Leibniz and the Chain Rule >MATH 1401 Spring 2007 (#1) I Thought

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leibniz and the Chain Rule >MATH 1401 Spring 2007 (#1) I Thought Leibniz and the Chain Rule –MATH 1401 Spring 2007 (#1) I thought that you might bene…t from a historical pro…le of Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716), co-inventor of Di¤erential Calculus. Leibniz is credited for giving calculus its name. He referred to it as in…nitesimal calculus. [Newton’s version of the derivative was called the ‡uxion. His paper was written in 1666 – not bad for a 23-year old...] Leibniz did not publish anything about calculus until 1684, but he wrote about many of his discoveries in letters and manuscripts as early as 1675. Although Leibniz had already seen Newton’swork, most experts agree that Leibniz’smathematical reasoning was certainly di¤erent than Newton’s. Neither de…ned the derivative in terms of limits, but Leibniz was the …rst to introduce the idea of in…nitesimally small quantities, dx and dy, and thus, identi…ed dy the slope of a tangent line to a curve as : Leibniz relied heavily on calculations based dx on geometry and graphs, but did not de…ne his version of the derivative as the slope of the tangent line. Leibniz is credited with discovering the Product Rule for derivatives. His “proof” is not rigorous and assumes the basic properties of limits (in this case, the limit as dx 0): ! dy dy (y + dy) y If represents the derivative, then we have = : dx dx dx [This, of course, resembles the di¤erence quotient, or slope of the secant line.] If we wish to …nd the derivative of a product y = uv [It is assumed that the x’s are hidden inside the u and v:], then we have d (uv) (u + du)(v + dv) uv uv + u (dv) + (du) v + (du)(dv) uv = = dx dx dx u (dv) + (du) v + (du)(dv) dv du du = = u + v + dv dx dx dx dx dv The last term could also be written as (du) : dx Since dv is in…nitesimally small, the last term vanishes and we have d (uv) dv du = u + v: dx dx dx [Newton would have written this as [uv]0 = uv0 + u0v:] (#2) Your challenge... Using Leibniz’snotation, “prove”this: du dv u v u d dx dx v = dx v2 1 (#3) The Product and Quotient Rules were “easy” for Leibniz. The Chain Rule would be more di¢ cult to “prove”, but its form using Leibniz notation is very simple. Recall that if we have the composite function y = f (g (x)) and dy Outer : y = f (u) f 0 (u) = ) du du Inner : u = g (x) g0 (x) = ; ) dx then since y is ultimately a function of x; we have y0 (x) = [f (g (x))]0 = f 0 (g (x)) g0 (x) : Since we must evaluate f 0 at g (x) ; we have dy = f (u) = f (g (x)) du 0 0 and thus, we see why Leibniz says that the derivative acts like a fraction: dy dy du = : dx du dx It looks like the du’sare being cancelled, but, in fact, all we are doing is multiplying derivatives per Newton. (#4) More notation... Since y0 = f 0 (u) and we desire to evaluate f 0 (u) at u = g (x) ; a notation is sometimes added to the base of the parentheses. dy dy du = dx du dx u=g(x) Another popular equivalent notation uses the “evaluation bar”. dy dy du = dx du dx g(x) I prefer to place evaluations in square brackets. It typically removes any possible confusion. dy dy du = dx du dx g(x) In both notations, it is assumed that y is a function of u and that we are evaluating at u = g (x) : (#5) Parametric equations. Suppose we have moving particle and we desire to record its position with respect to time. The customary method would be to establish TWO functions of t –one to record the x-coordinate and another to record the y-coordinate. One of the exercises asks us to describe uniform circular motion. Suppose we have a particle on a unit circle centered at the origin: x2 + y2 = 1: We will start the particle at P (1; 0) and suggest the following two functions: x = x (t) = cos (t) y = y (t) = sin (t) ; 0 t 2: 2 (a) How do we know that this traces out a circle? Eliminate t: If we square both sides, we have x2 = cos2 (t) y2 = sin2 (t) : Now add the two equations together. x2 + y2 = cos2 (t) + sin2 (t) = 1: Thus, for any given value of t; the point (x (t) ; y (t)) must land on the unit