DOCSLIB.ORG

Record of Decision Vegetation Treatments Using Aminopyralid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Record of Decision Vegetation Treatments Using Aminopyralid RECORD OF DECISION TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................1-1 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................1-1 Background ................................................................................................................................................................1-1 DECISION .......................................................................................................................................................................2-1 Herbicide Active Ingredients Approved For Use .....................................................................................................2-1 Aminopyralid ......................................................................................................................................................2-1 Fluroxypyr ..........................................................................................................................................................2-1 Rimsulfuron ........................................................................................................................................................2-1 Treatment Acres.........................................................................................................................................................2-3 Herbicide Treatment Standard Operating Procedures ..............................................................................................2-3 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................................................................2-4 Monitoring .................................................................................................................................................................2-4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ..............................................................................................................................3-1 Alternative A – Continue Present Herbicide Use (No Action Alternative) .............................................................3-1 Alternative B – Allow for Use of Three New Herbicides in 17 Western States (Preferred Alternative) ...............3-1 Alternative C – No Aerial Application of New Herbicides......................................................................................3-1 Alternative D – No Use of New Acetolactate Synthase-Inhibiting Active Ingredients (No Rimsulfuron) ............3-1 Environmentally Preferable Alternative ...................................................................................................................3-1 MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS .....................................................................................................................4-1 General Herbicide Treatment Considerations ...........................................................................................................4-1 Selection of the Three New Active Ingredients ........................................................................................................4-1 Issues Considered in the Decision Process and Summary of Environmental Consequences of Decision .............4-2 Adverse Effects to Resources Evaluated in PEIS ..............................................................................................4-2 Beneficial Effects to Resources Evaluated in PEIS ...........................................................................................4-3 Measures to Minimize or Avoid Harm .....................................................................................................................4-4 Standard Operating Procedures and Mitigation .................................................................................................4-4 Comparison of the Alternatives and Development of the Decision .........................................................................4-4 Alternative A – Continue Present Herbicide Use (No Action Alternative) ......................................................4-5 Alternative B – Allow for Use of Three New Herbicides in 17 Western States (Preferred Alternative) ........4-5 Alternative C – No Aerial Application of New Herbicides ..............................................................................4-5 Alternative D – No Use of New Acetolactate Synthase-Inhibiting Active Ingredients (No Rimsulfuron) .....4-6 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ...........................................................................................................................................5-1 Development of the Draft Programmatic EIS ...........................................................................................................5-1 Scoping Meetings ...............................................................................................................................................5-1 Public Review and Comment on the Draft Programmatic EIS .........................................................................5-1 Development of the Final Programmatic EIS and Preferred Alternative ................................................................5-1 Public Review of the Final Programmatic EIS ..................................................................................................5-2 Signature Page ...........................................................................................................................................................5-3 REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................................................................6-1 BLM Vegetation Treatments Three New Herbicides i August 2016 Final Programmatic EIS Record of Decision TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendices A Herbicide Treatment Standard Operating Procedures and Mitigation Measures ........................................... A-1 B Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service ...................................................................................................................................B-1 C Monitoring .........................................................................................................................................................C-1 List of Tables 1 Herbicide Active Ingredients Approved for Use on Public Lands under this Record of Decision ................. 