DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaeology in Canada: an Analysis of Demographics and Working Conditions in the Discipline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaeology in Canada: an Analysis of Demographics and Working Conditions in the Discipline ARCHAEOLOGY IN CANADA: AN ANALYSIS OF DEMOGRAPHICS AND WORKING CONDITIONS IN THE DISCIPLINE by © Catherine L. Jalbert A Dissertation submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Memorial University of Newfoundland May 2019 St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador [email protected] ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the demographic composition and current working conditions among archaeological practitioners in Canada. Previous research documenting the archaeological population has occurred most readily in the United States and the United Kingdom; by contrast, little is known about the Canadian context. To explore this topic, I executed a mixed-methods research design that gathered longitudinal data pertaining to education and employment in archaeology, administered an online survey to the current archaeological population in Canada, and conducted semi-structured interviews with women currently situated within the discipline. The presentation of a long-term, gendered analysis (binary) of available datasets on the archaeological population revealed that more women are educated in archaeology/anthropology departments but are underrepresented in both academic and CRM workplaces. Using both quantitative and qualitative analyses, these structural data were supplemented and compared with the results yielded through the survey and interviews. While the quantitative analysis of survey data further contextualized these findings and aimed to facilitate an understanding of the dynamics at play in archaeological education and work, the qualitative, thematic analysis of interviews allowed these findings to be explored through lived experiences. By approaching this research through a feminist, intersectional lens, these data were used to attempt to develop relational understandings beyond the male/female dichotomy and explore the social composition of archaeology through other identity-based variables. The results of this study show that these data are consistent with broader literature on demographic compositions in other contexts; while women are entering the field at ii increased rates, they are not retained in upper level positions. Similarly, although gender remains the most discernible variable from which to draw conclusions about the archaeological population in Canada, it is also clear that demographics remain relatively homogenous; education and employment sectors lack diversity at all levels. I suggest that while the data in this dissertation provides a mechanism to discuss how various individuals are represented in the present-day discipline from a more intersectional perspective, additional efforts are needed to further understand and examine how exclusionary behaviours manifest and are sustained in archaeological education and practice. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS When I began this dissertation, one thing I often wondered was whether or not this was a topic people cared about. I believe this was due, in part, to the usual baggage that many doctoral students feel, imposter syndrome, emotional (and financial) insecurity, but I also felt it was a matter of support. This is not to say that I did not have the support of my family and friends, whom are thanked below, but it became clear early on that I found myself without the academic support needed for such a massive undertaking like a Ph.D. I think it should not be understated how situations like this, where you need to consider a new supervisor or possibly even quitting, amplifies the already negative feelings you have about your ability, intelligence, and the worth of your research. Due to this, I spent the early years of my doctoral journey frustrated by a lack of supervisory engagement, which in turn made me wonder if doing this degree was even worth it. Clearly this is problematic, but maybe more so for a research topic that deals with people. But I moved ahead and stumbled my way through until year three. That year was pivotal: I finished my requirements, my comprehensive exams, successfully defended my research proposal, and began collecting my data. I was also ready to move away with my partner from Newfoundland. Two weeks before I was to leave the province, my frustrations with supervision reached a breaking point; I needed someone new or I needed to quit. After this realization and through many, many tears, I was lucky enough to be adopted by my current co-supervisors: Dr. Lisa Rankin and Dr. Meghan Burchell. It is because of these two women that I am even writing an acknowledgements section to begin with. And, I am comfortable in admitting, without exaggeration, that if it were not for their support, I would not have completed this degree. I acknowledge that there is a high degree of self- iv motivation that goes into completing any research project, but it is easier to be motivated when there is someone(s) providing you with the necessary encouragement and feedback along the way. It was Meghan and Lisa’s belief in me and in my project that moved it forward. To Lisa, thank you for