DOCSLIB.ORG

SARD-M Report for the Carpathian Convention Member States Assessment of Policies, Institutions and Processes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SARD-M Report for the Carpathian Convention Member States Assessment of Policies, Institutions and Processes Project co-financed by the EU SARD-M Report for the Carpathian Convention Member States Assessment of Policies, Institutions and Processes Regional Synthesis for Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Republic of Serbia, Slovak Republic and Ukraine This publication has been produced in the framework of the Carpathian Project under the INTERREG III B CADSES Neighbourhood Programme and co-financed by the European Union. European Academy of Bolzano/Bozen Institute for Regional Development and Location Management Bolzano/Bozen, July 2008 Authors: Flavio V. Ruffini, Christian Hoffmann, Thomas Streifeneder & Kathrin Renner Institute for Regional Development and Location Management European Academy of Bolzano/Bozen Viale Druso 1 I-39100 Bolzano/Bozen, Italy www.eurac.edu Commissioned by: UNEP Vienna – Interim Secretariat of Carpathian Convention within the INTERREG CADSES CARPATHIAN PROJECT Vienna International Centre PO Box 500 A-1400 Vienna, Austria www.carpathianconvention.org/index.htm Supervision of: Harald Egerer – Head and Pier Carlo Sandei – Associate Programme Officer In the framework of the SARD-M project coordinated by: Jean Gault Project – Coordinator SARD-M Department ES Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00153 Rome, Italy English proofreading: Peter Farbridge 3904 Laval Avenue, Montreal, Quebec H2W 2J1 www.ideefeconde.ca/en/home.htm Disclaimer: The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union, of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), of the Carpathian Convention or of the partner institutions. Citation: Ruffini F. V., C. Hoffmann, T. Streifeneder and K. Renner 2008: SARD-M Report for the Carpathian Convention Member States. Assessment of Policies, Institutions and Processes, Regional Synthesis for Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Republic of Serbia, Slovak Republic and Ukraine. European Academy of Bolzano/Bozen, p. 63. ISBN: 978-88-88906-46-1 Bolzano/Bozen, July 2008 4 July 2008 SARD-M Report for the CC Member States Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Tables ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Abbreviations..................................................................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 The SARD Initiative ............................................................................................................... 9 1.2 FAO and SARD ................................................................................................................... 10 1.3 The SARD-M Report for the Carpathian Region ................................................................10 1.4 Project Area ........................................................................................................................ 12 2 Background Information on the Carpathian Countries and Regions ................................... 17 2.1 Land Use ............................................................................................................................. 17 2.2 Population ........................................................................................................................... 20 2.3 Employment ........................................................................................................................ 22 3 SARD-M Policy Programmes and Related Institutions ..........................................................25 3.1 Policy Frameworks and Policies for SARD-M .....................................................................25 3.1.1 Policies of Rural Development ................................................................................................ 26 3.1.2 Policies on Agriculture ............................................................................................................. 27 3.1.3 Policies on Biodiversity, Nature Conservation and the Environment ....................................... 29 3.1.4 Forestry Policies ..................................................................................................................... 31 3.2 Governance Structures and Institutional Settings for SARD-M Policies ............................. 32 3.2.1 National Level ......................................................................................................................... 