2-2 2 Mitigation Measures .......................................................................................................................................... 2-5 BLM Vegetation Treatments Three New Herbicides ii August 2016 Final Programmatic EIS Record of Decision INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The BLM has identified aminopyralid, fluroxypyr, and Summary rimsulfuron as three new herbicide active ingredients This Record of Decision (ROD) approves the U.S. that it would like to add to its list of approved active Department of the Interior (USDOI) Bureau of Land ingredients for use on public lands. These active Management’s (BLM’s) proposed use of the herbicide ingredients were identified based on input from BLM active ingredients aminopyralid, fluroxypyr, and field offices and a preliminary assessment of their rimsulfuron to treat vegetation on BLM-administered effectiveness and suitability for the BLM’s vegetation lands in the western U.S. These three herbicides are treatment needs. The three new herbicides have been being added to the BLM’s list of active ingredients registered for use by the U.S. Environmental Protection available for use on public lands under previously Agency (USEPA), are deemed effective in controlling approved vegetation management programs. vegetation, and have minimal effects on the environment and human health if used according to herbicide label instructions. The BLM determined that Background use of the new herbicides on public lands under established vegetation management programs required The BLM administers vegetation on nearly 247 million further assessment under the National Environmental acres in 17 states in the western U.S. (Alaska, Arizona, Policy Act (NEPA). California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, A Final Programmatic Environmental Impact South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Statement for Vegetation Treatments Using Wyoming). Management of vegetation on public lands, Aminopyralid, Fluroxypyr, and Rimsulfuron on Bureau including habitat enhancement and management to of Land Management Lands in 17 Western States was reduce the risk of wildfires, is an important function of released to the public on April 8, 2016 (USDOI BLM this agency. Vegetation treatments using herbicides are 2016). In accordance with NEPA, this PEIS identifies one method employed by the BLM to manage invasive impacts on the natural and human environment plants that jeopardize the health of public lands and the associated with the use of aminopyralid, fluroxypyr, and activities that occur on them. rimsulfuron to treat vegetation on BLM-administered lands. The current PEIS incorporates information from In 2007, the BLM published a Vegetation Treatments the 2007 PEIS by reference, but also provides updated Using Herbicides
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abstract Effects of Wildfire on Water Quality and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities of a Chihuahuan Desert Spring System
    ABSTRACT EFFECTS OF WILDFIRE ON WATER QUALITY AND BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITIES OF A CHIHUAHUAN DESERT SPRING SYSTEM by Tara Jo Haan Wildfire disturbances affect resource availability and alter community composition in arid environments. Traditionally, fire effects on arid-land aquatic ecosystems are under-studied compared to terrestrial ecosystems. Chihuahuan Desert spring systems offer a unique opportunity to study such effects on macroinvertebrate community resistance and resilience. I took advantage of a rare opportunity to employ a BACI design to observe changes in water quality and macroinvertebrate communities to wildfire in a spring system on Bitter Lake National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico. The results suggest significant water quality and species-specific response to wildfire. I observed an increase in an endangered snail, Juturnia kosteri, but there were no significant community-based changes. These results suggest that arid-land aquatic communities can be resistant to abiotic/biotic changes caused by wildland fire. With climate change predicted to increase the frequency and intensity of arid-land fires, aquatic communities may be more vulnerable to severe events in the future. EFFECTS OF WILDFIRE ON WATER QUALITY AND BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITIES OF A CHIHUAHUAN DESERT SPRING SYSTEM A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Zoology by Tara Jo Haan Miami University Oxford, OH 2012 Advisor _______________________ Dr. David J. Berg Reader _______________________ Dr. Craig Williamson Reader _______________________ Dr. Ann L. Rypstra TABLE OF CONTENTS List of tables iii List of figures iv List of appendices v Acknowledgements vi 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea: Amphipoda) in Texas and New Mexico, Usa
    ANALYSIS OF THE GAMMARUS-PECOS COMPLEX (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA) IN TEXAS AND NEW MEXICO, USA GERALD A. COLE Route 4, Box 892 Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ABSTRACT A comparative study was made of representatives from seven populations of Gammarus in Texan and New Mexican fresh-to-miohaline waters in areas once overlain by Permian seas. They included the described species: G. pecos Cole and Bousfield (symbolized P) from Pecos Co., TX; G. hyalelloides Cole (H) from Phantom Lake Spring, Jeff Davis Co., TX; and G. desperatus Cole (D) from Chaves Co., NM. Members of other populations were examined from: San Solomon Spring (S), Toyahvale, Reeves Co., TX; a large species (C) co-occurring with H in Phantom Lake Spring; a small form (M) that came either from Phantom Lake Spring or from a spring 350 m to the north; and a species (E) from a pool near Carlsbad, Eddy Co., NM. All members of the group lack calceoli, bear C-setae on their mandibular palps, and have narrow oostegites. Coxae 1-4, in the larger individuals, are armed abundantly with long setae, and all animals have at least one spine at the posterodistal corner of the first peduncular article of the antennule. Twenty Mann-Whitney U tests were applied to certain morphologic attributes of the seven populations. The results suggest that: P and S are conspecific, with the latter showing some affinities to the larger animals (C) in the nearby Phantom Lake Spring system; C probably is a new species although more closely related to M and H than are the other four; G.