LA CALIDAD DEL AGUA EN LAS AMÉRICAS | RIESGOS Y OPORTUNIDADES 1 Water Quality in the Americas Risks and Opportunities WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 1
Water Quality in the Americas Risks and Opportunities 2 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
The Inter-American Network of Academies of Sciences IANAS IANAS is a regional network of Academies of Sciences created to support cooperation to strengthen science and technology as tools for advancing research and development, prosperity and equity in the Americas. IANAS is regional member of the Inter Academy Partnership (IAP).
IANAS Water Program of IANAS Co-Chairs: Juan Asenjo and Jeremy McNeil Co-Chairs: Katherine Vammen (Nicaragua), Directora Ejecutiva: Adriana de la Cruz Molina Co-Chair Honorarios: José
Editorial Committee Henry Vaux (USA). SpanishTundisi (Brasil) proofreading and Blanca Jiménez (México).
Gabriel Roldán (Colombia), Jose Tundisi (Brazil), Blanca Jiménez and authors of the chapters. (Mexico), Katherine Vammen (Nicaragua), Henry Vaux (USA), Ma. Areli Montes Suárez Ernesto González (Venezuela) with the collaboration of Miguel Doria Translation of UNESCO-IHP for Latin America and the Caribbean. Book Coordination Suzanne D. Stephens Katherine Vammen, Heny Vaux and Adriana de la Cruz Molina. Editorial Design Reviewers Committee Víctor Daniel Moreno Alanís
Administrative Support Gabriel Roldán (Colombia), Katherine Vammen (Nicaragua), Henry Vaux (USA), Ernesto González (Venezuela), Ricardo Izurieta (Ecuador), José Fábrega (Panama) and Pablo Pastén González (Chile). Alejandra Muñoz Buenrostro
We are grateful for the reviews by the National Committees and Focal Points of the International Hydrological Program, as well as the Members of CODIA who responded to the request for revision of the chapters of this publication.
- - Printed by The Inter-American Network of Academies of Sciences (IANAS-IAP) Calle Cipreses s/n, Km 23.5 de la Carret - era Federal México-Cuernavaca, 14400 Tlalpan, Ciudad de México, México and the United Nations Educational, Scientif ic and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France, con oficina UNESCO en Monte video, Edificio Mercosur, Luis Pereira 1992, 2o piso, casilla de correo 859, 11200 Montevideo, Uruguay. © IANAS 2019 ISBN: 978-607-8379-33-0 Printed in México
-
Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licens es/by-sa/3.0/igo/). For the printed and electronic book the present license applies exclusively to the text content of the publication. For the use of any material not clearly identified as belonging to IANAS, IAP or UNESCO prior permission shall be requested from: [email protected]. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression
territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IANAS, IAP, UNESCO or CODIA concerning the legal status of any country,
or CODIA and do not commit the Organization. opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of IANAS-IAP, UNESCO
-
This publication has been printed on ecological paper (FSC Certification): one part of the fibers is from recycled materi in order to contribute to the conservation of water resources. al and the other from forests exploited in a sustainable manner. Moreover, this paper is chlorine free (ECF Certification) WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 3
Water Quality in the Americas Risks and Opportunities 4 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES Academies and scientific organizations affiliated to IANAS
Argentina Robert Williams, President Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales de Argentina www.ancefn.org.ar
Juan Tirao, President Academia Nacional de Ciencias www.anc-argentina.org.ar/es/
Brazil Luiz Davidovich, President Academia Brasileira de Ciências www.abc.org.br
Bolivia Gonzalo Taboada López, President Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Bolivia www.aciencias.org.bo
Canada Chad Gaffield, President The Royal Society of Canada : The Academies of Arts, Humanities and Sciences of Canada https://rsc-src.ca/en/
Caribbean Winston Mellowes, President Caribbean Academy of Sciences www.caswi.org
Chile María Cecilia Hidalgo Tapia, President Academia Chilena de Ciencias www.academia-ciencias.cl
Colombia Enrique Forero, President Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales www.accefyn.org.co
Costa Rica Pedro León Azofeita, President Academia Nacional de Ciencias Costa Rica www.anc.cr
Cuba Luis Velázquez Pérez, President Academia de Ciencias de Cuba www.academiaciencias.cu WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 5
Ecuador Washington Benítez, President Academia de Ciencias del Ecuador www.academiadecienciasecuador.org
Dominican Republic Luis Scheker Ortiz, President Academia de Ciencias de la República Dominicana www.academiadecienciasrd.org
Guatemala María del Carmen Samayoa, President Academia de Ciencias Médicas, Físicas y Naturales de Guatemala www.interacademies.net/Academies/ByRegion/LatinAmericaCarribbean/Guatemala/
Honduras Mario Lanza, President Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Honduras www.guspepper.net/academia.htm
Mexico José Luis Morán López, President Academia Mexicana de Ciencias www.amc.unam.mx
Nicaragua María Luisa Acosta, President Academia de Ciencias de Nicaragua www.cienciasdenicaragua.org
Panama Martín Candanedo, President Asociación Panameña para el Avance de la Ciencia www.apanac.org.edu.pa
Peru Gustavo González, President Academia Nacional de Ciencias del Perú www.ancperu.org
United States of America Marcia McNutt, President The US-National Academy of Sciences www.nasonline.org
Uruguay Rafael Radi, President Academia Nacional de Ciencias de la República Oriental del Uruguay www.anciu.org.uy
Venezuela Gioconda San-Blas, President Academia de Ciencias Físicas, Matemáticas y Naturales de Venezuela www.acfiman.org.ve 6 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Contents
Foreword 10
A General Overview of Water Quality in the Americas 12
Important Aspects related to Water Quality Water and Society. The multidimensionality of water quality 20 María Luisa Torregrosa, Daniela de las Mercedes Arellano Acosta and Karina Kloster
Water and Health 27 Martín Forde, Ricardo Izurieta, Banu Ôrmeci, Mercedes Arellano and Kerry Mitchell
Biological Monitoring of Water Quality in the Americas 37 Ernesto González and Gabriel Roldán
Use of New Methodologies in Monitoring and Zoning Water Bodies in Argentina 51 César Luis García, Carlos Catalini and Carlos Marcelo Garcíae
On the subject of water quality in the Americas: Argentinas 57 Coordinators: Raúl A. Lopardo and Luis E. Higa. Authors: Emilio J Lentini, José María Regueira, Melina Tobías and Raúl A. Lopardo
Drinking Water Quality in Bolivia 77 Coordinador: Fernando Urquidi. Authors: Carlos D. España Vásquez and Fernando Urquidi
Water Quality In Brazil 104 Coordinators: José Tundisi y Carlos Bicudo. Authors: Adalberto Luís Val, Carlos E. de M. Bicudo, Denise de C. Bicudo, Diego Guimarães Florencio Fernando Rosado Spilki, Ina de Souza Nogueira, Ivanildo Hespanhol, José Almir Cirilo, José Galizia Tundisi, Pedro Val, Ricardo Hirata, Sandra Maria Feliciano de Oliveira e Azevedo, Silvio Crestana and Virginia S.T. Ciminelli.
Past, Present and Future Challenges to Management of Freshwater Quality in Canada 129 D. W. Schindler WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 7
Special Chapter 149 Water Quality and Alternative Energy Nexus in the Americas Kwame Emmanuel y Anthony Clayton. With the special contribution of Julián Despradel, Judith Franco, José María Rincón-Martínez, Diana Marcela Durán-Hernández, Melio Sáenz y Felipe Cisneros, Claudio Wheelock, Julio López de la Fuente, Erick Sandoval, Juan Rodríguez, Roberto Castello Tió and Mireya R. Goldwasser
Water Quality in Chile: Progress, Challenges and Perspectives 161 Coordinator: Pablo Pastén. Authors: Pablo Pastén, Alejandra Vega, Paula Guerra, Jaime Pizarro and Katherine Lizama
Water Quality in Colombia 192 Coordinator: Gabriel Roldán-Pérez. Authors: Gabriel Roldán-Pérez, Claudia Patricia Campuzano Ochoa, Diego Alejandro Chalarca, Francisco José Molina Pérez, Diana Catalina Rodríguez Loaiza, Carlos Augusto Benjumea- Hoyos, Silvia Lucía Villabona-González and María Isabel Ríos-Pulgarín.
Water Quality in Costa Rica 228 Coordinator: Hugo G. Hidalgo. Authors: Hugo G. Hidalgo, Monika Springer, Yamileth Astorga, Eddy Gómez, Ingrid Vargas and Édgar Meléndez
Water Quality in Cuba 255 Coordinator: Joaquín B. Gutiérrez Díaz. Authors: Joaquín B. Gutiérrez Díaz and Jorge Mario García Fernández
Water Quality in the Dominican Republic 271 Coordinator: Eleuterio Martínez. Authors: Eleuterio Martínez, Roberto Castillo Tió, Luis Reyes Tatis, Pedro de León and Luis Salcedo
Water Quality in Ecuador 303 Coordinator: Ricardo Izurieta. Authors: Ricardo Izurieta, Arturo Campaña, Juan Calles, Edmundo Estévez and Tatiana Ochoa
Water Quality in the Americas: El Salvador 326 Julio César Quiñónez Basagoitia 8 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Water Quality in the Americas: Caribbean-Grenada 355 Coordinator: Martin S. Forde. Authors: Kerry Mitchell, Martin S. Forde and Allan Neptune
Water Quality in Guatemala 268 Coordinator: Manuel Basterrechea. Authors: Manuel Basterrechea, Margaret Dix, Sharon van Tuylen, Ángela Méndez, Ligia Díaz, Pablo Mayorga and Norma Gil
Water Quality in Honduras 386 Coordinator: Marco Antonio Blair. Authors: Marco Antonio Blair, Pedro Ortiz, Mirna Argueta and Luis Romero
Water Quality in Mexico 408 Coordinators: Arsenio González Reynoso, Blanca Jiménez Cisneros, Jorge Eugenio Barrios Reynoso y Maria Luisa Torregrosa y Armentia. Authors: Adriana Carolina Flores-Díaz, Alma Chávez Mejía, Anne M. Hansen, Arsenio González Reynoso, Beatriz Casasola, Blanca Jiménez Cisneros, Blanca Lucía Prado Pano, Brenda Rodríguez Herrera, Daniel Murillo Licea, Erick D. Gutiérrez López, Fabiola Garduño, Gabriela Cabestany Ruiz, Ignacio González Mora, Itzkuauhtli Zamora Sáenz, Jorge Eugenio Barrios Reynoso, José Antonio Barrios Pérez, José Joel Carrillo Rivera, Juan Carlos Durán Álvarez, Juana Amalia Salgado López, Leopoldo G. Mendoza Espinosa, Lorenzo Gómez Morín, María Aurora Armienta Hernández, María del Pilar Saldaña Fabela, Mariana Zareth Nava-López, Marisa Mazari-Hiriart, María Luisa Torregrosa y Armentia, María Teresa Orta Ledezma Velásquez, Marinhe Concepción Rosas Rodríguez, Miguel Palmas Tenorios, Miguel A. Córdova Rodríguez, Miriam G. Ramos-Escobedo, Porfirio Hernández H, Ramón Pérez Gil Salcido, Ricardo Sandoval Minero, Robert Hunter Manson, Ronal Sawyer G., Sergio S. Ruiz-Córdova and Sofía Esperanza Garrido Hoyos
Special Chapter 432 Gender, Women and the Quality of Water Organized and edited by Frances Henry. Authors: Milena Cabrera Maldonado, Neela Badrie, Mónica Moraes R., María Eugenia García, Christina Villamar, Banu Örmeci and Dayra Álvarez
The Challenges of Protecting Water Quality in Nicaragua 454 Coordinator: Katherine Vammen. Authors: Katherine Vammen, Elizabeth Peña, Indiana García, Erick Sandoval, Mario Jiménez, Ivania Andrea Cornejo, Thelma Salvatierra, María José Zamorio, Claudio Wheelock, Analy Baltodano and Romer Altamirano WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 9
Water Quality in Panama 487 Coordinator: José R. Fábrega. Authors: José Fábrega, Elsa Flores, Manuel Zárate, Miroslava Morán, Denise Delvalle, Argentina Ying, Marilyn Diéguez, Euclides Deago and Kathia Broce
Peru: the double challenge of water quality and water security 516 Coordinator: Nicole Bernex. Authors: Nicole Bernex, James Apaéstegui, Betty Chung, María Luisa Castro de Esparza, José Bauer, Raúl Espinoza, César Vidal, Pablo Tsukayama, Martín Cabello-Vílchez and Katiusca Yakabi
Water Quality and its Management in the United States of America 542 Henry Vaux, Jr.
