DOCSLIB.ORG

Foreign Royalty and Balkan Thrones in the 19Th Century – the Case Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foreign Royalty and Balkan Thrones in the 19Th Century – the Case Of 2021-4234-HIS – 04 MAY 2021 th 1 "Foreign Royalty and Balkan Thrones in the 19 2 Century – The Case of Serbia" 3 4 This article will explore and explain the reasons and circumstances behind 5 this.The article describes several attempts in installing foreign monarchs in 6 Serbia. The modern Serbian monarchyexisted from 1804 to 1918, while in 7 Montenegro a secular monarchy which was strongly related to Serbian state 8 traditions was established in 1852 and dissolved after the end of WWI. 9 During the period of the existence of national monarchies in the Balkans 10 (during the 19th and first half of the 20th century),foreign dynasties were 11 installedon the thrones of all Balkan national states, save Serbia and 12 Montenegro.. The main hypothesisis that the interests and aspirations of 13 Austria-Hungary and Russia stopped all of the said attempts 14 15 16 Serbia and the Monarchy in the 19th Century 17 18 The status of Serbia was defined during the 19th century. Until the 19 Uprising against Ottoman rule in 1804, Serbs did not enjoy any kind of 20 autonomy. The rebel state and later the autonomous principality was 21 established in the Belgrade Pashalik, previously a military-administrative 22 territory at the Northern border of the Ottoman Empire, and had the same status 23 as other pashaliks. 1 During the First Serbian Uprising (1804-1813) the 24 Belgrade Pashalik and some neighbouring territories were united together in a 25 revolutionary state 2 in which ahereditary monarchy was established. Black 26 George (Karadjordje Petrovich3), the leader of the First Serbian Uprising, thus 27 became the first monarch of modern Serbia. 28 Defined by the constitutional laws in 1808 and 1811, the post of the 29 modern Serbian monarch was not overwhelmingly influenced from abroad – 30 even including from Russia, which was a protector of the Serbian uprising.4 31 The institution of monarchy, however,was abolished after the uprising had 32 failed. The later autonomy of Serbia - instigated following the victory of the 33 Holy Alliance (which was spearheaded by Russia) and the Second Serbian 34 Uprising (1815) – was, however, based on the ideas of the uprising as well as 35 on the concepts defined during the last decade of the 18th century. The 36 foundation of the autonomy –based on experiences following the long 37 negotiations which coincided with the Greek War for Independence, the 38 internationalisation of the Eastern Question and the imposing of the reforms to 39 the Ottoman Empire - was the institution of the monarch as the chief of state. 1Roger Viers Paxton, Russia and the First Serbian Revolution: A Diplomatic and Political Study. The Initial Phase, 1804–1807, (Stanford University: Stanford 1968), 11-13. 2Wayne S. Vucinich, The First Serbian Uprising, 1804–1813, (Social Science Monographs, Brooklyn College Press, 1982), 21-27 3(Karadjordje Petrovich, KaraĊorĊe Petrović, Карађорђе Петровић). 4Miloš Blagojević, "Arhiepiskop Sava - vožd otaĉastva". u: Ćirković S. [ur.] Sveti Sava u srpskoj istoriji i tradiciji - Međunarodni naučni skup, (SANU: Beograd, 1998), 64-73. 1 2021-4234-HIS – 04 MAY 2021 1 The autonomy of the Serbian Principality that had been defined by the 2 Sultans hatti-sherifs decreed from 1829 to 1838, had the institution of Prince as 3 its main pillar. Since 1830, the Obrenovich5 dynasty was established6 and its 4 ruling members carried the title of prince. 5 The principality of Serbia thus had two dynasties - the ruling and 6 pretending one- which fought over the throne until 1903. 7 8 9 National Dynasties, Foreign Candidates 10 11 Except for Serbia, all other nations in the Balkans in the 19th century were 12 ruled by foreign dynasties. 