DOCSLIB.ORG

990-Pf, Part Iv John S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Return of Private Foundation OMB No. 1545-0052 Form 990-PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation Department of the Treasury | Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. 2014 Internal Revenue Service | Information about Form 990-PF and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990pf. Open to Public Inspection For calendar year 2014 or tax year beginning , and ending Name of foundation A Employer identification number JOHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION 65-0464177 Number and street (or P.O. box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BLVD, #3300 305-908-2600 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending, check here~| MIAMI, FL 33131-2349 G Check all that apply: Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here ~~| Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, Address change Name change check here and attach computation ~~~~| H Check type of organization: X Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here ~| I Fair market value of all assets at end of year J Accounting method: Cash X Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination (from Part II, col. (c), line 16) Other (specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here ~| | $ 2,285,572,378. (Part I, column (d) must be on cash basis.) Part I Analysis of Revenue and Expenses (a) Revenue and (b) Net investment (c) Adjusted net (d) Disbursements (The total of amounts in columns (b), (c), and (d) may not for charitable purposes necessarily equal the amounts in column (a).) expenses per books income income (cash basis only) 1 Contributions, gifts, grants, etc., received ~~~ 250,000. N/A 2 Check | if the foundation is not required to attach Sch. B Interest on savings and temporary 3 cash investments ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4 Dividends and interest from securities~~~~~ 24,164,189. 43,347,459. 5a Gross rents ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ b Net rental income or (loss) 6a Net gain or (loss) from sale of assets not on line 10 ~~ 158,236,934. STATEMENT1 Gross sales price for all b assets on line 6a ~~ 687,804,930. 7 Capital gain net income (from Part IV, line 2) ~~~~~ 148,674,799. Revenue 8 Net short-term capital gain ~~~~~~~~~ 9 Income modifications~~~~~~~~~~~~ Gross sales less returns 10a and allowances ~~~~ b Less: Cost of goods sold ~ c Gross profit or (loss) ~~~~~~~~~~~~ 11 Other income ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 30,842. -1,106,962. STATEMENT2 12 Total. Add lines 1 through 11 182,681,965. 190,915,296. 13 Compensation of officers, directors, trustees, etc.~~~ 3,206,641. 77,609. 3,117,140. 14 Other employee salaries and wages~~~~~~ 3,624,487. 487,068. 3,052,366. 15 Pension plans, employee benefits ~~~~~~ 4,254,612. 273,139. 1,985,486. 16a Legal fees~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~STMT 3 597,428. 229,483. 332,785. b Accounting fees ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~STMT 4 234,958. 190,081. 15,752. c Other professional fees ~~~~~~~~~~~STMT 5 6,881,629. 4,819,520. 1,323,635. 17 Interest ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 18 Taxes~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~STMT 6 2,336,682. 1,265,312. 0. 19 Depreciation and depletion ~~~~~~~~~ 20 Occupancy ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1,106,166. 66,344. 1,029,656. 21 Travel, conferences, and meetings ~~~~~~ 1,500,960. 134,121. 1,346,289. 22 Printing and publications ~~~~~~~~~~ 36,550. 2,035. 34,203. 23 Other expenses ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~STMT 7 14,850,142. 1,586,187. 12,523,506. 24 Total operating and administrative expenses. Add lines 13 through 23 ~~~~~ 38,630,255. 9,130,899. 24,760,818. Operating and Administrative Expenses 25 Contributions, gifts, grants paid ~~~~~~~ 138,793,800. 115,976,297. 26 Total expenses and disbursements. Add lines 24 and 25 177,424,055. 9,130,899. 140,737,115. 27 Subtract line 26 from line 12: a Excess of revenue over expenses and disbursements ~ 5,257,910. b Net investment income (if negative, enter -0-)~~~ 181,784,397. c Adjusted net income (if negative, enter -0-) N/A 423501 11-24-14 LHA For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see instructions. Form 990-PF (2014) Form 990-PF (2014) JOHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION 65-0464177 Page 2 Beginning of year End of year Part II Balance Sheets Attached schedules and amounts in the description column should be for end-of-year amounts only. (a) Book Value (b) Book Value (c) Fair Market Value 1 Cash - non-interest-bearing ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 Savings and temporary cash investments ~~~~~~~~~~~~ 26,006,335. 63,646,210. 63,646,210. 