Vol37 No2 13 29.Pdf (1.038Mb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vol37 No2 13 29.Pdf (1.038Mb) t hematic dossier | dossier thématique h umouring the humours an introduction to the comedic gothic of cram and goodhue in the united states and canada CM A eRON ACDONeLL is a doctoral candidate > caMeron in the history and theory of architecture at Macdonell McGill University’s School of Architecture. he is preparing to defend his dissertation on the interdisciplinarity of modern Gothic architecture and Gothic literature. Most recently, he (with his hen Kenneth Clark summarized doctoral supervisor, Martin Bressani) published an Whis landmark study of The Gothic article on the speculative diagnosis of Augustus Revival (1928), he argued that “Gothic depends on detail, and the individual Welby Northmore Pugin’s syphilis and its effect architect, however gifted, is powerless on Pugin’s conceptualization of architectural health without a body of good craftsmen.”1 and illness. he is also preparing articles on the Clark admitted, of course, that there Anglo-Catholicism of Ralph Adams Cram’s Gothic were some technically skilled artisans in literature, and a deconstruction of the gifts of the the Gothic Revival; but they could not, in magi as a Christian economy of salvation. his estimation, capture the “irrecoverable moods” of authentic Gothic ornaments that sprang “spontaneously from senti- ment.”2 Clark concluded of the Gothic Revival thusly: their detail never ceased to be tame and self-conscious. Their madonnas were always genteel, their saints always venerable, but- ter would not melt in their angels’ mouths; and the awful events of the Apocalypse were conducted with the decorum of a gar- den party.3 In other words, the tepid and all-too-sin- cere piety of the Gothic Revival doomed its architecture to lack the requisite moods of medieval sentiment: a sense of awe, on the one hand, and a sense of humour on the other—the same sense of humour, ironically, that Clark used to mock the “garden party” decorum of a modern Gothic Apocalypse. Perhaps, in an age of scientific enlight- enment and reasonable doubt, it is fair to say that modern Gothic architects and artisans could not hope to achieve the awful fear of hell that Clark deemed essential to apocalyptic medieval carv- ings. But, were Gothic Revival churches really so humourless? To be sure, there remains a posthumous perception that F tiG. 1. he new st. mary’s anGLiCan ChurCh, waLkerviLLe, on. | Cameron maCdoneLL. JSSAC | JSÉAC 37 > No 2 > 2012 > 13-29 13 caMeron Macdonell > t hematic dossier | dossier thématique medieval Christians took their religion too because Cram and Goodhue’s Gothic was a day when wives gave birth to babes seriously to allow comedy to sully their international, they designed and lectured / And nurtured them for heroes: not to churches.4 And thus, under the influence in both the United States and Canada, rats / That waxed to bloated vermin. Fat of that perception, some modern Gothic their sense of humour transcended the with spleen, / Yellow with jealousy, ye artists may have striven to revive the sin- national border. And, through the study barter life, / England and honour for your cerity of medieval faith at the expense of of ornaments from various American belching pride.”10 Implicitly, Cram was its comedy; but certainly not all of them. commissions, I shall contextualize the referring to the yellow bile of the chol- In a 1930 preface to a book on Gothic gar- comedic details in a Canadian church eric humour, originating in the spleen goyles, American architect Ralph Adams Cram and Goodhue designed: the new and causing jealousy and the indiges- Cram (1863-1942) specifically fought St. Mary’s Anglican Church (1902-1904) tion of “belching pride.” Furthermore, against that sombre perception: in Walkerville, Ontario (fig. 1).8 when Arthur accused the controlling Merlin of having an “o’erriding spleen,” Just because [the medieval faithful] were Long before his 1930 preface, Cram was Merlin retorted: “No wanton humour a sincerely religious people and involved in already celebrating the mirth of medieval leads me.”11 Likewise, when trying to the sacraments, services and practises of artisans. Concerning the construction of a stimulate the passions of his audience, their religion from the day of birth to that of medieval church, he wrote: “All over the Cram revelled in the chivalry of Arthurian death—and after—it is [wrongly] assumed exterior the stone masons, not unthink- romance, stating that Arthur and his that this must have knocked all the gaiety ing mechanics at so many dollars a day, knights “still stir our blood... still rouse out of life and that they must have been sad, wrought out their fancies, their ideals, in us answering humours.”12 Finally, con- terror-struck and morose.5 even their merry humors, through the cerning his comprehension of the med- stubborn but enduring medium of