circle. (b) You might recall that if t represents an angle in standard position, then the corresponding point on the unit circle is always (cos (t) ; sin (t)) : Furthermore, as t increases, the point of interest travels from P (1; 0) through all four quadrants (makes one complete revolution) and then returns to P: y 1 Example: 0 .5 p3 1 When t = ; our particle is located at ; : 0 6 2 2 -1 -0.5 0 0 .5 1 ! x -0.5 -1 (c) Since the parameterization traces out the circle, is it possible to use the parameterization to …nd the slope of the tangent line at a particular time? The answer is YES. From Leibniz’sform of the Chain Rule, we have dy dy dt m = = : tan dx dx dt Remember that Leibniz said that derivatives act like fractions. Let’stry it! dy d dx d = [sin (t)] = cos (t) = [cos (t)] = sin (t) dt dt dt dt Thus, the slope of the tangent line should be dy cos (t) mtan = = = cot (t) : dx ( sin (t)) When t = ; we believe the correct answer is cot = p3: 6 6 Let’ssee if this agrees with the geometry. 3 The slope of the radius is 1 y2 y1 2 1 mradius = = = : x2 x1 p p3 3 2 ! We recall that the products of the slopes of perpendicular lines must be ( 1) : Thus, the slope of the tangent line to the circle (perpendicular to the radial segment) must be p3 mtan = = p3:X 1 ! Also, we can check this with the General Power form of the Chain Rule! The equation of the upper semicircle is 1=2 f (x) = 1 x2 = 1 x2 : p p3 The slope of the tangent line at x = is 2 2 1=2 1 2 1=2 2 1 1 1 x 0 = 1 x 1 x 0 = ( 2x) 2 2 p1 x2 h i x = : p1 x2 Thus, we have p3 p3 p3 p3 2 ! 2 ! 2 ! f 0 = = = 2 2 3 1 ! p3 1 1 4 4 v r r u 2 ! u t p3 2 ! = = p3: 1 X 2 (#6) Notice that the slope of the tangent line does NOT depend on the parameterization. This is a di¤erent parameterization of the circle. We can still square both sides, add the equations, and we will again obtain x2 + y2 = 1: x = cos t2 2 y = sin t p3 1 So we should see that when t = ; the particle will be located at ; : 6 2 2 r ! 4 Will Leibniz give us the same slope for the tangent line? YES! Let’stry the formula again. We will invoke the Chain Rule forms for the trig. functions! dy 2 2 2 = cos t t 0 = 2t cos t dt dx 2 2 2 = sin t t 0 = 2t sin t dt dy dy dt 2t cos t2 = = = cot t2 : dx dx ( 2t sin (t2)) dt When t = ; the slope of the tangent line must be 6 r 2 cot = cot = p3:X 6 ! 6 r (#7) Leibniz also gives us a formula for instantaneous speed along the parametric curve. Typically, if speed is a function of t; the name of the function is c (t) [since c; the constant, is the speed of light]. This text does not give the speed function a speci…c name. Here’sthe formula: 2 2 dx dy 2 2 c (t) = + = (x0 (t)) + (y0 (t)) : s dt dt q In this formula, the parameterization DOES matter. Let’s look at our original parameterization for uniform circular motion. Why is it called “uniform”? We will answer this shortly. x = cos (t) y = sin (t) dx 2 dy 2 c (t) = + = ( sin (t))2 + (cos (t))2 s dt dt q = sin2 (t) + cos2 (t) = 1: q If t is measured in seconds, then the speed of the particular travelling around the unit circle must be one unit per second. Since the circumference of that circle is 2r = 2 (1) = 2 units, then we see that one revolution must take exactly 2 seconds. Hence, the motion on the circle is uniform in the sense that the particle is travelling at a constant speed and that we can track its progress with the associated central angle, which is also increasing uniformly with time. 5 If we examine the alternate parameterization, we have x = cos t2 2 y = sin t dx 2 dy 2 c (t) = + = ( 2t sin (t2))2 + (2t cos (t2))2 s dt dt q = 4t2 sin (t2) + 4t2 cos (t2) = p4t2 sin (t2) + cos (t2) p p = 2t (1) = 2t: If assume that t 0; then p4t2 = 2t = 2t: j j This tells us that the speed increases linearly with time. At …rst, we move slowly, and then after a few more seconds, our angular speed is quite large. Here’sa graph of the x-coordinate vs. time: x 1 0.5 We complete one revolution each time the graph achieves its 0 maximum value (1) : 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 t -0.5 -1 (#8) We appeal to the Leibniz form of the Chain Rule when dealing with inverses.
