DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 541 Parish Review DISTRICT OF EAST DEVON LOCAL GOVSHNMH1T BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOH ENGLAND RETORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell FRIGS FSVA MEMBERS Lady Ackner Mr G R Prentice Professor G E Cherry Mr K J L Newell Mr B Scholes OBE THE RT. HON. NICHOLAS RIDLEY MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT EAST DEVON PARISH REVIEW 1. On 10 December 1986 we submitted to you our Reports Nos. 521 and 522 following our consideration of the review of the City of Exeter's boundary with the Districts of East Devon and Teignbridge in the County of Devon, and of part of the parish review of the District of East Devon. 2. In our Report No. 522 we proposed the realignment of the boundary between the Parishes of Woodbury and Clyst St. George in order to place the village of Ebford within Clyst. St. George. \3e made this proposal under section 51 of the Local Government Act 1972 in advance of our other proposals on the East Devon parish review, with the request that the proposal be implemented concurrently with those on the District of Exeter boundary review if they were implemented. In your Department's letter of 3 April 1987 we were informed of your decision to make an Order under section 51(2) of the Act giving effect to the proposal set out in our Report No. 522 without modification. 3. We considered the District Council's parish review report, the Council's Working Party's report and associated comments, in accordance with the requirements of section 48(9) of the Act, together with the enclosed representations which were received direct, and which are listed in the attached Schedule A. Copies of the District Council's and the Council's Working Party's reports and supporting documents are enclosed. 4. Our Report No. 522 explained the reasons for our decision to exercise the powers conferred on us by section 48(9) of the 1972 Act to conduct our own review of the parish pattern of the district. In brief, the District Council had decided to make no recommendations to us. We had some reservations about this decision since we observed that the Council's Working Party had received many suggestions for change and the Council had indeed published draft recommendations affecting no fewer than 27 parishes. We therefore requested a copy of the Working Party's report, which the District Council supplied. This showed that, prima facie, some at least of the suggestions appeared to have merit. We therefore decided we should conduct our own review and so informed the District Council which took note of our decision. On 22 May 1985 we issued a consultation letter announcing the start of a review and publishing our draft proposals based on the Working Party's final recommendations. The letter was addressed to East Devon District Council: copies were sent to the County Council of Devon; all parishes within the district; the Member of Parliament for the constituency concerned; the headquarters of the main political parties; the editors both of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press; the local radio and television stations serving the area; and to individuals and organisations who had commented on the review. The start of the review was further publicised by notices in the local press and views were invited from members of the public and interested bodies. Comments were invited by 17 July 1985. 5. Our letter pointed out that the recommendations of the Council's Working Party had excluded some areas where new parishes might be created, particularly Exmouth, or where boundary changes might be made, and invited the District Council's comments on the representations which we had received in respect of those areas. Copies of the maps illustrating our draft proposals are enclosed, together with a copy of our draft proposals letter of 22 May 1985, which proposed changes in 37 areas. For ease of reference we have identified our draft proposals by area numbers, details of which are given in the attached Schedule B. The proposed changes affected the following parishes: Awliscombe Feniton Axminster Gittisham Axraouth Monkton Bicton Musbury Broadclyst Newton Poppleford Budleigh Salterton Qffwell Chardstock Otterton Clyst St. George Ottery St. Mary Clyst St. Mary Payhembury Colaton Raleigh Rockbeare Combpyne-Rousdon Talaton Cotleigh Uplyme Dunkeswell Widworthy East Budleigh Woodbury RESPONSE TO OUR DRAFT PROPOSALS 6. We received 48 comments in response to our draft proposals. A list of those who commented is given in the attached Schedule C, and the various comments are summarised