Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Appendix 1 to Report DPP11/2009

East Hampshire District Council

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

July 2009

1 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

2 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Contents

1. Introduction

2. The role of the SHLAA

3. Background and approach

4. Methodology

a. Stage 1: Planning the assessment

b. Stage 2: Sources of sites

c. Stage 3: Desktop review of existing information

d. Stage 4: Determining which sites and areas will be surveyed

e. Stage 5: Carrying out the survey

f. Stage 6: Estimating housing potential of each site

g. Stage 7: Assessing when and whether sites are likely to be developed

h. Stage 8: Review the assessment (including stage 9 and 10)

5. Study findings

6. Monitoring and review

7. Conclusions drawn from the SHLAA process

8. Appendices

3 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

4 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

East Hampshire Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2009.

1. Introduction

National planning policy (PPS3) states that all Local Planning Authorities should undertake a Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA). The SHLAA is seen by Government as a key tool in the development of local housing policy, and in demonstrating a 5 year supply of deliverable housing sites.

The SHLAA has the following objectives:

• To inform the Council’s strategy for the provision of housing to meet the South East Plan housing target for the district through its Core Strategy Development Plan Document. • To identify potential sites for new housing development and assess their suitability, availability and deliverability. • To inform the subsequent allocation of sites for housing in the Local Development Framework. • To inform the plan, monitor and manage approach for the provision of housing land and the Council’s assessment of five year supply of deliverable sites as required by PPS3.

The SHLAA forms part of the background evidence for the Local Development Framework (LDF). It identifies potential housing sites within the district which can be used through the Core Strategy and the Site Allocations Development Plan Documents (DPD) to meet any shortfalls in fulfilling the housing targets set out in the South East Plan.

This is the first SHLAA to be carried out by East Hampshire District Council.

2. The role of the SHLAA

The SHLAA contributes towards the evidence base of the LDF. Policy decisions will be made in the appropriate DPD, not in the SHLAA. In addition, the SHLAA does not make any formal planning decisions and therefore cannot be used for development control purposes.

The identification of potential housing sites, buildings or areas in the SHLAA does not state or imply that the District Council would necessarily grant planning permission for residential development. Nor does identification in the SHLAA automatically qualify the site for allocation through the Site Allocations DPD for residential or any other type of development.

5 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Planning applications will continue to be treated on their own merits at the time of the planning application and not on the information contained in the SHLAA. The SHLAA does not prevent planning applications being submitted on any sites identified in or excluded from the report at any time.

The supply of SHLAA sites will show the choices available to meet the need and demand for housing within the district. This will provide a basis for future decision making which determines the location of housing within the district.

Overall, sites identified in this report and its appendices have no additional planning status and inclusion in the SHLAA does not imply a presumption of planning approval for residential development on any site.

3. Background and approach

The need to conduct a SHLAA was first stated in PPS3 (November 2006). Detailed guidance has been published by the Department for Communities and Local Government, in the form of ‘Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessments, Practice Guidance 2007’. This guidance sets out the process which East Hampshire District Council has followed in the preparation of the SHLAA. The SHLAA is a systematic study of land in the District which is likely to be available for housing development in the period up to 2026.

The guidance highlights the importance of partnership working. This approach involves working with key stakeholders such as developers, landowners, town and parish councils, and other agencies. These stakeholders can provide expertise on the deliverability of sites, as well as advice on issues of site suitability.

The 2008 SHLAA had a cut off point of November 2008 for receipt of sites. The date was due to the need to publish the report at a point that didn’t hold up the Core Strategy and the wider LDF process.

4. Methodology

The methods used in East Hampshire District Council’s SHLAA are based on the guidance: Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessments, Practice Guidance July 2007 published by DCLG, with some minor alterations to reflect local circumstances. The diagram below comes directly from this guidance, and sets out the stages in the process.

6 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

a. Stage 1: Planning the assessment

The SHLAA was undertaken by officers of East Hampshire District Council as an in-house study. Officers from various sections of the District Council have been involved in the decisions made, and the production of the report. These included officers from Planning Policy, Development Control and the Heritage Team.

7 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Despite initial intentions to carry out the SHLAA as a piece of joint work with Winchester City Council the timing of the two respective LDF’s meant this was not possible. However, early work on preparing the methodology and an initial stakeholder meeting was held in conjunction with Winchester City Council. The stakeholder group included representatives of other local authorities, housing developers and agents, housing associations and other bodies. A subsequent meeting of the group was held in July 2009 to discuss the draft outcomes of the study.

A work programme, including key milestones for the project was prepared. Resources in terms of staff input were included in the programme. This, with subsequent amendments throughout the process, formed the basis of the project.

A site of 5 or more units is set as the survey threshold. This is likely to identify as many sites as possible, without the problem of attempting to assess very small sites where it is impossible to assess delivery.

The guidance states that the study should aim to identify as many sites in and around as many settlements as possible. However, planning policy guides development toward the more sustainable settlements. This emphasis is taken on board in the SHLAA to ensure that housing is developed in the larger settlements which have a range of services and infrastructure. b. Stage 2: Sources of sites.

The housing sites are from a number of different sources; existing local plan allocations (baseline and reserve), outstanding planning permissions, lapsed residential planning permissions, refused planning permission but development acceptable in principle, urban capacity study sites, National Land Use Database sites, vacant and derelict land, surplus public sector land, redevelopment of existing residential areas, preliminary enquiries, sites put forward by landowners/developers, aerial surveys, non residential land and rural exception sites. c. Stage 3: Desktop review of existing information

An evaluation of the above sources of sites was carried out by officers in order to determine all sites which would be included in the assessment.

A survey of the GIS database was conducted for all the sites. This looked at the criteria referred to in the ‘Recording site characteristics’ stage 5 of the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) guidance on SHLAA’s. From the information gathered through the site survey an initial review of sites was undertaken.

8 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

During stage 3 an attempt was made to contact the owners of all the sites that came from the Urban Capacity Study, baseline, reserve and all other non landowner submitted sources. Where this was achieved and the landowner was interested in development these sites were taken forward in the SHLAA process.

All sites identified were mapped on GIS and included within an Access database. The GIS mapping information was made available on the Council’s website, together with a pro-forma for landowners and agents which could be completed on line in order to submit additional sites. d. Stage 4: Determining which sites and areas will be surveyed.

