Appendix 1: Emergency General Surgical Core Procedures* *Based on Shafi Et Al

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 1: Emergency General Surgical Core Procedures* *Based on Shafi Et Al Appendix 1: Emergency general surgical core procedures* *Based on Shafi et al. Journal of Trauma Gastrointestinal Stomach Incision, Excision 43500-43641 Laparoscopy Diagnostic 49230 Other Gastrojejunostomy 43830 Repair Perforated Gastric / Duodenal Ulcer 43840 Splenectomy, Open 38100 Splenorrhaphy 38115 Repair Paraesophageal / Diaphragmatic hernia 39502 Exploratory Laparotomy 49000 Excision Meckel’s Diverticulum 44800 Small Bowel Resection, Anastomosis 44120 Small Bowel Resection, Enterostomy 44125 Appendectomy 44950 Appendectomy, Drainage Abscess 44960 Exploratory Laparoscopy – with/without Biopsies 49321 Appendectomy, Laparoscopic 44970 Gastrotomy 43500 Gastrojejunostomy 43820 Suture Repair Bleeding Ulcer 43501 Gastric Wedge Resection 43610 Hemi-Gastrectomy with/out Vagotomy 43632, 43635 Total Gastrectomy 43621 Vagotomy and Pyloroplasty 43640 Highly Selective Vagotomy 43641 Repair Perforated Gastric / Duodenal Ulcer 43840 Enterolysis (Lysis of Adhesions) 44005 Reduction Intussusecption 44050 Inguinal – Adult 49505 Inguinal Hernia, Laparoscopic – Adult 49650 Umbilical – Adult 49585 Femoral 49550 Ventral – Incisional – Initial/Recurrent 49560, 49565 Remove Infected Abdominal Mesh 11008 Repair Paraesophageal / Diaphragmatic hernia 39502 Colectomy, Anastomosis 44140 Partial Colectomy, Colostomy (Hartmann) 44143 Creation Enterostomy (Jejunostomy or Ileostomy) 44310 Creation Colostomy 44320 Debride or Excise Perineal Infection 11004 Excision Pilonidal Cyst / Sinus 11771 Drainage Intra-Abdominal Abscess (Not Appendiceal) 49020 Repair Complex Anorectal Fistulae 46707, 46710, 46712, 46288, 46270, 46280, 46275, 45562, 45563 – 45825 Closure Rectovaginal Fistula – Perineal Approach 57300 Closure Rectovaginal Fistula – Abdominal Approach 57305 Open Transabdominal Operation for Rectal Prolapse 45540, 45541, 45550 Laparoscopic Transabdominal Operation for Rectal Prolapse 45400, 45402 Perineal Operation for Rectal Prolapse 45540, 45541, 45550 Hidradenitis Excision* 11470, 11471 Colectomy with low Anterior Resection 44145, 44146 All Laparoscopic colon procedures including: 44202, 44204, 44205, 44206, 44207, 44208, 44210, (lap assisted, hand assisted, regardless of diagnosis 44211, 44212, 44213, 44227, 45395, 45397, 45400, Ileocolectomy, TAC/Ileostomy/IRA 45402 Sigmoid/Sleeve Resection, IPAA, etc.) Partial Colectomy, Anastomosis 44140 Partial Colectomy, Colostomy (Hartmann) 44143 Total Colectomy, Anastomosis 44150 Total Abdominal Colectomy, Ileostomy 44150 Colectomy, Laparoscopic 44204 Total Proctocolectomy with Ileostomy 44155 Creation Enterostomy (Jejunostomy or Ileostomy) 44310 Creation Colostomy 44320 Revision Enterostomy 44312 Revision Colostomy 44340 Takedown Colostomy 44626 Takedown Ileostomy 44620 Abdominoperineal Resection 44147 Ileocecectomy 44160 Low Anterior Resection 44145 Repair Enterotomy 44602 Reduction Intussusecption (colo) 44050 Hepatic-Pancreatic-Biliary Drainage Hepatic Abscess / Simple Cyst 47010 Drainage Hepatic Amoebic or Echinococcal Cyst / Abscess 47015 Cholecystectomy, Open 47600 Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic 47562 Common Bile Duct Exploration 47420 Cholecystoenteric Anastomosis 47720 Choledochoenteric Anastomosis 47760 Drainage / Debride Infection 48005 Internal Drainage Pseudocyst 48520 External Drainage Pseudocyst 48510 Drainage Hepatic Abscess / Simple Cyst 47010 Drainage Hepatic Amoebic or Echinococcal Cyst / Abscess 47015 Common Bile Duct Exploration 47420 Cholecystoenteric Anastomosis 47720 Choledochoenteric Anastomosis 47760 Vascular Thromboembolectomy 34201 Amputation – Guillotine 27882 Upper Extremity Fasciotomy 25024 Lower Extremity Fasciotomy 27602 Excision Aneurysm, Upper Extremity 35011 Excision Aneurysm, Lower Extremity 35141 Repair Aneurysm Abdominal Aorta 35081 Endarterectomy, Aortoiliofemoral 35363 Axillo – Femoral Bypass 35521 Femoro – Femoral Bypass 35558 Femoro – Popliteal Bypass 35556 Femoro – Tibial Bypass 35566 Mesenteric Revascularization Procedures 35480 *Hidradenitis Excision was intentionally included with ``Gastrointestinal'' rather than ``Hepato-biliary-pancreatic'' or ``Vascular.'' Appendix 2: Description of tests OBS=Alive/Dead EXP=Mortprob Observed/Expected Test: Appendix 3: Definitions of emergency and elective status Below are the relevant portions of definitions of the ``Emergency'' and ``Elective'' variables taken as examples from the User Guide for the 2012 ACS-NSQIP Participant Use Data File.