DOCSLIB.ORG

Julian Opie Unveils New Works As Van Dyck's Self

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Julian Opie Unveils New Works As Van Dyck's Self News Release Wednesday 2 August 2017 JULIAN OPIE UNVEILS NEW WORKS AS VAN DYCK’S SELF- PORTRAIT RETURNS TO NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY FOLLOWING THREE-YEAR UK TOUR George. by Julian Opie, 2014; Courtesy Julian Opie and Lisson Gallery, London; Self-portrait by Anthony van Dyck, c. 1640 © National Portrait Gallery, London npg.org.uk/vandyck; Faime. by Julian Opie, 2016; Courtesy Julian Opie and Lisson Gallery, London Artist Julian Opie has made new work to display alongside the National Portrait Gallery’s self-portrait of Sir Anthony van Dyck (1599-1641), acquired in 2014 after a major public fundraising appeal, as it returns to the Gallery following a three-year nationwide tour. In Julian Opie after Van Dyck (6 October 2017 - 7 January 2018) one of Britain’s foremost contemporary artists has been invited to present his work in dialogue with Van Dyck's self-portrait (c.1640) in the seventeenth-century galleries. The powerful new and recent works shown in this free display include Faime. (2016), Lucia, back 3. (2017) and Beach Head, 6. (2017). While, at first glance, Opie’s portraits are distinctly modern in their concise and abstracted forms, the style, composition and media are inspired by a variety of historic and contemporary visual sources. These range from ancient Egyptian and Roman art, and Dutch and British painted portraits of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, to eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Japanese prints, and the symbolic language of modern signage. The influence of seventeenth-century British portraiture on the works in this display is evident in the elegant pose of several of the sitters, and the turning postures that playfully reference Van Dyck’s self-portrait. Viewing the old and new portraits side by side illuminates the influence and continuing relevance of Old Masters such as Van Dyck on British contemporary portrait practice. Dr Nicholas Cullinan, Director of the National Portrait Gallery, London, says: ‘Following its hugely successful nationwide tour this is a wonderful opportunity for our visitors to see Van Dyck’s Self-portrait back in the seventeenth century galleries of the National Portrait Gallery but also alongside striking works by Julian Opie.’ Catharine MacLeod, Curator of Julian Opie after Van Dyck and Senior Curator, Seventeenth-Century Portraits, National Portrait Gallery, London, says: ‘Julian Opie's work references historical portraiture, and has often used compositional devices employed by seventeenth-century artists. The portraits in this display are a testament to Van Dyck’s lasting legacy in Britain.’ Julian Opie (b.1958) studied at Goldsmiths' College (1979-82) under Michael Craig-Martin, for whom he briefly worked as an assistant. He then emerged as an influential figure on the British art scene in the 1980s, with a series of painted metal sculptures. Opie’s portraits are created by a process of refinement of line and form, the result of which is a distilled image that nevertheless retains key signifiers that are enough to ‘read’ the subject’s likeness, such as the position of the head on shoulders, a facial feature or an accessory. His work has been exhibited extensively in galleries and museums worldwide. Julian Opie after Van Dyck is the final display of three to be held at the Gallery as part of the three-year tour of the recently-acquired Van Dyck self-portrait. In 2016 the work was reunited with a loaned William Dobson self-portrait, which had been in the same private collection as the Van Dyck for 300 years. Part of Painting the Artist: Van Dyck and Early Self-portraiture in Britain, this display included a selection of self-portraits from the Gallery’s permanent collection. In 2015, the Van Dyck self-portrait was accompanied by the loan of two portraits by the artist of Charles I and Queen Henrietta Maria from the Prime Minister’s official residence Chequers, for the display Van Dyck: Transforming British Art, which focused on the artist and his contemporaries. This display marks the culmination of the Art Fund and Heritage Lottery Fund-supported Van Dyck: A Masterpiece for Everyone project, in which Van Dyck’s self-portrait was displayed alongside historic and modern art at galleries around the nation. The tour started at Turner Contemporary, Margate (January - May 2015) before continuing to Manchester Art Gallery in May 2015, Dulwich