DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Columbia Watershed Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Columbia Watershed Management Plan Final Columbia Watershed Management Plan April 22 , 2009 Final Columbia Watershed Management Plan Prepared for Columbia Association 10221 Wincopin Center Columbia, MD 21044 Prepared by Mark Southerland Beth Franks Steve Harriott Tom Jones Brenda Morgan Alexi Boado Versar, Inc. 9200 Rumsey Road Suite 100 Columbia, MD 20145 and Carrie Capuco Kimi Will Capuco Consulting Services, Inc. McCormick Taylor 214 Duke of Gloucester Street 509 South Exeter Street, 4th Floor Annapolis, MD 21401 Baltimore, MD 21202 April 22, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................i 1. Goals and Objectives...................................................................................................................1 2. Technical Approach and Work Plan.........................................................................................5 3. Condition of the Columbia Watersheds and Priorities for Restoration.................................7 3.1 Status of Watershed Planning in Columbia.........................................................................7 3.2 Condition of Columbia Watersheds..................................................................................12 3.3 List of Phase 1 Subwatersheds..........................................................................................19 4. Phase 1 Restoration in Priority Subwatersheds .....................................................................27 4.1 Field Investigations ...........................................................................................................27 4.2 List of Retrofit Projects.....................................................................................................29 4.3 Concept Plans....................................................................................................................39 5. Early Action Projects throughout the Columbia Watersheds ..............................................63 5.1 Reforestation Opportunities ..............................................................................................63 5.2 Stormwater Management and Landscaping at CA Facilities ............................................66 5.3 Neighborhood Actions ......................................................................................................74 5.4 List of Early Action Projects.............................................................................................79 6. Stakeholder Involvement..........................................................................................................83 6.1 Stakeholder Involvement Planning ...................................................................................83 6.2 Community Stewardship Strategy.....................................................................................84 7. Recommendations for Future Actions.....................................................................................87 8. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................93 9. References ..................................................................................................................................95 Appendices A. Glossary of Watershed Terms B. Maps of the 20 Subwatersheds in CWMP Study Area, including Stream Conditions, Restoration Sites (Retrofits), and Reforestation Sites C. CWMP Interim Work Products by Task xi LIST OF TABLES Table No. Page 2-1. Work Plan for the Columbia Watershed Management Plan......................................................6 3-1. Number, name, and parent watershed of each subwatershed in the CWMP study area............7 3-2. Metrics used in comparative subwatershed assessment ..........................................................23 3-3. Problem, ecological value, and restoration opportunity score sums and weighted restoration potential score for each Columbia subwatershed ..................................................24 4-1. Potential restoration projects developed for the six priority subwatersheds ...........................31 4-2. Potential restoration sites identified using Retrofit Reconnaissance Investigations in the priority subwatersheds...................................................................................................32 4-3. Restoration sites with concept plans (Tier 1 sites) in the Lake Elkhorn subwatershed...........41 5-1. Model planting plan for native trees on 4 acres at the Columbia Association Dorsey Hall site....................................................................................................................................64 5-2. Sites investigated for reforestation opportunities in the Columbia watersheds.......................67 5-3. Summary of Neighborhood Source Assessment results and recommended community actions for Columbia, Maryland..............................................................................................75 5-4. Early action projects for the CWMP, including reforestation on CA Open Space, pollu- tion prevention at CA Facilities, and community actions in Columbia neighborhoods..........80 xii LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Page 3-1. Number and boundaries of each subwatershed in the CWMP study area.................................8 3-2. Watershed areas within the CWMP study area expected to have an adequate water shed plan that can supplement the CWMP..............................................................................11 3-3. Biological assessment results for all sites sampled in the CWMP study area since 2000 ......13 3-4. Green infrastructure hubs and corridors and Ecologically Significant Areas identified by Maryland DNR in the CWMP study area...........................................................................15 3-5. Six priority subwatersheds selected for more intensive analysis in Phase 1 of CWMP .........25 4-1. Stream condition in the six priority subwatersheds based on Stream Corridor Assessment (SCA) data ...........................................................................................................28 4-2. Location of 116 candidate sites, 66 restoration (RRI) sites, and 18 concept plan sites in the six priority subwatersheds .............................................................................................38 4-3. Location of candidate sites, restoration (RRI) sites, and concept plan sites in the Lake Elkhorn subwatershed .............................................................................................................44 4-4. Concept plan for LE-RRI-001: New Pond off Brush Run Road.............................................45 4-5. Concept plan for LE-RRI-002: LID at end of Deep Pasture...................................................46 4-6. Concept plan for LE-RRI-003: LID at end of Mendenhall Court ...........................................47 4-7. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-011: SWM Pond Retrofit of existing pond off Emerson’s Reach.......................................................................................................................................48 4-8. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-012: LID off Cloud Leap Court.....................................................49 4-9. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-013: LID corner of Tamar Drive and Lambskin Lane ..................50 4-10. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-015: Stream Restoration off Queen Maria Court and Blade Green Court...................................................................................................................51 4-11. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-019: Stream Bank Stabilization at end of Spinning Seed..............52 4-12. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-020: Stream Stabilization at corner of Dobbin Road and Mendenhall Court....................................................................................................................53 4-13. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-024: LID at end of Windbell Lane ................................................54 4-14. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-026: LID at corner of Smooth Path and Honeyladen....................55 4-15. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-501: LID behind Celebration Church............................................56 4-16. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-502: LID at Dobbin, behind Playwide Kids.................................57 4-17. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-503: LID at Dobbin, in front of Playwise Kids.............................58 4-18. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-504: LID near Owen Brown YMCA.............................................59 4-19. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-505: LID along Homespun Drive.................................................60 4-20. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-506: Stream Restoration off Garland Way, outfalls into 507........61 4-21. Concept Plan for LE-RRI-507: Stream Restoration off Bugledrum .......................................62 5-1. Enhanced aerial photograph depicting two potential forest planting areas covering 4 acres (outlined in red) at the Columbia Association Dorsey Hall site..............................................65 xiii xiv 1. Goals and Objectives The Columbia Association (CA) is developing a Columbia Watershed Management Plan (CWMP or Plan) that outlines a long-term, far-reaching strategy to protect and restore the Little and Middle Patuxent Rivers and adjacent waters. The CWMP will support ongoing efforts and provide a sustainable pathway to effectively manage these Columbia watersheds going forward. Ultimate suc- cess in meeting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Branch Patapsco River Watershed Characterization Plan
    South Branch Patapsco River Watershed Characterization Plan Spring 2016 Prepared by Carroll County Bureau of Resource Management South Branch Patapsco Watershed Characterization Plan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iv List of Appendices .......................................................................................................................... v List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... vi I. Characterization Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 A. Purpose of the Characterization ....................................................................................... 1 B. Location and Scale of Analysis ........................................................................................ 1 C. Report Organization ......................................................................................................... 3 II. Natural Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 5 A. Introduction .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Rockburn Branch Park
    DIRECTIONS: River Hill June 24 6050 Daybreak Circle, Clarksville, MD 21029 From Interstate 95, take MD Rt 32 West (Exit 38) toward Columbia to Clarksville. Proceed to MD Rt 32 directions. From Interstate 70, take MD Rt 32 South to Clarksville. From MD Rt 32, Exit onto MD Rt 108 (Exit 20) East toward Columbia. Go approximately 1/4 mile to the River Hill Village Center, and turn right onto Great Star Dr. AVA-264 Turn left onto Daybreak Cir. Park in the Village Center parking lot near Giant Food. Presents Three Saturday Morning Harper’s Choice August 5 5440 Old Tucker Row, Columbia, MD 21044 From Interstate 95: take Exit 38 (Route 32) west towards Columbia for 4 miles to Cedar Lane. Turn Right on Cedar Lane and follow to end. Turn Left, then right to enter Harpers Choice Village Center. From Route 70, take Route 32 east towards Columbia for 12 miles to Cedar Lane. In Columbia, Howard County, Maryland Turn Left on Cedar Lane and follow to end. Turn Left, then right to enter and park at the Harpers Choice Village Center. June 24 River Hill AT2017/107720; 10 km/5 km; Trail Rating 2A Owen Brown September 9 7246 Cradlerock Way, Columbia, Maryland 21045 August 5 Harper’s Choice From Baltimore or Washington: Take I-95 to Maryland Route 32, Exit 38B toward Columbia AT2017/107751; 10 km/5 km; Trail Rating 2A Take Exit 38B onto Route 32 W, toward Columbia 1.6 miles. Take the first Exit onto Broken Land Parkway north toward Owen September 9 Owen Brown Brown (go about .7 miles).