DCLG Strategic Housing land Availability Assessments - Practice Guidance (Para. 21) states:

“Particular types of land or areas may be excluded from the Assessment Except for more clear-cut designations such as sites Sites of Special Scientific Interest, the scope of the Assessment should not be narrowed down by existing policies designed to constrain development, so that local planning authority is in the best possible position when it comes to decide its strategy for delivering its housing objectives.”

The Planning Advisory Service document – Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment and Development Plan Document preparation (Page 7) states:

“There is no expectation that every possible Greenfield site should be assessed within the SHLAA. Indeed in many rural areas there will be large numbers of theoretically-possible sites, many of which are patently unsuitable for housing because of their isolation from settlements or for other reasons.”

In view of the Guidance at Stage 2 an initial broad evaluation of sites was made to exclude those which were unsuitable for development and which were not worthy of being included in the survey.

The following criteria were used to exclude sites as having no realistic potential for housing development:-

• The site lies within a nationally or internationally designated site: Special Protection Area, Special Areas of Conservation, Sites of Special Scientific Interest or National Nature Reserves.

• On the site of a Scheduled Ancient Monument

• Greenfield sites which are unrelated to an existing settlement, either with or without a settlement policy boundary.

9 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

This initial site sift removed a number of sites. The remainder of the sites which had not been removed through this sifting process were then subject to a site survey. e. Stage 5: Carrying out the survey.

Between December 2008 and February 2009 all the SHLAA sites were visited where access could be gained, excepting those excluded from the initial site sift in stage 4 (see Appendix 1. Site Survey Form).

The survey team consisted of officers from the Planning Policy and Development Control sections. Maps and site details gathered through the desktop survey were consulted during the survey to ensure accuracy of information given.

The survey identified further information in regard to site suitability, in line with stage 5 of the DCLG guidance on SHLAA’s. The information from the GIS and Site Surveys was then sifted on the basis of suitability.

Within the SHLAA site sifting process questions/statements were devised which aimed to determine any issues raised in respect of suitability, and information raised in respect of availability and achievability. The Information gathered helped to inform, in conjunction with other information gathered, the stage 7 site assessment. (see site appraisal form, Appendix 2) f. Stage 6: Estimating the housing potential of each site

In order to determine the potential housing supply of sites a phasing table was enclosed with the letter that went out to developers. Developers were asked for information on the total number of dwellings that could be built on their site. However, this information was not always available. In those cases where the information had not been provided the following densities were used in order to determine potential housing numbers.

SHLAA suggested densities

50dph – within or adjacent to the town or local centres of Alton, Petersfield, Horndean, Liphook, and Whitehill/Bordon.

40dph – within the existing settlement policy boundaries and on greenfield sites adjacent to Market Towns, Large Local Service Centres and Small Local Service Centres (Alton, Petersfield, Horndean, Liphook, Whitehill/Bordon, Clanfield, Four Marks/South Medstead, Grayshott, Liss, Rowlands Castle )

30dph - within all other settlements with a settlement policy boundary and on greenfield sites adjacent to these settlements, in settlements without a

10 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

settlement policy boundary and in areas of special characteristics in the settlements listed above (in 40 dph).

Appendix 3 sets out the methodology used to reach the housing density figures. g. Stage 7: Assessing when and whether sites are likely to be developed

The guidance seeks to consider all sites as one of three categories:

• Deliverable – available now and with a reasonable prospect of development within 5 years from the date of adoption of the Plan (2011). These sites are considered to have housing potential and are identified in this study as being provided within the period up to 2016; and

• Developable – sites suitable for housing and having a reasonable prospect of being delivered within the period of the plan. These sites are included within this study and identified to come forward in a time frame up to 2026;

• Not currently developable – these are the identified sites which, for whatever reason, cannot currently come forward for housing. These are included within the rejected sites.

Assessing suitability of sites

The information necessary to conduct an assessment of site suitability was gathered through the desktop survey and a site visit.

Using the information gathered through the GIS and site survey’s, an initial site sift was carried out. The purpose of this sift was to exclude any sites which were identified as being unsuitable for progression within the SHLAA.

This was done by a number of planning policy officers, in conjunction with officers from the Heritage and Development Control sections.

Through the sifting process a number of sites were identified as having constraints which did not exclude them from the SHLAA, but for which extra information would be needed in order to further investigate their suitability. Where this was the case, issues were highlighted in the sifting form. Landowners / developers were then sent a form and asked to provide the extra information. The form highlighted the issues that would have to be clarified in order to make a final decision regarding suitability. The tables used in this sifting process can be seen at Appendix 4.

11 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Assessing availability and achievability of sites

Many of the sites considered during the assessment were promoted by landowners or developers in response to an advertisement which aimed to ascertain which sites were available for development.

In these cases the landowner or developer was identifiable and their intentions are made clear. Where sites originated from other sources attempts were made to identify landowners from Council records. However this was not always successful and within the constraints of this study it has not always been possible to identify and or contact landowners. In these instances a view has been taken as to the likelihood that developers will come forward based on knowledge of the site.

The form which was sent to developers requesting further information regarding suitability (see above), included questions related to availability and achievability. A phasing table was also included, in order to gauge the spread of housing over the remaining years of the South East Plan period.

Final sifting process

A final site sift was carried out based on all information held, including the information provided by landowners/developers in response to the sifting form sent to them.

Where information had not been provided the SHLAA sites were considered, with respect to suitability, on the information already held. However, with respect to availability and achievability the sites were considered to be currently unavailable. These sites will be put into the next SHLAA update with the developers / land owners being contacted again when the updates are carried out.

On a number of sites the potential for development was limited by a range of constraints. In some instances these constraints may be overcome through either shifts in policy or by creation or improvement of infrastructure. The likelihood of changes occurring has been considered in order to assess whether a site is developable or not.

In certain cases constraints were considered to continue to apply. Land in employment use was excluded on the basis that although the Assessment of Employment Needs and Floorspace Requirements study included an appraisal of sites, it was not considered detailed enough to justify the loss of individual employment sites at this stage. Sites located in gaps, were not excluded unless other constraints applied (flooding etc) until a review of gap boundaries has been undertaken through the relevant DPD.

