DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 6 Technical Assistance to Sra on Environmental Issues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CHAPTER 6 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO SRA ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Preparatory Survey on the Project for Construction of Mykolaiv Bridge in Ukraine Final Report 6. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO SRA ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 6.1 Environmental and Social Considerations 6.1.1 Project Components (1) Name The Project for Construction of Mykolaiv Bridge in Ukraine (2) Project Proponent The State Road Administration of Mykolaiv in Ukraine (Ukravtodor Mykolaiv) (3) Project Object The aim of the planned activity is to construct a highway river crossing over the Southern Bug River of city Mykolaiv cit;y. A highway river crossing including the bridge and approaches to it on the road M-14 Odessa – Melitopol – Novoazovsk (to Taganrog): beginning on the right bank of the Southern Bug River near the village Vesniane from M-14; end – on the left bank to the M-14 at the crossing with auto road P-06 Ulianovka – Mykolaiv. Construction of approaches to the bridge structures requires allocation of land for permanent use within the projected band allocation of the road. At present these lands are owned by individuals and legal entities. (4) Location Ukraine is located in Eastern Europe and is surrounded by seven countries; Romania, Moldova, Slovakia, Hungary, and Poland in the west, Belarus in the north, and Russia in the east, as well as the Black Sea in the south. In order to exploit this geographical position, the Government of Ukraine established the “Comprehensive Program for Consolidation of Ukraine as a Transit Country for 2002-2010”, which was indicative of the importance attached to establishing international trunk roads providing new traffic systems for cross-border logistics. The current trunk road development plan in Ukraine is based on this Program. The project site is shown in Figure 6.1.1. 6-1 Project Location Map Russia Baltic Sea Legend Belarus Moscow Poland Minsk Route No. Main Highway Warsaw KIEV Major City Ukraine Romania Capital Bucharest Black Sea Ankara Belarus Turkey Poland Russia M06 Kiev(Capital) M03 M12 M03 Ukraine M04 M05 M13 Mykolaiv M14 Moldova M14 Romania Odessa M15 M18 Project Site Black Sea Figure 6.1.1 Project Site Location of project roads and Bridge section is shown in Fig 6.1.2. Source：JICA Survey Team Figure 6.1.2 Location of the Road (M-14 Bypass Road) 6-2 Preparatory Survey on the Project for Construction of Mykolaiv Bridge in Ukraine Final Report (5) Project Components and Estimated Construction Cost Project components and estimated cost are as follows. Left bank ······················ PK 0 - PK 95+70 ============== 9.57km Bridge section ················ PK 95+70-PK116+20 =========== 2.05km Right bank····················· PK 116+20 - PK131+92.987 ====== 1.57km Construction cost············· Refers to Table 9.3.1 Result of Cost Estimation. (6) Technical and Economical Justification for the Construction The road M-14 is one of the most important trunk roads in the Ukraine, connecting the western border (with Romania and Moldova) and the eastern border (with Russia) through cities in southern Ukraine, such as Odessa and Mykolaiv. M-14 is also a part of the international corridor of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC). However M-14 suffers serious traffic jams because of the number of heavy vehicles, even transit cargo, that must pass through the downtown of Mykolaiv city and negotiate the existing swing-bridge (Varvarovsky Bridge). In order to solve the above problems, the Government of Ukraine planned the M-14 bypass project to provide a detour around the downtown area of Mykolaiv. However, the project for the new bridge across the Southern Bug River (Mykolaiv Bridge) has not been started because of lack of funds, consequently all vehicles must still pass over the existing swing-bridge to cross the river in Mykolaiv. In 2005, the Government of Ukraine requested Japan to apply a Yen Loan for the Mykolaiv bridge project (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”). In response to this request, the Government of Japan sent the TOR Mission to Ukraine and agreed to the scope of the “Preparatory Survey on the Project of Construction of Mykolaiv Bridge in Ukraine” (hereinafter referred to as “the Survey”), as stated in the Minutes of Meeting of August 5, 2010. According to the minutes, the preparatory survey was started on November 10 in order to review and update the Feasibility Study Report for the Mykolaiv Bridge undertaken in 2003. The analysis of alternatives takes into account social and environmental conditions and economic factors. The result was agreed in the manner prescribed for Highway Bridges. In agreement with the previous decision the route of the bridge was decided based on a promising route proposed in "The general plan Mykolaiv city", which was approved in 2007. The local authority reserved strip land to be acquisitioned for the construction. Currently, the land which fell in the border zone for use by natural and legal persons, is reserved for construction. To implement the planned construction these lands should be acquired from the current owners and transferred to the proponent of the construction. 