below under the respective area numbers. The comments received in respect of our draft proposal for Area 36 affecting the boundaries of the Parishes of Uoodbury and Clyst St. George were dealt with in our Report No, 522. The County Council of Devon and the Parishes of Farway and Seaton stated that they had no comments to make on our draft proposals. (a) Areas Nos. 1 and 2 (Lympstone and Woodbury) 6.1 The District Council and the Parish of Woodbury supported both draft proposals. The Parish of Lympstone supported our draft proposal for Area 2, but opposed the proposal for Area 1 and instead suggested an alternative boundary which would result in a rather larger area being transferred to them from the Parish of Woodbury. (b) Areas Nos. 3. 4 and 5 fBudleigh Salterton and East Budleigh^ 6.2 The District Council supported our draft proposals but the Parish of East Budleigh with Bicton opposed all three on the grounds that the loss of Area 4 containing rateable hereditaments and land which might be developed would reduce their rate income. A resident of East Budleigh also opposed our proposals for Areas 3 and 4 and expressed concern over the financial consequences to Che Parish of East Budleigh with Bicton from the loss of Area 4. (c) Areas Nos. 6. 7. 8. 9 and 10 (East Budleigh. Budleigh Salterton and Otterton 6.3 The District Council and the Parishes of Otterton and Colaton Raleigh supported our draft proposals. (d) Areas Nos. 11 and 12 (Otterton. East Budleigh and Bicton) 6.4 The District Council supported both draft proposals. The Parish of East Budleigh with Bicton opposed them on the grounds that the they would lose rate income. The Parish of Otterton opposed our proposal for Area 11 and instead suggested an alternative boundary involving the transfer of land adjacent to the River Otter from the Parishes of Colaton Raleigh and East Budleigh to their parish. (e) Area No. 13 (East.Budleigh and Bictonl 6.5 The District Council supported our draft proposal, but the Parish Council of East Budleigh with Bicton opposed it and considered that as the Parishes of East Budleigh and Bicton had a common parish council it was unnecessary to alter the boundary between them. (f) Areas Nos. 14. 15 and 16 fColaton Raleigh, Otterton and Newton Poppleford and Harpfordl 6.6 The District Council and the Parishes of Colaton Raleigh and Otterton supported our draft proposals for these areas. (g) Areas Nos. 17. 18 and 19 fBroadclvst and Rockbeare) 6.7 The Parish of Broadclyst suggested an amendment to our draft proposals in order to realign the boundary between their parish and the Parish of Rockbeare to the line of the stream called Cranna, instead of the London - Exeter railway line adopted in our draft proposals. The District Council supported this amendment. The Parish of Rockbeare supported our draft proposals but suggested an amendment in respect of the proposal for Area 17 in order to include the property known as Stone Villa within their parish. Mr R K Taylor, a County Councillor, supported the amendment suggested. (h) Araes _ tjos.... 20 and 21 CFenitonand Pavhemburv') 6.8 The District Council stated that they would only support a change if the different boundaries agreed by their Working Party were adopted instead. The Parish of Payherabury supported our draft proposal. (I) Areas Nos. 22 (Dunkeswell and AwliscQ_mb_el_ and 23 and 24 JLMonkton and Cotleigh) 6.9 The District Council supported our draft proposals for these areas, (j) Areas Nos. 25 and 26 CWidworthv and Offwell) 6.10 The District Council and the Parish of Widworthy supported our draft proposals for these areas. (k) Area_No. 27 (Axmouth and Combpyne-Rousdon) 6.11 The Parish of Combpyne-Rousdon suggested an amendment to our draft proposal which would increase the amount of land to be transferred to them from the Parish of Axmouth. The District Council supported this amendment. The Parish of Axmouth opposed our draft proposal mainly on the grounds of the financial loss to their parish. (1) Area No. 28 (Combpyne-Rousdon and Uplyme) 6.12 The District Council supported our draft proposal. The Parish of Combpyne-Rousdon opposed this proposal and felt that there was no good reason to change the present boundary, particularly as most of the land involved belonged to farms situated within Corabpyne-Rousdon. (m) Areas Nos. 29 and 30 (Musburv. Combpnve-Rousdon and Uplvme) 6.13 The District Council supported both draft proposals but the Parish of Combpyne-Rousdon supported the draft proposal for Area 29 only. The Parish of Musbury opposed the draft proposal for Area 29 and saw no valid reason for the transfer of the area to Combpyne-Rousdon. (n) Areas Nos. 31 and 32 (Uplvme and Axminster) 6.14 The District Council supported both draft proposals, (o) Area No. 33 CChardstock') 6.15 The District Council supported our draft proposal for the creation of a new parish of All Saints from part of the existing Parish of Chardstock.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uplyme Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2031