12 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Sequential testing of SHLAA sites: The sites that form the SHLAA database are not being sequentially tested within the SHLAA. This is because; housing sites are subject to change, additional housing sites will come forward and government policy may change. This makes a sequential test of sites in the SHLAA an inefficient and largely inaccurate method by which to decide which sites are most suitable for housing. The sequential testing of the sites will take place within the site allocations DPD and its updates. This will be done as and when shortfalls in meeting the South East Plan targets are identified. By using this method of sequential testing, the most up-to-date SHLAA and policy information will be available to inform decisions made. This will also allow the sites that are sequentially tested to be drawn from an area which is most appropriate in spatial scale and location to meet housing needs at any given point. h. Stage 8: Review of the assessment (including stage 9 and 10)

Following the survey of sites and site sifting work a review of housing land supply has been carried out as set out in section 5 of the SHLAA. The assessment of housing land supply indicates there is no requirement to assess the housing potential of broad locations, due to sufficient supply being identified through previously allocated sites, and there being sufficient sites identified through the earlier stages of the SHLAA. It also sets out the justification for including an element of housing potential from windfall sites.

5. Study Findings

District Housing Requirement Figures

The housing figures for East Hampshire District Council as set out in policy H1 of the South East Plan is 5200 dwellings for the total 20 year period between 2006 and 2026, an average of 260 per annum. The 5200 dwellings are split between the South Hampshire Sub Region, and the rest of the district (termed here Central Hampshire).

Policy SH5 of the South East Plan sets out that the part of the district which falls within the South Hampshire sub region will take 1200 new dwellings between 2006 and 2026, an average of 60 per annum. The border of the South Hampshire sub region follows the southern boundary of the proposed national park and includes most of the land within the parishes of Clanfield, Horndean and Rowland’s Castle.

The remainder of the district (Central Hampshire) which falls outside of the South Hampshire sub region will take the remaining 4000 of the 5200 new dwellings between 2006 and 2026, an average of 200 per year.

Whitehill/Bordon Opportunity.

13 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Policy AOSR3 of the South East Plan sets an indicative net housing figure of 5,500 dwellings for the Whitehill/Bordon Strategic Development Area. This figure is ring fenced and does not count towards East Hampshire District Council’s housing figure as is set out in policy H1 of the South East Plan. The figure of 5,500 houses for Whitehill/Bordon is liable to change subject to constraints and opportunities that arise as part of the ongoing work at Whitehill/Bordon.

Housing supply

Housing provision and supply for the period 2006 to 2026 is made up of a number of sources, including existing completions, housing commitments from sites with planning permission and reserve sites. a. sites within the planning process

Housing completions

Table 1 shows the number of dwellings built from 1 st April 2006. Figures are for completions net of losses for each year between 1 st April to 31 st March.

Table 1: Annual completions since 1/4/2006

Year Central South District Hampshire Hampshire 2006/07 246 34 280 2007/08 462 84 546 2008/09 543 37 580 Total 1251 155 1406

Housing commitments

Table 2 shows the number of sites which can come forward from both large (10 dwellings or more) and small sites with planning permission at 31 March 2009.

Table 2: Commitments

Area Large Small Total South Hampshire 28 86 114 Central 1276* 468 1744 Hampshire District 1304 554 1858

14 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

*The housing numbers include the baseline housing site from the Local Plan which has not got planning permission (Former Lord Mayor Treloar Hospital site, Alton - 150 dwellings).

PPS3 indicates that in order for sites to be deliverable they should be available, suitable and achievable. The large sites have been assessed, the views of the Council’s Planning Development section have been sought and, together with the results of a postal survey of large housing sites, a phasing schedule has been drawn up (see Appendix 5). This schedule is for large sites at 31 March 2008.

An assessment of the availability of small sites with planning permission is more difficult to undertake in view of the large number of sites and the different aspirations of landowners. It is reasonable to assume that those sites that do not come forward for development will be compensated for by new sites granted planning permission and developed over the five year period. For the most part, the small site developments represent ‘windfall’ sites coming forward and using previously developed land within settlement policy boundaries. The granting of planning permissions for these sites has been in the light of the adopted planning policies with their emphasis on sustainability.

Reserve sites

The adopted Local Plan includes a number of ‘reserve’ housing sites under Policy H2. These sites were originally identified to be released, had annual monitoring by the County Council demonstrated a County-wide shortfall of housing provision.

The Government’s guidance set out in Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing requires local planning authorities to identify and maintain a rolling five-year supply of deliverable land for housing. For East Hampshire the amount of housing is based on the provisions of the South East Plan.

Monitoring by the Council showed that there was a shortfall in housing supply within that part of East Hampshire in South Hampshire. In line with the Government’s guidance, additional housing sites needed to be identified and brought forward for development within this area.

The Council resolved, therefore, to bring forward as a matter of some urgency the ‘reserve’ housing sites within the South Hampshire part of the District and as allocated in the East Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review (2006).

Planning permission was recently granted on appeal for 116 dwellings at the reserve housing site at Silent Garden, The Firs, Liphook. The site is also identified in Policy H2 of the Local Plan. The policy states that the timing of and the need to release the reserve sites will be determined by the County and District Councils in the light of monitoring and Regional Planning Guidance. However, the Inspector concluded that the decision on whether to grant

15 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

permission for the proposal should take greater account of PPS3 than the development plan.

The Inspector regarded the appeal site as a suitable and deliverable source of housing land. He added that the site should be regarded just as much a part of the identified housing land supply as the baseline sites.

The Inspector turned to the advice in PPS3. This states that even if there is an up to date 5 year supply of deliverable sites and applications come forward for sites that are allocated in the overall land supply, but not in the 5 year supply, then consideration needs to be given to whether granting permission would undermine the achievement of policy objectives. The Inspector also made the point that applications should not be refused on the grounds of prematurity but determined on their particular merits.

The Council has therefore decided to prepare development briefs for the Local Plan reserve housing sites as they are considered to be a part of the identified supply of land for housing. Applications for the development of the sites will be treated on their merits. The Council has assessed the sites for suitability, availability and achievability as part of the SHLAA.

Table 3: Housing Yield from Local Plan Reserve Sites (not in ranking order).

Reserve site Total 2009 – 2011 - 2016 – 2021 - yield 2011 2016 2021 2026 South Hampshire Land at Green Lane, 275 80 195 Clanfield. Havant Road, 220 40 180 Horndean.* Redhill Road, 47 47 Oaklands House, Rowland’s Castle. North of James 85 85 Copse Close, Horndean. Total** 627 167 460

Central Hampshire North of Brislands 90 90 Lane, Four Marks. Land at Inwood 25 25 Road, Liss. Land at Larcombe 100 100 Road, Petersfield. Land at Penns Field, 90 90

16 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Petersfield. South East of the 100 50 50 Causeway, Petersfield. Causeway Farm, 275 100 175 Petersfield. Lowsley Farm, 155 55 100 Liphook. Total 835 510 325

District Totals 1462 167 970 325

* Includes the Keydell Nursery site. ** The housing numbers for the reserve site, Land west of the Church Centre, Silent Garden, Liphook are included as a housing commitment under Table 2.