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Tuesday, August 9, 2005 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing Roswell springsnail, Koster’s springsnail, Noel’s amphipod, and Pecos assiminea as Endangered With Critical Habitat; Final Rule VerDate jul<14>2003 18:26 Aug 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09AUR2.SGM 09AUR2 46304 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: in coastal brackish waters or along tropical and temperate seacoasts Background Fish and Wildlife Service worldwide (Taylor 1987). Inland species It is our intent to discuss only those of the genus Assiminea are known from 50 CFR Part 17 topics directly relevant to this final around the world, and in North America listing determination. For more RIN 1018–AI15 they occur in California (Death Valley information on the four invertebrates, National Monument), Utah, New Endangered and Threatened Wildlife refer to the February 12, 2002, proposed Mexico, Texas (Pecos and Reeves and Plants; Listing Roswell rule (67 FR 6459). However, some of Counties), and Mexico (Bolso´n de springsnail, Koster’s springsnail, this information is discussed in our Cuatro Cı´enegas). Noel’s amphipod, and Pecos analyses below, such as the summary of The Roswell springsnail and Koster’s assiminea as Endangered With Critical factors affecting the species. springsnail are aquatic species. These Habitat Springsnails snails have lifespans of 9 to 15 months and reproduce several times during the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, The Permian Basin of the spring through fall breeding season Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited Designation of Critical Habitat for Roswell Springsnail, Koster’S Springsnail, Noel’S Amphipod, and Pecos Assiminea Docket No
    Literature Cited Designation of Critical Habitat for Roswell Springsnail, Koster’s Springsnail, Noel’s Amphipod, and Pecos Assiminea Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2009-0014, May 2011 Bailey, J.K., J.A. Schweitzer, and T.G. Whitham. 2001. Salt cedar negatively affects biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates. Wetlands 21:442-447. Balleau , W.P., R.A. Woford, D.M. Romero, and S.E. Silver. 1999. Source-water protection zones for Bitter Lake National Wildlife Refuge. Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM. 42 pp. Berg, D.J. 2010. Status of the Rio Hondo population of Noel’s amphipod (Gammarus desperatus). Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM. 3 pp. Boghici, R. 1997. Hydrogeological investigations at Diamond Y Springs and surrounding area, Pecos County, Texas. M.A. Thesis. University of Texas at Austin. 120 pp. Boylen, C.W. and T.D. Brock. 1973. Bacterial decomposition properties in Lake Wingra sediments during winter. Limnology and Oceanography 18:628-634. Bureau of Land Management. 2002. Habitat protection zone environmental assessment. EA-NM- 060-00-030. Roswell, Field Office, Roswell, NM. Burton, G.A. Jr. and R.E. Pitt. 2002. Ecosystem component characterization. Chapter 6 in Stormwater Effects Handbook: A Toolbox for Watershed Managers, Scientists, and Engineers. Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Brune, G. 1981. Springs of Texas. Branch-Smith, Inc. Fort Worth, Texas. Christensen, J.H., B. Hewitson, A. Busuioc, A. Chen, X. Gao, I. Held, R. Jones, R.K. Kolli, W.- T. Kwon, R. Laprise, V. Magaña Rueda, L.Mearns, C.G. Menéndez, J. Räisänen, A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Biological Assessment for the Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Suppression Program in New Mexico
    2020 Biological Assessment For the Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Suppression Program in New Mexico 01/24/2020 Prepared by USDA, APHIS, PPQ 270 South 17th Street Las Cruces, NM 88005 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT (BA) FOR STATE CONSULTATION AND CONFERENCE FOR 2020 GH/MC PROGRAMS IN NEW MEXICO 2020 Biological Assessment for the Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Suppression Program, New Mexico 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), in conjunction with other Federal agencies, State departments of agriculture, land management groups, and private individuals, is planning to conduct grasshopper control programs in New Mexico in 2020. This document is intended as state-wide consultation and conference with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) regarding the APHIS Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Suppression Program. Beginning in 1987, APHIS has consulted with the FWS on a national level for the Rangeland Grasshopper Cooperative Management Program. Biological Opinions (BO) were issued annually by FWS from 1987 through 1995 for the national program. A letter dated October 3, 1995 from FWS to APHIS concurred with buffers and other measures agreed to by APHIS for New Mexico and superseded all previous consultations. Since then, funding constraints and other considerations have drastically reduced grasshopper/Mormon cricket suppression activities. APHIS is requesting initiation of informal consultation for the implementation of the 2020 Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Suppression Program on rangeland in New Mexico. Our determinations of effect for listed species, proposed candidate species, critical habitat, and proposed critical habitat are based on the October 3, 1995 FWS letter, the analysis provided in the 2019 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for APHIS suppression activities in 17 western states, and local discussions with FWS.