13 From 1832, Greece was ruled by the Wittelsbach dynasty, and 30 years 14 later by the Glücksburgdynasty7. Following the unification of Wallachia and 15 Moldavia, the rule of elected princes from the ranks of the Constantinople 16 Phanariots was abolished. Initially, the Romanian AlexandruIoanCuza was the 17 ruler, but was toppled in the 1860s and replaced by Prince Karl of 18 Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen 8 The autonomous Bulgarian principality was 19 founded following the 1878 Congress in Berlin, and ruled by Alexander of 20 Battenberg, who was replaced several years later due to his support for the 21 Plovdiv Coup. He was succeededby Ferdinand of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. 22 Even in Albania, which was proclaimedas an independent state in 1912, 23 Wilhelm of Wied was erected as its prince. 24 Therefore, out of the six national states established in the Balkans, four 25 had foreign dynasties and only two – which were, at the time, predominantly 26 inhabited by Serbs – had their own. The reasons for this are not explicitly 27 explained in historiography. 28 Placing national candidates on the thrones of the other four states was not 29 rejected in principle. AlexandruIoanCuza thus became the first ruler of the 30 united Romanian state, while the first head of modern Greece was a Russian 31 diplomat of Greek origins - IoannisAntoniosKapodistrias. He was the 32 "governor" of Greece, which at its beginnings was classified as a republic. 33 Kapodistrias remained at that post for less than four years (1828-1831) when 34 was assassinated. He was succeeded by his brother Augustinos Kapodistrias 35 who managed to sustain the “first republic” for another six months. 36 The international status of those states was also not an issue. The 37 Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen and the Saxe-Coburg and Gotha would rule as the 38 Ottoman tributaries for decades. The latter would, together with the title of 5(The Obrenovich, Obrenovići, Обреновићи). 6'Obrenović dynasty, Serbian family', Encyclopaedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/ topic/Obrenovic-dynasty, (visted on 21 April 2021). 7John Van der Kiste, Kings of the Hellenes, (Stroud, Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing, 1994), 9-13. 8Carol I or Charles I of Romania (20 April 1839 – 27 September [O.S. 10 October] 1914). see. Keith Hitchins, Rumania 1866–1947 (Oxford University Press, 1994), 31-37. 2 2021-4234-HIS – 04 MAY 2021 1 prince of autonomous Bulgaria, bear the post of sultan's general-governor of 2 the Autonomous Province of Eastern Rumelia. 3 Curiously, only German princes were brought as rulers of the Balkan 4 thrones during the 19th century. It is believed that the reasoning behind this was 5 that just princes of the former Holy Roman Empire were perceived as fit and 6 deserving to wear the crowns of “newly” established states. 7 There are two possible reasons why this was never the case in Serbia and 8 Montenegro. The first lies in the interests of the Habsburg monarchy. The 9 second comes down to the fact that Serbia was – in name - included in the title 10 of the Hapsburg monarch. In 1914 the title read: 11 Seine Kaiserliche und KöniglicheApostolischeMajestätvonGottes Gnaden 12 Kaiser von Österreich;König von Ungarn und Böhmen, von Dalmatien, 13 Kroatien, Slawonien, Galizien, Lodomerien und Illyrien;König von Jerusalem 14 etc.;Erzherzog von Österreich;Großherzog von Toskana und Krakau;Herzog 15 von Lothringen, von Salzburg, Steyer, Kärnten, Krain und der Bukowina; 16 Großfürst von Siebenbürgen, Markgraf von Mähren; Herzog von Ober- und 17 Niederschlesien, von Modena, Parma, Piacenza und Guastalla, von Auschwitz 18 und Zator, von Teschen, Friaul, Ragusa und Zara;Gefürsteter Graf von 19 Habsburg und Tirol, von Kyburg, Görz und Gradisca;Fürst von Trient und 20 Brixen;Markgraf von Ober- und Niederlausitz und in Istrien;Graf von 21 Hohenems, Feldkirch, Bregenz, Sonnenberg etc.;Herr von Triest, von Cattaro 22 und auf der WindischenMark;Großwojwode der WoiwodschaftSerbienetc., etc9 23 