DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Reliefweb

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of Reliefweb Evaluation of ReliefWeb http://www.reliefweb.int Prepared for Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, United Nations By Forum One Communications Chris Wolz Nam-ho Park 2006 The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, with the exception of Appendix H: Management Response Matrix Table of Contents Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................3 1. Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................4 1.1 Background .........................................................................................................................................4 1.2 Evaluation Approach ...........................................................................................................................5 1.3 Users and Usage ................................................................................................................................5 1.4 Products and Services ........................................................................................................................6 1.5 User Perceptions of ReliefWeb Quality...............................................................................................7 1.6 Partnerships ........................................................................................................................................7 1.7 OCHA, ReliefWeb and Other Online Services....................................................................................8 1.8 Management .......................................................................................................................................8 1.9 Mandate and Mission ..........................................................................................................................9 1.10 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................9 2. Introduction to the Evaluation..............................................................................................................12 2.1 ReliefWeb History .............................................................................................................................12 2.2 Evaluation Purpose and Context.......................................................................................................12 2.3 Evaluation Team ...............................................................................................................................13 3. Methodology........................................................................................................................................14 3.1 Scope of the Evaluation ....................................................................................................................14 3.2 Research Approach ..........................................................................................................................14 3.3 Analytic Approach .............................................................................................................................15 3.4 Stakeholders .....................................................................................................................................16 4. ReliefWeb Usage ................................................................................................................................18 4.1 Key Questions...................................................................................................................................18 4.2 ReliefWeb Users ...............................................................................................................................18 4.3 Usage of ReliefWeb ..........................................................................................................................23 4.4 ReliefWeb Products and Services ....................................................................................................27 4.5 ReliefWeb Coverage .........................................................................................................................36 4.6 Conclusion.........................................................................................................................................38 5. User Perceptions of ReliefWeb Quality...............................................................................................40 5.1 Key Questions...................................................................................................................................40 5.2 Credibility, Reliability, and Neutrality.................................................................................................40 5.3 Timeliness .........................................................................................................................................41 5.4 Independence....................................................................................................................................42 5.5 Representativeness ..........................................................................................................................44 5.6 Conclusion.........................................................................................................................................45 6. User Experience..................................................................................................................................46 6.1 Key Questions...................................................................................................................................46 6.2 Usability of ReliefWeb Services ........................................................................................................46 6.3 Access to ReliefWeb .........................................................................................................................47 6.4 Information Architecture ....................................................................................................................48 6.5 Conclusion.........................................................................................................................................48 7. Partnerships ........................................................................................................................................49 7.1 Key Questions...................................................................................................................................49 7.2 Current Partner Participation.............................................................................................................49 7.3 Partner Content Posting Process......................................................................................................50 7.4 Content Sharing Standards...............................................................................................................51 7.5 Partner Perceptions of Value ............................................................................................................53 7.6 Expanding Partner