sand- ical humours and Gothic architecture, On the contrary, Cram insisted that, stone and marble.”9 This essay pursues Cram stated that English Gothic was a the pun implicit to Cram’s plural desig- “splendid record of the hopes and visions i n the Middle Ages religion was a natural nation of the humours. Cram was not and wholesome humours of a race of and a companionable and a familiar thing, being redundant when he celebrated active, enthusiastic, healthy Christian laughter was not averse from it, nor was the “merry humors” of medieval masons. men.”13 The wholesome humours of the joking, even sometimes of rather a broad Rather, he was calling attention to the Anglo-Gothic body were healthy. sort, out of the question in relation to what fact that our sense of the word humour we should consider “serious matters.” (meaning merriment) comes from the old As Cram’s references to the spleen, fat hence churches... broke out into delight- medical conceptualization of the human with choler, and the rousing humours of ful gaiety here and there under the hands body as a vessel for the four humours. the blood indicate, it was also believed of high-spirited or waggish workmen, and For Cram, humour and the humours were that a disproportionate amount of one they, and the religion they expressed, were interconnected. or more of the humours affected one’s the better for the wholesome sense of life.6 temperament. Hence, an excess of blood Stemming from a Latin designation for meant a passionate personality, an excess This essay consequently explores Cram’s wetness, the humours were categor- of phlegm meant an indolent personality, effort to bring a wholesome sense of ized in ancient, medieval, and early an excess of choler meant an irascible per- life to the décor of his Gothic Revival modern medical discourses as fluids in sonality, and an excess of black bile meant architecture via the use of comedy. He the human body. Accordingly, the four a melancholic personality. For instance, and his sometime architectural partner, humours were sanguine (blood), phleg- in William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, Bertram Goodhue (1869-1924), were matic (phlegm), choleric (yellow bile or the titular protagonist wore the antic founding members of the Society of Arts choler), and melancholic (black bile). As disposition of someone who had gone and Crafts in Boston; and thus, they had such, when Cram wrote his Arthurian mad with melancholy, and the king sum- aligned themselves with some of the most epic, Excalibur, he demonstrated his com- moned Hamlet’s friends, Rosencrantz and technically skilled artisans of the day to prehension of humoral medical theor- Guildenstern, who were “so neighboured create modern Gothic ornaments that ies. His protagonist, Merlin, lamented to [Hamlet’s] youth and humour” that were not tepidly pious, but playful and, at the English barons who quibbled over they might “draw him on to pleasures.”14 times, playfully irreverent.7 Furthermore, Arthur’s royal coronation: “There was In other words, the king had hoped that 14 JSSAC | JSÉAC 37 > No 2 > 2012 caMeron Macdonell > t hematic dossier | dossier thématique F piG. 2. uLpit at ConCordia Lutheran ChurCh, F riG. 3. eLief CarvinGs of animaLs from the frieze (above) and pLinth (beLow) of the puLpit at ConCordia LouisviLLe, ky. | Cameron maCdoneLL. Lutheran ChurCh, LouisviLLe, ky. | CrystaL maCdoneLL. Hamlet’s melancholic temperament would humour. If the choleric humour is iras- necessity of the plinth. However, on closer be corrected if Hamlet kept company with cible, then it is sated with the vitriol of inspection, one such relief (a bounty of friends from his prior “humour,” from the satire. And, if the bilious humour is mel- oak leaves and acorns) includes a mouse days before he went mad. Indeed, when ancholic, then it dwells on the brink of that is found pausing on the branch Hamlet reunited with Rosencrantz and dark comedy. These humours, however, (fig. 3). Exploiting the rigidity of sculp- Guildenstern, they shared a bawdy joke are not to be treated as rigid categories. ture, the artisan depicted the mouse fro- that seemed to change Hamlet’s mood— I would rather suggest that we humour zen in animal caution, staring out at us albeit momentarily. And so, by that theory the humours by treating them as a series for all time, waiting to finish the acorn of the humours (though not to be limited of complexions that frequently flow from it plucked from the now visibly empty to Shakespeare), the modern use of the one to another. shell. Likewise, at the top of the pulpit, word humour arose—the idea that the the sculptor carved a continual frieze of “pleasures” of comedy could affect the s anguine humour vegetation (grapevines, this time) with a humour or mood of an individual or, by bird picking the vineyard clean of a cater- that same token, that a person’s humour Of all the different complexions avail- pillar.
