DOCSLIB.ORG

Modern Timeline.Pages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modern Timeline.Pages History of Modern Physics 1880-1930 Physicist Nat. date Type Description Thomas Young 1801 Demonstrated the wave nature of light using the double-slit experiment ! " Amedeo Avogadro 1811 $ Molecular theory of gasses. Gasses at the same temperature and volume # contain the same number of molecules. Robert Brown 1827 Observed jittery motion of minute particles inside pollen grains (now called ! " Brownian motion but previously observed by Jan Ingenhouse in 1784) James Maxwell 1873 Developed concise equations describing electricity and magnetism (Maxwell’s ! $ equations). Predicts electromagnetic waves that travel at the speed of light. Albert Michelson 1887 " Conducted the Michelson-Morely experiment in which he and Morley used an % interferometer to show the ether does not exist. Johannes Rydberg 1888 " Found an empirical formula describing the wavelengths of spectral lines & produced by hydrogen. Rydberg constant is named for him. Wilhelm Röntgen 1895 Produced and detected x-rays (also called Röntgen rays), a new form of ' " electromagnetic radiation. 1901 Nobel Prize. Pieter Zeeman 1896 Discovery of Zeeman effect. Many spectral lines can be sllit into multiple lines ( " in the presence of a magnetic field. 1902 Nobel Prize. Henri Becquerel 1896 " Discovery of radioactivity. 1903 Nobel Prize (shared with Marie and Pierre ) Curie). J.J. Thomson 1897 " Discovery of the electron. Cathode ray experiments showed the rays are made ! of particles (electrons) ejected from atoms in the electrodes. 1906 Nobel Prize. Marie Curie 1898 Discovery of radioactive elements Polonium and Radium. 1903 Nobel Prize * " (shared withe Becquerel and Pierre Curie). Ernest Rutherford 1899 Discovery of alpha and beta rays. Showed that uranium gives off two kinds of ! " radiation. Paul Villard ) 1900 " Discovery of gamma rays. Showed that this form of radiation from radioactive decay was not electrically charged, but could not penetrate as far as x-rays. Lord Rayleigh 1900 $ Derivation of Rayleigh-Jeans law of radiation from a blackbody using thermo- ! dynamics. Extension to short wavelengths led to the “ultraviolet catastrophe” Max Planck 1900 Blackbody radiation formula. Assumed quantized energies for light waves ' $ E! = h f, where h is Planck’s constant. Resolved ultraviolet catastrophe Hendrick Lorentz 1904 $ Derived the Lorentz transformation to relating observers’ measurements of ( space and time (later becomes part of Special Relativity). 1902 Nobel Prize. Albert Einstein 1905 Theory of Brownian motion: random motions are due to collisions with + $ molecules Albert Einstein 1905 Theory of photoelectric effect: electromagnetic waves act like particles. 1921 + $ Nobel Prize. Albert Einstein + 1905 $ Special theory of relativity. One’s measurements of space and time depend on one’s relative motion to another observer. Equivalence of mass and energy Robert Millikan 1909 " Millikan oil drop experiment. Measurement of the charge of the electron using % falling oil drops in electric field. 1923 Nobel Prize. Charles Wilson 1911 Invention of the cloud chamber. Photographed particle tracks for " and # ! " particles. 1927 Nobel Prize (shared with Compton). Ernest Rutherford 1911 Rutherford scattering of alpha particles from a gold foil. Evidence for atomic ! " nucleus and the proton. William L. Bragg 1912 Bragg diffraction. Showed that x-rays exhibit diffraction patterns when they , " pass through crystal lattices. Analyzed crystal structure. 1915 Nobel Prize. Niels Bohr 1 1913 $ Bohr-Rutherford model of the atom. Electrons orbit central nucleus with quantized angular momenta. Reproduces Balmer spectrum. 1922 Nobel Prize. Albert Einstein 1916 General theory of relativity. Extends special relativity to include gravity and + $ accelerating reference frames. Arthur Compton 1922 Compton effect. Showed that x-rays act like particles when they scatter off free % " electrons. 1927 Nobel Prize (shared with Wilson). Luis de Broglie 1922 Proposed wave nature of matter, thus creating field of wave mechanics. ) $ Wolfgang Pauli 1925 $ Formulated the Pauli exclusion principle, which says that no two electrons can / exist in the same quantum state. Werner Heisenberg 1925 Development of matrix mechanics, which was the first formalization of quantum ' $ mechanics. 1932 Nobel Prize. Erwin Schrödinger 1926 Wave mechanics approach to quantum physics. Schrödinger equation. Wave / $ functions for hydrogen atom, harmonic oscillator. 