32 3.2.2 Regional and Local Level ........................................................................................................ 35 3.2.3 NGO Initiatives involved in SARD-M in the Carpathian Mountains ......................................... 36 4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Policies, Institutions and Processes .................................. 37 4.1 Impact and Perception of Policies & Processes for SARD-M .............................................37 4.1.1 Special EU Policy Programmes for Rural Development .......................................................... 39 4.1.2 Rural Development Programmes ............................................................................................ 40 4.1.3 Socio-Economic Aspects in Rural Areas ................................................................................. 42 4.1.4 Agricultural Programmes ......................................................................................................... 44 4.1.5 Environment, Nature Conservation and Biodiversity Strategies .............................................. 48 4.1.6 Forestry Programmes ............................................................................................................. 50 4.2 The Effect of Institutions in Charge of the SARD-M Process ............................................. 51 4.2.1 National Level ......................................................................................................................... 51 4.2.2 Regional and Local Level ........................................................................................................ 53 5 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 55 5.1 Recommendations related to the Carpathian Convention .................................................. 55 5.2 EU related Recommendations ............................................................................................55 5.3 Policy and Process related Recommendations ..................................................................56 5.4 Recommendations: Institutional Perspectives ....................................................................59 5.5 Future Prospects and Challenges .......................................................................................61 5.6 SARD-M Strategies in Line with CC Articles ......................................................................62 6 References .................................................................................................................................. 65 SARD-M Report for the CC Member States July 2008 5 CONTENTS Figures Figure 1: Cross-Linking the SARD-M Process with the Carpathian Convention. The Results of the SARD-M Synthesis Report will be considered by the Working Group of Sustainable Rural Development, Agriculture and Forestry. ................................................................................ 11 Figure 2: Administrative Units considered in the National Carpathian SARD-M Reports (Map: Kathrin Renner, EURAC). ............................................................................................................... 14 Figure 3: The National Delimitation of the Carpathians Regarding the NPs (162,000 km2). ........................... 15 Figure 4: The Distribution of Forest and Agricultural Areas within the NP of the CC (RUFFINI et al., 2006). .............................................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 5: According to the NP, almost 60% of the Carpathians are covered by forest (RUFFINI et al., 2006). ........................................................................................................................................ 19 Figure 6: Distribution of the Country-wide and Carpathian-wide Agricultural Land Use Types (Sources: National Agrarian Area: EUROSTAT 2003; the Carpathian Agrarian Area: National SARD-M Reports, Hungarian Carpathians: EUROSTAT 2005 – NUTS3)......................... 19 Figure 7: Land Use and Land Cover in the Carpathians (CLC 1990, PELCOM; RUFFINI et al., 2006). .............................................................................................................................................. 20 Figure 8: Population Density at the Municipal Level (LAU2) (RUFFINI et al., 2006). ........................................ 22 Figure 9: Proportion of Employees per Sector (Map: Kathrin Renner, EURAC). ...........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Activity 2.7: Forestry and Timber Industry