    [Show full text]
  • Gunpowder River
    Table of Contents 1. Polluted Runoff in Baltimore County 2. Map of Baltimore County – Percentage of Hard Surfaces 3. Baltimore County 2014 Polluted Runoff Projects 4. Fact Sheet – Baltimore County has a Problem 5. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Back River 6. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Gunpowder River 7. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Middle River 8. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Patapsco River 9. FAQs – Polluted Runoff and Fees POLLUTED RUNOFF IN BALTIMORE COUNTY Baltimore County contains the headwaters for many of the streams and tributaries feeding into the Patapsco River, one of the major rivers of the Chesapeake Bay. These tributaries include Bodkin Creek, Jones Falls, Gwynns Falls, Patapsco River Lower North Branch, Liberty Reservoir and South Branch Patapsco. Baltimore County is also home to the Gunpowder River, Middle River, and the Back River. Unfortunately, all of these streams and rivers are polluted by nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment and are considered “impaired” by the Maryland Department of the Environment, meaning the water quality is too low to support the water’s intended use. One major contributor to that pollution and impairment is polluted runoff. Polluted runoff contaminates our local rivers and streams and threatens local drinking water. Water running off of roofs, driveways, lawns and parking lots picks up trash, motor oil, grease, excess lawn fertilizers, pesticides, dog waste and other pollutants and washes them into the streams and rivers flowing through our communities. This pollution causes a multitude of problems, including toxic algae blooms, harmful bacteria, extensive dead zones, reduced dissolved oxygen, and unsightly trash clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan Progress Report Fiscal Year 2016
    Strategic Plan Progress Report Fiscal Year 2016 July 2016 Introduction This report provides a one-year review of actions taken to achieve Columbia Association’s (CA) Strategic Plan goals and objectives. This is the second annual Strategic Plan Progress Report. It highlights CA’s accomplishments in FY 2016 (May 2015 through April 2016) as CA works toward achieving its vision of ―Making Columbia the community of choice — today and for generations to come.‖ Columbia Association’s current Strategic Plan was developed in 2013 and 2014 and became effective May 1, 2014, as approved by the Board of Directors. The strategic planning process included a review of trends and driving forces, as well as self-examination. CA also engaged an extensive group of different stakeholders and organizations that interact with or are impacted by CA. This helped CA develop a framework of goals and objectives to achieve its desired future. Moving the Needle - Recent Progress/Activities Columbia Association’s Strategic Plan identifies five high-level goals to guide the organization. 