DOCSLIB.ORG

(2002/C 160 E/193) WRITTEN QUESTION P-3626/01 by Alexander De Roo (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(2002/C 160 E/193) WRITTEN QUESTION P-3626/01 by Alexander De Roo (Verts/ALE) to the Commission C 160 E/154 Official Journal of the European Communities EN 4.7.2002 (2002/C 160 E/193) WRITTEN QUESTION P-3626/01 by Alexander de Roo (Verts/ALE) to the Commission (8 January 2002) Subject: Decision by the Netherlands Government to abolish the exemption from ecotax for environ- mentally sound hydro-electricity The Netherlands Government has decided to alter the Regulatory Energy Tax, or ecotax, which exists in the Netherlands. As from 1 January 2002, hydro-electricity will no longer be exempt from this tax, according to the Netherlands Government’s plans. In a letter to the Lower House of Parliament, the Government argues as follows: ‘even now … cheaphydro-electricity [is being] exportedto the Netherlands in large quantities. When the Dutch market in environmentally sound electricity opens, imports of hydro-electricity from certain foreign sources are likely to increase substantially. So long as there is still no level playing field for the environmentally sound electricity market in Europe, the Dutch market in such electricity will be distorted due to the substantial imports of hydro-electricity.’ To take one example, the energy company Nuon is currently supplying nearly 60 000 families in the Netherlands with environmentally sound electricity from small hydro-electric power stations in England, Sweden and Norway. At one stroke, the Netherlands Government is now deciding that this should no longer be classified as environmentally sound electricity. At a time when hundreds of thousands of families in the Netherlands wish to switch to environmentally sound electricity, the Netherlands Government is depriving producers of the opportunity to meet this growing demand in the near future. Consequently it will become economically more difficult to market : and continue to market : sustainable energy. The anticipated trend towards less clean biomass will also hamper compliance with the target figure of 22 % sustainable energy consumption in the Netherlands which was supposed to have been attained within the next few years. It looks very much as if the Netherlands Government’s concern is not so much to create a level playing field for environmentally sound electricity in Europe as to protect the billions it receives in revenue from the ecotax. Does the proposed decision by the Netherlands Government no longer to classify hydro-electricity as environmentally sound electricity accord with existing European rules and legislation, particularly those concerning liberalisation of the electricity market in Europe? How compatible is this proposed decision with the Commission’s plan to introduce electricity labelling so that consumers in Europe know what kind of electricity they are buying and can buy? Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission (4 February 2002) With reference to the first part of the question, the Commission would like to assure the Honourable Member that the Dutch government’s decision to end the ecotax exemption granted for electricity gained from hydropower does not seem to be incompatible with the common electricity market rules that prohibit discrimination among producers from different Member States. According to informations available at present, the hydropower ecotax exemption in question apparently ceases to apply for domestic and other Community producers alike. Furthermore, while Directive 2001/77/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity market (1) (the ‘Directive’) includes electricity from hydropower in ‘electricity produced from renewable energy sources’ (commonly known as ‘green electricity’), the Member States have no obligation to support such electricity through any particular legislative measure, e.g. a tax exemption. Article 3 of the Directive only requires that the Member States take ‘appropriate steps to encourage’ green electricity consumption. The Directive provides no guidance as regards the nature of such steps, which are thus left to the Member States’ discretion. Consequently, the Dutch government is also free to support only certain sources of green electricity without committing a breach of Community law. 4.7.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 160 E/155 With reference to the second part of the question, concerning the connection between the contested decision and the Directive’s labelling provisions, the Commission could not discover a direct link between the two matters. Article 5 of the Directive obliges Member States to guarantee by not later than 27 October 2003 the origin of electricity produced from renewable energy sources (within the meaning of the Directive), yet it does not require the application of specific support measures on their behalf. (1) OJ L 283, 27.10.2001. (2002/C 160 E/194) WRITTEN QUESTION P-3628/01 by Mihail Papayannakis (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (8 January 2002) Subject: Regional planning studies for the Cyclades Further to my Question E-1266/01 (1) to the Commission, I should like to draw attention to the fact that the Greek government’s position on the protection of the region of Molos Marmaron on the island of Paros is still unclear and that: : the Greek Ornithological Society has drawn upa study (with funding from the Ministry for the Environment, Regional Planning and Public Works) on the protection of threatened species of birds of prey in Greece, and the region of Molos Marmaron on Paros is designated as one of the regions of special