DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2011 Annual Monitoring Report Annex 1 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment November 2011 1 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2011 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. The role of the SHLAA 3-4 3. Background and approach 4 4. Methodology 4 5. Study findings 5-17 6. Monitoring and review 18 7. Conclusions drawn from the SHLAA process 18 8. Appendices 19-50 Appendix 1 - Methodology 20-26 Appendix 2 - Schedule of large housing sites 27-35 Appendix 3 - Sites in the settlement policy boundary 36-37 Appendix 4 - Housing trajectory 38-41 Appendix 5 - Five year housing supply 42-47 Appendix 6 – Greenfield SHLAA sites 48-50 2 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2011 East Hampshire Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2011. 1. Introduction National planning policy (PPS3) states that all Local Planning Authorities should undertake a Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA). The SHLAA is seen by Government as a key tool in the development of local housing policy, and in demonstrating a 5 year supply of deliverable housing sites. The SHLAA has the following objectives: • To inform the Council’s strategy for the provision of housing to meet the housing target for the district through its Core Strategy Development Plan Document. • To identify potential sites for new housing development and assess their suitability, availability and deliverability. • To inform the subsequent allocation of sites for housing in the Local Development Framework. • To inform the plan, monitor and manage the approach for the provision of housing land and the Council’s assessment of a five year supply of deliverable sites as required by PPS3. The SHLAA forms part of the background evidence for the Local Development Framework (LDF). It identifies potential housing sites within the district which can be used through the Core Strategy and the Site Allocations Development Plan Documents (DPD) to fulfil housing targets. This is the third SHLAA to be carried out by East Hampshire District Council. 2. The role of the SHLAA The SHLAA contributes towards the evidence base of the LDF. Policy decisions will be made in the appropriate DPD, not in the SHLAA. In addition, the SHLAA does not make any formal planning decisions and therefore cannot be used for development control purposes. The identification of potential housing sites, buildings or areas in the SHLAA does not state or imply that the District Council would necessarily grant planning permission for residential development. Nor does identification in the SHLAA automatically qualify the site for allocation through the Site Allocations DPD for residential or any other type of development. 3 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2011 Planning applications will continue to be treated on their own merits at the time of the planning application and not on the information contained in the SHLAA. The SHLAA does not prevent planning applications being submitted on any sites identified in or excluded from the report at any time. The supply of SHLAA sites will show the choices available to meet the need and demand for housing within the district. This will provide a basis for future decision making which determines the location of housing within the district. Overall, sites identified in this report and its appendices have no additional planning status and inclusion in the SHLAA does not imply a presumption of planning approval for residential development on any site. 3. Background and approach The need to conduct a SHLAA was first stated in PPS3 (November 2006). Detailed guidance has been published by the Department for Communities and Local Government, in the form of ‘Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessments, Practice Guidance 2007’. This guidance sets out the process which East Hampshire District Council has followed in the preparation of the SHLAA. The SHLAA is a systematic study of land in the District which is likely to be available for housing development in the period up to 2028. The guidance highlights the importance of partnership working. This approach involves working with key stakeholders such as developers, landowners, town and parish councils, and other agencies. These stakeholders can provide expertise on the deliverability of sites, as well as advice on issues of site suitability. The 2011 SHLAA had a cut off point of 31 March 2011 for receipt of sites. Sites received after that date will be included in the 2012 SHLAA. 4. Methodology The methods used in East Hampshire District Council’s SHLAA are based on the guidance: Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessments, Practice Guidance July 2007, published by DCLG, with some minor alterations to reflect local circumstances. The diagram and text in Appendix 1 sets out the detailed stages in the process. 