1. Deliver programs and services that meet stakeholders’ expectations and enhance the quality of life in Columbia 2. Maintain and enhance Columbia’s facilities, open spaces, connectivity and environmental stewardship 3. Develop and communicate a shared community vision for Columbia and advance the vision through advocacy, partnerships and alignment of CA programs and services 4. Strengthen communication and community engagement in CA 5. Demonstrate the practices of a high-performing and responsive organization This progress report is organized by Strategic Plan goal. Additional detail is provided in the appendix. We’re Serving ―Deliver programs and services that meet stakeholders’ expectations and enhance the quality of life in Columbia‖ Overview CA’s mission is ―Working every day in hundreds of ways to make Columbia an even better place to live, work and play.‖ CA offers a wide array of programs, events, activities and services putting that mission into action.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Archives Ephemera-Memorabilia-Artifacts Collection
    Columbia Archives Ephemera-Memorabilia-Artifacts Collection James W. Rouse's "Photo James W. Rouse's Fishing James W. Rouse's Ice Skates, Shoot" Eyeglasses, n.d. Pole, n.d. n.d. Desk Pen Set Presented to Shovel for Cherry Hill Mall Shovel for The Rouse James W. Rouse from the Expansion Ground Breaking, Company Headquarters Young Columbians, 1975 1976 Ground Breaking, 1972 Whistle Nancy Allison Used Cross Keys Inn Ashtray, n.d. Waterside Restaurant to Summon James W. Rouse Ashtray, n.d. to Meetings, n.d. Columbia Bank and Trust People Tree Ashtray, 1968 Clyde's Restaurant Ashtray, Company Ashtray, 1968 n.d. Columbia All Star Swim Head Ski and Sportswear Columbia Volksmarch Club Meet Badge, n.d. Company Badge, n.d. Badge for Columbia's 20th Birthday, 1987 Columbia Volksmarch Club Town Center 25th Columbia Bank and Trust Badge, 1986 Anniversary Products, 1999 Company Moneybag, n.d. The Mall in Columbia 40th Produce Galore Bag for Kings Contrivance Village Anniversary Shopping Bag, Coffee Beans, 2008 Center Shopping Bag, n.d. 2011 Wilde Lake Village Green Columbia Aquatics Owen Brown Interfaith Holiday Shopping Bag, n.d. Association Swim Bag, n.d. Center Token Noting Surplus Budget, ca. 1984 Hickory Ridge Village Columbia 20th Birthday Rotary Club of Columbia Center Ball, n.d. Balloon, 1987 Town Center Banner, n.d. Rotary Club of Columbia Sewell's Orchards Fruit Sewell's Orchards Fruit Banner, n.d. Basket, n.d. Basket, n.d. www.ColumbiaArchives.org Page 1 Columbia Archives Ephemera-Memorabilia-Artifacts Collection "Columbia: The Next Columbia Voyage Wine Columbia 20th Birthday America Game", 1982 Bottle, 1992 Chateau Columbia Wine Bottle, 1986 Columbia 20th Birthday Santa Remembers Me ™ Merriweather Park at Champagne Bottle, 1987 Bracelet from the Mall Symphony Woods Bracelet, in Columbia, 2007 2015 Anne Dodd for Howard Columbia Gardeners Bumper Columbia Business Card County School Board Sticker, 1974 Case, n.d.