    INTERREG III B CADSES Programme Carpathian Project Activity 2.7: Forestry and timber industry Report on Current State of Forest Resources in the Carpathians ( Working Group: Tommaso Anfodillo Marco Carrer Elena Dalla Valle Elisa Giacoma Silvia Lamedica Davide Pettenella Legnaro, 20 January 2008 UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA DIPARTIMENTO TERRITORIO E SISTEMI AGRO-FORESTALI AGRIPOLIS – Viale dell’Università, 16 – 35020 LEGNARO (Padova) Tel. +390498272728-+390498272730 – Fax +3904982722750 – P.IVA 00742430283 Disclaimer: This publication has been produced by the Carpathian Project under the INTERREG III B CADSES Neighbourhood Programme and co-financed by the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union, of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), of the Carpathian Convention or of the partner institutions. Activity 2.7 Carpathian Project – University of Padova, Dept. TeSAF INDEX INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................5 The Carpathian Convention - SARD-F..............................................................................................................5 Objectives.........................................................................................................................................................5 Methods............................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian Association of Geomorphologists Revista De
    ROMANIAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOMORPHOLOGISTS REVISTA DE GEOMORFOLOGIE 18 editura universității din bucurești 2016 Revista de Geomorfologie 18/2016 Editor-in-Chief: Maria Rădoane, University of Suceava, Romania Guest Editors: Lóczy Dénes, University of Pecs, Hungary, Slavoljub Dragićević, University of Belgrade, Serbia Sandu Boengiu, University of Craiova, Romania Editorial Board Achim Beylich, Geological Survey of Norway (NGU), Geo-Environment Division, Norway Alfred Vespremeanu-Stroe, University of Bucharest Armelle Decaulne, Université de Nantes, Laboratoire GEOLITTOMER UMR - 6554 CNRSLETG, France Aurel Perșoiu, Institute of Speology Emil Racovita, Cluj Napoca Ciprian Mărgărint, Al I Cuza University of Iassy Dan Dumitriu, Al I Cuza University of Iassy Daniel Germain, Université du Québec à Montréal, Département de Géographie, Canada Dănuț Petrea, Babeș Bolyai University of Cluj Napoca Floare Grecu, University of Bucharest Francisca Chiriloaei, University of Suceava Hans-Balder Havenith, Université de Liège, Belgia Ian Evans, University of Durham, United Kingdom Ion Ioniță, Al I Cuza University of Iassy Jean-Philippe Malet, Université de Strasbourg, France Laura Comănescu, University of Bucharest Lucian Drăguț, West University of Timisoara Marta Jurchescu, Institute of Geography, Bucharest Mauro Soldati, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Italy Mihai Micu, Institute of Geography, Bucharest Mircea Voiculescu, West University of Timisoara Nicolae Cruceru, Spiru Haret University Olimpiu Pop, University Babeș Bolyai of Cluj Napoca
    [Show full text]
  • Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains
    BOKU-Berichte zur Wildtierforschung und Wildbewirtschaftung 24 16 BOKU-Reports on Wildlife 2021 Research & Game Management ISSN 1021-3252 ISSN (online) 2788-5747 Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains A joint publication by International Council for Secretariat of the Game and Wildlife Conservation Carpathian Convention 1 Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains Volume Editors: Klaus Hackländer, Jacqueline Frair, Ovidiu Ionescu Series Editor: Ursula Nopp-Mayr BOKU-Reports on Wildlife Research & Game Management Nr. 24 ISSN 1021-3252 ISSN (online) 2788-5747 Recommended citation: Hackländer K, Frair J, Ionescu O (2021): Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains. A joint publication by the International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation and the Secretariat of the Carpathian Convention. BOKU- Reports on Wildlife Research & Game Management 24. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna. Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Birgit Lahner for technical assistance and Mark Ryan for language editing. © Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management (IWJ), 2021 Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research (DIBB) University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Gregor Mendel Str. 33 A 1180 Vienna Austria 2 Table of Content Foreword CIC ........................................................................................................ 4 Foreword Carpathian Convention ....................................................................... 6 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Hazardous Substances in Karst Aquifer Waters – One of the Results of the Operational Monitoring of Groundwater in Serbia
