A Thesis Presented for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Amber Teacher
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
POPULATION AND IMMUNOCOMPETENT GENETIC VARIATION: A FIELD-BASED STUDY A thesis presented for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Amber Teacher School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London & Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London Submitted December 2008 1 Declaration 2 Statement of Originality I certify that this thesis, and the research to which it refers, are the product of my own work (apart from the simulations as noted in chapters 5 and 6), and that any idea or quotations from the work of other people, published or otherwise, are fully acknowledged in accordance with the standard referencing practices of the discipline. I acknowledge the helpful guidance and support of my supervisors, Dr Trenton Garner, Prof Richard Nichols and Dr Andrew Cunningham. Signed: Acknowledgements 3 Acknowledgements I would particularly like to thank Trent Garner, Richard Nichols and Andrew Cunningham for their invaluable advice and support throughout. I’m also very grateful to Seirian Sumner and Kate Ciborowski for teaching me all things lab-related before I started this work, and to Dada Gotelli for keeping the genetics lab running so smoothly. This project could not have taken place without all the pond owners who allowed access to their frog populations, nor without Jules Howard and Froglife (registered charity no.1093372) who shared records of amphibian mortalities, and the Irish Peatlands Conservation Council (registered charity no. CHY6829) who assisted with locating study populations in Ireland. Thanks to my panel members at Queen Mary, Rob Knell and Jon Grey, for reading preliminary reports and giving feedback that undoubtedly improved this work. Particular thanks to Bill Jordan for advice in the lab that made this work as rigorous as it could be. Thanks also to Andrew King for assistance with Generalised Linear Modelling, Jinliang Wang for helpful discussions on relatedness and inbreeding, to Chikako Matsuba and Juha Merilä for advice on phylogeography, and to Inga Zeisset and Shoshanna May for their experience on amphibian MHC genes. Special thanks to Dave Griffiths for constant support over the years, as well as for writing marvellous data manipulation programs, and also to Paddy O’Byrne and Michèle Bland for their ongoing support and also proof reading much of this thesis. Thanks also, of course, to the perfect office mates, Andy King and Jon Bielby – both have given ideas and opinions on parts of this thesis. Many volunteers contributed their time and enthusiasm to this project both in the lab and in the field. Particular thanks to Sayako Arai for her brilliant laboratory assistance, running plates of samples for microsatellite analysis. Thanks also to Miriam Isabel Smith for fieldwork and lab assistance, to Amanda Duffus for fieldwork assistance and for sharing disease screening results, and to Michael Williamson, Elizabeth Webber, Acknowledgements 4 Jennifer Gilbert, Deise Nishimura, Nadia Sitas, Rhiannon Lloyd and Mimi Sun for fieldwork assistance. Many thanks also to those who provided samples from their archives: Chikako Matsuba, Juha Merila, Robert Jehle, Jaime Bosch, Dirk Schmeller, Miguel Vences, Wieslaw Babik, Pim Artzen, Olga Tsinenko, Josh van Buskirk, Christophe Eggert and Benedikt Schmidt. All fieldwork in the Republic of Ireland was performed under licensing from the National Parks and Wildlife Service, and animal work in the UK was performed under UK Home Office licensing, and ethics committee approval from the Zoological Society of London. This work was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council studentship with CASE support from Herpetofauna Consultants International Ltd. and additional funding from the Zoological Society of London, the University of London Central Research Fund, the Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, the British Wildlife Health Association, and the Genetics Society. Abstract 5 Abstract of Thesis In order to establish an evolutionary context, this thesis examines the phylogeography of the common frog (Rana temporaria) throughout Europe, with a particular focus on the British Isles. Mitochondrial DNA indicates divergent, yet overlapping Eastern and Western European haplotypes, and that Britain was colonized via Western Europe, likely from an Iberian glacial refugium. Ireland appears to have been colonized both via this route, and from a refugium in the South West of Ireland. Data from nuclear microsatellite markers indicate that although the mtDNA haplotypes in England and Eastern Ireland are indistinguishable, there is vastly lower genetic diversity in Ireland. Moving to a finer scale, common frogs in Britain are examined for differences in population genetic patterns that may have been caused by disease outbreaks (Ranavirus). Populations that have experienced recurrent mortalities for approximately five generations are compared to those with no history of disease. Populations that suffer recurrent disease are shown to have experienced approximately 80% declines in the numbers of frogs ten years after the disease first arrived. Yet surprisingly, microsatellite markers show no signal of reduced genetic variability; it is possible that immigration has maintained allelic richness in infected populations. An excess of homozygosity, and a reduction of relatedness within infected ponds implies that assortative mating may be occurring, and population genetic simulations confirm that assortative mating can produce these patterns. A novel Major Histocompatibility Complex (a region directly involved in the immune response to viruses) marker was developed, and haplotype frequencies are shown to differ between infected and uninfected populations. Infected populations show reduced genetic diversity and more uniform allelic frequencies; implying directional selection for more resistant genotypes. These findings indicate that Ranavirus may be affecting the population dynamics of the common frog, and that this species appears to be adapting to the presence of the disease. Contents 6 Table of Contents Title Page .......................................................................................................................1 Statement of Originality.................................................................................................2 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................3 Abstract of Thesis ..........................................................................................................5 Table of Contents ...........................................................................................................6 List of Tables..................................................................................................................8 List of Figures ................................................................................................................9 CHAPTER 1: Introduction..................................................................................................10 CHAPTER 2: European phylogeography of the common frog (Rana temporaria), and postglacial colonisation routes into the British Isles........................................................21 Abstract ........................................................................................................................21 Introduction..................................................................................................................22 Materials and Methods.................................................................................................25 Results..........................................................................................................................28 Discussion ....................................................................................................................30 CHAPTER 3: Microsatellite analysis reveals dramatic differences in population genetic variation of the common frog (Rana temporaria) in England and Ireland......................34 Abstract ........................................................................................................................34 Introduction..................................................................................................................35 Methods........................................................................................................................36 Results..........................................................................................................................39 Discussion ....................................................................................................................43 CHAPTER 4: The impact of Ranavirus infection on common frog populations in the UK ..........................................................................................................................................46 Abstract ........................................................................................................................46 Introduction..................................................................................................................47 Methods........................................................................................................................49 Results..........................................................................................................................52 Contents 7 Discussion ....................................................................................................................56