DOCSLIB.ORG

Sizewell C Community Forum 16 December 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EDF Energy Sizewell C Community Forum 16 December 2019 Attendees: Brian Stewart OBE, Community Forum Chair Mary Ann Woolf, Leiston-cum-Sizewell Town Council Jim Crawford, EDF Energy Nick Mayo, Leiston, Saxmundham and District Citizens Advice Bureau Tom McGarry, EDF Energy Richard Cooper, Marlesford Parish Council Richard Bull, EDF Energy Bill Banks, Melton Parish Council Stephen Roast, EDF Energy Roy Dowding, Middleton-cum-Fordley Parish Council Rebecca Calder, EDF Energy Jeff Hallett, Pettistree Parish Council Peter Palmer, Aldeburgh Town Council Mike Stevenson, Rendlesham Parish Council David Secret, Benhall and Sternfield Parish Council Adam Rowlands, RSPB Minsmere Nature Reserve David Hepper, Bredfield Parish Council David Sims, Sibton Parish Council Richard Fernley, Campsea Ashe Parish Council Pat Hogan, Sizewell Residents Association Michael Simons, Darsham Parish Council Ian Bradbury, Southwold Town Council Rod Smith, Dunwich Parish Meeting Simon Amstutz, Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB Jocelyn Bond, East Suffolk District Council Rachel Fulcher, Suffolk Coastal Friends of the Earth Tony Cooper, East Suffolk District Council Leigh Jenkins, Suffolk Constabulary Philip Ridley, East Suffolk District Council Bryn Griffiths, Suffolk County Council Simon Barlow, Environment Agency Russ Rainger, Suffolk County Council Ian Norman, Farnham with Stratford St Andrew Parish Alan Miller, Suffolk Wildlife Trust Council Sue Jackson, Friston Parish Council Stephen Brett, Theberton & Eastbridge Parish Council Argus Gathorne-Hardy, Gt Glemham Parish Council Mike Taylor, Together Against Sizewell C (TASC) Adrian Revill, Hacheston Parish Council Arthur Stansfield, Wickham Market Parish Council Edwina Galloway, Kelsale-cum-Carlton Parish Eamonn O’Nolan, Woodbridge Town Council Council John Staff, Knodishall Parish Council John Walford, Yoxford Parish Council I. Chair’s Introduction The Chair introduced himself and welcomed the attendees. The minutes of the meeting would be circulated. 1 Sizewell C Community Forum EDF Energy II. Apologies Mike Taylor noted that he was attending in place of Joan Girling, who passed on her apologies. III. Minutes of the Last Meeting The Chair proposed that the minutes of the last Forum be approved as a correct record of the meeting. The Chair’s proposal was accepted by the Forum. The minutes were therefore approved as a correct record of the previous meeting. IV. Project Update Jim Crawford reported that 2019 marked the conclusion of the formal stages of public consultation on Sizewell C. There had been nearly 10 months of formal consultations, with EDF engaging with over 10,000 local residents and stakeholders. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) would be published with the application for development consent. EDF was continuing enabling works activity. Some activities would be subject to scrutiny outside the consenting process delivered by the Planning Inspectorate, including applications for environmental permits which the the Environment Agency would have to determine(EA). There had also been the publication of the Committee on Climate Change (CCC) report on Net Zero emissions in the UK. A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) had considered a different financial model for Sizewell C and HPC. The regulated asset base model had been a success for the Thames Tideway Tunnel. The Sizewell C Development Consent Order (DCO) application would endeavour to demonstrate how EDF would mitigate the impact of construction on designated landscapes. Employment and training As well as building a sustainable, local supply chain, there was a keen focus on the people who would build Sizewell C and creating well-paid, highly-skilled jobs in the local community. Next Steps EDF would circulate a newsletter in January 2020. The DCO application would be submitted in 2020. It was anticipated that the Secretary of State for BEIS would announce a decision, with regards to the Planning Inspectorate, by late 2021. In 2020 EDF would submit applications for environmental permits to the EA. It was expected that there would be an update on the potential financing model for Sizewell C. There would be ongoing technical assessment and design works, as well as engagement with community groups and parishes. Jim Crawford thanked the Forum for participating in the consultation process. V. Stage 4 Feedback Tom McGarry recounted that the Stage 4 public consultation had focused on: • Integrated transport strategy; • Bypass of Theberton/B1122: temporary or permanent; • Additional land for wildlife mitigation; • Further details on jobs and training. The issues highlighted would be included in the Report on Consultation which would be submitted with the DCO application