Recommended publications
  • Circles Project
    Circles Project C. Sormani, MTTI, Lehman College, CUNY MAT631, Fall 2009, Project X BACKGROUND: General Axioms, Half planes, Isosceles Triangles, Perpendicular Lines, Con- gruent Triangles, Parallel Postulate and Similar Triangles. DEFN: A circle of radius R about a point P in a plane is the collection of all points, X, in the plane such that the distance from X to P is R. That is, C(P; R) = fX : d(X; P ) = Rg: Note that a circle is a well defined notion in any metric space. We say P is the center and R is the radius. If d(P; Q) < R then we say Q is an interior point of the circle, and if d(P; Q) > R then Q is an exterior point of the circle. DEFN: The diameter of a circle C(P; R) is a line segment AB such that A; B 2 C(P; R) and the center P 2 AB. The length AB is also called the diameter. THEOREM: The diameter of a circle C(P; R) has length 2R. PROOF: Complete this proof using the definition of a line segment and the betweenness axioms. DEFN: If A; B 2 C(P; R) but P2 = AB then AB is called a chord. THEOREM: A chord of a circle C(P; R) has length < 2R unless it is the diameter. PROOF: Complete this proof using axioms and the above theorem. DEFN: A line L is said to be a tangent line to a circle, if L \ C(P; R) is a single point, Q. The point Q is called the point of contact and L is said to be tangent to the circle at Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Chain Rule Name
    Anti-Chain Rule Name: The most fundamental rule for computing derivatives in calculus is the Chain Rule, from which all other differentiation rules are derived. In words, the Chain Rule states that, to differentiate f(g(x)), differentiate the outside function f and multiply by the derivative of the inside function g, so that d f(g(x)) = f 0(g(x)) · g0(x): dx The Chain Rule makes computation of nearly all derivatives fairly easy. It is tempting to think that there should be an Anti-Chain Rule that makes antidiffer- entiation as easy as the Chain Rule made differentiation. Such a rule would just reverse the process, so instead of differentiating f and multiplying by g0, we would antidifferentiate f and divide by g0. In symbols, Z F (g(x)) f(g(x)) dx = + C: g0(x) Unfortunately, the Anti-Chain Rule does not exist because the formula above is not Z always true. For example, consider (x2 + 1)2 dx. We can compute this integral (correctly) by expanding and applying the power rule: Z Z (x2 + 1)2 dx = x4 + 2x2 + 1 dx x5 2x3 = + + x + C 5 3 However, we could also think about our integrand above as f(g(x)) with f(x) = x2 and g(x) = x2 + 1. Then we have F (x) = x3=3 and g0(x) = 2x, so the Anti-Chain Rule would predict that Z F (g(x)) (x2 + 1)2 dx = + C g0(x) (x2 + 1)3 = + C 3 · 2x x6 + 3x4 + 3x2 + 1 = + C 6x x5 x3 x 1 = + + + + C 6 2 2 6x Since these answers are different, we conclude that the Anti-Chain Rule has failed us.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quotient Rule Integration by Parts Formula Jennifer Switkes ([email protected]), California State Polytechnic Univer- Sity, Pomona, CA 91768
    A Quotient Rule Integration by Parts Formula Jennifer Switkes ([email protected]), California State Polytechnic Univer- sity, Pomona, CA 91768 In a recent calculus course, I introduced the technique of Integration by Parts as an integration rule corresponding to the Product Rule for differentiation. I showed my students the standard derivation of the Integration by Parts formula as presented in [1]: By the Product Rule, if f (x) and g(x) are differentiable functions, then d f (x)g(x) = f (x)g(x) + g(x) f (x). dx Integrating on both sides of this equation, f (x)g(x) + g(x) f (x) dx = f (x)g(x), which may be rearranged to obtain f (x)g(x) dx = f (x)g(x) − g(x) f (x) dx. Letting U = f (x) and V = g(x) and observing that dU = f (x) dx and dV = g(x) dx, we obtain the familiar Integration by Parts formula UdV= UV − VdU. (1) My student Victor asked if we could do a similar thing with the Quotient Rule. While the other students thought this was a crazy idea, I was intrigued. Below, I derive a Quotient Rule Integration by Parts formula, apply the resulting integration formula to an example, and discuss reasons why this formula does not appear in calculus texts. By the Quotient Rule, if f (x) and g(x) are differentiable functions, then ( ) ( ) ( ) − ( ) ( ) d f x = g x f x f x g x . dx g(x) [g(x)]2 Integrating both sides of this equation, we get f (x) g(x) f (x) − f (x)g(x) = dx.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous Functions, Smooth Functions and the Derivative C 2012 Yonatan Katznelson
    ucsc supplementary notes ams/econ 11a Continuous Functions, Smooth Functions and the Derivative c 2012 Yonatan Katznelson 1. Continuous functions One of the things that economists like to do with mathematical models is to extrapolate the general behavior of an economic system, e.g., forecast future trends, from theoretical assumptions about the variables and functional relations involved. In other words, they would like to be able to tell what's going to happen next, based on what just happened; they would like to be able to make long term predictions; and they would like to be able to locate the extreme values of the functions they are studying, to name a few popular applications. Because of this, it is convenient to work with continuous functions. Definition 1. (i) The function y = f(x) is continuous at the point x0 if f(x0) is defined and (1.1) lim f(x) = f(x0): x!x0 (ii) The function f(x) is continuous in the interval (a; b) = fxja < x < bg, if f(x) is continuous at every point in that interval. Less formally, a function is continuous in the interval (a; b) if the graph of that function is a continuous (i.e., unbroken) line over that interval. Continuous functions are preferable to discontinuous functions for modeling economic behavior because continuous functions are more predictable. Imagine a function modeling the price of a stock over time. If that function were discontinuous at the point t0, then it would be impossible to use our knowledge of the function up to t0 to predict what will happen to the price of the stock after time t0.
