DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Entomologists, 1966. BERNICE P. BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU: 50 PP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pacific Entomologists, 1966. BERNICE P. BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU: 50 PP Publication: Koehler,I.M. 1966: Pacific entomologists, 1966. BERNICE P. BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU: 50 PP This article has been provided by the BUGZ project and is for private use only and not for reproduction in any form etc, and we do not guarantee the quality of the scan, nor the correctness of the text layer relating to each page image. Project coordinators: Raphael Didham & Stephen Pawson Content scanning, OCR and cleanup by: Carl Wardhaugh, Katherine Wilson, Stephanie Kaefer, Chris Coleman, Muriele Rabone, Miriam Hall and James Aulsford Interface and database developed by: Mike Cochrane & Mark Fuglestad Project funded by: TFBIS (Terrestrial and Freshwater Biodiversity Information System) (The pages of the publication follow this cover sheet) PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGISTS 1966 Compiled by Use M. Koehler INTRODUCTION This publication lists 949 persons working on or actively interested in the insects of the Pacific area. It gives the address of each and a statement regarding his interests or specialties. Both of these are indexed at the end of the directory. The first published list of entomologists of the Pacific area was prepared by the Standing Committee on Pacific Entomology of the Pacific Science Association and mimeographed at Bernice P. Bishop Museum in December 1955, under the direction of Dr. J. Linsley Gr'essitt, chairman of the committee. Supplements to that list were made in April 1956, June 1958, and March 1961. In all of these the names were arranged by countries of residence. The present publication lists the names in alphabetical sequence, the country and institution with -which each is affiliated being indicated in the Residence index. Much assistance in preparing this revised directory has been received from the entomologists of Bishop Museum, especially Miss Setsuko Nakata, Administra­ tive Assistant to the Chairman of the Museum's Entomology Department. Bishop Museum has developed close cooperation with many specialists on groups of insects found in the Pacific region during more than forty years. No one institution can have specialists on all groups of insects and other land arthropods; and specialists can have access to extensive collections largely through inter-institutional loans. This form of cooperation became international in scope in the 1920's when Bishop Museum worked with the British Museum in producing Insects of Samoa. It con­ tinued with reports on insects collected by the Pacific Entomological Survey (1929 -1932), the Mangarevan Expedition (1934),, the Guam insect survey (1936), the Micronesian Expedition (1936), expeditions to Samoa and Fiji (1937 and 1940), and a number of other collections received prior to World War II. Following that war, cooperative research expanded greatly in working up the insects of Micronesia, under the direction of Dr. Gressitt, which led to extensive investigations in Mela­ nesia, Indonesia, Southeastern Asia, and Antarctica, supported by grants from U.S. government agencies. We are well aware of the possibilities of errors and omissions in this publi­ cation. During its compilation, a postal card was addressed to each person whose name we had, asking for additions and corrections. It also stated: "If we do not hear from you, we will assume that you are no longer interested and you will not be included in the list. " Through oversight, this may have led to the omission of some persons who should have been included. We should be glad to learn of others whose names should appear in future revisions. A copy of this directory is being sent to every person listed in it. What is desired in return is that the Pacific Scientific Information Center be kept informed as to changes of address and interest and, if you think well of the following outlined plan, that we be provided with other information which might be helpful. PROPOSED NEWSLETTER in order to keep in touch with persons working on or actively interested in entomological subjects, with special reference to the Pacific area, it has been proposed that a newsletter with some such title as "Entomologists in the Pacific" be issued. This would present information on current research, collecting, and other activities, resulting publications, and changes of address and interests. Copies of publications sent to the Center could be reviewed, and requests, queries, and problems could be interchanged. All this would help to keep Pacific entomologists in touch with each other, and also to keep the directory up-to-date. If persons sympathetic with these objectives will cooperate, the Center will undertake the compilation, publication, and distribution of such a Newsletter. Please let us hear from you. We would also be glad to receive copies of your publications. ^ Edwin H. Bryan, Jr., Manager Pacific Scientific Information Center Bernice P. Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawaii 96819 Abe, Yasuo Amherst, Massachusetts 01002 Professor (Tipulidae of the world) Department of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology Amerson, Arthur Binion, Jr. Faculty of Medicine Division of Birds Kagoshima University U.S. National Museum 82 Shiroyama-cho 7 Smithsonian Institution Kagoshima City, Japan Washington, D. C. 20560 (Morphology, ecology &: control (Acarina associated with birds & their of medical insects) nests. Parasitic & predacious mites; Cheyletidae) Ackland, D. M. Hope Department of Entomology Anastos, George University Museum Department of Zoology Oxford, England University of Maryland (Anthomyiidae) College Park, Maryland 20742 (Ixodides) Adams, E.E. "Mounangee" Anderson, Jenny (Mrs.) Edungalba, Q. C. R. Curator Queensland, Australia Macleay Museum (Coleoptera; Lepidoptera) University of Sydney Sydney, N. S.W. Adams, Phillip A. Australia Biological Sciences (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) California State College Fullerton, California 926 31 Anderson, W. H. (Neuroptera) Entomology Research Division Plant Industry Station Ae, S. Beltsville, Maryland 20705 Biological Laboratory (Coleoptera larvae) Nanzan University Showa-ku, Nagoya Andison, H. Japan Canada Department of Agriculture (Rhopalocera - Genetics) Research Branch Experimental Farm Ah, Hyong-Sun Saanichton, B.C. Medical Zoology Services Canada 5th Preventive Medicine Unit (Svc)(Fld) (Insects & mites affecting nursery stock) 65th Medical Group, APO 301 San Francisco, California Ando, Hiroshi (Korea) Associate Professor (Medical &: veterinary acarology) Sugadaira Biological Laboratory of Tokyo Kyoiku University Ainscough, Brian D. Sanada - ma chi Biology Department Chiisagata-gun, Nagano Pref. Brunei College Japan Woodlands Avenue (Embryology of insects, esp. London, W„ 3, England Odonata, Mecoptera) (Uropodina, incl. Trachytoidea, Thinozerconoidea & Protodinychoidea. Andrewartha, H. G. Morphology, ecology & Systematics) Department of Zoology University of Adelaide Alexander, Charles P. Adelaide, South Australia 39 Old Town Road (Ecology, Diapause) Angel, F. M. Arunin, Aphirat 293 Fullarton Road Department of Agriculture Parkside, South Australia Bangkok, Thailand (Lepidoptera) (Insect morphology) Angus, D. Asahina, Eizo Department of Zoology Professor of Biology University of Queensland Head, Biology Section St. Lucia The Institute of Low Temperature Science Brisbane, Queensland Hokkaido University Australia Sapporo, Japan (Genetics: Drosophila spp. ) (Insect physiology, esp. frost-resistance) Aoki, Jun-ichi Asahina, Syoziro Department of Zoology Chief, Medical Entomology Section National Science Museum National Institute of Health Ueno Park Kamiosaki, Shinagawa-ku Tokyo, Japan Tokyo, Japan (Acarina: Oribatei & other (Medical Entomology; Blattaria, soil-inhabiting mites) Grylloblattoidea; Odonata; Magaloptera) Ardley, J.H. Asanuma, Kiyoshi Entomologist Entomological Section School of Public Health & Research Institute for Natural Tropical Medicine Resources The University Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku-ku Sydney, N. S.W. Tokyo, Japan Australia (Trombiculidae) (Medical Entomology: Filth Fly Ecology, esp. Musca domestica; Ashby, C.F. Ceratopogonidae: Palpomyia - 33 Dan Street Bezzia group) Graceville, Brisbane Queensland, Australia Arikul, Sutham (Diptera: Syrphidae) Kasetsart University Bangkok, Thailand Ashlock, Peter D. (Insect physiology) Department of Entomology Bernice P. Bishop Museum Armstrong, Robert K. Honolulu, Hawaii 96819 U.S. Army Pacific (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) 948th PM Detachment Vietnam Aslet, Olive (Medical Entomology) 70 The Drive Concord West, N.S.W. Arnaud, Paul H. , Jr. Australia Department of Entomology (Sericulture: diseases, rearings) California Academy of Sciences San Francisco, California 94118 Atyeo, W. T. (Diptera: Tachinidae) Department of Entomology University of Nebraska Arnett, Ross H, , Jr. Lincoln, Nebraska 68503 Department of Biology (Acarina: Bdelloidea, Analgoidea) Catholic University of America Washington, D. C. 20017 Au, Stephen (Oedemeridae of the world) State Department of Agriculture Hawaii Lihue, Kauai, Hawaii 96766 (Oribatei, Tarsonemini) (Plant Quarantine & Biological control activities) Baltazar, Clare R. Bureau of Plant Industry Audy, J.R. Manila, Philippines Director (Hymenoptera) The George Williams Hooper Foundation Balthasar, V. San Francisco Medical Center Lublanska 17 University of California Praha II, Czechoslovakia San Francisco, California 94122 (Scarabaeinae, Troginae) (Acarina) Banaag, Avelino F. Bailey, S. F. Entomologist, Public Works Center Department of Entomology United States Navy, Maintenance University of California Department Davis, California 95616 Subic Bay, Philippines (Thysanoptera; Mosquito ecology) (Insecticides) Bailey, S.W. Barber,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 40 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 Numbers 