of radioactive isotopes of the radioactive families. ................................ 38 § 4. Properties of radioactive isotopes of rare-earth elements .
    [Show full text]
  • Doe Nuclear Physics Reactor Theory Handbook
    DOE-HDBK-1019/2-93 JANUARY 1993 DOE FUNDAMENTALS HANDBOOK NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND REACTOR THEORY Volume 2 of 2 U.S. Department of Energy FSC-6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal., Springfield, VA 22161. Order No. DE93012223 DOE-HDBK-1019/1-93 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND REACTOR THEORY ABSTRACT The Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory Handbook was developed to assist nuclear facility operating contractors in providing operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff with the necessary fundamentals training to ensure a basic understanding of nuclear physics and reactor theory. The handbook includes information on atomic and nuclear physics; neutron characteristics; reactor theory and nuclear parameters; and the theory of reactor operation. This information will provide personnel with a foundation for understanding the scientific principles that are associated with various DOE nuclear facility operations and maintenance. Key Words: Training Material, Atomic Physics, The Chart of the Nuclides, Radioactivity, Radioactive Decay, Neutron Interaction, Fission, Reactor Theory, Neutron Characteristics, Neutron Life Cycle, Reactor Kinetics Rev. 0 NP DOE-HDBK-1019/1-93 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND REACTOR THEORY FOREWORD The Department of Energy (DOE) Fundamentals Handbooks consist of ten academic subjects, which include Mathematics; Classical Physics; Thermodynamics, Heat Transfer, and Fluid Flow; Instrumentation and Control; Electrical Science; Material Science; Mechanical Science; Chemistry; Engineering Symbology, Prints, and Drawings; and Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on Radioactive Materials and Their Measurements Elements Are
    A NOTE ON RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS AND THEIR MEASUREMENTS Elements are placed in the periodic table of elements according to atomic number or proton number often referred to as Z. Their atomic weights are also usually indicated and can be fractional if the element in nature contains more than one isotope. Isotopes of an element all have the same atomic number, Z, but have different numbers of neu- trons. Some of these isotopes, even in naturally occurring elements, may be radioactive, and are usually given the atomic weight of the longest known isotope. Radioactive decay occurs when an unstable atom loses energy by emitting particles and gamma radiation or by spontaneously fission- ing. (Spontaneous fission is one of the natural modes of radioactive decay in which fission occurs without the addition of external energy or particles.) The activity of a radioactive sample is simply the rate of radioactive decay, expressed as the number of decays per unit time. Traditionally, the curie (Ci) was used to quantify the decay rate and was defined as the radioactivity measured for one gram of pure radium, or ~3.7 × 1010 decays per second (d/s), but the value changed as measurement techniques improved. To avoid this problem of a “chang- ing” constant, the Curie is now defined as exactly 3.7 × 1010 d/s. The becquerel (Bq), equal to one d/s, is the official SI unit (International System of Units). The roentgen R( ) is commonly used as a unit of radiation exposure to X-ray or gamma radiation, and can be roughly defined as “that quan- tity of X-ray or gamma radiation needed to produce one electrostatic unit of ionic charge in one cm3 of air under standard temperature and pressure (STP) “normal conditions”.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Heat from High-Level Waste on Performance of Deep Geological Repository Components Iaea, Vienna, 1984 Iaea-Tecdoc-319
    IAEA-TECDOC-319 EFFECTS OF HEAT FROM HIGH-LEVEL WASTE ON PERFORMANC DEEF EO P GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY COMPONENTS REPORT OF A TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING ON EFFECTS OF HEAT FROM RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN DEEP GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORIES ORGANIZEE TH Y DB INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY AND HELD IN STOCKHOLM, 28 AUGUST - 2 SEPTEMBER 1983 A TECHNICAL DOCUMENT ISSUEE TH Y DB INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY. VIENNA, 1984 EFFECTS OF HEAT FROM HIGH-LEVEL WASTE ON PERFORMANCE OF DEEP GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY COMPONENTS IAEA, VIENNA, 1984 IAEA-TECDOC-319 Printed by the IAEA in Austria November 1984 PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK The IAEA doe t maintaisno n stock f reportso thin si s series. However, microfiche copies of these reports can be obtained from IN IS Clearinghouse International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse5 P.O.Bo0 x10 A-1400 Vienna, Austria Orders shoul accompaniee db prepaymeny db f Austriao t n Schillings 80.00 in the form of a cheque or in the form of IAEA microfiche service coupons orderee whicb y hdma separatel ClearinghouseS I y N froI e mth . FOREWORD This report discusse effecte th sdeee th f heapso n geologicato l repository systems and its different components. It reviews the experimental dat d theoreticaaan l effectmodele th f f heaso o s t botn o h the behaviou engineeref o r d naturadan l barriers. This document aimt a s supporting another IAEA publicatio relatea n i n d subject, viz. "Deep Underground Disposal of Radioactive Waste - Near Field Effects", Technical Reports Serie n preparation)s(i lattee Th .