    [Show full text]
  • Laplace Transform
    Chapter 7 Laplace Transform The Laplace transform can be used to solve differential equations. Be- sides being a different and efficient alternative to variation of parame- ters and undetermined coefficients, the Laplace method is particularly advantageous for input terms that are piecewise-defined, periodic or im- pulsive. The direct Laplace transform or the Laplace integral of a function f(t) defined for 0 ≤ t< 1 is the ordinary calculus integration problem 1 f(t)e−stdt; Z0 succinctly denoted L(f(t)) in science and engineering literature. The L{notation recognizes that integration always proceeds over t = 0 to t = 1 and that the integral involves an integrator e−stdt instead of the usual dt. These minor differences distinguish Laplace integrals from the ordinary integrals found on the inside covers of calculus texts. 7.1 Introduction to the Laplace Method The foundation of Laplace theory is Lerch's cancellation law 1 −st 1 −st 0 y(t)e dt = 0 f(t)e dt implies y(t)= f(t); (1) R R or L(y(t)= L(f(t)) implies y(t)= f(t): In differential equation applications, y(t) is the sought-after unknown while f(t) is an explicit expression taken from integral tables. Below, we illustrate Laplace's method by solving the initial value prob- lem y0 = −1; y(0) = 0: The method obtains a relation L(y(t)) = L(−t), whence Lerch's cancel- lation law implies the solution is y(t)= −t. The Laplace method is advertised as a table lookup method, in which the solution y(t) to a differential equation is found by looking up the answer in a special integral table.
    [Show full text]
  • 9.2. Undoing the Chain Rule
    < Previous Section Home Next Section > 9.2. Undoing the Chain Rule This chapter focuses on finding accumulation functions in closed form when we know its rate of change function. We’ve seen that 1) an accumulation function in closed form is advantageous for quickly and easily generating many values of the accumulating quantity, and 2) the key to finding accumulation functions in closed form is the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. The FTC says that an accumulation function is the antiderivative of the given rate of change function (because rate of change is the derivative of accumulation). In Chapter 6, we developed many derivative rules for quickly finding closed form rate of change functions from closed form accumulation functions. We also made a connection between the form of a rate of change function and the form of the accumulation function from which it was derived. Rather than inventing a whole new set of techniques for finding antiderivatives, our mindset as much as possible will be to use our derivatives rules in reverse to find antiderivatives. We worked hard to develop the derivative rules, so let’s keep using them to find antiderivatives! Thus, whenever you have a rate of change function f and are charged with finding its antiderivative, you should frame the task with the question “What function has f as its derivative?” For simple rate of change functions, this is easy, as long as you know your derivative rules well enough to apply them in reverse. For example, given a rate of change function …. … 2x, what function has 2x as its derivative? i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Summary of Math 125 the Derivative of a Function F Is Another
    A Brief Summary of Math 125 The derivative of a function f is another function f 0 defined by f(v) − f(x) f(x + h) − f(x) f 0(x) = lim or (equivalently) f 0(x) = lim v!x v − x h!0 h for each value of x in the domain of f for which the limit exists. The number f 0(c) represents the slope of the graph y = f(x) at the point (c; f(c)). It also represents the rate of change of y with respect to x when x is near c. This interpretation of the derivative leads to applications that involve related rates, that is, related quantities that change with time. An equation for the tangent line to the curve y = f(x) when x = c is y − f(c) = f 0(c)(x − c). The normal line to the curve is the line that is perpendicular to the tangent line. Using the definition of the derivative, it is possible to establish the following derivative formulas. Other useful techniques involve implicit differentiation and logarithmic differentiation. d d d 1 xr = rxr−1; r 6= 0 sin x = cos x arcsin x = p dx dx dx 1 − x2 d 1 d d 1 ln jxj = cos x = − sin x arccos x = −p dx x dx dx 1 − x2 d d d 1 ex = ex tan x = sec2 x arctan x = dx dx dx 1 + x2 d 1 d d 1 log jxj = ; a > 0 cot x = − csc2 x arccot x = − dx a (ln a)x dx dx 1 + x2 d d d 1 ax = (ln a) ax; a > 0 sec x = sec x tan x arcsec x = p dx dx dx jxj x2 − 1 d d 1 csc x = − csc x cot x arccsc x = − p dx dx jxj x2 − 1 d product rule: F (x)G(x) = F (x)G0(x) + G(x)F 0(x) dx d F (x) G(x)F 0(x) − F (x)G0(x) d quotient rule: = chain rule: F G(x) = F 0G(x) G0(x) dx G(x) (G(x))2 dx Mean Value Theorem: If f is continuous on [a; b] and differentiable on (a; b), then there exists a number f(b) − f(a) c in (a; b) such that f 0(c) = .