4 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2011 5. Study Findings District Housing Requirement Figures The housing requirement figures for East Hampshire District Council are based on the ‘Option 1’ figures submitted to SEERA of 5200 dwellings for the total 20 year period between 2006 and 2026, an average of 260 per annum. In East Hampshire the Option 1 targets are the same as the South East Plan housing targets. The housing requirements are based on two areas. Firstly, the Central Hampshire part of East Hampshire District, which is made up of the South Downs National Park and the area to the ‘north of the South Downs National Park’ and forms part of the Rest of Hampshire in the South East Plan. Secondly, the South Hampshire part of East Hampshire District, which is made up of the three ‘Southern Parishes’ and forms part of the South Hampshire Sub-region in the South East Plan. This area is also referred to as the ‘PUSH’ area (Partnership for Urban South Hampshire). The part of the district which falls within the South Hampshire area will take 1200 new dwellings between 2006 and 2026, an average of 60 per annum. The remainder of the district (Central Hampshire) will take the remaining 4000 new dwellings between 2006 and 2026, an average of 200 per year. However, in order to satisfy planning policy guidance the housing requirement has to cover the period of 15 years from the next financial year from the year of adoption of the Joint Core Strategy (December 2012). The total housing requirement is therefore 1,320 dwellings for South Hampshire between 2006 and 2028 and 4,400 dwellings for Central Hampshire between 2006 and 2028. The RSS housing figures reflect the substantial body of work carried out for the South East Plan. The figures reflect the environmental and other constraints recognised as existing across the central belt of Hampshire, and in particular in East Hampshire, with the South Downs National Park and internationally protected wildlife designations (Special Protection Areas etc). The Whitehill Bordon Eco-town remains a strategic issue and a matter for the Joint Core Strategy. Objectives have been developed to underpin the strategy that will enable East Hampshire to realise its overall spatial vision and deliver the Green Town Vision for Whitehill Bordon. Provision will be made for up to 4000 dwellings over the Plan period. The housing figures for Whitehill Bordon are in addition to those in the South East Plan referred to above. Any development will help to meet the housing needs of Whitehill Bordon, but will also meet some of the need and demand arising from the wider area. 5 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2011 The Council has carried out a separate assessment of housing requirements (Local Housing Requirements Study, June 2011, Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners). The study set out a number of scenarios based on different demographic and economic factors. The scenarios are, however, based purely on demographic and economic factors and do not take account of wider issues, such as the vision and objectives in the Joint Core Strategy and the specific constraints which apply to the district. In this respect a key element of the vision of the Joint Core Strategy is the successful development of the Whitehill Bordon Eco-town. The Council is fully committed to the successful development of Whitehill Bordon. Any proposal which undermines this would be contrary to the Joint Core Strategy and could have adverse implications for the successful implementation of this sustainable brownfield development project. In addition, environmental and other constraints are recognised as existing across the central belt of Hampshire, as referred to above. Within the South Downs National Park, housing provision will be restricted to that needed to serve its communities. The National Park Circular1 states that “The Government recognises that the National Parks are not suitable locations for unrestricted housing and does not therefore provide general housing targets for them. The expectation is that new housing will be focused on meeting affordable housing requirements, supporting local employment opportunities and key services”. Figure 1 below shows a summary of the scenarios based on Figure 5.1 of the Local Housing Requirement study, but with a figure of 4,000 dwellings for Whitehill Bordon (taken from the Joint Core Strategy) rather than 5,300 as used in Figure 5.1. Figure 1. Summary of Scenarios RSS Requirement 900 Dis tric t RSS Requir ement With 769 800 Whitehill/Bordon 752 700 598 600 528 514 486 500 400 313 300 New DwellingsNew p.a. 204 200 100 0 A: H: B: Net Housing Baseline Scenario Scenario Scenario C: Long Migration D: Short Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario G: Lower E: Higher Scenario Economic Economic Term PastTerm Economic Term PastTerm F: Medium Demographic Led Demographic Led Economic Led Housing Led 1 English National Parks and the Broads. UK Government Vision and Circular 2010. 6 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2011 The district housing requirement as set out in the South East Plan provides for a level of housing requirement which recognises the constraints which apply to the district.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990
    Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 LIST OF NEW PLANNING AND OTHER APPLICATIONS, RECEIVED AND VALID WEEKLY LIST AS AT 12 July 2021 The following is a list of applications which have been received and made valid in the week shown above. These will be determined, under an agency agreement, by East Hants District Council, unless the application is ‘called in’ by the South Downs National Park Authority for determination. Further details regarding the agency agreement can be found on the SDNPA website at www.southdowns.gov.uk. If you require any further information please contact East Hants District Council who will be dealing with the application. IMPORTANT NOTE: The South Downs National Park Authority has adopted the Community Infrastructure Levy Charging Schedule, which will take effect from 01 April 2017. Applications determined after 01 April will be subject to the rates set out in the Charging Schedule (https://www.southdowns.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy/community-infrastructure-levy/). If you have any questions, please contact [email protected] or tel: 01730 814810. Want to know what’s happening in the South Downs National Park? Sign up to our monthly newsletter to get the latest news and views delivered to your inbox www.southdowns.gov.uk/join-the-newsletter WLVAL East Hampshire District Council Team: East Hants DM team Parish: Binsted Parish Council Ward: Binsted, Bentley & Selborne Ward Case No: SDNP/21/02912/HOUS Type: Householder Date Valid: 6 July 2021 Decision due: 31 August 2021 Case Officer: Ashton Carruthers Applicant: Mr James Gossage Proposal: Conversion of existing double garage to form habitable rooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure Strategy 2011 - 2028
    East Hampshire District Council Green Infrastructure Strategy 2011 - 2028 Part 1 - Main Strategy July 2013 Contents Executive Summary Page 1 Introduction Page 2 What is Green Infrastructure? Page 3 Strategic Framework Page 4 The Green Infrastructure Network Page 6 Delivering Green Infrastructure Page 7 Theme 1: Landscape, Heritage and Sense of Place Page 10 Theme 2: Biodiversity Page 13 Theme 3: Water Resources Page 16 Theme 4: Woodlands Page 19 Theme 5: Access and Recreation Page 22 Theme 6: Health and Well-Being Page 25 Theme 7: Local Awareness and Involvement Page 27 Delivery, Funding and Monitoring Page 29 Glossary Page 32 Part 2: Supporting Information Separate document Acknowledgements We are grateful for the contributions made from the following organisations: East Hampshire District Council, South Downs National Park Authority, Whitehill & Bordon Eco Town, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust, Hampshire County Council, the local authorities in the study area (Basingstoke & Deane, Hart, Rushmoor, Guildford, Waverley, Chichester, Havant, Portsmouth, Fareham, Winchester), Environment Agency, Natural England, Forestry Commission, East Hampshire Environment Network, West Weald Landscape Project, URS Scott Wilson and Sussex Wildlife Trust. We would also like to acknowledge and thank all the attendees at the workshops of 11th April 2013, for their input and constructive comments on the draft strategic priorities. Cover photos courtesy of East Hampshire District Council, Environment X Change, South Downs National Park Authority. Left to right, Alice Holt woodland ride, Alice Holt Visitor Centre, River Wey, heathland near Whitehill & Bordon, downland scarp slope, Whitehill & Bordon Page 1 Executive Summary This Green Infrastructure Strategy for East Hampshire was The key conclusions of the Strategy are that: commissioned as part of the evidence base for East Hampshire East Hampshire’s existing green infrastructure is valuable, but is District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Steep Buildings and Monuments
    Steep Buildings and Monuments Contents Introduction 1 Preface 3 Steep Parish Map 4 Ridge Common Lane 5 Lythe Lane 7 Dunhill and Dunhurst 7 Stoner Hill 9 Church Road 12 Mill Lane 25 Ashford Lane 28 Steep Hill and Harrow Lane 34 Steep Marsh, Bowers Common and London Road, Sheet 39 Bedales 42 The Hangers 47 Architects A - Z 48 The following reports also form part of the work of the Steep Parish Plan Steering Group and are available in separate documents, either accessible through the Steep Parish Plan website www.steepparishplan.org.uk or from the Steep Parish Clerk Steep Parish Plan 2012 Steep Settlements Character Assessment Steep Local Landscape Character Assessment October 2012 2 Introduction Steep is at the western edge of the Weald, within the Bedales grounds, the Memorial at the foot of the Hangers, with the Downs Library and Lupton Hall are outstanding and to the south. The earliest buildings were are Grade I listed. The influence of the Arts amongst a sporadic pattern of farmsteads and Crafts Movement can also be seen at at the foot of the Hangers’ scarp, which Ashford Chace, the War Memorial and Whiteman in the ‘Origins of Steep’ suggests Village Hall. were settled in early Saxon times. The The other influence that Bedales had on Hampshire Archaeology and Historic Build- Steep was through the parents of its pupils, ings Record confirms these suggestions. All who decided to live locally while their chil- Saints Church dates from 1125 and dren were educated at the School, Edward ‘Restalls’, a timber framed house on its east Thomas and his family being the prime ex- side is thought to be the oldest dwelling in ample.