The design of the format of the stage 7 assessment was done in order to assess questions relating to the deliverability and developability of the sites. b.Sites not currently in the planning process

Windfall allowance

Through PPS3 it is made clear that housing should come forward on identified sites, and that allowances for windfalls should not be allowed for the first 10 years of the Land supply from the date of the relevant LDD adoption, unless there are exceptional circumstances where LPA’s can provide robust evidence of genuine local circumstances that prevent specific sites being identified.

The Core Strategy is anticipated to be adopted in2011. East Hampshire District Council has therefore included a windfall allowance between the years 2021 and 2026. The windfall allowance for these years is based upon the net number of dwellings permitted on small windfall sites between 2001 and 2008.

For the South Hampshire Area the total number of small site completions was 122 or 17.5 per year. For the Central Hampshire area the figure was 953 or 135.5 per year, with the district wide total being 1073 or 153 per year.

The government ‘practice guidance’ note advises that there are three factors which should be taken into account in reaching an informed view of the contribution of unidentified sites:

• ‘Whether the annual rate is likely to increase or decrease’.

• ‘Whether the pattern of redevelopment is likely to remain the same, grow or decline.’

17 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

• Whether market conditions are likely to stay the same, worsen or improve in the future.’

The character of East Hampshire District is not such that the demand for housing is likely to suddenly dry up. The attractive quality of the district, combined with its location in the South East region between London and the South Coast, will maintain a high and continuous demand for housing. However the nation as a whole is in a recession which will result in a slower rate of housing growth over the next few years, so some caution in regard to housing development is likely to be expected.

A conservative windfall allowance of 10 dwellings per year has been given for South Hampshire. This figure is proportionally significantly smaller than the average of 17, However, the small total numbers result in vulnerability to fluctuation, and the figure decided upon reflects this.

For Central Hampshire a windfall allowance of 100 dwellings per years has been given, although not significantly lower than the average, it is considered conservative as there has been a steady growth in the number of small site completions in this area over the period 2001 to 2008. The windfall allowance is for the years 2021 to 2026, and will not be affected by the current recession.

Diagram showing trends for small site completions 2001 – 2009.

Small site housing completions

250.00

200.00

150.00

Southern Central District Wide

100.00

50.00

0.00 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09

18 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Table 4 shows the windfall allowance calculated for the period between 2021 and 2026:

Table 4: Windfall Allowance 2021 – 2026

Small site windfall Total small site windfall allowance per annum. allowance between 2021 and 2026. District wide 110 550 South Hampshire 10 50 Central Hampshire 100 500

In addition what is likely to happen is that the annual windfall rates shown above will also occur for the 13 year period between 2009 and 2021 though at a slightly lower rate for the next few years due to the current economic downturn.

Conservative estimates for the number of dwellings coming forward in this period would therefore be around 120 for the South Hampshire Area, and 1200 for the rest of the district. Giving a total of 1320 anticipated new dwellings which cannot be counted towards the Council’s housing land supply due to the approach set out in PPS3, although some of these dwellings will arise from the current stock of unimplemented permissions. It is noted that subsequently the completions from this windfall source can be counted after they have been completed. However in order to comply with PPS3 and so as not to risk the evidence base being found ‘unsound’, this study is not making a windfall allowance for the first 10 years of land supply after the anticipated adoption date of the Core Strategy.

Sites within settlement policy boundaries

The SHLAA has identified a number of sites within settlement policy boundaries. In principle the redevelopment of such sites would be appropriate, although in the case of existing employment sites the Council has not included these in the list of SHLAA sites due to the reasons given in ‘Stage 7’ above.

Table 5: Potential sites within settlement policy boundaries

2011 - 2016 2016- 2021 2021- 2026 Total South 64 33 0 97 Hampshire Central 296 209 0 505 Hampshire District 330 272 0 602 Wide

The full list of sites inside the Settlement Policy can be found in Appendix 6 of this report.

19 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Sites outside settlement policy boundaries

A large number of sites were submitted which lie outside a settlement policy boundary. The vast majority of these sites were greenfield. Those which were not excluded through the Stage 7 site sift have been included within a SHLAA database which will form a potential land supply.

Table 6: Potential Housing Numbers from SHLAA sites outside settlement policy boundaries .

Area/period 2009 - 2011 - 2016 - 2021 - Total 2011 2016 2021 2026 District 2305 3415 1850 0 7570 South 662 1187 694 0 2543 Hampshire Central 1643 2228 1156 0 5027 Hampshire

The expected phasing of housing coming forward from the above SHLAA sites is based upon the phasing information given to East Hampshire District Council by Landowners and developers and from information provided by Planning Control Officers. Where this was not available, it was based upon the number of houses which it is considered could feasibly be built over the 5 year periods. A full list of included SHLAA sites falling outside the SPB can be found in appendix 7.

Summary of housing supply

The following tables show the housing supply for 5 year periods for the District between 2006 and 2026. As well as a District wide table there are separate tables for the section of the District which falls into the South Hampshire sub region, and the rest of the District that falls into the ‘Central Hampshire’ area. These tables show the sources of land supply for housing within the District, as well as whether there is sufficient housing potential from the SHLAA site to meet any shortfalls in meeting the targets set out in the South East Plan.

Table 7: District wide housing supply.

East Hampshire Area Housing Figures. Source of 2006 2009 - 2011 - 2016 2021 – 2009 - 2006 - housing potential – 2011 2016 – 2026 2026 2026 2009 2021 South East Plan 780 520 1300 1300 1300 4420 5200 Target annualised

20 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Completions 1406 1406 (table 1) Commitments 593 1265 1858 1858 (table 2) Reserve sites 167 970 325 1462 1462 (table 3) Windfall. (table 4) 550 550 550 SHLAA sites - 0 330 272 0 602 602 within SPB’s (table 5) Total 1406 760 2565 597 550 4363 5878 Shortfall / surplus +626 +240 +1265 -703 -750 -37 +678 SHLAA sites 2305 3466 1905 0 7679 7679 outside SPB’s (table 6)