report. There had been: • Eight exhibitions; • 640 responses; 16 December 2019 2 Sizewell C Community Forum EDF Energy • 16 additional Stage 3 responses. Issues raised: • EIA; • Response to Stage 3 feedback; • Nuclear related issues; • Tourism; • Community impact/benefits; • Many respondents did not express views of outright support or opposition; • Environment: AONB and RSPB Minsmere. Transport Richard Bull stated that transport had been recognised as a main issue for local communities. Work would continue on proposals to reduce the road traffic impact on local communities. Many respondents continued to prefer the rail-led option. The proposed integrated option would only be accepted if the rail-led strategy was deemed to be unviable. Concerns had also been raised regarding noise impacts at night through rail transport. There had been consistent support for the two-village bypass. There had been some support for making the Sizewell link road temporary, though just as many individuals had felt it should remain as a permanent legacy. A new site layout and railhead had been proposed for the land to the east of Eastlands Industrial Estate in Leiston. Environment The introduction of additional land for marsh harriers had been welcomed. There had been a request for further detail on coastal processes. Respondents had also expressed an interest in having access to further details regarding the impacts on the marine life, which had informed EDF’s position for discounting the construction of a large jetty to import construction materials by sea. While the issue of pylons had been raised, there been no majority view on either of the proposed options. Jobs and training Few comments had been received. EDF has joined with charity partners to provide the Youth Employment Service Hub in Leiston, and it continued to develop its education strategies. Next steps involved EDF responding to the feedback within its DCO proposals, before submitting the application to the Planning Inspectorate. The Forum was presented with a video detailing the examination process for NSIPs. The video can be accessed via https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/application- process/participating-in-the-process/. VI. Q&A Peter Palmer asked why EDF had provided a disingenuous response with regards to the pylons. Jim Crawford responded that the need for the pylons had been identified through the engineering and technical work carried out. There was a technical reason driving the need for the pylons. Simon Amstutz asked if Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB could be assured that the DCO would include an assessment of the project against the defined natural beauty and special qualities elements of the AONB. Richard Bull confirmed this. 16 December 2019 3 Sizewell C Community Forum EDF Energy Stephen Brett asked Jim Crawford to clarify when EDF would submit its DCO application. Jim Crawford stated that EDF aimed to submit it in the first half of 2020. Jeff Hallett noted there had been concerns pertaining to congestion on the A12 at all levels. He asked if the DCO would include recommendations for how this could be mitigated. The villages around Wickham Market were worried about the local congestion. Richard Bull responded that the DCO would show updated traffic modelling, with the A12 being a particular area of focus. The modelling had demonstrated that traffic flows had improved following the last run of modelling. With regards to the discussions at Wickham Market, Richard Bull had been clear that EDF had presented a couple of options to deal with the traffic flow through Wickham Market. Both had received little support. EDF was happy to work with Pettistree Parish Council as well as Wickham Market Parish Council in order to devise a range of mitigation proposals. Mike Stevenson assumed that 80% of respondents had made no comments on the pylons during Stage 4. During Stage 2 Rendlesham Parish Council had been told that the layout of the structures and galleries had been determined by the regulators and could not be changed. Mike Stevenson believed that there had been a commercial decision not to underground the cables. Jim Crawford stated that while it was more expensive to underground cables; it would take up more land and require a more complex design. The technical justification would be included in the DCO application. Roy Dowding highlighted that Sizewell C had yet to obtain permission for the project to proceed. He asked why there was the need to destroy Coronation Wood. Jim Crawford replied that Coronation Wood had been a Sizewell B submission. Roy Dowding noted that Stage 3 had stated that the destruction of Coronation Wood was necessary as part of Sizewell C. Jim Crawford noted that relocated facilities had featured in the Stage 3 consultation. Tom McGarry
Recommended publications
  • Baptism Data Available