    [Show full text]
  • Lang 1999 Status of Aquatic Mollusks of New Mexico E-20-7.Pdf
    Appendix A. Management recommendations for state-listed and federal Candidate species and Species of Concern macro invertebrates of New Mexico, E-20-7. Management Recommendations for State-listed and Federal Candidate Species and Species of Concern Macroinvertebrates of New Mexico under Section 6 Project E-20-7 Noel's Amphipod (Gammarus desperatus) Status: Monthly (1995-1998) censuses ofmacroinvertebrates at the Bitter Lake National WildlifeRefuge (BLNWR) documented a second population of G. desperatus in Sago Springs complex. This species was known heretofore only fromBitter Creek ("Lost River"; Cole 1988), and extirpated from North Spring ofthe Roswell Country Club (RCC) and Lander Springbrook, Chaves County (Cole 1981, 1985). From June 1995 to May 1996, the relative abundance of G. desperatus in 2 2 Bitter Creek was 64-8768 amphipods/m compared to lower densities (26-575 amphipods/m ) in Sago Springs complex. A satellite population of G. desperatus was recently documented by Dr. M. E. Gordon in a ditch along the west shore line ofrefugeUnit 6 (B. K. Lang,pers. obs.). Gammarus desperatus appears restricted to wetland habitats ofthe BLNWR, as exploratory aquatic inventories in southeasternNew Mexico during the past fouryears have documented only hyalellid amphipods (NMGF files). Cole (1981, 1985, 1988) considered the species a narrow endemic known only fromisolated populations in Chaves County, New Mexico. Gammarus desperatus occurs sympatrically with three macroinvertebrate tax.apossessing state and federalstatus (Table 1), the federalendangered Pecos gambusia, and the proposed endangered Pecos pupfish, that inhabit surface waters of Bitter Creek and Sago Springs complex ofthe BLNWR. Potential adverse impacts of oil and gas activities along the Pecos River (USFWS 1997b) underscore the imminence ofthreats (see Appendix B, attached) to the long­ term viability of G.
    [Show full text]
  • THREATENED and ENDANGERED SPECIES of NEW MEXICO 2008 Biennial Review and Recommendations
    THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF NEW MEXICO 2008 BIENNIAL REVIEW DRAFT First Public Comment Period March 11, 2008 New Mexico Department of Game and Fish Conservation Services Division DRAFT 2008 Biennial Review of T & E Species of NM, 3/11/08 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF NEW MEXICO 2008 Biennial Review and Recommendations Authority: Wildlife Conservation Act (17-2-37 through 17-2-46 NMSA 1978) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A total of 118 species and subspecies are on the 2008 list of threatened and endangered New Mexico wildlife. The list includes 2 crustaceans, 25 mollusks, 23 fishes, 6 amphibians, 15 reptiles, 32 birds and 15 mammals (Tables 1, 2). An additional 7 species of mammals has been listed as restricted to facilitate control of traffic in federally protected species. A species is endangered if it is in jeopardy of extinction or extirpation from the state; a species is threatened if it is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range in New Mexico. Species or subspecies of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fishes, mollusks, and crustaceans native to New Mexico may be listed as threatened or endangered under the Wildlife Conservation Act (WCA). During the Biennial Review, species may be upgraded from threatened to endangered, or downgraded from endangered to threatened, based upon data, views, and information regarding the biological and ecological status of the species. Investigations for new listings or removals from the list (delistings) can be undertaken at any time, but require additional procedures from those for the Biennial Review. The 2006 Biennial Review contained a recommendation for maintaining the status for 119 species and subspecies listed as threatened, endangered, or restricted under the WCA, and uplisting four species (Arizona grasshopper sparrow, Pecos bluntnose shiner, spikedace, and meadow jumping mouse ) from threatened to endangered and downlisting two species (shortneck snaggletooth and piping plover) from endangered to threatened.
