Common Questions About the Program About the Orlando Stops Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Common Questions About the Program About the Orlando Stops Program COMMON QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PROGRAM ABOUT THE ORLANDO STOPS PROGRAM 1) Why has the City of Orlando decided to implement the Orlando Stops Safety Program? According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, annually nearly 2 million crashes occur in intersections. In 2005, red light running resulted in 800 fatalities and over 165,000 injuries. It is believed that an automated red light camera program will reduce the number of red light crashes and injuries associated with such crashes. The purpose of this program is to increase traffic safety in the City of Orlando. 2) How does the red light camera system work? The cameras are activated by sensors which are located at the intersection. The system is only activated when a vehicle fails to stop for a red light before entering the intersection. The camera takes digital photos and video which record the event. The cameras operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week and in all weather conditions. 3) What is the Traffic Infraction Officer’s job? A Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer reviews the captured event in order to determine if in fact the vehicle violated the traffic law. The officer’s job is to view the images and video and determine if the vehicle entered into the intersection while the vehicle was faced with a red traffic signal. Entering the intersection while faced with a red traffic signal constitutes an infraction. A Notice of Violation is approved by the officer and sent by the City of Orlando to the registered owner of the vehicle. 4) May I speak with the Traffic Infraction Officer that issued my violation? Yes, call 407-246-2060 and provide your NOV number. NOTICE OF VIOLATION QUESTIONS 5) What are the images shown on my Notice of Violation? Notices of Violation contain three images; A) The vehicles license plate/tag indentifying the vehicle and its registered owner. B) The vehicle--- before it enters the intersection vehicle is faced with a red traffic light signal. C) The vehicle--- is in the intersection and still faced with a red traffic light signal. 6) Where do I go to view the images and video of my violation? Go to www.violationinfo.com Enter your NOV# and Pin # 7) I received a Notice of Violation, and I viewed the images and video online. What are my options? The owner has 60 days to take one of four options: (a) Pay the $158 statutory penalty; (b) Submit an affidavit transferring the liability to the driver at the time of the violation; 1 If the owner submits an affidavit establishing the liability of another driver, the driver identified in the affidavit will be sent a Notice of Violation. (c) Establish one of the other statutory exemptions from liability; (d) Request a hearing before a local hearing officer. If the owner does not take one of the four options specified in (a) through (d) within the 60-day notice of violation period, a Uniform Traffic Citation will be issued to the owner in the amount of $262.00. UTC’s are payable to Orange County Courthouse. 8) How is the Notice of Violation sent to the vehicle owner? -The Notice of Violation is sent to the registered owner of the vehicle by first class mail. NOV envelopes are scanned and logged in order to record its delivery date. 9) Why did I receive this Notice of Violation? Based on the Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer’s review of images and video, your vehicle failed to stop before entering the crosswalk when faced with a red traffic light signal. 10) Where can I go to view the best quality images? Go to www.violationinfo.com and enter your NOV number and Pin number. 11) Where can I view the video recording of the violation? Go to www.violationinfo.com and enter your NOV number and Pin number. 12) Where can I find the Notice of Violation number and Pin number? Both numbers are located on the lower shaded half of the Notice of Violation. 13) Can I set up a payment plan for the civil penalty indicated on the Notice of Violation? No. The civil penalty must be paid in full. 14) How many days do I have to pay the Notice of Violation? -You have 60 days from the date the Notice was issued. The due date is indicated on the Notice. 15) How many days do I have to request an administrative hearing on a Notice of Violation? You have 60 days from the date the Notice was issued. The due date is indicated on the Notice. 