Participation........................................................................................................53 7.7 Conclusion.........................................................................................................................................55 8. OCHA and ReliefWeb .........................................................................................................................56 8.1 Key Questions...................................................................................................................................56 8.2 OCHA Use of ReliefWeb...................................................................................................................56 8.3 OCHA Contributions to ReliefWeb....................................................................................................56 8.4 ReliefWeb and OCHA’s Mission .......................................................................................................57 8.5 Conclusion.........................................................................................................................................57 9. ReliefWeb and Other Online Services ................................................................................................58 9.1 Key Questions...................................................................................................................................58 9.2 Other Online Services: Coverage and Cooperation..........................................................................58 9.3 Conclusion.........................................................................................................................................61 10. Management .......................................................................................................................................62 10.1 Key Questions.................................................................................................................................62 10.2 ReliefWeb Staffing ..........................................................................................................................62 10.3 ReliefWeb
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COVID-19 Global Humanitarian Response Plan (GHRP)
    GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE PLAN COVID-19 UNITED NATIONS COORDINATED APPEAL APRIL – DECEMBER 2020 GHRP MAY UPDATE GLOBAL HRP FOR COVID-19: MAY UPDATE 2 Contents 03 Foreword 04 At a glance Financial requirements Key achievements 09 Introduction 11 Objectives, scope and countries included 1.1 Objectives and scope 1.2 Countries included 1.3 Forward-looking risk analysis at country level 20 Humanitarian situation and needs analysis 2.1 Update on the public health impact of COVID-19 2.2 Update on the socio-economic impact of COVID-19 2.3 Most affected population groups 46 Progress of the response 3.1 Progress of the response against the strategic priorities and specific objectives 3.2 Adherence to the guiding principles and key considerations for the response 68 Financial requirements and funding status 4.1 Funding overview 4.2 Financial requirements 4.3 Funding status 4.4 Funding flows and requirements Annexes A Response progress by strategic priority and specific objective B Response progress by IASC organisations and partners C Country and regional plans: situation and needs, response planning and requirements D Provisional Sector Breakdown This publication was produced by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in collaboration with humanitarian partners across the world. OCHA thanks all organizations, partners and donors that contributed to the Global Humanitarian Response Plan for COVID-19 and that regularly report to the Financial Tracking Service (FTS). Last update: 7 May 2020 Front cover A volunteer working with the Emissa organization in Idleb raises awareness of COVID-19 at the Abnaa Mhin IDP camp, home to over 1,800 internally displaced families.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Information and Analysis in Humanitarian Emergencies Evidence from Kenya
    APRIL 2020 The Politics of Information and Analysis in Humanitarian Emergencies Evidence from Kenya A FEINSTEIN INTERNATIONAL CENTER PUBLICATION Daniel Maxwell, Peter Hailey, Lindsay Spainhour Baker, and Stephen Odhiambo FRIEDMAN SCHOOL OF NUTRITION SCIENCE AND POLICY FeinsteinThe Politics of Information and Analysis in Humanitarian Emergencies: Evidence from Kenya 1 International Center Cover photo: Joyce Maxwell Citation: Daniel Maxwell, Peter Hailey, Lindsay Spainhour Baker, and Stephen Odhiambo. “The Politics of Information and Analysis in Humanitarian Emergencies: Evidence from Kenya.” Boston: Feinstein International Center, Tufts University, 2020. Corresponding author: Daniel Maxwell Corresponding author email: [email protected] Photo credits: Joyce Maxwell Copyright 2020 Tufts University, all rights reserved. “Tufts University” is a registered trademark and may not be reproduced apart from its inclusion in this work without permission from its owner. Feinstein International Center, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy Tufts University 75 Kneeland Street, 8th Floor Boston, MA 02111 USA Tel: +1 617.627.3423 Twitter: @FeinsteinIntCen fic.tufts.edu 2 fic.tufts.edu Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the financial support of the DFID/East Africa Research Fund (EARF) for this study, the Feinstein International Center and the Centre for Human- itarian Change for their logistical support, and the efforts of the internal review commit- tee at EARF as well as two external reviewers for their feedback. We are grateful to Joyce Maxwell for copy editing. This document is an output from a project funded by the UK Department for Internation- al Development (DFID) through the Research for Evidence Division (RED) for the benefit of developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Displaced in Darfur 1
    Displaced in Darfur 1 Displaced in Darfur: An Analysis of Humanitarian and Protection Operations for the Internally Displaced in Darfur By Trish Chang 1 KAIPTC Paper No. 18, June 2007 1 Trish Chang is a Research Associate at the Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre in Accra, Ghana. Displaced in Darfur 2 Table Of Contents List of Acronyms Used ...................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 Aim & Scope ...............................................................................................................4 Who are IDPs? ............................................................................................................5 ‘Involuntary’ ...............................................................................................................5 ‘Internal’ ....................................................................................................................6 II. The Internally Displaced: The Quest For Protection ............................................... 8 History of Protection ..................................................................................................8 The Guiding Principles ................................................................................................8 The Guiding Principles Today: A Lukewarm success ................................................10 III. Darfur
