DOCSLIB.ORG

Gradients in the Brain: the Control of the Development of Form and Function in the Cerebral Cortex

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gradients in the Brain: the Control of the Development of Form and Function in the Cerebral Cortex Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Gradients in the Brain: The Control of the Development of Form and Function in the Cerebral Cortex Stephen N. Sansom and Frederick J. Livesey Gurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QN Correspondence: [email protected] In the developing brain, gradients are commonly used to divide neurogenic regions into distinct functional domains. In this article, we discuss the functions of morphogen and gene expression gradients in the assembly of the nervous system in the context of the devel- opment of the cerebral cortex. The cerebral cortex is a mammal-specific region of the forebrain that functions at the top of the neural hierarchy to process and interpret sensory information, plan and organize tasks, and to control motor functions. The mature cerebral cortex is a modular structure, consisting of anatomically and functionally distinct areas. Those areas of neurons are generated from a uniform neuroepithelial sheet by two forms of gradients: graded extracellular signals and a set of transcription factor gradients operating across the field of neocortical stem cells. Fgf signaling from the rostral pole of the cerebral cortex sets up gradients of expression of transcription factors by both activating and repressing gene expression. However, in contrast to the spinal cord and the early Drosophila embryo, these gradients are not subsequently resolved into molecularly distinct domains of gene expression. Instead, graded information in stem cells is translated into dis- crete, region-specific gene expression in the postmitotic neuronal progeny of the stem cells. n the developing brain, gradients are com- the functions of morphogen and gene Imonly used to divide neurogenic regions expression gradients in the assembly of the into distinct functional domains. Examples of nervous system in the context of the develop- such gradients are the sonic hedgehog (Shh) ment of the cerebral cortex. The neocortex is gradient responsible for specifying dorsoventral the mammal-specific region of the forebrain fates in the spinal cord (Ericson et al. 1997), and that functions at the top of the neural hierarchy the double inverted gradients of the transcrip- to process and interpret sensory information, tion factors En1/2 and Pax2/5, induced by plan and organize tasks, and to control motor morphogens secreted from the isthmic organ- functions. A key aspect of the functional izer that pattern the midbrain and hindbrain anatomy of the cerebral cortex is that it is a (Sato et al. 2004). In this article, we discuss modular structure and, as is discussed, those Editors: James Briscoe, Peter Lawrence, and Jean-Paul Vincent Additional Perspectives on Generation and Interpretation of Morphogen Gradients available at www.cshperspectives.org Copyright # 2009 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002519 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2009;1:a002519 1 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press S.N. Sansom and F.J. Livesey modules of neurons are generated from a neu- and gene expression. In the first accurate roepithelial sheet by two forms of gradients: histological analysis, Brodmann divided the graded extracellular signals and a set of tran- human neocortex into areas based on serial sec- scription factor gradients operating across the tioning to produce a map of cortical areas field of neocortical stem cells. (Brodmann 2006). Brodmann’s maps have been largely confirmed by subsequent investi- gations, including studies involving electro- THE NEOCORTEX: A SIX-LAYERED SHEET physical perturbation in live subjects and OF NEURONS DIVIDED INTO neurosurgical procedures on conscious patients FUNCTIONAL AREAS under local anesthesia (Mountcastle 1998). The In humans, the neocortex accounts for nearly functional importance of neocortical areas is three-quarters of the brain volume and also known from the examination of subjects contains more than twenty billion neurons that have suffered loss or damage to particular (Mountcastle 1998). The neocortex is com- areas—for example, damage to Broca’s or posed of six layers of neurons, and those layers Wernicke’s areas in the left hemisphere result differ markedly in neuronal cell type com- in