Recommended publications
  • Casa Del Prado in Balboa Park
    Chapter 19 HISTORY OF THE CASA DEL PRADO IN BALBOA PARK Of buildings remaining from the 1915 Panama-California Exposition, exhibit buildings north of El Prado in the agricultural section survived for many years. They were eventually absorbed by the San Diego Zoo. Buildings south of El Prado were gone by 1933, except for the New Mexico and Kansas Buildings. These survive today as the Balboa Park Club and the House of Italy. This left intact the Spanish-Colonial complex along El Prado, the main east-west avenue that separated north from south sections The Sacramento Valley Building, at the head of the Plaza de Panama in the approximate center of El Prado, was demolished in 1923 to make way for the Fine Arts Gallery. The Southern California Counties Building burned down in 1925. The San Joaquin Valley and the Kern-Tulare Counties Building, on the promenade south of the Plaza de Panama, were torn down in 1933. When the Science and Education and Home Economy buildings were razed in 1962, the only 1915 Exposition buildings on El Prado were the California Building and its annexes, the House of Charm, the House of Hospitality, the Botanical Building, the Electric Building, and the Food and Beverage Building. This paper will describe the ups and downs of the 1915 Varied Industries and Food Products Building (1935 Food and Beverage Building), today the Casa del Prado. When first conceived the Varied Industries and Food Products Building was called the Agriculture and Horticulture Building. The name was changed to conform to exhibits inside the building.
    [Show full text]
  • An Article Hy Mr. Ralph Adams Cram on His Preliminary Studies for Residence Halls at Cor- Nell, with a Map and Two of His Sketches
    VOL. XIV. No. 17. ITHACA, NEW YORK. JANUARY 31, 1912. An article hy Mr. Ralph Adams Cram on His Preliminary Studies for Residence Halls at Cor- nell, with a Map and Two of His Sketches. PRICE TEN CENTS CORNELL ALUMNI NEWS The Farmers' Loan & Trust Company "Shifting of Investments ff 16. 18. 20. 22 WiBam St.. N. Y. Branoίi 475 5* Ave. Solid Steel Windows LONDON J '5 Cockspur St., S. W. An article by for 126 ow BroaclS t( E c Albert R. Gallatin Mills, factories, car shops, power PARIS 41 Boulevard Haussmann. houses, etc. Every holder of securities, if properly also LETTERS OF CREDIT FOREIGN EXCHANGE advised, could profit by following the Crittall Steel Casement CABLE TRANSFERS precepts of this article. It treats not with THEORY, but FACTS gained Windows from actual and profitable experience. for residences, office buildings, insti- tutions, banks, etc., where a substan- Copies sent on request tial and artistic effect is desired. R. A. Heggie & Bro.Co. SfflMlDT&(|ALLATIN. Detroit Steel Products Co. 1 35 East State St., Ithaca. Detroit, Michigan. 111 Broadway, New York J. Prentice Kellogg \ Members of the JEWELERS Frederic Gallatin, Jr. > New York C. L. Inslee *95, President. W. W. Ricker *96, Trf . f Cbas. H. Blair, Jr, (0. ϋ. 98) J Stock Exchange W.G. Hudson'97, Vice-Pres. E.Burns, Jr..Ό3.Chίef Ea. and makers of special Cor- Geo. P. Schmidt Albert R. Gallatin nell goods. Watches and Guarantee Construction Co. diamonds a specialty. Contracting Engineers: Specialists in the design and construc- tion of conveying systems for the hand- The Mercersburg Jlcademy ling of coal and other materials.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Bartholomew's Church and Community House: Draft Nomination
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 ST. BARTHOLOMEW’S CHURCH AND COMMUNITY HOUSE Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: St. Bartholomew’s Church and Community House Other Name/Site Number: 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 325 Park Avenue (previous mailing address: 109 East 50th Street) Not for publication: City/Town: New York Vicinity: State: New York County: New York Code: 061 Zip Code: 10022 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): _X_ Public-Local: District: Public-State: Site: Public-Federal: Structure: Object: Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 buildings sites structures objects 1 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 2 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: DRAFT NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 ST. BARTHOLOMEW’S CHURCH AND COMMUNITY HOUSE Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ____ meets ____ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspired by Mexico: Architect Bertram Goodhue Introduces Spanish Colonial Revival Into Balboa Park
