Probing Ghz Gravitational Waves with Graviton–Magnon Resonance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Probing Ghz Gravitational Waves with Graviton–Magnon Resonance Eur. Phys. J. C (2020) 80:179 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7735-y Letter Probing GHz gravitational waves with graviton–magnon resonance Asuka Itoa, Tomonori Ikedab, Kentaro Miuchic, Jiro Sodad Department of Physics, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan Received: 30 November 2019 / Accepted: 9 February 2020 / Published online: 27 February 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract A novel method for extending the frequency length of gravitational waves exceeds the current Hubble frontier in gravitational wave observations is proposed. It horizon. Measuring the temperature anisotropy and the B- is shown that gravitational waves can excite a magnon. mode polarization of the cosmic microwave background Thus, gravitational waves can be probed by a graviton– [3,4], we can probe gravitational waves with frequencies magnon detector which measures resonance fluorescence of between 10−18 and 10−16 Hz. Astrometry of extragalactic magnons. Searching for gravitational waves with a wave radio sources is sensitive to gravitational waves with fre- length λ by using a ferromagnetic sample with a dimension quencies between 10−16 and 10−9 Hz [5,6]. The pulsar tim- l, the sensitivity of the graviton–magnon detector reaches ing arrays, like EPTA [7,8], IPTA [9] and NANOGrav [10], −22 l −2 −1/2 spectral densities, around 5.4 × 10 × ( λ/ π ) [Hz ] observe the gravitational waves in the frequency band from 2 − − . × −21 × ( l )−2 [ −1/2] 10 9 Hz to 10 7 Hz. Doppler tracking of a space craft, which at 14 GHz and 8 6 10 λ/2π Hz at 8.2 GHz, respectively. uses a measurement similar to the pulsar timing arrays, can search for gravitational waves in the frequency band from 10−7 to 10−3 Hz [11]. The space interferometers LISA [12] −3 1 Introduction and DECIGO [13] can cover the range between 10 and 10 Hz. The interferometer detectors LIGO [14], Virgo [15], and In 2015, the gravitational wave interferometer detector KAGRA [16] with km size arm lengths can search for gravi- LIGO [1] opened up full-blown multi-messenger astronomy tational waves with frequencies from 10 Hz to 1 kHz. In this and cosmology, where electromagnetic waves, gravitational frequency band, resonant bar experiments [17] are comple- waves, neutrinos, and cosmic rays are utilized to explore the mentary to the interferometers [18]. Furthermore, interfer- universe. In future, as the history of electromagnetic wave ometers can be used to measure gravitational waves with the astronomy tells us, multi-frequency gravitational wave obser- frequencies between 1 kHz and 100 MHz. In fact, recently, vations will be required to boost the multi-messenger astron- the limit on gravitational waves at MHz was reported [19]. omy and cosmology. To the best of our knowledge, the measurement of 100 MHz The purpose of this letter is to present a novel idea for gravitational waves with a 0.75 m arm length interferometer extending the frequency frontier in gravitational wave obser- [20] is the highest frequency gravitational wave experiment vations and to report the first limit on GHz gravitational to date. Thus, the frequency range higher than 100 MHz is waves. As we will see below, there are experimental and remaining to be explored. Given this experimental situation, theoretical motivations to probe GHz gravitational waves. GHz experiments are desired to extend the frequency frontier. It is useful to review the current status of gravitational Theoretically, GHz gravitational waves are interesting wave observations [2]. It should be stressed that there exists from various points of view. As is well known, inflation a lowest measurable frequency. Indeed, the lowest frequency can produce primordial gravitational waves. Among the fea- we can measure is around 10−18 Hz below which the wave tures of primordial gravitational waves, the most clear sig- nature is the break of the spectrum determined by the energy scale of the inflation, which may locate at around GHz a e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) [17]. Moreover, at the end of inflation or just after infla- b e-mail: [email protected] tion, there may be a high frequency peak of gravitational c e-mail: [email protected] waves [21,22]. Remarkably, there is a chance to observe d e-mail: [email protected] 123 179 Page 2 of 5 Eur. Phys. J. C (2020) 80 :179 the non-classical nature of primordial gravitational waves