Water Quality in Uruguay: Current status and challenges 562 Coordinators: Jimena Alonso, Federico Quintans, Javier Taks and Daniel Conde. Authors: Jimena Alonso, Federico Quintans, Javier Taks, Daniel Conde, Guillermo Chalar, Sylvia Bonilla, Rafael Arocena, Signe Haakonsson, Luis Aubriot, Guillermo Goyenola, Pablo Muniz, Analía Marrero, Marisa Hutton, Natalia Venturini, Ana Laura Pita, Karen Iglesias, Mariana Ríos, Natalia Zaldúa, Franco Teixeira de Mello, Alvaro Soutullo, Gabriela Eguren, Matías Victoria, Fernando López Tort, Leticia Maya, Matías Castells, María José Benitez, Andrés Lizasoain, Estefany Bertoni, Viviana Bortagaray, Matías Salvo, Rodney Colina, Karina Azuriz, Natalia Castagnet, Victoria Evia, Ana Fernández, Ximena Lagos, Laura Marrero, Fernanda Milans, Matías Piaggio, Nicolás Rezzano, Julieta López, Lorena Rodríguez, Saúl Garat, Margarita Pintos, Alejandro Iriburo, Beatriz Brena and Hernán Méndez
Water Quality in Venezuela 600 Coordinator: Ernesto J. González. Authors: Ernesto José González Rivas, Eduardo Buroz Castillo, Rafael Lairet Centeno, María Virginia Najul, Henry Blanco, Rebeca Sánchez, Jorge Paolini, Ramón Montero, Haymara Álvarez, Simón Astiz, Carlos Espinosa Jiménez, Vecellio Focà, Miguel Ángel Cabeza Díaz, Silvana Vielma Angarita, Lucas Riestra, Antonio Machado-Allison and Pedro R. García Montero 10 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Foreword
This volume is the product of a collaborative effort between the Water Committee of the InterAmerican Network of Academies of Science (IANAS) and the International Hydrology -
AmericasProgram ofentitled UNESCO. Diagnosis It is the of Waterlatest ofin thethree Americas publications resulting from this ongoing col waterslaboration. entitled Earlier Urban efforts Water: include Challenges a comprehensive in the Americas overview of the water resources of the , published in 2013 and a study of urban managers, scholars and the public throughout the Americas, published and globally. in 2015. There All theseis every works rea- sonhave to been expect published that this in collaboration both English will and continue Spanish andto make build them on its widely successful available past into the water fu-
in bringing this volume and its predecessors to fruition and look forward to the continued successture. The of editors the collaboration. of this volume are grateful for the support of their colleagues from UNESCO In the present book, focused on the problems and management of Water Quality, there
- has been close collaboration with the Regional Bureau for Sciences in Latin America and the Caribbean of UNESCO in Montevideo, specifically with the International Hydrological Pro gram for Latin America and the Caribbean (IHP-LAC) and the IHP Regional Hydrologist for LAC, Dr. Miguel de Franco Doria. It is important to mention that a series of meetings were- held to support the preparation, organization and publication of this book: the IANAS Water- edProgram by the andCentro UNESCO de Ciencias in Irvine, y Tecnología California de(USA, Antioquia September (Center 2015, of Water Science Quality and technology in the Amer of icas Workshop); the International Water Fair in November 2016 in Medellín, Colombia host-
Antioquia) and the Colombian Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences; the Meet ing of the Water Program in Ottawa hosted by the Royal Society of Canada, The Academies of Arts, Humanities and Sciences of Canada and Carlton University (August, 2017); Sharing Water: From Local to Global focusing on Water Quality in the Americas (Ipatinga, Brazil,- February, 2018) hosted by UNESCO-IHP; the World Water Forum, Brasilia, the Presentation of Urban Waters Challenges in the Americas (March, 2018) supported by the Brazilian Acad- emy of Sciences and the UNESCO Latin America-Caribbean Regional Training Workshop on EmergingWe would Pollutants like to inacknowledge Water Resources the support organized from by the the Conferencia UNESCO-IHP de InternationalDirectores del Initia Agua (Spanishtive on Water acronym-CODIA), Quality (IIWQ) which in Campinas, is active Brazil,in promoting in December, the dissemination 2018. of technical, sci- - tion, particularly as regards the production of various promotional materials linked to this publication.entific, social and environmental knowledge in water resources for supporting this publica
https://www.ianas.org/index.php/books/ianas-publications IANAS provides free public access to these publications in: WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 11 12 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
A General Overview of Water Quality in the Americas
Co-Chairs of the IANAS Water Program Katherine Vammen (Nicaragua) and Henry Vaux (USA)
Water resources are a key component supporting and strengthening sustainable develop- ment in the American hemisphere and globally. “Water Quality in the Americas: Risks and Opportunities” - - pects of water science, brings togetherproduced a this unified assessment effort by from the Academies the perspective of Sciences of the fromAcademies 21 coun of tries of the Americas. A team of 148 authors from all 21 countries, experts in different as- gestions for better management. The book provides an overview of surface and groundwa- terScience, quality with and the impacts objective on humanof analyzing consumption, specific problems agriculture of andwater ecosystem quality and services offering in eachsug country, thereby creating a hemisphere-wide picture of the current status and future chal- lenges for the quality of essential water resources. This overview will facilitate the creation of new management concepts and the introduction of best practices in our diverse hemi- sphere. The book considers areas of abundance and scarcity of water resources, ranging from temperate to tropical conditions and puts water resource development in the context of the great diversity of economic and social development in the Americas. It deals with the different impacts of industrial and human activity in both urban and rural areas, problems involved in potable water and wastewater treatment, and in particular, each country´s insti- tutional and professional capacities to improve water governance. In the beginning, management concepts were focused more on water balance in the
impacts that affect water quality, and in turn the availability of the resource, for different usesdifferent leading watersheds; to problems but oftoday, water availability security for is theclearly human being population influenced and by for anthropogenic ecosystems. The restoration of water quality involves many aspects from the protection of watersheds at all levels to assuring improved environmental laws and their enforcement, all aimed at reducing risks and vulnerability to assure water security. Science has a key role in develop- ing evidence-based recommendations to assure water quality leading to better policies and their timely implementation. It is imperative to improve the management of water resourc- - source conditions of each country as they address their particular water quality problems. es throughout the Americas and to improve and better adapt governance to the specific re- allel to changes in human activities, population growth, urbanization, industrialization and progressiveGlobally, shifts the deterioration in land use. Pollutants of water quality are continuously has gone through more complex a process and of can change be direct par-
- systemly related services. to human Water health quality and deteriorationsignificant impacts is due on to thehuman environment. impacts, whichThis results began inwith an fecalincrease and inorganic costs forcontamination treatment for at purificationa time when of water water treatment and wastewaters was extremely and affects limited eco in
the 1800s and was followed by an increase in metal pollution with special characteristics WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 13
of bioaccumulation in aquatic ecosystems into the all marine environments of the world” and covers - put of nutrients into receiving waterbodies, eutro- phication1900s. Beginning processes in the were 1960s observed with the throughout increasing the in biotaan “area due of to seven the diversity million squareof water kilometers” types together (see continent, which eventually reached levels causing withChapter seasonal on Brazil). variation The throughout adaptation ofthe the evolution aquatic- cyanobacteria blooms resulting in cyanotoxin re- ary process has produced a unique combination of lease into the water of lakes and reservoirs. From biodiversity. Human impacts on the water quality of the Amazon basin are threatening water quality and lakes in South America, public concern was grow- biodiversity due mainly to certain mining activities, theing, Greatand theLakes rapid of North proliferation America toof reservoirs algal blooms and urban impact and changes in land use (see Chapter - - tersheds in the region is, in many cases, similar or idwas developments increasingly subjectin chemical to studies. methods (Tundisi, and equip 2015;- worse.Brazil for Targeting more details. the Amazon The situation basin when in other there waare ment”Schindler, (see 1977). chapter “These on Canada)studies wereand theseaided advancby rap- worse cases-in North and South America-could be es were quickly adopted by research teams looking misinterpreted to identify and solve water pollution throughout There are new emerging risks for water qual- the Americas, from the north of Canada to South ity that need special attention and are the subject America. - It became increasingly clear after some decades taminants are present in surface and groundwa- of studies that both point and non-point sources terof evaluationsources which in someoriginate chapters. from drugs, Emergent cosmetics, con - antibiotics, hormones, nanomaterials and other in- es (e.g. factories, sewage outfalls) without adequate puts which present new threats to human health, wasteare important treatment causes were ofcausing pollution: eutrophication; (1) point sourc and biodiversity and ecosystems. These need closer analyses in the near future. Certain industrial min- were the sources of the input of phosphorus, nitro- ing extraction methods initiated in the last decades gen(2) non-point and other agrochemicalsources and run into off major from waterbodies. agriculture such as sand tar mining and fracking in vulnerable Organic chemicals became widely used in agricul- areas are producing new risks for water resources ture. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs), herbi- that could have consequences for water quality and cides and insecticides and the increase of uncon- therefore for human health. trolled use of fertilizers became a major source of pollution in water resources, surface- and ground- - water. Changes in land use, which promoted defor- ter sourcesGlobal climate which werechange once also perennial has multiple now effects suffer estation for expansion of agriculture and livestock fromon water drought quality. periods Extreme leading events to a greater mean that concen wa- production, also created widespread sedimentation tration of pollutants with consequences for aquat- - coastal lagoons. All these processes affected wa- ter quantity in some areas has meant the use of the into surface waters: lakes, reservoirs, rivers and sameic biota water and sourcepublic waterfor both supplies. water withdrawalsInsufficient wa for in quality of ecosystems which support water re- human consumption and irrigation and at the same ter for human consumption and led to a “reduction time for waste disposal (see Chapter on Canada). Additionally, the integrity of key zones of protection - forsources water and bodies maintain such their as riparian quality” zones, (Tundisi, wetlands 2015). tities of sedimentation and extreme events such as and others such as the extremely delicate areas of hurricanesOn the other tend hand, to floodingdestroy bringshydrological in large systems quan recharge for groundwater and pristine sources of due to massive deforestation and extreme changes hydrological systems was compromised. (sedimentation and siltation) in river and lake ba- The American continent has many special areas of global importance for climate and great hydro- nutrients which are weakly bound in sediments cansins bedrastically released affectinginto the waterflow regimes. in these Metalsevents. and In- - creases in the temperature of surface waters have logical significance. One feature, the Amazon River, stands out as it flows for “6,992km and discharg es close to 20% of all the freshwater that reaches already caused an intensification of cyanobacterial 14 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
blooms as these species adapt rapidly to higher wa- it relatively easy to enforce regulatory standards. ter temperatures and dominate the biodiversity of Non-point source pollution includes run-off from phytoplankton in the aquatic ecosystems. Climate watershed lands that have been eroded or other-
example, mercury can be released to downstream agricultural lands that contains the residues of ag- warming also influences metal contamination, for- riculturalwise heavily chemicals modified including or denuded; fertilizers run-off and pesti from- mafrost environments (for example in Canada, cides; run-off and particularly storm water run-off watersand warming after forest can also fires lead or disappearanceto reconcentration of per of from urban landscapes that contains all manner of contaminants). chemicals including hydrocarbons and sediment.
intended to contribute to a greater understanding Agricultural Chemicals. Agricultural chemicals – of currentThis volume threats of andWater impacts Quality to in water the Americas resources. is The analyses therein are summarized in the follow- control both because the chemicals themselves may ing sections. bemainly damaging fertilizers to the and environment pesticides –or arehuman difficult health to and are frequently not evaluated prior to commer- cial release. In addition, decisions relating to how Water Quality Problems much of a chemical to apply tend to be decentral- of the Americas ized and there is a tendency to apply more than is needed with the result that the quantities of chem- icals in the run-off can be even greater than if the Eutrophication - Virtually every country in the Americas experienc- ricultural lands has been implicated as the cause of quantities applied were optimal. Run-off from ag- waterways and water bodies. Frequently, the eu- phication is especially severe. trophicationes some degree in question of artificial is characterized eutrophication as cultural in its “dead zones” found in waters where cultural eutro eutrophication meaning that the phenomena is ar- Cyanobacterial Blooms and Toxins. A particularly in- sidious manifestation of eutrophication involves cy- waters that are discharged by agricultural and in- anobacteria, which are photosynthesizing bacteria, dustrialtificially activitiesestablished rather by an than excess occurring of nutrients exclusively in the found naturally in terrestrial and aquatic habitats from natural sources. The results are varied and in- clude algal blooms that are sometimes toxic and de- extreme levels of eutrophication and featuring spe- plete dissolved oxygen. Cultural eutrophication can around the world. Under conditions that include render the water unsuitable for drinking and other blooms release toxins that are dangerous to ani- purposes and destabilize the aquatic ecosystem in mals,cific strains some forms of cyanobacteria, of plant life theand associatedhumans. These algal question. Such destabilization frequently results in toxins have been known to cause death in humans. algal blooms with the subsequent release of toxins The potential for such blooms exists throughout the - Americas and is one extreme of the sort of contam- house gas production in water reservoirs should ination that severe cultural eutrophication can lead alsoand explosivebe noted. growth of unwanted species. Green to.
Non-point source pollution. Chemical Contamination though not always, caused by non-point source pol- The number of chemicals with the potential to con- lution, which by itself creates Eutrophication vexing water is quality often, taminate waterways and water bodies is almost problems in virtually every country of the Ameri- limitless. Contamination of water with chemicals is cas. Non-point source pollution involves pollutants ubiquitous and is found throughout the Americas in varying degrees of severity. to regulate directly because it is impossible to iden- that originate from diffuse sources that are difficult- Emerging Contaminants. New chemicals emerge ev- ery day in the agricultural, industrial and technol- tify points of origin. By contrast, point source pollu tion emanates from an identifiable location making WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 15
ogy sectors. Although these products are intended Salinization. All naturally occurring waters contain to offer solutions to various problems, many appear some salts. When water is evaporated, or trans- soon afterwards in waterways and water bodies as pired in the case of agriculture, the salts remain. In well as on the land. This appearance occurs before irrigated agriculture, some salinization is evitable much is known about their health and environmen- and unless it is attended to it will ultimately reduce tal impacts. No country in the Americas currently the productivity of the soils in question ending with has the capacity to evaluate emerging contaminants a total loss of soil productivity. The remedy is to either before or after their release into the environ- leach periodically the salts from the root zone. This ment. The ultimate implications of this situation are requires water in addition to that necessary to sup- totally unknown but it is clear that the prospects for port the crop. In arid regions throughout the Ameri- dangerous and even deadly waterborne health im- cas salinization of agricultural lands is a threat. The pacts rise with each passing day. waters to counteract salinization through leaching may not be available in arid and semi-arid regions. Toxic Chemicals. The lack of capacity to evaluate Sea water intrusion, which occurs when coastal emerging new contaminants means that the in- and near coastal aquifers are overdrawn, is anoth- ability to discriminate between toxic and non-tox- er form of water quality degradation. This is dealt ic chemicals increases the threat to human health with in the section on groundwater below. and well-being. There is particular concern about - the fact that newly emerging chemicals or their me- equate disposal of urban solid waste and untreat- tabolites may react with chemicals already in the ed industrialContamination residue due in togarbage Urban dumps Waste. can The lead inad to environment to produce toxins that are even more contamination of groundwater due to leaching pro- dangerous than the original chemical. In addition, - the failure to evaluate the impacts of discharging ate this process, transmitting various substances toxic chemicals into water means that the potential harmfulcesses. Rain to human and the health, humidity including of residues carcinogenic acceler long-term impacts are poorly understood or not and toxic substances. understood at all. The resources needed to assess the long-term implications of chemicals that may Mining and Other Industrial Wastes. Mining and other not be immediately toxic are simply not available in industrial wastes pose high risks to water quality most of the countries of the Americas. because of the concentration of metallic and oth- er compounds which can be mobilized by precipi- Acid Rain. It is well established that emissions from tation and water transport through the soil. These the combustion of fossil fuels released into the at- wastes can be particularly vexing to manage be- mosphere can cause increases -and perhaps sig- cause sources are sometimes diffuse – as with acid
Increasing the acidity of precipitation has adverse the ownership of them. In countries with devel- effectsnificant on increases aquatic –habitats in the acidityand may of precipitation.result in bio- opedmine economies,drainage – andsuch it wastes is often are difficult typically to identifycleaned logical destabilization of those habitats. Acid rain up at very high cost. Countries with less robust economies will rarely be able to defray the costs of through destruction of protective paints and oth- clean-up. can also cause significant damage in urban areas acidic rain are often felt at locations that are remote Natural Contamination. Natural contamination also fromer coatings. the places Significantly, where the the causative impacts emissions of increasing oc- creates threats to water quality. Among the most cur. This means that the emitting party frequently has no incentive to ameliorate the offending dis- and arsenic. These contaminants are usually found charges. This problem is more pronounced in re- inprominent soils and ofrocks the contaminantsand are mobilized are fluorides,through rainfall boron gions of the Americas that rely exclusively on the and other weathering events. Fluorides are ubiqui- burning of fossil fuels with a high sulphur content tous in the soil and water environment and are rel- and the generation of NOx (Nitrogen Oxides) for atively harmless at low concentrations. However, production of electricity and other commodities. they can be toxic at higher concentrations even in 16 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
shed lands and waterways can lead to excessive and at higher concentrations can be toxic to plants mobilization of sediments and accelerated rates includingnature. Boron crop is plants. typically Arsenic present is intoxic soil to and humans water - and body burdens of arsenic are cumulative so even ment can destroy aquatic habitats, shorten the life the ingestion of water with low arsenic concentra- of sediment transport. Excessive amounts of sedi would otherwise be available to store water and renderof dams the by prematurelywater unsuitable filling for reservoir some uses. space Indis that- managetions over because time can they have typically significant come toxic from impacts. diffuse criminate land conversion as with the development Natural contaminations of all sorts are difficult to of agricultural lands, clear cutting and modifying such as volcanic origins. sources and from specific geological formations, can all lead to excessive sedimentation. Activities Biological and other non- thatland surfaceincrease in the ways rate that of increase sedimentation water flow occur runoff on Chemical Contaminants lands throughout the Americas with the result that Microbes and other biological contaminants are sediment mobilization and transport will increase well known. There are other contaminants that and cause degradation of surface water quality. may or may not have biological properties that pose threats to water quality. Microbial contamination. in the provision of potable water supplies, micro- Invasive Species. The advent of transportation tech- bial contamination continuesIn spite to ofthreaten significant the gainsqual- nology resulted in an ever more tightly linked globe. In such circumstances it was almost inevitable that mismanagement of watershed lands threatens the organisms could move from the accustomed habi- qualitativeity of many integrity of these of water supplies. from Modification those lands. The and tats where they had evolved to more distant hab- absence of well-functioning and operated treat- itats that they could colonize. The more distant ment facilities and the failure to maintain and re- habitats lacked the predators and/or environmen- new existing facilities increases the possibilities for tal conditions that had tended to keep population microbial contamination. No country in the Ameri- numbers stable in the original habitat. The result cas is free of concerns about eliminating microbial was frequently a population explosion in the new contamination of potable water supplies although habitat that continued until it could no longer be the situation is worse in some countries than oth- supported, and the population numbers crashed. considered in monitoring programs. This situation also invite the invasion of other species for a vari- deterioratesers. Both bacterial further and due viral to exposure pollution to need untreated to be Modified landscapes and aquatic environments liquid urban waste and agriculture. damage to the environmental integrity of an aquat- icety habitat of reasons. affecting Invasive trophic species levels can in the do ecosystem,significant Adequate sanitation. Many countries in the Ameri- leading in some cases to the extinction of import- cas have made impressive gains in the provision of sanitation service over the past decades. This has devoted to the management of invasive species to entailed the construction of wastewater treatment counteractant species. the Significant substantial resources damage have that already they can been in- facilities and the development of a cadre of workers - who can operate them. Still many countries of the ronmental changes suggests that invasive species Americas are behind in the coverage of sanitation willflict. appearThe advent throughout of global the warming Americas and (and other the envi rest in urban areas and when existent lack adequate of the globe) with increasing frequency and atten- - dant increases in the cost of control. Such invasion ing bodies and therefore cause further pollution to will affect aquatic habitats. treatment before the effluents enter into receiv problem, even in countries where total coverage is Sedimentation. Sedimentation is a natural process reasonablyimportant waterbodies. high. Maintenance Rural sanitationand renewal remains of sani a- of wearing down the landscape and transporting the material. However, mismanagement of water- over time because of high cost and popular apathy. tation facilities may become a significant problem WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 17
Groundwater The importance of groundwater as a potential material discharged as waste to the environment source of supply and the management of it to pro- is approximately equal to the mass of material that tect both available quantities and good quality has enters into production processes. This means that been largely neglected throughout the Americas. It there are only two ways in which the volume of pol- is not widely appreciated that it is almost always cheaper to protect groundwater quality than it is to - lutants can be reduced: 1) reduce the throughput- ticedor 2) torecycle one degree and reuse or another the materials throughout that theare hemibeing- thatclean most it up contaminantsafter it has been come contaminated. from diffuse Ground sourc- sphere,discharged but intothe scale the environment. of recycling programs Recycling needs is prac to eswater and quality that contamination protection is made moves difficult underground by the fact at be increased. Similarly, it is important to note that waste sinks – water, air and land – are interconnect- monitor. In general, groundwater quality must be ed so that a reduction of quality in one sink implies manageddifferent ratesindirectly which by are specifying difficult aand set expensiveof best man to- an increase in quality in the others. Programs that agement practices to govern activities that are un- - dertaken in recharge areas. A well-designed set of ed States – simply move the wastes around and fail practices will minimize or eliminate the possibility toare acknowledge sink specific the– such fact as that some sinks of thoseare essential, in the Unit yet of contaminants from reaching the aquifer in ques- largely absent throughout the Americas. tion. Well-head protection programs are especial- ly important inasmuch as contaminants can reach Monitoring No pollution management program can be suc- down wells. cessfully mounted without some information on the Agroundwater special problem almost occurs instantaneous where coastal if they aqui flow- the state and quality of the aquatic environment. A fers are overdrafted (more is extracted than re- charged) and the level of the water table drops. water quality. In spite of this fact the level of moni- When that level falls below sea level, sea water may toringminimum in virtually of data isevery needed country about of water the Americas flows and is intrude into the aquifer. Progressive salinization of inadequate. Where data is inadequate the manage- the aquifer then results if remedial actions are not ment problem becomes one of managing risk and taken. The obvious remedy is to eliminate the over- draft and allow the water table to recover. Other monitoring as well as research to determine the methods of hydrologic manipulation, which require riskuncertainty. associated Risk with management different pollutants. also requires Monitor some- additional water supplies have been employed suc- ing and data generation must usually be undertak- en by the central government because of the inter- remedy, but it is very costly. cessfully. Artificial desalination is another potential collectiondependency and of watersanalyses flowing lack political between appeal States and Managing Water Quality thereforeProvinces. are The usually difficulty inadequate is that to programs the task at of hand. data in the Americas No country in the Americas is totally successful in Research Programs developed countries as well as those that are de- upon the science of water quality. As economic and managingveloping. The water ingredients quality. This of a findingsuccessful includes manage the- populationEffective management growth proceed, programs the water should quality be basedman- ment program are well known and are summarized agement problem becomes more extensive and below. - search in order to understand both the nature of the Recycling and Reuse problemmore complicated. and appropriate This requires measures more to scientific combat reit.