6.1.2 Baseline of Environmental Condition 6.1.2.1 Ecological Condition (1) Common Flora Species Common flora species around the project are is shown in Table 6.1.1. 6-3 Table 6.1.1 Common Flora Species around Project Area No Habitats (example) Wild species Planted species 1 Canal and river corridors Potamogeton L. (rdesnyk), Absent Phragmites australis L. (reed) 2 Residential and garden land Stipa lessingina (feather grass Vegetables, for example. Lessing), S. pontica (Black Sea Potatoes, tomatoes, feather grass), S. ucrainica (feather flowers, fruit trees, for grass ukrainian), Festuca valesiaca example. apple, cherry (sheep fescue), Ambrosia artemisiifolia* (ragweed) 3 Paddy field 4 Forest Quercus robur (Oak tree), Ulmus Scotch pine (Pinus (elm tree), Acer (maple), Fraxinus sylvestris) (ash tree), Robinia (acacia) Source: 1. National Atlas of Ukraine (electronic version, second edition) that was prepared by the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NASU), with the scientific and methodological support of the Institute of Geography NASU-2007. 2. "Southern Bug Mediterranean ecological corridor: a brief overview of biodiversity and the most valuable territory" under the general editorship of V. Kostiushyna. International Wetlands of Black Sea Program. Kyiv - 2007. 3. T.L. Aleksenko, A.A.Solohyb Effect of dredging on benthos invertebrates of the Dnieper-Bug lagoon‐2006 Table 6.1.2 gives plant species characteristic of the natural conditions of the territory. Sampling location is shown in Figure 6.1.3. This area is under strong anthropogenic influence. Since the 50s of the last century natural land was pressured due to economic use and, at present, primitive habitats are extinct. Covered areas represent monoculture artificial plantation pine – the kind that is not typical for a given bio climatic zone. The areas of arable farmland are used for growing vegetables, perennial crops and so on. Water bodies (lagoons), over the past 100 years, have been damaged substantially by man-made pollution as a result of discharges of industrial waste waters, in addition 25-30% (depending on water content of the year) of the flow of the Southern Bug River is used to irrigate farmland and for industrial Water supply, which causes the increase of salt water in the lagoon. These factors have led to a significant depletion of aquatic flora, among which now occupies a dominant position rdesnyk (Potamogeton). Conclusion: any construction in the territory that is affected by the project now will not lead to the losses of natural biodiversity. The following Figure 6.1.3 and Table 6.1.2 show some locations of studies of flora and aquatic organisms and comment on the specific types of vegetation according to the surveyed points. In the area around the project nothing on the Red data list was found. (Ukraine Red book, flora. August 2005) 6-4 Preparatory Survey on the Project for Construction of Mykolaiv Bridge in Ukraine Final Report Source: The Southern Bug meridional river corridor biodiversity and valuable areas.(2007) Figure 6.1.3 Location Maps of Alien (Artificially Listed) Species 6-5 Table 6.1.2 Flora and Aquatic Organisms Point Description of flora and aquatic organisms and comment on the specific types of vegetation 1: Artificial forest plantations Pinus sylvestris and Robinia pseudoacacia under the age of 40. 2: Aquatic vegetation is dominated by associations formed of types of broad ecological amplitude - Potamogeton pectinatus, P. perfoliatus, Najas marina, Ceratophyllum demersum. Large areas are dominated by groups of water relicts - Nymphaea alba, Nuphar lutea, Trapa natans, Salvinia natans, Nymphoides peltata. Also playing an important role of air-aquatic vegetation, are Phragmites australis, Typha angustifolia, Scirpus lacustris. In the grassy marshes are the most common associations of Phragmites australis - Carex acuta, Phragmites australis - Carex riparia, Typha angustifolia - Carex acutiformis, Carex acuta pura. Earth moss features that prevail are meadow marshes and meadow plants, represented by groups dominated by Glyceria maxima, Carex acuta, Agrostis stolonifera, Festuca pratensis, Elytrigia repens, etc. In floristic respects are characterized by a large number of boreal meadow species - Agrostis gigantea, Alopecurus pratensis, Beckmannia eruciformis, Poa palustris, Carex vesicaria, Lathyrus palustris. 3: Large areas of rocky steppes dominated in the vegetation formations such as Festuceta valesiaceae,
Recommended publications
  • Ukraine Forestry Sector Note Status and Opportunities for Development