always being in my corner. We first met when I was accepted into the department in 2007 for my Master’s. Through our interactions when you were Graduate Coordinator and Head of Department, as a student in your classes, and then supervision, and even just having a beer at Ben’s, your knowledge and guidance was integral to my success. To Meghan, I first want to thank you for the passion and support you showed for my topic and me. I always appreciated your spirited emails and the lively exchanges that would sometimes ensue. Thank you for showing me the rights and wrongs of data dissemination and helping me take the “disco” out of this dissertation. Thanks to both of you for providing me with excellent, constructive criticism (usually peppered with funny stories and comments) that made my research stronger. And finally, thank you for providing me with sorely needed encouragement, strength, guidance, and mentorship. I hope I can one day show someone else the support you have shown me. This project was also greatly enhanced by the support of my committee members, Dr. Sonja Boon and Dr. Marica Cassis. To Sonja, I felt like a stray coming to your door in the Department of Gender Studies and I am forever grateful that you agreed to serve on my committee. Your expertise and insight helped me to engage with new (to me) ideas and concepts that were key to how this project developed and will continue to influence how I view the discipline of archaeology in all its forms. To Marica, thank you for your advice and guidance along the way and our chats over coffee. Your understanding and v emotional support helped me through some hard times when I couldn’t see a way forward. To both of you, your comments on my dissertation were invaluable and your advice has helped me begin to think through future directions for this research and how to better own my contributions! This dissertation research also benefitted from a wonderful examination committee: Dr. Katherine Cook, Dr. Véronique Forbes, and Dr. Shannon Lewis-Simpson. I never thought I would say this, but you made the oral defence process a pleasure and I appreciated the opportunity to share my research with you. A special thanks to each of you for your thoughtful and insightful comments on my examination reports. Finishing this degree would not have been possible without the love and support of my parents, Barbara and Patrick, and my brother, Patrick. You might not have always known what I was actually doing, but I appreciate your patience with me over the years as I worked toward this goal. And for not asking me how it was going all the time! To my partner Stewart, you have only ever known me as someone working on their dissertation and somehow this has not sent you running in the opposite direction. Thank you for supporting me through the ups and downs, loving me unconditionally, and supplying me with the required snacks to get the job done. You are my biggest fan. To my best friend, Amy, thank you for finishing your dissertation first so you were fully equipped to talk me off the ledge many times. I could not have done it without you and your friendship. I am ready for retirement whenever you are. To Lori and Maria for being the funniest and kindest Newfoundlanders I know…or will ever know! I cannot wait until we are making each other laugh over drinks again soon, perhaps at a cabin or beach resort? Of course, my emotional support was greatly aided through affection from my beloved pets, Willie vi and Beau. Thank you for letting me give you cuddles when I needed it the most, usually when I was at my lowest (i.e., eating more mini M&M’s than should be humanly possible and binge-watching Netflix). To Liz (PK), we might not always get the chance to chat as often as we would like but I love you and know you’re always there for me. To other friends I met along the way, Kiara, Kat, Abdullah, Emma, Nate, and others, you all supported me at different times with your friendship and I hope our paths cross again one day soon. I would also like to thank Dr. Jon Lohse for his thoughtfulness toward my situation when we worked together at Moore Archaeological/Coastal Environments. You provided me with opportunities to develop and participate in interesting and fulfilling projects as I worked to achieve a balance between my thesis and my working life. I am thankful to know you. For help with data gathering from provincial agencies, I would like to thank Martina Purdon and Todd Kristensen of the Archaeological Survey, Alberta Culture and Tourism, Nathan Friesen of Saskatchewan Parks, Culture, and Sport, Jeff Hunston and Greg Hare of the Yukon Culture Services Branch, Sean Weseloh McKeane of Communities, Culture and Heritage, Nova Scotia, Glen McKay of Cultural Places, Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre, Stephen Hull of the Provincial Archaeology Office, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Tarah Hill, Ministry of Tourism, Culture, Sport in Ontario.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Archaeology W Iny the New Deal
