Palaeo-Electronica.Org
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Synchytrium Endobioticum (Schilb.) Percival Pest Risk Assessment for Oregon
Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Percival Pest Risk Assessment for Oregon This pest risk assessment follows the format used by the Exotic Forest Pest Information System for North America. For a description of the evaluation process used, see http://spfnic.fs.fed.us/exfor/download.cfm. IDENTITY Name: Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Percival Taxonomic Position: Chytridiales: Synchytriaceae Common Name: Potato wart disease RISK RATING SUMMARY Numerical Score: 6 Relative Risk Rating: HIGH Uncertainty: Very Certain Uncertainty in this assessment results from: Potato wart has been extensively studied in the countries in which it is established. RISK RATING DETAILS Establishment potential is HIGH Justification: Potato wart is apparently native to the Andes Mountains and has subsequently been spread throughout the world through the movement of infected or contaminated tubers. It has become successfully established in several countries in Europe, Asia, Africa, North America, South America, and Oceania. Previous detections in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia had reportedly been eradicated by 1974, although surveys conducted in Maryland revealed the presence of resting spores of the pathogen were still present in one home garden. The spores were reportedly non-viable. Spread potential is MODERATE Justification: Potato wart has been spread throughout the world through the movement of infested tubers. Local spread is primarily through the movement of contaminated soil on equipment, vehicle tires, tubers, and plants. Spores may also be spread by wind. Symptoms in the field may not manifest until after repeated cultivation of susceptible hosts within a field or garden. Infected tubers may not manifest symptoms until in storage; however, meristematic tissue (sprouts) may be so severely affected plants will not emerge from infected seed tubers. -
Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry. -
Synchytrium-2
Synchytrium: Synchytrium is represented by about 200 species reported from all over the world, occurs as parasite on aquatic alga, bryophytes (mosses), pteridophytes (ferns) and mostly on flowering plants. About 80 species have been reported from India, of which S. rytzii on the members of Lamiaceae, S. trichosanthoides and S. laginariae on the members of Cucurbitaceae, S. taraxicola on Taraxacum officinale, S. sisamicola on Sesamum indicum and S. endobioticum is a well-known species which causes wart disease or black wart of potato, available in the main potato growing regions of the world, mostly in mountains with moist and cold climate. In India, this disease was first recorded at Rangbul in Darjeeling district of West Bengal in 1953. Symptoms of Disease Caused by Synchytrium: The disease is characterised by cauliflower-like black warty growth on tubers (Fig. 4.16), stolons and stem bases (Fig. 4.15). Sometimes, the size of the warts is more than the size of the tuber. Life History of Synchytrium: The life history of the most common species i.e., S. endobioticum has been studied by Miss K. M. Curtis, 1921; followed by Kohler (1923, 1931). The representation of the life cycle has been given in the Fig. 4.17. Vegetative Structure of Synchytrium: The vegetative body of Synchytrium consists of minute endobiotic holocarpic thallus, represented by naked uniflagellate zoospore with whiplash flagellum. Reproduction in Synchytrium: Synchytrium endobioticum reproduces both asexually and sexually. Vegetative reproduction is absent. During reproduction, the entire thallus transforms into a reproductive unit i.e., holocarpic. 1. Asexual Reproduction: Asexual reproduction generally occurs during favourable condition, i.e., in spring season. -
Causal Organism of Black Wart Disease of Potato)
Online class- TDC Part I Date-19.4.21 Synchytrium (Causal Organism of Black Wart Disease of Potato) Classification- (Alexpoulos and Mims,1979) Division- Mycota Sub division- Eumycotina Class- - Chytridiomycetes Order- Chytridiales Family- Synchytriaceae Genus- Synchytrium Species- endobioticum Synchytrium is a soil borne fungus which do not possess mycelium and is designated as holocarpic. It is placed under the order Chytridiales, series Uniflagellatae of Class Phycomycetes (Lower fungi) as classified by Sparrow (1960). It is worldwide in distribution, occurring in tropical, temperate and arctic zones. It has been found present even at higher altitudes of above 11000 ft. All the species are parasitic and infect algae, mosses, ferns and most commonly flowering plants. It causes Black wart disease in Potato. As a result potato tubers are affected and become malformed due to formation of warts on them. There are 200 species of Synchytrium, but about 60 species have been reported from India. The most common species is S. endobioticum, well known for disease on potato. It mainly infects solanaceous plants. Some important species are S. anemones; S.cajani; S.phaseoli-radiati; S. cyperi; S. fistulosus; S. luffae; S. indicum; S.meliloti etc. Somatic structure- The body of the fungus is composed of a single uninucleate cell with definite cell wall. The fungus resides in the potato tuber in most part of its life cycle and produces many uniflagellate motile zoospores. These zoospores are the carrier of fresh infection in healthy tubers. The fungus induces the host tissue to multiply in number and to grow in size. Due to this, many warts develop in the tubers; hence the disease is known as wart disease. -