    [Show full text]
  • School's Closed
    ColumbiaAssociation sas school age services SCHOOL’S CLOSED FULL DAY PROGRAM APRIL 6-APRIL 13 Registration deadline: Friday, March 20 Hours for School’s Closed program are 7am to 6pm. Cost of each program is $55 for non-full-day payment participants. Payment must be made with the registration or it will not be accepted. Please note: Children in Pre-K can only be registered for the Jr. Club program. For a complete description of all School Age Services programs, including our Parent Handbook, visit ColumbiaAssociation.org/SchoolCare JR. CLUB Open to childen in Pre-K and elementary school Hello, spring! Join us for a spring break session filled with hands-on seasonal activities — including magic water blossoms (a blend of art and science), colorful collages of the world’s natural wonders, and handmade D.I.Y. sun catchers. We will also make scented spring play dough, enjoy a spring scavenger hunt and unicorn rainbow slime! Children need to bring a bag lunch. FIELD TRIPS Please dress children for the location, walking, and weather conditions! No sandals, flip-flops or Crocs. MONDAY, APRIL 6 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 8 Hyper Kidz Trip Option 2: Columbia (and Lake Elkhorn for lunch) National Aquarium Limited to the first 45 children enrolled. Baltimore Bus departs at 9:30am and returns at 1:45pm. (open to grades 4 and up) Hyper Kidz’ ocean-themed playground offers more Limited to the first 13 children enrolled. than 10,000 square feet of interactive rides, obstacles, Bus departs at 9:15am and returns at 2pm. slides and more, where children immerse themselves With a mission to inspire conservation of the world’s in a magical ocean world of endless fun and never get aquatic treasures, the aquarium features more than bored! The children will eat lunch, weather permitting, 20,000 fish, birds, amphibians, reptiles and marine at Lake Elkhorn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Goldfinch
    HOWARD COUNTY BIRD CLUB THE GOLDFINCH- A CHAPTER OF THE MARYLAND ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY MARCH -APRIL 2002 VOLUME 30, NUMBER 4 AUTUMN BIRD RECORDS: AUGUST 1 TO NOVEMBER 30, 2001 BY JOANNE SOLEM erhaps once a decade Howard . EPo-1 SEASa11 tioN1RO COl.MY E1RD S1G1i1'1G, ARE COM='ILED NO SlB.fTTED TO NINMNID County birders are treated to an BRJlR !ff) Flaa Nt:m!S.. 8Ec>JJsE BOl'H Pl.8.JCATIONS PROWE OVERVIEVIS FOR LMGE M&S, P CK.YA� CF HcMMo COl.MY SIGHTINGS lff.:. PI.BJSI-ED. TH: RECORDS lff.:. 001" LOST, exceptional year. Not since 1994 have we HOJ\E\IER, FOR n£Y lff.:. TI-£ BASIS FOR COlMY RECORDS. Au. RECORDS ARE ve..coPIED HO enjoyed the variety of unusual species that APPRECIATED. AN( IIID\,OJAL WiO TI.RNS N SEASONAL SIGHTl,IGS RECEIVES A CX:P'f CF TH: CCUffi' CQIFILATION. To REa.ESr A FORM a-.J WiCH TO LOG DATES, PLEASE CALL 301-725-5037. Tl-£ 2001 brought our way. The best was 8aARo � REQLESTEO THAT A aGEST CF TI-£ SEASONAL HGHJGH1'S APPEAR NTH: N3IIS.E1TER. saved for last as field birders savored the 08sERvERs lff.:. HU UWL TO BY TH3R NTIAI...S (SEE TI-£ Ll$T AT TH: EN) CF TH: ARTICLE). array of special birds during fall migra• (BO,MJB). These egret si� are ind.i- gional Parle (WSTRP) (BO,JS,KT) in the tion. Although some of the sightings will cators that the Middle Patuxent Restora- a.m., while that evening flocks were be subject to local Records Committee tion Project (MPRP) at the farm is a ma- heard passing over Hammond Village scrutiny before acceptance, the highlights turing success story as other records in between 9:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Goldfinch Newsletter of the Howard County Bird Club a Chapter of the Maryland Ornithological Society
    May/June 2019 Volume 47, Issue 5 The Goldfinch Newsletter of the Howard County Bird Club A Chapter of the Maryland Ornithological Society www.howardbirds.org Club Meeting - By Jane Geuder Inside this Issue: hursday, May 9, 2019 “Mongolia: Birding in the Footsteps of Genghis T Khan,” by Gail Mackiernan. To the naturalist, Gail’s June 2018 trip into immense grasslands, the vast Gobi Desert, wild mountains, and varied Club Meeting ......................... 1 wetlands is of great interest. The group recorded about 175 of the planet’s Winter Bird Records ............. 1 most wanted birds. Gail and Barry are club members. They have traveled Field Trips ............................ 2 on seven continents and have seen more than 6,000 bird species. Managing a Rare Bird ........... 