16) What happens if I ignore the Notice of Violation? A Uniform Traffic Citation will be issued in the amount of $262.00. 17) Does the Notice of Violation affect my driver’s license? No points are assessed against your driver’s license in the state of Florida for red light camera violations. Also, payment of this violation will result in no record entry linked to your driver’s license. However, the issuance of a Uniform Traffic Citation may result in a record entry linked to your driver’s license. 18) What will happen if I forget to pay the Notice of Violation? Once the due date on the Notice expires, a Uniform Traffic Citation will be issued in the amount of $262.00. 19) What is the difference between a Notice of Violation and Uniform Traffic Citation? - A Notice of Violation is handled by the issuing municipality as a local civil violation. It’s an opportunity to pay a lesser amount of $158.00. It never shows up on your driving record, or County Courthouse Traffic Record. 2 - A Uniform Traffic Citation is a charging affidavit and is identical to a citation issued by a law enforcement officer if you were pulled over for a red light traffic violation. It will show up on the County Courthouse Traffic Record and may show up on your driving record. 20) Can I pay the Notice of Violation by telephone? -Yes, call toll free 855-536-8259 (must call on or before the due date). There are no processing fees 21) I was not driving the vehicle at the time of the violation. -Go to our website and fill out a sworn Affidavit of Defense. You will need the driver’s; A) Full Name B) Full Address C) Full Date of Birth and D) Driver’s License Number (if known). This form must be completely and properly filled out and signed in front of a Notary Public. This form must be submitted on or before the due date indicated on the Notice of Violation. 22) How does a Notice of Violation become a Uniform Traffic Citation? -When an individual fails to take any action within the sixty (60) days from the date the Notice of Violation is issued. Once an individual requests a hearing, pays the penalty, or submits an Affidavit of Defenses, a Uniform Traffic Citation will not be issued to that individual. PAYING THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION 23) What are my payment options for the Notice of Violation? A) Pay in person at Orlando City Hall, 400 South Orange Ave, Orlando Florida 32801. B) Pay online: www.violationinfo.com C) Pay by mail: City of Orlando, P.O. Box 4990 Orlando, Florida 32802-4990. D) Pay by Phone: call 1-855-536-8259. (Have NOV number and Pin number available). 24) Can I set up a payment plan on a Notice of Violation? No. The $158.00 civil penalty must be paid in full. 25) Can I pay the civil penalty of $158.00 at the Orange County Court house? -No. The courthouse does not have any knowledge of the violation since the Uniform Traffic Citation has not been issued yet. Please make payment to the City of Orlando, Orlando Stops 400 S. Orange Ave Orlando, Florida 32802. 26) Why is payment not accepted via internet or phone once it is past the due date on the Notice of Violation? -Because a Uniform Traffic Citation is about to be issued for the amount of $262.00. 27) Can I pay the Notice of Violation by credit card or debit card? -Yes, if the Notice is not past due. There are no processing fees. 28) Can I pay the NOV with a personal bank check? 3 -Yes, please include the NOV number on the check. 29) What if I lost the Notice of Violation that was mailed to me? -Call 407-246-2060 and have the license plate/tag number of the vehicle available. 30) What happens when I pay the Notice of Violation penalty amount of $158.00? If the penalty amount is paid on or before the due date indicated on the Notice of Violation, the Uniform Traffic Citation will not be issued and the case will be closed. TRANSFERRING THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION 31) Why is the Notice of Violation sent to the registered owner of the vehicle, and not to the person who was driving the vehicle at the time of the violation? Pursuant to Florida Statute, the registered owner of the vehicle is deemed responsible for their vehicle since the vehicle is the property of the owner. Much like a parking ticket, there is no need to identify the driver of the vehicle. 32) What if I am the registered owner of the vehicle, but not the driver of the vehicle at the time of the violation? The registered owner may fill out a sworn Affidavit of Defense; you will need the driver’s. A) Full Name B) Address C) Date of Birth and Driver’s License Number if known.