Heisenberg model: with frequency between MHz and GHz [23]. On the other H =−μ ˆz + ˆ j − ˆ · ˆ , hand, there are many astrophysical sources producing high g B Bz 2S(i) hzjS(i) JijS(i) S( j) frequency gravitational waves [24]. Among them, primor- i i, j dial black holes are the most interesting ones because they (3) give a hint of the information loss problem. Exotic signals where an external magnetic field Bz is applied along the z- from extra dimensions may exist in the GHz band [25,26]. direction and i specifies each of the sites of the spins. The Hence, GHz gravitational waves could be a window to the second term represents the interactions between spins with extra dimensions [27]. Thus, it is worth investigating GHz coupling constants Jij. gravitational waves to understand the astrophysical process, Let us consider planar gravitational waves propagating the early universe, and quantum gravity. in the z–x plane, namely, the wave number vector of the In this letter, we propose a novel method for detecting GHz gravitational waves k has a direction kˆ = (sin θ,0, cos θ). gravitational waves with a magnon detector. First, we show Moreover, we assume that the wave length of the gravitational that gravitational waves excite magnons in a ferromagnetic waves is much larger than the dimension of the sample. This insulator. Furthermore, using experimental results of mea- is the case of cavity experiments which we utilize in the next surement of resonance fluorescence of magnons [28,29], we section. We can expand the metric perturbations in terms of demonstrate that the sensitivity to the spectral density of grav- (σ) (σ ) linear polarization tensors satisfying e e = δσσ as . × −22 × ( l )−2 [ −1/2] ij ij itational waves are around 5 4 10 λ/2π Hz . × −21 × ( l )−2 [ −1/2] ( ) = (+)( ) (+) + (×)( ) (×), at 14 GHz and 8 6 10 λ/2π Hz at 8.2 GHz, hij t h t eij h t eij (4) respectively, where l is the dimension of the ferromagnetic where we used the fact that the amplitude is approximately insulator and λ is the wave length of the gravitational waves. uniform over the sample. More explicitly, we took the repre- sentation (+) (+) h − w w 2 Graviton–magnon resonance h (t) = e i h t + ei h t , (5) 2 (×) The Dirac equation in curved spacetime with a metric gμν is (×) h − (w +α) (w +α) h (t) = e i h t + ei h t , (6) given by 2 μ γ αˆ ∂ + + ψ = ψ, where ωh is an angular frequency of the gravitational waves i eαˆ μ μ ieAμ m (1) and α represents a difference of the phases of polarizations. αˆ where γ , e, Aμ are the gamma matrices, the electronic Note that the polarization tensors can be explicitly con- μ charge, and a vector potential, respectively. A tetrad eαˆ sat- structed as ˆ ⎛ ⎞ αˆ β θ 2 − θ θ isfies eμeν ηαˆ βˆ = gμν. The spin connection is defined by cos 0 cos sin (+) 1 ⎝ ⎠ 1 αˆ νβˆ ν λβˆ 1 e = √ 0 −10 , (7) μ = e σ ˆ ∂μe + e , where σ ˆ = [γαˆ ,γˆ] ij 2 ν αˆ β λμ αˆ β 4 β 2 − θ θ θ 2 μ cos sin 0sin is a generator of the Lorentz group and νλ is the Christoffel ⎛ ⎞ 0 cos θ 0 symbol. (×) 1 e = √ ⎝ cos θ 0 − sin θ ⎠ . (8) In the non-relativistic limit, one can obtain interaction ij 2 − θ terms between a magnetic field and a spin: 0 sin 0 In Eqs. (7) and (8), we defined the + mode as a deformation H −μ 2δ + h Sˆi B j , (2) spin B ij ij in the y-direction. ˆ where μB =|e|/2m, S, and B are the Bohr magneton, the It is well known that the spin system (3) can be rewritten spin of the electron, and an external magnetic field, respec- by using the Holstein–Primakoff transformation [32]: 1 ⎧ tively. hij( 1) describes “effective” gravitational waves. ˆz 1 ˆ † ˆ ⎪S( ) = − C Ci , The second term shows that gravitational waves can interact ⎨ i 2 i ˆ+ ˆ † ˆ ˆ with the spin in the presence of external magnetic fields [31]. S( ) = 1 − C Ci Ci , (9) ⎪ i i We now consider a ferromagnetic sample which has N ⎩ ˆ− ˆ † ˆ † ˆ S( ) = C 1 − C Ci , electronic spins. Such a system is well described by the i i i ˆ ˆ † where the bosonic operators Ci and Ci satisfy the commuta- 1 The discussion should be developed in the proper detector frame. [ ˆ , ˆ †]=δ ± = x ± y k l k tion relations Ci C j ij and S( j) S( j) iS( j) are the Then hij is given by the Riemann tensor like Rikjlx x ,wherex is the spatial coordinate of a Fermi normal coordinate [30]. Consequently, a ladder operators. The bosonic operators describe spin waves ( l )2 with dispersion relations determined by B and J . Further- suppression factor λ/2π appears when we read off the “true” gravi- z ij tational wave from hij at the final result. more, provided that contributions from the surface of the 123 Eur.