In English: 24 25 His Imperial and Royal Apostolic Majesty,By the Grace of 26 God Emperor of Austria,King of 27 Hungary and Bohemia, Dalmatia, Croatia, Slavonia, Galicia, Lodomeria and Ill 28 yria; 29 King of Jerusalem, etc.;Archduke of Austria;Grand Duke of 30 Tuscany and Cracow; 31 Duke of Lorraine, Salzburg, Styria, Carinthia, Carniola and Bukovina;Grand 32 Prince of Transylvania, Margrave of Moravia;Duke of Upper and Lower 33 Silesia, of Modena, Parma, Piacenza and Guastalla, of Auschwitz and Zator, 34 of Teschen, Friaul, Ragusa and Zara;Princely Count of Habsburg and Tyrol, 35 of Kyburg, Gorizia and Gradisca;Prince of Trento and Brixen;Margrave of 36 Upper and Lower Lusatia and in Istria;Count of 37 Hohenems, Feldkirch, Bregenz, Sonnenberg etc.; 38 Lord of Trieste, of Cattaro and on the Windic March;Grand Voivode of the 39 Voivodeship of Serbiaetc., etc. 40 41 This title, therefore, also included the ruling rights over Serbia. The 42 Austrian Archduke, who was until 1806 also the Emperor, since 1527 had the 9J. H. W. Verzijl, International Law in Historical Perspective, Volume VI: Juridical Facts as Sources of International Rights and Obligations, (Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff, 1973), 173. 3 2021-4234-HIS – 04 MAY 2021 1 title of the king of Hungary which also included Serbia. During the 15th century 2 this title read (*in English): 3 "By the grace of God, king of Hungary, Bohemia, Dalmatia, Croatia, 4 Rama, Serbia, Galicia, Lodomeria, Romania, and Bulgaria, Duke of Silesia and 5 Luxemburg and Margrave of Moravia and Lusatia, for the everlasting memory 6 of the matter. It is fitting that kings and princes who by heavenly decree are 7 placed at the summit of the highest office, be adorned not only by arms but also 8 by laws and that the people subjected to them, as well as the reins of authority, 9 are restrained by the strength of good and stable institutions rather than by the 10 harshness of absolute power and reprehensible abuse."10 11 Following the Revolutions of 1848, the revolutionary government in 12 Hungary denied any political rights to Serbs who lived in the southern parts of 13 the realm.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Student Movements: 1968, 1981 and 1997 the Impact Of
    Student Movements: 1968, 1981 and 1997 The impact of students in mobilizing society to chant for the Republic of Kosovo Atdhe Hetemi Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of East European Languages and Cultures Supervisor Prof. dr. Rozita Dimova Department of East European Languages and Cultures Dean Prof. dr. Gita Deneckere Rector Prof. dr. Rik Van de Walle October 2019 i English Summary This dissertation examines the motives and central visions of three student demonstrations, each taking place within different historical and political contexts and each organized by a different generation of Kosovo Albanian students. The years 1968, 1981 and 1997 witnessed a proliferation of student mobilizations as collective responses demanding more national rights for Albanians in Kosovo. I argue that the students' main vision in all three movements was the political independence of Kosovo. Given the complexity of the students' goal, my analysis focuses on the influence and reactions of domestic and foreign powers vis-à-vis the University of Prishtina (hereafter UP), the students and their movements. Fueled by their desire for freedom from Serbian hegemony, the students played a central role in "preserving" and passing from one generation to the next the vision of "Republic" status for Kosovo. Kosova Republikë or the Republic of Kosovo (hereafter RK) status was a demand of all three student demonstrations, but the students' impact on state creation has generally been underestimated by politicians and public figures. Thus, the primary purpose of this study is to unearth the various and hitherto unknown or hidden roles of higher education – then the UP – and its students in shaping Kosovo's recent history.
