Deanery Synod Representation for Bishop's Mission Order Initiatives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Deanery Synod Representation for Bishop's Mission Order Initiatives Deanery Synod Representation for Bishop’s Mission Order Initiatives GUIDANCE AND PRO-FORMAS The following documents are attached: • Points Arising on Issues & Advice provided • Annex I List of BMO Mission Initiatives in the Diocese • Annex II Linked Parish/Mission Initiative model – notes on framework (i.e. where no Scheme of Representation on a deanery synod is required) • Annex III Linked Parish/Mission Initiative: Draft Protocol • Annex IV Steps required to start a Scheme of Representation on a deanery synod of a BMO Initiative • Annex V Draft Scheme for Representation on a deanery synod of a BMO Mission Initiative Bishop’s Mission Orders and the Church Representation Rules 1) Points Arising on Issues: Meeting at Winckworth Sherwood (22 May 2013) 2) Considered Advice: Meeting at Winckworth Sherwood (27 June 2013) Present: Paul Morris, Monica Bolley, John Bevan Page 1 of 17 Background 1. The Bishop of London has made a number of Bishop’s Mission Order’s, (BMO) most of which are covering projects that were existing church plants of one kind or another. Some are other forms of mission initiative (MI). 2. A BMO is made for a 5 year term. There is provision for a second term and thereafter for a BMO to be made without specified time so that it continues without having to be re-made. BMO’s may be wound up after a period of operation. 3. The National Church Institutions (NCI) pro forma BMO has a section relating to Synodical representation, which has been used in the BMO documents for most London cases. 4. One London BMO case does not have Synodical representation provision (presumably the project did not envisage using it). 5. However, some of the projects with BMO provision have a particular interest in arranging representation to Deanery Synods. Triennial Synodical Election Round 6. The Electoral Roll figures presented at the 2013 Annual Parochial Church Meetings will be used in the calculations to determine the Scales of representation on the deanery synods for the forthcoming triennium. The agreed Scales are then applied to the Electoral Roll figures, to determine the number of representatives to be elected to the deanery synods from each parish. (Existing BMO initiatives are not part of the Electoral Roll calculation, though they are requested to maintain equivalent Electoral Rolls.) The NCI BMO Pro Forma content for Representation on Deanery Synod 7. The Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 provision does not extend to allow representation on Deanery Synod simply to be written in to the BMO itself. The wording of the BMO pro forma instead proposes a Church Representation Rules (CRR) scheme is taken forward for the MI concerned. 8. The BMO pro forma offers alternative forms; for cases in which a CRR scheme has already been done (not in any London case so far); and an alternative, for use in cases where a CRR scheme may be done in the future. 9. The BMO pro forma text is facilitative, rather than directive. The form of words is :- [11.1 The persons to whom this Order relates and who are specified in the scheme made by the diocesan synod of the Diocese on [date ] pursuant to rule 27A of the Church Representation Rules shall be represented on the deanery synod of the [ ] deanery in accordance with and as provided for by that scheme. Or [11.1 If and when a scheme is made by the diocesan synod of the Diocese pursuant to rule 27A of the Church Representation Rules for the representation on a deanery synod of persons to whom this Order relates and who are specified in the scheme, those persons Page 2 of 17 shall be represented on that deanery synod in accordance with and as provided for by that scheme. 10. A list of London BMO cases is attached as Annex I. Making a CRR Scheme 11. Section 27A of the CRR states:- (1) Any diocesan synod may, at the request of the bishop or bishops who has or have made a bishop’s mission order under section 47 of the Dioceses, Pastoral and Mission Measure 2007* which is in force, provide by scheme for representation on such deanery synod as may be determined by or under the scheme of such persons to whom the order relates as may be specified in or under the scheme. (2) The provisions of rule 26(2) shall apply to schemes made under this rule. *Now superseded by the Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 12. Section 26(2) of the CRR states :- Copies of every such scheme must be sent to members of the diocesan synod at least fourteen days before the session at which they are considered, and every such scheme shall