Recommended publications
  • Traffic Safety Resource Guide
    TRAFFIC SAFETY RESOURCE GUIDE International Association of Chiefs of Police TRAFFIC SAFETY RESOURCE GUIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY RESOURCE GUIDE Cover Images Credits: National Sheriffs’ Association and the New York State Police Version: December 8, 2017 @ 1100 hrs. Disclaimer: This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its content or use thereof. If trade or manufacturers’ names or products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE 1 TRAFFIC SAFETY RESOURCE GUIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY RESOURCE GUIDE INTRODUCTION Police officers in the United States today know all too and others who best understand what the key issues are. well how challenging it has become to ensure the safe The IACP has learned anecdotally that police officers movement of traffic on the roadways. Factors such have been known to carry the Guide in their patrol vehicle as distracted driving, both alcohol and drug-impaired trunk, while at the same time, police chiefs use the Guide motorists, an increase in total miles driven, and newly in planning for meetings with their city manager, elected emerging considerations such as autonomous vehicles, officials, and community groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Speed Enforcement Pilot Project Evaluation
    Automated Speed Enforcement Pilot Project Evaluation Final Report as Submitted to the Legislature Prepared by the Washington Traffic Safety Commission As Required by ESSB 5352, Section 201(2) December 30, 2010 as revised: January 18, 2011 Publication and Contact Information A PDF version of this report is available for download on the Washington Traffic Safety Commission website at: http://www-stage.wtsc.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/01/ASEReport123010.pdf For more information contact: Steve Lind Deputy Director Washington Traffic Safety Commission PO Box 40944 Olympia, WA 98504-0944 Phone: 360.725.9897 Email: [email protected] Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information Persons with disabilities may request this information be prepared and supplied in alternate formats by calling the Washington Traffic Safety Commission at (360) 725-9898. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may call access Washington State Telecommunications Relay Service by dialing 7-1-1 and asking to be connected to (360) 725-9898. [This page intentionally left blank] ii TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS ............................................................................................................ iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ v INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Smarter Traffic Monitoring with Axis Network Video Solutions
    Transportation The road to smarter traffic monitoring with Axis network video solutions. www.axis.com/traffic Bringing you closer By 2025, it’s predicted that every day 6.2 billion private motorized trips will be made in cities worldwide*. That means more roads, more road users to the and even greater pressure to get everyone from A to B, safely and efficiently. It’s a huge challenge for traffic management centers – and a testing time for traffic traffic. monitoring technology. Roads don’t run on guesswork. Together with our partners, we offer Traffic management centers need smart solutions that give you a broader, instant access to accurate, real-time deeper understanding of the traffic information – 24/7. Only then, can situation – in any conditions. you detect incidents early and respond quickly. That’s where Axis traffic monitoring solutions can help. *SOURCE: International Association of Public Transport, 2013 www.uitp.org/news/pics/pdf/PTX21.pdf Traffic | 3 From congestion and stopped vehicles to serious accidents and extreme weather, we understand the challenges you face every day. We know it’s not just important to improve the traffic situation in real time, but also over time. That’s why we’ve developed the right solutions to help you achieve this. With our 30 years of experience, spanning a broad range of industries from retail and transport to education and healthcare, we’ve been able to develop technology that can perform in any condition and bring unique value to each user group. Our traffic monitoring solutions put you at the heart of the action Aware, and help you keep the traffic flowing smoothly – at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Analysis 133Rd General Assembly Click Here for H.B