    [Show full text]
  • Global Humanitarian Response Plan for COVID-19
    GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE PLAN COVID-19 UNITED NATIONS COORDINATED APPEAL APRIL – DECEMBER 2020 GHRP JULY UPDATE GLOBAL HRP FOR COVID-19: JULY UPDATE 2 Contents 03 Foreword 04 At a glance Financial requirements Key achievements 12 Introduction 13 Objectives, scope and countries included 1.1 Objectives of the July update of the GHRP 1.2 Scope of the third GHRP update 1.3 Countries included in the July update of the GHRP 1.4 Forward-looking risk analysis approaches 22 Humanitarian situation and needs analysis 2.1 Evolution on the public health impact of COVID-19 2.2 Evolution on the socio-economic impact of COVID-19 2.3 Most affected population groups 65 Progress of the response against the strategic priorities and specific objectives 3.1 Progress on Strategic Priority 1 3.2 Progress on Strategic Priority 2 3.3 Progress on Strategic Priority 3 3.4 Adherence to the guiding principles and key considerations for the response 95 Financial requirements and funding status 4.1 Overview of global appeals for COVID-19 4.2 Financial requirements at country level 4.3 Funding required for the GHRP 4.4 Funding received against the GHRP requirements and impact of gaps 4.5 Funding flows and partnership Annexes I Country and regional plans: situation and needs, response planning and requirements II Summary of reponse progress by specific objectives and by agency This publication was produced by the United Nations UNICEF closely works with the Government and its The designations employed and the presentation Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs partners to step up the response and prevent further of material in this publication do not imply the (OCHA) in collaboration with humanitarian partners proliferation of the COVID-19 virus in the country, expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of across the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Humanitarian Terms
    Glossary of Humanitarian Terms ReliefWeb Project www.reliefweb.int/glossaries Draft Version | August 2008 RELIEFWEB GLOSSARY OF HUMANITARIAN TERMS The terms and definitions in this glossary have been compiled from existing glossaries and other reference material available to the public, with a focus on their common usage and understanding within a humanitarian context, particularly as relating to natural disasters, complex emergencies and disaster risk reduction. ReliefWeb has not created or modified any of the definitions. As such, the definitions provided do not necessarily reflect the position of the United Nations or its Member States. Index of Terms A Acceleration Acceptable Risk Accountability Adaptation Advocacy Aftershock Agenda for Protection Alert Amnesty Arbitration Armed Conflict - International armed conflict - Non-international armed conflict Armed Group Arms Control Arms Embargo Assessment Assistance Asylum Asylum-Seeker Avalanche B Bilateral Aid/ Assistance Biological Disaster Biological Hazard Biological Weapons C Capacity Capacity Building 1 RELIEFWEB GLOSSARY OF HUMANITARIAN TERMS, Continued Index of Terms C Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) Chemical Accident Chemical Weapons Child Soldier Civil Defence Civil Military Coordination (CMCoord) Civil Society Civil War Civilian Personnel Civilian Populations Climate Change Closed Camp Cluster Cluster Approach Cluster Bombs Cluster Leads CNN Factor Code of Conduct Coercion Co-Existence Cold Wave Combatant Common Country Assessment (CCA) Common Humanitarian Action Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Scorched Earth, Poisoned Air Sudanese Government Forces Ravage Jebel Marra, Darfur
    SCORCHED EARTH, POISONED AIR SUDANESE GOVERNMENT FORCES RAVAGE JEBEL MARRA, DARFUR 1 Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2016 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: Bourgu village, 8 April 2016. (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. ©DigitalGlobe, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in September 2016 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: AFR 54/4877/2016 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 2. METHODOLOGY 7 3. BACKGROUND 10 3.1 JEBEL MARRA, DARFUR 10 3.2 THE CURRENT CONFLICT IN DARFUR 11 3.3 THE PARTIES TO THE CONFLICT 12 3.4 THE INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE TO THE CONFLICT 13 4. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ANALYSIS 16 4.1 WAR CRIMES 16 4.2 CHEMICAL WEAPONS 17 4.3 CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY 18 4.4 OBLIGATION TO INVESTIGATE AND PROSECUTE 19 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Humanitarian Terms
    Glossary of Humanitarian Terms ReliefWeb Project www.reliefweb.int/glossaries August 2008 RELIEFWEB GLOSSARY OF HUMANITARIAN TERMS The terms and definitions in this glossary have been compiled from existing glossaries and other reference material available to the public, with a focus on their common usage and understanding within a humanitarian context, particularly as relating to natural disasters, complex emergencies and disaster risk reduction. ReliefWeb has not created or modified any of the definitions. As such, the definitions provided do not necessarily reflect the position of the United Nations or its Member States. Index of Terms A Acceleration ......................................................................................................................................9 Acceptable Risk................................................................................................................................9 Accountability....................................................................................................................................9 Adaptation.........................................................................................................................................9 Advocacy ..........................................................................................................................................9 Aftershock.........................................................................................................................................9 Agenda for Protection.......................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Issue