require the assent of the house of Bishops and of a two-thirds majority of the members of each of the other houses of the synod present and voting. Issues of principle 13. Is a CRR Scheme or a Mission and Pastoral Measure scheme to create a new parish/ benefice to be preferred for established church plant cases? Long standing church plant BMO’s may be grounded in a particular area, and it could be that, if they are successful and perhaps self sustaining, their future development would be to become a new parish (and/or benefice). In such a case would it be preferable to proceed straight to the Pastoral Measure process to create a new benefice/ parish? Advice • A BMO is designed to be established for a set time and may be renewed or terminated. Major tests met in the life of a BMO MI will concern sustainability, succession in the role of leader and the evolution of the vision and direction of the initiative. A pastoral scheme effects a permanent change (though it may be altered by a further scheme). In deciding whether a pastoral scheme should be pursued, informed judgements need to be made as to strategic desirability. In consequence, even for an existing church plant, for which a BMO is proposed, it would be inappropriate to proceed to a Pastoral Scheme process prior to the resolution of the issues of sustainability, succession and vision for the initiative, pending which the BMO is the more appropriate vehicle. Issues of practice 14. Would it be appropriate for a MI to make informal arrangements for Deanery Synod representation by an understanding with the parish in which the Initiative works, that one person from the MI (who would also be on the Electoral Roll of the parish) being nominated, so that they may be elected as a parish representative on Deanery Synod? Page 3 of 17 Advice • In May 2013, this point was considered at a meeting about a particular case. A note of the meeting is attached as Annex II. • A draft protocol for parish and MI working together, including an agreement to explore informal representation, is attached as Annex III. 15. How to decide to start a CRR Scheme. The MI governed by the BMO requests the Archdeacon concerned to take forward proposals for representation by a CRR Scheme to Area Council. Following consultation of the Area Council and the Bishop’s Council, a draft scheme may be prepared and despatched to diocesan synod members as section 26(2) of the CRR sets out. Advice • It is recommended that a form is provided to enable a BMO MI to request an Archdeacon to take forward to Area Council a proposal that a CRR Scheme is drawn up. • A draft form is attached as Annex IV • The Archdeacon consults the Area Council about proposed CRR representation. • The Archdeacon takes forward referral to the Bishop’s Council for consultation prior to a CRR Scheme submission to the Diocesan Synod. • The Archdeacon to ascertain whether the Bishop of London is minded to take forward a CRR scheme submission to Synod and advises the Synodical Secretary accordingly. 16. Should there be a composite scheme for long standing cases? Many of the BMO’s are for MI’s that have been running for some time. Would it be possible to draft a composite scheme to cover a number of MI’s, or is it preferable to draft individual schemes? Advice • A composite scheme is not appropriate. It is preferable to take forward individual schemes. 17. Would it be possible to draft CRR schemes for representation for the BMO MI’s so that their representation on the current Deanery Synods is in addition to that presented by the current triennial electoral process and calculation? (The point at issue is that the CRRs require the use of Electoral Rolls in existence at 3 yearly intervals). Advice • No. This would run counter to the provision of the CRR. 18. Should we draft CRR schemes for additional representation for BMO MI’s on the same basis as the current, existing diocesan scales of representation? Advice • No. This too would run counter to the provision of the CRR. 19. If it is not possible to draft CRR schemes for additional representation for BMO MI’s in a current triennium, do we draft simply to allow a particular BMO MI to be included in the forthcoming calculation for the next triennium and for representation in that triennium? Advice Page 4 of 17 • This is the appropriate way forward. The scheme would provide for the inclusion of the particular BMO MI (in accordance with the provisions of section 25(2) of the CRR process) in the year prior to an election (which establishes the basis for the calculation of representation). (The effect is to include the BMO’s equivalent of an electoral roll in the calculation so the BMO MI is represented in the coming triennium.) 20.