Recommended publications
  • Gnc 2021 Abstract Book
    GNC 2021 ABSTRACT BOOK Contents GNC Posters ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Poster 01: A Software Defined Radio Galileo and GPS SW receiver for real-time on-board Navigation for space missions ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Poster 02: JUICE Navigation camera design .................................................................................................... 9 Poster 03: PRESENTATION AND PERFORMANCES OF MULTI-CONSTELLATION GNSS ORBITAL NAVIGATION LIBRARY BOLERO ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Poster 05: EROSS Project - GNC architecture design for autonomous robotic On-Orbit Servicing .............. 12 Poster 06: Performance assessment of a multispectral sensor for relative navigation ............................... 14 Poster 07: Validation of Astrix 1090A IMU for interplanetary and landing missions ................................... 16 Poster 08: High Performance Control System Architecture with an Output Regulation Theory-based Controller and Two-Stage Optimal Observer for the Fine Pointing of Large Scientific Satellites ................. 18 Poster 09: Development of High-Precision GPSR Applicable to GEO and GTO-to-GEO Transfer ................. 20 Poster 10: P4COM: ESA Pointing Error Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Virgo: Status of the Detector, Latest Results and Future Prospects
    universe Review Advanced Virgo: Status of the Detector, Latest Results and Future Prospects Diego Bersanetti 1,* , Barbara Patricelli 2,3 , Ornella Juliana Piccinni 4 , Francesco Piergiovanni 5,6 , Francesco Salemi 7,8 and Valeria Sequino 9,10 1 INFN, Sezione di Genova, I-16146 Genova, Italy 2 European Gravitational Observatory (EGO), Cascina, I-56021 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] 3 INFN, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy 4 INFN, Sezione di Roma, I-00185 Roma, Italy; [email protected] 5 Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate, Università di Urbino, I-61029 Urbino, Italy; [email protected] 6 INFN, Sezione di Firenze, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trento, Povo, I-38123 Trento, Italy; [email protected] 8 INFN, TIFPA, Povo, I-38123 Trento, Italy 9 Dipartimento di Fisica “E. Pancini”, Università di Napoli “Federico II”, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] 10 INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Virgo detector, based at the EGO (European Gravitational Observatory) and located in Cascina (Pisa), played a significant role in the development of the gravitational-wave astronomy. From its first scientific run in 2007, the Virgo detector has constantly been upgraded over the years; since 2017, with the Advanced Virgo project, the detector reached a high sensitivity that allowed the detection of several classes of sources and to investigate new physics. This work reports the Citation: Bersanetti, D.; Patricelli, B.; main hardware upgrades of the detector and the main astrophysical results from the latest five years; Piccinni, O.J.; Piergiovanni, F.; future prospects for the Virgo detector are also presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin J. Owen - Curriculum Vitae