[12] For the variable Emergency, the emergency case variable distinguishes between urgent/semielective/elective cases and true emergent surgeries. Urgent/semi-elective cases are not considered emergencies. Assign 'YES' if the surgeon and/or anesthesiologist report the case as emergent. For the variable Elective, ``YES'' is entered if the patient is brought to the hospital or facility for a scheduled (elective) surgery from their home or normal living situation on the day that the procedure is performed. ENTER NO (Exclude) FOR the following: patients who are inpatient at an acute care hospital (example: patient transferred from another acute care hospital to your hospital for surgery) patients who are transferred from an ED patients who are transferred from a clinic patients who undergo an emergent/urgent surgical case patients admitted to the hospital on the day(s) prior to a scheduled procedure for any reason (e.g. cardiac or pulmonary workup or ``tuning'', bowel cleanout, TPN, hydration, anticoagulation reversal etc.) ENTER YES (Include) FOR the following: patients staying with friends or family, or in a local hotel, because of logistics (example: patient lives 50 miles from the hospital and stays in a hotel across from the hospital the night before their scheduled (elective) surgery) patients who come from their present ``home'' (which may include patients whose home is a nursing home, assisted care facility, prison or other nonhospital institution) .
Recommended publications
  • Laparoscopic Truncal Vagotomy and Gatrojejunostomy for Pyloric Stenosis
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE pISSN 2234-778X •eISSN 2234-5248 J Minim Invasive Surg 2015;18(2):48-52 Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery Laparoscopic Truncal Vagotomy and Gatrojejunostomy for Pyloric Stenosis Jung-Wook Suh, M.D.1, Ye Seob Jee, M.D., Ph.D.1,2 Department of Surgery, 1Dankook University Hospital, 2Dankook University School of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea Purpose: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) remains one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal diseases and Received January 27, 2015 an important target for surgical treatment. Laparoscopy applies to most surgical procedures; however Revised 1st March 9, 2015 its use in elective peptic ulcer surgery, particularly in cases of pyloric stenosis, has not been popular. 2nd March 28, 2015 The aim of this study was to describe the role of laparoscopic surgery and an easily performed Accepted April 20, 2015 procedure for pyloric stenosis. We accordingly performed laparoscopic truncal vagotomy with gastrojejunostomy in 10 consecutive patients with pyloric stenosis. Corresponding author Ye Seob Jee Methods: Data were collected prospectively from all patients who underwent laparoscopic truncal Department of Surgery, Dankook vagotomy with gastrojejunostomy from August 2009 to May 2014 and reviewed retrospectively. University Hospital, Dankook Results: A total of 10 patients underwent laparoscopic trucal vagotomy with gastrojejunostomy for University School of Medicine, 119, peptic ulcer obstruction from August 2009 to May 2014 in ○○ university hospital. The mean age was Dandae-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 62.6 (±16.4) years old and mean BMI was 19.3 (±2.5) kg/m2. There were no conversions to open 330-714, Korea surgery and no occurrence of intra-operative complications.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoracoscopic Truncal Vagotomy Versus Surgical Revision of the Gastrojejunal Anastomosis for Recalcitrant Marginal Ulcers
    Surgical Endoscopy (2019) 33:607–611 and Other Interventional Techniques https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6386-7 2018 SAGES ORAL DYNAMIC Thoracoscopic truncal vagotomy versus surgical revision of the gastrojejunal anastomosis for recalcitrant marginal ulcers Alicia Bonanno1 · Brandon Tieu2 · Elizabeth Dewey1 · Farah Husain3 Received: 1 May 2018 / Accepted: 10 August 2018 / Published online: 21 August 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Introduction Marginal ulcer is a common complication following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with incidence rates between 1 and 16%. Most marginal ulcers resolve with medical management and lifestyle changes, but in the rare case of a non-healing marginal ulcer there are few treatment options. Revision of the gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis carries significant morbidity with complication rates ranging from 10 to 50%. Thoracoscopic truncal vagotomy (TTV) may be a safer alternative with decreased operative times. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of TTV in comparison to GJ revision for treatment of recalcitrant marginal ulcers. Methods A retrospective chart review of patients who required surgical intervention for non-healing marginal ulcers was performed from 1 September 2012 to 1 September 2017. All underwent medical therapy along with lifestyle changes prior to intervention and had preoperative EGD that demonstrated a recalcitrant marginal ulcer. Revision of the GJ anastomosis or TTV was performed. Data collected included operative time, ulcer recurrence, morbidity rate, and mortality rate. Results Twenty patients were identified who underwent either GJ revision (n = 13) or TTV (n = 7). There were no 30-day mortalities in either group.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Sleeve Gastrectomy Plus Trunk Vagotomy Compared with Sleeve Gastrectomy on Glucose Metabolism in Diabetic Rats
    Submit a Manuscript: http://www.f6publishing.com World J Gastroenterol 2017 May 14; 23(18): 3269-3278 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i18.3269 ISSN 1007-9327 (print) ISSN 2219-2840 (online) ORIGINAL ARTICLE Basic Study Effects of sleeve gastrectomy plus trunk vagotomy compared with sleeve gastrectomy on glucose metabolism in diabetic rats Teng Liu, Ming-Wei Zhong, Yi Liu, Xin Huang, Yu-Gang Cheng, Ke-Xin Wang, Shao-Zhuang Liu, San-Yuan Hu Teng Liu, Ming-Wei Zhong, Xin Huang, Yu-Gang Cheng, reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Ke-Xin Wang, Shao-Zhuang Liu, San-Yuan Hu, Department Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this 250012, Shandong Province, China work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and Yi Liu, Health and Family Planning Commission of Shandong the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/ Provincial Medical Guidance Center, Jinan 250012, Shandong licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Province, China Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript Author contributions: Liu T, Liu SZ and Hu SY designed the study and wrote the manuscript; Liu T and Zhong MW instructed Correspondence to: San-Yuan Hu, Professor, Department of on the whole study and prepared the figures; Liu Y and Wang KX General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No. 107, collected and analyzed the data; Liu T, Huang X and Cheng YG Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, performed the operations and performed the observational study; China.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice
    CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Constipation Ian M. Paquette, M.D. • Madhulika Varma, M.D. • Charles Ternent, M.D. Genevieve Melton-Meaux, M.D. • Janice F. Rafferty, M.D. • Daniel Feingold, M.D. Scott R. Steele, M.D. he American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons for functional constipation include at least 2 of the fol- is dedicated to assuring high-quality patient care lowing symptoms during ≥25% of defecations: straining, Tby advancing the science, prevention, and manage- lumpy or hard stools, sensation of incomplete evacuation, ment of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage, relying on anus. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee is com- manual maneuvers to promote defecation, and having less posed of Society members who are chosen because they than 3 unassisted bowel movements per week.7,8 These cri- XXX have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and teria include constipation related to the 3 common sub- rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead inter- types: colonic inertia or slow transit constipation, normal national efforts in defining quality care for conditions re- transit constipation, and pelvic floor or defecation dys- lated to the colon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied function. However, in reality, many patients demonstrate by developing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the symptoms attributable to more than 1 constipation sub- best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive and type and to constipation-predominant IBS, as well. The not prescriptive.