importance for the survival of these birds; : according to Document 48133/2208/15.05.01 of the Directorate-General for the Environment of the Ministry for the Environment, Regional Planning and Public Works, the region of Molos exhibits hydroscopic features and has small dispersed wetlands; : the Greek Ministry of Agriculture’s Directorate for Environmental Protection has drawn upa document confirming that it will be recommending the adoption of the plan and the protection measures proposed by the Greek Ornithological Society. In view of the above, can the Commission say whether Greece has abandoned plans for the construction of a commercial harbour and whether it intends to protect the region in question? If this is not the case, what does the Commission intend to do to protect the region of Molos? (1) OJ C 364 E, 20.12.2001, p. 70. Answer given by Ms Wallström on behalf of the Commission (11 February 2002) As it stated in its answer to the Honourable Member’s written question E-1266/01, the Commission is not systematically consulted about the planning and implementation of medium-size infrastructure projects, especially when they are not part-financed under the Structural Funds or the Cohesion Fund. The Commission is therefore not in a position to say whether or not the Greek authorities are intending to abandon plans for the construction of the said harbour. A complaint concerning the planned construction of a commercial harbour in Molos Bay on the island of Paros was received by the Commission and recorded under Number 2001/4260. Citing several EU directives, the complainants argue that the project in question could seriously harm the environment. On 29 November 2001, a letter was sent to the Greek authorities requesting information on the existence of such a project, and in particular on compliance with the environmental impact study approval procedure and on the measures taken to prevent or limit any negative impact on the environment..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trends in Electricity Prices During the Transition Away from Coal by William B
    May 2021 | Vol. 10 / No. 10 PRICES AND SPENDING Trends in electricity prices during the transition away from coal By William B. McClain The electric power sector of the United States has undergone several major shifts since the deregulation of wholesale electricity markets began in the 1990s. One interesting shift is the transition away from coal-powered plants toward a greater mix of natural gas and renewable sources. This transition has been spurred by three major factors: rising costs of prepared coal for use in power generation, a significant expansion of economical domestic natural gas production coupled with a corresponding decline in prices, and rapid advances in technology for renewable power generation.1 The transition from coal, which included the early retirement of coal plants, has affected major price-determining factors within the electric power sector such as operation and maintenance costs, 1 U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS capital investment, and fuel costs. Through these effects, the decline of coal as the primary fuel source in American electricity production has affected both wholesale and retail electricity prices. Identifying specific price effects from the transition away from coal is challenging; however the producer price indexes (PPIs) for electric power can be used to compare general trends in price development across generator types and regions, and can be used to learn valuable insights into the early effects of fuel switching in the electric power sector from coal to natural gas and renewable sources. The PPI program measures the average change in prices for industries based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
    [Show full text]
  • Best Electricity Market Design Practices
    In My View Best Electricity Market Design Practices William W. Hogan (forthcoming in IEEE Power & Energy) Organized wholesale electricity markets in the United States follow the principles of bid-based, security-constrained, economic dispatch with locational marginal prices. The basic elements build on analyses done when large thermal generators dominated the structure of the electricity market in most countries. Notable exceptions were countries like Brazil that utilized large-scale pondage hydro systems. For such systems, the critical problem centered on managing a multi- year inventory of stored water. But for most developed electricity systems, the dominance of thermal generation implied that the major interactions in unit commitment decisions would be measured in hours to days, and the interactions in operating decisions would occur over minutes to hours. As a result, single period economic dispatch became the dominant model for analyzing the underlying basic principles. The structure of this analysis Figure 1: Spot Market integrated the terminology of economics and engineering. As shown in SHORT-RUN ELECTRICITY MARKET Figure 1: Spot Market, the Energy Price Short-Run (¢/kWh) Marginal increasing short-run Cost Price at marginal cost of generation 7-7:30 p.m. defined the dispatch stack or supply curve. Thermal Demand efficiencies and fuel cost 7-7:30 p.m. Price at were the primary sources 9-9:30 a.m. of short-run generation cost Price at Demand differences. The 2-2:30 a.m. 9-9:30 a.m. introduction of markets Demand 2-2:30 a.m. added the demand Q1 Q2 Qmax perspective, where lower MW prices induced higher loads.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Power Sector Outlook 2021 Rapid Transition Continues to Reshape Country’S Electricity Generation