3 Accounts receivable 9 Less: allowance for doubtful accounts 9 4 Pledges receivable 9 Less: allowance for doubtful accounts 9 5 Grants receivable ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 6 Receivables due from officers, directors, trustees, and other disqualified persons ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 7 Other notes and loans receivable ~~~~~~~~9 Less: allowance for doubtful accounts 9 8 Inventories for sale or use ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 9 Prepaid expenses and deferred charges ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Assets 10a Investments - U.S. and state government obligations ~~~~~~~STMT 8 50,388,440. 97,940,662. 97,940,662. b Investments - corporate stock ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~STMT 9 807,880,536. 755,018,339. 755,018,339. c Investments - corporate bonds ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~STMT 10 204,568,004. 158,915,400. 158,915,400. 11 Investments - land, buildings, and equipment: basis ~~9 Less: accumulated depreciation ~~~~~~~~9 12 Investments - mortgage loans ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 13 Investments - other ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~STMT 11 1,167,850,252. 1,197,706,869. 1,197,706,869. 14 Land, buildings, and equipment: basis 9 Less: accumulated depreciation ~~~~~~~~9 15 Other assets (describe 9 STATEMENT12 ) 29,407,583. 12,344,898. 12,344,898. 16 Total assets (to be completed by all filers - see the instructions. Also, see page 1, item I) 2,286,101,150. 2,285,572,378. 2,285,572,378. 17 Accounts payable and accrued expenses ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 18 Grants payable ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 102,876,246. 126,107,818. 19 Deferred revenue ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 20 Loans from officers, directors, trustees, and other disqualified persons ~~~~ 21 Mortgages and other notes payable ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Liabilities 22 Other liabilities (describe 9 STATEMENT13 ) 3,212,031. 7,574,773. 23 Total liabilities (add lines 17 through 22) 106,088,277. 133,682,591. Foundations that follow SFAS 117, check here ~~~~ 9 X and complete lines 24 through 26 and lines 30 and 31. 24 Unrestricted ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2,180,012,873. 2,151,889,787. 25 Temporarily restricted ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 26 Permanently restricted~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Foundations that do not follow SFAS 117, check here 9 and complete lines 27 through 31. 27 Capital stock, trust principal, or current funds ~~~~~~~~~~~ 28 Paid-in or capital surplus, or land, bldg., and equipment fund ~~~~ 29 Retained earnings, accumulated income, endowment, or other funds~ 30 Total net assets or fund balances~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2,180,012,873. 2,151,889,787. Net Assets or Fund Balances 31 Total liabilities and net assets/fund balances 2,286,101,150. 2,285,572,378. Part III Analysis of Changes in Net Assets or Fund Balances 1 Total net assets or fund balances at beginning of year - Part II, column (a), line 30 (must agree with end-of-year figure reported on prior year's return) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 2,180,012,873. 2 Enter amount from Part I, line 27a ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 5,257,910. 3 Other increases not included in line 2 (itemize) 9 3 0. 4 Add lines 1, 2, and 3 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4 2,185,270,783. 5 Decreases not included in line 2 (itemize) 9 UNREALIZED LOSS ON INVESTMENTS 5 33,380,996. 6 Total net assets or fund balances at end of year (line 4 minus line 5) - Part II, column (b), line 30 6 2,151,889,787. Form 990-PF (2014) 423511 11-24-14 Form 990-PF (2014) JOHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION 65-0464177 Page 3 Part IV Capital Gains and Losses for Tax on Investment Income (a) List and describe the kind(s) of property sold (e.g., real estate, (b) How acquired (c) Date acquired (d) Date sold P - Purchase 2-story brick warehouse; or common stock, 200 shs. MLC Co.) D - Donation (mo., day, yr.) (mo., day, yr.) 1a b SEE ATTACHED STATEMENTS c d e (e) Gross sales price (f) Depreciation allowed (g) Cost or other basis (h) Gain or (loss) (or allowable) plus expense of sale (e) plus (f) minus (g) a b c d e 687,804,930. 539,130,131. 148,674,799. Complete only for assets showing gain in column (h) and owned by the foundation on 12/31/69 (l) Gains (Col. (h) gain minus (j) Adjusted basis (k) Excess of col. (i) col. (k), but not less than -0-) or Losses (from col. (h)) (i) F.M.V. as of 12/31/69 as of 12/31/69 over col. (j), if any a b c d e 148,674,799. rIf gain, also enter in Part I, line 7 p 2 Capital gain net income or (net capital loss) sqIf (loss), enter -0- in Part I, line 7 ~~~~~~ om 2 148,674,799. 3 Net short-term capital gain or (loss) as defined in sections 1222(5) and (6): If gain, also enter in Part I, line 8, column (c). p If (loss), enter -0- in Part I, line 8 om 3 N/A Part V Qualification Under Section 4940(e) for Reduced Tax on Net Investment Income (For optional use by domestic private foundations subject to the section 4940(a) tax on net investment income.) If section 4940(d)(2) applies, leave this part blank.
Recommended publications
  • J Ohn S. and J Ames L. K Night F Oundation