Picture Gallery between January and April 2016 and, until September 2016, at Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery, and finally in 2017 at the Laing Art Gallery, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, and the Scottish National Portrait Gallery, Edinburgh. All these venues have invited contributions from contemporary artists; these have included Mark Wallinger (Dulwich) and John Stezaker (Birmingham). Each display on the tour was accompanied by a substantial learning and access programme, talks and events for a range of audiences including adults, school children and their teachers and young people, were held at all venues, and approaches to gallery and museum learning have been shared across the partnership. Anthony van Dyck was born and trained in Antwerp, and went to work for the great painter Peter Paul Rubens while still in his teens. Quickly recognised as Rubens’s most talented assistant, he soon set out to gain wider experience. Van Dyck briefly visited England in 1620–1, and then spent six years travelling and painting in Italy. Work in Antwerp and the Northern Netherlands followed this, and then in 1632, he returned to England. Here, he was created Principal Painter to King Charles I, knighted and housed at the king’s expense, and began producing paintings – almost all portraits. Portrait painting in England in the early seventeenth century was similar to Elizabethan portraiture. Fabrics and jewellery were minutely and beautifully depicted; while faces often had the appearance of expressionless masks. Van Dyck’s paintings, by contrast, with their command of perspective and space, confident brushwork and sense of movement, set a new standard to which his contemporaries and successors aspired. Artists ranging from Gainsborough to Sargent turned to him for inspiration. DISPLAY: Julian Opie after Van Dyck (6 October 2017 - 7 January 2018) National Portrait Gallery, London, Room 7, Admission free Van Dyck’s Self-portrait is currently on display in: Looking Good: The Male Gaze from Van Dyck to Lucian Freud Scottish National Portrait Gallery, Edinburgh: 24 June – 1 October 2017 VAN DYCK: A MASTERPIECE FOR EVERYONE TOUR : 2015 Turner Contemporary, Margate: 24 January – 10 May 2015 Self: Image and Identity Manchester Art Gallery: 21 May – 31 August 2015 Artists in the Frame: Self Portraits by Van Dyck and others National Portrait Gallery: 4 September 2015 – 3 January 2016 Van Dyck: Transforming British Art 2016 Dulwich Picture Gallery, London: 12 January – 24 April 2016 Making Discoveries: I am Van Dyck Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery: 28 May – 4 September 2016 Turning to See: From Van Dyck to Lucian Freud National Portrait Gallery: 16 September 2016 – 8 January 2017 Painting the Artist: Van Dyck and Early Self-portraiture in Britain 2017 Laing Art Gallery, Newcastle: 28 January – 4 June 2017 Modern Visionaries: Van Dyck and the Artist’s Eye Scottish National Portrait Gallery, Edinburgh: 24 June – 1 October 2017 Looking Good: The Male Gaze from Van Dyck to Lucian Freud WEBSITE: Information about the Van Dyck Self-portrait including specially commissioned films detailing a period of conservation of the painting can be found on the Gallery’s website www.npg.org.uk/vandyck PUBLICATION: A booklet on the Van Dyck Self-portrait (£5 paperback) is available from the National Portrait Gallery Shops and online (npg.org.uk/shop). There is also a full range of Van Dyck products available. Van Dyck Self-portrait 1640-1 Purchased with support from the Heritage Lottery Fund, the Art Fund in honour of David Verey CBE (Chairman of the Art Fund 2004–2014), the Portrait Fund, The Monument Trust, the Garfield Weston Foundation, the Aldama Foundation, the Deborah Loeb Brice Foundation, Sir Harry Djanogly CBE, Mr and Mrs Michael Farmer, Matthew Freud, Catherine Green, Dr Bendor Grosvenor, Alexander Kahane, the Catherine Lewis Foundation, the Material World Foundation, The Sir Denis Mahon Charitable Trust, Cynthia Lovelace Sears, two major supporters who wish to remain anonymous, and many contributions from the public following a joint appeal by the National Portrait Gallery and the Art Fund. For further press information please contact: Neil Evans, Media Relations Manager, National Portrait Gallery, Tel 020 7312 2452 (not for publication) Email [email protected] NOTES TO EDITORS The Van Dyck Self-portrait Van Dyck’s last Self-portrait (c. 1640) was acquired by the National Portrait Gallery through a major fundraising appeal with the Art Fund, and with thanks to a major grant of £6,343,500 