    BENJAMIN J. OWEN - CURRICULUM VITAE Contact information Mail: Texas Tech University Department of Physics & Astronomy Lubbock, TX 79409-1051, USA E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +1-806-834-0231 Fax: +1-806-742-1182 Education 1998 Ph.D. in Physics, California Institute of Technology Thesis title: Gravitational waves from compact objects Thesis advisor: Kip S. Thorne 1993 B.S. in Physics, magna cum laude, Sonoma State University (California) Minors: Astronomy, German Research advisors: Lynn R. Cominsky, Gordon G. Spear Academic positions Primary: 2015{ Professor of Physics & Astronomy Texas Tech University 2013{2015 Professor of Physics The Pennsylvania State University 2008{2013 Associate Professor of Physics The Pennsylvania State University 2002{2008 Assistant Professor of Physics The Pennsylvania State University 2000{2002 Research Associate University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 1998{2000 Research Scholar Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Golm) Secondary: 2015{2018 Adjunct Professor The Pennsylvania State University 2012 (2 months) Visiting Scientist Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Hanover) 2010 (6 months) Visiting Associate LIGO Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 2009 (6 months) Visiting Scientist Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Hanover) Honors and awards 2017 Princess of Asturias Award for Technical and Scientific Research (with the LIGO Scientific Collaboration) 2017 Albert Einstein Medal (with the LIGO Scientific Collaboration) 2017 Bruno Rossi Prize for High Energy Astrophysics (with the LIGO Scientific Collaboration) 2017 Royal Astronomical Society Group Achievement Award (with the LIGO Scientific Collab- oration) 2016 Gruber Cosmology Prize (with the LIGO Scientific Collaboration) 2016 Special Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics (with the LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion) 2013 Fellow of the American Physical Society 1998 Milton and Francis Clauser Prize for Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • 121012-AAS-221 Program-14-ALL, Page 253 @ Preflight
    221ST MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY 6-10 January 2013 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA Scientific sessions will be held at the: Long Beach Convention Center 300 E. Ocean Blvd. COUNCIL.......................... 2 Long Beach, CA 90802 AAS Paper Sorters EXHIBITORS..................... 4 Aubra Anthony ATTENDEE Alan Boss SERVICES.......................... 9 Blaise Canzian Joanna Corby SCHEDULE.....................12 Rupert Croft Shantanu Desai SATURDAY.....................28 Rick Fienberg Bernhard Fleck SUNDAY..........................30 Erika Grundstrom Nimish P. Hathi MONDAY........................37 Ann Hornschemeier Suzanne H. Jacoby TUESDAY........................98 Bethany Johns Sebastien Lepine WEDNESDAY.............. 158 Katharina Lodders Kevin Marvel THURSDAY.................. 213 Karen Masters Bryan Miller AUTHOR INDEX ........ 245 Nancy Morrison Judit Ries Michael Rutkowski Allyn Smith Joe Tenn Session Numbering Key 100’s Monday 200’s Tuesday 300’s Wednesday 400’s Thursday Sessions are numbered in the Program Book by day and time. Changes after 27 November 2012 are included only in the online program materials. 1 AAS Officers & Councilors Officers Councilors President (2012-2014) (2009-2012) David J. Helfand Quest Univ. Canada Edward F. Guinan Villanova Univ. [email protected] [email protected] PAST President (2012-2013) Patricia Knezek NOAO/WIYN Observatory Debra Elmegreen Vassar College [email protected] [email protected] Robert Mathieu Univ. of Wisconsin Vice President (2009-2015) [email protected] Paula Szkody University of Washington [email protected] (2011-2014) Bruce Balick Univ. of Washington Vice-President (2010-2013) [email protected] Nicholas B. Suntzeff Texas A&M Univ. suntzeff@aas.org Eileen D. Friel Boston Univ. [email protected] Vice President (2011-2014) Edward B. Churchwell Univ. of Wisconsin Angela Speck Univ. of Missouri [email protected] [email protected] Treasurer (2011-2014) (2012-2015) Hervey (Peter) Stockman STScI Nancy S.