1933 Nobel Prize. Max Born 1926 Probabilistic interpretation of wave function. 1954 Nobel Prize. ' $ George Thomson 1927 " Demonstrated wave nature of electrons by diffracting them through gold foil. ! 1937 Nobel Prize. George Uhlenbeck 1927 $ Theoretical discovery of electron spin (with Samuel Goudsmit 1 ). Provided ( explanation of doublets in spectral lines. Werner Heisenberg 1927 Uncertainty principle. Measurement of one paired physical quantity (e.g. ' $ position) introduces uncertainty in the other (e.g. momentum). Paul Dirac 1928 Dirac equation: extension of Schrödinger equation to includes special relativity. ! $ Explanation of electron spin and predicts antimatter. 1933 Nobel Prize. Carl Anderson 1932 " Experimental discovery of antimatter (positron). Found particle tracks of % positrons (produced by cosmic rays) in a cloud chamber. 1936 Nobel Prize. James Chadwick 1932 Discovery of the neutron. 1935 Nobel Prize. ! " Otto Stern 1933 Stern-Gerlach experiment. Measured magnetic moment of the proton. * " Experimental verification of space quantization. 1943 Nobel Prize. Nationality: , Australia ) France - Ireland . India + Switzerland / Austria ' Germany 0 Israel ( Netherlands ! United Kingdom 1 Denmark 2 Hungary # Italy * Poland % United States Type of discovery: $ Theoretical discovery " Experimental discovery.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conference on the History of Quantum Physics Max-Planck-Institut Für Wissenschaftsgeschichte Berlin, 2–6 July 2007 Abstract
    Conference on the history of quantum physics Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte Berlin, 2–6 July 2007 Abstract Title: Walther Nernst, Albert Einstein, Otto Stern, Adriaan Fokker, and the rotational specific heat of hydrogen Author: Clayton A. Gearhart (St. John’s University, Minnesota, USA) In 1911, the German physical chemist Walther Nernst argued that the new quantum theory promised to clear up long-standing puzzles in kinetic theory, particularly in understanding the discrepancies between the predictions of the equipartition theorem and the measured specific heats of gases. Nernst noted that hydrogen gas would be a good test case. The first measurements were published by his assistant Arnold Euken in 1912, and showed a sharp drop in the specific heat at low temperatures, corresponding to rotational degrees of freedom “freezing out.” In his 1911 paper, Nernst also developed a theory for a quantum rotator (a tiny rotating dumbbell representing a diatomic gas). Remarkably, he did not quantize rotational energies. Instead, the specific heat fell off because the gas reached equilibrium by exchanging harmonic oscillator quanta with quantized Planck resonators. Nernst’s theory was flawed. But Einstein adopted a corrected version at the 1911 Solvay Conference, and in 1913, he and Otto Stern published a detailed treatment. Following Nernst, Einstein and Stern did not quantize the rotators. But they did explore the new zero- point energy that Max Planck had introduced in his “second quantum theory” in 1911. Einstein and Stern calculated the specific heat of hydrogen for two cases, one that assumed a zero-point energy for a rotator and one that did not.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physical Tourist Physics and New York City
    Phys. perspect. 5 (2003) 87–121 © Birkha¨user Verlag, Basel, 2003 1422–6944/05/010087–35 The Physical Tourist Physics and New York City Benjamin Bederson* I discuss the contributions of physicists who have lived and worked in New York City within the context of the high schools, colleges, universities, and other institutions with which they were and are associated. I close with a walking tour of major sites of interest in Manhattan. Key words: Thomas A. Edison; Nikola Tesla; Michael I. Pupin; Hall of Fame for GreatAmericans;AlbertEinstein;OttoStern;HenryGoldman;J.RobertOppenheimer; Richard P. Feynman; Julian Schwinger; Isidor I. Rabi; Bronx High School of Science; StuyvesantHighSchool;TownsendHarrisHighSchool;NewYorkAcademyofSciences; Andrei Sakharov; Fordham University; Victor F. Hess; Cooper Union; Peter Cooper; City University of New York; City College; Brooklyn College; Melba Phillips; Hunter College; Rosalyn Yalow; Queens College; Lehman College; New York University; Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences; Samuel F.B. Morse; John W. Draper; Columbia University; Polytechnic University; Manhattan Project; American Museum of Natural History; Rockefeller University; New York Public Library. Introduction When I was approached by the editors of Physics in Perspecti6e to prepare an article on New York City for The Physical Tourist section, I was happy to do so. I have been a New Yorker all my life, except for short-term stays elsewhere on sabbatical leaves and other visits. My professional life developed in New York, and I married and raised my family in New York and its environs. Accordingly, writing such an article seemed a natural thing to do. About halfway through its preparation, however, the attack on the World Trade Center took place.