Goldschmidt Conference Abstracts 2002 A133

Immiscible dolomitic carbonatitic Can Komatiites be ‘dry’ plume-type and trachytic and the first magmas?

occurrence of carbonatites in the M.J. CHEADLE1 & D.SPARKS2 French Massif Central 1 Dept. of Geology & Geophysics, University of Wyoming, USA ([email protected]) G. CHAZOT1, H. BERTRAND2, J. MERGOIL1, 2 Dept. of Geology & Geophysics, Texas A&M University, S.M.F. SHEPPARD2 Texas, USA ([email protected]) 1 Lab. Géologie, Univ. Blaise pascal et OPGC, 5 rue Kessler, 63038 Clermont-Ferrand, France, [email protected] Archaean komatiites are the highest MgO recorded bpclermont.fr on the and therefore must have formed by anomalously 2 Lab. Sciences de la Terre, ENS et UCBL, 46 allée d’Italie, high temperature, relatively ‘dry’, melting (in mantle plumes?) 69364 Lyon, France. or by volatile/water induced melting (in zones?). As with modern-day magmas, it is possible that A pyroclastic from the Velay volcanic province in the komatiites were generated in both environments; the key French Massif Central contains as mafic and problem is to recognise diagnostic characteristics that can be cumulates, some of which contain carbonates, and - used to determine the environment in which the komatiites bearing volcanic . The carbonates, Mg-siderite in the formed. mafic cumulates or occasionally in some breccias and calcite Field constraints are most important. Many komatiites are in the felsic cumulates, are always associated with a silicate demonstrably poor flows that erupted non- glass of trachytic composition. Dolomite occurs in large explosively and crystallized spinifex textured flow-tops above amounts (up to 57%), principally as immiscible globules in -rich cumulate lower zones at low pressures. silicate melt (now glass), in breccias. These samples represent Consequently, it is most unlikely that they were magmatically the first occurrence of carbonatite in the French Massif wet melts. Even if they were, they probably would have Central. Associated feldspars and carbonates in the three types degassed water before crystallization and thus it is difficult to of xenoliths are approximately in Sr isotopic equilibrium with infer magmatic water contents by studying the products of in- an initial ratio of about 0.7042. C- and O-isotopic situ or shallow crystallization. The second diagnostic characteristic is whole-rock compositions of carbonates covary and cover a very large , yet this is fraught with the problem that range of composition from –2.8 to 3.9 ‰ (PDB) and 8.6 to komatiites are high degree melts (up to 50% of the mantle) 23.8 ‰ (SMOW) respectively, but the dolomites have primary and thus major and many trace element compositions must δ13 igneous isotopic signatures with C from –2.8 to –2.6 ‰ and converge regardless of whether they are formed by volatile or δ18 O from 8.6 to 8.7‰. The covariation, with slope of ~0.4, is high temperature induced melting. Interpretation of the similar to that observed in carbonatites worlwide, but extends geochemistry is further complicated by the fact that komatiites to much higher C- and O- isotopic values. require physical conditions of melt generation that do not The combined C-O-Sr isotopic data indicate that the occur today. Models of komatiite generation based on dolomitic carbonatitic and silicate magmas came from a geochemistry must be physically plausible and all existing mantle source with very similar isotopic characteristics. On models require high mantle temperatures. Komatiite compositional arguments, injection of a non-cogenetic generation at subduction zones requires higher mantle wedge carbonatite into the differentiating felsic magma temperatures (+/- faster convection) than today, and thus within the crust is preferred to the unmixing of a relatively late implicitly requires the presence of hot mantle plumes. One fractionated melt to carbonatitic and trachytic magmas. The problem with subduction zone melting models is that they textures, high δ13C and δ18O values of Mg-siderite and calcite can’t produce the 50% melting and the source signature and their trend are consistent with precipitation of the required by some komatiites. We will present the arguments carbonates during CO either (1) by interaction for komatiite generation by anhydrous melting and a viable 2 physical model for their origin in high temperature mantle between open-system isotopically evolving CO -rich fluid 2 plumes. (<20 mole % H2O), that followed magma degassing, and the pre-existing silicate minerals of the cumulates at temperatures of about 350¡C, or (2) and more probably, by interaction between a CO2- H2O fluid (>90-95 mole % H2O) isotopically buffered by the degassing magma and the cumulates at temperatures decreasing down to about 150-125¡C for the calcite-bearing . The associated glasses are subtlety altered. Explosive eruption that entrained the xenoliths probably occurred soon after injection of the carbonatitic magma into the felsic magma. The model of CO2 metasomatism can be applied to other carbonatites displaying the δ13C-δ18O trend with slope of ~0.4.