    J Ohn S. and J Ames L. K Night F Oundation

    A NNUAL REPORT 1999 T HE FIRST FIFTY YEARS J OHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION he John S. and James L. Kn i ght Fo u n d a ti on was estab- TA B L E O F CO N T E N T S l i s h ed in 1950 as a priva te fo u n d a ti on indepen d en t Tof the Kn i g ht bro t h ers’ n e ws p a per en terpri s e s . It is C h a i r m a n’s Letter 2 ded i c a ted to f urt h ering their ideals of s ervi ce to com mu n i ty, to the highest standards of j o u r n a l i s t ic excell en ce and to the Pr e s i d e n t ’s Message 4 defense of a free pre s s . In both their publishing and ph i l a n t h ropic undert a k i n g s , History 5 the Kn i ght bro t h ers shared a broad vi s i on and uncom m on devo ti on to the com m on wel f a re . It is those ide a l s , as well as Philanthropy Takes Root 6 t h eir ph i l a n t h ropic intere s t s , to wh i ch the Fo u n d a ti on rem a i n s The First Fifty Years 8 f a i t h f u l .
  • D12.4.3 Report on Campus Party Events

    D12.4.3 Report on Campus Party Events

    Private Public Partnership Project (PPP) Large-scale Integrated Project (IP) D12.4.3: Report on Campus Party Events (FIWARE Activities/Actions) Project acronym: FIWARE Project full title: Future Internet Core Platform Contract No.: 285248 Strategic Objective: FI.ICT-2011.1.7 Technology foundation: Future Internet Core Platform Project Document Number: ICT-2011-FI-285248-WP12-D12.4.3 Project Document Date: 2014-09-29 Deliverable Type and Security: PU Author: FIWARE Consortium Contributors: FIWARE Consortium Future Internet Core Platform 1.1 Executive Summary This report is part of the dissemination tasks, as framed in the Communication, Collaboration and Dissemination activities of the FIWARE project. As part of the dissemination actions proposed by the partners selected during FIWARE’s third call for new partners, the project was going to be actively introduced at various Campus Party events between 2013 and 2014. Periodic reports have been published after these events. More specifically – and also depending on the own Campus Party dates: • The first report was delivered in October 2013, about the Campus Party Europe in London (held during September 2013). • The second report was delivered at the end of February 2014, including the project’s activities during the Campus Party Brazil in Sao Paulo (held between January and February 2014) • This final one, partially due to the postponement of Campus Party Europe to 2015 (after the project’s lifespan) and partially to the own interest of the FIWARE project in deploying and properly promoting the Mexican node of the FIWARE Lab, includes all the activities that took place in the Campus Party Mexico (CPMX5) in Zapopan, state of Jalisco, by the end of June 2014.
  • Undergraduate Thesis Paper