    [Show full text]
  • People and Nature Network Green Infrastructure in the South Downs National Park and Wider South East
    PEOPLE AND NATURE NETWORK GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AND WIDER SOUTH EAST MARCH 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AUTHORS This Network would not have been possible without the input and support of Sharon Bayne BSc (Hons) MSc MCIEEM, LLM CEnv, Blackwood Bayne Ltd many people. The authors would like to thank the members of the original with officers from the SDNPA. 2014 Technical Working Group, comprised of officers from: Val Hyland BA Dip LA (Hons) PGCert. UD CMLI V Hyland Associates Ltd. South Downs National Park Authority; Ray Drabble, Chris Paterson, Bruce Collinson, Chris Sculthorpe, Veronica East Sussex, West Sussex, Hampshire and Surrey County Councils and Craddock Brighton and Hove unitary authority; GIS mapping and EcoServ-GIS modelling provided by Andrew Lawson Wealden, East Hampshire, Mid Sussex, Adur and Worthing representing Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre, www.sxbrc.org.uk local authorities; Suggested citation: S.Bayne & V.Hyland (2016), People and Nature Environment Agency, Natural England, Historic England, Forestry Commission, Woodland Trust; Network, Green Infrastructure in the South Downs National Park and wider South East, Report for South Downs National Park Authority and Partners Country Land and Business Association, National Farmers Union; Brighton and Lewes Downs Biosphere, Arun and Rother Rivers Trust. SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY In developing this Network the SDNPA has also worked closely with members South Downs Centre Cover image: of the Sussex, Surrey and Hampshire Local Nature Partnerships. North Street Egret’s Way shared path along the River Ouse. © Andrew Pickett/SDNPA Midhurst West Sussex GU29 9DH 01730 814810 © Crown copyright and database rights 2018 Ordnance Survey 100050083 CONTENTS CONTENTS A BRIEF HISTORY ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Liss Neighbourhood Development Plan
    FOREWORD Two years ago, Liss Parish Council decided that the village should have a Neighbourhood Development Plan. A dedicated team of volunteers has now produced this Plan for the Parish Council. The Plan provides a vision and objectives for the future of Liss, followed by planning policies and development briefs for our preferred green field sites for new housing to be built over the next twelve years. Careful thought has also been given to the village’s infrastructure, community facilities, and the environment. There has been a concerted drive to consult all who live in Liss and to involve the community through public forums and exhibitions. The Plan reflects, as far as it can, the aspirations and concerns of the villagers, and I consider that it provides the best template for our future within the South Downs National Park. After the National Park’s scrutiny and an independent examination, there will be a referendum in the village in 2017. A positive outcome, requiring a 50% vote in favour of the Plan, will mean that it binds developers legally to the Plan’s development proposals. I particularly thank all who have contributed to the Plan’s production. It has been a major undertaking which should allow our village to develop in a positive direction. Vice Admiral Sir John Dunt KCB BSc CEng FIET Chairman, Liss Village Neighbourhood Development Plan Steering Group The Neighbourhood Plan group, through the leadership of Sir John Dunt, and the determination of the project manager Roger Hargreaves, have worked diligently to develop this plan. Following the extensive public consultation carried out by the group, I believe the plan reflects the will of the community and balances the need for new housing with maintaining the unique character and landscape of our ‘hidden village’.