    [Show full text]
  • DONALD NICOL Donald Macgillivray Nicol 1923–2003
    DONALD NICOL Donald MacGillivray Nicol 1923–2003 DONALD MACGILLIVRAY NICOL was born in Portsmouth on 4 February 1923, the son of a Scottish Presbyterian minister. He was always proud of his MacGillivray antecedents (on his mother’s side) and of his family’s connection with Culloden, the site of the Jacobite defeat in 1745, on whose correct pronunciation he would always insist. Despite attending school first in Sheffield and then in London, he retained a slight Scottish accent throughout his life. By the time he left St Paul’s School, already an able classical scholar, it was 1941; the rest of his education would have to wait until after the war. Donald’s letters, which he carefully preserved and ordered with the instinct of an archivist, provide details of the war years.1 In 1942, at the age of nineteen, he was teaching elementary maths, Latin and French to the junior forms at St-Anne’s-on-Sea, Lancashire. He commented to his father that he would be dismissed were it known that he was a conscientious objector. By November of that year he had entered a Friends’ Ambulance 1 The bulk of his letters are to his father (1942–6) and to his future wife (1949–50). Also preserved are the letters of his supervisor, Sir Steven Runciman, over a forty-year period. Other papers are his diaries, for a short period of time in 1944, his notebooks with drawings and plans of churches he studied in Epiros, and his account of his travels on Mount Athos. This material is now in the King’s College London Archives, by courtesy of the Nicol family.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online
    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Conditions in the Kingdom of Serbia (1884-1914)
    Monetary Conditions in the Kingdom of Serbia (1884-1914) Branko Hinić, National Bank of Serbia Milan Šojić, National Bank of Serbia Ljiljana Đurđević, National Bank of Serbia Abstract: From 1884 to 1914, the Privileged National Bank of the Kingdom of Serbia managed to establish and maintain relatively stable monetary conditions. On the one hand, its interest rates and lending policy contributed to the lowering and stabilization of exceptionally high market interest rates, and on the other, the National Bank managed to preserve relative stability of the domestic currency. The conversion of paper money to gold or silver was ensured at all times, except in two instances – at the outbreak of the Balkan Wars and World War I. The National Bank could not eliminate agio, but did the best it could to ease its fluctuations. Agio declined as a result of a sharp turnabout in public finances never again to reach the level prior to 1903. The effectiveness of the National Bank in achieving relatively stable monetary conditions is particularly important in light of the circumstances prevailing at the time: wars and economic crises, budget deficits and internal political upheavals. It would be right to say that monetary conditions were largely shaped by the state of public finances. As budget expenditures outstripped the revenues, the government was forced to look for additional funds to cover the deficit by borrowing either abroad or locally, primarily from the National Bank. This had a direct negative effect on the level of gold reserves and indirectly affected the stability of the domestic currency and Bank lending activity.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of BELGRADE FACULTY of POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional Master's Program in Peace Studies MASTER's THESIS Revisiting T
    UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional Master’s Program in Peace Studies MASTER’S THESIS Revisiting the Orange Revolution and Euromaidan: Pro-Democracy Civil Disobedience in Ukraine Academic supervisor: Student: Associate Professor Marko Simendić Olga Vasilevich 9/18 Belgrade, 2020 1 Content Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………3 1. Theoretical section……………………………………………………………………………..9 1.1 Civil disobedience…………………………………………………………………………9 1.2 Civil society……………………………………………………………………………... 19 1.3 Nonviolence……………………………………………………………………………... 24 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………… 31 2. Analytical section……………………………………………………………………………..33 2.1 The framework for disobedience………………………………………………….…….. 33 2.2 Orange Revolution………………………………………………………………………. 40 2.3 Euromaidan……………………………………………………………………………… 47 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………… 59 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………… 62 References……………………………………………………………………………………….67 2 INTRODUCTION The Orange Revolution and the Revolution of Dignity have precipitated the ongoing Ukraine crisis. According to the United Nations Rights Office, the latter has claimed the lives of 13,000 people, including those of unarmed civilian population, and entailed 30,000 wounded (Miller 2019). The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees adds to that 1.5 million internally displaced persons (IDPs), 100,000 refugees and asylum-seekers (UNHCR 2014). The armed conflict is of continued relevance to Russia, Europe, as well as the United States. During the first 10 months,