    GEOLOŠKI ANALI BALKANSKOGA POLUOSTRVA Volume 81 (2), December 2020, 49–61 – https://doi.org/10.2298/GABP201107010S Original scientific paper Оригинални научни рад Hazardous Substances in Karst Aquifer Waters – One of the Results of the Operational Monitoring of Groundwater in Serbia 1 1 ORan TEVanOVić E1LjKO aRinOVić Z RanSiSLaV ETRO,V V ić M & B P Abstract. Hydrogeological survey of wider Majdanpek mining area in the Carpathian mountain arch of eastern Serbia, including open mine pits, tailings sites, and major karstic springs and caves has been undertaken in order to es - timate environmental conditions in groundwater ibno sdityu (GWB) “Krš–sever”, groundwater quality, and to investigate causes of their earlier indicated poor chemical status. Bearing in mind that Majdanpek copper mine field is directly bordering the karst aquifer and delineated GWB “Krš–sever”, the two karst springs namely Valja Fundata and Kaludjerica were measured and sam - pled in high and low-water periods (spring 2019, late autumn 2019 and spring 2020). Sampling and analysis of groundwater were carried out under the frame of project “Operational Monitoring of Groundwater of the Republic of Serbia”, established by the Ministry of Environmental Protection of Serbia. The field measurements of unstable chemical components and physical properties as well as laboratory analyses confirme2d+ very2+ poo2r+ and e2– ven hazardous water quality of both surveyed springs Valja Fundata and K4aludjerica. Registered concentrations of some ions, such as Fe , Mn , Ca , SO are high above maxi - mal permitted level for potable water in Serbia. High turbidity rate also con - firms impact of colloidal suspensions from the tailing which is located in karstic blind valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Ecological Network for the Carpathians
    Towards an Ecological Network for the Carpathians This publication is the result of the BBI/Matra programme entitled “Development of an Ecological Network for the Carpathians”, which was implemented between April 2006 and April 2009 and funded by the BBI Matra program of the Dutch government. Towards an Ecological Network for the Carpathians Preface The purpose of the project was to support the imple- mentation of the ‘Convention on the Protection and Sustainable Development of the Carpathians’ (herein- after Carpathian Convention) that entered into force in January 2006 after ratification by four contracting par- ties. The development of an ecological network in the Carpathians, as a constituent part of the Pan-European Authors: Ecological Network, is one of the important objectives of the Convention. Chapter 2: Carpathian Biodiversity Information System Jan Seffer and Rastislav Lasak (Daphne, Institute of Applied Ecology) The ecological network designed, serves as an important Chapter 3: Ecological Network Design tool for governments and the Interim Secretariat of the Mike Baltzer (WWF-DCPO), Irene Bouwma (Alterra), Lawrence Jones Carpathian Convention for the planning of sustainable Walters (ECNC on Ken and SPEN outcomes) and Bob Smith (Durrell development. Institute of Conservation and Ecology) Chapter 4: Recommendations The project was carried out under the overall responsi- Mike Baltzer (WWF-DCPO), Karina Kitnaes (Orbicon) bility of Wageningen International (part of Wageningen and Henk Zingstra (Wageningen International) University) and in cooperation with the Carpathian Chapter 5: Status and Recommendations per target country Ecoregion Initiative (CERI), which was responsible for the Karina Kitnaes (Orbicon) and Henk Zingstra (Wageningen project implementation in the three target countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Geotrip of the IAH Karst Commission in Karst of Romania and Serbia, June 2019
    Report of the Geotrip of the IAH Karst Commission in karst of Romania and Serbia, June 2019 The idea to invite colleagues from all over the world and present wonders of geology and karst landscape and features, but also cultural heritage of the Southern Carpathians and Danube Gorge between Romania and Serbia is proposed by the author of this report during IAH Congress in Dubrovnik, in 2017. It is now a pleasure to announce that geotrip was successfully organized by joint effort of Romanian and Serbian hydrogeologists, between 14-18 June, 2019 with participants of 26 members and friends of the Karst Commission arrived from 11 countries (Albania, Brazil, Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Russia, Slovakia, Romania and Serbia). In this way an old