    Undergraduate Thesis Paper

    An Analysis of the Level of Concern Displayed Among the Malone University Undergraduate Student Body in Regards to their Online Personal Information Security Scott Markle Malone University; HON 496 December 1st, 2020 Advisor: Dr. Kyle Calderhead, Ph.D Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation from the Malone University Honors Program 0 Analysis of Online Personal Information Security Abstract The 21st century is one that is dominated by rapid technological advancements. Increased utilization of these technological betterments have created a multitude of security vulnerabilities. In this thesis, I assess the level of concern displayed among the undergraduate student population of Malone University, located in Canton, Ohio, in regards to the vulnerability of their personal online information. Nine questions, with focuses in cybersecurity scenarios, defense strategies, and threat response, were asked of participants in an online survey. From the quantitative results of these questions, trends were interpreted and conclusions drawn. Keywords: cybersecurity, Malone University, technology, vulnerabilities, cyberpsychology, information, students, college, concern, Likert scale 1 Analysis of Online Personal Information Security Acknowledgements My dearest thanks to my thesis advisor, Dr. Kyle Calderhead, Ph.D., for all of the insight, advice, and knowledge he provided me with over the course of this long endeavor, as well as during my time at Malone University as a whole. My additional thanks to Prof. Ann Lawson, M.B.A., and Dr. Jim Glasgow, Ph.D., for being wonderful members of my thesis committee. Your wisdom and eXpertise in your respective fields helped add so much depth to this research. My additional thanks to Julia Karmie and James Kontur, two of my dear friends from high school, who began their thesis eXperiences with me at Malone at the same time.
  • A Whole New Meaning to “Campus Going Green”

    A Whole New Meaning to “Campus Going Green”

    STUDENT RUNS FOR MAYOR NEWS Page 3 (lie— ANGELA DAVIS ON CAMPUS NEWS Page 3 MAIN STREET UPDATE l i l \ I NEWS Page 5 The University of Delaware’s Independent Student Newspaper Since GH ® @udrevie\U TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 VOLUME 145, ISSUE 16 A whole new meaning to COLLEGE UNCOVERED A pristine facade: “Campus Going Green” behind one student KRISTINE CASTORIA as well," said Andrew, a junior, leader’s battle with Staff Reporter from California, who requested pressure, mental illness that his last name not be used. br an international student, "It is actually beneficial to most and self-medication moving onto campus students for the high anxiety and KATHERINE NAILS freshman year can be quite the stress levels of college." Managing News Editor Fculture shock. Farah, a junior, who According to the Drug requested that her last name not Enforcement Agency study he field of geology examines be used, noticed how normalized "Preventing Marijuana Use more than just chunks marijuana is in the United States Among Youth and Young Adults," of rock— it zeroes in on and how different the views are "One in every 22 college students T Earth's physical architecture and compared to her home country of use marijuana daily, or near daily. the processes that make up Saudi Arabia. Almost 38% of college students its complex, corporeal system. "I would not want to live said they use marijuana in 2015 One of the most fundamental in the Christiana Towers," said as compared to 30% in 2003." geological concepts that affects Farah. "It would really bother me First State Compassion these mechanisms is the certainty because I'm the outsider and like Center was the first dispensary that, beneath the seemingly 90 percent of those students who to open their doors in 2015 in solid ground, seas of boiling, live there do it, and peer pressure Wilmington.
  • OVER the HUMP Is Your Guide to All Things Conn

    OVER the HUMP Is Your Guide to All Things Conn

    WHAT’S Your Guide To Conn | 4 The Lingo | 6 INSIDE Your Key To Camel Life | 14 So Much To Do | 18 Explore The Region | 20 The Camel Ways | 26 What To Eat On Campus | 30 What To Eat Off Campus | 34 Who You Gonna Call? | 38 Staying Safe | 42 Insider Map | Inside Back Cover Contents Your Guide To Conn | 4 The Lingo | 6 Your Key To Camel Life | 14 So Much To Do | 18 Explore The Region | 20 The Camel Ways | 26 What To Eat On Campus | 30 What To Eat Off Campus | 34 Who You Gonna Call? | 38 Staying Safe | 42 Insider Map | Inside Back Cover YOUR GUIDE TO CONN WELCOME, CAMELS! OVER THE HUMP is your guide to all things Conn. In the following pages, you’ll find suggestions for items to bring to campus, places to eat, things to do and a whole lot more. You’ll also learn the lingo, so you’ll know what people mean when they say, “Hey! After my ConnCourse, I’m going to hit up Blue Camel and meet my PICA friends in the Arbo.” From your Camel Moment to the last time you ring the gong, you’ll discover new YOUR things about Conn every day. Over the Hump just gives you a head start. And to stay ahead of the game, here are a few important things to do: LOG INTO YOUR CONN EMAIL ACCOUNT. Check your conncoll.edu account regularly for information you need to know, even before you arrive on campus. If you have trouble logging in, contact the IT Service Desk at 860-439-4357.
  • Security & Privacy for Mobile Phones