    OHIO LEGISLATIVE SERVICE COMMISSION Office of Research Legislative Budget www.lsc.ohio.gov and Drafting Office H.B. 62 Bill Analysis 133rd General Assembly Click here for H.B. 62’s Fiscal Analysis Version: As Passed by the House Primary Sponsor: Rep. Oelslager Effective Date: Margaret Marcy, Attorney Carlen Zhang-D’Souza, Attorney Joe McDaniels, Attorney Table of Contents Department of Taxation ................................................................................................................. 3 Motor fuel excise tax ...................................................................................................................... 5 Rate ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Motor fuel use tax ........................................................................................................................... 5 Addition to tax base ........................................................................................................................ 6 Revenue distribution ....................................................................................................................... 6 Allowances, discounts, and refunds ............................................................................................... 7 Transit and school buses ............................................................................................................ 7 Transit contractor refund ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vision Zero's Enforcement Problem: Using Community Engagement to Craft 2018 Equitable Traffic Safety Strategies 6
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Vision Zero’s Enforcement Problem Using community engagement to craft equitable traffic safety strategies A comprehensive project submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Urban & Regional Planning by: Rabi Abonour Client: Alta Planning + Design Faculty Chair of Committee: Professor Evelyn Blumenberg Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 2018-34 N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Vision Zero's Enforcement Problem: Using community engagement to craft 2018 equitable traffic safety strategies 6. Performing Organization Code UCLA-ITS 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Rabi Abonour LAS1804 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, UCLA N/A 3320 Public Affairs Building 11. Contract or Grant No. Los Angeles, CA 90095-1656 2018-34 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies www.ucits.org 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI: doi:10.17610/T6MS3Q 16. Abstract Traffic fatalities are increasing in America, and cities are increasingly turning to a traffic safety framework called Vision Zero to combat this problem America Vision Zero plans generally include law enforcement as one strategy, which has drawn criticism from activists concerned about racially biased policing. This report analyzes the relationship between Vision Zero and racial justice, focusing on how cities conduct targeted stakeholder engagement and how this engagement affects the ways in which concerns about racially biased policing are incorporated into Vision Zero plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Prediction Framework for Openstreetmap Using Deep
    Traffic Prediction Framework for OpenStreetMap Using Deep Learning Based Complex Event Processing and Open Traffic Cameras Piyush Yadav1 Lero-SFI Irish Software Research Centre, Data Science Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland [email protected] Dipto Sarkar Department of Geography, University College Cork, Ireland [email protected] Dhaval Salwala Insight Centre for Data Analytics, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland Edward Curry Insight Centre for Data Analytics, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland [email protected] Abstract Displaying near-real-time traffic information is a useful feature of digital navigation maps. However, most commercial providers rely on privacy-compromising measures such as deriving location in- formation from cellphones to estimate traffic. The lack of an open-source traffic estimation method using open data platforms is a bottleneck for building sophisticated navigation services on top of OpenStreetMap (OSM). We propose a deep learning-based Complex Event Processing (CEP) method that relies on publicly available video camera streams for traffic estimation. The proposed framework performs near-real-time object detection and objects property extraction across camera clusters in parallel to derive multiple measures related to traffic with the results visualized on OpenStreetMap. The estimation of object properties (e.g. vehicle speed, count, direction) provides multidimensional data that can be leveraged to create metrics and visualization for congestion beyond commonly used density-based measures. Our approach couples both flow and count measures during interpolation by considering each vehicle as a sample point and their speed as weight. We demonstrate multidimensional traffic metrics (e.g. flow rate, congestion estimation) over OSM by processing 22 traffic cameras from London streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Practice for the Operation of CCTV Enforcement Cameras for Parking London Borough of Islington
