DOCSLIB.ORG

V2G a Comprehensive Analysis of Vehicle-To-Grid Technology Worldwide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
V2G a Comprehensive Analysis of Vehicle-To-Grid Technology Worldwide The A to Z of V2G A comprehensive analysis of vehicle-to-grid technology worldwide Laura Jones, Kathryn Lucas-Healey, Björn Sturmberg, Hugo Temby and Monirul Islam January 2021 This report has been created for knowledge sharing as part of the Realising Electric Vehicle to Grid Services project. This Project received funding from ARENA as part of ARENA’s Advancing Renewables Program. The views expressed herein are not necessarily the views of the Australian Government. Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 6 Recommendations............................................................................................................. 9 Standards and rules ....................................................................................................... 9 Customer value proposition ......................................................................................... 10 Open value transfer ..................................................................................................... 11 Fostering an industry ................................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 14 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................ 14 1.2 Scope ................................................................................................................... 14 1.3 Framing ................................................................................................................ 15 1.4 Structure ............................................................................................................... 16 2 Background .................................................................................................................. 18 2.1 The V2G concept .................................................................................................. 18 2.2 Landscape ............................................................................................................ 20 2.2.1 The energy landscape ................................................................................... 21 2.2.2 The transport landscape ................................................................................ 23 2.3 Enabling infrastructures ........................................................................................ 24 2.4 Socio-technical context ......................................................................................... 25 3 Benefits ........................................................................................................................ 27 3.1 New value streams ............................................................................................... 29 3.1.1 To users ......................................................................................................... 29 3.1.2 To service providers ....................................................................................... 33 3.2 Electricity system .................................................................................................. 33 3.2.1 Electricity production ...................................................................................... 33 3.2.2 Electricity delivery .......................................................................................... 46 3.3 Societal co-benefits ............................................................................................... 56 3.3.1 Equity ............................................................................................................ 56 3.3.2 Health and climate ......................................................................................... 57 3.3.3 Trust .............................................................................................................. 57 4 Challenges ................................................................................................................... 59 4.1 Barriers to uptake ................................................................................................. 60 4.1.1 For users ....................................................................................................... 60 4.1.2 For service providers ..................................................................................... 64 4.2 Electricity system .................................................................................................. 65 2 The A to Z of V2G 4.2.1 Electricity production ...................................................................................... 65 4.2.2 Electricity delivery .......................................................................................... 71 4.3 Socio-technical change ......................................................................................... 75 5 Implementation landscape ........................................................................................... 77 5.1 Technology ........................................................................................................... 77 5.1.1 Vehicle ........................................................................................................... 77 5.1.2 Battery degradation........................................................................................ 78 5.1.3 Charger .......................................................................................................... 78 5.1.4 Charging standards........................................................................................ 79 5.1.5 Charger installation ........................................................................................ 80 5.1.6 Software ........................................................................................................ 81 5.1.7 Metering ......................................................................................................... 82 5.2 Markets and policy ................................................................................................ 82 5.2.1 Market reform ................................................................................................ 82 5.2.2 Non-market policies ....................................................................................... 85 5.3 Business models ................................................................................................... 86 5.3.1 Potential aggregators ..................................................................................... 87 5.3.2 Cost stacks and operating costs .................................................................... 88 5.3.3 Bringing it all together: value stacking ............................................................ 89 5.3.4 Impact on other energy market participants ................................................... 90 5.4 Future trends ........................................................................................................ 90 5.4.1 EV Uptake forecasts ...................................................................................... 90 5.4.2 Battery technology ......................................................................................... 92 5.4.3 Autonomous vehicles ..................................................................................... 