    Baptism Data Available

    Suffolk Baptisms - July 2014 Data Available Baptism Register Deanery or Grouping From To Acton, All Saints Sudbury 1754 1900 Akenham, St Mary Claydon 1754 1903 Aldeburgh, St Peter & St Paul Orford 1813 1904 Alderton, St Andrew Wilford 1754 1902 Aldham, St Mary Sudbury 1754 1902 Aldringham cum Thorpe, St Andrew Dunwich 1813 1900 Alpheton, St Peter & St Paul Sudbury 1754 1901 Alpheton, St Peter & St Paul (BTs) Sudbury 1780 1792 Ampton, St Peter Thedwastre 1754 1903 Ashbocking, All Saints Bosmere 1754 1900 Ashby, St Mary Lothingland 1813 1900 Ashfield cum Thorpe, St Mary Claydon 1754 1901 Great Ashfield, All Saints Blackbourn 1765 1901 Aspall, St Mary of Grace Hartismere 1754 1900 Assington, St Edmund Sudbury 1754 1900 Athelington, St Peter Hoxne 1754 1904 Bacton, St Mary Hartismere 1754 1901 Badingham, St John the Baptist Hoxne 1813 1900 Badley, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1902 Badwell Ash, St Mary Blackbourn 1754 1900 Bardwell, St Peter & St Paul Blackbourn 1754 1901 Barham, St Mary Claydon 1754 1901 Barking, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1900 Barnardiston, All Saints Clare 1754 1899 Barnham, St Gregory Blackbourn 1754 1812 Barningham, St Andrew Blackbourn 1754 1901 Barrow, All Saints Thingoe 1754 1900 Barsham, Holy Trinity Wangford 1813 1900 Great Barton, Holy Innocents Thedwastre 1754 1901 Barton Mills, St Mary Fordham 1754 1812 Battisford, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1899 Bawdsey, St Mary the Virgin Wilford 1754 1902 Baylham, St Peter Bosmere 1754 1900 09 July 2014 Copyright © Suffolk Family History Society 2014 Page 1 of 12 Baptism Register Deanery or Grouping
  • Bus Services Operating Through Rushmere St Andrew

    Bus Services Operating Through Rushmere St Andrew

    Bus Services operating through Rushmere St Andrew Route 4 Ipswich to Bixley Farm via Felixstowe Road & Broke Hall Operated by Ipswich Buses (Tel 0800 919390) Web: www.ipswichbuses.co.uk Buses run Mondays to Saturdays (except public holidays), in the daytime - approximately every half hour. Route: Ipswich Tower Ramparts - Ipswich Old Cattle Market Bus Station – Felixstowe Road – Broke Hall –Bixley Farm (via Foxhall Road, Broadlands Way, District Centre & Bixley Drive). Click here for timetable details. Timetable history:- 01/11/15 Route and timetable changes 11/04/16 Timetable changes 04/09/16 Minor timetable change 18/02/18 Timetable changes, route no longer serves Ipswich Railway station or Martlesham Heath Route 63 Ipswich to Framlingham via Woodbridge Road, Kesgrave, Martlesham, Woodbridge, Wickham Market & Hacheston Operated by First In Norfolk & Suffolk (Tel 01473 253800) Web: www.firstgroup.com/ukbus/suffolk_norfolk One school days journey each way. Route: Ipswich Old Cattle Market Bus Station – Woodbridge Road - Kesgrave (Main Road) – Fentons Way (4 services only) – Cambridge Road / Edmonton Close (3 services only) Martlesham Tesco - Woodbridge – Melton Chapel – Ufford – Wickham Market – Hacheston – Framlingham (Thomas Mills) All services are wheelchair and buggy-accessible. Click here for timetable details. Timetable history:- 30/08/15 Timetable changes 03/01/16 Timetable changes 27/03/16 Timetable changes 02/07/17 Extended route, now school days only – otherwise remainder within 64 service. Route 64 Ipswich to Aldeburgh via Woodbridge Road, Woodbridge, Melton, Saxmundham & Leiston Operated by First In Norfolk & Suffolk (Tel 01473 253800) Web: www.firstgroup.com/ukbus/suffolk_norfolk Buses run Mondays to Saturdays (except public holidays), in the daytime and early evening – typically every hour.
  • Rendlesham Neighbourhood Plan