    Ukraine Forestry Sector Note Status and Opportunities for Development

    Ukraine Forestry Sector Note Status and Opportunities for Development March 2006 PREFACE This note was prepared by a combined team of World Bank staff and Ukrainian and international consultants, working in close collaboration with the State Forestry Committee of Ukraine. The team is grateful for contributions and support provided by the Swiss Development Corporation and PROFOR1. The findings and opinion presented are based on an assessment of the available information and consultations with a broad range of forestry sector stakeholders, including officials of the Ministry of Agricultural Policy; the Ministry of Industrial Policy; the Ministry of Environmental Protection; the State Forestry Committee, Oblast level forestry departments, State forest enterprises, private sector investors in primary and secondary wood processing industries, NGOs, and the academic community. The objective of the note is to draw attention to a tentative agenda of key issues, and to inform discussion among forestry sector stakeholders regarding the needs, opportunities and options available to maintain and manage Ukraine’s forests for the benefit of all. 1 PROFOR is a multi-donor partnership formed to pursue a shared goal of enhancing forests' contribution to poverty reduction, sustainable development and protection of environmental services, through improved knowledge and approaches for sustainable forest management. PROFOR is funded by the Department for International Development (DFID) of the United Kingdom, the Finnish Department for International Development
  • 7–26–04 Vol. 69 No. 142 Monday July

    7–26–04 Vol. 69 No. 142 Monday July

    7–26–04 Monday Vol. 69 No. 142 July 26, 2004 Pages 44457–44574 VerDate jul 14 2003 22:41 Jul 23, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\26JYWS.LOC 26JYWS 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 142 / Monday, July 26, 2004 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
  • The German Colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German Rivalry, 1883-1915

    The German Colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German Rivalry, 1883-1915

    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 7-1-1995 Doors left open then slammed shut: The German colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German rivalry, 1883-1915 Matthew Erin Plowman University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Plowman, Matthew Erin, "Doors left open then slammed shut: The German colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German rivalry, 1883-1915" (1995). Student Work. 435. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/435 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOORS LEFT OPEN THEN SLAMMED SHUT: THE GERMAN COLONIZATION OF SOUTHWEST AFRICA AND THE ANGLO-GERMAN RIVALRY, 1883-1915. A Thesis Presented to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts University of Nebraska at Omaha by Matthew Erin Plowman July 1995 UMI Number: EP73073 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI Blsaartalibn Publish*rig UMI EP73073 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
  • The Ecological Scales for the Species of Ukrainian Flora and Their Use in Synphytoindication

    The Ecological Scales for the Species of Ukrainian Flora and Their Use in Synphytoindication

    M.G. KHOLODNY INSTITUTE OF BOTANY NAS OF UKRAINE Ya.P. Didukh THE ECOLOGICAL SCALES FOR THE SPECIES OF UKRAINIAN FLORA AND THEIR USE IN SYNPHYTOINDICATION Kyiv - 2011 Didukh, Ya.P. The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use in synphytoindication. – Kyiv: Phytosociocentre, 2011. - 176 p. The amplitude scales of 3300 flora species of Ukraine are presented, reflecting species relation to 12 main climate and edaphic factors. The Tsyganov, Ramensky, Tsatsenkin, Ellenberg, Landolt, Zolyomi, Zarzycki, Frank et Klotz and other ecological scales’ comparisons are illustrated. The methods of synphytoindication are presented as an approach of ecological indices assessment based on phytosociological surveys taking into account indicator species presence and their occurrence in the community. The examples of practical applications of data using ordination and gradient analysis, the principal component method, ecological mapping, assessment of ecological factors changes in space (landscapes) and time (successions) are given. It is recommended for botanists and ecologists. Tabl. 7. Fig. 17. © Didukh Ya.P. Introduction Due to the immensity of the current anthropogenic impact, serious environmen- tal changes are occurring worldwide. Plants respond to these changes accordingly; first of all they disappear in some types of habitats and appear in other. That is why ecological research of flora is a very relevant and topical task. Studies of spe- cies ecology, estimation of species’ tolerance amplitude to the effects of different ecological factors, ways of adaptation, behavior and population renewal strategy, as well as the abilities to resist changes of ecological factors are closely related with problems of biodiversity conservation. Species organization and structure ensure functioning of the whole ecosystem pyramid, energy accumulation and transformation, circulation of substances, soil formation processes, existence of heterotrophic component, and evolution of ecosystems and their components.
  • Meridian Annual Report 2012