    [Show full text]
  • Petersfield Is Well Connected, Being Only One Hour Petersfield Daytime Pollution in Your Area
    Public Transport - Bus My Journey is here to help you choose Walking Public Transport - Train 91/92/93 how to travel. By knowing all the ways Travel in Petersfield – Rogate – Midhurst you can travel from A to B, you can save Bus Services money as well as reduce congestion and Walking for Health Petersfield is well connected, being only one hour Petersfield Daytime pollution in your area. Walking for Health is free to attend and suitable from London (Waterloo) and 30 minutes from 37 Monday to Sunday Irregular for people of all abilities, from beginners to Portsmouth. Petersfield – Clanfield – Waterlooville – Havant Sunday (92 only) 2 hourly We provide information on cycling, buses, more experienced walkers. Services are currently operated by South West Trains Daytime trains, car sharing and walking that can Operated by Emsworth & District and Stagecoach with several trains an hour to London via Guildford help you to find easier and cheaper ways It’s a great way to improve your health and Monday to Saturday Hourly† and Woking and to Portsmouth via Havant for of travelling sustainably. wellbeing, and meet new people. The walks are † Connects with service 38 to Alton South Coast connections. Operated by Stagecoach 94 Find out more at: ideal for people who would like to improve their Buriton – Petersfield www.myjourneyhampshire.com health by increasing their physical activity levels 38 and discover the beautiful countryside and Ticket Office and Facilities Daytime Petersfield – Liss – Greatham – Selborne – Alton scenery the local area has to offer. All walks are Petersfield Liss Monday to Friday Hourly Mon-Sat 06.10-20.00 06.20-12.00 Daytime led by trained walk leaders who are there to Operated by Wheel Drive Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • HAMPSHIRE. Ainger Rev
    620 SPARSHOLT. HAMPSHIRE. Ainger Rev. Francis Edwd.M. .A..Vicrge Butler William, gamekeeper to W. B. Hull Edwin, baker Bostock Samuel, Lainston house Puckle esq J eanes Cornelius, beer ret. &blacksmitb Cross Mrs. The Lodg& Colliru; J esse, baker, Dean Kerton John, dairyman Fitt Misses, Garston cottage Cross Phillip, Rack & Manger P.H. Lewington John, Wood:man inn Thorold Miss, Dean house (letters through Crawley, Winchstr) North James, dairyman Trask William, Watley cottage Farrant Henry John, farmer, Westley Warne Johm., farmeor, Craibwood Goater Benjamin, carrier Warren "\Villiam, farm bailiff to J. S. COlillERCIAL. Goater Geo. carpntr.&frmr.R.a:m grn Moss esq. Lower Dean farm .Avery Benjamin, wood dealer Goater Leonard, shopkeeper & bnker, Williams .Arthur C. farm bailift to the. Eishop Ann (Mrs.), boot & ;;hoe n.1lrr Post office Ecclesiastical Commissioners Butt Wm. gardnr. to Saml.Bostock esq Grace Henry, farmer, Crabwood STEEP is. a parish, 2 miles north-west from Peters- William Wailer esq. and Coldhayes, that of Mrs. Hor,sley field station on the direct line of the London and South Palmer. The manorial rights are held by Mrs. Hawker,. Western railway, in the Eastern division of the county, the Ecclesiastical Commissioners as representing the· East Meon hundred, Petersfield union, petty seseional Bishop of Winchester, and others. The principal land. division and county court district, and in the rural owners are Mrs. Palmar, Mrs. W. H. Hawker, Thoma& deanery of Petersfield and archdeaconry and diocese of William Wailer esq. Mrs. Balfour, J. Silvester, William Winchester; it includes part of Stroud Common, Bow- Ellis Chute Ellis esq. and J.