Recommended publications
  • Working Group on Human Sexuality
    IssuesTEXTwithoutPreface.qxp:Resourcbishops.qxp 20/11/2013 11:35 Page i The House of Bishops Working Group on human sexuality Published in book & ebook formats by Church House Publishing Available now from www.chpublishing.co.uk IssuesTEXTwithoutPreface.qxp:Resourcbishops.qxp 20/11/2013 11:35 Page ii Published in book & ebook formats by Church House Publishing Available now from www.chpublishing.co.uk IssuesTEXTwithoutPreface.qxp:Resourcbishops.qxp 20/11/2013 11:35 Page iii Report of the House of Bishops Working Group on human sexuality November 2013 Published in book & ebook formats by Church House Publishing Available now from www.chpublishing.co.uk IssuesTEXTwithoutPreface.qxp:Resourcbishops.qxp 20/11/2013 11:35 Page iv Church House Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this Church House publication may be reproduced or Great Smith Street stored or transmitted by any means London or in any form, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, SW1P 3AZ recording, or any information storage and retrieval system without written permission, which should be sought ISBN 978 0 7151 4437 4 (Paperback) from [email protected] 978 0 7151 4438 1 (CoreSource EBook) 978 0 7151 4439 8 (Kindle EBook) Unless otherwise indicated, the Scripture quotations contained GS 1929 herein are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright Published 2013 for the House © 1989, by the Division of Christian of Bishops of the General Synod Education of the National Council of the Church of England by Church of the Churches of Christ in the
    [Show full text]
  • This 2008 Letter
    The Most Reverend and Right Hon the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury & The Most Reverend and Right Hon the Lord Archbishop of York July, 2008 Most Reverend Fathers in God, We write as bishops, priests and deacons of the Provinces of Canterbury and York, who have sought, by God’s grace, in our various ministries, to celebrate the Sacraments and preach the Word faithfully; to form, nurture and catechise new Christians; to pastor the people of God entrusted to our care; and, through the work of our dioceses, parishes and institutions, to build up the Kingdom and to further God’s mission to the world in this land. Our theological convictions, grounded in obedience to Scripture and Tradition, and attentive to the need to discern the mind of the whole Church Catholic in matters touching on Faith and Order, lead us to doubt the sacramental ministry of those women ordained to the priesthood by the Church of England since 1994. Having said that, we have engaged with the life of the Church of England in a myriad of ways, nationally and locally, and have made sincere efforts to work courteously and carefully with those with whom we disagree. In the midst of this disagreement over Holy Order, we have, we believe, borne particular witness to the cause of Christian unity, and to the imperative of Our Lord’s command that ‘all may be one.’ We include those who have given many years service to the Church in the ordained ministry, and others who are very newly ordained. We believe that we demonstrate the vitality of the tradition which we represent and which has formed us in our discipleship and ministry – a tradition which, we believe, constitutes an essential and invaluable part of the life and character of the Church of England, without which it would be deeply impoverished.