    Security & Privacy for Mobile Phones

    Security & Privacy FOR Mobile Phones Carybé, Lucas Helfstein July 4, 2017 Instituto DE Matemática E Estatística - USP What IS security? • That GRANTS THE INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE THE ASSURANCES above; • That ENSURES THAT EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN THIS SYSTEM KNOWS EACH other; • That TRIES TO KEEP THE ABOVE PROMISES forever. Security IS ... A System! • That ASSURES YOU THE INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF AN INFORMATION AS WELL AS ITS authors; 1 • That ENSURES THAT EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN THIS SYSTEM KNOWS EACH other; • That TRIES TO KEEP THE ABOVE PROMISES forever. Security IS ... A System! • That ASSURES YOU THE INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF AN INFORMATION AS WELL AS ITS authors; • That GRANTS THE INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE THE ASSURANCES above; 1 • That TRIES TO KEEP THE ABOVE PROMISES forever. Security IS ... A System! • That ASSURES YOU THE INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF AN INFORMATION AS WELL AS ITS authors; • That GRANTS THE INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE THE ASSURANCES above; • That ENSURES THAT EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN THIS SYSTEM KNOWS EACH other; 1 Security IS ... A System! • That ASSURES YOU THE INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF AN INFORMATION AS WELL AS ITS authors; • That GRANTS THE INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE THE ASSURANCES above; • That ENSURES THAT EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN THIS SYSTEM KNOWS EACH other; • That TRIES TO KEEP THE ABOVE PROMISES forever. 1 Security IS ... A System! Eve | | | Alice "Hi" <---------------> "Hi" Bob 2 Security IS ... Cryptography! Eve | | | Alice "Hi" <----"*****"------> "Hi" Bob 3 Security IS ... Impossible! The ONLY TRULY SECURE SYSTEM IS ONE THAT IS POWERED off, CAST IN A BLOCK OF CONCRETE AND SEALED IN A lead-lined ROOM WITH ARMED GUARDS - AND EVEN THEN I HAVE MY doubts.
  • European Office of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

    European Office of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

    EuropeanEuropean OfficeOffice ofof thethe SpanishSpanish MinistryMinistry ofof ScienceScience andand InnovationInnovation Evelina Santa Coordinator – EO Brussels Content • The European Office: structure and activities • The Spanish Presidency events in 2010 in the area of research and innovation Organisation chart of the DG for InternationalNueva organizaciónCooperation, MICINN DG International Cooperation Unit for Unit for Unit for installations Unit for Unit for Plan. European European International and institutional of Resaerch Office Programmes Programmes international relations Infrastructures organisms Structure of the European Office Directorate General European Office Spanish Presidency Communication European Office FP7 Administration 2010 Dissemination Brussels Webportal For stakeholders in For persons interested in the FP European research policy www.oemicinn.es The European Office in Brussels Staff: Evelina Santa, coordinator [email protected] Ignacio Baanante [email protected] Edgar Moya [email protected] The European Office in Brussels 1. The Spanish EU Presidency 2010: – Support to the PermRep in the preparation of the contents and the COMP council meetings – Organisation of events during the presidency: contact to EC, proposals – Organisation of seminars in Brussels to introduce the Spanish presidency priorities – Networking with relevant stakeholders: EC, Swedish presidency, trio representatives 2. Antenna – Monitoring European research policy – Informing the DG in MICINN on latest developments in Brussels through contact with the EC and stakeholders – Drafting of policy papers The European Office in Brussels 3. Support in FP7 – Participation in FP7 Infodays and seminars organised by different stakeholders (e.g. IGLO) – Technical support to FP7 agents of the MICINN: preparation of background documents, organisation of meetings with EC, provision of relevant information – Maintenance of contact to Spanish regional offices in Brussels 4.
  • OBSERVER: Copernicus Relays Bringing Space Closer to People – the Case of Argentina