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • JULIAN ALPS TRIGLAV NATIONAL PARK 2The Julian Alps
    1 JULIAN ALPS TRIGLAV NATIONAL PARK www.slovenia.info 2The Julian Alps The Julian Alps are the southeast- ernmost part of the Alpine arc and at the same time the mountain range that marks the border between Slo- venia and Italy. They are usually divided into the East- ern and Western Julian Alps. The East- ern Julian Alps, which make up approx- imately three-quarters of the range and cover an area of 1,542 km2, lie entirely on the Slovenian side of the border and are the largest and highest Alpine range in Slovenia. The highest peak is Triglav (2,864 metres), but there are more than 150 other peaks over 2,000 metres high. The emerald river Soča rises on one side of the Julian Alps, in the Primorska re- gion; the two headwaters of the river Sava – the Sava Dolinka and the Sava Bohinjka – rise on the other side, in the Gorenjska region. The Julian Alps – the kingdom of Zlatorog According to an ancient legend a white chamois with golden horns lived in the mountains. The people of the area named him Zlatorog, or “Goldhorn”. He guarded the treasures of nature. One day a greedy hunter set off into the mountains and, ignoring the warnings, tracked down Zlatorog and shot him. Blood ran from his wounds Chamois The Triglav rose and fell to the ground. Where it landed, a miraculous plant, the Triglav rose, sprang up. Zlatorog ate the flowers of this plant and its magical healing powers made him invulnerable. At the same time, however, he was saddened by the greed of human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • (1389) and the Munich Agreement (1938) As Political Myths
    Department of Political and Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Helsinki The Battle Backwards A Comparative Study of the Battle of Kosovo Polje (1389) and the Munich Agreement (1938) as Political Myths Brendan Humphreys ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Helsinki, for public examination in hall XII, University main building, Fabianinkatu 33, on 13 December 2013, at noon. Helsinki 2013 Publications of the Department of Political and Economic Studies 12 (2013) Political History © Brendan Humphreys Cover: Riikka Hyypiä Distribution and Sales: Unigrafia Bookstore http://kirjakauppa.unigrafia.fi/ [email protected] PL 4 (Vuorikatu 3 A) 00014 Helsingin yliopisto ISSN-L 2243-3635 ISSN 2243-3635 (Print) ISSN 2243-3643 (Online) ISBN 978-952-10-9084-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-952-10-9085-1 (PDF) Unigrafia, Helsinki 2013 We continue the battle We continue it backwards Vasko Popa, Worriors of the Field of the Blackbird A whole volume could well be written on the myths of modern man, on the mythologies camouflaged in the plays that he enjoys, in the books that he reads. The cinema, that “dream factory” takes over and employs countless mythical motifs – the fight between hero and monster, initiatory combats and ordeals, paradigmatic figures and images (the maiden, the hero, the paradisiacal landscape, hell and do on). Even reading includes a mythological function, only because it replaces the recitation of myths in archaic societies and the oral literature that still lives in the rural communities of Europe, but particularly because, through reading, the modern man succeeds in obtaining an ‘escape from time’ comparable to the ‘emergence from time’ effected by myths.
    [Show full text]
  • Nations and Citizens in Yugoslavia and the Post-Yugoslav States: One Hundred Years of Citizenship
    Štiks, Igor. "Brothers United: The Making of Yugoslavs." Nations and Citizens in Yugoslavia and the Post-Yugoslav States: One Hundred Years of Citizenship. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015. 25–36. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 26 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474221559.ch-002>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 26 September 2021, 07:06 UTC. Copyright © Igor Štiks 2015. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 1 Brothers United: The Making of Yugoslavs The revolver came from Serbia, but the finger that pulled the trigger that would kill Franz Ferdinand and thus announce the end of one world and the birth of another acted upon two strong beliefs. If one can judge from his statement, underage Gavrilo Princip, like so many of his peers, was foremost convinced that South Slavs should be liberated from a foreign yoke and unite in their own state; this belief was strongly though not articulately mixed with another conviction that the world about to come must be the world of profound social transformation. Two motives with which our story of ‘one hundred years of citizenship’ begins will be repeated in many different forms during this century: should South Slavs have their own common state? Or form separate ones? And, regardless of the answer, should political transformations entail more social equality or only a change of the rulers at the top of the existing hierarchy? Every idea often has deep roots and various historic materializations.