2 Meetings are at the Robinson Nature Center, 6692 Cedar Lane, Columbia MD 21044. Hospi- May Count ............................ 6 tality at 7:00 p.m. Meeting with program begins at 7:30 p.m. There is no admission charge. Board of Directors Meeting ... 6 For further information call Mary Lou Clark at 410-465-4061. Mid-winter Count Summary .. 7 Website: http://www.howardcountymd.gov/RobinsonNatureCenter New Members ....................... 9 Potluck Thanks ................... 10 Birding Basics Class ............ 10 WINTER BIRD RECORDS: DECEMBER 1, 2018 – FEBRUARY 28, 2019 BY JOANNE SOLEM Birding in Mongolia he 2018-19 winter was typical for central Maryland with cold, snow, T ice, sleet, fog, rain, a polar vortex, and record heat! And with those dramatic weather changes came a Greater White-fronted Goose, Trumpeter Swans, and Iceland Gulls. The predicted invasion of boreal species enter- tained many feeder watchers; special species included one Evening Gros- beak and one Common Redpoll.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the BOARD of DIRECTORS MEETING Held: July 23, 2015
    Minutes of the BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Held: July 23, 2015 Approved: October 8, 2015 A meeting of the Columbia Association Board of Directors was held on Thursday, July 23, 2015, at the Columbia Association Building. Present were Chairperson Jeanne Ketley and members Dick Boulton, Brian Dunn, Janet Evans, Alan Klein, Nancy McCord, Gregg Schwind (arrived 7:33 p.m.), and Andrew Stack. Members Reg Avery and Chao Wu were absent. Also present were CA President/CEO Milton Matthews, Chief Staff Liaisons Susan Krabbe (arrived 7:35 p.m.) and Norma Heim, Governance Chief of Staff Jane Dembner, and General Counsel Sheri Fanaroff (arrived 7:33 p.m.). 1. Call to Order: The Board of Directors Meeting was called to order at 7:29 p.m. by the Chair, Jeanne Ketley. 2. Announcement of Closed/Special Meetings Held/To Be Held: The Architectural Resource Committee held a closed meeting at the Columbia Association Building on July 13, 2015 to discuss covenant cases. Members present were: Jane Dembner, Craig Garrison, Debbie Bach, and Gordon MacPhee. Also present were: Ingrid Hatz, Carole MacPhee, Debbie Nix, Pat Loeber, Carl McKinney, Karen Turcan, Dale Wasmus, and Sheri Fanaroff. The vote to close the meeting was 4-0-0. The closed meeting was authorized under the Maryland Homeowners Act, Md. Code, Real Property §11B-111 (4)(iv) Consultation with staff personnel, consultants, attorneys, or other persons in connection with pending or potential litigation or other legal matters. The meeting was closed from 1:15 p.m. until 2:00 p.m. The Audit Committee held a closed meeting at the Columbia Association Building on July 22, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Quick Reference
    2021 2021 12, Quick Reference August 1. Maintain and improve environmental quality and encourage economic prosperity while preserving the county’s rural character. 2. Promote land use, planning, and development concepts and practices that support citizens’ health, safety, well-being, individual rights and the economic viability of Carroll County. 3. Maintain safe and adequate drinking water and other water supplies including efforts to protect and restore the Chesapeake Bay. 4. Strive to protect our natural resources for future generations. Solar Panel Surface Area Maximum Square Footage for Ground-Mounted Systems in Lot Size Residential Zones <= ½ acre 120 square feet >½ acre 240 square feet >1 acre to 3 acres 480 square feet Aggregate square footage of the roof, or >3 acres roofs of structures, situated on the subject property In May 2021, the Commissioners amended the County Zoning Code to allow community solar energy generating systems (CSEGSs) on remaining portions in the Agricultural Zone. The Code requires a permanent easement on the rest of the property, co-location with agricultural uses or pollinator friendly plantings, and landscaped screening. An outreach booklet provides information on the amendment. The County installed solar arrays on 3 different County properties – Carroll Community College, Hoods Mill Landfill, and Hampstead WWTP – to conserve energy and realize cost savings. These facilities came online in 2018. In 2018, Carroll County received a Silver Designation by the national Fiscal Year # of Permits SolSmart program. 2015 383 2016 606 2017 463 2018 312 2019 194 2020 157 Carroll protected 102 miles of buffered streams under easements. As of December 2020, water recharge areas were protected on 3,599 acres incorporated into 27 easements.