    Rendlesham Neighbourhood Plan

    Rendlesham Neighbourhood Plan Rendlesham Parish Council 2014- 2027 APPENDICES (January 2015) Locality Parish Office 33 Corsham Street, Rendlesham Community Centre London N1 6DR Walnut Tree Avenue Rendlesham Opus House 0845 458 8336 Suffolk [email protected] IP12 2GG T: 01394 420207 www.locality.org.uk 01359 233663 E: [email protected] .uk All photos: ©H Heelis unless otherwise stated 2 List of Appendices Appendices: A— Village Asset Map (contained within the main Neighbourhood Plan document) B—Decision Notification Letter C— SASR Response from Natural England D—Evidence for Affordable Housing E—Policy Context F—Sport in Communities G—Listing of Assets of Community Value: Angel Theatre and Sports Centre H—Assessment of community & leisure space required in the District Centre I—Education J—Bentwaters Master Plan K—Bentwaters Airbase, former Local Plan inset map L—Suffolk Coastal Leisure Strategy M—Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty N—Summary of lost facilities/services O—Housing stock and neighbourhoods of Rendlesham P– Analysis of bus survey 3 4 Appendices 5 6 Appendix B 7 8 Appendix C 9 Appendix C 10 Appendix D Evidence for Affordable Housing Report – Full Council 3 March 2014 Consideration of Affordable Housing Scheme in Rendlesham BACKGROUND In September 2012 the Parish Council undertook a Housing Needs Survey as part of the Neighbourhood Plan process in order to identify whether there was any defined need in Rendlesham for ‘affordable’ housing for local people. The survey was undertaken by Suffolk ACRE who collated and analysed the results. Suffolk ACRE is an independent organisation and the enabling body for affordable housing schemes in Suffolk.
  • Rendlesham in Suffolk Has Identified a Major Central Place Complex of the Early–Middle Anglo-Saxon Periods

    Rendlesham in Suffolk Has Identified a Major Central Place Complex of the Early–Middle Anglo-Saxon Periods

    Social and economic complexity in early medieval England: a central place complex of the East Anglian kingdom at Rendlesham, Suffolk Christopher Scull1,FayeMinter2 & Judith Plouviez2 Fieldwork at Rendlesham in Suffolk has identified a major central place complex of the early–middle Anglo-Saxon periods. This has particular significance in the light of Bede’s eighth-century reference to a ‘royal settlement’ at Rendlesham and the princely burial site at nearby Sutton Hoo. This interim report summarises the archaeology, and considers the wider interpretative issues relating to economic complexity and social diversity. Keywords: England, Suffolk, early medieval, Anglo-Saxon Introduction The modern civil parish of Rendlesham lies on the east side of the River Deben in south-east Suffolk, about 6km north-east of the elite barrow cemetery at Sutton Hoo (Figure 1). It incorporates terrains that in the past provided a range of resources: marsh or water meadow in the valley bottom; agricultural soils on valley slopes; and interfluves that are now intensively cultivated but which in the past were heathland and sheep-walk (Williamson 2008: 29–67). The parish sits within the Sandlings of south-east Suffolk, a region of subdued topography and light sandy soils with estuarine rivers flowing into the North Sea (Young 1797;Clarke 1960: 15–19; Williamson 2008: 29–33). It has been argued that the Sandlings region 1 Department of Archaeology & Conservation, John Percival Building, Colum Drive, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK (Email: [email protected]) 2 Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service, 6 The Churchyard, Shire Hall, Bury St Edmunds IP33 1RX, UK C Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2016 ANTIQUITY 90 354 (2016): 1594–1612 doi:10.15184/aqy.2016.186 1594 Social and economic complexity in early medieval England Research Figure 1.
  • MAP BOOKLET Site Allocations and Area Specific Policies