    [Show full text]
  • Secant Lines TEACHER NOTES
    TEACHER NOTES Secant Lines About the Lesson In this activity, students will observe the slopes of the secant and tangent line as a point on the function approaches the point of tangency. As a result, students will: • Determine the average rate of change for an interval. • Determine the average rate of change on a closed interval. • Approximate the instantaneous rate of change using the slope of the secant line. Tech Tips: Vocabulary • This activity includes screen • secant line captures taken from the TI-84 • tangent line Plus CE. It is also appropriate for use with the rest of the TI-84 Teacher Preparation and Notes Plus family. Slight variations to • Students are introduced to many initial calculus concepts in this these directions may be activity. Students develop the concept that the slope of the required if using other calculator tangent line representing the instantaneous rate of change of a models. function at a given value of x and that the instantaneous rate of • Watch for additional Tech Tips change of a function can be estimated by the slope of the secant throughout the activity for the line. This estimation gets better the closer point gets to point of specific technology you are tangency. using. (Note: This is only true if Y1(x) is differentiable at point P.) • Access free tutorials at http://education.ti.com/calculato Activity Materials rs/pd/US/Online- • Compatible TI Technologies: Learning/Tutorials • Any required calculator files can TI-84 Plus* be distributed to students via TI-84 Plus Silver Edition* handheld-to-handheld transfer. TI-84 Plus C Silver Edition TI-84 Plus CE Lesson Files: * with the latest operating system (2.55MP) featuring MathPrint TM functionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Differential Calculus
    Proceedings of 2014 Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE Zone 1) Visual Differential Calculus Andrew Grossfield, Ph.D., P.E., Life Member, ASEE, IEEE Abstract— This expository paper is intended to provide = (y2 – y1) / (x2 – x1) = = m = tan(α) Equation 1 engineering and technology students with a purely visual and intuitive approach to differential calculus. The plan is that where α is the angle of inclination of the line with the students who see intuitively the benefits of the strategies of horizontal. Since the direction of a straight line is constant at calculus will be encouraged to master the algebraic form changing techniques such as solving, factoring and completing every point, so too will be the angle of inclination, the slope, the square. Differential calculus will be treated as a continuation m, of the line and the difference quotient between any pair of of the study of branches11 of continuous and smooth curves points. In the case of a straight line vertical changes, Δy, are described by equations which was initiated in a pre-calculus or always the same multiple, m, of the corresponding horizontal advanced algebra course. Functions are defined as the single changes, Δx, whether or not the changes are small. valued expressions which describe the branches of the curves. However for curves which are not straight lines, the Derivatives are secondary functions derived from the just mentioned functions in order to obtain the slopes of the lines situation is not as simple. Select two pairs of points at random tangent to the curves.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Terminology