93 5.4.4 Scope of vehicles ........................................................................................... 93 6 Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 94 Standards and rules ..................................................................................................... 94 Customer value proposition ......................................................................................... 95 Open value transfer ..................................................................................................... 96 Fostering an industry ................................................................................................... 97 6.1 Government policies ............................................................................................. 98 6.1.1 The case for action ........................................................................................ 98 6.1.2 Regulatory reform .......................................................................................... 98 6.1.3 Funded programs .......................................................................................... 99 6.1.4 Advocacy ....................................................................................................... 99 6.1.5 Stakeholder network facilitation ................................................................... 100 6.2 Industry ............................................................................................................... 100 3 The A to Z of V2G 6.2.1 Collaborate .................................................................................................. 100 6.2.2 Develop business models ............................................................................ 101 6.2.3 Develop technical capacity ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trends in Electricity Prices During the Transition Away from Coal by William B
    May 2021 | Vol. 10 / No. 10 PRICES AND SPENDING Trends in electricity prices during the transition away from coal By William B. McClain The electric power sector of the United States has undergone several major shifts since the deregulation of wholesale electricity markets began in the 1990s. One interesting shift is the transition away from coal-powered plants toward a greater mix of natural gas and renewable sources. This transition has been spurred by three major factors: rising costs of prepared coal for use in power generation, a significant expansion of economical domestic natural gas production coupled with a corresponding decline in prices, and rapid advances in technology for renewable power generation.1 The transition from coal, which included the early retirement of coal plants, has affected major price-determining factors within the electric power sector such as operation and maintenance costs, 1 U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS capital investment, and fuel costs. Through these effects, the decline of coal as the primary fuel source in American electricity production has affected both wholesale and retail electricity prices. Identifying specific price effects from the transition away from coal is challenging; however the producer price indexes (PPIs) for electric power can be used to compare general trends in price development across generator types and regions, and can be used to learn valuable insights into the early effects of fuel switching in the electric power sector from coal to natural gas and renewable sources. The PPI program measures the average change in prices for industries based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
    [Show full text]
  • Best Electricity Market Design Practices
    In My View Best Electricity Market Design Practices William W. Hogan (forthcoming in IEEE Power & Energy) Organized wholesale electricity markets in the United States follow the principles of bid-based, security-constrained, economic dispatch with locational marginal prices. The basic elements build on analyses done when large thermal generators dominated the structure of the electricity market in most countries. Notable exceptions were countries like Brazil that utilized large-scale pondage hydro systems. For such systems, the critical problem centered on managing a multi- year inventory of stored water. But for most developed electricity systems, the dominance of thermal generation implied that the major interactions in unit commitment decisions would be measured in hours to days, and the interactions in operating decisions would occur over minutes to hours. As a result, single period economic dispatch became the dominant model for analyzing the underlying basic principles. The structure of this analysis Figure 1: Spot Market integrated the terminology of economics and engineering. As shown in SHORT-RUN ELECTRICITY MARKET Figure 1: Spot Market, the Energy Price Short-Run (¢/kWh) Marginal increasing short-run Cost Price at marginal cost of generation 7-7:30 p.m. defined the dispatch stack or supply curve. Thermal Demand efficiencies and fuel cost 7-7:30 p.m. Price at were the primary sources 9-9:30 a.m. of short-run generation cost Price at Demand differences. The 2-2:30 a.m. 9-9:30 a.m. introduction of markets Demand 2-2:30 a.m. added the demand Q1 Q2 Qmax perspective, where lower MW prices induced higher loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Advantages of Applying Large-Scale Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing
    energies Article Advantages of Applying Large-Scale Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing Dawid Chudy * and Adam Le´sniak Institute of Electrical Power Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, Stefanowskiego Str. 18/22, PL 90-924 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The continuous development of energy storage (ES) technologies and their wider utiliza- tion in modern power systems are becoming more and more visible. ES is used for a variety of applications ranging from price arbitrage, voltage and frequency regulation, reserves provision, black-starting and renewable energy sources (RESs), supporting load-generation balancing. The cost of ES technologies remains high; nevertheless, future decreases are expected. As the most profitable and technically effective solutions are continuously sought, this article presents the results of the analyses which through the created unit commitment and dispatch optimization model examines the use of ES as support for load-generation balancing. The performed simulations based on various scenarios show a possibility to reduce the number of starting-up centrally dispatched generating units (CDGUs) required to satisfy the electricity demand, which results in the facilitation of load-generation balancing for transmission system operators (TSOs). The barriers that should be encountered to improving the proposed use of ES were also identified. The presented solution may be suitable for further development of renewables and, in light of strict climate and energy policies, may lead to lower utilization of large-scale power generating units required to maintain proper operation of power systems. Citation: Chudy, D.; Le´sniak,A. Keywords: load-generation balancing; large-scale energy storage; power system services modeling; Advantages of Applying Large-Scale power system operation; power system optimization Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing.