    Meridian Annual Report 2012

    ANNUAL REPORT 2012 Bringing The World Together 3542 international visitors 375 projects 160 countries Meridian International Center | Annual Report 2012 | 1 Chairman’s and President’s Message Building Partnerships for Better Leaders in Government, Business, and Civil Society For more than 50 years, Meridian International Center has been a place where global leaders come together and future leaders are found. We have built this solid reputation by providing cutting-edge programs and forums in which leaders collaborate to develop solutions to the problems facing their organizations, communities, and countries. Meridian knows that all diplomats, government officials, CEOs, entrepreneurs, service leaders, academics, and other constituents face one common challenge: how to succeed on the international stage. As a center for global leadership, Meridian pursues a strategic response to this challenge by bringing the world together. We understand that our biggest problems cannot be solved without global leadership, exchange, and collaboration. This is why we convene and create partnerships that develop emerging global leaders who navigate diverse socio-economic challenges around the world, increase opportunities for business in overseas markets, and create exchanges that deepen understanding between cultures, communities, and countries. A few notable highlights of our work in 2012 include: • The inaugural Meridian Global Leadership Summit was attended by 250 corporate and government stakeholders, and featured dynamic discussions with industry and diplomatic leaders on the future of global leadership; • A Service Innovation Summit in Madrid, Spain at which 200 service leaders from the U.S., Spain, and several countries discussed volunteerism as a solution for addressing pressing socio-economic challenges faced by communities worldwide; • The Young African Leaders Innovation Summit, where 62 young social and business entrepreneurs, from 42 African countries collaborated on innovative solutions for creating economic opportunity.
  • The Struve Geodetic Arc and Its Possible Connections to the Arc of the 30Th Meridian in Africa

    The Struve Geodetic Arc and Its Possible Connections to the Arc of the 30Th Meridian in Africa

    The Struve Geodetic Arc and Its Possible Connections to the Arc of the 30th Meridian in Africa James R SMITH, United Kingdom Keywords. Arc, Struve, 30th Arc, UNESCO SUMMARY This paper discusses the possible connections between the Struve Geodetic Arc and the Arc of the 39th Meridian in East Africa. Was the proposal by Otto Struve in 1868 carried out? If so, where are the results, if not, why not? Brief mention is made of the various later connections from the Struve Arc in Belarus to North Africa and hence a join in Egypt to the Arc of the 30th Meridian. Workshop – History of Surveying and Measurement 1/10 WSHS1 – History of Surveying and Measurement James Smith WSHS1.3 The Struve Geodetic Arc and Its Possible Connections to the Arc of the 30th Meridian in AfricaFIG Working Week 2004 Athens, Greece, May 22-27, 2004 The Struve Geodetic Arc and Its Possible Connections to the Arc of the 30th Meridian in Africa James R SMITH. United Kingdom 1. INTRODUCTION The Struve Geodetic Arc was from near North Cape in Northern Norway to near Ismail on the Black Sea was observed under the supervision of F G W Struve and Carl F de Tenner between 1816 and 1852. The Arc of the 30th Meridian from near Port Elizabeth in S Africa to near Cairo in Egypt was initiated by David Gill in South Africa in 1879 and was finally completed with the last section in the Sudan in 1954. The Struve Geodetic Arc has recently been submitted to UNESCO for possible recognition as a World Heritage Monument.
  • Assessment of Quality of Road Maintenance Works in Ukraine Ic Consulenten Road Maintenance Quality in Kiev Region: Final Report 04.08.2015

    Assessment of Quality of Road Maintenance Works in Ukraine Ic Consulenten Road Maintenance Quality in Kiev Region: Final Report 04.08.2015