investment is inadequate in virtually every country The Principle of Materials Balance, derived from the Research programs require public investment. Such Law of Conservation of Mass, holds that the mass of 18 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
The Dimensions of Water Quality: Society, Health, Women, Energy and Monitoring of the Americas. At stake is the cost and effective- As water quality depends on human activities and ness of existing and future programs of pollution directly acts on human health, this book contains management and abatement. A robust program of research has the advantage of keeping scientists in - contact with their colleagues throughout the hemi- subchapters dealing with these important aspects: above,“Water in and order Society: to understand The Multidimensions the state of ofwater Wa other countries is available to all. qualityter Quality” in the and different “Water andresources Health”. and As itsmentioned levels it sphere so that scientific knowledge generated in is essential to develop improved monitoring pro- Policy Making and Governance grams. Two subchapters on special monitoring as- Programs of effective pollution management re- quire explicit statements of policy goals and poli- - cies and rules for achieving those goals. Thus, for giespects in have monitoring been included: and zoning “Biological plans forMonitoring waterbod of- example, the statement of goals needs to enumer- ies”Water which Quality give and examples “Application of important of new components methodolo ate whether the pollution control strategy will en- and methodologies for future monitoring programs. tail direct government controls, a more indirect in- The importance of the role of women in secur- centive based system or some mixture of the two. ing water quality in the home and in industry and It is important to recognize that merely develop- agriculture, is a topic which is not always dealt with - and therefore the Women in Science program of vised to select the level of the standard and solve - theing aproblems standard of is compliance not sufficient. and Policies enforcement. must be Com de- prehensive pollution control policies will normally IANAS, which is also in line with the priority of UN ESCO related to gender equality, have contributed- based incentives such as tradable pollution per- a special feature chapter “Gender, Women and the have components covering: 1) education; 2) price Caribbean,Quality of Water” which dealingdemonstrate with experiencesthe importance in sev of enforcement mechanisms. watereral developing quality and countries the treatment of Latin of America wastewaters and the in mits:Managing 3) a system water of standards quality also and requires 4) a hierarchy an effec of- the lives of women. tive array of institutions to establish the policies, - monitor the results and enforce the resultant stan- ies in most countries represented in IANAS to de- dards and policies. Institutions include laws, public termineThe Energywhether Program there has carried been progress out small on stud the agencies, appropriate policies and appropriate en- use of renewable energy in assuring water quality. forcement mechanisms. Strong institutions that are - - ture chapter which illustrate some examples in the sources, are an essential part of any effective pollu- Americas.These findings have been presented in a special fea tionreliable, control and programs, with adequate yet they human are largelyand financial absent re in the Americas. Referencias Sustainable Development Goal 6: Target 6.3 Water Quality - - itation in lakes. Science gal waste disposal and hazardous chemical mate- Schindler, D.W. (1977). Evolution of phosphorus lim Targetrials with 6.3 dealsa special with mention reducing to contamination, cutting untreated ille 195, pp. 260-262. - wastewater by half and increasing recycling and Tundisi, J.G.; Matsumuro-Tundisi, T.; Ciminelli, V.S. & Barbosa, F.A. (2015). Water availability, wa challenges and includes some examples of efforts to ter quality water governance: the future ahead.- promotesafe reuse. reuse Each especially country chapterefforts indeals countries with these with Hydrological Sciences and Water Security: IAHSPast, less abundance of water. Publ.Present and Future. (Proceedings of the 11th Ko vacs Colloquium, Paris, Francia, June 2014). 366, 2015. WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 19
Important Aspects Related to Water Quality 20 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Water and Society The multidimensionality of water quality
María Luisa Torregrosa (Mexico), Daniela de las Mercedes Arellano Acosta (Cuba) and Karina Kloster (Mexico)
Introduction
Addressing problems related to water quality in the region is not an easy task. Despite the
many efforts made by various governments since the 1970s, the delay of many countries in- mousexpanding heterogeneity water and in sanitation the forms ofservices access toin water.sufficient There quantity is still aand large quality, sector particularly of the popula in- tionthe peri-urban located in marginaland rural and communities, peri-urban remains. areas that Particularly access water in Latin through America, tanker there trucks, is enor low- cost plastic carboys from nearby unsafe sources, among others, all of which are unreliable 1 without mentioning the risks to which the rural population is subject due to the high degree of contamination of sources due to problems of eutrophicationregarding water or quality other types(Jiménez, of pollution 2009), that are increased by the absence of drainage and
countries,the forms ofin finaladdition disposal to those of gray derived water from and the sewage. lack of investment to maintain and improve infrastructure.In urban settlements, Many cities this still finallack drainagedisposal isand a sanitationproblem that systems, persists and in when Latin they American do ex- ist, they are often either not operated correctly or never begin operating.
- dustriesLikewise, -particularly the absence extractive or limitation industries-, of regulatory and agriculture, frameworks which and has their had applicationmajor conse in- quencesterms of forsanitation the water persists, quality together of our countries. with the final disposal of wastewater from cities, in Another important obstacle to improving the water quality of many of our countries is the delay in or, at worst, absence of reliable data indicating the current quality. Data on san- itation services often only refer to the sewage disposed through sewerage services without -
contaminatedconsidering its sources treatment, and thathigh of rates gray of water waterborne and its safediseases final indisposal the population. in the receiving bod ies. This has significant consequences and an incidence that is reflected in the amount of connected to networks or obtained by other means, has led people to resort to the purchase of bottled These water, deficiencies which inis unregulatedthe quality of and the for water which supplied there is to no the certainty population, about whether the quality it is -
that it distributes (Pacheco-Vega, 2017). Alternatively, they purchase home water purifica tion systems, which increases the cost of this resource by 30 or 50% over the official price, 1. Independent studies undertaken by academic institutions reveal that, although a high percentage of water is - ence of microorganisms and chlorine residues ( Jiménez et al., 2002). chlorinated, of the water received in homes, only 30% of the cases meet the requirements established for the pres WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 21
which is generally assumed by the more disadvan- Box 1 taged sectors of the population or, failing that, they Access to water in quantity and quality for all sectors pay the health costs of being unable to purify water. of society can only be achieved by adopting an inte- - grated, multidimensional approach in which the pro- - vision of water and sanitation services is organized Looking at these results, we should ask our ter quality in our countries? What do we need to through a wide array of institutional, formal and in- selves: Why is it so difficult to obtain good wa achieve this? What are the crucial factors for reduc- formal arrangements , which take into account the - various characteristics and local conditions. lationship between water and sanitation services anding the the water availability and sanitation of water deficit?and technologies, What is the eco re- nomic status, legal framework, institutional capaci- ty and water policies? There are multiple formal and informal water that provide it and confront it with the unilateral supply strategies that have proven to be success- institutional construction of what is considered wa- ful in both developed and developing countries, ter and its quality. ranging from state or municipal public manage- This leads us to consider issues that could shed ment, public-private participation and cooperative - models to community management, among others lationship between water and society , the forms of waterlight on governance the difficulties and thethis power implies, relations such as embed the re- et al et al ded in them. (Torregrosa and Jiménez 2009:348, Hukka and Kat- ko,water 2009, and Pietilä sanitation, ., 2009,the problems Muradian we face., 2013). are evenIn the more case complexof the final and disposal often transcend of gray and the black pos- How do we conceive the relationship sibilities of being resolved at the community level. between water and society? with wastewater removal at the community level One of the ways in which the relationship between butThere very have few been of coping significant with experiences and solving of sanitation working water and society has been conceived is through the idea of governance. The idea would be that a good This suggests that the problem of water quality water government would pay for the existence of liesproblems. in the Thismultiplicity is reflected of factors in water that quality. determine it. institutions that make it possible to guarantee wa- We are used to addressing water-related problems - in a fragmented way, from different specialties or itants, based on the idea that governance is pro- videdter in sufficientby the way quantity policies and regulate quality and for coordinate all inhab water quality is complex and multidimensional. In the management of natural, economic and social thisfields respect, of experience. they are But not solving only economic, problems technolog related to- resources and, on this basis, assuming the propos- ical or institutional issues. It is important to explore 2 - other rarely considered aspects, which may be af- - fecting the obtainment of better water quality. alistrative made bysystems UNESCO that that are operating“water governance and directly is de or This also raises the question or institutional is- indirectlyfined by the affect political, the use, social, development economic and and manage admin- ment of water resources, as well as the distribution ways of understanding, seeing and solving prob- of water supply services at various levels of society” lemssues Whyrelated is itto so water difficult and to sanitation interact with and differentto make these differences part of public policy? One way to approach the issue may be from the transparency,(Global Water predictabilityPartnership, 2003). and receptivity, The following as nec is a- perspective of the social nature of water, which essaryreflection conditions on inclusion, for good responsibility, governance participation, and an effec- would give us the possibility of thinking about the quality of water produced socially from the culture, knowledge, practices, ideas, meanings and values com/Titan/Titanokeanos.html 2. http://www.waterhistory.org/histories/nile and www.theoi. 22 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
tive relationship between water and society, rarely 1.4 Transparency Transparency is one of the principles of effective In- 1.observed Necessary in Latin conditions America today. for water stitutions should work openly. They should use lan- governance guagegovernance, that is asunderstandable shown in the andfollowing accessible, quote: so that“ the general public has more confidence in complex 1.1 Inclusion institutions. In addition to being open, good gover- A review of the contents of the Hague Ministerial nance requires that all policy decisions be transpar- Declaration held at the beginning of this century ent, so that both those who are directly involved and wisely those who are not can easily follow the steps taken governing water in order to ensure good governance, in policy design. This is particularly important as re- so(2000) as to referred involve theto this public aspect and andensure called that for the “ inter- gards financial transactions” (Alcocer et al ests of all stakeholder groups are included in water For these transactions, transparency is vital, since resource management”. it contributes to overcoming the challenge societies., 1988). This rules out any initiative establishing bor- face for dealing with corruption. One cannot ignore ders for the guarantee of water service in quantity the fact that transparency is built on the basis of the and quality, among those living in marginal areas, indigenous communities or suburban areas and re- siding in neighborhoods or any other type of prop- 1.5free Predictability flow of information. - mation about all the scenarios linked to water re- 1.2erty Responsibility owned by more affluent social sectors. sourceHaving management,representative, constitutes reliable and the sufficient basis for infor con- Water resource management entails responsibili- ducting the analyses (technical economic, cost/ ties for society as a whole, which must be includ- ed in the principles and legal bases on which this predict, at the temporal and spatial level, how and management is based. This responsibility includes whenbenefits, the budgetary competent and institutions financial, will etc.) have required the nec to- the prevention of pollution by all social actors, and and investments related to the storage, protection system adopted. The responsibility associated with andessary distribution financial resourcesof these resources, to undertake as wellthe worksas for effectiveaspects related water governanceto the financial demands sustainability that the of roles the their treatment at the stage when they become residual. Without justifying those governments whose One good practice worth highlighting, estab- interestof these inactors sustainable be defined. water resource management lished in Cuba and validated by the work undertak- is only evident in their discourse in electoral pro- - cesses and campaigns, there is generally a limited tion (twice a year) of inland water quality, through perception of individual responsibilities in terms of aen network over the thatpast 50has years, a number is the systematicof stations observa totaling the management and protection of water resources. these stations classify as basic (generating descrip- 1.3 Participation tive,between long-term 2 400 informationand 3 500. Seventy-five on the most per important cent of Water resource management is carried out on the basis of the interests and participation of society as correspond to control and monitoring stations, a whole, regardless of the social strata of its mem- mostlywaterbodies associated in the with country), surface while waters, the otherincluding 25% bers. Accordingly, governments at all levels must residual discharge. develop an inclusive approach during the formu- The inventory of polluting sources of inland wa- lation and implementation of policies related to ters, which serves as a tool for the surveillance and these resources. In terms of effective water gover- control of their quality and the exercise of the re- nance, participation is developed on the basis of sponsibility that concerns the state in terms of the social mobilization and the ability to exercise this sustainable management of this resource, has iden- constructively.