    The magazine of the Humanitarian Practice Network March 2003 23 IN THIS ISSUE EDITORIAL Humanitarian protection Everyone (more-or-less) agrees that the aim of humanitarian assistance is to help Iraq: protection, legitimacy and the 2 people survive conflicts and disasters by ensuring essential support. In armed use of armed force conflict, people face many threats: of violence, of being forced from their homes, of being denied access to relief. Often it is precisely these ‘protection’issues that lie Afghanistan: a case study in refugee 4 behind the need for relief intervention. Yet it is unclear what this means in return and protection practice. The ‘failure to protect’is a charge that can be levelled at the state, the Bosnia: protection in conflict and 7 international community or at humanitarian agencies; in each case, however, peacebuilding something different is implied. Access to protect 9 NGOs in refugee protection: an 12 International humanitarian law provides a framework and range of instruments to unrecognised resource help protect people during conflicts. However, the way wars are now fought, with attacks on civilians often a deliberate strategy rather than a side-effect, puts civilian What does humanitarian protection 15 populations at far greater risk.The political and military interventions in Kosovo really mean? and Afghanistan, and now also in Iraq, have been justified by those undertaking them at least partly on humanitarian grounds; but many believe that this merging of political and humanitarian agendas further complicates the protection of people Practice and policy notes against threats to their security. ‘New variant famine’: hypothesis, 20 evidence and implications Humanitarian protection is the subject of the special feature of this issue of The food emergency in Ethiopia: 22 Humanitarian Exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting in Complex Emergencies: Darfur Case Study
    Targeting in Complex Emergencies: Darfur Case Study Helen Young and Daniel Maxwell April 2009 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................................... iii Prologue.......................................................................................................................................................................iv Acronyms......................................................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................................vi I. Introduction and Background ................................................................................................................................1 Background to the conflict........................................................................................................................................1 Peace processes, ongoing conflict, and the ICC...................................................................................................3 The WFP in Darfur ...................................................................................................................................................5 Overview of report....................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Two Million Internally Displaced: the Successes and Shortcomings of the African Union in Darfur
    The Brookings Institution—University of Bern Project on Internal Displacement Protecting Two Million Internally Displaced: The Successes and Shortcomings of the African Union in Darfur by William G. O’Neill and Violette Cassis An Occasional Paper November 2005 Protecting Two Million Internally Displaced: The Successes and Shortcomings of the African Union in Darfur by William G. O’Neill and Violette Cassis THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION – UNIVERSITY OF BERN PROJECT ON INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20036-2188 TELEPHONE: 202/797-6168 FAX: 202/797-6003 EMAIL: [email protected] www.brookings.edu/idp FOREWORD The two million men, women and children crammed into displaced persons’ camps in Darfur, Sudan often look to the forces of the African Union (AU) for protection against the attacks and violence to which they are so regularly subjected To assess how effectively the AU is providing protection, our Project contracted with William G. O’Neill and Violette Cassis, who offer in their report a first hand account of the successes and shortcomings of the AU’s intervention in Darfur. Based on interviews with AU troops, internally displaced persons and human rights and humanitarian personnel over a 7-month period, their report analyzes best practices as well as the limitations of the AU performance and comes up with a series of recommendations to reinforce the AU’s capacity. We consider the recommendations important not only for Darfur but for the AU’s potential role in other conflicts in Africa where international reinforcements may not be available and where the number, quality and mandate of AU troops may be limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook for Rcs and Hcs on Emergency Preparedness and Response This Handbook Was Developed by the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) HC Group
    Handbook for RCs and HCs on Emergency Preparedness and Response This handbook was developed by the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) HC Group. The IASC was established in 1992 in response to United Nations General Assembly Resolution 46/182 that called for strengthened coordination of humanitarian assistance. In 1993, the General Assembly, through Resolution 48/57, affirmed IASC’s role as the primary mechanism for inter-agency coordination of humanitarian assistance. A broad range of UN and non-UN humanitarian partners participate in this Standing Committee. This handbook can be downloaded from the IASC website at : http ://www.humanitarianinfo.org/iasc © Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) 2010. Cover page photos: © UN Photo/Tim McKulka Suggested citation : Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) (2010). Handbook for RCs and HCs on Emergency Preparedness and Response. Geneva : IASC. This handbook and the checklist will be revised and updated on a regular basis. Feedback and comments are therefore welcome, and should be sent to: [email protected] OCHA would like to express its gratitude for the financial support of the European Commission and its Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection department (ECHO). Handbook for RCs and HCs on Emergency Preparedness and Response Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 International humanitarian coordination architecture 1 Guiding principles 4 Accountability 5 Support 5 I. DISASTER RISK REDUCTION 7 1. Lead and coordinate efforts to strengthen country-level commitment to and capacities for disaster risk reduction 7 National Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction 9 Strategic National Action Plan (SNAP) for Disaster Risk Reduction 10 National Matrix of Commitment and Initiatives in support of the HFA 11 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Locust Crisis Appeal, January 2020–December 2021: Revised Appeal for Sustaining Control Efforts and Protecting Livelihoods (Six-Month Extension)
    Greater Horn of Africa and Yemen Desert locust crisis appeal January 2020–December 2021 Revised appeal for sustaining control efforts and protecting livelihoods (six-month extension) Greater Horn of Africa and Yemen Desert locust crisis appeal January 2020–December 2021 Revised appeal for sustaining control efforts and protecting livelihoods (six-month extension) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2021 REQUIRED CITATION FAO. 2021. Greater Horn of Africa and Yemen – Desert locust crisis appeal, January 2020–December 2021: Revised appeal for sustaining control efforts and protecting livelihoods (six-month extension). Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. © First edition: 2020 FAO, 2021 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]