an inability to process language and generate position, cell density, and connectivity. The speech. neurons of the neocortex are characteristically In all species, the neocortex contains three arrayed into vertical groups that span the corti- major areas along the rostrocaudal axis cal layers. In humans, neocortical columns are (Fig. 1B): the rostral motor cortex, the medial approximately 2 mm tall, have a diameter of somatosensory cortex, and the caudal visual 0.5 mm, and contain approximately 60,000 cortex; although the relative sizes of those neurons (Rakic 2008). Neurons within col- areas differs markedly in different species. umns are highly interconnected and share a Although the broad organization of neocortical common function. At a finer scale, neocortical areas shows remarkable similarity in different columns can be subdivided into mini or micro- mammals, the evolution of the neocortex is columns, which contain tens to hundreds of marked by a dramatic increase in cortical neurons, and have been proposed to comprise volume and in the total number of cortical the basic unit of the neocortex (Mountcastle areas. The neocortex of a mammal such as the 1998; Jones 2000; Rakic 2008). At the simplest shrew has a surface area a thousand-fold level of description, the deepest layers of cortical smaller than that of a human and has 10-fold neurons (layers 5 and 6) contain projection fewer functional areas (Striedter 2005). Under- neurons that connect areas of the cortex to standing the mechanisms that pattern the neo- one another or to subcortical structures. Layer cortex into the adult areas represents a major 4 is the layer within which most extracortical challenge and focus of modern developmental inputs arrive, particularly from the sensory neurobiology. thalamus, whereas the superficial layers are composed mainly of local circuits that form DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEOCORTEX— reciprocal connections with the deep layers THE RADIAL UNIT HYPOTHESIS (Fig. 1A) (Thomson and Lamy 2007). Groups of neocortical columns are orga- In mice, a model organism commonly used for nized into functionally distinct neocortical research in this area, development of the neo- areas, such that the cortex is a patchwork of cortex begins at embryonic day 9.5 (E9.5) with functional modules, including areas for motor the appearance of the cerebral vesicles from control, vision, and hearing (Fig. 1B). With the dorsal surface of the rostral neural tube. some notable exceptions, neocortical areas Initially, the neocortical primordium is com- lack obvious anatomical boundaries, being prised of an apparently homogenous pool distinguishable only by differences in cyto- of neural stem cells. The first postmitotic architecture, chemoarchitecture, connectivity, neurons of the neocortex, the Cajal-Retzius 2 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2009;1:a002519 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Gradients in the Brain AB 2/3 Olfactory bulb Rostral 4 Motor area lll Neocortical Motor area ll layers Motor area l 5 Precentral cortex, putative motor area Somatosensory area l 6 Somatosensory area ll Associative area Auditory area Retrospenial cortex Visual area ll Extracortical Visual area l Temporal cortex area ll Area 29d Caudal Figure 1. The arrangement of neocortical circuits and areas in the adult mouse brain. (A) The basic cortical circuit. Major extracortical inputs terminate in layer 4 and to a lesser degree in layer 6. Layer 4 neurons project to layers 2 and 3, which in turn innervate layers 5 and 6, the major output layers of the cortex. (B) Dorsal view of the adult mouse brain, with the functional roles of histologically defined areas labeled. Area maps redrawn from Wree et al. 1983. cells, appear at E10.5 to form a transient struc- visualize clones of neurons in the developing ture known as the marginal zone that later neocortex, failed to provide support for this becomes layer 1. The subsequent generation of model, instead finding evidence for both hori- the glutamatergic projection neurons of layers zontal and radial clones of cells (Price and 2–6 by neocortical stem cells takes place from Thurlow 1988; Walsh and Cepko 1992; Walsh E11 until approximately E17, with neurons of and Cepko 1993). However, after some debate, deep layers (layer 6) produced before those of subsequent studies of the subcortical origins the outer layers (2/3) (Fig. 2A). Postmitotic of inhibitory interneurons of the cortex and layer neurons born in the VZ migrate radially further lineage analyses confirmed the accuracy outwards to form the cortical layers that of the radial unit hypothesis (Tan and Breen together comprise the cortical plate. The out- 1993; Soriano et al. 1995; Anderson et al. wards migration of neurons of layers VI to II 1997). These studies revealed that the gluta- takes place along the processes of radial glial mergic neuronal progeny of neocortical stem cells that span the width of the developing neo- cells form radial columns that span the cortical cortex (Fig. 2B). Neurons of layer 6 are first to plate (Tan and Breen 1993; Soriano et al. leave the ventricular zone and migrate radially 1995) (Fig 2C). By contrast, the horizontal to form the nascent cortical plate. Neurons of clones observed in the initial retroviral studies layer V to II then migrate past those of layer were found to represent the tangential dis- VI and adopt successively superficial positions persion of inwardly migrating inhibitory (Fig. 2A). GABAergic interneurons arriving from the The radial migration of the neuronal ganglionic eminences of the ventral forebrain progeny of neocortical stem cells suggested (O’Rourke et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fgf17b and FGF18 Have Different Midbrain Regulatory Properties from Fgf8b Or Activated FGF Receptors Aimin Liu1,2, James Y
    Research article 6175 FGF17b and FGF18 have different midbrain regulatory properties from FGF8b or activated FGF receptors Aimin Liu1,2, James Y. H. Li2, Carrie Bromleigh2, Zhimin Lao2, Lee A. Niswander1 and Alexandra L. Joyner2,* 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Developmental Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, Departments of Cell Biology, and Physiology and Neuroscience, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 28 August 2003 Development 130, 6175-6185 Published by The Company of Biologists 2003 doi:10.1242/dev.00845 Summary Early patterning of the vertebrate midbrain and region in the midbrain, correlating with cerebellum cerebellum is regulated by a mid/hindbrain organizer that development. By contrast, FGF17b and FGF18 mimic produces three fibroblast growth factors (FGF8, FGF17 FGF8a by causing expansion of the midbrain and and FGF18). The mechanism by which each FGF upregulating midbrain gene expression. This result is contributes to patterning the midbrain, and induces a consistent with Fgf17 and Fgf18 being expressed in the cerebellum in rhombomere 1 (r1) is not clear. We and midbrain and not just in r1 as Fgf8 is. Third, analysis of others have found that FGF8b can transform the midbrain gene expression in mouse brain explants with beads soaked into a cerebellum fate, whereas FGF8a can promote in FGF8b or FGF17b showed that the distinct activities of midbrain development. In this study we used a chick FGF17b and FGF8b are not due to differences in the electroporation assay and in vitro mouse brain explant amount of FGF17b protein produced in vivo.
    [Show full text]
  • Fgf8 Is Mutated in Zebrafish Acerebellar
    Development 125, 2381-2395 (1998) 2381 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1998 DEV1265 Fgf8 is mutated in zebrafish acerebellar (ace) mutants and is required for maintenance of midbrain-hindbrain boundary development and somitogenesis Frank Reifers1, Heike Böhli1, Emily C. Walsh2, Phillip H. Crossley2, Didier Y. R. Stainier2 and Michael Brand1,* 1Department of Neurobiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 364, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany 2Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0554, USA *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 2 April; published on WWW 3 June 1998 SUMMARY We describe the isolation of zebrafish Fgf8 and its gastrulation, and that Fgf8 functions later during expression during gastrulation, somitogenesis, fin bud and somitogenesis to polarize the midbrain. Fgf8 is also early brain development. By demonstrating genetic linkage expressed in a dorsoventral gradient during gastrulation and by analysing the structure of the Fgf8 gene, we show and ectopically expressed Fgf8 can dorsalize embryos. that acerebellar is a zebrafish Fgf8 mutation that may Nevertheless, acerebellar mutants show only mild inactivate Fgf8 function. Homozygous acerebellar embryos dorsoventral patterning defects. Also, in spite of the lack a cerebellum and the midbrain-hindbrain boundary prominent role suggested for Fgf8 in limb development, the organizer. Fgf8 function is required to maintain, but not pectoral fins are largely unaffected in the mutants. Fgf8 is initiate, expression of Pax2.1 and other marker genes in this therefore required in development of several important area. We show that Fgf8 and Pax2.1 are activated in signaling centers in the zebrafish embryo, but may be adjacent domains that only later become overlapping, and redundant or dispensable for others.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Fgfs Have Distinct Roles in Regulating Neurogenesis After Spinal Cord Injury in Zebrafish Yona Goldshmit1,2, Jean Kitty K