tified 2 260 main polluting sources of inland waters. WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 23
This information, based on real data, serves as Box 2 input for the adoption of the policies to be imple- The notion of the hydrosocial cycle is constructed in op- mented in the short, medium and long terms, so position to the conventional use of the water cycle, which that the institutions responsible for these actions “continues eternally with or without human activity”, and can complete them with the corresponding respon- points to a static and reified notion of this cycle as Maid- sibility. In fact, predictability is an effective ally of ment (1993) points out (Linton, 2010:231 ). In the opposite responsibility. direction, the water cycle “proposes a science whose field is defined between the hydrological and the social and is 1.6. Receptivity therefore presented as a means of producing critical knowl- edge about the social nature of water,” says Maidment (Lar- heavily on the effectiveness of the mechanisms in- simont and Grosso, 2014:8). stitutionsReceptivity have in waterfor receiving resource information management from relies the lowest levels at which they provide water of the ap- propriate quality. An effective information system is built on the foundations of social mobilization and freedom of expression for its social appropriation. - On the basis of the previous elements, we think fersfirst to characteristic its deterritorialization, assumes that3 in water other underwords, any its that the problem of water quality, like many others on spatialcircumstance delocalization; can be reduced and lastly, to H2O; it warns the second us about re the agendas of the governments of several countries its dematerialization, in other words, the fact that in the region, emerges when each of these points is the conquest of water through its abstraction and evaluated and it becomes clear that although ideas technical control has destroyed the relationship on water governance assume the desirable image of water management, the way they operate in practice particular territories. is far from ideal. The way water governance occurs specificIn short, social from groups this had perspective, -or have-, what with the water mod in- is based on power relations that subordinate the de- ern construction of water ignores is its social na- cision-making power of some to the detriment of ture, and as a result, it deprives society of the abili- political agendas that do not necessarily correspond ty to think of itself as a producer of water and of its to the ideals of inclusion. In this respect, the func- quality. tioning of society can be said to pose obstacles to the Accordingly, the starting point for the discus- achievement of good water governance. sion is repeated, emphasizing that the nature of water is based on the ways society produces water 2. Alienation as an inhibiting mechanism through its practices, knowledge, ideas, meanings, of good governance values and the potentials it confers on it. Separating - society from these ideas entails creating alienation tion of water refers to a social order that decides on from the social nature of water and, therefore, the itsAccording meanings, to Linton, the uses (2010) of water,the hegemonic institutions, construc laws political subordination of the majority of the pop- and the authorities responsible for managing it, as ulation. In this respect, the power factor becomes well as the techniques and distribution of the ben- crucial to understanding the governance of water and the future of the institutions that exercise its how were we taught to produce the idea of water management. asefits an derived abstraction, from aits compound allocation. of In hydrogen his text, he and asks: ox- and encourage discussions that will answer the central point highlighted by the author points is questionThese related are the toarguments the water that - society allow uslink. to reflectThese thatygen one synthesized of the main in characteristics the chemical formula of modern H20? wa A- arguments lead to the second question we formu- lated, explained below. ter is its simplicity and its simplification. - 3. Also valid for islands, although the territorial dimension is re- ing anyLinton (inland) lists threewater mainand of characteristics being anywhere. of The the duced to municipalities and provinces or their equivalent. modern idea of water: its universality, the fact of be 24 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
How we achieve water quality with this diversity - gles for water access and control, and exclusion and er becomes central and therefore the conception access mechanisms are expressed in institutions, Atof the this hydrosocial point in the cycle reflection, of critical the aspectgeography of pow ex- through factors such as hydraulic works, legisla- pressed in the development of political ecology be- tion, institutions, practices and symbolic meanings comes extremely important. A central premise of
is that the circulation of water is both a social and cycle,(Larsimont not only and the Grosso, relationships 2014:8). activatedWhen we for speak its ac of- physicalpolitical ecology,process. asAccordingly, noted by Swyngedouw the idea of circula(2004),- cesswater but flows, also wethe referrelationships to the complete involved hydrosocialin the uses,
It is important to note that the natural resourc- tion invites us to understand how flows of water, esquality existing and in ways ecosystems in which are its finalthe sustenance disposal occurs. of life capital and power are materially linked (Larsimont and that water guarantees the services of ecosys- withinand Grosso, the physical 2014:7) environment (atmosphere, sur- tems, while man is the main user of the goods (and Thus, in addition to examining how water flows services) they provide. These interrelationships de- considers how water is manipulated, used and con- termine the inseparability between water, sustain- centratedface, subsoil, by biomass),social stakeholders, the “hydrosocial” how the cycle strug also- able socioeconomic development and life systems.
Figure 1. Sustainable Development Goals 2030 The essence of the Sustainable Development Goals until 2030 approved by the United Nations (December, 2015), is evidence of the transversality and social nature of water. None of these objectives can be met unless, “water availability and sustainable management and sanitation for all are guaranteed”. WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 25
Accordingly, it is necessary to become aware From the above, we can therefore derive what we initially recognized, namely that access to water that schematizes the occurrence of water in na- in quantity and quality for all sectors of society can turethat must from abe scientific perceived perspective, as a hydrosocial the water cycle, cycle giv- only be achieved by destroying the epistemic obsta- - cles imposed by the various disciplinary perspec- ior of each of the components of that cycle. In this tives and instead adopting an integrated, multidi- respect,en the significant becoming impact aware societyof the social has on construction the behav mensional approach, built on the reappropriation of water quality is a determining factor for creating of the knowledge and powers of the citizens with better institutional models that enable good water whom water governance is organized. governance.
A global look forward: United Nations References Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) until 2030 Water-related problems facing society require glob- Alcocer, D.J., E. Kato, E. Robles y G. Vilaclara (1988). ContaminaciónEstudio preliminar Ambiental del efecto del dragado sobre of their multiple aspects is the solution. el estado trófico del Lago Viejo de Chapultepec.- al answers:Actions problemsat the local are level global have and exceeded the integration the lim- 4 43–56. - its of ecosystems,4 and that level has created global Armienta,nic-bearing M.A.; rocks L.K. Ongley;in groundwater R. Rodríguez; pollution G. Vil at consequences. Accordingly, the change in society’s Zimapanlaseñor; H.Valley, Mangoy Mexico. (2002). Environmental The role ofGeology arse actions and attitudes towards these problems must be conceptualized and addressed at all levels, be- - ginning with the local level, but always with a view 42:433–438. towards the global level. Budds, J (2012). La demanda, evaluación y asig Figure 1 - nación del aguaRevista en Geografía el contexto Norte de escasez:Grande, No. un análisis del ciclo hidrosocial del valle del río La perspective ofattempts water and to outline its transversality how the 17 SDGswith relo- Ligua, Chile. - callate and to SDGglobal 6 concerningscales. water. It show the social 52: 167-184. Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA) (2011). Es Situacióntadísticas del subsectoragua en México. agua potable, México, alcantarilCONAGUA- According to Sandoval Minero (2017), this- Comisiónlado y saneamiento. Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA) (2013). forms,means organizationthat the effort and to achieve governance. SDGs In must this be respect, much - thegreater achievement in terms ofof financialthe water terms, target institutional entails the re- sessment of the potential México: for CONAGUA arsenic leaching duction of poverty, the improvement in food and Carrillo, A. and Drever, J. (1998). Environmental as- health of the population, regular school attendance ifornia Sur, México. Geofísica Internacional, by children, the reduction of domestic burdens that into groundwater from mine wastes in Baja Cal mainly affect women, labor productivity, the reduc- 37, tion of social inequality, the sustainability of cities, 35-39. as well as the care of marine and inland aquatic Carrillo-Rivera,action between J.J., groundwaterCardona, A., Huizar-Alvarez,and other compo R.,- - nentsGraniel-Castro, of the environment E. (2008). Response in Mexico. of the Environ inter- - mental Geology, ityecosystems access. (Sandoval Minero, 2017:129). Lastly, in - tegrated water management influences water qual 55, 303-319. Escolero, O.; S. Kralisch, S.E. Martínez, M. Perev 4. Human water management has not only jeopardized the abil- deochtchikova las fuentes (2016). de abastecimiento Diagnóstico de y análisisagua pota de- ity to create a sustainable water cycle, but also endangers water los factores que influyen en la vulnerabilidad for the different forms of life that also depend on it (Pacheco-Ve- ble a la Ciudad de México. Boletín de la Sociedad ga, 2017). Geológica Mexicana
, Vol. 68 N° 3 pp. 409‒427. 26 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Sistemas complejos.
García, R. (2006). Barcelona: Muradian R., B. Nath, A. Jafar and L. Doménech- Gedisa tion(2009). in Water The South and Sanitation Asian Experience: Services (WSS) Financial In- Global Water Partnership (2003). Tec Background- Arrangements for Facilitating Local Participa Text No.7, Peter Rogers and Alan W. Hall Water and Sanitation Hukka, J.J. & T. Katko (2009). ComplementaryWater and ParaSani- Services.terventions Public in Poor Policy Urban and Areas-Management. Lessons from- digmstation ofServices. Water andPublic Sanitation Policy and Services: Management. Lessons Bangladesh and Nepal. from the Finnish Expirience. What’s EarthWater - encan, Boletín UK. Earthcan, UK. Integrated Urban Wa- Peña, A. (2011). Introducción al libro Jiménez,ter Management B. (2009) Management in Arid and Semi-arid of Water inRegions Mex 74. México: El Colegio de Hidalgo. - aroundico City, the in World.Mays, L. (ed.) Pietiläperience. P., M. J. Water Gunnarsdóttir, and Sanitation P Hjorth Services. and S. Balslev Public Policy(2009). and Decentralized Management. Services: The Nordic Ex los nuevos conceptosParis: híbridos UNESCO. para abordar las Social power and the urban- Larsimont, R. y Grosso, V. (2014).Cardinalis Aproximación a ization of water: flows of Earthcan, power. UK. - Swyngedouw, E. (2004). problemáticas híbridas. , Revista del Oxford: OxfordAGUA. Córdoba,Departamento Argentina de Geografía, Año 2, No. 2, Facul AgendaUniversity ciudadana Press. de ciencia, tecnología e inno- tad de FilosofíaWhat y Humanidades, is Water? A history Universidad of a mod de- Torregrosa,vación. M.L. (Coordinadora) (2013). ern abstraction. - Linton, J. (2010). México: CONACYT, AMC, UNAM. University of Vancouver. Cana Torregrosa,Mexico. Water M.L & and B. Jiménez Sanitation (2009). Services. Faxcing Public the da: British Columbia Press. - PolicyUniversal and Management. Access of Water and Sanitation in Meerganzdouw al Von debate Medeazza, sobre G.los (2006) recursos Flujos hídricos de agua, en flujos de poder. La aportación de ErikDoc. Swynge Anal. Earthcan, UK. Geogr. Latinoamérica y en el Estado Español. 47: 127-139. WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 27
Water and Health
Martín Forde (Grenada), Ricardo Izurieta (Ecuador), Banu Ôrmeci (Canadá), Mercedes Arellano (Cuba) y Kerry Mitchell (Grenada)
Introduction
The link between water and human health is immutable. Water not only is essential for life,
ourbut healthmore immediately, and wellbeing. for good health and well-being. Given that over 60% of the human body is water, readily having it in sufficient quantities and quality is fundamental both for
cleanWhen water the and United sanitation Nations worldwide. launched The the philosophyfirst International that all Drinking-Waterpeoples, regardless Supply of their and socio-economicSanitation Decade status, (1981 have – 1990) a basic in 1977, right its to purpose drinking-water was to bring both attention in quantities and supportand quality for equal to their basic needs was recognized and adopted. In the sentinel conference held to
elucidate primary health care factors held in Almaty (formerly Alma-Ata), Kazakhstan, 1978,- the need for an adequate supply of safe water and basic sanitation was specified. - In 2000, the United Nations codified political commitments aimed at tackling major de velopment issues faced by the developing world within a fixed period of time into 8 Mil- lennium Development Goals (MDGs). While many of these MDGs can either be directly or indirectly linked to water supply and sanitation issues, Goal 7 on environmental sustain ability, and in particular Target 10, declared the goal that by 2015 to halve the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation. In 2015, the affordableUN launched drinking the Sustainable water Development Goals (SDGs), also known as Global Goals, which againThe declared continued, as one sustained of its goals focus (Goal on providing#6) that all safe humans drinking by 2030 water have to accessall was to reiterated safe and
water-basedby the UN Secretary-General plan are to make António a global Guterres call to action at the for launch water, of sanitation the International and hygiene¬¬–or Decade for WASH¬–andAction 2018-2028, to put in a New greater York, focus on World on water-related Water Day, March sustainable 22, 2018. development Prime goals goals of this and latest in- tegrated management of water resources over the next ten years.