    Uplyme Neighbourhood Plan Uplyme Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2031 Uplyme Parish Council July 2017 Uplyme village centre seen from Horseman's Hill Page 1 of 62 July 2017 Uplyme Neighbourhood Plan Foreword Welcome to the Uplyme Neighbourhood Plan! Neighbourhood Development Plans were introduced by the 2011 Localism Act, to give local people more say about the scale and nature of development in their area, within the context of both strategic planning policy in the National Planning Policy Framework 2012, and local plans – in our case, the adopted East Devon Local Plan 2013-2031. The Uplyme Neighbourhood Plan relates to the whole of the Parish and includes a wide range of topics: housing, employment, community facilities, transport, and the built and natural environment. The Plan will run until 2031 to coincide with the end date of the Local Plan, but may need to be reviewed before then. The Plan has been drafted by local people in the Uplyme Neighbourhood Plan Group, following extensive community consultation and engagement over a period of years, followed by an examination by an independent Planning Inspector. We believe that the plan represents a broad consensus of local opinion. Chris James Chair Uplyme Parish Council & Neighbourhood Plan Group July 2017 Dedication This Plan is dedicated to the memory of Peter Roy Whiting, former Chairman of both the Parish Council and the Neighbourhood Plan Group. Without his encyclopaedic technical knowledge of planning and civil engineering, his puckish wit, enthusiasm and dedication, the project would have struggled in its formative stage. Peter – your presence is sadly missed. Page 2 of 62 July 2017 Uplyme Neighbourhood Plan Conventions Policies in this Plan are included in blue-shaded boxes thus: The policy number and title are shown at the top The policy wording appears here as the main body.
    [Show full text]
  • Excursion to Lyme Regis, Easter, 1906
    320 EXCURSION TO LYME REGIS, EASTER, 1906. pebbles and bed NO.3 seemed, however, to be below their place. The succession seemed, however,to be as above, and, if that be so, the beds below bed I are probably Bagshot Beds. "The pit at the lower level has been already noticed in our Proceedings; cj. H. W. Monckton and R. S. Herries 'On some Bagshot Pebble Beds and Pebble Gravel,' Proc. Ceol. Assoc., vol. xi, p. 13, at p. 22. The pit has been worked farther back, and the clay is now in consequence thicker. Less of the under­ lying sand is exposed than it was in June, 1888. "The casts of shells which occur in this sand were not abundant, but several were found by members of the party on a small heap of sand at the bottom of the pit." Similarly disturbed strata were again observed in the excavation for the new reservoir close by. A few minutes were then profitably spent in examining Fryerning Church, and its carved Twelfth Century font, etc. At the Spread Eagle a welcome tea awaited the party, which, after thanking the Director, returned by the 7.55 p.m. train to London. REFERENCES. Geological Survey Map, Sheet 1 (Drift). 1889. WHITAKER, W.-I< Geology of London," vol. i, pp. 259, 266. &c. 1889. MONCKTON, H. W., and HERRIES, R. S.-I< On Some Bagshot Pebble Beds and Pebble Gravel," Proc, Geo], Assoc., vol, xi, p. 13. 1904. SALTER, A. E.-" On the Superficial Deposits of Central and Southern England," Proc. Ceo!. Assoc., vol.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Otter View 1 Otter View
    1 Otter View 1 Otter View Gore Lane, Lyme Regis, Dorset, DT7 3TE Lyme Regis 1 Mile Axminster 4 Miles Bridport 12 Miles An endearing semi-detached cottage in a tucked away position within easy reach of Lyme Regis. • 1930s Cottage • Beautifully Presented • Nearby Single Garage and • 2 Double Bedrooms Parking • Charming Gardens • Character Features Guide price £289,950 THE PROPERTY 1 Otter View is a delightful semi-detached cottage located in a tucked away, elevated position within the popular village of Uplyme and therefore enjoying close proximity to Lyme Regis. The property dates back to the 1930s and features several of the hall marks of this period of architecture including high ceilings, large windows, panelled doors and exposed floorboards in the sitting