from the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF), on 1 May 2014. It is one of three known self-portraits painted by Van Dyck when he was in England, and it probably dates from the last years of his life. The artist shows himself fashionably dressed but apparently in the act of painting, the line of his right shoulder and sleeve suggesting his hand raised in the process of applying paint to a canvas just out of sight. The broad handling of the paint in the costume, compared with the face, may indicate that this area of the painting is unfinished, or it may be that this is simply a more experimental work than his formal court portraits. The frame of this painting, crested with the sunflower motif associated with the artist, is of outstanding importance and is likely to have been designed with Van Dyck's involvement. Born in Antwerp in 1599, Anthony van Dyck was an artistic prodigy who worked as an assistant to Peter Paul Rubens.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anecdotes of Painting in England : with Some Account of the Principal
    C ' 1 2. J? Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/paintingineng02walp ^-©HINTESS <0>F AEHJKTID 'oat/ /y ' L o :j : ANECDOTES OF PAINTING IN ENGLAND; WITH SOME ACCOUNT OF THE PRINCIPAL ARTISTS; AND INCIDENTAL NOTES ON OTHER ARTS; COLLECTED BY THE LATE MR. GEORGE VERTUE; DIGESTED AND PUBLISHED FROM HIS ORIGINAL MSS. BY THE HONOURABLE HORACE WALPOLE; WITH CONSIDERABLE ADDITIONS BY THE REV. JAMES DALLAWAY. LONDON PRINTED AT THE SHAKSPEARE PRESS, BY W. NICOL, FOR JOHN MAJOR, FLEET-STREET. MDCCCXXVI. LIST OF PLATES TO VOL. II. The Countess of Arundel, from the Original Painting at Worksop Manor, facing the title page. Paul Vansomer, . to face page 5 Cornelius Jansen, . .9 Daniel Mytens, . .15 Peter Oliver, . 25 The Earl of Arundel, . .144 Sir Peter Paul Rubens, . 161 Abraham Diepenbeck, . 1S7 Sir Anthony Vandyck, . 188 Cornelius Polenburg, . 238 John Torrentius, . .241 George Jameson, his Wife and Son, . 243 William Dobson, . 251 Gerard Honthorst, . 258 Nicholas Laniere, . 270 John Petitot, . 301 Inigo Jones, .... 330 ENGRAVINGS ON WOOD. Arms of Rubens, Vandyck & Jones to follow the title. Henry Gyles and John Rowell, . 39 Nicholas Stone, Senior and Junior, . 55 Henry Stone, .... 65 View of Wollaton, Nottinghamshire, . 91 Abraham Vanderdort, . 101 Sir B. Gerbier, . .114 George Geldorp, . 233 Henry Steenwyck, . 240 John Van Belcamp, . 265 Horatio Gentileschi, . 267 Francis Wouters, . 273 ENGRAVINGS ON WOOD continued. Adrian Hanneman, . 279 Sir Toby Matthews, . , .286 Francis Cleyn, . 291 Edward Pierce, Father and Son, . 314 Hubert Le Soeur, . 316 View of Whitehall, . .361 General Lambert, R. Walker and E. Mascall, 368 CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuart Debauchery in Restoration Satire
    Stuart Debauchery in Restoration Satire Neal Hackler A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the PhD degree in English Supervised by Dr. Nicholas von Maltzahn Department of English Faculty of Arts University of Ottawa © Neal Hackler, Ottawa, Canada, 2015. ii Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iii Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures and Illustrations.............................................................................................v List of Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... vi Note on Poems on Affairs of State titles ............................................................................. vii Stuart Debauchery in Restoration Satire Introduction – Making a Merry Monarch...................................................................1 Chapter I – Abundance, Excess, and Eikon Basilike ..................................................8 Chapter II – Debauchery and English Constitutions ................................................. 66 Chapter III – Rochester, “Rochester,” and more Rochester .................................... 116 Chapter IV – Satirists and Secret Historians .......................................................... 185 Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • A Countess Transformed: How Lady Susan Vere Became Lady Anne Clifford