    Dennis Wamsted, IEEFA Energy Analyst 1 Seth Feaster, IEEFA Data Analyst David Schlissel, IEEFA Director of Resource Planning Analysis March 2021 U.S. Power Sector Outlook 2021 Rapid Transition Continues To Reshape Country’s Electricity Generation Executive Summary The scope and speed of the transition away from fossil fuels, particularly coal, has been building for the past decade. That transition, driven by the increasing adoption of renewable energy and battery storage, is now nearing exponential growth, particularly for solar. The impact in the next two to three years is going to be transformative. In recognition of this growth, IEEFA’s 2021 outlook has been expanded to include separate sections covering wind and solar, battery storage, coal, and gas— interrelated segments of the power generation sector that are marked by vastly different trajectories: • Wind and solar technology improvements and the resulting price declines have made these two generation resources the least-cost option across much of the U.S. IEEFA expects wind and solar capacity installations to continue their rapid rise for the foreseeable future, driven not only by their cost advantage but also by their superior environmental characteristics. • Coal generation capacity has fallen 32% from its peak 10 years ago—and its share of the U.S. electricity market has fallen even faster, to less than 20% in 2020. IEEFA expects the coal industry’s decline to accelerate as the economic competition from renewables and storage intensifies; operational experience with higher levels of wind and solar grows; and public concern about climate change rises. • Gas benefitted in the 2010s from the fracking revolution and the assumption that it offered a bridge to cleaner generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges Facing Combined Heat and Power Today: a State-By-State Assessment
    Challenges Facing Combined Heat and Power Today: A State-by-State Assessment Anna Chittum and Nate Kaufman September 2011 Report Number IE111 © American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy 529 14th Street, N.W., Suite 600, Washington, D.C. 20045 (202) 507-4000 phone, (202) 429-2248 fax, www.aceee.org Challenges Facing Combined Heat and Power Today, © ACEEE CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................... v Glossary ........................................................................................................................................................ vi Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 1 Combined Heat and Power Today ........................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Part I: General Findings ................................................................................................................................ 6 Economics ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits of Demand Response in Electricity Markets and Recommendations for Achieving Them
    BENEFITS OF DEMAND RESPONSE IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACHIEVING THEM A REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS PURSUANT TO SECTION 1252 OF THE ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005 Price of Demand Electricity Supply Supply DemandDR P PDR QDR Q Quantity of Electricity February 2006 . U.S. Department of Energy ii U.S. Department of Energy Benefits of Demand Response and Recommendations The Secretary [of Energy] shall be responsible for… not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, providing Congress with a report that identifies and quantifies the national benefits of demand response and makes a recommendation on achieving specific levels of such benefits by January 1, 2007. --Sec. 1252(d), the Energy Policy Act of 2005, August 8, 2005 U.S. Department of Energy Benefits of Demand Response and Recommendations iii iv U.S. Department of Energy Benefits of Demand Response and Recommendations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sections 1252(e) and (f) of the U.S. Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT)1 state that it is the policy of the United States to encourage “time-based pricing and other forms of demand response” and encourage States to coordinate, on a regional basis, State energy policies to provide reliable and affordable demand response services to the public. The law also requires the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to provide a report to Congress, not later than 180 days after its enactment, which “identifies and quantifies the national benefits of demand response and makes a recommendation on achieving specific levels of such benefits by January 1, 2007” (EPACT, Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernizing the U.S. Electrical Grid
    Transmission Innovation Symposium Modernizing the U.S. Electrical Grid Chen-Ching Liu Electricity Transmission Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State System Research University and Development: Emma M. Stewart Distribution Integrated Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory with Transmission Operations Prepared for the Transmission Reliability and Renewable Integration Program Advanced Grid R&D, Office of Electricity US Department of Energy April 2021 Electricity Transmission System Research and Development: Distribution Integrated with Transmission Operations Transmission Innovation Symposium: Modernizing the U.S. Electric Grid 2021 White Papers Prepared for the Office of Electricity U.S. Department of Energy Principal Authors Chen-Ching Liu Power and Energy Center Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Emma M. Stewart Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory April 2021 The work described in this study has been authored by authors at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, under a subcontract from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344 with the U.S. Department of Energy. Disclaimer This work was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Assessment of Cogeneration Systems in Operation