Table 8: Central area housing supply

East Hampshire Area Housing Figures. Source of 2006 2009 - 2011 - 2016 2021 – 2009 - 2006 - housing potential – 2011 2016 – 2026 2026 2026 2009 2021 South East Plan 600 400 1000 1000 1000 3400 4000 Target annualised Completions 1251 1251 (table 1) Commitments 560 1184 1744 1744 (table 2) Reserve sites 510 325 835 835 (table 3) Windfall. (table 4) 500 500 500 SHLAA sites 0 296 209 0 505 505 within SPB’s (table 5) Total 1251 560 1990 534 500 3488 4835 Shortfall / surplus +651 +160 +990 -466 -500 +88 +835 SHLAA sites 1643 2289 1201 0 5119 5119 outside SPB’s (table 6)

Table 9: South Hampshire Area housing supply

East Hampshire Area Housing Figures. Source of 2006 2009 - 2011 - 2016 2021 – 2009 - 2006 - housing potential – 2011 2016 – 2026 2026 2026

21 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

2009 2021 South East Plan 180 120 300 300 300 1020 1200 Target annualised Completions 155 155 (table 1) Commitments 33 81 114 114 (table 2) Reserve sites 167 460 627 627 (table 3) Windfall. (table 4) 50 50 50 SHLAA sites - 64 33 0 97 97 within SPB’s (table 5) Total 155 200 605 33 50 888 1043 Shortfall / surplus -25 +800 +305 -267 -250 -132 -157 SHLAA sites 662 1187 694 0 2543 2543 outside SPB’s (table 6)

The above tables indicate that within the Central Hampshire part of the district there is sufficient housing supply identified to meet the housing target set out in the South East plan, for the 20 year plan period. The sites identified in the SHLAA will form a database of housing sites. If at any point in the future a shortfall in housing supply is identified through updates to five year supply and Site Allocations Documents then the SHLAA sites will be looked at for meeting the supply.

Although there are potential shortfalls in housing supply later in the plan period these are outweighed by initial oversupply in the earlier part of the plan.

In the South Hampshire part of the District there is sufficient housing to meet the 5 year supply for market housing. However for the 20 year supply there is a 157 dwelling shortfall over the plan period. There are sufficient SHLAA sites to meet this shortfall, and sites will be allocated through the Site Allocations DPD.

6. Monitoring and review

Potential shortfalls in meeting the housing targets will be identified through the ongoing Annual Monitoring Report process, and updates to the work on 5 year land supply. The SHLAA will be updated at the same time as the AMR.

The SHLAA updates will be published annually as an appendage to the Annual Monitoring Report (AMR), with the first update being tied in with the 2009/2010 AMR. The annual cut off point for the receipt of new SHLAA sites will be inline with that for the rest of the data used in the AMR and with the financial year. This

22 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

is the 31 st of March each year with the cut off for the first SHLAA update being the 31 st of March 2010.

7. Conclusions drawn from the SHLAA process

The SHLAA has assessed all sources of identifiable supply within the District, made a suitably modest allowance for continuing windfall development from small sites, outside the ten year period from the adoption of the Core Strategy, and looked at the potential contribution from the large number of greenfield sites adjacent to settlements.

As those familiar with the housing market will appreciate, any analysis of the housing market reflects the situation at any given point in time. The market will undoubtedly vary over the period considered by this study. The annual reviews of the SHLAA will pick up changing trends in the marketplace.

Whilst the short term demand for housing has fallen, the long term demand is still considered by the market to be strong. This is underpinned by government policy to deliver a much increased level of housing to meet the medium term shortage. The housing market in the East Hampshire area will continue to be comparatively strong, with asking prices for most house types remaining high.

It is considered that, due to the historically strong land values in the area, it is unlikely that any competing uses or abnormal development costs would adversely affect the economic viability for housing of any of the identified sites.

The above tables indicate that within the Central Hampshire part of the district there is sufficient housing supply identified to meet the housing target set out in the South East plan, for the 20 year plan period. The sites identified in the SHLAA will form a database of housing sites. If at any point in the future a shortfall in housing supply is identified through updates to five year supply and site allocations documents then the SHLAA sites will be looked at for meeting the supply.

Although there are potential shortfalls in housing supply later in the plan period these are outweighed by initial oversupply in the earlier part of the plan.

23 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

24 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

8. Appendices

25 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Appendix 1.

Site Survey Form GENERAL

Settlement / closest Settlement. (Including settlement hierarchy score)

Site address

Site area (Ha)

Likely area suitable for housing

Location of site Within/adjacent/outside settlement policy boundary

Current use of site/Proportion PDL

Site and surrounding/adjacent uses

Planning history of site including: • planning application number(s) • refusal/permission • description of proposed development • local plan history • Inspector’s comments/recommendation

26 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

POSSIBLE CONSTRAINTS

Desktop Study

Within AONB/proposed National Park

Within Strategic/local gaps

Ecological designation e.g. SSSI, SAC, SPA (within 5km), LNR, NNR, SINC

Open space (type)

Listed building(s)/ Conservation area (including name)

TPO

Scheduled Ancient Monuments other archaeological sites.

Distance to public transport • walking distance to nearest bus route, frequency of bus service. • distance to railway station

Walking distance to nearest settlement in hierarchy And distance to primary school.

Contamination. inc landfill

Flood risk - SFRA zones 1, 2 and 3. ground water protection zone (category 1,2 and 3)

27 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Waste water (southern Area), oil/gas pipelines

Known infrastructural requirements

Other constraints

COMMENTS:

28 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Site Visit

Water courses

Power lines/pylons etc.

Access and highways constraints

Including: • roads • public footpaths • bridleways

Natural features including: • steep slopes • tree cover • views

Existing built features

Potential amenity issues

Including: impact of development on existing local residents.

Other constraints and opportunities including: • redevelopment • environmental improvements

29 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Appendix 2. Site constraint form.

Site reference number; Site Address; 1. Factors Not a constraint to Constraint which needs Constraint which housing development. assurance of ability for prevents housing mitigation or extra cost development. to be met by the person or organisation that submitted the site. Relation to settlement policy boundary. Score of settlement in settlement hierarchy. Site planning history Current site uses for sites within the planning process Current use for sites outside the planning process Infrastructure requirements - water supply, drainage, power Distance to services Distance to public transport. Proposed National Park AONB TPO’s Strategic/Local Gaps

Open space

Listed Buildings/Conservati on Areas. Historic Buildings/ Archaeological sites

Contamination/ pollution, Including Landfill. Flood risk

Ground water protection zones

30 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Water courses

Aquifers Biodiversity designations. Cables, pylons, electricity lines, oil gas water pipelines. Access and highways, including public footpaths. Potential amenity Issues Natural features. Landscape. Stephen D’este Hoare comment. Existing built features.