    Brief Chronicles Vol. IV (2012-13) 117 A Countess Transformed: How Lady Susan Vere Became Lady Anne Clifford Bonner Miller Cutting ince the sixteenth century, Wilton House has been the ancient country manor home of the Earls of Pembroke, and among its treasures is a large Spainting centered on the wall of the majestic Double Cubed Room (Figure One). In fact, the Double Cubed Room was specifically designed by the eminent seventeenth century architect Inigo Jones to display this very painting, which spans seventeen feet across and is eleven feet high. Considered “a perfect school unto itself”1 as an example of the work of Sir Anthony Van Dyck, it contains ten figures, all life size with the exception of the Earl himself. who is slightly larger in scale than the rest, a subtle tribute to his dominance of the family group.2 However, it is not the unique place of this painting in art history or the brilliance of the painter that is called into question, but the identity of the woman in black sitting to the left of the 4th Earl of Pembroke. The official twentieth century catalogue of the Pembroke family’s art collection flatly identifies her as the Earl’s second wife, Anne Clifford.3 The purpose of this paper is to determine if this attribution can stand up to scrutiny when the portrait is placed in its historical and cultural context. The official reason for the identification of Lady Anne Clifford is the fact that Philip, the 4th Earl of Pembroke, was married to her when the portrait was painted.
    [Show full text]
  • William Dobson
    William Dobson (1611-1646) MARY DONE, c.1635-38 Oil on canvas 64 x 84 cm Purchased with support from the Grosvenor Museum Society, V&A Purchase Grant Fund 2000.24 Framed with support from John Davies Framing Ltd., Grosvenor Museum Society, North West Museums Service The Sitter Mary Done was the second daughter of Sir John Done and Dorothy, Lady Done. One of eight children, she was born in 1604 at Utkinton Hall, ten miles from Chester, and was baptised at Tarporley. In 1636 she married John Crewe M.P. (1603-70), second son of Sir Randulph Crewe of Crewe Hall. They had four children, born between 1637 and 1641: the youngest was Sir John Crewe, whose portrait also hangs in the Art Gallery. In 1639 she became 22nd Chief Forester of Delamere and Mondrem, and her symbol of office, the Delamere Horn, is displayed in the Silver Gallery. On her death at Utkinton in 1690 her son wrote: “This day died my mother, the best parent, the truest friend, the greatest housekeeper of her rank, and the most pious Christian of her time.” 1 The Artist The portrait painter William Dobson was born and died at London. He was apprenticed to William Peake and studied with Francis Cleyn. This picture, whose composition is based on Sir Anthony van Dyck’s 1635 triple portrait of King Charles I, was painted around 1635-38 and is one of Dobson’s earliest surviving works. Dobson was the heroic portraitist of the Royalist cause during the English Civil War, filling the role of the king’s principal painter at the court of Charles I in Oxford between 1642 and 1646.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical and Technical Investigation of Sir Peter Lely's Cimon and Efigenia from the Collection at Doddington Hall
    A Historical and Technical Investigation of Sir Peter Lely’s Cimon and Efigenia from the Collection at Doddington Hall. Introduction German Westphalia. The name of Lely, under which he would become famous as an artist, stems from the The Conservation and Art Historical Analysis Project lily, which adorned the gable of his father’s house in 1 at the Courtauld Institute Research Forum aimed to Soest. carry out technical investigation and art historical re- In emulation of Vasari and the Netherlandish search on Sir Peter Lely’s painting Cimon and Efigenia. artist-biographer Karel van Mander, Houbraken wrote The painting came to the Courtauld Gallery in 2012 on the lives of the most famous Dutch artists. Peter for the Lely: A Lyrical Vision exhibition, which focused Lely proves an interesting case, as he seems as much – on Lely’s subject pictures from his earlier years in Eng- or perhaps even more – an English artist. When Lely’s land. After the exhibition, Cimon and Efigenia was soldier-father noticed that his son preferred wielding brought to the conservation department for conser- the brush over the sword and the art of painting over vation treatment. Cimon and Efigenia’s conservation the art of warfare, he sent his 18-year-old son to the treatment, along with previous technical examination Dutch city of Haarlem to study under the painter Frans 2 of the Courtauld Gallery’s Peter Lely subject pictures, Pieter de Grebber. Hardly any work from the time he provided a unique opportunity to further investigate spent in Haarlem is known, however, and it seems that the history of this painting and its place within Lely’s Lely’s career only became truly established when he practice and oeuvre.