    energies Article Economic Assessment of Cogeneration Systems in Operation Aikaterini Papadimitriou 1,2,*, Vassilios Vassiliou 2, Kalliopi Tataraki 1, Eugenia Giannini 1 and Zacharias Maroulis 1 1 Laboratory of Process Analysis and Design, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece; [email protected] (K.T.); [email protected] (E.G.); [email protected] (Z.M.) 2 Attiki Natural Gas Distribution Company SA, 14123 Likovrisi, Greece; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30-6972322509 Received: 29 March 2020; Accepted: 29 April 2020; Published: 2 May 2020 Abstract: A systematic method to evaluate the economic operating performance of existing combined heat and power (CHP) or combined cooling heat and power (CCHP) generation systems is applied. Two key performance indicators are selected to evaluate both the technical and the economic performance, based on operating recording data; the capacity factor and the capital recovery. The case study for eight projects in Athens is presented with the purpose to reveal the current situation of CHP in Greece and identify reasons that are hindering its penetration. Interesting conclusions were reached from the analysis. Only two out of the eight projects managed to achieve the break-even point in less than four years since the beginning of their operation, while oversizing phenomena were noticed in many cases leading in extremely low capacity factors. Keywords: CHP; CCHP; capacity factor; capital recovery; performance evaluation; key performance indicators 1. Introduction As energy demand is growing along with the concerns for climate change, the need to turn towards more sustainable and environmentally friendly energy systems is imperative.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle-To-Everything (V2X) in the Netherlands
    Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) in the Netherlands Marijn Roks – Master Energy Science Internship (GEO4-2520) Netherlands Enterprise Agency – Supervisor: Hielke Schurer Utrecht University – Supervisor: dr. ir. Ioannis Lampropoulos June 2019 1 van 29 (adapted from NewMotion, n.d.) Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 3 2. Stakeholders involved in V2X ........................................................................... 5 3. Business Case ................................................................................................ 9 3.1 Electricity Markets ...................................................................................... 9 3.2 Business case input ................................................................................... 11 3.3 Business case results ................................................................................. 13 4. Battery impact .............................................................................................. 14 4.1 Battery Studies ......................................................................................... 14 4.2 Battery Degradation .................................................................................. 15 5. Legislation and policy ..................................................................................... 17 6. Conclusion ................................................................................................... 19 Bibliography ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C ELECTRICITY
    Chapter VII Appendix C ELECTRICITY QER Report: Energy Transmission, Storage, and Distribution Infrastructure | April 2015 EL-1 Appendix C: ELECTRICITY Highlights Investments in transmission and distribution upgrades and expansions will grow. It is anticipated that in the next two decades, large transmission and distribution investments will replace aging infrastructure; maintain reliability; enable market efficiencies; and aid in meeting policy objectives, such as greenhouse gas reduction and state renewable energy goals. Both long-distance transmission and distributed energy resources can enable lower-carbon electricity. The transmission network can enable connection to high-quality renewables and other lower-carbon resources far from load centers; distributed energy resources can provide local low-carbon power and efficiency. The potential range of new transmission construction is within historic investment magnitudes. Under nearly all scenarios analyzed for the Quadrennial Energy Review, circuit-miles of transmission added through 2030 are roughly equal to those needed under the base case. And while those base case transmission needs are significant, they do not appear to exceed historical yearly build rates. Flexible grid system operations and demand response can enable renewables and reduce the need for new bulk-power-level infrastructure. End-use efficiency, demand response, storage, and distributed generation can reduce the expected costs of new transmission investment. Investments in resilience have multiple benefits. Investments in energy efficiency, smart grid technologies, storage, and distributed generation can contribute to enhanced resiliency and reduced pollution, as well as provide operational flexibility for grid operators. Innovative technologies have significant value for the electricity system. New technologies and data applications are enabling new services and customer choices.