    [Show full text]
  • Patuxent River and Patapsco River Watershed Assessments Howard County, Maryland
    HOWARD COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION Patuxent River and Patapsco River Watershed Assessments Howard County, Maryland Thorough watershed assessment helps Howard County, Maryland chart the course toward county-wide water quality improvement. conducted stream assessments For the second phase of of the County’s two water- each watershed assessment, sheds: the Southern Middle Biohabitats developed con- Patuxent, and the Patapsco cepts for the highest priority River South Branch. The goal proposed retrofit and res- of the assessments was to toration opportunities. The identify and prioritize oppor- concepts, which included tunities to improve water qual- approaches such as channel ity through stream restoration, stabilization, Regenerative outfall stabilization, new Stormwater Conveyance stormwater Best Management (RSC), bioretention facili- Practices (BMP), tree planting, ties, and tree plantings, were and BMP conversion projects. designed to provide eco- The assessments integrated ele- logical habitat and stormwater from top: Watershed assessment of Howard County’s ments of the Stream Corridor filtration while also helping natural resources; Severly eroded initial conditions Assessment (SCA), Rapid the County estimate imple- Bioassessment Protocol (RBP), mentation costs and meet oward County’s Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit Bank Assessment for Non- Total Maximum Daily Load H Water Management requirement. To tackle the point source Consequences (TMDL) targets established Division set an ambitious daunting task that encom- of Sediment (BANCS), and for phosphorus and sediment goal of performing compre- passed a 253-square-mile Retrofit Reconnaissance in the local watersheds. hensive assessments of the study area, Howard County Inventory (RRI) with other County’s watersheds over a turned to their team of on- qualitative site data on the SERVICES two-year period to satisfy their call consultants.
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Implementation Strategy
    COUNTYWIDE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY TMDL AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RESTORATION PLAN HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND DECEMBER 2015 COUNTYWIDE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY DECEMBER 2015 PREPARED FOR HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 6751 COLUMBIA GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 514 COLUMBIA, MD 21046-3143 PREPARED BY KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 936 RIDGEBROOK ROAD SPARKS, MD 21152 WITH SUPPORT FROM MCCORMICK TAYLOR, INC. TH 509 S. EXETER STREET, 4 FLOOR BALTIMORE, MD 21202 Countywide Implementation Strategy 2015 Acknowledgements This watershed restoration plan was completed as a collaborative effort between the following partners: Howard County Stormwater Management Division KCI Technologies, Inc. McCormick Taylor, Inc. The report was authored by the following individuals from KCI Technologies, Inc.: Megan Crunkleton Mike Pieper Bill Frost, P.E. Database support and GIS analyses were provided by McCormick Taylor, Inc.: Joe Knieriem County staff providing expertise, oversight, and review include: Kelly Hargadin Christine Lowe, P.E. Mark Richmond, P.E. Appropriate citation for the CIS is as follow: KCI Technologies, Inc. 2015. Countywide Implementation Strategy. Prepared by KCI Technologies, Inc., Sparks MD for Howard County Department of Public Works, Stormwater Management Division, Columbia Maryland. Dated December 2015. For more information pertaining to the CIS, please contact: Mark S. Richmond, Chief Stormwater Management Division Howard County Department of Public Works 6751 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 514 Columbia,
    [Show full text]