    AP Calculus BC Calculus Terminology Absolute Convergence Asymptote Continued Sum Absolute Maximum Average Rate of Change Continuous Function Absolute Minimum Average Value of a Function Continuously Differentiable Function Absolutely Convergent Axis of Rotation Converge Acceleration Boundary Value Problem Converge Absolutely Alternating Series Bounded Function Converge Conditionally Alternating Series Remainder Bounded Sequence Convergence Tests Alternating Series Test Bounds of Integration Convergent Sequence Analytic Methods Calculus Convergent Series Annulus Cartesian Form Critical Number Antiderivative of a Function Cavalieri’s Principle Critical Point Approximation by Differentials Center of Mass Formula Critical Value Arc Length of a Curve Centroid Curly d Area below a Curve Chain Rule Curve Area between Curves Comparison Test Curve Sketching Area of an Ellipse Concave Cusp Area of a Parabolic Segment Concave Down Cylindrical Shell Method Area under a Curve Concave Up Decreasing Function Area Using Parametric Equations Conditional Convergence Definite Integral Area Using Polar Coordinates Constant Term Definite Integral Rules Degenerate Divergent Series Function Operations Del Operator e Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Deleted Neighborhood Ellipsoid GLB Derivative End Behavior Global Maximum Derivative of a Power Series Essential Discontinuity Global Minimum Derivative Rules Explicit Differentiation Golden Spiral Difference Quotient Explicit Function Graphic Methods Differentiable Exponential Decay Greatest Lower Bound Differential
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 3: Derivatives
    CHAPTER 3: Derivatives 3.1: Derivatives, Tangent Lines, and Rates of Change 3.2: Derivative Functions and Differentiability 3.3: Techniques of Differentiation 3.4: Derivatives of Trigonometric Functions 3.5: Differentials and Linearization of Functions 3.6: Chain Rule 3.7: Implicit Differentiation 3.8: Related Rates • Derivatives represent slopes of tangent lines and rates of change (such as velocity). • In this chapter, we will define derivatives and derivative functions using limits. • We will develop short cut techniques for finding derivatives. • Tangent lines correspond to local linear approximations of functions. • Implicit differentiation is a technique used in applied related rates problems. (Section 3.1: Derivatives, Tangent Lines, and Rates of Change) 3.1.1 SECTION 3.1: DERIVATIVES, TANGENT LINES, AND RATES OF CHANGE LEARNING OBJECTIVES • Relate difference quotients to slopes of secant lines and average rates of change. • Know, understand, and apply the Limit Definition of the Derivative at a Point. • Relate derivatives to slopes of tangent lines and instantaneous rates of change. • Relate opposite reciprocals of derivatives to slopes of normal lines. PART A: SECANT LINES • For now, assume that f is a polynomial function of x. (We will relax this assumption in Part B.) Assume that a is a constant. • Temporarily fix an arbitrary real value of x. (By “arbitrary,” we mean that any real value will do). Later, instead of thinking of x as a fixed (or single) value, we will think of it as a “moving” or “varying” variable that can take on different values. The secant line to the graph of f on the interval []a, x , where a < x , is the line that passes through the points a, fa and x, fx.
    [Show full text]
  • MATH 162: Calculus II Framework for Thurs., Mar
    MATH 162: Calculus II Framework for Thurs., Mar. 29–Fri. Mar. 30 The Gradient Vector Today’s Goal: To learn about the gradient vector ∇~ f and its uses, where f is a function of two or three variables. The Gradient Vector Suppose f is a differentiable function of two variables x and y with domain R, an open region of the xy-plane. Suppose also that r(t) = x(t)i + y(t)j, t ∈ I, (where I is some interval) is a differentiable vector function (parametrized curve) with (x(t), y(t)) being a point in R for each t ∈ I. Then by the chain rule, d ∂f dx ∂f dy f(x(t), y(t)) = + dt ∂x dt ∂y dt 0 0 = [fxi + fyj] · [x (t)i + y (t)j] dr = [fxi + fyj] · . (1) dt Definition: For a differentiable function f(x1, . , xn) of n variables, we define the gradient vector of f to be ∂f ∂f ∂f ∇~ f := , ,..., . ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂xn Remarks: • Using this definition, the total derivative df/dt calculated in (1) above may be written as df = ∇~ f · r0. dt In particular, if r(t) = x(t)i + y(t)j + z(t)k, t ∈ (a, b) is a differentiable vector function, and if f is a function of 3 variables which is differentiable at the point (x0, y0, z0), where x0 = x(t0), y0 = y(t0), and z0 = z(t0) for some t0 ∈ (a, b), then df ~ 0 = ∇f(x0, y0, z0) · r (t0). dt t=t0 • If f is a function of 2 variables, then ∇~ f has 2 components.
    [Show full text]