    OBSERVER: Copernicus Relays Bringing Space Closer to People – the Case of Argentina

    OBSERVER: Copernicus Relays bringing space closer to people – the case of Argentina 1 / 7 Enthusiasm, entrepreneurship & space are in Space Latam’s focus. Credit: Space Latam It is indisputable that international cooperation is an essential condition for reaching global wellbeing objectives such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). International cooperation is also of the utmost importance to the Copernicus programme. With the network of Copernicus free and open data users spanning the globe, the programme is an important contributor to SDGs and economies worldwide. Space Latam, an Argentinian representative of the Copernicus Relays, is an excellent example of how the global community benefits from Copernicus and its networks. As part of the Space Strategy for Europe, the European Commission established a network of Copernicus ambassadors: the Copernicus Relays. These act as local champions, coordinating and promoting activities related to the Copernicus programme, bringing benefits and opportunities for 2 / 7 people, businesses, start-ups, researchers and governments. Space Latam, the Copernicus Relay in Argentina, was one of the earliest organisations to enter the Copernicus Relay network. The organisation submitted their application to join the network in 2016, just months after the official launch of the Copernicus Relay and Copernicus Academy networks in Brussels. When applying, José Bosleman Medina, the Director of the Argentinian Copernicus Relay- to-be, modestly mentioned that Space Latam people are volunteers with almost no budget available to finance their activities, but reassured the reviewers that he had a fantastic, hard-working team with great potential, energy and network. Space Latam far exceeded expectations and now has a large team of young experts who provide support to Argentinian start-ups and SMEs in the space sector through mentoring, hackathons, workshops and other initiatives.
  • Knight Foundation Supports Positive Youth Development

    Knight Foundation Supports Positive Youth Development

    John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Writing the Story of Transformation Knight Foundation Supports Positive Youth Development Author Wellsys Corporation December 1, 2006 Commissioned by Julie E. Tarr, Ph.D., Director of Evaluation, [email protected] John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Abstract Knight Foundation funded 39 grants in eight communities that focused on positive outcomes for youth. To aid understanding of these grants for future decision-making, Knight Foundation engaged Wellsys Corporation to conduct this assessment for the period 2005-2007. Programs that had the greatest success and possibility for sustainability were connected to many community partners, offering joint services in some cases. Communities Akron, Ohio; Bradenton, Fla.; Columbia, S.C.; Columbus, Ga.; Fort Wayne, Ind.; Macon, Ga.; Milledgeville, Ga.; Palm Beach County, Fla.; JOHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION YOUTH CLUSTER ASSESSMENT ANNUAL REPORT DECEMBER 2006 This document was prepared by Wellsys Corporation. Wellsys Corporation 3783 Presidential Parkway, Suite113 Atlanta, Georgia 30340-9998 770-455-0928 770-455-0929 (fax) 800-293-7322 www.wellsyscorp.com [email protected] Navigating directions for people and systems. John S. and James L. Knight Foundation December 1, 2006 Youth Cluster Assessment-Annual Report-Final Wellsys Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….…………...1 II. Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………...3 III. Grants and Grantees Overview…………………………………………………………….4 IV. Community Connections
  • Lanzamiento De Campus Party Argentina