room. Under the current ownership, which has lasted since 2008, the property has been improved and maintained to a high standard yet with sympathy to the building's history, thus preserving and enhancing charming character features such as the fireplace with multi-fuel stove and the wood panelling. The accommodation is light and well proportioned throughout with the rooms arranged in a simple, classical layout. The front door opens into a most appealing sitting room with a comfortable yet stylish atmosphere. Adjoining this is the kitchen/dining room which features cottage-style wooden units beneath beech work surfaces with spaces for all the usual appliances. The conservatory, which overlooks the rear garden, has a wonderful air of tranquility and is therefore ideal for a number of uses including a second reception room, studio or garden room. Upstairs there are two generous double bedrooms, one of which enjoys beautiful country views to the rear, and the bathroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Lovely River Otter Looking Over the Flower Baskets on Tipton St John Bridge Photo: Thanks to Jeff Chapman
    Newton Poppleford Harpford & Colaton Raleigh Our lovely River Otter looking over the flower baskets on Tipton St John bridge photo: thanks to Jeff Chapman St Luke St Gregory the Great St John the Baptist Newton Poppleford Harpford (BCP) Colaton Raleigh "Normal" Sunday services are unlikely to be happening for some while yet. A Sunday service on 'Zoom' is held at 10.00am each Sunday mainly for the congregations of Mark's 'patch' – the parishes of Newton Poppleford, Harpford, Colaton Raleigh and Tipton St John with Venn Ottery – though anyone with internet access is welcome to join in. Email Mark Ward (as below) to receive the link to join in. Ring a friend if you don't know how to use Zoom – more than half the population have learnt how to use it in the last few months. Mark is planning to follow this each Sunday with a simple said service in St Luke's Church, Newton Poppleford at 11.00am. Of course, this will have to follow the safety rules – hand sanitising on entry and exit, social distancing and wearing of face covering. No singing is permitted, so it won't be 'returning to normal' At present, chairs are set out at 2 metre distancing, so there is only space for some 20 people (depending on how many come as couples or family groups). You'll be welcomed if you do come, but please obey any instructions from the steward, and don't be disappointed if there is not enough room to fit you in safely. Colaton Raleigh Church is open for private prayer a couple of mornings a week – see the notice board on the church gate for updated days and times, and please respect the safety and distancing rules.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fab Link Limited (Budleigh Salterton to Broadclyst)
    THE FAB LINK LIMITED (BUDLEIGH SALTERTON TO BROADCLYST) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2016 The Electricity Act 1989 and The Acquisition of Land Act 1981 FAB Link Limited (incorporated and registered in Guernsey with company number 54637 whose registered office is at Glategny Court, Glategny Esplanade, St Peter Port, Guernsey GY1 1WR) (in this order called "the acquiring authority") makes the following order: 1. Subject to the provisions of this order, the acquiring authority is, under section 10 of and paragraph 1 of Schedule 3 to the Electricity Act 1989, hereby authorised to purchase compulsorily the land and the new rights over land described in paragraph 2 for the purpose of carrying out the activities authorised by its licence under the Electricity Act 1989 and more particularly for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a high voltage electrical interconnector, including a converter station and associated works between Budleigh Salterton and Broadclyst in the County of Devon to allow the transfer of electrical power beneath the English Channel between the United Kingdom and France passing through the territories of Guernsey and Alderney. 2. (1) The land authorised to be purchased compulsorily under this order is the land described in the Schedule and delineated and shown coloured pink on the maps prepared in duplicate, sealed with the common seal of the acquiring authority and marked "Maps referred to in the FAB Link Limited (Budleigh Salterton to Broadclyst) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016". (2) The new rights to be purchased compulsorily over land under this order are described in the Schedule and the land is shown coloured blue, coloured brown and coloured blue and hatched brown on the said maps.