be related to child mortality, maternal health, hunger, and several notable diseases such as The UN’s SDG Water Goal has both a direct and indirect impact on human health as it can-
infectiousmalaria, dengue diseases fever that and plague others. the The developing former United world Nationsuntil we Secretary-General have also won the Kofi battle A. An for safenan declareddrinking-water, that “we sanitation shall not andfinally basic defeat health AIDS, care.” tuberculosis, malaria, or any of the other
Martin Forde [email protected] Doctor en Ciencias, Universidad de San Jorge. Ricardo Izurieta [email protected] Depart- ment of Global Health, University of South Florida (USF); Colegio de Medicina, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Banu Ôrmeci [email protected] Profesora Titular y Cátedra Jarislowsky en Agua y Salud, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Ambiental de la Uni- versidad de Carleton, Ottawa ON, Canadá. Mercedes Arellano [email protected] Investigadora Auxiliar, Comisión del Agua (CA); Academia de Ciencias de Cuba (ACC); Agencia de Medio Ambiente, Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente (CITMA). Mitchell kmitche3@ sgu.edu Doctor en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de San Jorge. 28 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Around the world, millions are deprived on ade- ural processes and/or anthropological sources. quate drinking water supplies and/or are forced to consume potentially unsafe water which ultimate- that are used in manufacturing and commercial ly adversely impacts on their health and wellbeing. There are more than 100,000 registered chemicals The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates - - iesproducts of water. (Schwarzman As a result, several and Wilson, regulatory 2009), agencies many haveof which established ultimately limits find theiras to wayshow tomuch natural of these bod Further,that 1.1 billion as a consequence people lack of access having to to sufficient consume wa- contaminants can be in potable water (Table 1). ter suppliesof poor qualityand 2.6 billionand inadequate lack adequate quantity, sanitation. WHO Chemical contaminants can be categorized as reports that annually millions of deaths¬––especial- carcinogenic, genotoxic, and mutagenic based on ly among children––are associated with water-re- their effect on human health. Carcinogenic contam- lated diseases and infections (e.g. water-borne and inants cause cells to become cancerous and induce vector-borne). Additionally, inadequate and poor - water quality supplies also affect crops production nants cause changes to the structure of the genet- and can lead to food contamination when untreat- icthe material growth of of cells. cancerous Mutagenic cells. contaminants Genotoxic contami induce ed wastewater in used for irrigation, ultimately im- permanent and heritable changes to the genetic pacting on the nutritional status of populations. material, and carcinogenic and genotoxic chemi- The problems of poor drinking water quality cals are usually mutagenic as well. At low concen- are not limited to only developing countries but are tration levels, it might take an extended period of also experienced in several developed countries. time ranging from several years to several decades For example, although many developed countries after exposure to these toxic contaminants before have made substantial improvements in their drink- ing water treatment systems, emergent pathogens Acute health effects, which can be seen within a few have caused major water-borne outbreaks among days,the first can signs also of occur these ifchronic the chemical health effects contaminant appear. concentration levels are very high. States reported the largest document waterborne Naturally occurring contaminants are typically outbreakthe populations which theyhappened serve. Inin AprilMilwaukee 1993, the city, United Wis- released from geological formations and are typi- cally found in higher concentrations in groundwa- ter compared to surface waters. Natural chemical consin (Dore 2015). In a more recent review of the- contaminants are mainly inorganic in origin and water supply system in the U.S., an investigation of- - 680,000 water quality and monitoring violations re trates and nitrites, and radionuclides. Arsenic has arecorded exposed by the to Environmental potentially unsafe Protection water. Agency re beeninclude shown arsenic, to cause fluoride, skin, iron lung, and bladder, manganese, and liver ni vealed that as many as 63 million persons in the U.S. cancers, hyperkeratosis and peripheral vascular disease in humans, and is a major cause of concern Water contaminants and health in the Indian sub-continent, South America and
The water that humans consume needs to be clean - and free of both chemical and microbial contami- Far East (Fawell and Nieuwenhuijsen, 2003). High nants. The adverse health effects that can arise by concentrations of fluoride can lead to skeletal de drinking contaminated water range from acute formity and dental fluorosis and is also a cause of health effects such as acute gastrointestinal dis- significant morbidity in the Indian sub-continent, eases to long-term outcomes such as cancer and atAfrica, lower and concentrations Far East (Fawell cause and discoloration, Nieuwenhuijsen, taste physical and neurological developmental delays in and2003). turbidity Manganese issues. and Several iron, abundant epidemiological in many studsoils,- children. ies have linked manganese to adverse neurological effects after long exposures to high concentrations, Chemical contaminants however, this is currently debated as there are also Chemical contaminants can be found in water sup- - plies as a result of their introduction through nat- tween manganese in drinking water and neurolog- studies which showed no significant correlation be WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 29
- levels, emerging contaminants have been shown globinemia mainly in infants, commonly referred to have adverse impacts on aquatic life and human toical as effects blue baby(WHO, syndrome, 2017a). Nitrites where cause the nitrite methemo con- verts hemoglobin to methemoglobin and limits ox- Other sources of emerging contaminants in- ygen transport. Nitrate and nitrite have been linked cludehealth agricultural (Sumpter and activities Johnson, through 2005). the use of her- to esophagus, stomach, bladder and colon cancers bicides and pesticides, which are carried by surface runoff to water bodies. Mining activities and indus- radioactive isotopes in the environment, and their trial waste are the main sources of heavy metals (IARC, 2010). Radionuclides are naturally occurring (e.g., Cr, Ni, Cu, Pb, Hg) and their toxic health effects a decay product of radium, and among the radionu- - clides,presence it is varies the most from important location to one location. and is Radonsuspect is- ganic compounds, heavy metals do not go through biologicalon humans or have chemical been degradation,well-documented. and their Unlike toxici or- odorless, colorless gas that can enter the indoor liv- ty, bioavailability, and transport in the environment inged ofspaces causing from lung water cancer taps (EPA, and showering.2010). Radon Ninety is an are determined by the oxidation/reduction, precip- percent of the exposure to radon in drinking water itation and adsorption reactions. There are well-es- has been reported to be through inhalation and not tablished limits for the concentrations of heavy metals in drinking water (Table 1). Naturally occurring organic chemicals may also High concentrations of lead in drinking wa- threateningestion water (UNSCEAR, quality, 2000). although there are relatively ter due to leaching of lead from plumbing and wa- few of these contaminants compared to the natural- ter distributions systems remains a major public ly occurring inorganic chemical contaminants. The health issue around the world. In the recent water main naturally occurring organic contaminant in surface waters is microcystin, which is a toxin pro- duced by cyanobacteria and can pose a major threat concentrationslead contamination in their case drinking in Flint, water Michigan, with USA,at least in to the quality and safety of drinking and recreation- aApril quarter 2014, of consumers the houses experiencedsampled exceeding very high the leadfed- al waters during algal blooms. Algal blooms are - primarily driven by nitrogen and phosphorus pol- lution, and their frequency, intensity, and duration leaderal limitto a doublingof 15 ppb of and the some infants water and sampleschildren meawith have increased in recent years due to the increased elevatedsuring as blood high aslead 13,200 levels ppb (Hanna-Attisha (Lazarus, 2016). et This al., discharges of wastewaters into surface water bod- ies, as well as due to the effects of climate change. In Chemical disinfectants used during water treat- ment2015). processes can also lead to the formation of - chlorinated, iodinated, and nitrogenized disinfec- 2014, 400,000 people were without usable wateret al in., Toledo, Ohio, after an algal bloom in Lake Erie, gen contaminantserated high levels to water of toxins resources in water is (Benedictmuch worse in bladdertion byproducts cancer at (DBPs). concentrations Trihalomethanes lower than (THM), what developing2017). The threat countries from where naturally there occurring is limited organic to no haswhich been are establishedchlorinated inDBPs, regulations have been (Villanueva linked with et wastewater treatment. al Anthropological sources of water contaminants Current regulations are currently structured to include sewage and industrial wastewater dis- ., 2004). charges, agricultural activities, mining operations, based targets. This approach, however, is not very accidental spills and illegal dumps, as well as chem- realisticfocus on individualfor emerging chemicals contaminants and specific given health- that icals from water treatment and distribution sys- these tend to be present at very low concentrations tems. Domestic and industrial wastewaters are the in water and persons are exposed to not one but a main sources of emerging contaminants, such as mixture of these chemicals for very long periods of endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals, time. There are major knowledge gaps in assessing and personal care products, which exist in parts per the health impacts of chronic exposure to multiple trillion (ppt) to parts per billion (ppb) levels in sur- chemicals and understanding what interactions oc- - face waters. Even at these minute concentration cur (WHO, 2017b). At present, there is no agreed-up 30 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
on risk assessment and management methodology al -
Although., 2010), it with is expected Europe that reporting the occurrence 136 similar of outwa- assessmentfor chemical of mixtures. chemical The mixtures European based Commission on several ter-bornebreaks during viral the outbreak period should2000-2007 be more(ENHIS, frequent 2009). parameters(EU, 2012) has including recommended their chemical prioritizing characteris the risk- in middle and low-income countries, the absence tics, prevalence, adverse health effects at the typical of resources and the techniques to detect viral con- exposure levels, persistence and bioaccumulation taminants in water in these countries explains the potential, and threshold concentrations. The WHO apparent dearth of such reports. For centuries, Vibrio cholera has caused lethal epidemics with thousands of deaths all around the forGuidelines nitrate/nitrite for the Drinkingand THMs Water and Qualitystipulates (WHO, the world. Although great advances have been made in need2017a) to currently consider recommends the mixtures an ofadditive pesticides approach that the area of improving water sanitation, low and lim- have similar structures and modes of action, such ited resources in many countries, many times exac- as atrazine and simazine. Considering the very large number of chemical contaminants, the complexity of their chemistries erbated by ongoing conflicts means that many are still being killed by this pathogen (Izurieta, 2006). studying their effects on humans and environment, pathogenicThree of the bacteria. six Escherichia Other bacteria coli strains such (0127, as Salmo 0148,- theand needinteractions, for high-tech the difficulties but high-cost in measuring treatment sysand- nellaand 0157) spp., are Shigella of major spp., importance and Campylobacter as waterborne spp. tems for their removal, the most effective approach have also been the causal pathogen in many water- in managing chemical contaminants is to protect borne outbreaks. drinking water sources, minimize or eliminate all Of increasing concern is the emergence of sources of pollution and switch to less harmful new pathogenic bacteria which can be transmit- chemical substitutes when possible. ted through water. Helicobacter pylori, the neces- sary element in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer, Biological contaminants has been found in drinking water, as well as oth- Water and food are the two main routes of exposure er pathogens like Mycobacterium Avium Complex for various gastrointestinal microorganisms whose (MAC) and Aeromonas hydrophyla. Standard labo- reservoirs are humans, animals and/or the envi- ratory methods need to be updated in order to in- ronment. All segments of the human population are susceptible to water-borne pathogens, however, the methods to detect viable but non-cultivable bacte- very young, elderly and immunosuppressed suffer troduce alternative bio-molecular and fluorescence disproportionately the most severe consequences. The HIV/AIDS epidemic has brought to the fore Microbial water contaminants can be broken theria inpathogenicity water (Cabral, of 2010).parasites like Cryptosporidium - spp. among the immunosuppressed, the young and teria, Protozoa, Metazoan (helminths), and Algae the elderly. Toxigenic cyanobacteria have also been (downTable into 2). theVirus following can infect major all groups:living organisms Viruses, Bac in- associated with eutrophication and massive human cluding bacteria, plants, animals, and humans. The - most important viruses from a water contamina- creasing concern, even the long sought-after goal of - and animal intoxications (Tundisi,Dracunculus 1998). And media of in- nesis) by substantial improvements in improving tion perspective are as follows: Rotaviruses, Astro- theeradicating safety of the drinking Guinea water worm may ( be slipping away viruses.virus, Norovirus, These viruses Hepatitis are primarilyA, Hepatitis transmitted E, Coxsackie, by due to the emergence of canine reservoirs (Cairn- contaminatedEnterovirus, Polioviruses, water via the Adenoviruses, fecal-oral route. and Echo While most human viral infections are asymp- - tomatic or produce mild symptoms, moderate to cross, 2002). severe clinical cases can occur during outbreaks. of antibioticsMost recently, in food-producing the emergence animals of Antibiotic has led Rethe WHOsistant to Microorganism recommend that (ARM) farmers due toand the the heavy food use in- et dustry stop using antibiotics routinely to promote The United Sates reported 64 water-borne viral outbreaks during the period 1971-2006 (Craun WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 31
Table 1. Regulatory limits for chemicals in drinking water
et al., 2014.
Source: De Villanueva 32 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
growth and prevent disease in healthy animals stances which have been generated from different - - ments and technology transfer for water manage- tin(WHO, resistant 2017c). E coli Preliminary studies carried out in- mentprocess. in developing By and large, countries however, has not adequate occurred. invest The Ecuador have revealed a 71.2% prevalence of colis- high demographic growth experienced in most de- sistant E coli in fecesand of 65.9% chickens prevalence and pigs, of and extend that veloping countries has served to further exacerbate theseed-spectrum high prevalences beta-lactamases were (ESBL)associated producing with there this problem. In many developing countries, river use of antibiotics in pig and chicken feeding formu- and lakes which serve as the primary sources for drinking water are heavily polluted due to the wan- of the disposal of animal bio solids into water bod- ton and indiscriminate disposal of domestic and in- ies,las. these Given feces that are there being are discharged currently no in restrictionsstream, riv- dustrial wastes. These practices persist in part due ers and lakes. Therefore, it is plausible that highly to the lack of legal regulations and/or political un- - willingness to enforce laws and regulations that are already on the books. poorARMs health are already outcomes present when in consumed raw waters by humans. of Ecua dor (Izurieta and Yamamoto, 2018) which can led to pollution of key drinking water sources is usually In countries with limited financial resources the Influence of Economic Conditions along ditches built close to the houses, the unavail- associated with the drainage of gray water flowing on water quality and health ability of daily collection of solid wastes and the ef- fects of wastes lixiviates. These problems are caused Terrestrial waters can be considered as being part by the lack of sewerage systems, waste treatment of productive processes, generating costs that are internationally recognized water quality standards. of these processes. This is why water management stationsIt is welland waterknown purification and widely plantsdisseminated which meet that (protectionincluded in theincluded) financial is consideredbalance (income, in the economcharges)- in many tropical countries rainwater accumulates ic context. in soil depressions, vessels without covers or dis- The current economic dimensions of water carded tires, thus becoming larvae repositories for management had their origin at the end of past mosquitos such as the Aedes aegypti, the transmit- ter of the dengue disease. viewed water as just one component in several pro- Investments made to protect a population’s ductioncentury. processes. Basically, However, economists other have economists traditionally have - noted that water is fundamentally a different type resourcesdrinking water due to can the lead reduction to many of water-relatedsocial benefits dis in- - cluding a saving of scarce public sector´s financial allof resource.a factor of Aguilera-Klink social, economic (1995) and pointsenvironmental out that Domestic Product in the African continent as a con- “water is more than a production factor. It is over eases. According to the World Bank, losses in Gross-
cohesion.” Aguilera- Klink (2001) later stated that sequenceIt is thus of the recommended malaria (2003) that exceeded developing 12,000 coun mil- eco-social“water can resource.” be seen from different perspectives: trieslion dollars evaluate (Larbi possible Bouguerra, solutions 2007). and ways to sup- as aThe production economy element, has a direct as financialimpact on issue several and wa as- ply water with the required quality, despite the fact ter-related aspects, such as its quality, and therefor that the problems mentioned above are not solved on its uses. When water quality is low, water-relat- ed diseases and illness appears. solution in a short time. The political will of govern- - mentsand financial is important. limitations It is donecessary not allow to toquantify give them the sources and requisite technologies to mitigate the costs, to establish priorities to give access to this impactsMost of developed industrial development. countries have These financial countries re natural resource on the basis of social inclusion, also have developed the necessary legal instru- prioritizing the most vulnerable communities who ments and regulations which establish permissible limits for disposal of waste water and polluting sub- this way societies will be more likely attain human have to least material and financial resources. In WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 33
Table 2 Most important water-borne human pathogens Agent Disease Reservoir Humans, Animals Astrovirus Humans Rotaviruses Gastroenteritis Norovirus Humans Gastroenteritis and Acute Respiratory Infection Hepatitis A Hepatitis Humans Gastroenteritis Hepatitis Humans, Animals