Other constraints 2. For an accurate decision to be made regarding the further inclusion/ exclusion of sites within the SHLAA it is necessary that one box from each of the rows below is filled out. Where EHDC has highlighted an issue please comment on this. Availability Issues Ownership Issues?

Who is promoting the site? Achievability Issues Market factors?

What are the adjacent uses/ the attractiveness of the site for housing? Viability of proposed use? Cost Factors

Site preparation costs? Is your development still viable when ‘planning cost’? are accounted for? Delivery Factors

Are there single/multiple developers?

31 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Appendix 3. Housing density

Background

In order to ascertain the housing potential of each site a housing density multiplier has been applied dependant on the characteristics of the site.

Practice Guidance

The DCLG Strategic Housing land Availability Assessments - Practice Guidance (paragraph 30) states:

“The estimation of the housing potential of each identified site should be guided by the existing or emerging plan policy, particularly the approach to housing densities at the local level. Where the plan policy is out-of-date or doesn’t provide a sufficient basis to make a local judgement, one approach to estimating potential is by sketching a scheme from scratch, or by using relevant existing schemes as the basis for an outline scheme, adjusted for any individual site characteristics and physical constraints.”

Existing Policy

Policy H5 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review states that planning permission will not be granted for residential development within a settlement policy boundary for schemes of less than 30dph and schemes of 30- 50dph or more in the case of sites close to local facilities and/or a good public transport service.

PPS3: Housing suggests that LPA’s might wish to set out a range of densities across a plan area rather than one broad density range. 30 dph net should be used as a national indicative minimum until local density policies are in place (para 47).

The Council’s Urban Capacity Study (UCS) 2002 included density multipliers to establish the likely capacity of identified housing sites:

• 30dph in villages with settlement policy boundaries and those sites in towns with special characteristics; • 35 dph in towns and larger settlements with good access to services and facilities; • 45dph within 400m of a primary shopping area or supermarket; and • 60 dph in town centres or 400m of Alton and Petersfield railway stations/transport interchanges.

32 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Emerging Policy

Policy H5 of the South East Plan indicates that higher housing densities will be encouraged, with an overall regional target of 40 dph over the Plan period.

Comment

The use of a detailed range of densities may be too complicated for the initial stages of the SHLAA. It is to be noted that Winchester CC is using (simply) 40dph in Winchester Town and 30dph in other large settlements.

There is also considerable sensitivity with respect to achieving higher densities in East Hampshire’s urban areas. Density assessments which take account of local characteristics would therefore be more appropriate.

It would still be appropriate to have different densities for large urban areas close to facilities and to public transport, and for the smaller settlements and villages. The settlement analysis and emerging spatial strategy helps with this. As the SHLAA becomes more refined it will be appropriate to examine the densities and housing potential in greater detail on a site-by-site basis.

SHLAA suggested densities

50dph – within or adjacent to the town or local centres of Alton, Petersfield, Horndean, Liphook, and Whitehill/Bordon.

30dph - within all other settlements with a settlement policy boundary and on greenfield sites adjacent to these settlements, in settlements without a settlement policy boundary and in areas of special characteristics in the settlements listed above (in 40 dph).

Reasoning

In line with existing policy in the Local Plan: Second Review for no less than 30dph in settlement policy boundaries and schemes of 30-50dph or more in the case of sites close to local facilities and/or a good public transport service.

33 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

In line with emerging policy for a spatial strategy in the Core Strategy for a settlement hierarchy based upon the accessibility of settlements and availability of a broad range of facilities.

Service Centres

50dph – in addition to the criteria below (in 40dph) these sites are closer to facilities and have an urban character which would make higher densities appropriate.

40dph - the service centres have higher level facilities and services, including school(s), local employment and a range of shops.

Other Settlements

30dph - the smaller villages and other remaining settlements have fewer facilities and services, particularly key ones, and the characteristics of the settlements are such that higher densities would be inappropriate.

Areas of special character can be found in many settlements. In such areas higher densities of 40dph or more, as set out in service centres above, may be inappropriate.

34 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Appendix 4.

Landowner/developer constraints form

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) Stage 7 Assessment

In assessing the SHLAA sites the Council has identified issues or constraints which may have an impact on a sites suitability, achievability and availability for housing.

The table below sets out those issues identified for the site you have put forward. These may relate to matters of suitability, availability or achievability. The Council would welcome your comment on those issues raised in order to assist it in making a decision as to whether the site should be continued to be included in the SHLAA at this time.

The SHLAA will be updated on an annual basis. Therefore, if a SHLAA site is felt to have issues that cannot be resolved at this time, for whatever reason, further assessment of the site can be considered at a future SHLAA update.

In responding to the issues identified the Council would expect only a brief statement to be necessary to outline how a constraint or issue could be overcome or mitigated. Over 200 SHLAA sites have been put forward and the Council does not have the resources, or consider it necessary as part of the SHLAA process, to consider detailed consultants reports or enter into detailed discussions on individual sites.

If no comment is made to a specific issue raised, or no response made to this form within the given time frame, the Council will assess the suitability of the site for inclusion in the SHLAA on the basis of the information it has available.

A phasing table has also been included, in order to gauge the spread of housing over the remaining years of the South East Plan period.

Site Suitability, availability and achievability

Site reference number: Site address: Factor Issue/constraint Comment Suitability

35 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Availability

Achievability

Housing Phasing:

The pro forma that was sent out to ascertain potential sites for the SHLAA process included a site phasing table. This new phasing table has been included in order to determine the possible affects of the economic downturn which has taken hold since many of the initial site pro forma’s were received. The SHLAA is updated on a yearly basis so any changes in phasing that occur as time progresses will be able to be taken account of in the ongoing process. Please fill in the number of dwellings that you expect to be completed in any given financial year (1 st April to the 31 st March).

Year 2009/2010 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 Phasing Year 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 Phasing

For an electronic version of this form please email; [email protected]

36 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Appendix 5.