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Natural Isotopes of Elements Other Than H, C, O
    12 NATURAL ISOTOPES OF ELEMENTS OTHER THAN H, C, O In this chapter we are dealing with the less common applications of natural isotopes. Our discussions will be restricted to their origin and isotopic abundances and the main characteristics. Only brief indications are given about possible applications. More details are presented in the other volumes of this series. A few isotopes are mentioned only briefly, as they are of little relevance to water studies. Based on their half-life, the isotopes concerned can be subdivided: 1) stable isotopes of some elements (He, Li, B, N, S, Cl), of which the abundance variations point to certain geochemical and hydrogeological processes, and which can be applied as tracers in the hydrological systems, 2) radioactive isotopes with half-lives exceeding the age of the universe (232Th, 235U, 238U), 3) radioactive isotopes with shorter half-lives, mainly daughter nuclides of the previous catagory of isotopes, 4) radioactive isotopes with shorter half-lives that are of cosmogenic origin, i.e. that are being produced in the atmosphere by interactions of cosmic radiation particles with atmospheric molecules (7Be, 10Be, 26Al, 32Si, 36Cl, 36Ar, 39Ar, 81Kr, 85Kr, 129I) (Lal and Peters, 1967). The isotopes can also be distinguished by their chemical characteristics: 1) the isotopes of noble gases (He, Ar, Kr) play an important role, because of their solubility in water and because of their chemically inert and thus conservative character. Table 12.1 gives the solubility values in water (data from Benson and Krause, 1976); the table also contains the atmospheric concentrations (Andrews, 1992: error in his Eq.4, where Ti/(T1) should read (Ti/T)1); 2) another category consists of the isotopes of elements that are only slightly soluble and have very low concentrations in water under moderate conditions (Be, Al).
    [Show full text]
  • Nuscale Design-Specific Review Standard Section 5.4.7, Decay Heat
    U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DESIGN-SPECIFIC REVIEW STANDARD for NuScale SMR DESIGN 5.4.7 DECAY HEAT REMOVAL (DHR) SYSTEM RESPONSIBILITIES Primary - Organization responsible for review of reactor thermal hydraulic systems in SMRs Secondary - None I. AREAS OF REVIEW The NuScale small modular reactor (SMR) makes extensive use of passive systems to meet regulatory requirements. Routine residual heat removal (RHR) for the NuScale SMR is provided by the main condenser and feedwater system which can cool the reactor coolant system (RCS) to cold shutdown conditions. For refueling operations, the containment is flooded using the Containment Flood and Drain System (CFDS) prior to decoupling the reactor module and cooling is achieved by conduction between the reactor vessel and containment walls and the reactor building pool. Containment is the steel vessel surrounding the reactor pressure vessel and is one of the reactor modules located in the reactor building pool. During normal plant operations, heat is removed from the reactor building pool through a closed loop cooling system and ultimately rejected into the atmosphere through a cooling tower or other external heat sink. This function is further described in Standard Review Plan (SRP) 9.2.5, Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS). The Decay Heat Removal System (DHR) system provides secondary-side cooling for non-loss of coolant (LOCA) design basis events when normal secondary side cooling is unavailable to bring the plant to safe shutdown conditions. The DHR function is included as a safety-related passive system for use during transients, and to provide a similar function as the auxiliary feedwater system (AFW) for a typical, large light water pressurized water reactor (PWR) in the event of a loss of main feedwater.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Scavenging and Circulation Ocean Model of Thorium-230 and Protactinium-231 with Improved Particle Dynamics (NEMO–Prothorp 0.1)
    Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3537–3556, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3537-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. A global scavenging and circulation ocean model of thorium-230 and protactinium-231 with improved particle dynamics (NEMO–ProThorP 0.1) Marco van Hulten1,2, Jean-Claude Dutay1, and Matthieu Roy-Barman1 1Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, IPSL, CEA–Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 2Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Correspondence: Marco van Hulten ([email protected]) Received: 1 November 2017 – Discussion started: 8 December 2017 Revised: 16 August 2018 – Accepted: 20 August 2018 – Published: 31 August 2018 Abstract. In this paper we set forth a 3-D ocean model of the can be done based on our model as its source code is readily radioactive trace isotopes 230Th and 231Pa. The interest arises available. from the fact that these isotopes are extensively used for in- vestigating particle transport in the ocean and reconstructing past ocean circulation. The tracers are reversibly scavenged 1 Introduction by biogenic and lithogenic particles. Our simulations of 230Th and 231Pa are based on the Oceanic circulation and the carbon cycle play a major role NEMO–PISCES ocean biogeochemistry general circulation in the regulation of the past and present climate. Heat and model, which includes biogenic particles, namely small and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere tend to equilibrate with the big particulate organic carbon, calcium carbonate and bio- ocean surface and are transported down into the deep ocean genic silica.