Hepatitis E Coxsackie viruses and mouth disease, meningitis, cardiac infection, and peripheral Humans Viral Gastroenteritis, Upper Acuteneuropathy Respiratory Infection, hand, foot,
and mouth disease, cardiac infection, meningitis and peripheral Humans Gastroenteritis and Upper Acuteneuropathy Respiratory Infection, hand, foot, Enterovirus Polioviruses Poliomyelitis Humans Adenoviruses Humans
Gastroenteritis and Acute Respiratory Infection Humans hepatitis Gastroenteritis, Acute Respiratory Infection, meningitis, and CampylobacterEchoviruses spp. Humans, Animals Escherichia coli Humans, Animals Gastroenteritis Helicobacter pylori Humans Gastroenteritis Legionella spp. Pneumonia, gastroenteritis Aquatic Gastritis, Gastric cancer Leptospira spp. Mild fever with rash or Hemorrhagic fever Aquatic, Soil, Animals Salmonella spp. Humans, Animals Bacterial Shigella spp. Gastroenteritis Vibrio cholera Aquatic (estuaries) Gastroenteritis Yersinia enterocolítica Gastroenteritis with watery diarrhea Criptosporidium spp. Chronic diarrhea Humans, Animals Gastroenteritis Giardia duodenalis Abdominal pain Humans, Animals Protozoan Entamoeba Humans Dysentery, Hepatic abscess histolytica Balantidium coli Humans, Animals Schistosoma spp Humans, Aquatic Metazoan Dracunculus Humans, Animals, Intestinal,Painful papule Hepatic in the and skin, Urinary gastroenteritis infections medinensis Aquatic Algae Cianobacterias Intoxication Aquatic habitats that are inclusive, secure, resilient and sus- drinking water to meet daily needs can have seri- those living within a specific region. A lack of safe- tainable, in harmony with the United Nations SDG lion persons around on every continent at least one #11 by the year 2030. monthous health out consequences.of every year doesWorldwide, not have over adequate 2.8 bil Water scarcity and health safe drinking water to consume. The problem of in- adequate safe drinking water supplies is predicted to get worse over the foreseeable future due to pop- available water resources to meet the demands of ulation growth, increased demands especially from Water scarcity is the lack of sufficient, readily 34 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
the agricultural sector, and climate change. the population. This, in turn, severely limits the op- portunities and time women and children have to has both immediate and distal impacts on human engage in other socially productive activities such healthInsufficient and wellbeing. water suppliesIt is estimated to meet that daily humans needs as small business enterprises, localized garden require a minimum daily water intake that ranges farming, and schooling. - These estimates, however, increase in warmer cli- est user of freshwater resources. The additional mates,from 1.8 higher to 5 liters levels per ofcapita physical per day activity (Gleick and 1996). for demandsBy far, this the sectoragricultural will place sector on is watercurrently resourc larg- sensitive sub-population such as pregnant and lac- es is predicted to further increase with population tating women. Thus, the WHO recommends a mini- - - bandry and crop irrigation techniques, and anthro- quirements of most people under most conditions. pogenicallygrowth, the continueddriven climate use ofchanges. inefficient animal hus mum of 7.5 liters per capita per day to meet the re The International Water Management Institute hygiene. If persons are required to walk farther Sufficient water is essential for proper human for water collection, they then may not collect suf- they(IWMI) predict projects that thatunless nearly the issue 1 billion of water people scarci may- than 1 kilometer or spend more than 30 minutes tynot is have appropriately access to addresseswater by the today, year many 2025. countries Further, will soon face a series of impossible decisions when ficient water for proper hygiene (Gleick 1996). As a- choices have to made on how to reduce the amount ter-washed”result, some havediseases observed due to that inadequate many “waterborne” quantities of water used in agriculture that is demanding ofdiseases water being may beavailable more accuratelyfor necessary labeled human as activ “wa- more of it and transferring it to other competing ities such as washing hands, food preparation, laun- users in the industrial and domestic sectors. There is therefore an urgent need for meaningful invest- ments to be made today in water supply systems so dry, and washing cooking utensils (Bradley 1977). as to ensure adequate supplies of high quality wa- are children.Each year, Further, the WHO many estimates more suffer that debilitating about 2.2 ter is delivered to all, and this need must be clear- andmillion chronic persons health die problems. from diarrhea Diarrheal of which and 90%oth- ly articulated and acknowledged in all public health er diseases caused or worsened by water scarcity policies. have also been linked to other adverse health con- ditions such as malnutrition, decreased food intake, impaired nutrient absorption, and compromised Conclusions et al In addition to providing adequate supplies of water immuneParticularly systems in (Rice developing . 2000; countries, Stephenson as a result 1999; ofUN water 2003). scarcity, many are forced to drink poor increasing attention will need to be directed at en- quality water from untreated sources such are lo- suringas of 2017 that to the all 7.5quality billion of inhabitantsthis water is of high this enough planet, cal streams or rivers, which are contaminated ei- to guarantee human health and wellbeing. This ther chemically, microbial or both. Additionally, in- adequate water supplies mean that sewage does need to be allocated to not only building new wa- termeans treatment significant and distribution and consistent systems, resources but also will to- of health-related problems and can exacerbate the wards their maintenance and upkeep as they wear spreadnot easily of vector-borneflow, which then diseases creates such its ownas malaria. sequelae Water scarcity impacts human health in oth- Protection Agency estimates that local water sys- er ways. For example, fetching water from distant and age over time. In the U.S, their Environmental- sites, a task that is usually borne solely by women qualitytems will to needbe consumed. to invest USD 384 billion in the com on already malnourished women and children. Ad- ing decadesIt is well to established ensure that that the improving water is of a sufficient commu- and children, places additionally calorific burdens nity’s water supply, hygiene and sanitation leads to time and effort from these vulnerable segments of measurable improvements in health. For example, ditionally, this necessary task exacts significant WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 35
the WHO has found that the incidence of diarrhea with clean water. 507–528. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00077-09.Vol. 23, No.- can be reduced by 26% simply by providing persons 3. 0893-8512/10/$12.00doi:10.1128/CMR.00077- 09 http://aquaticpath.phhp.ufl.edu/waterbiolo- increasingIt is estimated anthropogenic that out polluting of the 35,000activities, Km³ only to mentgy/handouts2011/outbreaks-craun2010.pdf and Conservation, Springer Water, Spring - 50,000 Km³ fresh water globally available, due to- Doreer MH.International (2015). Global Publishing Drinking Switzerland, Water Manage DOI en that clean water is essential to good health, pro- abouttecting one-third this diminishing can be used and for threatened human needs. resource Giv will require concerted efforts by governments and 10.1007/978-3-319-11032-5_2Outbreaks of waterborne other policy makers who manage and oversee the Europeandiseases. Environment and Health Information use of this precious resource. System (ENHIS) (2009). Fact sheet no. 1.1, December 2009 z Code:- RPG1_WatSan_E1. http://www.euro.who.int/__- References data/assets/pdf_file/0009/96885/1.1.-Out breaks-of-waterborne-diseases-EDITED_layToxicity and assess- mentout_V03.pdf of chemical mixtures. económico, social y ambiental. El Campo European Union (EU) (2012). - Aguilera-Klink, F. (1995). El agua como activo Brussels: EU.http:// 132,- ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/en nas15–27. cuestiones ignoradas mucho antes del Nue- vironmental_risks/docs/scher_o_155.pdfWater In- Aguilera-Klink, F. (2001). Economía del agua: algu Gleick,ternational P. H. (1996). Basic water requirements for Año 1000, Año 2000. Dos milenios en la his- human activities: Meeting basic needs. toriavo Milenio. de España. En: Robot, L., Baldeón, J. y Villares, R. 21(2), 83–92. (2001). et al - Hanna-Attisha, Mona; LaChance, Jenny; Sadler, lance for WaterborneMadrid: Disease Nuevo Outbreaks Milenio. Asso- Richard Casey; Champney Schnepp, Allison Benedict KM, Reses H, Vigar M, . (2017). Surveil (2015). Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children- Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (MMWR) 2017; sponse.Associated American with the Journal Flint Drinking of Public Water Health. Crisis: ciated with Drinking Water - The United States, A Spatial Analysis of Risk and Public Health Re 2013–2014. A Death Foretold in the Times106 of 66:1216–1221. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/ Cholera(2): 283–290. (Presentation). Institute for the Study mmwr.mm6644a3 - Izurieta R. (2006). Bradley,ry, M. D.& Mara,(1977). D.D. Health eds.) aspects Wastes ofand water Health supplies in Hot of South Florida. Climates.in tropical countries. In: (Feachem, R.G., McGar of Latin America and the Caribbean, University- sults about the prevalence of colistin resistant Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.- Izurieta R & Yamamoto Y. (2018).E coli Preliminary in swine and re alpp. Pathogens 3–17. and Water. International Journal - Cabral,of Environmental JPS. (2010). WaterResearch Microbiology. and Public BacteriHealth. ument,and ESBL March. producing resistant poultry farming in Ecuador. Non-published doc - 2010;7(10):3657-3703. doi:10.3390/ijerph7103657. LarbiEl Bouguerra,agua y la salud, Mohamed (2007). Las batallas por Cairncross S, Muller R, ZagariaClinical N. (2002).Microbiolo Dra- el agua. Por un bien común de la humanidad. En: gycunculiasis Reviews. (Guinea Worm Disease) and the In Flint, Michigan,cap. 9, app. crisis 170 over y 172. lead Madrid: levels Eradication Initiative. inEditorial tap water. Popular. 2002;15(2):223-246. doi:10.1128/ Lazarus, O. CMR.15.2.223-246.2002.et al - ichigan-crisis-over-lead-levels-tap-water Public Radio International. https:// Craun GF, Brunkard JM, Yoder JS, Roberts VA, Roy www.pri.org/stories/2016-01-07/flint-m SL . (2010). CausesClinical of Microbiology Outbreaks Associat Reviews. ed with Drinking Water in the United States Mac Kenzie WR, Hoxie NJ,et al Proctor ME, Gradus MS,- from 1971 to 2006. Blair KA, Peterson DE, Kazmierczak JJ, Addiss American Society of Microbiology. July 2010, p. DG, Fox KR, Rose JB, . (1994). A massive out 36 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
break in Milwaukee of cryptosporidium infec- Goals. tion transmitted through the public water sup- ply. N Engl J Med. Villanueva, Human C.M., SettlementsCantor, K.P., Programme.Cordier, S., Jaakkola, London: - Earthscan. et al - nutrition as an underlying 1994 Jul 21;331(3):161-7. cause of childhood Ricedeaths AL, Sacro associated L, Hyder with A, infection Black RE diseases (2000). in Mal de- analysis.J.J., King, EpidemiologyW.D. Lynch, C.F. . (2004). Disinfec veloping countries. Bulletin of the World Health Villanueva,tion by productsC. M., Kogevinas, and bladder M., Cordier, cancer: S., a Temple pooled- Organization , 15:367-367.et al - exposure and health consequences of chemicals ence for chemicals 2000: policy.8: 1207-1221 Science ton, M. R., Vermuelen, R. . (2014). Assessing Schwarzman M.R. & Wilson, M.P. (2009). New sci- and research needs. Environmental Health Per- ure. Journal of Nutrition , 326:1065-66. inspectives, drinking water: Current state of knowledge Stephenson CB. Burden of infection on growth fail Chemi- 1999: 129(2S Suppl) cal mixtures 122 in (3), source 213-221. water and drinking water. 534S-538S. World Health Organization (WHO) (2017a). SumpterOther J.Issues P. & Johnson, Concerning A. C. Trace (2005). Organics Lessons in from the Endocrine Disruption andEnvironmental Their Application Science to& publications/chemical-mixtures-in-water/en/Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. ISBN 978-92-4- Technology, 151237-4. www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/WHO Aquatic Environment. guidelines on use of medically important anti- 39 (12), 4321-4332. Worldmicrobials Health in Organization food-producing (WHO) animals. (2017b). TundisiAmerica. J.G., Int. O. J. Rocha, Water T.Resour. Matsumura-Tundisi, Dev., B. Braga (1998). Reservoir management in South Geneva:- Water 14and (1998), Sanita pp.- WHO; 2017 http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/- tion141-155, in the 10.1080/07900629849367 World’s Cities: Local Action for Global handle/10665/258970/9789241550130-eng.pdf;j United Nations (UN) (2003). sessionid=BCED73094DF5752A2E3DB6BB672B 7F19?sequence=1 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 37
Biological Monitoring of Water Quality in the Americas
Ernesto González (Venezuela) and Gabriel Roldán (Colombia)
The determination of water quality is often based on the evaluation of its physical (tempera- ture, color, turbidity, transparency, total dissolved solids, suspended solids, color), chemical (conductivity, pH, alkalinity, acidity, hardness, dissolved oxygen, oxygen demand, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations, chlorides, heavy metals, biocides, among others) and mi- crobiological characteristics (presence of pathogenic bacteria, viruses, helminths and pro-
- tertozoa, quality among has other changed considerations) from a physical (WHO, and 2017). chemical Although approach these toparameters one integrating are accurate, all the they provide partial, specific information. Accordingly, in recent years, the concept of wa
studiedcomponents through of the the ecosystem use of biological, (Roldán hydromorphological & Ramírez, 2008). In and fact, physico-chemical the European Parliament indicators asFramework a measure Guideline of the quality COM-97 of aquatic has proposed ecosystems. establishing the ecological status of the system The physical and chemical parameters useful for the evaluation of water quality are de- termined by the presence of both organic and inorganic compounds, which may be in sus- pended or dissolved form. Some of these compounds are toxic to the ecosystem, while oth-
Aquatic ecosystems maintain an enormous diversity of organisms, as a result of which impactsers serve such as nutrients as pollution for organisms induce changes (Eletta in& Adekola,the structure 2005). of communities, the biological function of aquatic systems and the body itself, affecting their life cycle, growth and its re- et al - vide information on physical and chemical changes in water, since over time they reveal productive condition (Vázquez Silva ., 2006). For this reason, some organisms can pro functional system in which there is a cyclical exchange of matter and energy between living changes in the composition of the community (Laws, 1981). Thus, an aquatic ecosystem is a and play complementary roles in the evaluation of natural and polluted waters. organisms and the abiotic environment. Biology and chemistry are therefore closely related that there are groups of species whose presence in the ecosystem depends on the degree Levels of impact can vary from one aquatic ecosystem to another, and it has been found a very broad range of tolerance to the environmental conditions that occur in the habitat, dependingand type of largely impact on and the contaminants degree of contamination (Tabash, 1988). at Inthe each site. region, It is also some possible organisms to identify have
et al speciesdegradation that orare a thecombination first to disappear of these twodue factors,to the increase as a result in alterationsof which accurate caused knowledge by human activitiesmust be obtained (Vázquez of Silva the intolerant., 2006), species either found because in eachof the region. inadequate water quality, habitat For an organism to be considered a good indicator of water quality, it must be found in
an ecosystem with specific characteristics and its population must have a higher or slightly similar percentage to the rest of the organisms with which it shares the same habitat (Roldán
Ernesto José& Ramírez, González Rivas2008). [email protected] It has therefore been possible Universidad to identify Central de groups Venezuela of (UCV),Facultadorganisms thatde Ciencias, can be Instituto de Biología Experimental. Punto Nacional Focal del Programa de Aguas de IANAS. Roldán-Pérez [email protected] Miembro de Número y Director de Publicaciones, AcademiaColombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Medellín, Antioquia. 38 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
used as biological indicators of environmental im- - pacts that affect the water quality of different eco- al changes produced by eutrophication is the dom- systems, such as bacteria, periphyton, phytoplank- inancewater qualityof the main(Quirós, community 2004). Among of primary the structur pelagic ton, macrophytes, benthic macroinvertebrates and producers of lakes and reservoirs, phytoplankton, et al - by cyanobacteria. logical information produced by these bioindicator fishorganisms (Vázquez does Silva not replace., 2006). physicochemical Although the anal bio- and analysis of algae indicators provides a rapid as- ysis, it can lower costs, which is why these studies sessmentBellinger of trophic & Sigee status (2010) and state possible that the contamina detection- are important for monitoring water quality (Chap- tion by human activities of freshwater bodies. They therefore present what the indicator species of the In the countries on the American continent, trophic state would be in mid-summer in temperate thereman, 1996).are numerous experiences related to the use lakes (Table 1). of organisms to determine water quality, mainly The predominance of cyanobacteria in many in surface sources. This chapter seeks to provide a mesotrophic and eutrophic lakes and reservoirs modest overview of the experiences in the Ameri- - can continent in cases related to the proliferation lar nitrogen (in the form of dissolved gas). At that of certain groups of phytoplankton in lakes and res- time,can be nitrogen explained is usually by their the ability nutrient to limiting fix molecu pri- ervoirs according to their degree of eutrophication mary productivity and cyanobacteria would have and the use of macroinvertebrates as bioindicators competitive advantages in this situation (Pizzolón, of river water quality. lakes and reservoirs with high concentrations of nutrients1996). The can dominance also be explained of cyanobacteria by their inhigh these ca- Eutrophication and phytoplankton pacity to absorb dissolved carbon dioxide, even at very low concentrations. High pH values (basic) - also encourage the development of cyanobacteria, ents, mainly in phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N), due to their capacity to transform bicarbonate and producesExcessive changes enrichment in the with structure surface and water function nutri- carbonate ions into carbon dioxide. In fact, cyano- ing of aquatic ecosystems and the deterioration of bacteria are the only microalgae that develop im-
Table 1. Phytoplankton species indicative of trophic status in temperate lakes in mid-summer Type of lake Algae Indicators Diatoms: Cyclotella comensis, Rhizosolenia spp. Oligotrophic Green algae: Staurodesmus spp. Diatoms: Tabellaria flocculosa Chrysophites: Dynobrion divergens, Mallomonas caudata Mesotrophic Green algae: Sphaerocystis schroeteri, Dyctiosphaerium elegans, Cosmarium spp., Staurastrum spp. Dinoflagellates: Ceratium hirundinella Cyanobacteria: Gomphosphaeria spp. Diatoms: Aulacoseira spp., Stephanodiscus rotula Eutrophic Green algae: Eudorina spp., Pandorina morum, Volvox spp. Cyanobacteria: Anabaena spp., Aphanizomenon flos-aquae, Microcystis aeruginosa Diatoms: Stephanodiscus hantzschii Hipereutrophic Green algae: Scenedesmus spp., Ankistrodesmus spp., Pediastrum spp. Cyanobacteria: Aphanocapsa spp., Aphanothece spp., Synechococcus spp.