    [Show full text]
  • The House of Bishops of the Church of England Has Today Welcomed Eight Women As Participant Observers to Its Meetings
    The House of Bishops of the Church of England has today welcomed eight women as participant observers to its meetings. The welcome follows the election of the eight senior women clergy from regions across the country. In February of this year the House decided that until such time as there are six female members of the House, following the admission of women to the episcopate, a number of senior women clergy should be given the right to attend and speak at meetings of the House as participant observers. The necessary change to the House's Standing Orders was made in May. Elections for the eight senior women clergy were held in autumn of this year and the following were elected: • East Midlands - Ven Christine Wilson, Archdeacon of Chesterfield • West Midlands - Revd Preb. Dr Jane Tillier, Preb of Lichfield Cathedral • East Anglia - Ven Annette Cooper, Archdeacon of Colchester • South and Central - Ven Joanne Grenfell, Archdeacon of Portsdown • South East region - Ven Rachel Treweek, Archdeacon of Hackney • South West region - Ven Nicola Sullivan, Archdeacon of Wells • North East Very Revd Vivienne Faull, Dean of York • North West - The Rev Libby Lane, Dean of Women in Ministry, Chester Diocese Having taken up their role on 1st December, the two day meeting of the House of Bishops in York on December 9-10 will be the first meeting at which the participant observers will attend. ENDS Source URL: https://www.churchofengland.org/news-and-media/news-and-statements/bishops-welcome-participant-observers-first-meeting Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHBISHOPS' TASK GROUP on EVANGELISM Membership the Archbishop of Canterbury (Chair) the Bishop of Liverpool the Bishop of La
    ARCHBISHOPS’ TASK GROUP ON EVANGELISM Membership The Archbishop of Canterbury (Chair) The Bishop of Liverpool The Bishop of Lancaster Mrs Amy Orr-Ewing The Revd Andy Croft The Revd Annie Kirke Mrs Beth Keith The Revd Liz Adekunle The Revd Canon Dr Jules Gomes Canon Mark Russell The Bishop of Hertford The Bishop of Burnley The Revd Rico Tice The Revd Al Gordon The Revd Malcolm Mcnaughton Terms of Reference Purpose The purpose of the task group will be: To hold the vision and priority of evangelism before every part of the Church of England to deepen the prayer life of the Church and promote intentional prayer for the work of making new disciples at every level of church life To research, co-ordinate and encourage the many different initiatives which are helping to take this vision forward To propose new initiatives to further this aim To act as a channel for resources to support those initiatives which are bearing fruit To enable the Church of England to work in ecumenical partnership in evangelism wherever possible Membership: The Archbishop of Canterbury The Archbishop of York Up to ten members appointed by the Archbishops following nominations from the Archbishops Council and the House of Bishops Standing Committee. The membership of the Task Group should contain the different skills required to undertake the task and reflect the diversity of tradition, age, gender and ethnicity across the Church of England. Working Groups The Task Group shall have the power to establish focussed working groups to engage with different aspects of its agenda. Frequency of meetings and duration The Task Group shall meet between four and six times per year in the first two years and thereafter be subject to annual review.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Martin's Monthly
    St. Martin’s Monthly May 2015 50p Details of the following and much more can be found inside Recital for Ascension (see page 5) Rogation (see page 6) Whitsun (see page 8) St Martin’s Foundation programme (see pages 14 & 15) St Martin’s Church, Hale Gardens, Acton W3 9SQ (Registered charity no. 1132976) www.stmartinswestacton.co.uk Email: [email protected] Vicar The Revd Dr Nicholas Henderson (also Chaplain to Acton Care Centre) 020 8992 2333 Commissioned Lay Minister to Japanese Anglican Church UK Mrs Yuki Johnson (07572 324107) [email protected] Parish Administrator (9.30am – 1.30pm weekdays) Parish Office, rear of Church Hall, Hale Gardens, W3 9SQ 020 8992 2333 Reader Dr Margaret Jones (020 8997 1418) Reader Emeritus