    MAP BOOKLET Site Allocations and Area Specific Policies

    MAP BOOKLET to accompany Issues and Options consultation on Site Allocations and Area Specific Policies Local Plan Document Consultation Period 15th December 2014 - 27th February 2015 Suffolk Coastal…where quality of life counts Woodbridge Housing Market Area Housing Market Settlement/Parish Area Woodbridge Alderton, Bawdsey, Blaxhall, Boulge, Boyton, Bredfield, Bromeswell, Burgh, Butley, Campsea Ashe, Capel St Andrew, Charsfield, Chillesford, Clopton, Cretingham, Dallinghoo, Debach, Eyke, Gedgrave, Great Bealings, Hacheston, Hasketon, Hollesley, Hoo, Iken, Letheringham, Melton, Melton Park, Monewden, Orford, Otley, Pettistree, Ramsholt, Rendlesham, Shottisham, Sudbourne, Sutton, Sutton Heath, Tunstall, Ufford, Wantisden, Wickham Market, Woodbridge Settlements & Parishes with no maps Settlement/Parish No change in settlement due to: Boulge Settlement in Countryside (as defined in Policy SP19 Settlement Hierarchy) Bromeswell No Physical Limits, no defined Area to be Protected from Development (AP28) Burgh Settlement in Countryside (as defined in Policy SP19 Settlement Hierarchy) Capel St Andrew Settlement in Countryside (as defined in Policy SP19 Settlement Hierarchy) Clopton No Physical Limits, no defined Area to be Protected from Development (AP28) Dallinghoo Settlement in Countryside (as defined in Policy SP19 Settlement Hierarchy) Debach Settlement in Countryside (as defined in Policy SP19 Settlement Hierarchy) Gedgrave Settlement in Countryside (as defined in Policy SP19 Settlement Hierarchy) Great Bealings Currently working on a Neighbourhood
  • Situation of Polling Station Notice

    Situation of Polling Station Notice

    SITUATION OF POLLING STATIONS Election of Police and Crime Commissioner for Suffolk Police Area Date of Election: Thursday 6 May 2021 Hours of Poll: 7am to 10pm Notice is hereby given that: The situation of Polling Stations in East Suffolk and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: Ranges of electoral Ranges of electoral Station register numbers of Station register numbers of Situation of Polling Station Situation of Polling Station Number persons entitled to vote Number persons entitled to vote thereat thereat Fortrey Heap Village Hall The Street North NBEBA 1-418 St Lukes Church Centre Homefield Avenue NCWWC 1-1734 1 31 Cove Beccles Suffolk NR34 7PN NBENC 1-365 Lowestoft NR33 9BX NCWWS 1-1320 Public Hall Smallgate Beccles Suffolk Whitton Community Hall Hawthorn Avenue 2 NBECE 1-2026 32 NCWWE 1-809 NR34 9AD Lowestoft NR33 9BB Gunton St. Benedicts Church Hall Public Hall Smallgate Beccles Suffolk 3 NBECO 1-2062 Hollingsworth Road Lowestoft Suffolk 33 NGSGU/1 1-1366 NR34 9AD NR32 4AX Gunton St. Benedicts Church Hall St Lukes Church 61 Rigbourne Hill Beccles 4 NBEDA 1-1925 Hollingsworth Road Lowestoft Suffolk 34 NGSGU/2 1367-2581 NR34 9JQ NR32 4AX St Lukes Church 61 Rigbourne Hill Beccles Benjamin Britten Academy Blyford Road 5 NBERI 1-2039 35 NGSMC/1 1-1324 NR34 9JQ Lowestoft Suffolk NR32 4PZ Worlingham CEVCP School Garden Lane Benjamin Britten Academy Blyford Road NGSMC/2 1325-2589 6 NBEWO 1-1467 36 Worlingham Beccles Suffolk NR34 7SB Lowestoft Suffolk NR32 4PZ NGSOE 1-358 Worlingham CEVCP School Garden Lane
  • Bredfield Neighbourhood Plan