Biology of Fungi, Lecture 2: the Diversity of Fungi and Fungus-Like Organisms
Biology of Fungi, Lecture 2: The Diversity of Fungi and Fungus-Like Organisms Terms You Should Understand u ‘Fungus’ (pl., fungi) is a taxonomic term and does not refer to morphology u ‘Mold’ is a morphological term referring to a filamentous (multicellular) condition u ‘Mildew’ is a term that refers to a particular type of mold u ‘Yeast’ is a morphological term referring to a unicellular condition Special Lecture Notes on Fungal Taxonomy u Fungal taxonomy is constantly in flux u Not one taxonomic scheme will be agreed upon by all mycologists u Classical fungal taxonomy was based primarily upon morphological features u Contemporary fungal taxonomy is based upon phylogenetic relationships Fungi in a Broad Sense u Mycologists have traditionally studied a diverse number of organisms, many not true fungi, but fungal-like in their appearance, physiology, or life style u At one point, these fungal-like microbes included the Actinomycetes, due to their filamentous growth patterns, but today are known as Gram-positive bacteria u The types of organisms mycologists have traditionally studied are now divided based upon phylogenetic relationships u These relationships are: Q Kingdom Fungi - true fungi Q Kingdom Straminipila - “water molds” Q Kingdom Mycetozoa - “slime molds” u Kingdom Fungi (Mycota) Q Phylum: Chytridiomycota Q Phylum: Zygomycota Q Phylum: Glomeromycota Q Phylum: Ascomycota Q Phylum: Basidiomycota Q Form-Phylum: Deuteromycota (Fungi Imperfecti) Page 1 of 16 Biology of Fungi Lecture 2: Diversity of Fungi u Kingdom Straminiplia (Chromista) -
The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231610049 The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes Article in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · September 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 961 2,825 25 authors, including: Sina M Adl Alastair Simpson University of Saskatchewan Dalhousie University 118 PUBLICATIONS 8,522 CITATIONS 264 PUBLICATIONS 10,739 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Christopher E Lane David Bass University of Rhode Island Natural History Museum, London 82 PUBLICATIONS 6,233 CITATIONS 464 PUBLICATIONS 7,765 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Biodiversity and ecology of soil taste amoeba View project Predator control of diversity View project All content following this page was uploaded by Smirnov Alexey on 25 October 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Journal of Published by the International Society of Eukaryotic Microbiology Protistologists J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 59(5), 2012 pp. 429–493 © 2012 The Author(s) Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology © 2012 International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes SINA M. ADL,a,b ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,b CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,c JULIUS LUKESˇ,d DAVID BASS,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f MATTHEW W. BROWN,g FABIEN BURKI,h MICAH DUNTHORN,i VLADIMIR HAMPL,j AARON HEISS,b MONA HOPPENRATH,k ENRIQUE LARA,l LINE LE GALL,m DENIS H. LYNN,n,1 HILARY MCMANUS,o EDWARD A. D. -
Fungal Phyla
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Sydowia Jahr/Year: 1984 Band/Volume: 37 Autor(en)/Author(s): Arx Josef Adolf, von Artikel/Article: Fungal phyla. 1-5 ©Verlag Ferdinand Berger & Söhne Ges.m.b.H., Horn, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Fungal phyla J. A. von ARX Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, P. O. B. 273, NL-3740 AG Baarn, The Netherlands 40 years ago I learned from my teacher E. GÄUMANN at Zürich, that the fungi represent a monophyletic group of plants which have algal ancestors. The Myxomycetes were excluded from the fungi and grouped with the amoebae. GÄUMANN (1964) and KREISEL (1969) excluded the Oomycetes from the Mycota and connected them with the golden and brown algae. One of the first taxonomist to consider the fungi to represent several phyla (divisions with unknown ancestors) was WHITTAKER (1969). He distinguished phyla such as Myxomycota, Chytridiomycota, Zygomy- cota, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. He also connected the Oomycota with the Pyrrophyta — Chrysophyta —• Phaeophyta. The classification proposed by WHITTAKER in the meanwhile is accepted, e. g. by MÜLLER & LOEFFLER (1982) in the newest edition of their text-book "Mykologie". The oldest fungal preparation I have seen came from fossil plant material from the Carboniferous Period and was about 300 million years old. The structures could not be identified, and may have been an ascomycete or a basidiomycete. It must have been a parasite, because some deformations had been caused, and it may have been an ancestor of Taphrina (Ascomycota) or of Milesina (Uredinales, Basidiomycota). -
Parasitic Fungi of Phytoplankton: Ecological Roles and Implications for Microbial Food Webs
Vol. 62: 123–137, 2011 AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Published online January 19 doi: 10.3354/ame01448 Aquat Microb Ecol REVIEW Parasitic fungi of phytoplankton: ecological roles and implications for microbial food webs Serena Rasconi, Marlène Jobard, Télesphore Sime-Ngando* LMGE, Laboratoire Microorganismes: Génome & Environnement, UMR CNRS 6023, Clermont Université, Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand II, 63177 Aubière Cedex, France ABSTRACT: Microbial parasites typically are characterized by their small size, short generation time, and high rates of reproduction, with a simple life cycle occurring generally within a single host. They are diverse and ubiquitous in aquatic ecosystems, comprising viruses, prokaryotes, and eukaryotes. Recently, environmental 18S rDNA surveys of microbial eukaryotes have unveiled major infecting agents in pelagic systems, consisting primarily of chytrids (Chytridiomycota). Chytrids are external eucarpic parasites that infect diverse prokaryotic and eukaryotic algae, primarily diatoms and fila- mentous species. They produce specialized rhizoidal systems within host cells, i.e. the nutrient con- veying system for the formation of fruit bodies (sporangia) from which propagules (motile uniflagel- lated zoospores) are released into the environment. In this review, we summarize the ecological potential of parasites of phytoplankton and infer the implications for food web dynamics. We focus on chytrids, together with other parasitic eukaryotes, with special emphasis on (1) the role of micropar- asites in driving the structure of phytoplankton communities, (2) the role of chytrid zoospores in mat- ter and energy transfer, and (3) the potential consequences of infections for food web dynamics. We raise the question of genetic potential from host–parasite interactions and also of how environmental factors might affect the host–parasite relationships in the pelagic realm. -
1993 Li, Heath and Packer.Pdf
The phylogenetic relationships of the anaerobic chytridiomycetous gut fungi (Neocallimasticaceae) and the Chytridiornycota. 11. Cladistic analysis of structural data and description of Neocallimasticales ord.nov. JINLIANCLI, I. BRENTHEATH,] AND LAURENCEPACKER Dep(~rittiet~tof Biology, York Utliversity, North York, Otzt., Cotzodc~M3J IP3 Receivcd May 15, 1992 LI, J., HEATH,I. B., and PACKER,L. 1993. The phylogenetic relationships of the anaerobic chytridiomycetous gut fungi (Neocallimasticaceae) and the Chytridiornycota. 11. Cladistic analysis of structural data and description of Neocalli- masticales ord.nov. Can. J. Bot. 71: 393-407. We investigated the phylogenetic relationships of thc Chytridiomycota and the chytridiomycetous gut fungi with a cladistic analysis of42 morphological, ultrastructural, and mitotic characters for 38 taxa using both maximum parsimony and distance algorithms. Our analyses show that there are three major clades within the Chytridiomycota: the gut fungi, thc Blastocladiales, and the Spizellomycetales-Chytridialcs- Monoblepharidales. Conscqucntly. we elevated the gut fungi to the order Neocallimasticales ord.nov. Our results suggest that a modified Chytridiales, including the Monoblepharidales. is a monophyletic group. In contrast the Spizellomycetales are paraphyletic because the Chytridiales arose within them. The separation of the traditional Chytridiales into two orders is thus doubtful. Although the Blastocladiales are closer to members of the Spizellomycetales than the Chytridiales, the cladistic analyses of both structural and rRNA sequence data do not support the idea that the Blastocladiales were derived from the Spizellomycetales. We suggest emendations to the classification of the Chytridiomycota and note which groupings require further analysis. Our phylogeny for the currently recognized species of gut fungi is inconsis- tent with the existing classification. -
Synchytrium Endobioticum – Pathotypes, Resistance of Solanum Tuberosum and Management