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman
    Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman Louis de Broglie Norman Ramsey Willis Lamb Otto Stern Werner Heisenberg Walther Gerlach Ernest Rutherford Satyendranath Bose Max Born Erwin Schrödinger Eugene Wigner Arnold Sommerfeld Julian Schwinger David Bohm Enrico Fermi Albert Einstein Where discovery meets practice Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology IQ ST in Baden-Württemberg . Introduction “But I do not wish to be forced into abandoning strict These two quotes by Albert Einstein not only express his well­ more securely, develop new types of computer or construct highly causality without having defended it quite differently known aversion to quantum theory, they also come from two quite accurate measuring equipment. than I have so far. The idea that an electron exposed to a different periods of his life. The first is from a letter dated 19 April Thus quantum theory extends beyond the field of physics into other 1924 to Max Born regarding the latter’s statistical interpretation of areas, e.g. mathematics, engineering, chemistry, and even biology. beam freely chooses the moment and direction in which quantum mechanics. The second is from Einstein’s last lecture as Let us look at a few examples which illustrate this. The field of crypt­ it wants to move is unbearable to me. If that is the case, part of a series of classes by the American physicist John Archibald ography uses number theory, which constitutes a subdiscipline of then I would rather be a cobbler or a casino employee Wheeler in 1954 at Princeton. pure mathematics. Producing a quantum computer with new types than a physicist.” The realization that, in the quantum world, objects only exist when of gates on the basis of the superposition principle from quantum they are measured – and this is what is behind the moon/mouse mechanics requires the involvement of engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • I. I. Rabi Papers [Finding Aid]. Library of Congress. [PDF Rendered Tue Apr
    I. I. Rabi Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 1992 Revised 2010 March Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms998009 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm89076467 Prepared by Joseph Sullivan with the assistance of Kathleen A. Kelly and John R. Monagle Collection Summary Title: I. I. Rabi Papers Span Dates: 1899-1989 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1945-1968) ID No.: MSS76467 Creator: Rabi, I. I. (Isador Isaac), 1898- Extent: 41,500 items ; 105 cartons plus 1 oversize plus 4 classified ; 42 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Physicist and educator. The collection documents Rabi's research in physics, particularly in the fields of radar and nuclear energy, leading to the development of lasers, atomic clocks, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to his 1944 Nobel Prize in physics; his work as a consultant to the atomic bomb project at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory and as an advisor on science policy to the United States government, the United Nations, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization during and after World War II; and his studies, research, and professorships in physics chiefly at Columbia University and also at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Otto Stern Annalen 4.11.11