    [Show full text]
  • OT Resource for K9 Overview of Surgical Procedures
    OT Resource for K9 Overview of surgical procedures Prepared by: Hannah Woolley Stage Level 1 2 Gynecology/Oncology Surgeries Lymphadenectomy (lymph node dissection) Surgical removal of lymph nodes Radical: most/all of the lymph nodes in tumour area are removed Regional: some of the lymph nodes in the tumour area are removed Omentectomy Surgical procedure to remove the omentum (thin abdominal tissue that encases the stomach, large intestine and other abdominal organs) Indications for omenectomy: Ovarian cancer Sometimes performed in combination with TAH/BSO Posterior Pelvic Exenteration Surgical removal of rectum, anus, portion of the large intestine, ovaries, fallopian tubes and uterus (partial or total removal of the vagina may also be indicated) Indications for pelvic exenteration Gastrointestinal cancer (bowel, colon, rectal) Gynecological cancer (cervical, vaginal, ovarian, vulvar) Radical Cystectomy Surgical removal of the whole bladder and proximal lymph nodes In men, prostate gland is also removed In women, ovaries and uterus may also be removed Following surgery: Urostomy (directs urine through a stoma on the abdomen) Recto sigmoid pouch/Mainz II pouch (segment of the rectum and sigmoid colon used to provide anal urinary diversion) 3 Radical Vulvectomy Surgical removal of entire vulva (labia, clitoris, vestibule, introitus, urethral meatus, glands/ducts) and surrounding lymph nodes Indication for radical vulvectomy Treatment of vulvar cancer (most common) Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection (SLND) Exploratory procedure where the sentinel lymph node is removed and examined to determine if there is lymph node involvement in patients diagnosed with cancer (commonly breast cancer) Total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral saplingo-oophorectomy (TAH/BSO) Surgical removal of the uterus (including cervix), both fallopian tubes and ovaries Indications for TAH/BSO: Uterine fibroids: benign growths in the muscle of the uterus Endometriosis: condition where uterine tissue grows on structures outside the uterus (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • A Matched Cohort Analysis of Single Anastomosis Loop Duodenal Switch Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass with 18-Month Follow-Up - Springer
    A matched cohort analysis of single anastomosis loop duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 18-month follow-up - Springer Search Submit Article Surgical Endoscopy pp 1-7 First online: 22 December 2015 A matched cohort analysis of single anastomosis loop duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 18-month follow-up Austin Cottam, Daniel Cottam , Walter Medlin, Christina Richards, Samuel Cottam, Hinali Zaveri, Amit Surve 10.1007/s00464-015-4707-7 Copyright information Abstract Background The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) has been considered the gold standard for many years. The loop duodenal switch (LDS) is a relatively new procedure that simplifies the complexity of the duodenal switch (BPDDS) by making it a single anastomosis procedure while at the same time giving it more intestinal absorption to reduce the rates of malnutrition associated with traditional BPDDS. This paper seeks to compare the 18-month weight loss outcomes and complications of the more standard GBP with the newer LDS in a single US center. Methods A retrospective matched cohort was analyzed on 108 patients who had either GBP (54 patients) or LDS (54 patients). Regression analysis was used to compare weight loss outcomes as measured by BMI and weight loss percentages. Complications gathered included bleeds, reoperations, diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopy (EGD), ulcers and chronic nausea. Results GBP and LDS have statistically similar weight loss at 18 months (39.6 vs 41 % weight loss, respectively). However, there were significantly more nausea complaints (26 vs 5), diagnostic endoscopies (EGD) (21 vs 3) and ulcers (6 vs 0) with the GBP than the LDS.