    [Show full text]
  • DOE FUNDAMENTALS HANDBOOK NUCLEAR PHYSICS and REACTOR THEORY Volume 1 of 2
    DOE-HDBK-1019/1-93 JANUARY 1993 DOE FUNDAMENTALS HANDBOOK NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND REACTOR THEORY Volume 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Energy FSC-6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information. P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal., Springfield, VA 22161. Order No. DE93012221 DOE-HDBK-1019/1-93 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND REACTOR THEORY ABSTRACT The Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory Handbook was developed to assist nuclear facility operating contractors in providing operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff with the necessary fundamentals training to ensure a basic understanding of nuclear physics and reactor theory. The handbook includes information on atomic and nuclear physics; neutron characteristics; reactor theory and nuclear parameters; and the theory of reactor operation. This information will provide personnel with a foundation for understanding the scientific principles that are associated with various DOE nuclear facility operations and maintenance. Key Words: Training Material, Atomic Physics, The Chart of the Nuclides, Radioactivity, Radioactive Decay, Neutron Interaction, Fission, Reactor Theory, Neutron Characteristics, Neutron Life Cycle, Reactor Kinetics Rev. 0 NP DOE-HDBK-1019/1-93 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND REACTOR THEORY FOREWORD The Department of Energy (DOE) Fundamentals Handbooks consist of ten academic subjects, which include Mathematics; Classical Physics; Thermodynamics, Heat Transfer, and Fluid Flow; Instrumentation and Control; Electrical Science; Material Science; Mechanical Science; Chemistry; Engineering Symbology, Prints, and Drawings; and Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fuel Cycle Implications of Nuclear Process Heat
    energies Article The Fuel Cycle Implications of Nuclear Process Heat Aiden Peakman 1,2,∗ and Robert Gregg 1 1 National Nuclear Laboratory, Chadwick House, Warrington WA3 6AE, UK; [email protected] 2 School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 August 2020; Accepted: 11 November 2020; Published: 20 November 2020 Abstract: International and UK fuel cycle scenario analyses performed to date have focused on nuclear plants producing electricity without considering in detail the other potential drivers for nuclear power, such as industrial process heat. Part of the reason behind the restricted applications of nuclear power is because the assumptions behind the future scenario are not fully captured, for example how big are demands from different sectors? Here we present a means to fully capture the potential opportunities for nuclear power using Sankey diagrams and then, using this information, consider for the first time in the UK the fuel cycle implications of decarbonising industrial heat demand in the year 2050 with nuclear power using the ORION fuel cycle code to study attributes related to spent fuel, uranium demand and decay heat from the spent fuel. We show that even in high industrial energy demand scenarios, the sensitivity of spent fuel masses and decay heat to the types of reactor deployed is relatively small compared to the greater fuel cycle demands from large-scale deployment of nuclear plants for electricity production. However, the sensitivity of spent fuel volumes depends heavily on the extent to which High Temperature Reactor and Light Water Reactor systems operating on a once-through cycle are deployed.
    [Show full text]