tradition of the Commission to have such common field trips and workshops was renewed and represents a good starter for the 50 Anniversary of its foundation, which should be celebrated next year during the conference “UNESCO and Karst 2020” (18-22 May 2020, Bowling Green, Kentucky). On 14 June most of participants arrived to Belgrade, and then a bus transfer to Donji Milanovac, a small city at the Danube reservoir bank, was organized. Five members of the KC in visit of Jovan Cvijić’s museum in Belgrade Geotrip area in the Carpathian karst between Danube and Olt Rivers 1 Djerdap Gorge between Serbia (on the left) and Romania – viewpoint Vidikovac between Donji Milanovac and Tekija) On June, 15 participants travelled to Romania by crossing the bridge dam of Djerdap (Port de Fer). Meeting with Romanian colleagues and guides Adrian Iurkiewicz, Iulian Popa, Iancu Oraşeanu and Marius Mocuta took place in Turnu Severin.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia Prepared by Lex Mundi Member Firm, JPM Janković Popović Mitić
    Guide to Doing Business Serbia Prepared by Lex Mundi member firm, JPM Janković Popović Mitić lexmundi.com GUIDE TO DOING BUSINESS IN SERBIA 2021 Guide to Doing Business in Serbia 2021 Publisher: JPM Janković Popović Mitić NBGP Apartments, 6 Vladimira Popovića street www.jpm.rs Author: JPM team Design and prepress: JPM Janković Popović Mitić Copyright: © JPM Janković Popović Mitić 2021. All rights reserved. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS : I SERBIA AT A GLANCE II FORMS OF BUSINESS ORGANIZATION III INVESTMENTS AND INVESTMENT SUPPORT IV REQUIREMENTS FOR STATING A BUSINESS V COMPETITION LAW VI ACQUIRING REAL ESTATE AND CONSTRUCTION VII PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS AND CONCESSIONS VIII FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IX EXCHANGE CONTROLS X IMPORT AND EXPORT REGULATION XI TAX LIABILITIES XII LABOUR LAW AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP XIII EXPATRIATE EMPLOYEES XIV OTHER MATTER RELATING TO DOING BUSINESS XV CESSATION OR TERMINATION OF BUSINESS Disclaimer: The high level of accuracy and exactness of this guide is the result of the strong effort made by its authors. However, the information contained in this guide is not meant to be taken as advice, but simply as a pamphlet designed to provide rel- evant information. Therefore readers are urged to seek specialist advice on the individual issues emphasized herein and to verify the present- ed information before taking any action thereupon. 3 I SERBIA AT A GLANCE 4 I. SERBIA AT A GLANCE 1. Geographic position The Republic of Serbia is a country located in southeast Europe, with a total area of 88.361 km². Most of its territory is situated in the Balkan peninsula (around 80%), so the central and southern parts of the country are mostly characterized by limestone and mountainous areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom of Hungary
    匈牙利 HUNGARY (Magyar 馬扎兒 ország) Main divisions of the Carpathians 咯爾巴阡山脈, 是僅次於阿爾卑斯山脈的歐洲第二大山系 1. Outer Western Carpathians 2. Inner Western Carpathians 3. Outer Eastern Carpathians 4. Inner Eastern Carpathians 5. Southern Carpathians 6. Western Romanian Carpathians 7. Transylvanian Plateau 8. Serbian Carpathians Timeline of the Carpathian Basin 咯爾巴阡盆地 Rulers (Pannonian 潘諾亞盆地) - Celtic period (after c. 450 BC) - Pannonia - Roman period (from 9 BC) - Attila the Hun period (from 435) - the Germanic Ostrogoths (from 454) - the Lombards (from 454) - the Gepids (from 454) - the Avar Khaganate (from 560) - the Bulgars (from 9th century) - the Franks (from 9th century) - Hungarians led by Árpád (from 896) - Magyar - Kingdom of Hungary (1001-1918) - [Royal Hungary + Ottoman Hungary (1541-1699)] - Kingdom of Hungary (Regency) (1920-1946) - People's Republic of Hungary (1949-1989) - Republic of Hungary (1989- ) Hungary is a landlocked country in the Carpathian Basin in Central Europe, bordered by Austria (奧地利), Slovakia (斯洛伐克), Ukraine (烏克蘭), Romania (羅馬尼亞), Serbia (塞爾維亞), Croatia (克羅地亞), and Slovenia (斯洛文尼亞). Its capital is Budapest (布達佩斯). Hungary is a member of EU (歐洲聯盟), NATO (北大西洋公約組織), OECD (經濟合作與發展組織), V4 (維謝格拉德集團) and is a Schengen state (申根公約). The official language is Hungarian, which is part of the Finno-Ugric family (芬蘭- 烏戈爾語族). 匈牙利地跨三個氣候帶:海洋型氣候、大陸型氣候與地中海型氣候. The foundation of Hungary was laid in the late 9th century by the Hungarian ruler Árpád (阿爾帕德), whose great-grandson Stephen I (聖斯德望一世) of Hungary was crowned with a crown sent from Rome by the pope in 1000. The Kingdom of Hungary lasted for 946 years, and at various points was regarded as one of the cultural centers of the Western world.