    [Show full text]
  • INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY STRUCTURE and HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS in the ARID DAVIS MOUNTAINS REGION of WEST TEXAS by Nina Noreika, B.S
    INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS IN THE ARID DAVIS MOUNTAINS REGION OF WEST TEXAS by Nina Noreika, B.S. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science with a Major in Aquatic Resources May 2019 Committee Members: Weston Nowlin, Chair Astrid Schwalb Benjamin Schwartz Chad Norris COPYRIGHT by Nina Noreika 2019 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Nina Noreika, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Weston Nowlin. He was always my biggest advocate and always pushed me to think bigger. Weston saw me through a lot of life changes during my time at Texas State University and I will be forever grateful for his unwavering support. He taught me what a true advisor should be. I am not often sweet, so I hope he does not take any of my kind words as sarcasm. I’d also like to thank Chad Norris for organizing and implementing this project, I always appreciated the way that Chad would ask my opinion and include me in planning, he always treated me as an equal rather than a lowly grad student.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gammarus-Pecos Complex (Crustacea: Amphipoda), Texas-New Mexico, Usa
    THE GAMMARUS-PECOS COMPLEX (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA), TEXAS-NEW MEXICO, USA Gerald A. Cole Rte. 4, Box 892, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ABSTRACT A comparative study was made of representatives from seven popu- lations of Gammarus in Texan and New Mexican fresh-to-miohaline waters in areas once overlain by Permian seas. They included the described / species: G.,/0ecos Cole and Bousfield (symbolized P) from Pecos Co., TX; G. hyalelloides Cole (H) from Phantom Lake Spring, Jeff Davis Co., TX; and G. desperatus Cole (D) from Chaves Co., NM. Members of other pop- ulations were examined from: San Solomon Spring (S), Toyahvale, Reeves Co., TX; a large species (C) co-occurring with H in Phantom Lake Spring; a small form (M) that came either from Phantom Lake Spring or from a spring 350 m to the north; and a species (E) from a pool near Carlsbad, Eddy Co., NM. All members of the group lack calceoli, bear C-setae on their mandibular palps, and have narrow ogstegites. Coxae 1-4, in the larger individuals, are armed abundantly with long setae, and all animals have at least one spine at the posterodistal corner of the first peduncular article of the antennule. Twenty Mann-Whitney U tests were applied to certain morphologic attributes of the seven populations. The results suggest that: P and S are conspecific, with the latter showing some affinities to the larger animals (C) in the nearby Phantom Lake Spring system; C probably is a new species although more closely related to M and H than are the other four; G.