    [Show full text]
  • Diploma Lecture Series 2012 Absolutism to Enlightenment
    Diploma Lecture Series 2012 Absolutism to enlightenment: European art and culture 1665-1765 Charles II and the restoration Lorraine Kypiotis 15 / 16 February 2012 Lecture summary: The Restoration had an exhilarating bravado characterised by a lavish and flamboyant court. It saw the return of the theatre, a flourishing of the arts and the founding of the Royal Society in a court that was the glamorous and often scandalous centre of a London that would rise from the flames like a phoenix. The return of Charles II to the throne in 1660 marked a moment of political and cultural change almost as dramatic as that brought about by his father’s execution 11 years earlier. After the repressions of the interregnum and the uncertainties and poverty of the exiled court, there was an appetite for exuberance, indulgence and transgression – an appetite that the king came to symbolize. After the puritanical sobriety of Cromwell’s parliament, England once again flourished in the arts and sciences. Charles, and his court patronised a number of scientists, architects, poets and dramatists whose influences were felt far beyond the reign of the “Merry Monarch”. Most importantly in the field of the fine arts, Charles was responsible for the recovery of many of the great paintings in the British Royal Collection that had been sold by the Commonwealth after his father’s execution; for the acquisition of a number of fine works by the great artists of the Baroque; and in his patronage of portraitists such as Sir Peter Lely. Charles and the artists he patronised were responsible for the enduring images of a monarchy restored.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Patronage and Corruption in Early Stuart England
    COURT PATRONAGE AND CORRUPTION IN EARLY STUART ENGLAND COURT PATRONAGE AND CORRUPTION IN EARLY STUART ENGLAND Linda Levy Peck London First published in 1990 by the Academic Division of Unwin Hyman Ltd. First published in paperback in 1993 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 © 1990, 1993 Linda Levy Peck All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Peck, Linda Levy Court patronage and corruption in early Stuart England. 1. Great Britain. Government. Patronage. History I. Title 354.420009 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Peck, Linda Levy. Court patronage and corruption in early Stuart England/Linda Levy Peck. p. cm. Originally published: Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1990. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Great Britain—Politics and government—1603–1649. 2. Great Britain—Court and courtiers—History—17th century. 3. Patronage, Political—Great Britain—History—17th century. 4. Political corruption—Great Britain—History—17th century. 5. England— Social conditions—17th century. I. Title. DA390.P43 1993 306.2′094l′09032–dc20 92–46114
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Role and Status of Scenic Artists in England
    THE CHANGING ROLE AND STATUS OF SCENIC ARTISTS IN ENGLAND CHRISTINA YOUNG INTRODUCTION (Lloyds 1875; Vernon-Smith 2008 and see Vernon-Smith in this volume). The materials and techniques were very similar This paper surveys the changing role and status of painters to those used for fourteenth-century northern European who painted cloth for scenery beginning with painters in tüchlein paintings (Heydenreich 2008), and those used by the service of King Henry III (1216–1272), commissioned Holbein in the sixteenth century for the painted cloth theatre to paint both portraits and pageant banners. It traces the at the Greenwich Festivities of 1527 (Foister 2001). Scenic development of the guilds, the King’s Painters and the King’s cloths could be washed down, reused or cut up (Vernon-Smith, Serjeant Painters who painted cloths for court events includ- 2011). Fires have been responsible for the majority of losses ing pageants and masques over a 300-year period. It charts of scenic cloth, along with the theatres that housed them. the subsequent move towards specialized scenic artists in the Everyday usage, handing and environmental conditions result seventeenth century, once the theatre had been established with time in a material (whether flax, cotton or silk) that is outside the court, and the eventual