    [Show full text]
  • Vestiges of Cambro-Ordovician Continental Accretion in the Carpathian-Balkan Orogen: First Evidence of the ‘Cenerian’ Event in the Central Serbo-Macedonian Unit
    Acta Geologica Polonica, Vol. 71 (2021), No. 2, pp. 219–247 DOI: 10.24425/agp.2020.134558 Vestiges of Cambro-Ordovician continental accretion in the Carpathian-Balkan orogen: First evidence of the ‘Cenerian’ event in the central Serbo-Macedonian Unit DARKO SPAHIĆ1*, ZORAN BOJIĆ1, DANICA POPOVIĆ1 and TIVADAR GAUDENYI2 1 Geological Survey of Serbia, Rovinjska 12, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia. 2 Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Djure Jakšića 9, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia. * Corresponding author: [email protected]; [email protected] Darko Spahić: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-0782 Tivadar Gaudenyi: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1843-2384 ABSTRACT: Spahić, D., Bojić, Z., Popović, D. and Gaudenyi, T. 2021. Vestiges of Cambro-Ordovician continental accretion in the Carpathian-Balkan orogen: First evidence of the ‘Cenerian event’ in the central Serbo-Macedonian Unit. Acta Geologica Polonica, 71 (2), 219–247. Warszawa. In the Balkans, the Serbo-Macedonian Unit (SMU), Serbia, is thrust bounded by the composite Tethyan Vardar Zone and the Carpatho-Balkanides. The SMU actually emerges from beneath the Neoalpine Miocene–Pliocene deposits. Both provenance and geodynamic position of the SMU are poorly known and still debated. This paper reviews the data hitherto published and includes some new field data interpretations. The SMU is composed of a Neoproterozoic–Cambrian high-grade (para- and ortho-) gneiss with peraluminous magmatic arc components (560–470 Ma). The SMU is in the contact with Neoproterozoic upper Ordovician–Carboniferous low-grade metasedimentary succession of an accretionary wedge assembly represented by the Supragetic basement. The SMU basement became folded, sheared and metamorphosed around 490–450 Ma.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of the Pan- Carpathian Expeditions (Mr. Jerzy Montusiewicz, Mr. ANDREI DUMITRESCU, Mr. VLAD SPIRU)
    The story of a PAN-CARPATHIAN passage 1980 and 2015 Lillafüred, Hungary, 10-12 October 2017, Carpathian Convention The story of a PAN-CARPATHIAN passage 1980 and 2015 JERZY MONTUSIEWICZ S T U D E N T CLUB O F BESKID GUIDES (SKPB) LUBLIN, POLAND ANDREI DUMITRESCU, VLAD SPIRU ROMANIA ASOCIAŢIA CARPATINĂ A R D E L E A N Ă A TURIŞTILOR Lillafüred, Hungary, 10-12 October 2017, Carpathian Convention Why the Pan-Carpathian passage ? 3 The Carpathians are the mountains in which Polish tourism was born, The Carpathians are an area of many nations, cultures, religions, The Carpathians join rather than divide, Poles have always wanted to achieve the crossing of the whole range, Polish trekkers have tried to walk the Carpathians several times. Earlier attempts 4 1962 – geography students of the University of Warsaw, . walked in Poland from Cieszyn (southern Silesia) to the Uzhok Pass (end of Western Bieszczady), . drove to Romania and walked almost all of the Romanian Carpathian section. 3 trekkers reached Orşova on the Danube. the Poles walked in the company of Romanian trekkers. 1967 – Student Club of Beskid Guides in Warsaw . planned to organise the „Carpathian Friendship Expedition 1967”, . dreams remained only on paper. Earlier attempts 5 1973 – students from mountain guide club planned to walk the Carpathians in the form of a relay. the route was divided into 7 stages, . only 2 stages were done. Badge of the expedition Arc of the Carpathians 1980 Student Club of Beskid Guides, Warsaw 6 Leader: Andrzej Wielocha Participants: - Piotr Kurowski, - Jerzy Montusiewicz (Lublin), - Zdzisław Pecul, - Wiesław Tomaszewski.