    Bredfield Neighbourhood Plan

    BREDFIELD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2018 - 2036 Bredfield Parish Council Pre-Submission Edition BREDFIELD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN [intentionally blank…] 1 BREDFIELD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Overview 1.1 Location and Description of the village 4 1.2 Why we have a Plan 4 1.3 Methodology 5 1.4 Policies and Statements of Intent 5 1.5 Consultation Period 6 1.6 Synergy: Local Plan and National Planning Policies 6 Section 2: The Vision 2.1 Vision Statement 7 2.2 Objectives of the Plan 8 Section 3: Natural Environment 3.1 Background 9 3.2 Issues 9 3.3 Objectives and Intentions 10 Section 4: Historic Environment 4.1 Background 14 4.2 Issues 14 4.3 Objectives and Intentions 15 Section 5: Community 5.1Background 16 5.2 Issues 16 5.3 Objectives and Intentions 17 Section 6: Economy: Local Business 6.1 Background 19 6.2 Issues 19 6.3 Objectives and Intentions 20 Section 7: Transport and Traffic 7.1 Background 21 7.2 Issues 21 7.3 Objectives and Intentions 22 2 BREDFIELD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Section 8: Housing 8.1 Background 25 8.2 Issues 26 8.3 Location 27 8.4 Reserve Sites 28 8.5 Objectives and Intentions 29 Section 9: Monitoring Progress 9.1 Implementation 36 9.2 Relevance 36 9.3 Updating the Plan 36 Section 10: Glossary 37 Section 11: List of Policies and Statements of Intent 38 Annexes A Historic Environment - Listed Buildings 40 B Historic Environment – Locally Valued Assets 42 C Historic Environment - The Archaeological Record 52 D Natural Environment - Wildlife Evaluation 57 E Natural Environment - Distinctive Views 60 F Natural Environment
  • SUFFOLK. [ KELLY's Smyth Lieut.-Col

    SUFFOLK. [ KELLY's Smyth Lieut.-Col

    368 WOODBRID G E. SUFFOLK. [ KELLY'S Smyth Lieut.-Col. Samuel W., V.D. Fern court, AIde- Amendment Act," John Arnott, Church street, Wood- burgh RS.O . bridge; G. A. Shipman, Quay street, Woodbridge, & Stevenson Frands Seymour esq. B.A., M.P., D.L. Play- Shuckforth Downing, Felixstowe ford Mount, near Woodbridge County Police Station, Theatre street, Alfred Hubbard, Thellusson Col. Arthur John Bethel, Thellusson lodge, superintendent; 1 sergeant & 2 constables Aldeburgh, Saxmundham Fire Brigade Station, Cumberland street, John Fosdike, Varley H. F. esq. Walton chief officer, &; 16 men Vernon-Wentworth Thomas Frederick Charles esq. Black- Inland Revenue Office, 6 Gordon villas, St. John's, Fredk. heath, Aldeburgh RS.O Robert Ellis, officer Whitbread Col. Howard C.B., D.L. Loudham park Public Lecture Hall, St. John's street, John W. Andrews, White Robart Eaton esq. Boulge hall, Woodbridge hon. sec Whitmore Wm. N. esq. Snowden hill, Wickham Market Seckford Dispensary, Seckford street, Elphinstone Hollis Wilson Frede'rick W. esq. M.P. Highrow, Fe1ixstowe R.S.O M.D., C.M. surgeon; Anthony Alfred Henley L.RC.P. Youell Edward Pitt, Beacon hill, Martlesham, Woodbridge Edin. consulting surgeon The Chairmen, for the time being, of the Woodbridge Seckford Free Library, Seckford street, Miss Harriet Urban &; Rural Councils are ex-officio magistrates Churchyard, librarian Clerk to the Magistrates, Frands John W. Wood, Seckford Hospital & Woodbridge Endowed Schools, Fras. Church street John Woodhouse Wood, clerk &; solicitor, Seckford st. Petty Sessions are held every thursday in the Woodbridge Shire hall, at 1.0 p.m. The following places are Seckford Reading Room & Social Club, Seckford street, included in the petty sessional division :-Aldeburgh, George Gough, hon.
  • Archaeology in Suffolk 1988 E. A. Martin, C