    Goldshmit et al. Neural Development (2018) 13:24 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13064-018-0122-9 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Different Fgfs have distinct roles in regulating neurogenesis after spinal cord injury in zebrafish Yona Goldshmit1,2, Jean Kitty K. Y. Tang1, Ashley L. Siegel1, Phong D. Nguyen1, Jan Kaslin1, Peter D. Currie1 and Patricia R. Jusuf1,3* Abstract Background: Despite conserved developmental processes and organization of the vertebrate central nervous system, only some vertebrates including zebrafish can efficiently regenerate neural damage including after spinal cord injury. The mammalian spinal cord shows very limited regeneration and neurogenesis, resulting in permanent life-long functional impairment. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify the cellular and molecular mechanisms that can drive efficient vertebrate neurogenesis following injury. A key pathway implicated in zebrafish neurogenesis is fibroblast growth factor signaling. Methods: In the present study we investigated the roles of distinctfibroblastgrowthfactormembersandtheir receptors in facilitating different aspects of neural development and regeneration at different timepoints following spinal cord injury. After spinal cord injury in adults and during larval development, loss and/or gain of Fgf signaling was combined with immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization and transgenes marking motor neuron populations in in vivo zebrafish and in vitro mammalian PC12 cell culture models. Results: Fgf3 drives neurogenesis of Islet1 expressing motor neuron subtypes and mediate axonogenesis in cMet expressing motor neuron subtypes. We also demonstrate that the role of Fgf members are not necessarily simple recapitulating development. During development Fgf2, Fgf3 and Fgf8 mediate neurogenesis of Islet1 expressing neurons and neuronal sprouting of both, Islet1 and cMet expressing motor neurons.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuregulin 1–Erbb2 Signaling Is Required for the Establishment of Radial Glia and Their Transformation Into Astrocytes in Cerebral Cortex
    Neuregulin 1–erbB2 signaling is required for the establishment of radial glia and their transformation into astrocytes in cerebral cortex Ralf S. Schmid*, Barbara McGrath*, Bridget E. Berechid†, Becky Boyles*, Mark Marchionni‡, Nenad Sˇ estan†, and Eva S. Anton*§ *University of North Carolina Neuroscience Center and Department of Cell and Molecular Physiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; †Department of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510; and ‡CeNes Pharamceuticals, Inc., Norwood, MA 02062 Communicated by Pasko Rakic, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, January 27, 2003 (received for review December 12, 2002) Radial glial cells and astrocytes function to support the construction mine whether NRG-1-mediated signaling is involved in radial and maintenance, respectively, of the cerebral cortex. However, the glial cell development and differentiation in the cerebral cortex. mechanisms that determine how radial glial cells are established, We show that NRG-1 signaling, involving erbB2, may act in maintained, and transformed into astrocytes in the cerebral cortex are concert with Notch signaling to exert a critical influence in the not well understood. Here, we show that neuregulin-1 (NRG-1) exerts establishment, maintenance, and appropriate transformation of a critical role in the establishment of radial glial cells. Radial glial cell radial glial cells in cerebral cortex. generation is significantly impaired in NRG mutants, and this defect can be rescued by exogenous NRG-1. Down-regulation of expression Materials and Methods and activity of erbB2, a member of the NRG-1 receptor complex, leads Clonal Analysis to Study NRG’s Role in the Initial Establishment of to the transformation of radial glial cells into astrocytes.