    [Show full text]
  • Stojadinovic[1].Pdf
    TECTO-127364; No of Pages 21 Tectonophysics xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Structure and provenance of Late Cretaceous–Miocene sediments located near the NE Dinarides margin: Inferences from kinematics of orogenic building and subsequent extensional collapse Uros Stojadinovic a,c,⁎, Liviu Matenco b,PaulAndriessenc, Marinko Toljić a, Ljupko Rundić a, Mihai N. Ducea d,e a University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining and Geology, Department of Regional Geology, Belgrade, Serbia b Utrecht University, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands c VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands d University of Arizona, Department of Geosciences, Tucson, AZ, USA e University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, Bucharest, Romania article info abstract Article history: The NE part of the Dinarides Mountain chain, located near their junction with the Carpatho-Balkanides, is an area Received 29 February 2016 where sedimentary basins associated with the Neotethys subduction and collision are still exposed. We per- Received in revised form 7 December 2016 formed a provenance study, based on detrital fission track thermochronology combined with zircon U\\Pb mag- Accepted 22 December 2016 matic geochronology, and existing studies of kinematics and exhumation. Our study shows rapid sedimentation Available online xxxx in the trench and forearc basin overlying the upper European tectonic plate. A number of latest Cretaceous–Early Paleocene igneous provenance ages show a dominant magmatic source area, derived from a Late Cretaceous sub- Keywords: Low-exhumation orogens duction-related arc. This arc shed short time lag sediments in the forearc and the trench system, possibly associ- Orogenic-driven extension ated with focused exhumation in the Serbo-Macedonian margin.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Isopods in the Western Carpathians
    PALACKÝ UNIVERSITY IN OLOMOUC Faculty of Science Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences Terrestrial isopods in the Western Carpathians Jana Štrichelová A thesis submitted to the Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, for the degree of Master of Science Supervisor: RNDr. & Mgr. Ivan H. Tuf, Ph.D. Olomouc 2010 © Jana Štrichelová, 2010 ii Štrichelová, J.: Suchozemské rovnakonôžky Západných Karpát. Diplomová práca. Katedra ekologie a životního prost ředí P řF UP v Olomouci, 37 strán, anglicky Abstrakt Predložená diplomová práca sa skladá z dvoch samostatných manuskriptov, pri čom obidva pojednávajú o suchozemských rovnakonôžkach v Západných Karpatoch. Prvý manuskript sa zaoberá spolo čenstvami suchozemských rovnakonožiek Bílých Karpát, s oh ľadom na ich rozšírenie v Západných Karpatoch. Výskum prebiehal na 26 lokalitách (lesné, lú čne aj zmiešané biotopy) a študovaní živo číchovia boli získavaní v období rokov 2003 až 2009 pomocou 4 metód odchytu: zemné pasce, tepelná extrakcia pôdnych vzoriek, tepelná extrakcia priesevov opadu a individuálny zber. Celkovo bolo zaznamenaných 16 druhov a boli nájdené bohaté spolo čenstvá (7-10 druhov na polovici lokalít). Medzi spolo čenstvami obývajúcimi lesy a spolo čenstvami lúk a pastvín existujú rozdiely. Armadillidium vulgare a Trachelipus rathkii prevládali na lúkach a pastvinách, zatia ľč o Protracheoniscus politus a Ligidium hypnorum dominovali v lesoch. Najzaujímavejšími faunistickými výsledkami boli nálezy 2 reliktných druhov a to karpatský endemit Hyloniscus mariae a Ligidium germanicum , ktorý má v Českej Republike len ploškovité rozšírenie. V druhom manuskripte sa pojednáva o spolo čenstvách suchozemských rovnakonožiek v dubovo-hrabových lesoch na území Bratislavy. Živo číchovia boli zbieraní pomocou metódy priesevu opadu v rokoch 1999, 2000, 2005 a 2006 na 8 lokalitách, pri čom vä čšina lokaliít prináleží Malých Karpatom.
    [Show full text]