    [Show full text]
  • Powering Ahead! Making Sense of Business Models in Electric Vehicle Charging
    Powering ahead! Making sense of business models in electric vehicle charging October 2018 In association with Contents Acknowledgements 1 Foreword from Energy UK 2 Setting the scene 4 Our approach 5 Key findings 6 How the charging market stacks up 11 Where does charging take place and 14 how does it work? Bringing your business model to life 26 Deep dive on business models 28 What should you do next? 33 Strategy& is PwC’s global strategy consulting team. We help you transform your business by creating strategy that starts with your greatest strengths and builds in execution at every step. We call this strategy that works, and it delivers immediate impact and lasting value for you. As part of the PwC network, we combine 100 years of strategy consulting experience with PwC’s deep industry and functional capabilities. PwC has more than 250,000 people in 158 countries committed to delivering quality in assurance, tax, and advisory services. Acknowledgements To research and fully understand the constantly evolving landscape that is the electric vehicle charging market, we had the good fortune to speak to a number of companies and individuals who are at the very heart of this transformation. We would like to thank everyone who contributed to the report for their insights and time. Addison Lee – Andrew Wescott and Justin Patterson Chargemaster – Tom Callow Ecotricity – Mark Meyrick EDF Energy – Roy Collins ELEXON – Kevin Spencer Elsden Consultants – Miles Elsden Energy UK – Sam Hollister InstaVolt – Tim Payne National Grid – Graeme Cooper and Thomas Maidonis Ovo Energy – Tom Packenham Pivot Power – Matt Allen Pod Point – James McKemey ScottishPower – Malcom Paterson Tesla Western Power Distribution – Ben Godfrey Powering ahead! Making sense of business models in electric vehicle charging 1 Foreword from Energy UK Lawrence Slade Chief Executive I am delighted to work with PwC to bring their insight to investigating the market dynamics of The EV revolution is already upon us.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioenergy's Role in Balancing the Electricity Grid and Providing Storage Options – an EU Perspective
    Bioenergy's role in balancing the electricity grid and providing storage options – an EU perspective Front cover information panel IEA Bioenergy: Task 41P6: 2017: 01 Bioenergy's role in balancing the electricity grid and providing storage options – an EU perspective Antti Arasto, David Chiaramonti, Juha Kiviluoma, Eric van den Heuvel, Lars Waldheim, Kyriakos Maniatis, Kai Sipilä Copyright © 2017 IEA Bioenergy. All rights Reserved Published by IEA Bioenergy IEA Bioenergy, also known as the Technology Collaboration Programme (TCP) for a Programme of Research, Development and Demonstration on Bioenergy, functions within a Framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of IEA Bioenergy do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of its individual Member countries. Foreword The global energy supply system is currently in transition from one that relies on polluting and depleting inputs to a system that relies on non-polluting and non-depleting inputs that are dominantly abundant and intermittent. Optimising the stability and cost-effectiveness of such a future system requires seamless integration and control of various energy inputs. The role of energy supply management is therefore expected to increase in the future to ensure that customers will continue to receive the desired quality of energy at the required time. The COP21 Paris Agreement gives momentum to renewables. The IPCC has reported that with current GHG emissions it will take 5 years before the carbon budget is used for +1,5C and 20 years for +2C. The IEA has recently published the Medium- Term Renewable Energy Market Report 2016, launched on 25.10.2016 in Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of SAE International Standards Activities Related to Hybrid / Electric Vehicles
    An Overview of SAE International Standards Activities Related to Hybrid / Electric Vehicles Keith Wilson Technical Program Manager, Ground Vehicle Standards 1 Copyright © SAE International. Further use or distribution is not permitted without permission from SAE International. Global Ground Vehicle Standards Structure Executive Standards Committee Specialized Materials Parts Systems Motor Vehicle Truck & Bus Fuels & Lubes Aerospace ConAG Council Vehicles & Processes Management Council Council Council Council Council Council Council Steering Steering Steering Steering Steering Steering Steering Steering Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte Cmte TF TF TF TF TF TF TF TF • 145,000+ SAE members • 8,375 GV Standards Published • 564 GV Technical • 2,900 Companies Committees worldwide • 1,817 GV Standards Maintained • Representatives from 50 • Representatives from 100 • 8,800 GV Committee Countries • 491 GV WIP Standards Countries