    Inspired by Mexico: Architect Bertram Goodhue Introduces Spanish Colonial Revival into Balboa Park By Iris H.W. Engstrand G. Aubrey Davidson’s laudatory address to an excited crowd attending the opening of the Panama-California Exposition on January 1, 1915, gave no inkling that the Spanish Colonial architectural legacy that is so familiar to San Diegans today was ever in doubt. The buildings of this exposition have not been thrown up with the careless unconcern that characterizes a transient pleasure resort. They are part of the surroundings, with the aspect of permanence and far-seeing design...Here is pictured this happy combination of splendid temples, the story of the friars, the thrilling tale of the pioneers, the orderly conquest of commerce, coupled with the hopes of an El Dorado where life 1 can expand in this fragrant land of opportunity. G Aubrey Davidson, ca. 1915. ©SDHC #UT: 9112.1. As early as 1909, Davidson, then president of the Chamber of Commerce, had suggested that San Diego hold an exposition in 1915 to celebrate the opening of the Panama Canal. When City Park was selected as the site in 1910, it seemed appropriate to rename the park for Spanish explorer Vasco Nuñez de Balboa, who had discovered the Pacific Ocean and claimed the Iris H. W. Engstrand, professor of history at the University of San Diego, is the author of books and articles on local history including San Diego: California’s Cornerstone; Reflections: A History of the San Diego Gas and Electric Company 1881-1991; Harley Knox; San Diego’s Mayor for the People and “The Origins of Balboa Park: A Prelude to the 1915 Exposition,” Journal of San Diego History, Summer 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Applicable." for Functions, Architectural Classification, Materials, and Areas of Significance, Enter Only Categories and Subcategories from the Instructions
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form Is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name._---'-___--=s'-'-T~ • .:....M::...A=R~Y_"S~EP=_=I=SC=O=_'_'PA:....:..=.L~C:.:..H~U=R=C=H..!.._ ______________ other names/site number___________________________________ _ 2. Location city or town_-=.B=O-=.ST..:...O=..:...,:N:.....J(..::;D-=O:...,:.R.=C=.H.:.=E=ST..:...E=R.=) ________________ _ vicinity state MASSACHUSETTS code MA county SUFFOLK code 025 zip code 02125 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that thi~ nomination o request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of the Panama-California Exposition, 1909-1915 by Richard W
    The Journal of San Diego History SAN DIEGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY QUARTERLY Winter 1990, Volume 36, Number 1 Thomas L. Scharf, Editor The Making of the Panama-California Exposition, 1909-1915 by Richard W. Amero Researcher and Writer on the history of Balboa Park Images from this article On July 9, 1901, G. Aubrey Davidson, founder of the Southern Trust and Commerce Bank and Commerce Bank and president of the San Diego Chamber of Commerce, said San Diego should stage an exposition in 1915 to celebrate the completion of the Panama Canal. He told his fellow Chamber of Commerce members that San Diego would be the first American port of call north of the Panama Canal on the Pacific Coast. An exposition would call attention to the city and bolster an economy still shaky from the Wall Street panic of 1907. The Chamber of Commerce authorized Davidson to appoint a committee to look into his idea.1 Because the idea began with him, Davidson is called "the father of the exposition."2 On September 3, 1909, a special Chamber of Commerce committee formed the Panama- California Exposition Company and sent articles of incorporation to the Secretary of State in Sacramento.3 In 1910 San Diego had a population of 39,578, San Diego County 61,665, Los Angeles 319,198 and San Francisco 416,912. San Diego's meager population, the smallest of any city ever to attempt holding an international exposition, testifies to the city's extraordinary pluck and vitality.4 The Board of Directors of the Panama-California Exposition Company, on September 10, 1909, elected Ulysses S.