    [Show full text]
  • Biliopancreatic Diversion with a Duodenal Switch
    Obesity Surgeuy, 8, 267-282 Biliopancreatic Diversion with a Duodenal Switch Douglas S. Hess MD, FACS; Douglas W. Hess MD Wood County Hospital, Bowling Green, OH, USA Background: This paper evaluates biliopancreatic BPD without some of the associated problems. diversion combined with the duodenal switch, form- This operation is now used by us for all our ing a hybrid procedure which is a combination of bariatric patients, both in primary surgical proce- restriction and malabsorption. Methods: The evaluation is of the first 440 patients dures and reoperations. undergoing this procedure who had had no previous The difficulty of establishing an operation that bariatric surgery. The mean starting weight was has both long- and short-term success is well 183 kg, with 41% of our patients considered super known. Bariatric surgery is either restrictive or morbidly obese (BMI > 50). malabsorptive in nature, each with its own ad- Results: There was an average maximum weight loss of 80% excess weight by 24 months post- vantages, disadvantages and complications. While operation; this continued at a 70% level for 8 years. trying to find a procedure that would produce Major complications were found in almost 9% of the better long-term results and fewer failures, i.e. cases. There were two perioperative deaths, one regain of weight, we began to look at the from pulmonary embolism and one from acute Scopinaro BPD.l First of all we considered it pulmonary obstruction. There were 36 type II dia- betics, all of whom have discontinued medication only for reoperations on failed restrictive proce- following the surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Patients Having a Sigmoid Colectomy
    Patient information – Pre-operative Assessment Clinic Information for patients having a sigmoid colectomy This leaflet will explain what will happen when you come to the hospital for your operation. It is important that you understand what to expect and feel able to take an active role in your treatment. Your surgeon will have already discussed your treatment with you and will give advice about what to do when you get home. What is a sigmoid colectomy? This operation involves removing the sigmoid colon, which lies on the left side of your abdominal cavity (tummy). We would then normally join the remaining left colon to the top of the rectum (the ‘storage’ organ of the bowel). The lines on the attached diagram show the piece of bowel being removed. This operation is done with you asleep (general anaesthetic). The operation not only removes the bowel containing the tumour but also removes the draining lymph glands from this part of the bowel. This is sent to the pathologists who will then analyse each bit of the bowel and the lymph glands in detail under the microscope. This operation can often be completed in a ‘keyhole’ manner, which means less trauma to the abdominal muscles, as the biggest wound is the one to remove the bowel from the abdomen. Sometimes, this is not possible, in which case the same operation is done through a bigger incision in the abdominal wall – this is called an ‘open’ operation. It does take longer to recover with an open operation but, if it is necessary, it is the safest thing to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastroenterostomy and Vagotomy for Chronic Duodenal Ulcer
    Gut, 1969, 10, 366-374 Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.10.5.366 on 1 May 1969. Downloaded from Gastroenterostomy and vagotomy for chronic duodenal ulcer A. W. DELLIPIANI, I. B. MACLEOD1, J. W. W. THOMSON, AND A. A. SHIVAS From the Departments of Therapeutics, Clinical Surgery, and Pathology, The University ofEdinburgh The number of operative procedures currently in Kingdom answered a postal questionnaire. Eight had vogue in the management of chronic duodenal ulcer died since operation, and three could not be traced. The indicates that none has yet achieved definitive status. patients were questioned particularly with regard to Until recent years, partial gastrectomy was the eating capacity, dumping symptoms, vomiting, ulcer-type dyspepsia, diarrhoea or other change in bowel habit, and favoured operation, but an increasing awareness of a clinical assessment was made based on a modified its significant operative mortality and its metabolic Visick scale. The mean time since operation was 6-9 consequences, along with Dragstedt and Owen's years. demonstration of the effectiveness of vagotomy in Thirty-five patients from this group were admitted to reducing acid secretion (1943), has resulted in the hospital for a full investigation of gastrointestinal and widespread use of vagotomy and gastric drainage. related function two to seven years following their The success of duodenal ulcer surgery cannot be operation. Most were volunteers, but some were selected judged only on low stomal (or recurrent) ulceration because of definite complaints. There were more females rates; the other sequelae of gastric operations must than males (21 females and 14 males). The following be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • A Patient's Guide to Colostomy Care
    Northwestern Memorial Hospital Patient Education CARE AND TREATMENT A Patient’s Guide to Colostomy Care This information will help you understand your surgical procedure. It also will be a resource for your ostomy care after leaving the hospital. Feel free to write down any questions you may have for your physician and nurse. During your hospital Figure 1 To understand stay you will be visited by a wound, how your ostomy ostomy and continence Pharynx (WOC) nurse. A WOC nurse functions, you is trained and certified in complete care of Esophagus need to become patients with an ostomy. This nurse will work with familiar with the your physician and staff nurses to aid you digestive tract. in your recovery. Stomach Once you leave Transverse the hospital, the Ascending colon WOC nurse will colon continue to be a Descending resource for you. colon Small Cecum The digestive system intestine Rectum To understand how your ostomy functions, Sigmoid colon you need to become familiar with the digestive tract Anus (see Figure 1). When you eat, food travels from the Digestive Tract mouth to the stomach. It then moves to the small intestine, where digestion is completed. Here, the nutrients from the food are absorbed for use by your body. The unused parts of the food will then pass into the colon, which collects the stool and absorbs water from the remaining material. By the time this waste reaches the rectum, it is in a solid form. When the waste leaves the body, it is called a bowel movement (BM), stool or feces.