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE S1 Complete Overview of Protocols for Induction of Pscs Into
    TABLE S1 Complete overview of protocols for induction of PSCs into renal lineages Ref 2D/ Cell type Protocol Days Growth factors Outcome Other analyses # 3D hiPSC, hESC, Collagen type I tx murine epidydymal fat pads,ex vivo 54 2D 8 Y27632, AA, CHIR, BMP7 IM miPSC, mESC Matrigel with murine fetal kidney hiPSC, hESC, Suspension,han tx murine epidydymal fat pads,ex vivo 54 2D 20 AA, CHIR, BMP7 IM miPSC, mESC ging drop with murine fetal kidney tx murine epidydymal fat pads,ex vivo 55 hiPSC, hESC Matrigel 2D 14 CHIR, TTNPB/AM580, Y27632 IM with murine fetal kidney Injury, tx murine epidydymal fat 57 hiPSC Suspension 2D 28 AA, CHIR, BMP7, TGF-β1, TTNPB, DMH1 NP pads,spinal cord assay Matrigel,membr 58 mNPC, hESC 3D 7 BPM7, FGF9, Heparin, Y27632, CHIR, LDN, BMP4, IGF1, IGF2 NP Clonal expansion ane filter iMatrix,spinal 59 hiPSC 3D 10 LIF, Y27632, FGF2/FGF9, TGF-α, DAPT, CHIR, BMP7 NP Clonal expansion cord assay iMatrix,spinal 59 murine NP 3D 8-19 LIF, Y27632, FGF2/FGF9, TGF- α, DAPT, CHIR, BMP7 NP Clonal expansion cord assay murine NP, Suspension, 60 3D 7-19 BMP7, FGF2, Heparin, Y27632, LIF NP Nephrotoxicity, injury model human NP membrane filter Suspension, Contractility and permeability assay, ex 61 hiPSC 2D 10 AA, BMP7, RA Pod gelatin vivo with murine fetal kidney Matrigel. 62 hiPSC, hESC fibronectin, 2D < 50 FGF2, AA, WNT3A, BMP4, BMP7, RA, FGF2, HGF or RA + VITD3 Pod collagen type I Matrigel, Contractility and uptake assay,ex vivo 63 hiPSC 2D 13 Y27632, CP21R7, BMP4, RA, BMP7, FGF9, VITD3 Pod collagen type I with murine fetal kidney Collagen
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of Fgfs in the Early Development of Vertebrate Limbs
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW The roles of FGFs in the early development of vertebrate limbs Gail R. Martin1 Department of Anatomy and Program in Developmental Biology, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143–0452 USA ‘‘Fibroblast growth factor’’ (FGF) was first identified 25 tion of two closely related proteins—acidic FGF and ba- years ago as a mitogenic activity in pituitary extracts sic FGF (now designated FGF1 and FGF2, respectively). (Armelin 1973; Gospodarowicz 1974). This modest ob- With the advent of gene isolation techniques it became servation subsequently led to the identification of a large apparent that the Fgf1 and Fgf2 genes are members of a family of proteins that affect cell proliferation, differen- large family, now known to be comprised of at least 17 tiation, survival, and motility (for review, see Basilico genes, Fgf1–Fgf17, in mammals (see Coulier et al. 1997; and Moscatelli 1992; Baird 1994). Recently, evidence has McWhirter et al. 1997; Hoshikawa et al. 1998; Miyake been accumulating that specific members of the FGF 1998). At least five of these genes are expressed in the family function as key intercellular signaling molecules developing limb (see Table 1). The proteins encoded by in embryogenesis (for review, see Goldfarb 1996). Indeed, the 17 different FGF genes range from 155 to 268 amino it may be no exaggeration to say that, in conjunction acid residues in length, and each contains a conserved with the members of a small number of other signaling ‘‘core’’ sequence of ∼120 amino acids that confers a com- molecule families [including WNT (Parr and McMahon mon tertiary structure and the ability to bind heparin or 1994), Hedgehog (HH) (Hammerschmidt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Cortical Development and Microcephaly in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Using Combinatorial Pathway Inhibition
    Modeling cortical development and microcephaly in human pluripotent stem cells using combinatorial pathway inhibition Dissertation to obtain the academic degree Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) submitted to the Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy of Freie Universität Berlin by Naresh Mutukula 2019 The research work for this dissertation was performed from July 2014 to May 2019 under the supervision of Dr. Yechiel Elkabetz at the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics in Berlin, Germany. The dissertation was submitted in May 2019 to the Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy of the Freie Universität Berlin, Germany. 1st Reviewer: Dr. Yechiel Elkabetz Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin. 2nd Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Sigmar Stricker Freie Universität Berlin Date of disputation: 18th Nov, 2019 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my deep gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Yechiel Elkabetz for giving me the opportunity to work in his lab and introducing me to the very exciting world of pluripotent and neural stem cell biology research. I am very grateful to him for his excellent supervision, constant support and immense patience he has shown in both good and bad times during all these years of my PhD. I would like to thank him for all the teachings and discussions including non- academics during the last few years. Secondly, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Sigmar Stricker for accepting to be the second reviewer of my PhD dissertation. I am very thankful to my good friend Rotem Volkman from Tel Aviv University, who was there for me during the initial phase of my PhD.