    Assessment of Quality of Road Maintenance Works in Ukraine Client NGO “My Road” & Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine Document title Road Maintenance Quality in Kiev Region: Final Report 04.08.2015 Revision: 1 iC consulenten LLC Reytarskaya str., 37, 3rd floor, Kyiv, 04053, Ukraine T: +38 044 38 44 337 www.ic-consulenten.com.ua Assessment of Quality of Road Maintenance Works in Ukraine iC consulenten Road Maintenance Quality in Kiev Region: Final Report 04.08.2015 DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET PROJECT NUMBER: Project number 52xUA004 PREPARED BY: iC consulenten Ziviltechniker GesmbH Schönbrunner Strasse 297, A-1120 Vienna Tel: +43 1 521 69 0 Fax: +43 1 521 69 180 E-Mail: [email protected] iC consulenten LLC Reytarskaya str, 37, 3rd floor, Kyiv 04050, Ukraine Phone: +38 044 38 44 337 E-Mail: [email protected] PREPARED FOR: NGO “My Road” & Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine Roman Khmil DATE: 04.08.2015 EDITOR: James Mathews;Oleksii Melnyk Date Revision No. Editor Checked by Approved by Signature 24/07/ 2015 Rev. 0 Mathews/ Melnyk Useini Woetzinger 03/08/ 2015 Rev. 1 Mathews/ Melnyk Useini Woetzinger Revision: 1 Page I Assessment of Quality of Road Maintenance Works in Ukraine iC consulenten Road Maintenance Quality in Kiev Region: Final Report 04.08.2015 CONTACT SHEET Full legal name of Organisation: iC consulenten Ziviltechniker GesmbH Trading Name (if different from above): --- Country of Registration: Austria Address of registered office: Schönbrunner Strasse 297 1120 Wien Postal address (if different from above): --- Telephone number: +43 1 521 69 – 256 country code city code Number Fax number: +43 1 521 69 – 180 country code city code number Main contact person for this project: Mr James Mathews Main contact person’s position in the Project Manager Organisation: Contact person’s email address: [email protected] Website of the Organisation: www.ic-group.org Full legal name of Organisation: iC consulenten LLC Trading Name (if different from above): --- Country of Registration: Ukraine ave.
  • People's Republic of Bangladesh Power & Energy Sector Master Plan

    People's Republic of Bangladesh Power & Energy Sector Master Plan

    People’s Republic of Bangladesh Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources (MOPEMR) Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) People’s Republic of Bangladesh Power & Energy Sector Master Plan (PSMP2016) Final Report Summary September 2016 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Tokyo Electric Power Services Co., Ltd. Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc. BD JR 16-003 Power & Energy Sector Master Plan 2016 Final Report Contents Chapter 1 PSMP2016 Summary ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background and Purpose ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Vision Paper ................................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Policy Vision .................................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.4.1 PSMP2016 Objective .............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.4.2 Five Viewpoints of PSMP2016 ............................................................................................... 1-5 1.4.3 Importance of Contribution and Responsibility to the International Community ..................
  • Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Dark Septate Fungi in Plants Associated with Aquatic Environments Doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016Abb0296

    Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Dark Septate Fungi in Plants Associated with Aquatic Environments Doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016Abb0296

    Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate fungi in plants associated with aquatic environments doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016abb0296 Table S1. Presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and/or dark septate fungi (DSF) in non-flowering plants and angiosperms, according to data from 62 papers. A: arbuscule; V: vesicle; H: intraradical hyphae; % COL: percentage of colonization. MYCORRHIZAL SPECIES AMF STRUCTURES % AMF COL AMF REFERENCES DSF DSF REFERENCES LYCOPODIOPHYTA1 Isoetales Isoetaceae Isoetes coromandelina L. A, V, H 43 38; 39 Isoetes echinospora Durieu A, V, H 1.9-14.5 50 + 50 Isoetes kirkii A. Braun not informed not informed 13 Isoetes lacustris L.* A, V, H 25-50 50; 61 + 50 Lycopodiales Lycopodiaceae Lycopodiella inundata (L.) Holub A, V 0-18 22 + 22 MONILOPHYTA2 Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense L. A, V 2-28 15; 19; 52; 60 + 60 Osmundales Osmundaceae Osmunda cinnamomea L. A, V 10 14 Salviniales Marsileaceae Marsilea quadrifolia L.* V, H not informed 19;38 Salviniaceae Azolla pinnata R. Br.* not informed not informed 19 Salvinia cucullata Roxb* not informed 21 4; 19 Salvinia natans Pursh V, H not informed 38 Polipodiales Dryopteridaceae Polystichum lepidocaulon (Hook.) J. Sm. A, V not informed 30 Davalliaceae Davallia mariesii T. Moore ex Baker A not informed 30 Onocleaceae Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. A not informed 30 Onoclea sensibilis L. A, V 10-70 14; 60 + 60 Pteridaceae Acrostichum aureum L. A, V, H 27-69 42; 55 Adiantum pedatum L. A not informed 30 Aleuritopteris argentea (S. G. Gmel) Fée A, V not informed 30 Pteris cretica L. A not informed 30 Pteris multifida Poir.
  • Baseline Monitoring Report