Mrs Lynne Armstrong (020 8992 8341) Licensed Lay Minister Mrs Jacqueline Nicholls (c/o Parish Office) Churchwardens Mrs Liza Ambridge (020 8992 3029) Mr John Trussler (020 8992 4549) Deputy Churchwarden Mr John Wilson (c/o Parish Office) Director of Music Mr Kenneth Bartram (c/o Parish Office) Magazine Editor Mr Clive Davis ([email protected]) The Vicar is available for consultation and enquiries by appointment. Please ring the Parish Office. Articles for the next month’s magazine should be sent to Clive Davis (email: [email protected]) They should reach the Editor by 17th May. The June magazine will be on sale by 30th May. The Merry Month of May It will hardly have escaped your attention that we have a General Election on Thursday 7th May. As I write this article in April the campaigning seems already to have been going on interminably.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Results from the Elections for Female Representatives to Attend the House of Bishops Have Been Announced
    Further results from the elections for female representatives to attend the House of Bishops have been announced. At its meeting of 7 February 2013 the House of Bishops decided that eight senior women clergy, elected regionally, will participate in all meetings of the House until such time as there are six female Bishops who will sit as of right. The latest four elected members are: • East Midlands region - Ven Christine Wilson, Archdeacon of Chesterfield • West Midlands region - Revd Preb. Dr Jane Tillier, Preb of Lichfield Cathedral • East Anglia region - Ven Annette Cooper, Archdeacon of Colchester • South and Central region - Ven Joanne Grenfell, Archdeacon of Portsdown This follows a previous announcement of the first three female representatives on the 26th September. • South West region - Ven Nicola Sullivan, Archdeacon of Wells • North East region - Very Revd Vivienne Faull, Dean of York • South East region - Ven Rachel Treweek, Archdeacon of Hackney The representatives will take up their roles on 1st December. Notes The result for the election in the North West region is expected to be announced before the end of October. The rules relating to the election of the regional representatives can be found here: http://www.churchofengland.org/media/1784044/2013%20rules%20under%20so12.pdf More information on the role and work of the House of Bishops can be found here: http://www.churchofengland.org/about-us/structure/general-synod/about-general-synod/house-of-bishops.aspx Source URL: https://www.churchofengland.org/news-and-media/news-and-statements/four-more-female-representatives-house-bishops-elected Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • CHURCHYARD of CHRIST CHURCH SPITALFIELDS And
    Before: Chancellor June Rodgers, sitting as a Deputy Chancellor of the Diocese of London IN THE CONSISTORY COURT OF THE DIOCESE OF LONDON IN THE MATTER OF A BUILDING IN THE CHURCHYARD OF CHRIST CHURCH SPITALFIELDS and IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A RESTORATION ORDER AND A PETITION FOR A CONFIRMATORY FACULTY B E T W E E N:- (1)The Governing Body of Christ Church School (2) The Rev’d. Mr. Andrew Rider Kim Gooding, Will Spring and Richard Wasserfall (Rector, Church Wardens and former Church Warden) (3) The London Diocesan Board for Schools (4) The London Borough of Tower Hamlets (Building Parties) Applicants for a Confirmatory Faculty & Respondents to the Application for a Restoration Order and (1) Spitalfields Open Space ( S.O.S.) (2) Christine Whaite (Open Space Parties) (3) Professor Kerry Downes (4) and others Applicants for a Restoration Order & Respondents to the Application for a Confirmatory Faculty 1 JUDGMENT I DIRECT THAT PURSUANT TO CPR PD 39A PARA 6.1 NO OFFICIAL SHORTHAND NOTE SHALL BE TAKEN OF THIS JUDGMENT AND THAT COPIES OF THIS VERSION AS HANDED DOWN MAY BE TREATED AS AUTHENTIC 1. For a church not yet 300 years old Christ Church Spitalfields has had a chequered history. The church lies just outside the boundary of the City of London in the Borough of Tower Hamlets, the Council of which is one of the Parties in this case. The church is situated to the east of Liverpool Street Station, and to the west of Brick Lane. To-day, it stands on the boundary between the expanding office blocks of the City, and the curry houses of the Muslim community of the Spitalfields/Bangla Town Ward of Tower Hamlets.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Fund 2021