    [Show full text]
  • Massimo Cerdonio, University of Padua
    The gravitational waves network within a global network of observatories Massimo Cerdonio INFN Section & Physics Department, Padova, Italy · ground based gw detectors in the 2010s: efforts in US, Eu, Japan, Brasil (+ Au and Cina) · LISA and beyond · the need for networking gw detectors: sky, frequency and time coverage false alarms and confident detections direction & polarization of incoming gw · violent events in the cosmos involving matter at extreme densities: a gw observatory within an international network for multimessenger searches · imagining gw as one of the astronomies in 2025 (assuming 2010s expectations fulfilled) AURIGA Massimo Cerdonio www.auriga.lnl.infn.it Penn 10/29/04 goals trends needs · optimize performance of gw observatory >>> broaden the geographical distribution of the detectors, upgrade detectors to second (and third) generation, coordinate their on/off · evolve from initial detections to steady observations >>> optimize directed searches: gw an astronomical tool · solicit input from theory >>> accurate waveforms from numerical relativity to enhance SNR · roadmap to second generation detectors LIGO adv-NSF, VIRGO adv-CNRS/INFN, GEO · proposals for additional detectors Europe-EGO/ApPEC/ILIAS, Australia, Cina · seeds for third generation detectors LSC-NSF, EGO-CNRS/INFN/MPG/PPARC · studies on networking GWIC, ILIAS · coordination and collaboration between agencies worldwide to enhance and optimize trends AURIGA Massimo Cerdonio www.auriga.lnl.infn.it Penn 10/29/04 about “the role…” (after all these considerations)
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Gravitational-Wave Detectors Different Frequency
    The Status of Gravitational Wave Detectors The Status of Gravitational-Wave Detectors Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory LIGO-G030249-02-W Different Frequency Bands of Detectors and Sources space terrestrial ● EM waves are studied over ~20 Audio band orders of magnitude » (ULF radio −> HE γ rays) ● Gravitational Wave coverage over ~8 orders of magnitude » (terrestrial + space) LIGO-G030249-02-W LIGO Detector Commissioning 2 Fred Raab, Caltech & LIGO (KITP Gravitation Conference 5/12/03) 1 The Status of Gravitational Wave Detectors Basic Signature of Gravitational Waves for All Detectors LIGO-G030249-02-W LIGO Detector Commissioning 3 Original Terrestrial Detectors Continue to be Improved AURIGA II Resonant Bar Detector 1E-20 AURIGA I run LHe4 vessel Al2081 AURIGA II run Cryo ] 2 / 1 holder - Electronics z 1E-21 H [ 2 / 1 wiring hh support S AURIGA II run UltraCryo 1E-22 Main 850 860 880 900 920 940 950 Frequency [Hz] Attenuator Thermal Sensitive bar Shield •Efforts to broaden frequency range and reduce noise Compression •Size limited by sound speed Spring Transducer Courtesy M. Cerdonnio LIGO-G030249-02-W LIGO Detector Commissioning 4 Fred Raab, Caltech & LIGO (KITP Gravitation Conference 5/12/03) 2 The Status of Gravitational Wave Detectors New Generation of “Free- Mass” Detectors Now Online suspended mirrors mark inertial frames antisymmetric port carries GW signal Symmetric port carries common-mode info Intrinsically broad band and size-limited by speed of light. LIGO-G030249-02-W LIGO Detector
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Waves from Neutron Stars: a Review
    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (PASA), Vol. 32, e034, 11 pages (2015). C Astronomical Society of Australia 2015; published by Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.35 Gravitational Waves from Neutron Stars: A Review Paul D. Lasky Monash Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia Email: [email protected] (Received August 20, 2015; Accepted August 26, 2015) Abstract Neutron stars are excellent emitters of gravitational waves. Squeezing matter beyond nuclear densities invites exotic physical processes, many of which violently transfer large amounts of mass at relativistic velocities, disrupting spacetime and generating copious quantities of gravitational radiation. I review mechanisms for generating gravitational waves with neutron stars. This includes gravitational waves from radio and millisecond pulsars, magnetars, accreting systems, and newly born neutron stars, with mechanisms including magnetic and thermoelastic deformations, various stellar oscillation modes, and core superfluid turbulence. I also focus on what physics can be learnt from a gravitational wave detection, and where additional research is required to fully understand the dominant physical processes at