3 & Article 9 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 October 2007 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price University of Wisconsin Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Price, Michele B. and Young, Daniel K. 2007. "An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 40 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol40/iss2/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Price and Young: An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Cole 2007 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 177 AN Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price1 and Daniel K. Young1 ABSTRACT The first comprehensive survey of Wisconsin Endomychidae was initiated in 1998. Throughout Wisconsin sampling sites were selected based on habitat type and sampling history. Wisconsin endomychids were hand collected from fungi and under tree bark; successful trapping methods included cantharidin- baited pitfall traps, flight intercept traps, and Lindgren funnel traps. Examina- tion of literature records, museum and private collections, and field research yielded 10 species, three of which are new state records. Two dubious records, Epipocus unicolor Horn and Stenotarsus hispidus (Herbst), could not be con- firmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Endomychidae: Leiestinae) with a Checklist and Nomenclatural Notes Regarding Fossil Endomychidae
    Zootaxa 3755 (4): 391–400 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3755.4.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:13446D49-76A1-4C12-975E-F59106AF4BD3 Glesirhanis bercioi, a new genus and species from Baltic amber (Coleoptera: Endomychidae: Leiestinae) with a checklist and nomenclatural notes regarding fossil Endomychidae FLOYD W. SHOCKLEY1& VITALY I. ALEKSEEV2 1Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, MRC 165, Washington, DC 20013-7012, U.S.A. Email: [email protected] 2Department of Zootechny, Kaliningrad State Technical University, Sovetsky av. 1. 236000, Kaliningrad, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new genus and species of handsome fungus beetle, Glesirhanis bercioi gen. nov., sp. nov. (Coleoptera: Endomychidae: Leiestinae) is described from Baltic amber. The newly described genus is compared with all known extant and extinct genera of the subfamily. A key to the genera of Leiestinae including fossils and a checklist of fossil Endomychidae are provided. The status of two taxa previously placed in Endomychidae, Palaeoendomychus gymnus Zhang and Tetrameropsis mesozoica Kirejtshuk & Azar, is discussed, and a new status for the latter, elevating it to the family-level as Tetrameropseidae status nov., is proposed. Key words: new genus, new species, new status, Coleoptera, Endomychidae, Leiestinae, Baltic amber, Tertiary, Eocene, key, checklist, fossil Introduction Baltic amber (succinite) constitutes the largest known deposit of fossil plant resin and the richest repository of fossil insects of any age. Unfortunately, most references to Coleoptera in Baltic amber are only determined to family or generic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY ENDOMYCHIDAE (Handsome Fungus Beetles)
    FAMILY ENDOMYCHIDAE (Handsome fungus beetles) J.M. Campbell This family is found in most regions of the world, but the majority of species occur in tropical areas. The ranges of 15 species extend northwards into Canada. Adults and larvae may be collected on soft fungi and in leaf litter or under bark with fungal growth. One species, Mycetaea subterranea (M. hirta in most publications), is a pest of stored products. Most species feed on fungi. Because of their moderately large size and often bright coloration, many North American species are taxonomically well known. However, the family has never been revised for North America. The genera of the world were reviewed by Strohecker (1953) and Hatch (1962) treated the genera and species occurring in the Pacific Northwest. A modern revision of the North American species of this family is needed. NT (1); BC (7); AB (2); SK (1); MB (4); ON (10); PQ (7); NB (2); NS (6); PE (1); NF (2); I (2) Subfamily MYCETAEINAE Tribe Mycetaeini Genus SYMBIOTES Redtenbacher S. duryi Blatchley - - - - - - - ON - - - - - - lacustris Casey montanus Casey oblongus Casey pilosus Casey waltoni Dury S. gibberosus (Lucas)+ - - - - - - - ON - - - - - - montanus Casey Genus MYCETAEA Stephens M. subterranea (Fabricius)+ - - - BC - - - ON PQ - NS PE - NF fumata Stephens hirta (Marsham) Tribe Leiestini Key to North American species: Blaisdell (1931) Genus RHANIDEA Strohecker Rhanis LeConte R. unicolor (Ziegler) - - - - - - - ON PQ - - - - - apicalis (Melsheimer) haemorrhoidalis (Guérin-Méneville) Genus STETHORHANIS Blaisdell S. borealis Blaisdell - - - BC - - - - - - - - - - Genus PHYMAPHORA Newman P. californica Horn - - - BC - - - - - - - - - - P. pulchella Newman - - - - - - MB ON PQ - NS - - - crassicornis (Melsheimer) puncticollis (Ziegler) Subfamily STENOTARSINAE Tribe Stenotarsini Genus DANAE Reiche D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Introduction and Key to Families