    [Show full text]
  • 9A Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    9A bus time schedule & line map 9A Exeter City Centre View In Website Mode The 9A bus line (Exeter City Centre) has 5 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Exeter City Centre: 6:25 AM - 7:47 PM (2) Lyme Regis: 5:33 AM - 7:05 PM (3) Seaton: 5:56 AM - 6:16 AM (4) Sidford: 4:00 PM (5) Sidmouth: 6:47 PM - 8:47 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 9A bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 9A bus arriving. Direction: Exeter City Centre 9A bus Time Schedule 91 stops Exeter City Centre Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 8:22 AM - 6:06 PM Monday 6:25 AM - 7:47 PM King's Way, Lyme Regis Tuesday 6:25 AM - 7:47 PM Cloverdale Court, Lyme Regis Wednesday 6:25 AM - 7:47 PM The Square, Lyme Regis Thursday 6:25 AM - 7:47 PM 67 Broad Street, Lyme Regis Friday 6:25 AM - 7:47 PM Langmoor Gardens Temp, Lyme Regis Langmoor Close, Lyme Regis Saturday 6:17 AM - 7:42 PM Holm Bush Car Park, Lyme Regis Ware Lane, Lyme Regis 9A bus Info Somers Road, Lyme Regis Direction: Exeter City Centre Stops: 91 Ware Cross, Pinhay Trip Duration: 118 min Ware Lane, Uplyme Civil Parish Line Summary: King's Way, Lyme Regis, Cloverdale Court, Lyme Regis, The Square, Lyme Regis, Pinhay Hollow, Pinhay Langmoor Gardens Temp, Lyme Regis, Holm Bush Car Park, Lyme Regis, Ware Lane, Lyme Regis, Charton Cross, Rousdon Somers Road, Lyme Regis, Ware Cross, Pinhay, Pinhay Hollow, Pinhay, Charton Cross, Rousdon, Garage, Rousdon, Westhayes Caravan Site, Garage, Rousdon Combpyne, Boshill Cross, Colyford, Ship Inn, Combpyne Lane, Combpyne Rousdon Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Lower River Otter Options
    Haycock, Suite 1, Deer Park Business Centre, Eckington, Pershore, Worcestershire, WR10 3DN t +44 (0)1386 750642 e [email protected] www.haycock-associates.co.uk Lower River Otter: Long term options for drainage and flood management Client Clinton Devon Estates Author Dr. N.E. Haycock Date 18th December 2009 updated 16th February 2010 Version 3 rivers soils hydrology landscapes Haycock Associates Limited. Registered in England No. 03934665 VAT No. GB 658 1644 14 Registered office: Red Roof, Wick Road, Little Comberton, Pershore, Worcestershire WR10 3EG. Haycock Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Aims of the Report 2 Introduction 2 Background 4 Catchment Topography and Geology 4 Lower Otter Topography and Geology 6 Catchment Hydrology 8 Current Drainage Layout 10 Recorded Flood Events 12 Tidal Levels and Data and its Current Influence 16 Historical Periods and Accounts of the Lower Otter Valley 18 Hydraulic Model of the Lower Otter Valley 20 Flood Dynamics - Fluvial 20 Flood Dynamics - Tidal 25 Flood Dynamics - Drainage 29 Predicted Sea Level and Flood Regime 29 Conclusions Arising from the Simulation Flood Models. 30 Long Term Options for Drainage and Flood Management 31 Option A - Cricket Ground Bund 32 Option B - Relocation of Cricket Ground 34 Haycock Option C - South Farm Road 35 Option D - River Otter floodplain at White Bridge. 37 Option E - Southern Big Marsh (linked to option B, C and D). 