Unit for Risk Assessment of Plant Pests REPORT SLU ua 2018.2.6-1762 21/9/2018 Synchytrium endobioticum – pathotypes, resistance of Solanum tuberosum and management Mailing address: Niklas Björklund, Dept. of Ecology, Box 7044 / E-mail / Phone: Johanna Boberg, Dept. of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Box 7026, SLU, 750 07 Uppsala Street address: Ulls Väg 16 / Almas Allé 5, Uppsala [email protected], +46 (0)18-67 28 79 Org nr: 202100-2817 [email protected], +46 (0)18- 67 18 04 www.slu.se Synchytrium endobioticum – pathotypes, resistance of Solanum tuberosum and management Content Summary .................................................................................................................... 3 Background and assignment ...................................................................................... 4 Description of Synchytrium endobioticum................................................................. 4 Life cycle .............................................................................................................. 4 Geographical distribution ..................................................................................... 5 Different pathotypes ............................................................................................. 5 Synchytrium endobioticum in Sweden .................................................................. 7 Genetic components of virulence ......................................................................... 8 Recent progress of detection and diagnostic -
Clade (Kingdom Fungi, Phylum Chytridiomycota)
TAXONOMIC STATUS OF GENERA IN THE “NOWAKOWSKIELLA” CLADE (KINGDOM FUNGI, PHYLUM CHYTRIDIOMYCOTA): PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF MOLECULAR CHARACTERS WITH A REVIEW OF DESCRIBED SPECIES by SHARON ELIZABETH MOZLEY (Under the Direction of David Porter) ABSTRACT Chytrid fungi represent the earliest group of fungi to have emerged within the Kingdom Fungi. Unfortunately despite the importance of chytrids to understanding fungal evolution, the systematics of the group is in disarray and in desperate need of revision. Funding by the NSF PEET program has provided an opportunity to revise the systematics of chytrid fungi with an initial focus on four specific clades in the order Chytridiales. The “Nowakowskiella” clade was chosen as a test group for comparing molecular methods of phylogenetic reconstruction with the more traditional morphological and developmental character system used for classification in determining generic limits for chytrid genera. Portions of the 18S and 28S nrDNA genes were sequenced for isolates identified to genus level based on morphology to seven genera in the “Nowakowskiella” clade: Allochytridium, Catenochytridium, Cladochytrium, Endochytrium, Nephrochytrium, Nowakowskiella, and Septochytrium. Bayesian, parsimony, and maximum likelihood methods of phylogenetic inference were used to produce trees based on one (18S or 28S alone) and two-gene datasets in order to see if there would be a difference depending on which optimality criterion was used and the number of genes included. In addition to the molecular analysis, taxonomic summaries of all seven genera covering all validly published species with a listing of synonyms and questionable species is provided to give a better idea of what has been described and the morphological and developmental characters used to circumscribe each genus. -
Ohne Gattungen Mit Hypogäischen Fruchtkörpern)
Pilzgattungen Europas - Liste 14: Notizbuchartige Auflistung der Chytridiomyceten, Zygomyceten und verwandter Gruppen (ohne Gattungen mit hypogäischen Fruchtkörpern) Bernhard Oertel INRES Universität Bonn Auf dem Hügel 6 D-53121 Bonn E-mail: [email protected] 24.06.2011 Die Gattungen mit großen hypogäischen Fruchtkörpern sind mit in der Datei mit Hypogäen der Glomero- und Zygomyceten und die Protozoen-artigen Gruppen der Ichthyosporea sind in der Protozoen-Datei untergebracht; s.a. die Microsporidia-Datei Phylum Archemycota, Niedere Mycobionta [Chytridiomycota/ Archemycota/ Zygomycota] [Niedere, echte Pilze (Fungi); niedere Eumycota] Hier sind auch die Eccrinales untergebracht worden Bestimmung der großen Pilzgruppen: Ainsworth (1973), The Fungi 4A, 4-7 Gattungen 1) Hauptliste 2) Liste der heute nicht mehr gebräuchlichen Gattungsnamen (Anhang) 1) Hauptliste Absidia Tiegh. 1876 (= Mycocladus) (vgl. Lentamyces): Typus: A. reflexa Tiegh. Lebensweise: Z.T. humanpathogen Bestimm. d. Gatt.: Domsch, Gams u. Anderson (2007), 10; Hesseltine u. Ellis in Ainsworth et al. (1973), 213; Petrini u. Petrini (2010), 48; Samson et al. (2010), 31 u. 36 Abb.: Crous et al. (2009), 28; Samson et al. (2010), 39 Erstbeschr.(ersatzweise): Fischer, A. (1892), in Rabenhorst 1/4, 237; Schröter in Engler u. Prantl (1897), 126 Lit.: Domsch, Gams u. Anderson (2007), 25 Ellis, J.J. u. C.W. Hesseltine (1965), The genus Absidia ..., Mycologia 57, 222-235 u. (1966), Species of Absidia ..., Sabouraudia 5, 59-77 Fischer, A. (1892), in Rabenhorst 1/4, 237 Fuller (1978), 121 Hesseltine, C.W. u. J.J. Ellis (1964), The genus Absidia ..., Mycologia 56, 568-601; (1966), Species of Absidia ..., ibid. 58, 761-785 Mulenko, Majewski u. Ruszkiewicz-Michalska (2008), 85 u.