Members Global Ground Vehicle Standards 2 Copyright © SAE International. Further use or distribution is not permitted without permission from SAE International. SAE EV, Hybrid & Fuel Cell Vehicle Standards Development Hybrid SAE EV / Hybrid Vehicle Steering Committee Heavy Sound Vehicle Wireless Charging ➢ Started – 2005 Charging ➢ Current Committee Membership EV & Hybrid Safety Terminology ▪ > 1100 Individual Participants ▪ > 500 Companies Power Quality for SAE Electric • OEM’s Chargers EV/Hybrid Motor Vehicle Rating Steering • Suppliers Committee First & • Government Fuel Cell Second Emissions Responder • Academia ➢ 10 EV / Hybrid Vehicle Subcommittees Communication & Fuel Cell Interoperability ➢ 4 Fuel Cell Standards Subcommittees Interface ➢ 66 SAE EV, Hybrid, Fuel Cell Vehicle Standards Conductive Published to Date Fuel Cell Charge Performance Couplers Fuel Cell Safety Global Ground Vehicle Standards 3 Copyright © SAE International.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Grid Failure
    Power grid failure Presentation by: Sourabh Kothari Department of Electrical Engineering, CDSE Introduction • A power grid is an interconnected network of transmission lines for supplying electricity from power suppliers to consumers. Any disruptions in the network causes power outages. India has five regional grids that carry electricity from power plants to respective states in the country. • Electric power is normally generated at 11-25kV and then stepped-up to 400kV, 220kV or 132kV for high voltage lines through long distances and deliver the power into a common power pool called the grid. • The grid is connected to load centers (cities) through a sub- transmission network of normally 33kV lines which terminate into a 33kV (or 66kV) substation, where the voltage is stepped-down to 11kV for power distribution through a distribution network at 11kV and lower. • The 3 distinct operation of a power grid are:- 1. Power generation 2. Power transmission 3. Power distribution. Structure of Grids Operations of Power grids • Electricity generation - Generating plants are located near a source of water, and away from heavily populated areas , are large and electric power generated is stepped up to a higher voltage-at which it connects to the transmission network. • Electric power transmission - The transmission network will move the power long distances–often across state lines, and sometimes across international boundaries, until it reaches its wholesale customer. • Electricity distribution - Upon arrival at the substation, the power will be stepped down in voltage—to a distribution level voltage. As it exits the substation, it enters the distribution wiring. Finally, upon arrival at the service location, the power is stepped down again from the distribution voltage to the required service voltage.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Charging Impact on Load Profile
    Electric Vehicle Charging Impact on Load Profile PIA GRAHN Licentiate Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 2013 School of Electrical Engineerging TRITA-EE 2012:065 Royal Institute of Technology ISSN 1653-5146 SE-100 44 Stockholm ISBN 978-91-7501-592-7 SWEDEN Akademisk avhandling som med tillstånd av Kungl Tekniska högskolan framlägges till offentlig granskning för avläggande av Teknologie licentiatexamen i elektrotekniska system torsdagen den 17 januari 2013 klockan 10.00 i i sal E3, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Osquars backe 14, Stockholm. © Pia Grahn, January 2013 Tryck: Eprint AB 2012 iii Abstract One barrier to sustainable development is considered to be greenhouse gas emissions and pollution caused by transport, why climate targets are set around the globe to reduce these emissions. Electric vehicles (EVs), may be a sustainable alternative to internal combustion engine vehicles since having EVs in the car park creates an opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This is due to the efficiency of the electric motor. For EVs with rechargeable batteries the opportunity to reduce emissions is also dependent on the genera- tion mix in the power system. EVs with the possibility to recharge the battery from the power grid are denoted plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) or plug-in- hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). Hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), without external recharging possibility, are not studied, hence the abbreviation EV further covers PHEV and PEV. With an electricity-driven private vehicle fleet, the power system will ex- perience an increased amount of variable electricity consumption that is de- pendent on the charging patterns of EVs. Depending on the penetration level of EVs and the charging patterns, EV integration creates new quantities in the overall load profile that may increase the load peaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations and Standards for Clean Trucks and Buses on the Right Track?