38 Option F - Northern Big Marsh 40 Option K - River Otter Big Bank Reach 42 Option G - Little Bank and Swale 43 Option H - Otterton Mill and Otterton Bridge 44 Summary of Options - Table 5 47 Overview and recommendations 48 Key Documentation 49 Appendix A: Long section through the Lime Kiln Culvert (Howick and Partners, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Parishscapes Project PNNU –PNON YF>C<>C< H=: E6GH HD A>;: Evaluation Report J<KDLCL><J@L C<L =@@H LNJJIKM@? =P Contents a6>C F:EDFH Glossary of Abbreviations Used in This Report R O Project Background S P Project Aims and Achievements T Q Structure and Delivery V R Overview of Outputs OP S Quantative Evaluation PO T Qualitative Evaluation PR U Conclusions and Acknowledgements QW Appendices: X School Tithe Map Workshop – St Peter’s Primary School RP Y Emails and Feedback from a Range of Contacts RS Z Apportionment Guidelines SS [ Finances SU \L86J6H>DC D; 6 9:G:FH:9 8DHH6<: 6H fIBB:F9DKC ]6FB, bDFH=A:><=, [:JDC List of Figures and Image Acknowledgements TN O Abstract TO P Introduction TP Q The Survey and the Site Before Excavation TR R The Geophysical Survey by Richard Sandover TU S The Excavation UN T The Pottery UV U The Metalwork VP V Building Materials, Glass and Faunal Remains VS W Worked Stone and Flint VU ON The Documentary Evidence by Ron Woodcock and Philippe Planel WN OO Lees Cottage and the Surrounding Landscape WT OP Acknowledgements and References WV Parishscapes Project PNNU –PNON YF>C<>C< H=: E6GH HD A>;: Main Report ^ADGG6FM D; 677F:J>6H>DCG BFILL<KP IA <==K@OD<MDIHL NL@? DH MCDL K@JIKM "! Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Apportionment The supporting recording sheets for the tithe maps Devon County Council #" Devon Record Office East Devon District Council Geo-rectification Modifying boundaries of old maps to fit modern day electronic maps $ Geographical Information System – digitally mapped information #/$ Historic Environment Record/Service – record based in ?>> % Information Technology – the service/use of computers and electronic equipment for information Polygonisation Assigning information to individual parcels (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVONSHIRE. FAR 857 Daniel Wm
    TRADES DmECTORY.] DEVONSHIRE. FAR 857 Daniel Wm. West Youlden, Holsworthy Davey Thomas, Edhill, Farway, Honiton1Dendle William, Sandford, Crediton Danie!William, Willia Thome, Holswrthy Davey'f.Qnarterley,Exe bridge, Tiverton Denner Mrs. Jane, Payhembury, Ottery DanielsD.Luton,Broadhembury,Honiton Davey William, Emsworthy, Broad wood St. Mary Daniels Jn. Gilscot, Alwington,Hideford Widger, Lifton R.S.O DennerWilliam,Broadhembury,Honiton Daniels Patrick,Dawes,Feniton, Honiton Davey William, Higher Hawkerland, Denner William, Southdown, Salcombe Daniels Stephen,Horralake,Inwardleigh, Woodbury Salterton Regis, Sidmouth Exboorne R.S.O Davey William, Middle Rowden, Samp· Denning Daniel, Exeter hill, Cullomptoo Daniels William, Higher Tale, Payhem- ford Courtenay R.S.O Dennis Miss Charlotte, West Worth~ bury, Ottery St. Mary Davey William,Nortb Bet worthy, Buck's North Lew, Beaworthy