    Baseline Monitoring Report

    The project “Stepping stones towards ensuring long-term favourable conservation status of Aquatic warbler in Lithuania” (LIFE MagniDucatusAcrola) No. LIFE15 NAT/LT/001024 is financed by the EU LIFE Programme, Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania and project partners. BASELINE MONITORING REPORT Compiled by: Gintaras Riauba Žymantas Morkvėnas Dr. Aleksandr Kozulin Dr. Žydrūnas Preikša Dr. Dalytė Matulevičiūtė Dr. Andrius Petrašiūnas Vilnius, 2018 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1. Project overview ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2. Aquatic Warbler (Acrocephalus paludicola) .................................................................................... 4 1.3. The Baseline monitoring report .......................................................................................................... 5 2. Executive summary ...................................................................................................................... 6 3. Summary of implementation ....................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Bird monitoring ......................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2. Vegetation monitoring ..........................................................................................................................
  • Road Safety in Ukraine Cooperation with the European Union

    Road Safety in Ukraine Cooperation with the European Union

    MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURE OF UKRAINE Road Safety in Ukraine Cooperation with the European Union The 10th Eastern Partnership Transport Panel (11 May 2016, Brussels, Belgium) VOLODYMYR KOSKOVETSKYI – Director of Department of Safety on Transport of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine| May 2016 | GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT UKRAINE UKRAINE Total area – 603 628 sq. km Population – 42,7 million people (the fifth in Europe) Capital – the city of Kyiv (population – 2,8 million) Ukraine borders on: In the West – Poland, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, Moldova In the North – Belarus In the Northeast and East – Russia In the South – is bounded by the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine| May 2016 | UKRAINE IN THE NETWORK OF INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT CORRIDORS Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine| May 2016 | STATISTICAL DATA ON ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS FATALITIES IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS PER 1 MIO INHABITANTS – UKRAINE/EU Ukraine, 2014 – 104 EU, 2010 – 63 EU, 2014 – 51 Killed in road traffic accidents yearly : 4-5 ths. persons Annual losses of Ukraine due to accidents (as per estimate of the World Bank, the World Health Organization): 4-5 billion USD Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine| May 2016 | OUR OBJECTIVE IN 2020 Resolution of the UN General Assembly (2010) 2011 – 2020 The Decade of Action for Road Safety Ukraine’s objective in 2020: road traffic accident fatalities – decrease by 50% The year of 2010: The year of 2020: ≈ 5,400 2,700 road traffic accident fatalities road
  • World Fishery Resources

    World Fishery Resources

    41 3.2.6 Central Asia (Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan) This central Asian grouping contains most of the Aral Sea basin with the Aral Sea and the Syr Darya and Amu Darya Rivers. It also includes Lake Balkhash (Kazakhstan). The statistical data set for this grouping is shorter than most, as before 1988 it was reported as a homogenous group within the former USSR area. During Soviet times, people were strongly encouraged to eat fish once a week. During these “fish days”, restaurants served mainly fish dishes. This tradition disappeared when the USSR collapsed and fish became less readily available. The major producers of inland fish in this region are Kazakhstan, which represented 58.2 percent of the catch from the region in 2009, and Turkmenistan (25.9 percent), because of their association with Lake Balkhash, the Caspian Sea and the Sea of Azov (Figure 28). Catches declined from 1989 (193 081 tonnes) to 1998 (41 966 tonnes) because these countries began recording fisheries data separately. These trends in catch can be attributed to the drying out and pollution of the Aral Sea from the water abstractions for cotton culture; Lake Balkhash is following a similar trajectory because of dams on inflowing rivers. This has damaged the important stocks of “kilka” (Clupeonella cultriventris) that previously formed a staple of the fishery, which had reached some 450 000 tonnes in 1974 (Box 7). The reasons for the collapse of fisheries in this region during this period have been explored by Thorpe et al. (2009). However, trends over the last ten years have been for a slight renewal of the fisheries, at least in Kazakhstan, although fisheries in Turkmenistan have remained relatively stable (FAO estimate) and those of Azerbaijan have continued to decline.