    NEW DEAL ARCHAEOLOGY A NEWW ARCHAEOLOGYY IN THE NEWW DEAL THE RISE OF HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGYY IN THE 1930S Benjamin C. Pykles Benjamin C. Pykles is ann Assistantt Professorr inn thee Departmentt off Anthropologyy att the State University off New York att Potsdam. istorical archaeology—the archaeologyy off the Mod- only standing architectural ern World (approximately the last 500 years off remains from the seven- Hhuman history)—has its disciplinaryy roots in the teenth century. It was not historic preservation movementt off the United States during until 1934, however, when the late nineteenth and earlyy twentieth centuries (Pykles the National Park Service 2008). Historical archaeology’s true institutional beginnings, (NPS) secured possession of however, are tied to the federally sponsored archaeologyy proj- the main portion of ects conducted under the auspices off the Neww Deal pro- Jamestown Island, that a grams off the 1930s. Chieff among those projects in terms of large-scale archaeological the developmentt off historical archaeology in the United program at the site was insti- States were the 1934–1941 excavations at Jamestown, Vir- tuted, relying on the labor of ginia, directed byy J. C. Harrington (Figure 1). During this young African-American critical time in the historyy off the field, Harrington estab- men enrolled in the Civilian lished some off the fundamental methods and practices used Conservation Corps (CCC). Figuree 1. Jeann Carll Harrington by historical archaeologists todayy and did much to promote Because there were few, iff any, (1901-1998), the “founding and legitimize the emerging discipline. As a resultt off these professionally trained archae- ffather”” off historicall archaeology efforts, Harrington is widely recognized as the “founding ologists with any experience, in the Unitedd States.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminism, Consequences, Accountability Sonia Lawrence Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, [email protected]
    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Volume 42, Number 4 (Winter 2004) Article 2 Barbara Betcherman Lecture & Commentaries Feminism, Consequences, Accountability Sonia Lawrence Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Law Commons Commentary Citation Information Lawrence, Sonia. "Feminism, Consequences, Accountability." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 42.4 (2004) : 583-601. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol42/iss4/2 This Commentary is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Commentary FEMINISM, CONSEQUENCES, ACCOUNTABILITY© BY SONIA LAWRENCE* I. INTRODUCTION ................................................ 583 II. ASSESSING THE SUCCESS OF FEMINISM ........................ 589 III. DISCOURSE, DIFFERENCE, DISSONANCE ....................... 591 IV. FEMINISM, FINALITY, AND LAW ................................ 598 V. CONCLUSION .................................................. 601 I. INTRODUCTION Any discussion of the fate of feminist legal advocacy becomes itself a site for the production of feminist legal knowledge. These exercises in stock-taking create narratives that define the scope of initiatives and outcomes that will be regarded as feminist.1 Moreover, they establish which © 2005, S. Lawrence. Assistant Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University. The author would like to thank Susan Boyd and Claire Young for starting this conversation and for being receptive to the contributions of feminists new to the academy, and Mary Jane Mossman and the Institute for Feminist Legal Studies for organizing a stimulating gathering of feminist law teachers in Spring 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations
    Anthropology 6146 Sec 211G/ CBD 234 Dr. Susan D. deFrance Spring 2016 1350-B Turlington Hall/1112 Turlington [email protected] Office hours Tues & Thursday 2-3:30 pm and by appt. The Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations Course Objectives and Goals: This seminar examines issues pertaining to human maritime adaptations in archaeological, ethnohistoric and ethnographic contexts. Issues to be examined include: 1) Definitions of Maritime Adaptations 2) History of Investigations 3) Characteristics of Marine Resources 4) Technology and Organization of Maritime Predation 5) Limitations on Maritime Subsistence 6) Ownership, Territory, and Resource Rights 7) Population, Settlement and Site Size 8) Economic and Political Organization 9) Complexity of Maritime Societies Populations and cultures exhibiting maritime adaptations, among others, include: Jomon, Pacific Islands, Yagan, Andean Coast, Chumash, Northwest Coast, Eskimo/Aleut, Red Paint Archaic, Calusa, European Mesolithic, Coastal Maya Readings are available on the course elearning/Sakai site. Written Work and Class Presentations: 1) Weekly Assignments: 1-2 page review (critique, evaluation – not summaries) of ALL weekly readings. These are due at the start of class; late papers are not accepted without prior permission. 2) Each session students will be assigned one reading to present in detail (max. 15 minutes). Oral presentations will rotate between students depending on the number of reading assignments per week. All students must be prepared to discuss all the weekly readings at class time. 3) Final Paper (due APRIL 25 AT 4 PM- NO late papers, No incompletes, emergencies excluded) – on an approved topic related to the Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations. Final Paper should follow American Antiquity format for bibliography with a minimum of 2 references per page.