    Lanzamiento De Campus Party Argentina

    Premios Eikon 2017 Categoría 1 - Campaña general TÍTULO DEL PROGRAMA Lanzamiento de Campus Party Argentina NOMBRE DE LA COMPAÑÍA O INSTITUCIÓN Campus Party Argentina DEPARTAMENTO O ÁREA QUE DESARROLLÓ EL PLAN Alurralde, Jasper & Asoc. PERSONAS RESPONSABLES DEL PLAN DE COMUNICACIÓN Karina Riera, Mariana Jasper, Paula Ruiz, Maricel Nair García Gossweiler, Rocío Sere, Romina Galindo, Consuelo Aranciaga y Micaela Martinó Un tweet que identifique y defina el propósito del programa: El campamento global de tecnología, innovación y emprendedorismo llega a la Argentina. #Soycampusero Introducción Nacido en 1997, Campus Party es el mayor festival Un Geek Camp multitudinario y activo las 24 hs: de innovación, emprendimiento, tecnología, creativi- Campus Party es un verdadero encuentro multidis- dad y entretenimiento digital del mundo. ciplinario que pone en contacto a expertos de diversas temáticas, brinda talleres prácticos de En los últimos 20 años, más de 400 mil personas han programación, hardware, diseño, robótica y música, participado de las 56 ediciones de Campus Party entre otros y ofrece retos y hacks en sitio para celebradas en más de 15 países, contando con la testear y desafiar el conocimiento y capacidad presencia de exponentes como Stephen Hawking creativa de los jóvenes participantes -denominados (físico teórico y cosmólogo británico y uno de los más “campuseros”- sobre programación, robótica, consagrados científicos de la actualidad), Steve modding, música, juegos, etc,. Otra de sus caracte- Wozniak (cofundador de Apple), Al Gore (ecologista, rísticas es que ofrece conectividad de banda ancha ex-vice-presidente estadounidense), Nicholas Negro- y contenidos las 24 horas del día durante todas las ponte (científico americano, creador del proyecto jornadas que funciona Campus Party.
  • Final Edition: Journalism According to Jack and Jim Knight

    Final Edition: Journalism According to Jack and Jim Knight

    Final Edition: Journalism According to Jack and Jim Knight John S. (Jack) and James (Jim) Knight were Akron brothers and prominent national figures, who owned and ran the Akron Beacon Journal newspaper in the 1900s. The two brothers, who inherited the Beacon Journal from their father, worked together to build up that newspaper into a strong editorial voice and business force that helped steer the city and the region. Eventually, the two parlayed the Akron paper into the flagship of a powerful, influential newspaper chain that included the Miami Herald, Detroit Free Press, San Jose Mercury News and the Philadelphia Inquirer. By 1981, the Knight-Ridder newspaper chain included 32 newspapers in 17 states, employed 15,000 workers and had a circulation of 3.6 million daily. The brothers also founded the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation (Miami), which remains one of the largest philanthropic organizations in the nation. Knight-Ridder Newspapers did not fare as well. The prize-winning newspaper group, at one time the nation's largest, was sold to the McClatchy Co. in 2006 for $4.5 billion in cash and stock. Since then, McClatchy has sold off 12 Knight-Ridder newspapers to other corporations. The Beacon Journal was sold to Black Press Ltd., a Canadian publishing company. The hour-long documentary tells the story of the Knight family, the Beacon Journal and the rise and fall of the Knight-Ridder newspaper group. The documentary was written and produced by Paul Jacoway, of Paul R. Jacoway Productions of Akron, and Kathleen Endres, distinguished professor of Communication at The University of Akron, and directed by Jacoway.
  • Messaging Apps & Communication Platforms Comparative Analysis

    Messaging Apps & Communication Platforms Comparative Analysis

    www.dka.global Messaging Apps & Communication Platforms Comparative Analysis February 2021 Table of Contents User concerns regarding privacy in messaging apps have spiked in recent years. Incidents of data breaches have alarmed many customers and forced them to reconsider their standard attitudes Introduction 3 towards messaging apps and the security of their personal information. Some situations and events have steadily Methodology of the Assessment 4 deteriorated public trust, resulting in many users wondering whether they have lost control over their own data. Messaging Apps: Score by Features 5 Users of messaging apps and platforms report concerns about Messaging Apps: Score by Security 7 businesses, advertisers and governments accessing and using their data. These growing privacy concerns have prompted Total Score 9 advocacy for tighter regulations. In addition, they have placed companies responsible for safeguarding personal data under greater scrutiny. Trade-offs between Features and Security 11 At the same time, developments in Information Technologies are Operating System, Hardware and Other Issues 13 bringing new, more sophisticated solutions for messaging and corporate communication. Corporate Communication Platforms 14 Deep Knowledge Analytics conducted its own independent analysis to identify and benchmark the most secure and Conclusions 16 convenient messaging apps.In this case study we are assessing convenience, security and accessibility of 18 popular messaging Disclaimer 17 apps. The study also features a short analysis of corporate communication platforms. Deep Knowledge Analytics 2 Introduction Messaging apps are essential for our daily activities, including business communication, personal communication, and other domains. For some specific spheres, such as journalism and protest activities, secure messaging is a central concern, of the utmost importance.