    COMMON FUND 2021 Doing everything we can to support the mission and growth of the church in London THANK YOU REFLECTIONS ON THE COMMON FUND The Common Fund is money given by every parish in London to enable, support and further the work across “The generosity of all “We give above our the Diocese. For Common Fund purposes, in 2021 in churches enables own costs as a view of the ongoing level of uncertainty, we are again us to support the way of sharing our using the 2020 Parish Standard Cost figures. ministry and growth financial strength of the church in with less wealthy Your support • Fund the costs of the areas we might not neighbours. allows us to: clergy in your parish. otherwise be able ” • Invest in mission to reach. opportunities, both in “We are very grateful existing parishes and new ” to others who worshipping communities. “This model of support us and • Sustain and grow Christian common fellowship share in our ministry work and worship in every allows us to do more in this area. Without community. together than we realising it, they are could do alone. touching lives 2020 has been an exceptionally difficult year for us ” right here. all as we have together responded to the Covid-19 pandemic. PCCs have faced challenges on many fronts ” including organising worship, serving our communities, and managing parish finances. The Diocese of London “Common Fund is “ Common Fund is an is extremely grateful to all parishes for their ongoing the embodiment of a expression of love. generosity in supporting the work of our ministry generous spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Martin's Monthly
    St. Martin’s Monthly February 2014 50p PPrreesseennttaattiioonn ooff CChhrriisstt iinn tthhee TTeemmppllee CChhuurrcchh ooff OOuurr LLaaddyy,,, MMeecchheellleenn,,, BBeelllggiiiuumm St Martin’s Church, Hale Gardens, Acton W3 9SQ (Registered charity no. 1132976) www.stmartinswestacton.co.uk www.stmartinswestacton.com Email: [email protected] Skype: smartins.westacton Vicar The Revd Dr Nicholas Henderson (also Chaplain to Acton Care Centre) 020 8992 2333 SS Associate Priest The Revd Bruce Barnett-Cowan 020 8896 3065 Assistant Priest The Revd Canon Dr Alyson Barnett-Cowan Commissioned Lay Minister to the Japanese Anglican Church UK Mrs Yuki Johnson (07572 324107) [email protected] Parish Secretary (9.30am – 1.30pm weekdays) Parish Office, 25 Birch Grove, W3 9SP 020 8992 2333 (Fax: 020 8932 1951) Reader Dr Margaret Jones (020 8997 1418) Reader Emeritus Mrs Lynne Armstrong (020 8992 8341) Churchwardens Lisa Ambridge (020 8992 3029) John Trussler (020 8992 4549) Director of Music Kenneth Bartram (c/o Parishes Office) Magazine Editor Clive Davis ([email protected]) The Vicar is available for consultation and enquiries by appointment. Please ring the Parish Office. Articles for the next month’s magazine should be sent to Clive Davis (email: [email protected]) They should reach the Editor by 9th February. The March magazine will be on sale by 23rd February. Come Candlemas … When I was young (a very long time ago now) Candlemas was unknown or at best confined to an obscure liturgical corner as the old Book of Common Prayer’s ‘Purification of St Mary’ and as a legal quarter day in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Proceedings 2012 General Synod November Group of Sessions
    Report of Proceedings 2012 General Synod November Group of Sessions Volume 43 No. 3 Officers of the General Synod Presidents The Archbishop of Canterbury The Archbishop of York Prolocutors of the Lower Houses of the Convocations Canterbury York Ven. Christine Hardman Revd Canon Glyn Webster The House of Laity Chair Vice-Chair Dr Philip Giddings Mr Tim Hind Secretary General Mr William Fittall Clerk to the Synod Chief Legal Adviser and Registrar Dr Colin Podmore Mr Stephen Slack Administrative Secretary to the House of Bishops Standing Counsel Mr Ross Gillson Sir Anthony Hammond KCB QC Secretary to the House of Clergy Deputy Legal Adviser Mr Jonathan Neil-Smith Revd Alexander McGregor Secretary to the House of Laity Mr Nicholas Hills Officers of the Convocations Synodical Secretary of the Convocation of Canterbury Registrar Revd Stephen Trott Mr Stephen Slack Synodal Secretary of the Convocation of York Registrar Ven. Alan Wolstencroft Mr Lionel