Source: Adapted from Bellinger & Sigee, 2010 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 39
Table 2. Algae distribution by trophic state in lakes in the western region of Canada Type of lake Algae Indicators Diatoms: Asterionella formosa, Melosira islandica, Tabellaria fenestrata, Tabellaria flocculosa, Oligotrophic Fragilaria capucina, Stephanodiscus niagarae, Staurastrum spp., Melosira granulata Chrysophites: Dynobrion divergens Diatoms: Fragilaria crotonensis Green algae: Pediastrum boryanum, Pediastrum duplex Mesotrophic Dinoflagellates: Ceratium hirundinella Cyanobacteria: Coelosphaerium naegelianum, Anabaena spp., Aphanizomenon flos-aquae, Microcystis aeruginosa Eutrophic Cyanobacteria: Microcystis flos-aquae
Source: Adapted from Rawson, 1956. portant biomasses in naturally alkaline and saline Macroinvertebrates as water environments. Another type of factor involved in its quality bioindicators predominance is the low consumption rate by zoo- plankton, either because they are unappetizing, or Aquatic macroinvertebrates are organisms that live because they mechanically interfere with the pro- at the bottom of rivers and lakes, attached to aquat- cess of their consumption, or because zooplankton stop feeding when there are toxic strains of cyano- bacteria in the environment. ic vegetation, trunks and submerged rocks (Roldán, are1988). called Their macroinvertebrates, populations are mainly since composedthey can be of - flatworms, insects, mollusks and crustaceans. They ers Accordingsuch as Thunmark, to Bellinger Nygaard & Sigee and (2010),Stockner in thede- - velopedmid-20th trophic century, status between indexes 1945 byand using 1972, largeresearch tax- seen with the naked eye and range in size from 0,5 onomic groups that were considered typical of qualitymm to approximatelyof aquatic ecosystems, 5,0 mm. Since evaluation the composi meth- oligotrophic (particularly desmids, a group of green odstion ofbased macroinvertebrate on these organisms communities have been reflects widely the algae) or eutrophic conditions (chlorococcal, cy- used for several decades as an integral part of wa- anobacterial, euglenoid). Although these indices provide useful information, they tend to lack en- American countries have been the leaders in this vironmental resolution, since many kinds of algae ter quality monitoring. European Union and Northet prove to be heterogeneous, containing typical lake al species, both oligotrophic and eutrophic. The im- permittedfield (Gaufin an &awareness Tarzwell, of1952; the Hynes, ecological 1959; status Resh of provement of sampling methods and the increase in their., 1995). rivers Studies and lakes, based which on this have methodology served as the have ba- taxonomic resolution enabled the development of sis for developing plans for their unexpected recov- indices based on indicator species separated from taxonomic groups. In the Americas, there have been experiences in ofery each in the country, past 20 this years. evaluation can be undertaken the use of phytoplankton groups and species for the withBased various on levels the knowledge of accuracy. of Thus, the aquatic for example, fauna determination of the trophic status and quality of - a list of dominant trophic status indicators for lakes edGermany, the Saprobic which method, has had which a longer requires tradition the iniden the- insurface the western waters. region, In Canada, shown Rawson in Table (1956) 2. Thispublished list is knowledge of its aquatic flora and fauna, has adopt
Other examples of studies of eutrophication and tification of organisms up to the species level for dominancebased on 25 ofyears phytoplankton of observations. groups in the Ameri- Netherlandsits application. and Other Ireland, countries, have adopted such as evaluation Belgium, cas are shown in Table 3. systemsFrance, Great based Britain, on the level Italy, of Portugal, orders, families Denmark, and the in 40 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Table 3. Examples of eutrophization and dominance of phytoplankton groups in the Americas Country Eutrophication and phytoplankton References
Pardo et al. Alcocer &et Lugo al. (1995), Díaz- Mexico particularly Anabaena spp., Microcystis aeruginosa, Oscillatoria et al. (1998), Quiroz Replacementspp. and Lyngbya of green spp. inalgae various and diatomseutrophicated by cyanobacteria, lakes. etCastelán al. (2004), Bravo-et al. (2010),Inclán entre (2008), otros. Oliva Martínez (2008), López-López conditions. Guatemala Prevalence of cyanobacteria in Lake Amatitlán due to eutrophic Lyngbya Basterrechea (1987) et al. (2010) of the change in land use and increase in nutrient concentration. Blooms of the species complex on Lake Atitlán, as a result Rejmánková Jones et al. et al. Costa Rica phytoplankton community dominated by green algae, some The mesotrophic Arenal Reservoir contains a varied diatoms and the Microcystis spp. cyanobacterium. (1993), Umaña (1999) Colombia Tominé) have a predominance of cyanobacteria, especially of the generaReservoirs Anabaena with more spp. signsand Oscillatoria of eutrophication spp. (El Peñol, Prado and Roldán (2002) Positive responses (increase) in the cyanobacterial families Bolivia Oscillatoriaceae and Nostocaceae to enrichment with nutrients and Fontúrbel & Castaño-Piña (2011)
Microcystis spp. and Anabaena spp. cyanobacteria blooms in the pH increase in Lake Titicaca. reservoirs in the State of São Paulo, with severe eutrophication due to industrial and agricultural waste. Tundisi (1988) Brazil Predominance of toxic cyanobacteria, particularly the Planktothrix agardhii (drought period) and Microcystis aeruginosa (rainy Chellappa et al. (2001)
period) species in the Armando Ribeiro Gonçalves reservoir (Rio Phosphorus is the main determinant of phytoplankton biomass Grande do Norte). et al. Argentina in more than 100 Argentine reservoirs, and the increase in the frequency of cyanobacterial blooms in eutrophic lakes. Quirós (1991, 2000), Quirós The rise in nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations has led to (2006) an increase in phytoplankton biomass and the dominance of et al. (2003), Chile cyanobacteria, generally with Anabaena spp., Microcystis spp. and CamposMühlhauser et al. & Vila (1987), Parra Oscillatoria spp. blooms. Almanza-Marroquín(1989), Parra et al. (2005, 2007), The process of eutrophication in large reservoirs (Salto (2016) & Chalar (2003), Chalar et al. growth of phytoplankton, with a predominance of diatoms and Chalar & Conde (2000), De León Grande, Bonete, Baygorria and Palmar) has led to an intense Uruguay cyanobacteria. Predominance of cyanobacteria throughout the year and a marked (2002), Chalar (2006, 2009) increase in the frequency and duration of microalgae blooms, particularly of Microcystis aeruginosa RAP-AL (2010) in the Laguna del Sauce. Reservoirs can be divided into three groups. Group 1: reservoirs with low concentrations of P (<20μg/L) and dominated by Venezuela ammoniumgreen algae. ratio,Groups with 2 and high 3: residence reservoirs times with ofmoderate its waters to andhigh aconcentrations predominance of of P cyanobacteria, (>20μg/L). In groupwhereas 2 there in group is a low3, there nitrate/ is a higher nitrate/ammonium ratio, short residence times of González & Quirós (2011) its waters and phytoplankton is dominated by taxa other than cyanobacteria. WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 41
some cases genera. Its effectiveness has been prov- The saprobic approach. The term saprobic, used - to refer to the capacity of certain organisms to sessment,” in addition to the fact that it provides a live in certain levels of pollution, was coined in considerableen in a high percentagereduction in for costs “Rapid and time Ecosystem (De Pauw as - saprobicGermany zone, by Kolkwitz with predominantly & Marsson (1908, reductive 1909). & Hawkes, 1993; Roldán, 2003). processes,They defined b) threemesosaphobic levels of saprobity:zone, partially a) poly re- Current state of knowledge of aquatic ductive with predominantly oxidative processes macroinvertebrates in the Americas and c) oligosaphobic zone, with exclusively oxi- dative processes. The use of aquatic organisms as bioindicators of the The diversity approach. This includes three main quality of aquatic ecosystems began in the Amer- uniformity and abundance, to describe the com- developed biological methods to evaluate the eco- munity’scomponents response of natural to environmental communities: quality. richness, A logicalicas in conditions the mid-20th of century.currents Patrickin North (1949, America, 1950) natural community is characterized by having - a great diversity of species and a low number of individuals per species, or a low number of while Gaufin & Tarzwell (1952) proposed macroin- species and many individuals per species. This vertebrates as pollution indicators and Hynes (1959,et situation is observed in nature in places such as al1963) proposed macroinvertebrates as water quali the depths of large lakes and the sea, very high methods,ty indicators. using In Marylandmacroinvertebrates (United States), as bioindica Resh - mountains and extreme temperatures. Water tors,. (1995) assessing developed habitat rapid conditions water quality and assessment predicting pollution produces a similar situation, causing the expected fauna at a given site. certain very sensitive communities to disap- Table 4 shows examples of the use of bioindi- pear and other more resistant communities to increase in number. in Colombia. The biotic approach. This approach includes cation in Latin America, based on pioneering work the essential aspects of saprobity, combining a quantitative measure of species diversity with Use of aquatic macroinvertebrates qualitative information on the ecological sensi- as water quality indicators tivity of taxa of individuals in a simple numeri- Aquatic macroinvertebrates are regarded as the - best water quality indicators because they are tweencal expression. pollution Beck intolerant (1955) and proposed tolerant the species; biotic abundant, widely distributed and easy to collect. index in the United States based on the ratio be conditions of their habitat. They are relatively easy values range between 0 and 10. They are mostly sedentary and therefore reflect the- The BMWP method mental variations, provide information to integrate cumulativeto identify, reflect effects, the have effects long of short-termlife cycles environ (weeks and/or months), can be recognized at a glance and - be cultivated in the laboratory, respond quickly to pleThe method Biological to assessMonitoring water Working quality usingParty macroin(BMWP)- environmental stressors and vary very little genet- vertebrateswas established as bioindicators. in England in The1970 reasons as a quick, for simthis - were mainly economic, and linked to the time tak- tebrate communities display different responses to en to undertake the assessment. The method only ically (Roldán, 1999, 2003). Moreover, macroinver- requires reaching the family level and the data is es three main approaches to assess the response of qualitative (presence or absence). The score rang- macroinvertebratepollution. Accordingly, communities Metcalf (1989) to pollution. distinguish These - ferent groups to organic contamination. The most es from 1 to 10 according to the tolerance of the dif include: the saprobic, diversity and biotic method. 42 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Table 4. Examples of work on aquatic macroinvertebrates and bioindication in Latin America Country Works on aquatic macroinvertebrates and bioindication References
et al. Start of bioindication in Latin America. The first works were Roldán (1973); Pérez & based on codes developed by researchers from the USA and Colombia Publication of the Guide for the Study of Aquatic Roldán (1978) Europe. Macroinvertebrates of the Department of Antioquia, which served as the basis for the beginning of knowledge on Roldán (1988) Publication of the book Diversity, conservation and use of macroinvertebrate communities in Latin America. Central America freshwater macroinvertebrates of Mexico, Central America, Alonso et al. (2014) Colombia, Cuba and Puerto Rico. Publication of a complete series of works on El Salvador Sermeño Chicas et al. (2010) macroinvertebrates. Costa Rica Springer et al. (2010) Publication of guide to macroinvertebrates as biological water Publication of the first macroinvertebrates code Nicaragua Salvatierra (2012) tributaries. quality indicators in the Gil González River and the main Guatemala Publication of status of aquatic macroinvertebrates
Honduras Reyes (2013) macroinvertebrates Publication of code for the identification of freshwater García & Jiménez (2006) Dominican Republic Presentation of report on the final sampling of Proposal of protocol for the ecological quality of the Andean Pérez (2015) Ecuador macroinvertebrates from the Ebano Verde region. Acosta et al.
Publication of studies on macroinvertebrates in Cajamarca (2009) Peru rivers (CERA) and its use in two basins in Ecuador and Peru. Paredes et al. (2004) and the Amazon. Characterization of ecosystem services of wetlands, taking Paraguay et al. (2012) aquatic macroinvertebrates into account. Publication of a guide entitled Diagnosis of pollution in surface Espinosa Panama Cornejo et al. (2017) streams of Panama using freshwater macroinvertebrates.
Puerto Rico et al. (2013) Use of methodology to evaluate water quality using the Publication of book on benthic macroinvertebrates of South Gutiérrez-Fonseca BMWP-Cub. America. Argentina Publication of macroinvertebrate guidelines as water quality Domínguez & Fernández (2009) indicators. Rocha (2004) Several experiences in the use of macroinvertebrates to Venezuela determine water quality and draw up indexes of the biotic SegniniRincón (1995),et al. Rivera & integrity of rivers in various regions of the country. Marrero (1995), Segnini (2003),et al. (2009), Echevarría & Marrero (2012), Barrios Publication of technical guide for the evaluation of waterbody Bolivia Valencia(2015), entre (2014) otros conditions using aquatic macroinvertebrates.
Brazil Publication of a book on the ecology of aquatic insects.
Chile NessimianCarvacho (2012) y Carvalho (1998) Publication of study on aquatic macro-vertebrates in riparian Uruguay Study of the aquatic macroinvertebrates of the Limari basin. Morelli & Verdi (2014) vegetation. WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 43
sensitive families such as Perlidae and Oligoneu- On the basis of the knowledge that currently exists in Colombia about the different groups of macroin- - vertebrates up to the family level, he proposes to riidae receive a score of 10. On the etother al hand, the summost of pollution-tolerant the scores of all ones,families for providesexample, theTubifici total dae, receive a score of 1.0 (Armitage ., 1983). The presentsuse the BMWP/Col the families method, and their as assessmenta first approach accord to- ingevaluating to their mountaindegree of adaptation aquatic ecosystems. to the various Table wa 5- BMWP score. et al., Bioindication in Colombia dates back to the 1970s with publications in Medellín (Roldán onter thequalities. basis of Each their region, experiences in both (Zamora Colombia & Sarria,and in undertook1973) constituting a physicochemical the first experiences and biological in study Latin Latin America, has made its own score assessments ofAmerica. the same Subsequently, river, using macroinvertebratesMatthias & Moreno as (1983) wa- et al 2001, Sánchez-Herrera, 2005, Zúñiga, 2009, Springer - the taxonomy,., 2010). ecology and bioindication of water nah.ter quality Zúñiga indicators.et al Bohórquez & Acuña (1984) qualityThe is information not the same available in all groups in Latin of macroinverAmerica on- undertook the first studies for the Bogotá savan - . (1993)et al adapted this method for eroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera than the oth- some of the basins in Valle del Cauca. Reinoso- ertebrates. taxa. It More is also information important isto availableexpand the on studyEphem of (1999) and Reinoso . (2008) conducted a study- annelids, mollusks and diptera, especially of the sessof the the Combeima quality of River epicontinental in the Department waters in ofColom Toli- Chironomidae family. It is necessary to advance ma. Zamora (2000) adapted the BMWP index to as the association of immature states and their corre- - sponding winged forms, as well as between males bia. Roldánet al (2001) used this methodology for the and females, in order to achieve a rigorous taxo- Piedras Blancas basin in the Department of Antio quia. Riss . (2002) establish biondication values- - forbia thethrough Bogotá the Savannah. use of aquatic Roldán macroinvertebrates. (2003) adapted the temsnomic and determination. large rivers. It is important to define a BMWP system to evaluate water quality in Colom unified methodology for the study of lentic ecosys
Table 5. Scores of aquatic macroinvertebrate families for the BMWP/Col index Families Scores