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Vol. IV. Part 1. HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS COLEOPTERA INTRODUCTION AND KEYS TO FAMILIES By R. A. CROWSON LONDON Published by the Society and Sold at its Rooms 41, Queen's Gate, S.W. 7 31st December, 1956 Price-res. c~ . HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS The aim of this series of publications is to provide illustrated keys to the whole of the British Insects (in so far as this is possible), in ten volumes, as follows : I. Part 1. General Introduction. Part 9. Ephemeroptera. , 2. Thysanura. 10. Odonata. , 3. Protura. , 11. Thysanoptera. 4. Collembola. , 12. Neuroptera. , 5. Dermaptera and , 13. Mecoptera. Orthoptera. , 14. Trichoptera. , 6. Plecoptera. , 15. Strepsiptera. , 7. Psocoptera. , 16. Siphonaptera. , 8. Anoplura. 11. Hemiptera. Ill. Lepidoptera. IV. and V. Coleoptera. VI. Hymenoptera : Symphyta and Aculeata. VII. Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea. VIII. Hymenoptera : Cynipoidea, Chalcidoidea, and Serphoidea. IX. Diptera: Nematocera and Brachycera. X. Diptera: Cyclorrhapha. Volumes 11 to X will be divided into parts of convenient size, but it is not possible to specify in advance the taxonomic content of each part. Conciseness and cheapness are main objectives in this new series, and each part will be the work of a specialist, or of a group of specialists.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Index of Keys
    Draft Index of Keys This document will be an update of the taxonomic references contained within Hawking 20001 which can still be purchased from MDFRC on (02) 6024 9650 or [email protected]. We have made the descision to make this draft version publicly available so that other taxonomy end-users may have access to the information during the refining process and also to encourage comment on the usability of the keys referred to or provide information on other keys that have not been reffered to. Please email all comments to [email protected]. 1Hawking, J.H. (2000) A preliminary guide to keys and zoological information to identify invertebrates form Australian freshwaters. Identification Guide No. 2 (2nd Edition), Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology: Albury Index of Keys Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Major Group ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Minor Group ................................................................................................................................................... 8 Order .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Head Structures of Larvae of Sphindidae and Protocucujidae (Coleóptera: Cucujoidea)
    Eur. J. Entorno?. 98: 219-232, 2001 ISSN 1210-5759 Comparative study of head structures of larvae of Sphindidae and Protocucujidae (Coleóptera: Cucujoidea) Rolf Georg BEUTEL1 and Stanislaw Adam SLIPIÑSKI2 'Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany; e-mail:[email protected] 2Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, ul. Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa, Poland, e-mail:[email protected] Key words.Cucujoidea, Sphindidae, Protocucujidae, larvae, morphology, phylogeny Abstract. Selected representatives of Cucujoidea, Cleroidea, Tenebrionoidea, Chrysomelidae, and Lymexylidae were examined. External and internal head structures of larvae ofSphindus americanus and Ericmodes spp. are described in detail. The data were analyzed cladistically. A sister group relationship between Sphindidae and Protocucujidae is suggested by the vertical position of the labrum. The monophyly of Cucujiformia is supported by the reduced dorsal and anterior tentorial arms, fusion of galea and lacinia, and the presence of tube-like salivary glands. Absence of M. tentoriopraementalis inferior and presence of a short prepharyngeal tube are potential synapomorphies of Cleroidea, Cucujoidea and Tenebrionoidea. The monophyly of Cleroidea and Cucujoidea is suggested by the unusual attachment of the M. tentoriostipitalis to the ventral side of the posterior hypopharynx. Cucujoidea are paraphyletic. The families Endomychidae, Coccinellidae and Nitidulidae are more closely related to the monophyletic Cleroidea, than to other cucujoid groups. Separation of the posterior tentorial arms from the tentorial bridge and presence of a maxillolabial complex are synapomorphic features of Cleroidea and these cucujoid families. For a reliable reconstruction of cucujoid interrelation­ ships, further characters and taxa need to be studied. INTRODUCTION for a reconstruction of the phylogeny of the cucujoid, Sphindidae and Protocucujidae are two small families tenebrionoid and cleroid families.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Handsome Fungus Beetle (Coleoptera: Endomychidae: Lycoperdininae, Epopocinae) Records for Oklahoma Chris T