    [Show full text]
  • 9564.Ch01.Pdf
    one · Gender and the Problem of Prehistory IMAGINING PREHISTORY To examine the contested issue of gender in ancient Near Eastern prehistory, I be- gin with a definition of the period. Prehistory is the time before the invention of writing (which took place around 3500 bce in the ancient Near East). This period is divided into several major eras of human development in eastern Europe and the ancient Near East: late Paleolithic (c. 30,000–9000 bce), proto-Neolithic and Neo- lithic (c. 9000–5600 bce), and Calcolithic (5600–3500 bce). In the European late Paleolithic, we begin to have some evidence of human creative consciousness in the form of cave paintings, figurines, and tools decorated with designs or with figures of animals or humans. The Neolithic is divided from the Paleolithic by the move- ment from food gathering (hunting and collecting fruits, nuts, and plants) to food growing and domestication of animals. The Calcolithic describes a time of more developed agriculture (including the use of the plow and irrigation) as well as trade and early urbanization. The Neolithic revolution took place gradually in the ancient Near East between 9000 and 7000 bce. At first, herds of wild animals or areas of wild grains were cor- doned oª and controlled by more settled human groups; later, with full domestica- tion, animals were bred for food, milk, or skins, and seeds were conserved for plant- ing grains. These innovations developed along parallel lines in several places in the ancient Near East and spread to other nearby areas. There was not a uniform, straightforward pattern of development.
    [Show full text]
  • World Archaeology, Vol
    Feminisms, Queer Theories, and the Archaeological Study of Past Sexualities Author(s): Barbara L. Voss Source: World Archaeology, Vol. 32, No. 2, Queer Archaeologies (Oct., 2000), pp. 180-192 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/827864 Accessed: 23-08-2015 06:25 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to World Archaeology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 159.178.22.27 on Sun, 23 Aug 2015 06:25:36 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Feminisms,queer theories,and the archaeologicalstudy of past sexualities Barbara L. Voss Abstract Archaeologyfaces the unique challenge of stretchingsocial theories of sexuality in newchrono- logicaland methodological directions. This essay uses an analysisof citational practices to consider how feministand queertheories articulate with archaeological investigations of sexuality.Both queertheories and feminist archaeological practices are shown to be powerfultools that can be used to expandarchaeological interpretations ofgender and sexuality. Keywords Sexuality;gender; queer theory; feminism; history of archaeology. There is another social functionof gender to be considered and that is the social markingof sexuallyappropriate partners...
    [Show full text]
  • INTERVIEW an Interview with Professor Ruth Whitehouse
    INTERVIEW21 An Interview with Professor Ruth Whitehouse, Institute of Archaeology, UCL Interview prepared by Fiona Handley, Steve Townend, Julie Eklund and Cornelia Kleinitz Ruth Whitehouse was recently made the first female professor at the Institute of Archae- ology, UCL. She was awarded her PhD from the University of Cambridge in 1968 and has had ongoing research interests in the prehistory of Italy, with particular foci on religion and ritual, and gender. She was a founder member of the Accordia Research Institute in 1988, which promotes Italian archaeology in the UK. She was the co-director of the survey and excavation of the Iron Age site of Gravina in Puglia in southern Italy, and of the Alto-Medio Polesine-Basso Veronese Project on the Po plain. Prof. Whitehouse has recently begun two new projects in Italy: ‘The Tavoliere/Gargano Prehistory Project’ and ‘Developmental Literacy and the Establishment of Regional and State Identity in Early Italy: Research Be- yond Etruria, Greece and Rome’. Could you give us an account of your career to date? How did you be- come interested in archaeology? I was interested in archaeology as a child; from about the age of 12 I can remember knowing that that’s what I wanted to do. I grew up in a middle class family that went to museums and things like that, and I had a great uncle of German-Jewish ori- gin who was a history professor and living in America at the time that I knew him. He always encouraged me; I remember him giving me as a birthday present at an early age, Wessex from the Air, which is a book of aerial photographs of Wessex.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachings from Indigenous Women Political Leaders in Saskatchewan
    IDENTITY AND SOLIDARITY IN HYBRID SPACES: NARRATIVES OF INDIGENOUS WOMEN POLITICAL LEADERS IN SASKATCHEWAN AND GUATEMALA. A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Interdisciplinary Studies University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Ruth Michelle Beveridge © Copyright Ruth Michelle Beveridge, June 2012. All rights reserved. 'I hereby grant to University of Saskatchewan and/or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or for the duration of my copyright ownership. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also reserve the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter that is included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee.' i ABSTRACT The lives of ten Indigenous women political leaders are bound together with narratives of violence and healing, identity and citizenship, power and solidarity. Although they live in separate countries - the province of Saskatchewan in Canada, and the country of Guatemala in Central America – they share a similar collective history of colonial violence, assimilation and oppression.