split between artist and brittle and fragile (Young 2012). Thus, painted cloth is innately designer in the twentieth century. The research into scenic ephemeral, but it is not necessarily unimportant at the time art, of which this survey forms a part, has begun to establish of its inception. Excluding the Royal Opera House working the scope of comparative documentary material and extant collection and the Victoria and Albert Museum collection of cloths, with the long-term objective of exploring how working approximately 50 cloths mainly from the twentieth century, in the two different contexts of scenic and fine art influence this research suggests that a further 30 scenic cloths in the the practices and creative output of the artist.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Slideshow Family 2018 in Printable Form
    05/08/2019 Charles II studio of John Michael Catherine of Braganza Dirk Stoop NPG Wright NPG James II unknown artist c 1690 NPG James II Sir Godfrey Kneller NPG James when Duke of York as Mars 1672-3 James II 1685 artist unknown by Henri Gascar, Queen’s House Greenwich 1 05/08/2019 James when Duke of York c. 1665 by James dressed as Roman general c. 1686 by Sir Peter Lely, Royal Collection Grinling Gibbons now in Trafalgar Square Edward Hyde Earl of Clarendon by William Dobson James and Anne as Duke and Duchess of York c. 1665 by Sir Peter Lely, National Portrait Gallery Edward Hyde Lord Chancellor by Sir Peter Lely Anne Hyde, Duchess of York 1662 by Sir Peter Lely, Hampton Court Palace 2 05/08/2019 Anne Hyde, Duchess of York c. Anne Hyde, Duchess of York c. 1661 by 1670 by Sir Peter Lely, National Sir Peter Lely, Scottish National Gallery Portrait Gallery at Lyme Park Anne aged 4 with a great tit by Lely The Duke and Duchess of York 1668-70 by Sir Peter Lely with their two daughters Mary and Anne added by Benedetto Gennari II c. 1680, Royal Collection Anne aged four unknown artist at French Court with Duchess of James, Duke of Cambridge by John Orleans Michael Wright 1666-7 3 05/08/2019 James Duke of Cambridge second son of James, Duke of Cambridge by James II c 1667 by John Michael Wright William Wissing c. 1667 Isabella Stuart by Sir Peter Lely c. 1678 Mary of Modena by William Wissing 1687 SNPG Mary of Modena by William Mary of Modena by Sir Peter Lely Wissing c.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spirit & Force Of
    THE SPIRIT &FORCE OF ART Drawing in Britain 1600–1750 THE SPIRIT & FORCE OF ART: DRAWING IN BRITAIN 1600–1750 3 Clifford Street, London 20 June to 6 July 2018 London London Art Week 29 June to 6 July 2018 new york TeFAF New York Fall 27 to 31 October 2018 THE SPIRIT &FORCE OF ART Drawing in Britain 1600–1750 Lowell Libson & Jonny Yarker Ltd London 2018 Contents Index of Artists 6 Foreword Lowell Libson 7 Introduction Jonny Yarker 8 3 Clifford Street · London w1S 2LF +44 (0)20 7734 8686 ‘The spirit and force of art’: [email protected] Defining Drawing in England, 1600–1750 www.libson-yarker.com Richard Stephens 11 Lowell Libson [email protected] A Lost Art? Collecting Early British Drawings Jonny Yarker & their Critical Fate [email protected] Richard Stephens and Jonny Yarker 33 Cressida St Aubyn [email protected] CATALoGUe Published by Lowell Libson & Jonny Yarker Ltd 2018 I Towards an English School 41 Text and publication © Lowell Libson & Jonny Yarker Ltd All rights reserved II Academies 69 ISBn 978 1 9999783 1 0 Designed by Dalrymple III The Rise of the Sketch 85 Set in Mário Feliciano’s Rongel type Photography by Rodney Todd-White & Son Ltd VI From Prospect to Landscape 101 Colour reproduction by Altaimage Ltd Printed in Belgium by Albe De Coker V From Ceiling to Exhibition Room: the Progress of History Painting 127 VI Face Painting 147 VII ‘A noble, delightful and useful art’: Drawings by Antiquarians, Amateurs and Artisans 169 VIII The Age of Hogarth 181 Notes and References 199 Index of Artists Foreword References are to catalogue numbers Laguerre, Louis 47 We are delighted to publish this catalogue which represents the culmination of over ten years of gathering these rare drawings which were created before the ‘Golden Age’ Amigoni, Jacopo 58 Laroon, Marcellus 73 of British watercolours and which demonstrate the formation of an identifiable ‘British’ Baron, Bernard 74 Laroon, Marcellus, the younger 84 School.