    [Show full text]
  • Seifert Et Al Fgf8 Dev2009.Pdf
    RESEARCH ARTICLE 2643 Development 136, 2643-2651 (2009) doi:10.1242/dev.036830 Functional and phylogenetic analysis shows that Fgf8 is a marker of genital induction in mammals but is not required for external genital development Ashley W. Seifert1, Terry Yamaguchi2 and Martin J. Cohn1,3,* In mammalian embryos, male and female external genitalia develop from the genital tubercle. Outgrowth of the genital tubercle is maintained by the urethral epithelium, and it has been reported that Fgf8 mediates this activity. To test directly whether Fgf8 is required for external genital development, we conditionally removed Fgf8 from the cloacal/urethral epithelium. Surprisingly, Fgf8 is not necessary for initiation, outgrowth or normal patterning of the external genitalia. In early genital tubercles, we found no redundant Fgf expression in the urethral epithelium, which contrasts with the situation in the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) of the limb. Analysis of Fgf8 pathway activity showed that four putative targets are either absent from early genital tubercles or are not regulated by Fgf8. We therefore examined the distribution of Fgf8 protein and report that, although it is present in the AER, Fgf8 is undetectable in the genital tubercle. Thus, Fgf8 is transcribed, but the signaling pathway is not activated during normal genital development. A phylogenetic survey of amniotes revealed Fgf8 expression in genital tubercles of eutherian and metatherian mammals, but not turtles or alligators, indicating that Fgf8 expression is neither a required nor a conserved feature of amniote external genital development. The results indicate that Fgf8 expression is an early readout of the genital initiation signal rather than the signal itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterogeneity in Ventricular Zone Neural Precursors Contributes to Neuronal Fate Diversity in the Postnatal Neocortex
    7028 • The Journal of Neuroscience, May 19, 2010 • 30(20):7028–7036 Development/Plasticity/Repair Heterogeneity in Ventricular Zone Neural Precursors Contributes to Neuronal Fate Diversity in the Postnatal Neocortex Elizabeth K. Stancik,1 Ivan Navarro-Quiroga,1 Robert Sellke,2 and Tarik F. Haydar1 1Center for Neuroscience Research, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010, and 2University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 The recent discovery of short neural precursors (SNPs) in the murine neocortical ventricular zone (VZ) challenges the widely held view that radial glial cells (RGCs) are the sole occupants of this germinal compartment and suggests that precursor variety is an important factor of brain development. Here, we use in utero electroporation and genetic fate mapping to show that SNPs and RGCs cohabit the VZ but display different cell cycle kinetics and generate phenotypically different progeny. In addition, we find that RGC progeny undergo additional rounds of cell division as intermediate progenitor cells (IPCs), whereas SNP progeny generally produce postmitotic neurons directly from the VZ. By clearly defining SNPs as bona fide VZ residents, separate from both RGCs and IPCs, and uncovering their unique proliferativeandlineageproperties,theseresultsdemonstratehowindividualneuralprecursorgroupsintheembryonicrodentVZcreate diversity in the overlying neocortex. Introduction progenitors properly form the cerebral cortex as well as for elu- The ventricular zone (VZ) of the dorsal telencephalon contains cidating possible mechanisms of species-specific diversity. the progenitor cells that produce all of the various excitatory In addition to the neural precursors in the VZ, a separate class neurons of the mature neocortex. This process occurs during of neuronal progenitors has been described in the overlying sub- prenatal mammalian brain development through a precisely reg- ventricular zone (SVZ).