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity Market Report July 2021 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY
    Electricity Market Report July 2021 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines the full spectrum of IEA member countries: Spain energy issues including oil, gas and Australia Sweden coal supply and demand, renewable Austria Switzerland energy technologies, electricity Belgium Turkey markets, energy efficiency, access to Canada United Kingdom energy, demand side management Czech Republic United States and much more. Through its work, the Denmark IEA advocates policies that will Estonia IEA association countries: enhance the reliability, affordability Finland Brazil and sustainability of energy in its 30 France China member countries, 8 association Germany India countries and beyond. Greece Indonesia Hungary Morocco Please note that this publication is Ireland Singapore subject to specific restrictions that Italy South Africa limit its use and distribution. The Japan Thailand terms and conditions are available Korea online at www.iea.org/t&c/ Luxembourg Mexico This publication and any map included herein are Netherlands without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty New Zealand over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the Norway name of any territory, city or area. Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Electricity Market Report – July 2021 Abstract Abstract When the IEA published its first Electricity Market Report in December 2020, large parts of the world were in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic and its resulting lockdowns. Half a year later, electricity demand around the world is rebounding or even exceeding pre-pandemic levels, especially in emerging and developing economies. But the situation remains volatile, with Covid-19 still causing disruptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle-To-Grid Power Fundamentals: Calculating Capacity and Net Revenue Willett Kempton ∗, Jasna Tomic´
    Journal of Power Sources xxx (2005) xxx–xxx Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: Calculating capacity and net revenue Willett Kempton ∗, Jasna Tomic´ University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA Received 12 November 2004; received in revised form 8 December 2004; accepted 8 December 2004 Abstract As the light vehicle fleet moves to electric drive (hybrid, battery, and fuel cell vehicles), an opportunity opens for “vehicle-to-grid” (V2G) power. This article defines the three vehicle types that can produce V2G power, and the power markets they can sell into. V2G only makes sense if the vehicle and power market are matched. For example, V2G appears to be unsuitable for baseload power—the constant round-the- clock electricity supply—because baseload power can be provided more cheaply by large generators, as it is today. Rather, V2G’s greatest near-term promise is for quick-response, high-value electric services. These quick-response electric services are purchased to balance constant fluctuations in load and to adapt to unexpected equipment failures; they account for 5–10% of electric cost—$ 12 billion per year in the US. This article develops equations to calculate the capacity for grid power from three types of electric drive vehicles. These equations are applied to evaluate revenue and costs for these vehicles to supply electricity to three electric markets (peak power, spinning reserves, and regulation). The results suggest that the engineering rationale and economic motivation for V2G power are compelling. The societal advantages of developing V2G include an additional revenue stream for cleaner vehicles, increased stability and reliability of the electric grid, lower electric system costs, and eventually, inexpensive storage and backup for renewable electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Elements of Vehicle-To-Grid (V2G) Economics
    Critical Elements of Vehicle-to- Grid (V2G) Economics Darlene Steward National Renewable Energy Laboratory Produced under direction of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of International Affairs and the Clean Energy Ministerial by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory under Task No. DSEV1030. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Strategic Partnership Project Report NREL/TP-5400-69017 September 2017 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Critical Elements of Vehicle-to- Grid (V2G) Economics Darlene Steward National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared under Task No. DSEV1030 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Strategic Partnership Project Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5400-69017 Golden, CO 80401 September 2017 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This manuscript has been authored by employees of the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC (“Alliance”) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 with the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”). The tables and figures in this report are limited to use in this report only and are not to be further disseminated or used without the permission of the sources cited.
    [Show full text]