    [Show full text]
  • East Hampshire District Council Employment Land Review Update
    East Hampshire District Council Employment Land Review Update Final Report May 2013 Employment Land Review Update East Hampshire District Council FINAL REPORT May 2013 13432/MS/CGJ/LE Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners 14 Regent's Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL nlpplanning.com This document is formatted for double sided printing. © Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Ltd 2013. Trading as Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners. All Rights Reserved. Registered Office: 14 Regent's Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL All plans within this document produced by NLP are based upon Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright reserved. Licence number AL50684A East Hampshire Employment Land Review Update : Final Report Executive Summary This Employment Land Review Update has been prepared by Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners (NLP) on behalf of East Hampshire District Council. It is intended to inform the preparation of the Council’s Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy to 2028. The study provides current information on the existing employment sites and premises, and assesses future space needs for B class employment uses (offices, industry and warehousing) under a range of different growth scenarios. It also considers the current and future balance of demand and supply for employment land in the District, and appropriate policy approaches in relation to employment space for the final Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy. The key findings of the study are as follows: 1. East Hampshire has a successful economy which has proved relatively resilient through the recession, recording job growth in excess of the regional and national average over the past 12 years; a marginal decline in industrial jobs has been offset by strong service sector job growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Westwood House London Road, Petersfield
    Westwood House London Road, Petersfield Westwood House London Road, Petersfield Liss - 2 miles (London Waterloo 66 minutes), Petersfield - 3 miles (London Waterloo 66 minutes), Liphook - 5.3 miles (London Waterloo 64 minutes), Midhurst - 8.5 miles, Haslemere - 9.5 miles (London Waterloo 56 minutes), Chichester - 18 miles, Guildford - 23 miles, London - 54 miles (Distances and times are approximate) An immaculately presented family home in beautiful gardens and grounds on the West Sussex/Hampshire borders. Accommodation and Amenities Entrance hall | Drawing room | Dining room | Snug | Two studies| Kitchen/breakfast room| Utility/Boot room | Cloakroom Master bedroom with en suite bathroom| Guest bedrooms with en suite bathroom| Two further bedrooms | Dressing room/Bedroom five | Family bathroom Double garage | Games room | Bathroom | Kitchenette Swimming pool | Sun terrace | Barn garden store| Green house In all approximately 2.18 acres Knight Frank Haslemere 1 West Street, Haslemere Surrey GU27 2AB Tel: +44 1428 770 560 [email protected] knightfrank.co.uk Situation Westwood House is located within the South Downs National Park in a private position between Petersfield and Liphook. The nearby village of Rake provides a public house, an established garden centre and the highly regarded Church of England Primary School. The village of Liss, a short drive away, has a post office, Tesco express, a florist, pharmacy, and a doctor’s surgery. This, together the large village of Liphook have mainline train stations with services into London Waterloo and Portsmouth. The larger towns of Petersfield and Haslemere, provide a more comprehensive range of shopping and recreational facilities as well as two further mainline stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment
    East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009 Appendix 1 to Report DPP11/2009 East Hampshire District Council Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment July 2009 1 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009 2 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009 Contents 1. Introduction 2. The role of the SHLAA 3. Background and approach 4. Methodology a. Stage 1: Planning the assessment b. Stage 2: Sources of sites c. Stage 3: Desktop review of existing information d. Stage 4: Determining which sites and areas will be surveyed e. Stage 5: Carrying out the survey f. Stage 6: Estimating housing potential of each site g. Stage 7: Assessing when and whether sites are likely to be developed h. Stage 8: Review the assessment (including stage 9 and 10) 5. Study findings 6. Monitoring and review 7. Conclusions drawn from the SHLAA process 8. Appendices 3 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009 4 East Hampshire District Council SHLAA 2009 East Hampshire Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2009. 1. Introduction National planning policy (PPS3) states that all Local Planning Authorities should undertake a Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA). The SHLAA is seen by Government as a key tool in the development of local housing policy, and in demonstrating a 5 year supply of deliverable housing sites. The SHLAA has the following objectives: • To inform the Council’s strategy for the provision of housing to meet the South East Plan housing target for the district through its Core Strategy Development Plan Document. • To identify potential sites for new housing development and assess their suitability, availability and deliverability.
    [Show full text]
  • Ellis Wasson the British and Irish Ruling Class 1660-1945 Volume 1
    Ellis Wasson The British and Irish Ruling Class 1660-1945 Volume 1 Ellis Wasson The British and Irish Ruling Class 1660-1945 Volume 1 Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editor: Łukasz Połczyński ISBN 978-3-11-054836-5 e-ISBN 978-3-11-054837-2 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. © 2017 Ellis Wasson Published by De Gruyter Open Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editor: Łukasz Połczyński www.degruyteropen.com Cover illustration: © Thinkstock/bwzenith Contents Acknowledgements XIII Preface XIV The Entries XV Abbreviations XVII Introduction 1 List of Parliamentary Families 5 Dedicated to the memory of my parents Acknowledgements A full list of those who helped make my research possible can be found in Born to Rule. I remain deeply in debt to the inspiration and mentorship of David Spring. Preface In this list cadet, associated, and stem families are arranged in a single entry when substantial property passed between one and the other providing continuity of parliamentary representation (even, as was the case in a few instances, when no blood or marriage relationship existed). Subsidiary/cadet families are usually grouped under the oldest, richest, or most influential stem family. Female MPs are counted with their birth families, or, if not born into a parliamentary family, with their husband’s family.
    [Show full text]