    [Show full text]
  • Fgf8 Induces Heart Development 227
    Development 127, 225-235 (2000) 225 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 2000 DEV1488 Induction and differentiation of the zebrafish heart requires fibroblast growth factor 8 (fgf8/acerebellar) Frank Reifers1, Emily C. Walsh2, Sophie Léger1, Didier Y. R. Stainier2 and Michael Brand1,* 1Department of Neurobiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 364, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany 2Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0554, USA *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 1 November; published on WWW 20 December 1999 SUMMARY Vertebrate heart development is initiated from bilateral heart ventricle. Fgf8 is required for the earliest stages of lateral plate mesoderm that expresses the Nkx2.5 and nkx2.5 and gata4, but not gata6, expression in cardiac GATA4 transcription factors, but the extracellular signals precursors. Cardiac gene expression is restored in specifying heart precursor gene expression are not known. acerebellar mutant embryos by injecting fgf8 RNA, or by We describe here that the secreted signaling factor Fgf8 is implanting a Fgf8-coated bead into the heart primordium. expressed in and required for development of the zebrafish Pharmacological inhibition of Fgf signalling during heart precursors, particularly during initiation of cardiac formation of the heart primordium phenocopies the gene expression. fgf8 is mutated in acerebellar (ace) acerebellar heart phenotype, confirming that Fgf signaling mutants, and homozygous mutant embryos do not establish is required independently of earlier functions during normal circulation, although vessel formation is only gastrulation. These findings show that fgf8/acerebellar is mildly affected. In contrast, heart development, in required for induction and patterning of myocardial particular of the ventricle, is severely abnormal in precursors.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Field Pattern Is Intrinsic to the Embryonic Mouse Hippocampus Early in Neurogenesis
    The Journal of Neuroscience, March 1, 2001, 21(5):1580–1589 Detailed Field Pattern Is Intrinsic to the Embryonic Mouse Hippocampus Early in Neurogenesis Shubha Tole and Elizabeth A. Grove Department of Neurobiology, Pharmacology and Physiology, Committees on Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 There is accumulating evidence that the mammalian cerebral ble sources of patterning signals intrinsic to the explants were cortex is regionally specified early in neurogenesis. However, evaluated by removing the cortical hem or presumptive extra- the degree and scale of the regional pattern that is intrinsic to hippocampal cortex from the explants. To expose cells to dif- different parts of the cortical primordium remains unclear. Here, ferent local positional cues, explant fragments were grafted into we show that detailed patterning—the accurate positioning of ectopic positions in a larger explant. None of these manipula- several areas or fields—is intrinsic to the part of the primordium tions altered the development of patterned, field-specific gene that generates the hippocampus. A caudomedial portion of the expression. Finally, explants harvested at E10.5 also upregulate cortical primordium, the site from which the hippocampus field-specific gene expression, although less robustly. Some arises, was isolated from potential extrinsic patterning cues by hippocampal patterning information is therefore intrinsic to the maintaining it in explant culture. Explants were prepared at caudomedial cortical primordium at the time that the first hip- embryonic day (E) 12.5, which is early in hippocampal neuro- pocampal neurons are born at E10.5. By E12.5, hippocampal genesis in the mouse and 3 d before individual fields are seen field patterning appears to be well established and resistant to by differential gene expression.
    [Show full text]
  • From Genes to Folds: a Review of Cortical Gyrification Theory
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Brain Struct Funct (2015) 220:2475–2483 DOI 10.1007/s00429-014-0961-z REVIEW From genes to folds: a review of cortical gyrification theory Lisa Ronan • Paul C. Fletcher Received: 5 September 2014 / Accepted: 6 December 2014 / Published online: 16 December 2014 Ó The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Cortical gyrification is not a random process. Introduction: key characteristics of gyrification Instead, the folds that develop are synonymous with the functional organization of the cortex, and form patterns A wing would be a most mystifying structure if one that are remarkably consistent across individuals and even did not know that birds flew. One might observe that some species. How this happens is not well understood. it could be extended a considerable distance that it Although many developmental features and evolutionary had a smooth covering of feathers with conspicuous adaptations have been proposed as the primary cause of markings, that it was operated by powerful muscles, gyrencephaly, it is not evident that gyrification is reducible and that strength and lightness were prominent fea- in this way. In recent years, we have greatly increased our tures of its construction. These are important facts, understanding of the multiple factors that influence cortical but by themselves they do not tell us that birds fly. folding, from the action of genes in health and disease to Yet without knowing this, and without understanding evolutionary adaptations that characterize distinctions something of the principles of flight, a more detailed between gyrencephalic and lissencephalic cortices.
    [Show full text]