    [Show full text]
  • Triglav Group
    Triglav Group Audited consolidated annual report for the year ended at December MANAGEMENT BOARD: President: Members: Ljubljana, "# March "&' WorldReginfo - 8fab634d-bd99-4b97-a352-e98eb0bd996d ZAVAROVALNICA TRIGLAV D.D. HEADQUARTERS MIKLOŠIČEVA CESTA , LJUBLJANA MANAGEMENT REPORT OF THE TRIGLAV GOUP FOR Ljubljana, . March # WorldReginfo - 8fab634d-bd99-4b97-a352-e98eb0bd996d MANAGEMENT REPORT OF THE TRIGLAV GROUP FOR CONTENTS: . THE TRIGLAV GROUP IN ...................................................................................................................... # . STRATEGY AND PLANES OF THE TRIGLAV GROUP ................................................................................... #. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT .................................................................................................. ' (. SHARE CAPITAL AND SHAREHOLDERS OF ZAVAROVALNICA TRIGLAV .................................................. ). DEVELOPMENT AND SALES ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................................... #' '. PERFORMANCE OF THE TRIGLAV GROUP ................................................................................................. (' *. FINANCIAL RESULT OF THE TRIGLAV GROUP IN ............................................................................. '' +. FINANCIAL STANDING OF THE TRIGLAV GROUP IN ........................................................................ ' . CASH FLOW STATEMENT ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution and the Origins of Human Rights
    2/11/2016 The French Revolution and the Origins of Human Rights So many revolutions, so little time … • The Greek War of Independence, 1821‐1829 • Irish Rebellion of 1641 • Decembrist Revolt (Russia, 1825) • First Russian Revolution, 1905 • English Revolution, 1642‐1660 • Albanian Revolution (Ottoman, 1910) • The Naples Revolt, 1647 • July Revolution (France, 1830) • Easter Rising In Dublin, 1916 • The Khmelnytsky Uprising, 1648 • Belgian Revolution, 1830 • Irish War of Independence (1916‐1923) • February Revolution (Russia, 1917) • The Fronde (France, 1648‐1653) • November Uprising (Poland, 1830‐1831) • October Revolution (a.k.a. Bolshevik) , • Moscow Uprising of Streltsy Regiments, 1688 • The Bosnian Uprising (Ottoman, 1831‐1832) 1917 • The Glorious Revolution (England, 1688) • Ukrainian Revolution, 1917‐1921 • June Rebellion (France, 1832) • Finnish Civil War, 1918 • The Streltsy Uprising (Russia, 1698) • Revolutions of 1848‐1849 (Italian, German, Danish • German Revolution, 1918 • The Camisard Rebellion (France, 1702‐1715) States; Hungarian; Ireland; Wallachia; Moldavia • The Rakoczi Uprising (Habsburg Empire, 1703‐1711) • Herzegovinia Uprising (Ottoman, 1852‐1862) • The First Jacobite Rebellion (England, 1715) • • The Fourth Dalecarlian Rebellion (Sweden, 1743) Second Italian War for Independence (1859) • Jacobite Rising (Scotland, 1745‐1746) • January Uprising/Polish Uprising (Russia, 1863‐ 1865) • Pugachev Rebellion (Russia, 1773‐1775) • • The French Revolution, 1789‐1799 The Fenian Rising (Ireland, 1867) • Saxon Peasants’ Revolut,
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Document: the FURTHEST
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: THE FURTHEST WATCH OF THE REICH: NATIONAL SOCIALISM, ETHNIC GERMANS, AND THE OCCUPATION OF THE SERBIAN BANAT, 1941-1944 Mirna Zakic, Ph.D., 2011 Directed by: Professor Jeffrey Herf, Department of History This dissertation examines the Volksdeutsche (ethnic Germans) of the Serbian Banat (northeastern Serbia) during World War II, with a focus on their collaboration with the invading Germans from the Third Reich, and their participation in the occupation of their home region. It focuses on the occupation period (April 1941-October 1944) so as to illuminate three major themes: the mutual perceptions held by ethnic and Reich Germans and how these shaped policy; the motivation behind ethnic German collaboration; and the events which drew ethnic Germans ever deeper into complicity with the Third Reich. The Banat ethnic Germans profited from a fortuitous meeting of diplomatic, military, ideological and economic reasons, which prompted the Third Reich to occupy their home region in April 1941. They played a leading role in the administration and policing of the Serbian Banat until October 1944, when the Red Army invaded the Banat. The ethnic Germans collaborated with the Nazi regime in many ways: they accepted its worldview as their own, supplied it with food, administrative services and eventually soldiers. They acted as enforcers and executors of its policies, which benefited them as perceived racial and ideological kin to Reich Germans. These policies did so at the expense of the multiethnic Banat‟s other residents, especially Jews and Serbs. In this, the Third Reich replicated general policy guidelines already implemented inside Germany and elsewhere in German-occupied Europe.
    [Show full text]