Lennox Contents Full Synod: First Day Monday 19 November 2012 Introductions 1 Progress of Measures and Statutory Instruments 1 Report by the Business Committee 2 Anglican Consultative Council Meeting 8 Draft Act of Synod Adopting the Anglican Communion Covenant 18 Questions 33 Second Day Tuesday 20 November 2012 Legislative Business: Draft Bishops and Priests (Consecration of Women) Measure and Draft Amending Canon No. 30 81 Third Day Wednesday 21 November 2012 Presidential Statement 157 Diocesan Synod Motion: Amendment to Canon B12 and Regulations 160 Private Member’s Motion: Living Wage 177 Dates of Groups of Sessions in 2013 194 Farewells 200 Youth Unemployment 205 Farewell to the Archbishop of Canterbury 227 Index 239 i Full Synod: First Day Monday 19 November 2012 THE CHAIR The Archbishop of Canterbury (Dr Rowan Williams) took the Chair at 2.15 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE Board
    October-November 2014 NOTICE board Kelvedon Hatch has best kept churchyard HOW green is your churchyard? The Month editor Jon Longman and his camera followed in the footsteps of the judges of the Rural Community Council of Essex’s Best Kept Churchyard competition 2014.They awarded marks for eco-friendly policies encouraging wildlife, good management and tidiness. The results of the RCCE Best Kept Churchyard Competition 2014, sponsored by Lodge & Sons (Builders) Ltd., Stebbing, and Essex Biodiversity Project (Essex Wildlife Trust), are: l Winner: St Nicholas, Kelvedon Hatch (top left). l Second prize: St Stephen, Cold Norton (middle left). l Third prize: St Andrew, Wormingford (bottom left). l A highly-commended certificate was awarded to St Mary and St Christopher, Panfield (right), the 2013 winner. l For winners of the RCCE Essex Village of the Year and Best Kept VillageFEC competitions, XMAS FLYER see A5 www.essexrcc.org.uk/Competitions.aspx 0714_. 06/06/2014 07:37 Page 1 FRIENDS OF ESSEX CHURCHES TRUST Supporting Christian Churches & Chapels in Essex & East London Christmas Card 2014 (135mm x 135mm) This will be available at our Christmas Fair on October 15th or by post Stained glass panels by Morris & Co, 1882, designed by Sir Edward Burne-Jones. By kind permission of St. Peter’s Church, Ugley, Essex. Greeting inside: With Best Wishes for Christmas and the New Year ✁ ORDER FORM Cards come in packs of 12 (4 of each design) at £5.00 per pack. Postage and packing - £2.20 (per 1 pack), £3.50 (2-5 packs) £5.50 (6+ packs) Number Required I enclose a cheque made out to: The Friends of Essex Churches Events Committee for: £ ____________________to include P&P Please send with your name and address to: Catharine Hutley, Camsix Farm, Hartford End, Chelmsford, Essex CM3 1JS.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission-Shaped Church 10/12/03 9:10 Am Page I
    Mission-shaped church 10/12/03 9:10 am Page i mission-shaped church Mission-shaped church 10/12/03 9:10 am Page ii Church House Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be Church House reproduced or stored or transmitted by any means Great Smith Street or in any form, electronic or mechanical, including London SW1P 3NZ photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system without written permission which should be sought from the Copyright ISBN 0 7151 4013 2 Administrator, Church House Publishing, Church House, Great Smith Street, London SW1P 3NZ Published 2004 by Church House Publishing Tel: 020 7898 1594; Fax: 020 7898 1449; Email: [email protected]. Copyright © The Archbishops’ Council 2004 Unless stated otherwise, Bible quotations are from Index copyright © Meg Davies 2004 the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible copyright © 1989 by the Division of Christian GS 1523 Education of the National Council of the Churches in the USA. All rights reserved. Cover design by Church House Publishing This report has only the authority of the Council that Typeset in 10/12 Franklin Gothic approved it. Printed in England by The Cromwell Press Ltd Trowbridge, Wiltshire Mission-shaped church 10/12/03 9:10 am Page iii mission-shaped church church planting and fresh expressions of church in a changing context Mission-shaped church 10/12/03 9:10 am Page iv Mission-shaped church 10/12/03 9:10 am Page v contents foreword by the Archbishop of Canterbury vii the Mission-shaped Church working group ix a note
    [Show full text]