    Archaeology in Suffolk 1988 E. A. Martin, C

    ARCHAEOLOGY IN SUFFOLK 1988 compiledbyEDWARDMARTIN,COLINPENDLETONandJUDITHPLOUVIEZ ARCHAEOLOGICALFINDS This is a selection of the sites and finds discovered or reported in 1988. Information on all these has been incorporated into Suffolk County Council's Sites and Monuments Record, which is maintained by the Suffolk Archaeological Unit at Bury St Edmunds. This Record number follows the grid reference in each entry. Following requests by Metal Detector users, we have removed all grid references from entries concerning finds reported by them. We continue to be grateful to all those who contribute information for this annual list. Abbreviations: H.D.A.G. Haverhill and District Archaeological Group I.M. Ipswich Museum I.M.D.C. Ipswich Metal Detector Club M.d.f. Metal detector find M.H. Moyses Hall Museum, Bury St Edmunds S.A.U. Suffolk Archaeological Unit, Shire Hall, Bury St Edmunds (tel. Bury St Edmunds 763141 ext. 2023) Pa Palaeolithic Ro Roman Me Mesolithic Sx Saxon Ne Neolithic Md Medieval BA Bronze Age PM Post-Medieval IA Iron Age UN Period Unknown Alpheton (ALP003). Ro. Scatter of 2nd-3rd-century pottery and 3rd-4th-century coins. (I.M.D.C.). Alpheton(ALP Misc.). BA. Denariusof Titus (A.D.78-81) and silver penny of William the Lion of Scotland (1165-1214), Roxburgh mint. (M.d.f. per M.H.). Arwarton (ARW014). Ro. Scatter of metalwork, including late 2nd—mid 4th-century coins, an oval plate brooch made of gilt bronze and a Colchester-derivative brooch. (I.M.D.0 .). Arwarton (ARW022). BA. Bronze chisel, very blunt and pitted with corrosion. ?Middle Bronze Age.
  • Bredfield Neighbourhood Plan Submission Version

    Bredfield Neighbourhood Plan Submission Version

    BREDFIELD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2018 - 2036 Bredfield Parish Council Submission Edition BREDFIELD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN [intentionally blank…] 1 BREDFIELD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Overview 1.1 Location and Description of the village 4 1.2 Why we have a Plan 4 1.3 Methodology 5 1.4 Policies and Statements of Intent 5 1.5 Consultation Period 6 1.6 Synergy: Local Plan and National Planning Policies 6 Section 2: The Vision 2.1 Vision Statement 7 2.2 Objectives of the Plan 8 Section 3: Natural Environment 3.1 Background 9 3.2 Issues 10 3.3 Objectives and Intentions 11 Section 4: Historic Environment 4.1 Background 14 4.2 Issues 14 4.3 Objectives and Intentions 15 Section 5: Community 5.1Background 17 5.2 Issues 17 5.3 Objectives and Intentions 19 Section 6: Economy: Local Business 6.1 Background 20 6.2 Issues 20 6.3 Objectives and Intentions 21 Section 7: Transport and Traffic 7.1 Background 23 7.2 Issues 23 7.3 Objectives and Intentions 24 2 BREDFIELD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Section 8: Housing 8.1 Background 27 8.2 Issues 28 8.3 Location 29 8.4 Sites 30 8.5 Objectives and Intentions 31 Section 9: Monitoring Progress 9.1 Implementation 38 9.2 Relevance 38 9.3 Updating the Plan 38 Section 10: Glossary 39 Section 11: List of Policies and Statements of Intent 41 Annexes A Historic Environment - Listed Buildings 43 B Historic Environment – Locally Valued Assets 45 C Historic Environment - The Archaeological Record 55 D Natural Environment – Landscape and Wildlife 60 E Natural Environment - Distinctive Views 63 F Natural Environment
  • Supporting Evidence Melton Parish