play. Keywords: gravitational waves – stars: neutron 1 INTRODUCTION during inflation. Continuous gravitational waves are almost monochromatic signals generated typically by rotating, non- The dawn of gravitational wave astronomy is one of the most axisymmetric neutron stars. anticipated scientific advances of the coming decade. The The above laundry list of gravitational wave sources second generation, ground-based gravitational wave interfer- prominently features neutron stars in their many guises. ometers, Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave While supranuclear densities, relativistic velocities, and Observatory (aLIGO Aasi et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1902.03905V2 [Astro-Ph.HE] 1 Mar 2019
    Multimessenger Research before GW170817 Giuseppina Modestino∗ INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, I-00044, Frascati (Roma) Italy (Dated: March 4, 2019) Linking the previous research that occurred over the last decades, I will try to provide some objective elements to evaluate the innovation of the joint observation of GW170817 and GRB 170817A and their occurrence detection, in light of preceding experiences regarding the experimental research of association between γ-ray bursts (GRBs) and gravitational waves (GWs). Without debating about the phenomenological properties of astrophysical events, I propose a comparison between that result and the previous experimental research by the interferometer GW community, using a fundamental energy emission law, and including about fifteen years of accredited results regarding coincident detection. From the present review, an intense and old pre-existing activity in the field of multimessenger observations emerges giving a first interesting fact. The widespread opinion that joint detection of GW170817 and GRB 170817A has opened a new method in astrophysics does not find a robust reason. Moreover, some critical points highlight. In the past, applying the same multimessenger method, numerous measures have been taken towards much brighter and much closer sources. Then, it would have been plausible to see joint signals even taking into account a worse sensitivity of the instruments of the time. At current time, there is only one event associated to a subthreshold GRB, compared to a long list of candidate events that would have been much more revealing. If these inconsistencies are admissible enough to lead to a claim, then the question arises about the interpretation of the long previous measurements carried out applying the same multimessenger observation method but without positive responses.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Measure Displacements of 10-19 Meters
    The technology behind LIGO: how to measure displacements of 10-19 meters The LIGO interferometers Interferometry: displacement sensing Noise limits Advanced LIGO "Colliding Black Holes" National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) 4pm today, 1 West: Results from science runs Alan Weinstein, Caltech AJW, UTeV, October 28, 2005 Gravitational wave detectors • Bar detectors • Invented and pursued by Joe Weber in the 60’s • Essentially, a large “bell”, set ringing (at ~ 900 Hz) by GW • Challenge: reduce noise (thermal ringing, readout) • Michelson interferometers • At least 4 independent discovery of method: • Pirani `56, Gerstenshtein and Pustovoit, Weber, Weiss `72 • Pioneering work by Weber and Robert Forward, in 60’s • Now: large, earth-based detectors. Soon: space-based (LISA). AJW, UTeV, October 28, 2005 Resonant bar detectors AURIGA bar near Padova, Italy (typical of some ~5 around the world – Maryland, LSU, Rome, CERN, UWA) 2.3 tons of Aluminum, 3m long; Cooled to 0.1K with dilution fridge in LHe cryostat Q = 4×106 at < 1K Fundamental resonant mode at ~900 Hz; narrow bandwidth Ultra-low-noise capacitive transducer and electronics (SQUID) AJW, UTeV, October 28, 2005 Resonant Bar detectors around the world International Gravitational Event Collaboration (IGEC) Baton Rouge, Legarno, CERN, Frascati, Perth, LA USA Italy Suisse Italy Australia AJW, UTeV, October 28, 2005 Interferometric detection of GWs GW acts on freely mirrors falling masses: laser Beam For fixed ability to splitter Dark port measure ΔL, make L photodiode
    [Show full text]
  • Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background: Detection Methods in Non-Gaussian Regimes