    (To be published by Annalen der Physik in December 2011) Otto Stern (1888-1969): The founding father of experimental atomic physics J. Peter Toennies,1 Horst Schmidt-Böcking,2 Bretislav Friedrich,3 Julian C.A. Lower2 1Max-Planck-Institut für Dynamik und Selbstorganisation Bunsenstrasse 10, 37073 Göttingen 2Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe Universität Frankfurt Max-von-Laue-Strasse 1, 60438 Frankfurt 3Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Faradayweg 4-6, 14195 Berlin Keywords History of Science, Atomic Physics, Quantum Physics, Stern- Gerlach experiment, molecular beams, space quantization, magnetic dipole moments of nucleons, diffraction of matter waves, Nobel Prizes, University of Zurich, University of Frankfurt, University of Rostock, University of Hamburg, Carnegie Institute. We review the work and life of Otto Stern who developed the molecular beam technique and with its aid laid the foundations of experimental atomic physics. Among the key results of his research are: the experimental test of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of molecular velocities (1920), experimental demonstration of space quantization of angular momentum (1922), diffraction of matter waves comprised of atoms and molecules by crystals (1931) and the determination of the magnetic dipole moments of the proton and deuteron (1933). 1 Introduction Short lists of the pioneers of quantum mechanics featured in textbooks and historical accounts alike typically include the names of Max Planck, Albert Einstein, Arnold Sommerfeld, Niels Bohr, Max von Laue, Werner Heisenberg, Erwin Schrödinger, Paul Dirac, Max Born, and Wolfgang Pauli on the theory side, and of Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen, Ernest Rutherford, Arthur Compton, and James Franck on the experimental side. However, the records in the Archive of the Nobel Foundation as well as scientific correspondence, oral-history accounts and scientometric evidence suggest that at least one more name should be added to the list: that of the “experimenting theorist” Otto Stern.
    [Show full text]
  • Interleaved Excerpts from Interviews of Dudley Herschbach (DH) by John Rigden (JR) on May 21–22, 2003 and Bretislav Friedrich (BF) on March 5–9, 2012
    This article was downloaded by: [Harvard College] On: 30 August 2012, At: 22:23 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Molecular Physics: An International Journal at the Interface Between Chemistry and Physics Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tmph20 Interleaved excerpts from interviews of Dudley Herschbach (DH) by John Rigden (JR) on May 21–22, 2003 and Bretislav Friedrich (BF) on March 5–9, 2012 Version of record first published: 27 Jun 2012 To cite this article: (2012): Interleaved excerpts from interviews of Dudley Herschbach (DH) by John Rigden (JR) on May 21–22, 2003 and Bretislav Friedrich (BF) on March 5–9, 2012, Molecular Physics: An International Journal at the Interface Between Chemistry and Physics, 110:15-16, 1549-1590 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2012.698097 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review Hydrogen
    Book Review Hydrogen. The Essential Element by John S. Rigden (Harvard University Press, 2002) 280 pp, ISBN 0674007387, $28.00 Reviewed by Leverett J. Zompa Department of Chemistry University of Massachusetts Boston, MA 02125-3393 This book provides a view of the development of modern physics based upon fundamental research on hydrogen by experimental and theoretical physicists. John Rigden presents this seminal research of twentieth century physics in a clear and concise manner. At the same time, he weaves in the enticing historical events that began with early quantum theory and advanced to recent validations of quantum electrodynamics, weighing theory against extremely precise measurements of hydrogen atomic spectral parameters. The centrality of hydrogen to the studies of Balmer, Bohr, and Sommerfeld is carried through to the modern day research on Bose-Einstein condensates by Nobel Prize winners Cornell, Wieman, and Ketterle. The early chapters of the book will be quite familiar to chemists, as the struggles are described of early twentieth century physicists attempting to understand the nature of the hydrogen atom. The atomic structure of hydrogen provided by Niels Bohr and his idea of the quantized atom was grudgingly accepted by some because it could explain the data from the bright line spectrum of hydrogen. Some of the frustration felt by many physicists of the time is so aptly expressed by the quotation of Otto Stern (p. 39) who threatened to leave physics if “that crazy model of Bohr” turned out to be correct. Also described are the changes made to the Bohr model as more precise spectral data were obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the James Franck Papers 1882-1966