    Supporting Evidence Melton Parish

    SUPPORTING EVIDENCE MELTON PARISH - ROAD TRANSPORT PROBLEMS THAT WILL BE EXACERBATED BY THE SIZEWELL C & FRISTON ENERGY SCHEMES V5 Introduction 1. This paper describes the background to the current heavy and growing traffic through Melton Parish. It explains that the major energy projects at Friston and Sizewell C (SZC) would hugely exacerbate the traffic volumes that cut through the middle of Melton village, causing delay to the movement of goods, services and people and creating intolerable conditions for residents. It also suggests road improvements that would benefit the region’s economy and help to safeguard the people of Melton. Melton Parish 2. Melton is a large parish, adjacent to Woodbridge and located at the first crossing point over the tidal stretch of the River Deben, at the Wilford Bridge. Melton has a healthy jobs base with several employment areas accommodating over 150 businesses. Melton’s population has seen significant growth in recent years. There are over 1,800 dwellings in Melton Parish and an estimated population of between 4,000 and 4,275. We estimate that population has grown by about 10% in the last 4 years. Many new homes have been built recently, or are planned, along Woods Lane and other stretches of the A1152. 3. A map in Appendix A shows Melton’s geographical position relative to key transport links, the Deben Peninsula and the various locations for the SZC project. Appendix B contains a detailed map of the whole of Melton Parish and is based on its 2016 Neighbourhood Plan, updated to show recent new-builds and planning applications.
  • Team Vicar in the Wilford Peninsula Team Ministry – Rendlesham Cluster PROFILE

    Team Vicar in the Wilford Peninsula Team Ministry – Rendlesham Cluster PROFILE

    Team Vicar in the Wilford Peninsula Team Ministry – Rendlesham Cluster PROFILE All Saints’, Eyke. St Edmund’s, Bromeswell “ Help us build our church at the “We are a living, heart of community.” lively church” St Gregory the Great, Rendlesham St Felix of Dunwich, Rendlesham St John the Baptist, Wantisden CONTENTS Page 1. Overview of the area and the Team Ministry 3 2. Introduction to the Rendlesham Cluster 6 3. Our villages – their localities and populations 7 4. Our church buildings 10 5. Strengths, opportunities and challenges 14 6. What are we looking for? what do we offer? 16 7. How we worship 18 8. Taizé worship 21 9. Youth, children, worship and pastoral care 22 10. The Ministry Team, Parochial Church Councils, supporting the church 24 11. Our mission and the Germinate initiative 25 12. The Vicarage 27 13. St Edmundsbury & Ipswich Diocese 28 Table 1: Existing pattern of services 31 Table 2: Parish statistics 32 2 1. OVERVIEW OF THE AREA AND THE TEAM MINISTRY Rendlesham Cluster is part of the Wilford Peninsula Team Ministry, which is the largest benefice in the Diocese of St Edmundsbury & Ipswich. The benefice is referred to as a Team Ministry throughout this profile. The Diocese is divided into Deaneries, overseen by two Archdeacons. Our Team Ministry, together with 5 other benefices which constitute the Woodbridge Deanery, lies in the eastern Archdeaconry of Suffolk. The Team Ministry has 17 parishes and 18 church buildings, a population of 8,500 and covers an area some 10 miles by 14 miles. Suffolk Coastal District Council is the local authority covering the area, almost all of which falls within a designated Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).