    [Show full text]
  • Laura Mulvey and Peter Wollen
    Laura Mulvey and Peter Wollen: Theory and Practice, Aesthetics and Politics, 1963-1983 Nicolas Helm-Grovas Royal Holloway, University of London PhD, Media Arts 1 Declaration of Authorship I, Nicolas Helm-Grovas, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. 15 January, 2018 2 Abstract This PhD is a genealogy and critical examination of the writings and films of Laura Mulvey and Peter Wollen, spanning the period from the early 1960s to 1980s. Despite the prominence of their texts, there has not been a book-length study of either body of writing, nor an overview of their overlap and mutual influence, in what was their most productive period. Nor has there been an extended account of the important connection between their theory and their practice as filmmakers. My thesis undertakes these tasks. I interpret and challenge existing scholarship, while simultaneously examining in detail for the first time lesser-known works, drawing on archives and interviews. Through close readings I elucidate Mulvey’s interrogation of the patriarchal fantasies structuring cinematic and artistic forms and her feminist appropriation of classical Hollywood melodrama; I map the related issues Wollen’s texts activate, of cinematic signification and materialism, the buried potentialities of the historical avant-gardes, and their connection to the avant-garde film contemporaneous with his writings. Their moving image works, I demonstrate through detailed analyses, bring these ideas into dialogue and work them through in a more open, exploratory vein. I trace key notions like ‘counter cinema’ across films and writings by both authors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Living History (1973-1993): How the Experiences of Early Activists Shaped the Violence Against Women (VAW) Movement in Ontario: a Case Study
    A Living History (1973-1993): How the Experiences of Early Activists Shaped the Violence Against Women (VAW) Movement in Ontario: A Case Study by Deborah Ann Sinclair A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work University of Toronto © Copyright by Deborah Ann Sinclair 2019 A Living History (1973-1993): How the Experiences of Early Activists Shaped the Violence Against Women (VAW) Movement in Ontario: A Case Study Deborah Ann Sinclair Doctor of Philosophy Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work University of Toronto 2019 Abstract This dissertation shines a light on a group of women who helped to create a violence against women (VAW) movement that changed the course of history in Ontario, Canada for countless women, their families and their communities. This study centres the voices of activists, positioning them as knowledge producers with expertise and wisdom gleaned during five decades of work in the VAW movement in Ontario. A feminist analysis of the VAW movement begins from the standpoint of women. In particular, an intersectional feminist analysis begins from the standpoint of diverse women who embrace the tenets of critical feminist standpoint theory. This study draws on social movement theory (SMT) literature, particularly the scholarship of feminist SMT researchers, to examine the state of the VAW movement in Ontario, Canada. This dissertation is a story about a social movement, specifically the VAW movement in Ontario—a strand of the women’s liberation movement frequently referred to as the second wave, but also on the cusp of ushering in third wave feminism.