    [Show full text]
  • Mucocele of the Appendix - Appendectomy Or Colectomy?
    Original Article Mucocele of the appendix - appendectomy or colectomy? JANDUÍ GOMES DE ABREU FILHO1, ERIVALDO FERNANDES DE LIRA1 1Service of Coloproctology of Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal (HBDF), Secretariat of Health in Distrito Federal - Brasília (DF), Brazil. FILHO JGDA; LIRA EFD. Mucocele of the appendix - appendectomy or colectomy? Rev bras Coloproct, 2011;31(3): 276-284. ABSTRACT: Mucocele of the appendix is a rare disease. It can be triggered by benign or malignant diseases, which cause the obstruc- tion of the appendix and the consequent accumulation of mucus secretion. The preoperative diagnosis is difficult due to non-specific clinical manifestations of the disease. Imaging tests can suggest the diagnosis. The treatment is always surgical and depends on the integrity and size of the appendix base and on the histological type of the original lesion. The prognosis is good in cases of integrity of the appendix. The perforation of the appendix and subsequent extravasation of its contents into the abdominal cavity may lead to pseudomyxoma peritonei, which has very poor prognosis if not treated properly. Keywords: mucocele; appendix; pseudomyxoma peritonei; treatment. INTRODUCTION first one defends the right colectomy as a treatment9, and the second one recommends only appendecto- The mucocele of the appendix was first de- my10. Despite the different adopted conducts, in both scribed in 1842 by Rokitansky1. This disease is reported cases a cystadenoma was diagnosed in the considered as a rare lesion of the appendix, which appendix; the choice was for elective surgery. is found in 0.2 to 0.3% of the appendectomies2. It The objective of this review is to analyze liter- is characterized by the dilation of the organ lumen ature as to mucocele, especially regarding diagnosis with mucus accumulation, being more frequent and treatment, besides discussing follow-up and prog- among individuals aged 50 years or more3,4.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Oral Anticoagulants Use in the Setting of Bariatric Surgery and Feeding Tubes Excellence.Acforum.Org
    Rapid Resource Direct Oral Anticoagulants Use in the Setting of Bariatric Surgery and Feeding Tubes excellence.acforum.org ACE Rapid Resources are not informed practice guidelines; they are Anticoagulation Forum, Inc.’s best recommendations based on (DOACs) NOTES current knowledge, and no warranty or guaranty is expressed or implied. The content provided is for informational purposes for medical • DOACs are absorbed at various professionals only and is not intended to be used or relied upon by them as specific medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment, the locations throughout the determination of which remains the responsibility of the medical professionals for their patients. gastrointestinal tract. Bariatric Surgery (See Table 1) • Bariatric surgery results in weight FIGURE 1 – Types of Bariatric Surgery loss by reducing stomach volume (which results in a more alkaline pH) A B C D and/or reducing effective intestinal surface area which results in malabsorption. • There is very little evidence regarding safety and efficacy of DOACs in patients with a history of bariatric surgery or requiring DOAC administration via a feeding tube. A. Adjustable gastric banding (AGB): Adjustable silicone band placed around stomach to create a smaller pouch. • This document was compiled utilizing current literature incorporating case B. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): reports, package inserts, and Stomach stapled to form gastric pouch that connects to distal jejunum, excluding the duodenum and proximal jejunum. pharmacokinetic studies as no current C. Gastrectomy (partial or total): randomized controlled trials are Sleeve gastrectomy results in longitudinal resection of 80% of stomach. available. As always, clinical judgment D. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS): and a shared decision making Gastric pouch reattached more distally to terminal ileum resulting in considerable reduction in absorptive surface approach should be utilized.
    [Show full text]