    Code of Practice for the Operation of CCTV Enforcement Cameras for Parking London Borough of Islington London Councils Version 2.3 June 2006 Update by Islington June 2011 CONTENTS Title Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Commitment and Responsibility 1 1.3 Code of Practice 1 2. THE OPERATION OF CCTV ENFORCEMENT CAMERAS 3 2.1 CCTV Camera Surveillance 3 2.2 The Legal Framework 3 2.3 Enforcement of Traffic Regulations by CCTV 4 2.4 Operation of the System 6 2.5 Retention and Use of Evidence 7 2.6 Guidelines for Appeals 9 2.7 Security of Operations 11 2.8 Procedures Manual 11 2.9 Operating Personnel 11 APPENDICES 1. Particulars of Operating Authority 13 2. Example CCTV Control Room Log Sheet 14 3. Example CCTV Enforcement Log 15 4. Sample Authorised Officer Witness Statement (Parking Contraventions) 16 5. Sample Authorised Officer Witness Statement (Bus Lane Contraventions) 17 6. Sample Authorised Officer Witness Statement (Moving Traffic Contraventions) 18 7. Right to Request the Attendance at Appeal of the Person Signing the Authorised 19 Officer Witness Statement (Bus Lane Appeals) 8. Glossary of Terms 20 9. London Councils TEC approved training courses for CCTV operators 22 10. DfT Camera Approval for Bus Lanes 23 11. DfT Camera Approval for Parking Contravention 24 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.1.1 Since 1999 the London Boroughs and Transport for London have been using CCTV cameras to enforce traffic regulations. The introduction of enforcement of traffic regulations by CCTV cameras is one part of a wide-ranging programme of measures to improve the reliability and punctuality of public transport, reduce congestion and pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Watching? Video Camera Surveillance in New York City and the Need for Public Oversight
    WHO’S WATCHING? VIDEO CAMERA SURVEILLANCE IN NEW YORK CITY AND THE NEED FOR PUBLIC OVERSIGHT A Special Report by the New York Civil Liberties Union F A L L 2 0 0 6 NYCLU_whoswatching.indd 1 11/21/06 12:44:42 PM 125 Broad Street, New York, NY 10004 212.607.3300 Donna Lieberman Executive Director This report was written by Loren Siegel, Robert A. Perry, and Margaret Hunt Gram on behalf of the New York Civil Liberties Union, a non-partisan organization dedicated to preserving and defending the principles set forth in the Bill of Rights. It was designed by Michael J. Balzano, who generously donated his time. The maps were created by Veronica Olazabal. The NYCLU thanks the following individuals and groups for their work on this project: Andrew Adams Alec Miller Michael J. Balzano Martin Miller Chris Calabrese Indrani Mondal Chris Dunn NYCBORDC Surveillance Camera Project Nanette Francia-Cotter Udi Ofer James Garren Peter Pantelis Yanilda Gonzalez Stephanie Robins Susanna Groves David Solomon Beth Haroules Nathan Stamm Jamarah Harris Alex Stone-Tharp Miriam Hurwitz The Surveillance Camera Players Molly Jacobs-Meyer Irum Taqi Gwendolyn Leachman Ana Vasquez Donna Lieberman Igor Volynets NYCLU_whoswatching.indd 2 11/21/06 12:44:42 PM TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Camera Count Ready, Fire, Aim!? DO VIDEO SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Road Traffic Enforcement: Regulation, Governance and Use a Review
    Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Automated Road Traffic Enforcement: Regulation, Governance and Use A review Dr Adam Snow Liverpool Hope University October 2017 The Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd is a transport policy and research organisation which explores the economic, mobility, safety and environmental issues relating to roads and their users. The Foundation publishes independent and authoritative research with which it promotes informed debate and advocates policy in the interest of the responsible motorist. RAC Foundation 89–91 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HS Tel no: 020 7747 3445 www.racfoundation.org Registered Charity No. 1002705 October 2017 © Copyright Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Automated Road Traffic Enforcement: Regulation, Governance and Use A review Dr Adam Snow Liverpool Hope University October 2017 About the Author Dr Adam Snow is a lecturer in criminology at Liverpool Hope University. His research expertise lies in the field of road traffic, road safety and parking enforcement. He has produced research reports for a variety of organisations that are involved in parking enforcement and road traffic regulation. His most recent work involved examining (with colleagues from the University of Birmingham) public perceptions of the Traffic Penalty Tribunal's online case management system. His research examines public expectations and experiences of regulation and punishment, and the perceived legitimacy of such enforcement systems. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Professor Sally Kyd of Leicester University and Dr Helen Wells of Keele University for their support in getting the project off the ground and their helpful comments throughout the process. The author and the RAC Foundation would like to thank the peer reviewers for their helpful comments on drafts of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Part IV: Digital & Interactive Technologies Photo Enforcement Cameras, Pedestrian Activated Signs and Driver Feedback Signs