    CPB Corporate Partnership Board Regulations and Standards for Clean Trucks and Buses On the Right Track? Decarbonising Transport Regulations and Standards for Clean Trucks and Buses On the Right Track? Decarbonising Transport The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 62 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, the United States and Uzbekistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroelectric Power -- What Is It? It=S a Form of Energy … a Renewable Resource
    INTRODUCTION Hydroelectric Power -- what is it? It=s a form of energy … a renewable resource. Hydropower provides about 96 percent of the renewable energy in the United States. Other renewable resources include geothermal, wave power, tidal power, wind power, and solar power. Hydroelectric powerplants do not use up resources to create electricity nor do they pollute the air, land, or water, as other powerplants may. Hydroelectric power has played an important part in the development of this Nation's electric power industry. Both small and large hydroelectric power developments were instrumental in the early expansion of the electric power industry. Hydroelectric power comes from flowing water … winter and spring runoff from mountain streams and clear lakes. Water, when it is falling by the force of gravity, can be used to turn turbines and generators that produce electricity. Hydroelectric power is important to our Nation. Growing populations and modern technologies require vast amounts of electricity for creating, building, and expanding. In the 1920's, hydroelectric plants supplied as much as 40 percent of the electric energy produced. Although the amount of energy produced by this means has steadily increased, the amount produced by other types of powerplants has increased at a faster rate and hydroelectric power presently supplies about 10 percent of the electrical generating capacity of the United States. Hydropower is an essential contributor in the national power grid because of its ability to respond quickly to rapidly varying loads or system disturbances, which base load plants with steam systems powered by combustion or nuclear processes cannot accommodate. Reclamation=s 58 powerplants throughout the Western United States produce an average of 42 billion kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year, enough to meet the residential needs of more than 14 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation of Customer Load Profiles Based on Smart-Metering Time
    Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale DII Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione DEI TESI DI LAUREA MAGISTRALE IN INGEGNERIA DELL'ENERGIA ELETTRICA Generation of customer load profiles based on smart-metering time series, building-level data and aggregated measurements RELATORI: Prof. Andrea Alberto Pietracaprina Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione (DEI) Universit`adegli Studi di Padova Dr. Andreas Ulbig Adaptricity AG, Power Systems Laboratory Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Svizzera Prof. Pierre Pinson Department of Electrical Engineering Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Danimarca LAUREANDO: Damiano Toffanin ANNO ACCADEMICO 2015/2016 Abstract Many countries are rolling out new devices to measure household electricity consumption, the so-called \smart meters". These devices can be remotely read and are able to measure consumption multiple times per day, usually every 15 or 30 minutes in European countries. Such abundance of data allows to achieve very detailed insight on consumption patterns and power flows in distribution networks. Nevertheless, smart meters have not been rolled out everywhere yet: some areas of the distribution grid are only partially covered, others are not covered at all. The latter are \blind grid areas" from the perspective of the grid operator. This is likely to be the typical European situation, at least for the next decade. Therefore, it becomes important to provide an estimation on how these \blind grid areas" behave. This can be done by a proper exploitation of the previously unseen abundance of data. The research focus is to generate load profiles estimating a realistic consumption for a specific blind area. This thesis illustrates a model based on machine learning techniques and Markov chains for generating realistic Synthesized Load Profiles (SLPs) to model consumption of buildings not equipped with smart meters.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Power Sector Outlook 2021 Rapid Transition Continues to Reshape Country’S Electricity Generation
    Dennis Wamsted, IEEFA Energy Analyst 1 Seth Feaster, IEEFA Data Analyst David Schlissel, IEEFA Director of Resource Planning Analysis March 2021 U.S. Power Sector Outlook 2021 Rapid Transition Continues To Reshape Country’s Electricity Generation Executive Summary The scope and speed of the transition away from fossil fuels, particularly coal, has been building for the past decade. That transition, driven by the increasing adoption of renewable energy and battery storage, is now nearing exponential growth, particularly for solar. The impact in the next two to three years is going to be transformative. In recognition of this growth, IEEFA’s 2021 outlook has been expanded to include separate sections covering wind and solar, battery storage, coal, and gas— interrelated segments of the power generation sector that are marked by vastly different trajectories: • Wind and solar technology improvements and the resulting price declines have made these two generation resources the least-cost option across much of the U.S. IEEFA expects wind and solar capacity installations to continue their rapid rise for the foreseeable future, driven not only by their cost advantage but also by their superior environmental characteristics. • Coal generation capacity has fallen 32% from its peak 10 years ago—and its share of the U.S. electricity market has fallen even faster, to less than 20% in 2020. IEEFA expects the coal industry’s decline to accelerate as the economic competition from renewables and storage intensifies; operational experience with higher levels of wind and solar grows; and public concern about climate change rises. • Gas benefitted in the 2010s from the fracking revolution and the assumption that it offered a bridge to cleaner generation.
    [Show full text]