    [Show full text]
  • CHURCH of ST. VINCENT FERRER, 869 Lexington Avenue, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission February 28, 1967, Number 4 LP-0416 CHURCH OF ST. VINCENT FERRER, 869 Lexington Avenue, Borough of Manhattan. Completed 1918; architect Bertram G. Goodhue. Landnark"Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1400, Lot 20 in part, consisting of the land on which the described building is situated. On November 10, 1966 the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Church of st. Vincent Ferrer and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site. (Item No. 35). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. One witness spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Impressively monumental in scale, this outstanding architectural achievement was considered by Bertram Goodhue, the architect, to be his best work in the ecclesiastical field. st. Vincent Ferrer is designed on a Latin Cross plan in the Gothic Style and built of random ashlar and dressed limestone. Its architectural detail and sculpture, particularly the Crucifixion panel over the entrance portal by sculptor Lee Lawrie, are equal to comparable work found on European cathedrals. The Great Rose window at the west end of the nave is composed of intricate stone tracery, a series of conjoined trefoils. It displays some of the most beautiful stained glass· in this country. Above the great arch of the rose window connecting the two octagonal towers which rise above the massive buttresses flanking the entrance portal, the Apostle Arcade,bere called the Great Galler~ is a handsome crowning feature.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHIVES F. Shirley Prouty Johannes Kirchmayer Research
    ARCHIVES F. Shirley Prouty Johannes Kirchmayer Research Collection 1873-2015 8.5 linear ft. Acquisition Number: 2018-04 Acquisition: Gift of Florence Shirley Prouty. Access: Access to the collection is unrestricted. Copyright: Copyright to this collection is held by the Cranbrook Educational Community. Photographs: Retained with the collection. Negatives removed to cold storage. Audio/Video: Retained with the collection. Processing: Laura MacNewman, April 2019 HISTORY Shirley Prouty is the great great-niece of the woodcarver, Johannes (John) Kirchmayer. Having promised her grandmother that she would write a book about her great great- uncle, she spent many years researching his life, family history, and artworks. Upon reviewing the news clippings that her grandmother had collected, she realized that the scope of the project would be broad. Her research really started in 1994 when her son visited Detroit and was directed to the Cranbrook Educational Community by the Detroit Institute of Arts. Kirchmayer’s artworks are predominantly ecclesiastical wood carvings, though he also worked with stone and ivory. His work can be seen in many churches and cathedrals in the United States, with some further afield. Prouty’s research is published in her book, Johannes Kirchmayer, 1860-1930: master carver from Germany’s passion play village to America’s finest sanctuaries, which includes a biography of Kirchmayer and a detailed catalog of his work. Johannes Baptist Kirchmayr was born in Oberammergau, Bavaria (now Germany), on March 31, 1860, to John Ev. Lang and Theresia Kirchmayr. Born out of wedlock, Lang acknowledged Johannes as his son, though he grew up in the household of his grandfather and thus assumed the Kirchmayr name.
    [Show full text]
  • Connick Windows Fall 2013 the Charles J
    Connick Windows Fall 2013 The Charles J. Connick Stained Glass Foundation, Ltd., Orin E. Skinner, Founder Marilyn B. Justice, President Directors and Officers: Theresa D. Cederholm Judith G. Edington Jeremy J.H. Grubman Charles S. Hayes Elizabeth Ann Justice David A. Martland Albert M. Tannler Ann Baird Whiteside Peter D. Cormack Jonathan L. Fairbanks Elizabeth B. Johnson (honorary) Jolene M. de Verges Kimberly M. Tenney (ex officio) Piety, Patronage and Peinture à Vitrail Milda B. Richardson St. John the Evangelist Monastery in Cambridge, Massachusetts, is the first monastery and Mother House of the American Congregation of the Society of St. John the Evangelist, the first religious order to be founded in the United States by clergy and laymen of the Episcopal Church.1 Isabella Stewart Gardner’s (1840-1927) relationship with the Cowley Fathers is a storied one. Half of the initial parcel of land on Memorial Drive in Cambridge for the monastery of St. John the Evangelist had been funded by Rev. Spence Burton’s parents, Mr. and Mrs. Caspar Henry Burton of Cincinnati, Ohio, with a gift of $25,000 and the option to buy additional land. In 1919 Mrs. Gardner donated another $25,000, thus enabling the Cowley Fathers to buy the second parcel. The Romanesque Revival monastery with its cloister and granite chapel, designed by Ralph Adams Cram (1863-1942), was built between 1924 and completion in 1938.2 Photo courtesy of SSJE.org In a letter of gratitude to Mrs. Gardner, Rev. Burton wrote, “We pray that many generations of devoted Religious will venerate your memory as a foundress of their monastery….”3 Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the California Building and the San Diego Museum Of