    Stochastic gravitational wave background : detection methods in non-Gaussian regimes Lionel Martellini To cite this version: Lionel Martellini. Stochastic gravitational wave background : detection methods in non-Gaussian regimes. Other. COMUE Université Côte d’Azur (2015 - 2019), 2017. English. NNT : 2017AZUR4031. tel-01587686 HAL Id: tel-01587686 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01587686 Submitted on 14 Sep 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. École doctorale Science Fondamentales et Appliquées Unité de recherche UMR 6161 Thèse de doctorat Présentée en vue de l’obtention du grade de docteur en Astrophysique Relativiste de l’UNIVERSITE COTE D’AZUR par Lionel Martellini Le Fond Gravitationnel Stochastique: Méthodes de Détection en Régimes Non-Gaussiens Dirigée par Tania Régimbau Soutenue le 23 Mai 2017 Devant le jury composé de : Mme Chiara Caprini, chargée de recherche CNRS, APC Examinatrice M. Nelson Christensen, directeur de recherche CNRS, OCA Examinateur M. Jean-Daniel Fournier, directeur de recherche CNRS, OCA Examinateur
    [Show full text]
  • Primordial Backgrounds of Relic Gravitons Arxiv:1912.07065V2 [Astro-Ph.CO] 19 Mar 2020
    Primordial backgrounds of relic gravitons Massimo Giovannini∗ Department of Physics, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland INFN, Section of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy Abstract The diffuse backgrounds of relic gravitons with frequencies ranging between the aHz band and the GHz region encode the ultimate information on the primeval evolution of the plasma and on the underlying theory of gravity well before the electroweak epoch. While the temperature and polarization anisotropies of the microwave background radiation probe the low-frequency tail of the graviton spectra, during the next score year the pulsar timing arrays and the wide-band interferometers (both terrestrial and hopefully space-borne) will explore a much larger frequency window encompassing the nHz domain and the audio band. The salient theoretical aspects of the relic gravitons are reviewed in a cross-disciplinary perspective touching upon various unsettled questions of particle physics, cosmology and astrophysics. CERN-TH-2019-166 arXiv:1912.07065v2 [astro-ph.CO] 19 Mar 2020 ∗Electronic address: [email protected] 1 Contents 1 The cosmic spectrum of relic gravitons 4 1.1 Typical frequencies of the relic gravitons . 4 1.1.1 Low-frequencies . 5 1.1.2 Intermediate frequencies . 6 1.1.3 High-frequencies . 7 1.2 The concordance paradigm . 8 1.3 Cosmic photons versus cosmic gravitons . 9 1.4 Relic gravitons and large-scale inhomogeneities . 13 1.4.1 Quantum origin of cosmological inhomogeneities . 13 1.4.2 Weyl invariance and relic gravitons . 13 1.4.3 Inflation, concordance paradigm and beyond . 14 1.5 Notations, units and summary . 14 2 The tensor modes of the geometry 17 2.1 The tensor modes in flat space-time .
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Support for KAGRA Operations
    Date: December 11, 2016 Ms. Yayoi Komatsu Director-General, Research Promotion Bureau, MEXT Mr. Norifumi Ushio Director, Scientific Research Institutes Division, Research Promotion Bureau, MEXT Dear Ms. Komatsu and Mr Ushio: On behalf of the Gravitational Wave International Committee (GWIC)*, I am writing to express our strong support for the Japanese KAGRA project, currently in an advanced state of commissioning at the Kamioka site. The recent detection of gravitational waves from the collision of two black holes by LIGO made world-wide headlines both in scientific circles and in the popular press. Future gravitational wave observations hold the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the universe. In addition to black hole collisions, other energetic cosmic phenomena – e.g., the violent formation of a black hole which may drive a gamma-ray burst, or the collapse and bounce of a stellar core leading to a supernova explosion – are difficult or impossible to observe electromagnetically, but emit gravitational waves which will permit us to study and understand these phenomena. There is an urgent scientific need for another detector of comparable sensitivity located in the other longitudinal hemisphere to come into operation simultaneously as soon as possible. Although LIGO alone was able to securely confirm that a burst of gravitational waves had struck the earth, it was severely limited in what it could measure about its sources. Early next year Virgo in Italy will begin observations with LIGO allowing fuller exploitation of some events, but many parts of the sky will still be poorly covered. Full exploitation of the gravitational waves requires a fourth detector operating in coincidence with LIGO and Virgo.
    [Show full text]