    University of Chicago Library Guide to the James Franck Papers 1882-1966 © 2006 University of Chicago Library Table of Contents Acknowledgments 3 Descriptive Summary 3 Information on Use 3 Access 3 Citation 3 Biographical Note 4 Scope Note 15 Related Resources 21 Subject Headings 21 INVENTORY 22 Series I: Correspondence 22 Series II: Manuscripts 51 Subseries 1: Physics - work in Germany and Denmark, 1905-1934 51 Subseries 2: Physics - work in United States, 1935-1958 53 Subseries 3: Biophysics - work on Photosynthesis at Johns Hopkins, 1935-193855 Subseries 4: Biophysics - work on Photosynthesis at the University of Chicago,55 1938-48 Subseries 5: Biophysics - work on Photosynthesis after 1948 55 Subseries 6: General Articles and Talks on Science 71 Subseries 7: Papers by other scientists 72 Subseries 8: Notes, memoranda and fragments 76 Subseries 9: Atomic Scientists' Movement, 1944-1953 76 Subseries 10: Franck Memorial Symposium, May 12-13, 1966 79 Series III: Tape Recordings and Photographs 80 Subseries 1: Tape recordings 80 Subseries 2: Hertha Sponer's photograph album, Göttingen, 1920-1933 80 Series IV: Personal Documents and Memorabilia 90 Subseries 1: Documents 90 Subseries 2: Clippings 93 Subseries 3: Biographies and Obituaries 94 Subseries 4: Memorabilia; Scrolls, Certificates, Medals, Mementos 96 Series V: Robert Platzman's Editorial Papers for the "Selected Works of James98 Franck" Series VI: Addenda 103 Subseries 1: Correspondence between James Franck and his nephew and Dr. Heinz104 Kallman Subseries 2: Oversize 105 Descriptive Summary Identifier ICU.SPCL.FRANCK Title Franck, James. Papers Date 1882-1966 Size 20.5 linear feet (29 boxes) Repository Special Collections Research Center University of Chicago Library 1100 East 57th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Otto Stern Annalen 22.9.11
    September 22, 2011 Otto Stern (1888-1969): The founding father of experimental atomic physics J. Peter Toennies,1 Horst Schmidt-Böcking,2 Bretislav Friedrich,3 Julian C.A. Lower2 1Max-Planck-Institut für Dynamik und Selbstorganisation Bunsenstrasse 10, 37073 Göttingen 2Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe Universität Frankfurt Max-von-Laue-Strasse 1, 60438 Frankfurt 3Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Faradayweg 4-6, 14195 Berlin Keywords History of Science, Atomic Physics, Quantum Physics, Stern- Gerlach experiment, molecular beams, space quantization, magnetic dipole moments of nucleons, diffraction of matter waves, Nobel Prizes, University of Zurich, University of Frankfurt, University of Rostock, University of Hamburg, Carnegie Institute. We review the work and life of Otto Stern who developed the molecular beam technique and with its aid laid the foundations of experimental atomic physics. Among the key results of his research are: the experimental determination of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of molecular velocities (1920), experimental demonstration of space quantization of angular momentum (1922), diffraction of matter waves comprised of atoms and molecules by crystals (1931) and the determination of the magnetic dipole moments of the proton and deuteron (1933). 1 Introduction Short lists of the pioneers of quantum mechanics featured in textbooks and historical accounts alike typically include the names of Max Planck, Albert Einstein, Arnold Sommerfeld, Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Erwin Schrödinger, Paul Dirac, Max Born, and Wolfgang Pauli on the theory side, and of Konrad Röntgen, Ernest Rutherford, Max von Laue, Arthur Compton, and James Franck on the experimental side. However, the records in the Archive of the Nobel Foundation as well as scientific correspondence, oral-history accounts and scientometric evidence suggest that at least one more name should be added to the list: that of the “experimenting theorist” Otto Stern.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Freedom and Faculty Careers: a Case Study of Four Nobel Laureate Exiles, 1930-1940