R.S.O Daniels Wm.Marsh,Clyst Hydon,Exeter mills, Bideford Dennis Edwin, Woodland, Ivybridge Darby Lewis, Karswell, Hockworthy, DaveyW. Youlden,Sth.Tawtn.Okehmptn DennisFras.Venton,HighHamptonR.S.O Wellington (Somerset) Da vieJn.N orthleigh,Goodleigh,Barnstple DennisG. Sticklepath, Tawstock,Barnstpl Darch Henry, Lincombe, Ilfracombe Davies Jas.Hoemore,Up.Ottery,Honiton Dennis George, 'fhorn, Hridford, Exeter Darcb Jas. Horrymill, Winkleigh R.S.O Davies Joseph, Stourton, 'fhelbridge, Dennis Henry, Odam & Lower Coombe, Darch John, Indicknowl, Combmartin, Morchard Bishop R.S.O High Hampton R.S.O Barnstaple Davies Samuel, Beam, Great Torrington Dennis Henry, PiU head,
    [Show full text]
  • DEVONSHIRE. 'IAI 993 Harris Lewis, London House, Higher Jeffery John, 94 Paris Street, Exetel' Manfield Alfred James, New St
    TRADES DIRECTORY.] DEVONSHIRE. 'IAI 993 Harris Lewis, London house, Higher Jeffery John, 94 Paris street, Exetel' Manfield Alfred James, New st. Honitoll square, Holsworthy · Jeffery .Johu...'\;icks,r06Wi.Dner st.Paigntn :\fanley H.TheSquare, Uffculme,Cllmptn Harris Sylvester, Broadclyst, Exeter tJenkins Josiah, Colscott, West Putrord, :Niartin lrilliam, Clawton, llolsworthy Harris Wiltiam, Foss street, Dartmouth Brandis Corner R.S.O Maton Job, 63 Geor~e street, Plymouth Harris Wm. Thos.Hollatld st. Barnstaple Jervis William, Square, Barnstaple .1\'Iatt.hcws Jas. Gilbert,,Strand, Exmonth t HarveyG. Post office, Whitfrd.Axmin:;tr J er wood A.J. High st. Hatherleigh R.S. 0 MatthewsT. 201\Ielbourne st.Friars,Exetr HarveyGeo.Louis,;roBrunswick sq.Torqy' Jewell Frederick James, 3 Salem place, Matthews William, Instow R.S.O Harvey Miss Mary Ann, ro Rooorts Black Boy road, Exeter May Jn.8 Staddon ter. North rd.Plymth road, Larkbeare, Exeter Jewell J. I4 Eaton 'pl. Heavitree rd.Exetr Maynard William, Roborough R..S.O Harvey W.7Tamar rd.Moricetn.Devnpt Jewel! Wm. North BoYey, Newton Abbot Melhuish E. Fore street, Tiverton Hatswell John, Passmore's court, Towns- J ohnson Alfd.Jas. Beach, l:lrixharo R.S. 0 Melhuish Geo. 3 Centre st. Friars, Exeter ead, Tiverton Joaiffe 0. &J. 32 Tavistock st.Devooport .Membury Charles, 20 Albert.st. Exeter Hattin James, SandfDrd, Crediton JollowJames H. & Co.Fore st. Topsham Meneer George, 42 Princes rd. Torquay Hawkins John, 25 West street, Exeter Jones Thomas, Cbilsworthy,Holsworthy Merchant John, Dunkeswell, Honilon Hawkridge William, Town Hall place, Keast William, 2I Gibbons st. Plymouth Metters Jonathan,22Chapel st.'favistock Bovey Tracey, Newton Abbot Keene Edwin, I Centre st.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Exeter Strategic Plan Issues Report Summary of Responses
    Greater Exeter Strategic Plan Issues Report Summary of Responses Introduction The councils of East Devon, Exeter, Mid Devon and Teignbridge consulted on an “Issues” paper in February 2017 designed to stimulate debate early in the process of preparing the Greater Exeter Strategic Plan. The questions were deliberately broad and non-specific, and therefore the comments received have inevitably been wide ranging. It is therefore appropriate to publish a reasonably full