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School Certificate for Approving The
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Richard A. Seidel Candidate for the Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Director Dr. David J. Berg Reader Dr. Brian Keane Reader Dr. Nancy G. Solomon Reader Dr. Bruce A. Steinly Jr. Graduate School Representative Dr. A. John Bailer ABSTRACT CONSERVATION BIOLOGY OF THE GAMMARUS PECOS SPECIES COMPLEX: ECOLOGICAL PATTERNS ACROSS AQUATIC HABITATS IN AN ARID ECOSYSTEM by Richard A. Seidel This dissertation consists of three chapters, each of which addresses a topic in one of three related categories of research as required by the Ph.D. program in ecology as directed through the Department of Zoology at Miami University. Chapter 1, Phylogeographic analysis reveals multiple cryptic species of amphipods (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in Chihuahuan Desert springs, investigates how biodiversity conservation and the identification of conservation units among invertebrates are complicated by low levels of morphological difference, particularly among aquatic taxa. Accordingly, biodiversity is often underestimated in communities of aquatic invertebrates, as revealed by high genetic divergence between cryptic species. I analyzed PCR-amplified portions of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene and 16S rRNA gene for amphipods in the Gammarus pecos species complex endemic to springs in the Chihuahuan Desert of southeast New Mexico and west Texas. My analyses uncover the presence of seven separate species in this complex, of which only three nominal taxa are formally described. The distribution of these species is highly correlated with geography, with many present only in one spring or one spatially-restricted cluster of springs, indicating that each species likely merits protection under the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Zuni Fleabane
    Roswell springsnail (Pyrgulopsis roswellensis) Koster’s springsnail (Juturnia kosteri) Noel’s amphipod (Gammarus desperatus) Pecos assiminea (Assiminea pecos) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Roswell springsnail Koster’s springsnail Noel’s amphipod Pecos assiminea Photos by Brian Lang, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office Albuquerque, New Mexico 2 5-YEAR REVIEW Roswell springsnail (Pyrgulopsis roswellensis), Koster’s springsnail (Juturnia kosteri), Noel’s amphipod (Gammarus desperatus), Pecos assiminea (Assiminea pecos) 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Reviewers Lead Region: Region 2 (Southwest) Regional Office Susan Jacobson, Chief Threatened and Endangered Species, 505-248-6641; Wendy Brown, Recovery Coordinator, 505-248-6664; Maggie Dwire, Recovery Biologist, 505-248-6666. Lead Field Office: New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office Susan Oetker, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 505-761-4761. Cooperating Offices: Jeff Sanchez, Biologist, Bitter Lake National Wildlife Refuge, 575-622-6755; Brian Lang, Invertebrate Biologist, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, 505-476-8108. 1.2 Methodology used to complete the review This review was conducted through public review notification and a comprehensive review of all documents regarding the Roswell springsnail, Koster’s springsnail, Noel’s amphipod, and Pecos assiminea (four invertebrates) that were available to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office (NMESFO). The Federal Register (FR) notice (74 FR 6917) announcing this review was published on February 11, 2009, and solicited new information about species biology, habitat conditions, conservation measures implemented, threats, trends, and significant portion of the range from other agencies, both Federal and State, non-governmental organizations, academia, and the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Collections of New Mexican Amphipod Crustaceans
    ; Citation: Cole, G. A. 1988b. A report on the status of Amphipoda, including Gammarus desperatus in New Mexico. Report submitted to the Endangered Species Program, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish under Professional Services Contract 519-77-02, Santa Fe, New Mexico. ABSTRACT Collections of New Mexican amphipod crustaceans were made during the first week of May, 1988. In the Rio Honda, Lincoln Co., an adult female Gammarus and some immature specimens were found to be referable to G. lacustris Sars. Also, there were examples of Hyalella that differed morphologically from those taken at the other collecting sites. North Spring at the Roswell Country Club, Chaves Co., was found to have been roofed-over and walled-up. There were amplexing Hyalella beneath debris in a shallow spring outflow, but no examples of Gammarus desperatus Cole could be found. It was impossible to collect in the depression where _§. desperatus once occurred. In the Bitter Lake National Wildlife Refuge specimens of Hyalella were taken from a sinkhole and from a small section of lost River. These were much like the Hyalella from Roswell. Also from lost River an oviger­ our female Gammarus and a larger male were taken. The latter had lost most of its antennular flagella , but it could be compared to _!h desperatus. and other members of the Gammarus-pecos complex. Careful comparisons of these two specimens with data derived from study of _!h desperatus and closely related forms imply that the lost River animals are related very closely to..§..:_ desperatus and may be conspecific with it, despite some vari­ ation.
    [Show full text]