    [Show full text]
  • OLIVER MILLAR (Ref OM)
    OLIVER MILLAR (Ref OM) This archive collection has not yet been catalogued. The material remains unsorted and in its original order. File titles given are those assigned by Oliver Millar. Box numbers have been allocated by the Centre. If you wish to consult any material from this collection, please specify the box number and file title (where applicable). Please note that it is only possible to request 10 files or notebooks per retrieval. Access will be provided in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 1998. Full details relating to access to the Centre’s collections can be found here: http://www.paul-mellon-centre.ac.uk/23/ The material in this archive comprises correspondence, images, articles, research notes, published material and Oliver Millar’s notebooks. Box Box title File or volume title Description of material Covering Extent number (if applicable). dates Sequence 1: Research files on artists 1 -Blyenbach: VM. Somerset House Conference -Cornelius Jonson – several files -Hanneman -Bacon -Leemput -Bower -Jackson -Parker, Travel etc, Scott Grenbury. Flesshiers -Shepherd, Mascall, Giles -Ecycke, Priwitzer, Belcamp, Lanier -I.H.Carlisle -Tradescent Set. De Critz, Walter, Staphorst, E.S. Demetrius -Fuller, Van Hees, Stone, Cleyn(?) -Hayls. etc Box 2 -Hayls: Bertie, Noel, Chaworth etc -Hayls: Poulett Family -Russell & Style of -Souch. Des Granges. De Neve. Carleton. Mongrammis PM -IW/IWF. Marloe: Greenhall: Bylis, Browman -T. Leigh. Hunt. Bellish. De Leyer. Taylor (Oxford) -Weesop -Dobson: ½ - ¾ length -Dobson: full-lengths. Groups -Dobson: busts -Dobson: Self-portraits -Dobson: papers -Dobson: Subject pictures -Dobson: After etc. Comparative -Walker: Cromwell. Lambert -Walker: After etc -Greenhill -Greenhill drawings -Gennari -Soest I -Soest II -Borsselaer -Wright.
    [Show full text]
  • Van Dyck and the Early Stuart Painters
    • There was a major change in society, the court and the role of painting with the end of the Tudor period and the start of the Stuart period. • James was welcomed into London but his thick Scottish accent, his love of certain favourites and his Scottish ways were not well received at court. Throughout his life James had close relationships with male courtiers, which has caused debate among historians about their exact nature. After his accession in England, his peaceful and scholarly attitude contrasted strikingly with the bellicose and flirtatious behaviour of Elizabeth, as indicated by the contemporary epigram Rex fuit Elizabeth, nunc est regina Jacobus (Elizabeth was King, now James is Queen). • During the Tudor period paintings were not regarded as valuable or important. This changed dramatically during the early Stuart period, partly because of the influence of Peter Paul Rubens and then Anthony van Dyck and partly because Charles was an art lover and became one of the biggest collectors in Europe. • As a result the status of painters was low. A painter would paint an inn sign one day and a portrait the next. They were therefore poorly paid and were treated in England as craftsmen rather than artists. • The status depended on the artist, most were paid more than craftsmen but less than courtiers with the exception of Rubens and Van Dyck who were both knighted. The reason can be seen by comparing Daniel Mytens portrait of Charles with that of Van Dyck. • Let us first consider the kings and queens of the early Stuart period.
    [Show full text]