EAST HAMPSHIRE SCHEDULE OF LARGE HOUSING SITES

37 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

EAST HAMPSHIRE SCHEDULE OF LARGE HOUSING SITES: CENTRAL HAMPSHIRE (part) at 1 April 2008 Site Address Status Permitted Net Dwls 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2008/13 2013/14 Other Dwls Available Supply Herne Farm, Under 0059 Petersfield construction 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 9 0 West of the 35 built 6 not 0216A Square, started 6 6 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 Liphook Chase Road, Under 0238 Lindford construction 71 71 71 0 0 0 0 71 0 136 built Basing Home 22 built 1 under 0255 Farm, Privett construction 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lord Mayor Baseline 0256 Treloar Hosp. allocation, not 0 150 0 0 0 40 60 100 50 Alton started, no pp Chandos Baseline 0260 Lodge, Alton allocation, with 172 172 0 0 0 60 75 135 37 pp not started S of Winchester Baseline 0261 Rd. Four Marks allocation, 175 175 70 30 40 35 0 175 0 started Hogmoor Rd. Baseline 0263 Wh/Bordon allocation, with 46 46 0 -1 15 20 12 46 0 pp not started The Depot Baseline 0278# Holybourne allocation, with 32 38 24 8 0 0 0 32 0 6 pp not started St Mary’s Hall, Under 0286 Liss construction 12 12 12 0 0 0 0 12 0 Whitehill 0288# Chase, 8 dwellings built, 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Wh/Bordon rest not started

38 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Site Address Status Permitted Net Dwls 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2008/13 2013/14 Other Dwls Available Supply W of St Lucia 0301 Lodge, Under 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 Wh/Bordon Construction Silver Birch, Under 0305# Greatham construction 12 12 12 0 0 0 0 12 0 Sparkham’s Under 0306 Yard, W. Liss construction 23 23 23 0 0 0 0 23 0 Treloars Sch. 0309 U. Froyle Not started 26 26 0 0 10 16 0 26 0 98-102 0310# Longmoor Rd. Not started 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Liphook Rushes Rd. 0312 Petersfield Site cleared 13 13 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 Alton Day 0316# Services, Alton Not started 30 30 0 10 20 0 0 30 0 148-154 Winch 0318 Rd. Four Marks Not started 9 9 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 Smith’s Garage 0320 Liss Site cleared 13 13 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 Swan Court, Under 0322# Petersfield construction 13 13 13 0 0 0 0 13 0

N of Stn Rd. Baseline 0324# Petersfield allocation, no pp 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 King George’s Baseline alloc. 0325# Hosp. Liphook under 147 147 30 33 30 30 24 147 0 construction 7 Barnham Rd. Under 0329# Petersfield construction 12 12 12 0 0 0 0 12 0

39 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Site Address Status Permitted Net Dwls 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2008/13 2013/14 Other Dwls Available Supply 1-3 Butts Rd. 0332 Alton Not started 10 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 Adhurst St 0334 Mary. Not started 11 11 0 -1 0 12 0 11 0 Petersfield Vitelec Elec. Under 0335 Bordon construction 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 5 Charles St. Under 0336 Petersfield construction 11 11 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 25 Chawton Pk . 0337# Rd. Alton Not started 12 12 0 0 12 0 0 12 0 Borough Rd. Under 0338 Petersfield construction 108 108 78 30 0 0 0 108 0 42-54 Ashdell Under 0346 Rd. Alton construction 16 16 16 0 0 0 0 16 0 Vertigo Club, 0350 Petersfield Not started 13 13 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 93-97 Winch. Under 0351# Rd. Four Marks construction 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 6 Stn. Rd. 0352 Petersfield Not started 12 12 0 0 12 0 0 12 0 Thornybush 0353 Hse. Medstead Not started 14 14 0 -1 15 0 0 14 0 Liphook Under 0354# Service Stn. construction 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 51-53 0355 Normandy St. Not started 14 14 0 14 0 0 0 14 0 Alton N of Hale Close Under 0356 Ropley construction 12 12 12 0 0 0 0 12 0 Whitedown 0357# Sch. Alton Not started 25 25 0 10 15 0 0 25 0 Olivers/Flint 0359 Hse. Medstead Not started 11 11 0 5 6 0 0 11 0

40 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Site Address Status Permitted Net Dwls 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2008/13 2013/14 Other Dwls Available Supply Jolly Sailor, 0360 Petersfield Not started 10 10 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 74-76 Anstey 0361# Rd. Alton Not started 8 8 -2 10 0 0 0 8 0 51 London Rd. 0362# Liphook Not started 25 25 -2 27 0 0 0 25 0 32A Butts Rd. 0363 Alton Not started 14 14 0 14 0 0 0 14 0 Hazel Cottage, 0364 Chase Rd. Not started 12 12 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 Bordon 1213 1381 422 235 226 213 171 1267 108 6

Note: # denotes reply to questionnaire survey June 2008

12/11/08

41 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

EAST HAMPSHIRE SCHEDULE OF LARGE HOUSING SITES: SOUTH HAMPSHIRE (part) as at 1 April 2008 Site Address Status Permitted Net Dwls 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2008/13 2013/14 Other Dwls Available Supply Havant Rd. Reserve 0274 Horndean allocation, draft 0 (46) 0 (10) (30) (20) 0 (60) 0 brief prepared for consultation Green Lane, Reserve 0275 Clanfield allocation, draft 0 (275) 0 (30) (50) (50) (50) (180) (50) (45) brief prepared for consultation. No pp. Castle Coaches 5 built rest 0339# Horndean under 7 7 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 construction Oaklands Hse. Reserve 0340 R Castle allocation, draft 0 (40) 0 (20) (20) 0 0 (40) 0 brief being prepared for consultation. N of James Reserve alloc. 0342 Copse Cl. Council 0 (85) 0 0 0 (45) (40) (85) 0 Horndean resolution to develop. 74 Five Heads 0358 Rd. Horndean Not started 11 11 0 11 0 0 0 11 0 18 18 (446) 0 18 (60) 0 (100) 0 (115) 0 (90) 18 (365) 0 (50) (45) 18 464 0 78 100 115 90 383 50 45

Note: # denotes reply to questionnaire survey June 2008 12/11/08 figures in brackets represent supply coming forward from ‘reserve’ housing sites.