    In the world of traffic calming, options to reduce speeding drivers, to increase pedestrian and motorist safety, and to improve the quality of life within a community are constantly evolving. This docum​ent is the fourth and final installment in a series of 21st Century Traffic Calming guides that analyze engineered traffic­calming solutions. Part IV: Digital & Interactive Technologies Photo Enforcement Cameras, Pedestrian Activated Signs and Driver Feedback Signs The digital age has brought revolutionary advancements to the transportation industry. Lights provide advance warnings and signs can now communicate unique, important and timely messages to motorists as they travel neighborhood streets and major thoroughfares. These new technologies can also act as valuable supplements to law enforcement officers. PHOTO ENFORCEMENT CAMERAS These automated enforcement devices are used to detect speeding, the running of red lights, and other traffic violations such as illegal rail crossings, toll violations and school bus stop-arm infractions. While they can be effective, many are controversial. According to the ​Governors Highway Safety Association​ as of October 2014, photo enforcement cameras are currently in use for either speed enforcement or traffic light enforcement in 24 states, although many are extremely limited in scope and may only be operated within local ordinances or in cities with certain population thresholds. Enforcement cameras have provoked ​great controversy​. Their use has resulted in numerous court cases and a number of government entities have ultimately ended their programs amid public outcry. As a result, speed cameras are prohibited in 13 U.S. states and red-light cameras are prohibited in 10 states. 21st Century Traffic Calming Guide: Digital & Interactive Technologies Page 1 ©2015​ ​Radarsign Speed Cameras Speed camera systems use a variety of detectors to determine the speed of vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Video Analytics Bellevue, Washington Microsoft Corp
    Traffic Video Analytics Bellevue, Washington Microsoft Corp. Case Study Report December 2019 Executive Summary Traffic safety and traffic congestion represent one of the biggest problems in modern cities, and improving these is a major promise of smart cities of the future. Microsoft collaborated with the City of Bellevue to use video camera feeds for traffic video analytics. The partnership’s vision was to use the widely deployed traffic camera feeds for traffic analytics on road users as opposed to traditional mechanical or manual approaches. A primary objective of the partnership was to evaluate if video analytics can produce accurate outputs on live video feeds to produce actionable insights to inform Vison Zero strategies. Bellevue is committed to implementing a Vision Zero Action Plan, with the goal of zero traffic deaths and serious injuries by 2030. The Microsoft team developed a video analytics platform that analyzed videos to produce directional counts of traffic users (vehicles, bicycles, etc.). The results were aggregated into a video analytics dashboard, that was deployed at the City of Bellevue’s Traffic Management Center from Jul 2017 to Nov 2018, and produced live alerts on abnormal traffic volumes. The dashboard also helped Bellevue transportation planners understand traffic patterns over long periods of time. For example, it provided the perspective on vehicle and bicycle patterns, prior to and after construction of a dedicated bicycle lane on 108th Avenue. Finally, the video analytics system‘s insights on directional volumes and unusual traffic patterns provided an additional tool for real-time traffic operations in the Bellevue Traffic Management Center. Key Outcomes • The City of Bellevue’s Traffic Management Center deployed the dashboard of directional traffic volumes that provided live data as well as alerts based on historical volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cityworksand Distribution Final Report
    TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT CENTERS Streaming Video Sharing CITYWORKSand Distribution Final Report FHWA-HOP-19-037 SEPTEMBER 2019 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This document is for guidance only and does not create any requirements other than those stipulated in statute or regulation. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. The FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-19-037 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Transportation Management Centers Streaming Video Sharing September 2019 and Distribution 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Michael L. Pack, Nikola Ivanov, Elizabeth Birriel Report No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Leidos 11251 Roger Bacon Drive 11. Contract or Grant No. Reston, VA 20190 Contract No. DTFH61-16-D-00053 Michael Pack, LLC, Columbia, Maryland 20145 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13.
    [Show full text]