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1995 Academic freedom and faculty careers: A case study of four Nobel laureate exiles, 1930-1940 Timothy Dale Norton College of William & Mary - School of Education Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, Higher Education Commons, and the Other Education Commons Recommended Citation Norton, Timothy Dale, "Academic freedom and faculty careers: A case study of four Nobel laureate exiles, 1930-1940" (1995). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539618387. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.25774/w4-tsav-h255 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced frommicrofilm the master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. Hie quality of this reproduction Is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Many Walks of Magnetic Resonance Past, Present and Beyond
    The Many Walks of Magnetic Resonance Past, Present and Beyond Stanislav Sýkora www.ebyte.it Presented at University of Cantabria in Santander (Spain), November 10, 2010 (DOI: 10.3247/sl3nmr10.005 ) In essence, what is Magnetic Resonace In my opinion, Magnetic Resonance is a way to observe and manipulate particles with spin and magnetic moment and, in practical terms, one of the most important Physics developments of 20-th Century , just after Quantum Physics itself Without MR there would be no modern Chemistry, Biochemistry and Farmaceutics, and only severely mutilated Medical Diagnostics Examples ? Note: Originally, the following nine slides formed a sigle-slide, animated sequence Time-domain NMR Example of a direct analysis of the FID shape: measuring the solid/liquid ratio. Stelar Spinmaster, 1984. Spectroscopy with its amazing resolution Larmor frequency: 600 MHz, linewidth: 0.08 Hz CHCl 3 in CO(CD 3)2 1H spectrum 35 37 13 CHCl peaks Cl and Cl 3 isotopomers resolved ! Sample rotation sidebands 1D FT Spectroscopy in Chemistry Spectroscopy of 13 C (and other nuclides) Multi-dimensional FT Spectroscopy methods Dynamic NMR (kinetics and diffusion) NMR Relaxometry: a 1H NMRD profile 1 H longitudinal relaxation rate R = 1/T 1 of solid, anhydrous Bovine Serum Albumine (BSA) as a function of magnetic field strength (measured in terms of Larmor frequency). See www.ebyte.it/stan/Poster_NmrdOfSolidBsa.html MR Imaging (MRI) MRI atlas MR angiography Male pelvis Functional MRI Examples taken at random from various websites Can all this have a simple common basis (Yes: Spin and Magnetic moment ) The many kinds of Magnetic Resonance … NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ( 1H, 2D, 13 C, 31 P, 19 F, …) EMR Electron Magnetic Resonance (alias EPR or ESR) µµµMR Muon Magnetic Resonance NQR Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance FMR Ferro (anti-ferro) Magnetic Resonance MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging MRFM Magnetic Resonance Force Microscopy etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Walther Nernst, Albert Einstein, Otto Stern, Adriaan Fokker, and The
    Walther Nernst, Albert Einstein, Otto Stern, Adriaan Fokker, and the Rotational Specific Heat of Hydrogen Clayton Gearhart St. John’s University (Minnesota) Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte Berlin July 2007 1 Rotational Specific Heat of Hydrogen: Widely investigated in the old quantum theory Nernst Lorentz Eucken Einstein Ehrenfest Bohr Planck Reiche Kemble Tolman Schrödinger Van Vleck Some of the more prominent physicists and physical chemists who worked on the specific heat of hydrogen through the mid-1920s. See “The Rotational Specific Heat of Molecular Hydrogen in the Old Quantum Theory” http://faculty.csbsju.edu/cgearhart/pubs/sel_pubs.htm (slide show) 2 Rigid Rotator (Rotating dumbbell) •The rigid rotator was among the earliest problems taken up in the old (pre-1925) quantum theory. • Applications: Molecular spectra, and rotational contri- bution to the specific heat of molecular hydrogen • The problem should have been simple Molecular • relatively uncomplicated theory spectra • only one adjustable parameter (moment of inertia) • Nevertheless, no satisfactory theoretical description of the specific heat of hydrogen emerged in the old quantum theory Our story begins with 3 Nernst’s Heat Theorem Walther Nernst 1864 – 1941 • physical chemist • studied with Boltzmann • 1889: lecturer, then professor at Göttingen • 1905: professor at Berlin Nernst formulated his heat theorem (Third Law) in 1906, shortly after appointment as professor in Berlin. 4 Nernst’s Heat Theorem and Quantum Theory • Initially, had nothing to do with quantum theory. • Understand the equilibrium point of chemical reactions. • Nernst’s theorem had implications for specific heats at low temperatures. • 1906–1910: Nernst and his students undertook extensive measurements of specific heats of solids at low (down to liquid hydrogen) temperatures.
    [Show full text]