    [Show full text]
  • Branching Out: Second-Wave Feminist Periodicals and the Archive of Canadian Women’S Writing Tessa Jordan University of Alberta
    Branching Out: Second-Wave Feminist Periodicals and the Archive of Canadian Women’s Writing Tessa Jordan University of Alberta Look, I push feminist articles as much as I can ... I’ve got a certain kind of magazine. It’s not Ms. It’s not Branching Out. It’s not Status of Women News. Doris Anderson Rough Layout hen Edmonton-based Branching Out: Canadian Magazine for WWomen (1973 to 1980) began its thirty-one-issue, seven-year history, Doris Anderson was the most prominent figure in women’s magazine publishing in Canada. Indeed, her work as a journalist, editor, novelist, and women’s rights activist made Anderson one of the most well-known faces of the Canadian women’s movement. She chaired the Canadian Advisory Coun- cil on the Status of Women from 1979 to 1981 and was the president of the National Action Committee on the Status of Women from 1982 to 1984, but she is best known as the long-time editor of Chatelaine, Can- ada’s longest lived mainstream women’s magazine, which celebrated its eightieth anniversary in 2008. As Chatelaine’s editor from 1957 to 1977, she was at the forefront of the Canadian women’s movement, publishing articles and editorials on a wide range of feminist issues, including legal- izing abortion, birth control, divorce laws, violence against women, and ESC 36.2–3 (June/September 2010): 63–90 women in politics. When Anderson passed away in 2007, then Governor- General Adrienne Clarkson declared that “Doris was terribly important as a second-wave feminist because she had the magazine for women and Tessa Jordan (ba it was always thoughtful and always had interesting things in it” (quoted Victoria, ma Alberta) in Martin).
    [Show full text]
  • Methodological Issues in Zooarchaeology
    Methodological Issues in Zooarchaeology Tanya M. Peres The main goal of zooarchaeology, as a specialty within archaeology, is to interpret human and environment interactions based primarily on the animal remains recov- ered from archaeological sites. This chapter is not meant to be a comprehensive text on zooarchaeology; rather it is a guide to some of the analytical methods and ter- minology that are used commonly by practitioners of zooarchaeology. While each researcher has her/his own way of analyzing and interpreting animal remains, some methods, terms, and analytical tools are considered standard. The purpose of this chapter is to give the reader an overview of basic methodological issues and appli- cations within zooarchaeology. I acknowledge that not all the faunal remains recov- ered from archaeological sites are related to subsistence activities; however, as the chapters included in this volume are centered on discerning subsistence behaviors through the integration of multiple datasets, I focus more on subsistence practices here. This chapter addresses taphonomic and recovery issues as well as sampling and analytical methods to enable the reader to understand the case studies included in this volume (for a similar treatment of paleoethnobotanical remains, see Wright, this volume). 1 Why Study Zooarchaeology? Animal remains can be used to inform us about a variety of issues in the study of societies, such as environment, seasonality, subsistence, hunting practices, political and social organization, settlement patterns, and resource-use. As a discipline, zoo- archaeology has grown exponentially over the past three decades to include special- ists working in dozens of countries on all aspects and time periods of human history (Hesse and Wapnish 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Broadening #Metoo: Tracking Dynamics in Canadian
    Broadening #MeToo: Tracking Dynamics in Canadian Archaeology Through a Survey on Experiences Within the Discipline Lisa Hodgetts†, Kisha Supernant‡, Natasha Lyons§£, and John R. Welch£ Abstract. The #MeToo movement has afin d’identifier l’étendue des formes de dis- turned global attention to structural power crimination, d’exploitation, de harcèlement differentials grounded in gender, race, et de violence sexualisés et non sexualisés sexual orientation, and other aspects of dans notre domaine. Notre enquête a reçu identity, leading archaeologists to confront 564 réponses d’archéologues représentant injustice in different sectors of our discipline, un large éventail de sexes, d’âges, de stade with a focus on sexual harassment and sexual de carrière et de secteurs. Les résultats assault. In 2019, the Canadian Archaeologi- indiquent qu’une grande partie des archéo- cal Association’s Working Group on Equity logues canadiens ont eu des expériences and Diversity conducted a survey of Canadian négatives au cours de leurs travaux et de leurs archaeologists to identify the extent of both études. Cette première étape de l’analyse met sexualized and non-sexualized forms of dis- l’accent sur les tendances démographiques crimination, exploitation, harassment, and chez les répondants à l’enquête et les dif- violence in our field. Our survey yielded 564 férences notables dans leurs expériences responses from archaeologists representing fondées sur le sexe, le stade de carrière et la a wide range of genders, ages, career stages, participation au secteur académique ou de la and sectors. The results indicate a large gestion des ressources culturelles. portion of Canadian archaeologists have had negative experiences in the course of Our sciences stand to be better— their work and study.
    [Show full text]