summary of the responses, rather than to attempt to bring them all together into a more general summary which could lose some of the finer points raised. The full responses can be found at https://www.gesp.org.uk/consultations/issues/ It is not currently possible to provide a full response to each comment at this stage, in advance of the publication of the draft plan. This summary is therefore an interim one, pending further work on the plan. However, the comments will be taken into account during the preparation of the draft GESP and a fuller response provided with the draft’s publication. Therefore, any point made has been noted and is being actively considered, even in the absence of a specific comment. A revised summary will be published with a fuller set of notes/responses alongside the draft GESP. In the meantime, where a technical comment can be made which does not prejudge the contents of the draft plan this is provided below in the “notes” column. You said Organisation/Individual Notes 1 Do you have any comments on the content of the Greater Exeter Strategic Plan and its relationship with other plans? Support GESP Supports generally Exeter Cycling Campaign (357); Gladman Developments Limited (160); IJP (261); ); Individuals – Exeter (100); East Devon (308); Jillings Heynes Planning (332); Pegasus Group on behalf of Lightwood Land (358); Teignbridge (198); Torbay Council (275); Vail Williams for Gleeson Developments Limited (372); WYG (146).
    [Show full text]
  • Black's Guide to Devonshire
    $PI|c>y » ^ EXETt R : STOI Lundrvl.^ I y. fCamelford x Ho Town 24j Tfe<n i/ lisbeard-- 9 5 =553 v 'Suuiland,ntjuUffl " < t,,, w;, #j A~ 15 g -- - •$3*^:y&« . Pui l,i<fkl-W>«? uoi- "'"/;< errtland I . V. ',,, {BabburomheBay 109 f ^Torquaylll • 4 TorBa,, x L > \ * Vj I N DEX MAP TO ACCOMPANY BLACKS GriDE T'i c Q V\ kk&et, ii £FC Sote . 77f/? numbers after the names refer to the page in GuidcBook where die- description is to be found.. Hack Edinburgh. BEQUEST OF REV. CANON SCADDING. D. D. TORONTO. 1901. BLACK'S GUIDE TO DEVONSHIRE. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/blacksguidetodevOOedin *&,* BLACK'S GUIDE TO DEVONSHIRE TENTH EDITION miti) fffaps an* Hlustrations ^ . P, EDINBURGH ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK 1879 CLUE INDEX TO THE CHIEF PLACES IN DEVONSHIRE. For General Index see Page 285. Axniinster, 160. Hfracombe, 152. Babbicombe, 109. Kent Hole, 113. Barnstaple, 209. Kingswear, 119. Berry Pomeroy, 269. Lydford, 226. Bideford, 147. Lynmouth, 155. Bridge-water, 277. Lynton, 156. Brixham, 115. Moreton Hampstead, 250. Buckfastleigh, 263. Xewton Abbot, 270. Bude Haven, 223. Okehampton, 203. Budleigh-Salterton, 170. Paignton, 114. Chudleigh, 268. Plymouth, 121. Cock's Tor, 248. Plympton, 143. Dartmoor, 242. Saltash, 142. Dartmouth, 117. Sidmouth, 99. Dart River, 116. Tamar, River, 273. ' Dawlish, 106. Taunton, 277. Devonport, 133. Tavistock, 230. Eddystone Lighthouse, 138. Tavy, 238. Exe, The, 190. Teignmouth, 107. Exeter, 173. Tiverton, 195. Exmoor Forest, 159. Torquay, 111. Exmouth, 101. Totnes, 260. Harewood House, 233. Ugbrooke, 10P.
    [Show full text]