    CHAPTER 9 THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING: A CASE OF THE MISUNDERSTOOD BAROQUE AND THE HISTORY OF THE SAN DIEGO MUSEUM/ MUSEUM OF MAN by Richard W. Amero “My judgment is now clear and unfettered, and that dark cloud of ignorance has disappeared, which the continual reading of these detestable books of knight-errantry has cast over my understanding.” Miguel de Cervantes. Don Quixote, Book 2, Part 16. Very few people appear to have looked at the south facade of the California Building in San Diego's Balboa Park. H. K. Raymenton described it as Plateresque in style.[1] Trent Sanford thought it better than anything in Mexico or Spain.[2] William Templeton Johnson called it the finest Spanish- Renaissance facade in existence,[3] and Thomas E. Tallmadge hailed it as the best example of Churrigueresque architecture in the world.[4] An article in the San Diego Union, January 1, 1915, asserted the California Building was "copied in many essential details from the magnificent cathedral at Oaxaca, Mexico."[5] Christian Brinton repeated this suggestion in June of the same year.[6] After checking with Bertram Goodhue, who designed the California Building, C. Matlack Price referred to the comparison as "palpably absurd."[7] The Late-Renaissance Cathedral of Oaxaca, rebuilt in the early eighteenth century, has a compartmentalized facade with three horizontal tiers and five vertical bays which hold one principal and two lateral doorways, and is flanked by two squat, single-stage towers.[8] None of its details resemble those on the California Building. Carol Mendel declared the California Building facade was taken from the seventeenth to nineteenth-century late-Renaissance, Baroque, Neo- Classical facade of the Cathedral of Mexico in Mexico City.[9] If she had selected the mid-eighteenth century Sagrario Metropolitano, which adjoins the cathedral, she would have been closer to the truth, for this building's facade is an outstanding example of Mexican Ultra-Baroque, or, as it is generally known, Churrigueresque.[10] To George H.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\Asd3.GSAPP\Documents
    SOUTH CHURCH/ PARK AVENUE CHRISTIAN CHURCH A History and Analysis of the Church Complex Andrew S. Dolkart 2013 SOUTH CHURCH/ PARK AVENUE CHRISTIAN CHURCH A History and Analysis of the Church Complex Report prepared by Andrew S. Dolkart Report prepared for 1000 Park Avenue 2013 The South Church complex, now the Park Avenue Christian Church complex, designed and built in 1909-11 by the South Dutch Reformed Church, is one of the most significant buildings on Park Avenue dating from the period of major development along that premier New York City boulevard. It is also a major example of Neo-Gothic church architecture and a significant design by Bertram Goodhue, the New York City partner in the firm of Cram, Goodhue & Ferguson, one of the preeminent American designers of the early twentieth century. The South Reformed Church complex consists of the impressive Gothic-inspired church on the southwest corner of Park Avenue and East 85th Street, and the adjoining parish house (sometimes referred to as the parsonage). The church building remains almost exactly as designed by Goodhue, while the parish house was partially altered in a surprisingly sensitive manner in 1962. Together, the church and parish house create an important unified architectural ensemble on the corner of Park Avenue and East 85th Street. They share a Gothic-inspired architectural vocabulary and both are faced with locally-quarried Manhattan schist with Indiana limestone trim. In scale and design, the two related structures play off of one another providing an important, low-scale visual anchor to this section of Park Avenue. The significance of the South Church was widely recognized at the time of its design and at the time of its completion.
    [Show full text]
  • “Our Anglo-Saxon Blood”
    “ Our Anglo-Saxon Blood”: How Belief in Anglo-Saxon Racial Supremacy Connected Men at the University of the South Architecturally and Ideologically to the Larger Nation from 1886-1912 Taylor Jetmundsen Dr. Woody Register History 440 April 26, 2016 2 Introduction In August 1890, the Board of Trustees for the University of the South in Sewanee, Tennessee met for their annual deliberations. When the Board left Sewanee several days later, they had accepted both the resignation of the Vice-Chancellor, the Rev. Telfair Hodgson, and the first long term architectural plan for the University since before the Civil War. The events were entirely related. A young trustee and architect named Silas McBee came to the meetings bearing a new plan for the university: a grand quadrangle built in the latest collegiate architectural style. This style, collegiate Gothic, was only four years old and existed entirely in the North. Silas McBee wanted to bring it South to his alma mater. After McBee and his partner, A.M.Mc. Nixon, an architect from Atlanta, Georgia, presented their plan, a debate broke out over more than just what The University of the South should look like, but what vision the leaders of the small university should follow. A small group led by George R. Fairbanks from Florida saw the new plans as a betrayal of the founder’s vision for a university with colleges for every discipline covering their land on the Cumberland Plateau. The rest saw the $20,000 and beautiful plan that Silas McBee had brought with him, and sided with the new plan.
    [Show full text]