42 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Appendix 6

Sites in the SBP

Site ref. Site Phasing Estimated 2011 – 2016 2016 - 2021 dwelling numbers South Hampshire CL003 1 New Road, 5 0 5 Clanfield CL005 3 Drift Road, 0 11 11 Clanfield HD005 The Dump, 10 0 10 Five heads Road, Horndean (part) HD019 211 3 0 3 Lovedean Lane, Lovedean. (part) HD031 Gales 40 28 68 Brewery, Horndean

Central Hampshire AL007 28 Borovere 11 11 22 Lane, Alton AL008 The 6 5 11 Vicarage, Vicarage Hill, Alton. AL009 Bass Sports 70 42 112 Ground, Anstey Lane Alton. AL010 Convent 18 0 18 School, Anstey Lane, Alton. AL012 The Malt 15 14 29

43 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

House, Turk Street, Alton. AL024 Lloyd’s Yard, 5 0 5 High Street, Alton. AL025 Land Rear of 13 0 13 Alton House Hotel, Normandy Street, Alton. AL040 1 London 5 6 11 Road, Holybourne, Alton. BIN001 Holt Leigh 10 6 16 House, Back Lane, Bucks Horn Oak. FAR001 Land at 30 12 42 Farringdon Mill, Farringdon. FM004 Windmill 10 0 10 Public House, Winchester Road, Four Marks. LIS014 Kelsey’s 0 5 5 Doctor’s Surgery, Mill Road, Liss. LIP007 Land rear of 11 0 11 14 London Road, Liphook MED012 Land to the 2 0 2 rear of the Junipers, South Town Road, Medstead. (part) MED006 Land at 4 0 4 Wood field, Windsor

44 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Road, Medstead. (part) PET007 Herne 61 40 101 County, Junior School, Petersfield. ROP001 Builder’s 10 0 10 Yard, The Dene, Ropley Deane. WHI002 Land South 18 0 18 of Pinehill Road, Whitehill. WHI007/009 Land at 40 25 65 Lynton Villa’s / Land at Lynton Road, Bordon.

45 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

Appendix 7

Greenfield SHLAA sites not including reserve sites.

Note: The SHLAA contributes towards the evidence base of the LDF. Policy decisions will be made in the appropriate DPD, not in the SHLAA. The identification of potential housing sites, buildings or areas in the SHLAA does not state or imply that the District Council would necessarily grant planning permission for residential development. Nor does identification in the SHLAA automatically qualify the site for allocation through the Site Allocations DPD for residential or any other type of development.

Alton AL001 Land at Borovere Farm, Selborne Road, Alton AL005 Land at Cadnams Farm, Alton AL015 Land west of Upper Neatham Mill Lane, Holybourne, Alton AL033 Land at Will Hall Farm, Alton AL034 Land at Weysprings, Alton Bentley BEN001 Land to the West of Crossroads, Bentley BEN003 Land South of Main Road, Bentley BEN004 Land to south east of crossroads, Bentley BEN005 Land West of Hole Lane, Bentley BEN006 Land at Crocks Farm, Bentley BEN007 Land east of Crocks Farm Cottages, Bentley Bentworth BTW001 Land at Ashley Road Bentworth Binsted BIN003 Land adj to Linden Fullers Road Holt Pound BIN004 Land at Clements Close Clanfield (Southern Area) CL007 Land to rear of 113-135 Drift Road, Clanfield CL008 Land to rear of Trafalgar Rise, Clanfield Chawton CHA001 Land adjoining Winchester Road Chawton East Meon EM003 Land south of Coombe Road East Meon EM004 Land east of Chapel Street, East Meon Farringdon FAR002 Land at Crows Lane Upper Farringdon Four Marks FM006 Land at 172 Winchester Road, Four Marks FM007 Land west of Uplands Lane , Four Marks FM009 Land to the rear of 97 - 103 Blackberry Lane, Four Marks

46 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

FM011 Land at The Meadow & r/o 131 Winchester Road, Four Marks FM012 Land at Blackberry Lane, Four Marks FM014 Land south of Winchester Road, Four Marks Froxfield FRX001 Privett Road, High Cross, Froxfield Greatham GRE003 Land to South of Benhams Lane GRE004 Liss Forest Nurseries Petersfield Road GRE005 Land west of Manaccan, Longmoor Road, Greatham GRE006 Land north of Longmoor Road, Greatham Headley HEA001 Land South of The Paddock, Headley HEA007 Land at Headley Nurseries, Glayshers Hill, Headley Horndean (Southern Area) HD003 Land at Coldhill Copse, Lovedean Lane (Site 2) HD004 Land West of Lovedean Lane Horndean HD006 Woodcroft Farm, Woodcroft Lane, Waterlooville HD008 Land at Lovedean Lane (Site 1) HD012 Land at Chalk Hill Road, Horndean HD014 Land at london Road, between Hillside Ind Est and the Caravan Park HD015 Land at Pyle Farm, Pyle Lane HD016 Keydell Nurseries HD018 Land at White Dirt Farm, White Dirt Lane, Catherington HD020 Land at Hazelton Farm, Horndean HD023 102-120 Downhouse Road, Clanfield HD024 Land north west of James Copse Close Horndean HD030 155 Lovedean Lane and land rear of 157 & 159, Horndean Kingsley KIN001 Land north of School Fields, Kingsley KIN003 Land at Sickles Lane , Kingsley Lasham LAS003 Land north of Lasham Hill Lane, Lasham Lindford LIN003 Land off Lindford Road, Lindford Liphook LIP004 Land south of A3 Liphook LIP013 Land at Headley Road, Liphook LIP014 Land at Chitley Farm 63 Chitley Lane, Liphook LIP024 Land at Little Boarhunt, Portsmouth Road,Liphook LIP027 Land at Church Road, Bramshott, Liphook Liss LIS003 Land at Hilliers Nurseries, Andlers Ash Road, Liss LIS008 Kippences Farnham Road/Station Road, Liss Medstead MED001 Land north east of Lymington Bottom Road, Medstead

47 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009

MED003 Beverly Farm, Five Ash Road, Medstead MED004 Land east of Boyneswood Road, Medstead MED005 Land at Benwhyles, Boyneswood Road, Medstead MED008 Land east of Stoney Lane, Medstead MED013 Land east of Cedar Stables, Castle Street, Medstead MED017 Land to rear of Lymington Barn Retail Centre, Lymington Bottom Road MED019 Land opposite Merrow Down, Boyneswood Lane, Four Marks Petersfield PET001 Land North of Station Road PET008 Land South of Paddock Way, Petersfield PET012 Land west of The Causeway, Petersfield PET017 Units 1 & 2 The Domes, Durford Road, Petersfield Selbourne SEL002 Land to rear of Ketchers Field off Selborne Road SEL004 Burlands, Selborne Road SEL006 Land south of Eveley Corner Firgrove Road Rowland’s Castle (Southern Area) RC002 Land at Deerleap, Rowlands Castle RC004 Land at Former Rowlands Castle Brickworks, The Drift, Rowlands Castle RC005 Land South of Oaklands, Rowlands Castle Worldham WOR001 Land at Blanket Street East Worldham WOR002 Land at Park Farm Blanket Street WOR003 Land west of Wyck Lane East Worldham