    C.T. McAllister and S.W. Chordas, III 77 Two New Handsome Fungus Beetle (Coleoptera: Endomychidae: Lycoperdininae, Epopocinae) Records for Oklahoma Chris T. McAllister Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745 Stephen W. Chordas, III Center for Life Sciences Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 Insects belonging to the order Coleoptera htm). These beetles are relatively small to include more described species (> 400,000) than moderately sized, mostly reddish-brown in any other group of organism on Earth. As such, color and usually with contrasting markings they make up 40% of all insect species described on the pronotum and/or elytra. The subfamily to date, which is also about 25% of all animals Lycoperdininae constitutes the largest subfamily (McHugh and Liebherr 2009). of Endomychidae, containing 38 genera and over 635 described species (Tomaszewska 2005). The handsome fungus beetles of the family Endomychidae currently includes During July and September 2020, two beetles approximately 130 genera and 1,782 species were collected below a night light at a residence and subspecies arranged among 12 subfamilies in Hochatown, McCurtain County. They with the highest diversity in tropical and were transferred to individual vials containing subtropical areas of Africa, Asia and the 70% (v/v) ethanol. Voucher specimens were Americas (Shockley et al. 2009a, b). In terms deposited in the C. A. Triplehorn Collection at of diversity in Oklahoma, there are 10 genera The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. and 12 species in the family (http://entoweb. Dorsal habitus images of each species (Figs. okstate.edu/museum/coleoptera/Endomychidae.
    [Show full text]
  • From Tethyan-Influenced Cretaceous Ambers
    Geoscience Frontiers 7 (2016) 695e706 HOSTED BY Contents lists available at ScienceDirect China University of Geosciences (Beijing) Geoscience Frontiers journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gsf Research paper Evolutionary and paleobiological implications of Coleoptera (Insecta) from Tethyan-influenced Cretaceous ambers David Peris a,*, Enrico Ruzzier b, Vincent Perrichot c, Xavier Delclòs a a Departament de Dinàmica de la Terra i de l’Oceà and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Facultat de Geologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franques s/n, 08071 Barcelona, Spain b Department of Life Science, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Rd, SW7 5BD London, UK c UMR CNRS 6118 Géosciences & OSUR, Université de Rennes 1, 35042 Rennes cedex, France article info abstract Article history: The intense study of coleopteran inclusions from Spanish (Albian in age) and French (AlbianeSantonian Received 23 September 2015 in age) Cretaceous ambers, both of Laurasian origin, has revealed that the majority of samples belong to Received in revised form the Polyphaga suborder and, in contrast to the case of the compression fossils, only one family of 25 December 2015 Archostemata, one of Adephaga, and no Myxophaga suborders are represented. A total of 30 families Accepted 30 December 2015 from Spain and 16 families from France have been identified (with almost twice bioinclusions identified Available online 16 January 2016 in Spain than in France); 13 of these families have their most ancient representatives within these ambers. A similar study had previously only been performed on Lebanese ambers (Barremian in age and Keywords: Beetle Gondwanan in origin), recording 36 coleopteran families. Few lists of taxa were available for Myanmar Fossil (Burmese) amber (early Cenomanian in age and Laurasian in origin).
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomina Insecta Nearctica Table of Contents
    5 NOMINA INSECTA NEARCTICA TABLE OF CONTENTS Generic Index: Dermaptera -------------------------------- 73 Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Species Index: Dermaptera --------------------------------- 74 Structure of the Check List --------------------------------- 11 Diplura ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 77 Original Orthography ---------------------------------------- 13 Classification: Diplura --------------------------------------- 79 Species and Genus Group Name Indices ----------------- 13 Alternative Family Names: Diplura ----------------------- 80 Structure of the database ------------------------------------ 14 Statistics: Diplura -------------------------------------------- 80 Ending Date of the List -------------------------------------- 14 Anajapygidae ------------------------------------------------- 80 Methodology and Quality Control ------------------------ 14 Campodeidae -------------------------------------------------- 80 Classification of the Insecta -------------------------------- 16 Japygidae ------------------------------------------------------ 81 Anoplura -------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 Parajapygidae ------------------------------------------------- 81 Classification: Anoplura ------------------------------------ 21 Procampodeidae ---------------------------------------------- 82 Alternative Family Names: Anoplura --------------------- 22 Generic Index: Diplura --------------------------------------
    [Show full text]