10 Anomalopsychidae, Atriplectididae, Blepharoceridae, Calamoceratidae, Ptilodactylidae, Chordodidae, Gomphidae, Hidridae, Lampyridae, Lymnessiidae, Odontoceridae, Oligoneuriidae, Perlidae, Polythoridae, Psephenidae. Philopotamidae, Polycentropodidae, Xiphocentronidae. Ampullariidae, Dytiscidae, Ephemeridae, Euthyplociidae, Gyrinidae, Hydrobiosidae, Leptophlebiidae, 9 Pseudothelpusidae, Saldidae, Simuliidae, Veliidae. Gerridae, Hebridae, Helicopsychidae, Hydrobiidae, Leptoceridae, Lestidae, Palaemonidae, Pleidae, 8 7 Baetidae, Caenidae, Calopterygidae, Coenagrionidae, Corixidae, Dixidae, Dryopidae, Glossosomatidae, Hyalellidae, Hydroptilidae, Hydropsychidae, Leptohyphidae, Naucoridae, Notonectidae, Planariidae, Psychodidae, Scirtidae. Staphylinidae. Aeshnidae, Ancylidae, Corydalidae, Elmidae, Libellulidae, Limnichidae, Lutrochidae, Megapodagrionidae, Sialidae, 6 Thiaridae. Belostomatidae, Gelastocoridae, Hydropsychidae, Mesoveliidae, Nepidae, Planorbiidae, Pyralidae, Tabanidae, 5 4 Hydrometridae, Noteridae. Chrysomelidae, Stratiomyidae, Haliplidae, Empididae, Dolicopodidae, Sphaeridae, Lymnaeidae, Hydraenidae, 3 Culicidae, Chironomidae, Muscidae, Sciomyzidae. 2 Ceratopogonidae, Glossiphoniidae, Cyclobdellidae, Hydrophilidae, Physidae, Tipulidae. 1
Tubificidae Source: Roldán, 2003. 44 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Immature forms of the entomofauna have a One of the problems in the use of bioindication good potential as bioindicators, as well as being to measure water quality is the indiscriminate use of a diverse, abundant community with a broad alti- biotic indices, in both lysic and lentic water ecosys- tudinal distribution in water ecosystems. For ex- tems. These ecosystems have different hydrological ample, in Colombia, the genus Anacroneuria (Ple- and ecological characteristics and a biota adapted to the particular conditions of each of these environ- greatest sensitivity to habitat degradation and the coptera: Perlidae), was one of the groups with the although there are some adaptations of this biologi- calments. parameter The BMWP at the index regional is extremely level, to ensure popular the and, va- enrichment of the residualLachlania organic load(Ologineurii (Roldán,- lidity of its application, it is important to take into dae),2003, Zúñiga,Haplohyphes 2010). The most sensitiveMayobaetis genera of, account the type of water bodies where it is used AndesiopsEphemeroptera includeAtopophlebia and Thraulodes (Zúñiga et al (Leptohyphidae),Camelobaetidius , Baetodes (Baetidae)Leptohyphes and Tricorythodes - Final considerations., 1993; Zamora, 2000, Roldán, 2003). (Leptobhlebiidae),hyphidae) have a whilelarge environmental spectrum (Baetidae), et al (Lepto Determining water quality can easily integrate tra- - ditional biochemical indicators, the information (Zamora,era of the 1996,order ZúñigaTrichoptera .,are 1997, Triplectides Roldán, 2003,- corresponding to the biotic components of ecosys- toceridae),Zúñiga & Cardona, Rhyacopsyche 2009). (Hydroptiliidae), The most sensitive Chimara gen tems, which provides a more holistic vision of the (Philopotamidae), Marilia (Odontoceridae) (Lepand response to the impacts on them. Phylloicus (Calamoceratidae). The genera Leptone- As has been seen, in the case of eutrophication, ma (Hydropsychidae) and Atanatolica - as in numerous studies on the temperate zones, in dae) have a broad scope, with adaptations to eco- the Americas it has also been recorded that the in- systems with incipient degradation (Zúñiga (Leptoceri et al., crease in nutrient concentrations, mainly of phos- et al phorus, leads to greater biomass of phytoplankton et al 1993, Zamora, et1996, al Ballesteros ., 1997, Roldán, most cases, the dominant cyanobacterial species 2003, Guevaraet al . , 2007a, b, Zúñiga & Cardona correspondand a predominance to the genera of cyanobacteria.Microcystis spp., Likewise, Anabaena in 2009, Forero ., 2013, Forero & Reinoso, 2013, spp. and Planktothrix spp., with the risk that many of Vásquez ., 2013, 2014). their species have toxic strains, which turn them into Standardization of work protocols potential health risks, particularly if the waterbodies are used to supply water for human consumption. In the case of the use of aquatic macroinver- standardization of sampling protocols, with an em- tebrates for bioindication, information on the tax- phasisIn Latin on America, large rivers it isand necessary lentic water to workbodies, on such the onomy and ecology of some of the entomological as wetlands or large lakes. This homogenization of groups with the greatest diversity, abundance and - biomass remains limited. This situation applies to tory analysis and the use of indices is essential to the Diptera, Odonata and Hemiptera orders, taxa achievingfield work consistent, protocols, comparable counting organisms, results and labora data which could provide valuable information from the et al - point of view of bioindication, especially for lentic environments, where their abundance and diversi- bases (Roldán ., 2016). In this respect, in Colom ty is usually greater than that which occurs in the generalbia, Rueda-Delgado information (2002) on the published various study the Manual methods of ecosystems of running water. On the other hand, forMethods the most in Limnology, important inbiota which in aquatic he compiled environ the- molluscs and annelids, whose abundance and bio- ments. The Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and mass are very high in contaminated environments - and enriched with organic matter, lack more de- rently developing a methodology for evaluating wa- tailed taxonomic information, leading to general- terEnvironmental quality for Colombia Studies of through Colombia the (IDEAM) use of aquatic is cur izations and misinterpretations about their poten- macroinvertebrates as bioindicators. tial as water quality bioindicators. WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 45
References
Inventario de las Propuesta de un protocolo de la calidad ecológi- morfofamilias de las clases Gasterópoda y Clitela- Acosta, R.; Ríos, B.; Rieradevall, M. y Prat, N. (2009). Bohórquez,ta como bioindicadoresA. y Acuña, A. limnológicos(1984). de la laguna Limnetica de La Herrera. Memorias XIX Congreso Nacional ca de los ríos andinos (CERA) y su aplicación a - dos cuencas del Ecuador y Perú. , 28 - (1): 35-64. Lake- y III Grancolombiano de Ciencias Biológicas. Bu Alcocer,line D.J. & Lugo, A. (1995). The urban lakes of caramanga: Universidad Industrial de Santand- Mexico City (Lago Viejo de Chapultepec). er, 70 pp. - , 15(2): 14–31. Bravo-Inclán,cation diagnosis L.A.; of Saldaña-Fabela, a high altitude M.P.body & of Sánwa- Almanza-Marroquín, V.; Figueroa, R.; Parra, O.; chez-Chávez, J.J. (2008). Long-termWater eutrophiScience & lagosFernández, urbanos X.; de Baeza, Concepción, C.; Yáñez, Chile. J. y Urrutia,Lat. Am. R.J. Technology, Aquat.(2016). Res.Bases limnológicas para la gestión de los ter, Zimapan Reservoir, Mexico. - 57(11): 1843-1849. - , 44(2): 313-326.Diversidad, conservación y Campos,tenciales V.; Lisperguer,de toxicidad S.; en Weckesser, aguas continentales J.; Vera, A. de y Alonso-Eguíalis,uso de los macroinvertebrados P.; Mora, J.M. Campbel. dulceacuícolas B y Spring de Chile.Muñoz, Boletín D. (2005). Micológico, Cianobacterias y riesgos po México,er, M. (Eds.) Centroamérica, (2014). Colombia, Cuba y Puerto Rico 20: 73-81. - Campos,cos de V.; cianobacterias Muñoz, D.; Straube, en cuerpos M.; Lisperguer, de agua dulce S. y performance. México: IMTA.of a new biological water quality Weckesser, J. (2007). PéptidosBoletín tóxicos Micológico, y no tóxi Armitage,score system P.D.; Moss, based D. on & macroinvertebrates Furse, M.T. (1983). over The a wide range of unpollute running-water sites. de La V Región, Chile.Estudio de las comunidades 22: Water Res de95-100. maroinvertebrados bentónicos y desarrollo Carvacho,de un índice C. (2012). multimétrico para evaluar el esta- ., 17: 33-347. do ecológico de los ríos de la cuenca del Limari, Barrios, M.C.; Rodríguez-Olarte, D.; García Silva, E. Chile. - (2015). Índice de integridad de los ecosistemas Maracaibo,fluviales con Venezuela. base a las Entomotrópicacomunidades de insectos Tesis de maestría. Universidad de Barcelo acuáticos en el río Misoa de la cuenca del lago de na. Barcelona 70 pp. Estudios recientes, 30: 69-83. so- Chalar, G. (2006). Dinámica de la eutrofización a- Basterrechea,bre la contaminación M. (1987). Enfoquedel Lago deglobal Amatitlán. del lago Ciu de- diferentes escalas temporales: Embalse Salto Amatitlán y su cuenca. En: (eds.).Grande Eutrofização (Argentina-Uruguay). na América En: do Sul: J.G. Causas, Tundi conseqüênciassi, T. Matsumura-Tundisi e tecnologias & Corina de gerenciamento Sidagis Galli dad de Guatemala: Centro Agronómico Tropical e controle. de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE), 9-31 - Ballesteros,Trichoptera Y.V.; in Zúñiga, various M.drainages del C. &of Rojas, the Cauca A.M. Instituto Internacional de Ecologia,- (1997). Distribution and structure of the order cias,Instituto Conselho Internacional Nacional de deEcologia Desenvolvimento e Gerencia mento Ambiental, Academia Brasileira de Ciên (eds.).River basin,Proceedings Colombia, of the and 8th theirInternational relationships Sym- International Issues, InterAmerican Network of posiumto water on quality. Trichoptera, En: R.W. 1995. Holzenthal, Columbus, & O. Ohio,Flint Científico e Tecnológico, InterAcademy Panel on
ofAcademies diversity offor Sciences. algal bloom São management. Carlos: 87-101. Limno- biotaUSA: Ohiodata. BiologicalSewage Ind. Survey, Wastes, 19-23. Chalar,logica G. (2009). The use of phytoplankton patterns Beck, W. M. (1955). Suggested methodFreshwater for reporting algae. - Identification and use as bioindicators. 27: 1193-1197. Chiches- , 39: 200-208. Bellinger, E.G. & Sigee, D.C. (2010). Chalar, G. y Conde, D. (2000). Antecedentes y es tado actual del conocimiento científico de los ter: Wiley-Blackwell. 271 pp. embalses del Uruguay. En: A. Fernández-Cirelli 46 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
(ed.). El Agua en Iberoamérica: Acuíferos, lagos y Mac- embalses. Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrol- roinvertebrados bentónicos sudamericanos: - Domínguez,Sistemática E. y biología.Fernández, H. (Eds.) (2009).
lo (CYTED). Subprograma XVII. Aprovechamien San Miguel de Tucumán, to de Recursos Hídricos. Buenos Aires: 145-147. - Argentina: Fundación Miguel Lillo. 656 pp. Chalar,vos G.;aportes De León, al conocimiento L.; Brugnoli, de E.; la Clemente, estructu J.- Echevarría,Portuguesa, G. y Venezuela,Marrero, C. utilizando (2012). Determinación macroinver- y Paradiso, M. (2002). Antecedentes y nue tebradosdel estado bentónicos ecológico delcomo río indicadores. Guanare, estado Acta Biol. Venez. Elra aguay dinámica en Iberoamérica. del embalse De Salto la Limnología Grande. En: a A.la GestiónFernández-Cirelli en Sudamérica. y G. Chalar-MarquisáPrograma Iberoameri (Eds.).- , 32(1): 29-55. cano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrol- Eletta,water, O.A.A. Kwara & Adekola, State, Nigeria. F.A. (2005). Science Studies Focus, of the physical and chemical properties of Asa River - 10(1): disciplinarioslo, CYTED XVII. del Aprovechamiento Agua; Facultad yde Gestión Ciencias de 72-76. - Recursos Hídricos; Centro de Estudios Trans Espinoza, A.; Villalba-Forcadell, C.V. e Ibarra, J.E. agua(2012). en Caracterización el humedal del riode serviciossalado, Paraguay. ecosistémi Bo- Veterinarias de la WaterUniversidad quality de assessments: Buenos Aires. A letíncos de de humedales: la Red Iberoamericana regulación de y del la calidad Caribe de Buenosguide to Aires: the use 123-141. of biota, sediments and water in Restauración Ecológica, Chapman,environmental D. (1996). monitoring. - ships between nutrient enrichment6(1): 3-4. and the phy- London: Chapman Fontúrbel,toplankton F.E. &community Castaño-Villa, at an G.J. Andean (2011). Relationoligotro- Hill. 626 pp. Ecología Chellappa, N.T.; Camara, F.R.A. & Rocha, O. (2009).- Aplicada, Phytoplankton community: indicator of water phic lake: a multivariate assessment. qualityBrazilian in the Armando Journal of Ribeiro Biology, Gonçalves Res 10(2): 75-81. ervoir and Pataxó Channel, Rio Grande do Norte, Forero,(Tolima-Colombia) C.A.M.; Gutiérrez, a través C. y Reinoso,de la fauna F.G. de (2013). mac- Brazil. 69(2): 241-251.- Evaluación de la calidad del agua del río Opia- Cornejo,to, C.; Tuñón, A.; López-López, A.; Molinar, E.;M.; Ábrego, Ruiz-Picos, T.; Pérez, R.A.; químicos. Rev. Caldasia, Sedeño Díaz, J.E.; Armitage, B.; Arefina, T.; Nie roinvertebrados acuáticos y parámetros fisico 35(2): 371-387. E.; Tuñón Rivas,Diagnóstico A.R.; Magué, de la CondiciónJ.; Rodríguez, Ambien A.L.;- Forero, C.A.M y Reinoso, F.G. (2013). Estudio de la talPineda, de los J.E.; Afluentes Cubilla Higuera,Superficiales J.J. y deÁvila Panamá. Quintero, In- familia Baetidae (Ephemeroptera:Rev. Insecta) Asoc. Col. en I.M. (2017). unaCienc. cuenca con influencia de la urbanización y agricultura: río Alvarado- Tolima. stituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la- ribereño (Col.), y de 25: las 12-21. actividades antrópicas en las Salud. Panamá: Ministerio de Ambiente. 326 pp. García, L.A y Jiménez, F. (2006). Efectos del bosque De León, L. y Chalar, G. (2003). Abundancia y diver - distribuciónsidad del fitoplancton espacial. Limnetica en el Embalse de Salto cacaracterísticas del río Tascalapa, físico-químicas Honduras. y enRecursos poblaciones Natu- Grande (Argentina-Uruguay). Ciclo estacional y- ralesde macroinvertebrados y Ambiente, acuáticos en la subcuen River, 22(1-2): quality 103-113. moni- - De toringPauw, Nand & Hawkes,control. H.A. (1993). Biological mon tebrates as indicators 48: 35-46. of stream Pollution. Amer. itoring of water quality. En: Gaufin,Publ. A.R. Health & Tarzwell, Rep. C.M. (1952). Aquatic inver W.J. Walley & S. Judd (Eds.). TheUK: Astonphytoplankton University. community 249 pp. as a bioindica- , 67(1): 57-64. Díaz-Pardo, E., Vázquez, G. & López-López, E. (1998). González,nitrogen, E.J. phosphorus& Quirós, R. and(2011). phytoplankton Eutrophication bio of- Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, mass.reservoirs Oecologia in Venezuela: Australis, Relationships between tor of health conditions of Atezca Lake, México. 1: 15(3): 458-475. 257-266. WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 47
- -
Guevara-Cardona, G.; Reinoso-Flórez, G. & Villa-Na Morelli, E. y Verdi, A. (2014). Diversidad de losRevista mac varro, N.F. (2007a). Caddisfly larvae (Insecta: Mexicanaroinvertebrados de Biodiversidad, acuáticos en cursos de agua Trichcotera) of the Coello River Basin in Tolima- con vegetación ribereña de Uruguay. - (Colombia): Spatial and temporal Proceedingpatterns and of 85(4): 1160-1170. thebioecological XIIth International aspects. En: Symposium J. Bueno-Soria, on Trichop R. Bar- Mühlhauser,Arch. Biol. H.A. Med. y Exp.Vila, I. (1987). Eutrofización, im tera.ba-Álvarez & B. Armitage (eds.). pacto en un ecosistema acuático montañoso.Ecolo- - gia de insectos aquâticos, 20: 117-124. do Brasil. Programa de The Caddis Press: 113-120. - Nessimian, J.L & Carvalho, A.H. (Eds.) (1998). - Guevara-Cardona,ture and distribution G.; López-Delgado, of the Trichoptera E.O.; Reinofauna inso-Flórez, a Colombian G. & Villa-Navarro, Andean river N.F. basin (2007b). (Prado, Struc To- Posgrado de Ecologia. Rio de Janeiro: Universi lima) and their relationship to water quality. dad Federal de Rio de Janeiro. 309 pp. - Oliva Martínez, M.G.; Rodríguez Rocha, A.; Lugo age (eds.). Proceeding of the XIIth International Vázquez, A. y Sánchez Rodríguez,Hidrobiologica M.R. (2008). SymposiumEn: J. Bueno-Soria, on Trichoptera. R. Barba-Álvarez & B. Armit Composición y dinámica del fitoplancton en un lago urbano hipertrófico. , 18 (S1):- The Caddis Press: roinvertebrados1-13. bentónicos como indicadores 129-134. Paredes,biológicos C.; Iannacone, de la calidad J. y Alvariño, de agua L.en (2004). dos ríos Mac de Gutiérrez-Fonseca,families. Dugesiana P.E.; Rosas, K.G. & Ramírez, A. Cajamarca y Amazonas, Perú. Rev. Per. Ent. (2013). Aquatic insects of Puerto Rico: a list of indicators of river pollution., 20(2): 215–219. Proc. Linnean. Soc. , 44: Hynes,London, H.B.N. (1959). The use of invertebrates as 107-118. The biology of polluted water. Parra,de estudio. O. (1989). Amb. La y Des. eutroficación de la Laguna 170(2): 165-170. Grande de San Pedro, Concepción, Chile: un caso Hynes, H.B.N. (1963). , 5(1): 117-136. chemistryUK: Liverpool and University trophic statePress, of 202 eight pp. in Cos- Parra, O.; Valdovinos, C.; Urrutia, R.; Cisternas, M.; Jones, J.R.; Lohman,Verh. Internat. K. & Umaña, Verein. G. Limnol., (1993). Water ChileHabit, Central. E. y Mardones, Limnetica M. (2003). Caracterización y tendencias tróficas de cinco lagos costeros de ta Rica. 25(2): stream conditions based, 22(1-2):on a survey 51-83. of Conesto- 899-905. Patrick,R.(1949). A proposed biological measureProc. of Kolkwitz, R. & Marsson, W.A. (1909).Internationale Ökologie der Acad. Nat. Sci. tierischenReveu der gesamtenSaprobien. Hydrobiologie, Beitäge zür Lehre von der ga Basin, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. - biologische Gewäserbeuteilung. ditions. SewagePhiladelphia, Ind. Wastes, 101: 277-341. plant saprobia. Verh. Ges. Oekol. 2: 126-152. Patrick, R. (1950). Biological measure of stream con- Kolkwitz, R. & Marsson,Aquatic Pollution. W.A. (1908). Ecology of- 22: 926-939.Novitates , 26: 505-516. Pérez,Caribea, D. (2015). Entomofauna de Ébano Verde, Cor Laws, A.E. (1981). USA: Wiley In dillera Central, República Dominicana. - terscience Publication. 482 pp. 8: 61-81. López-López, E.; Sedeño-Díaz, J.E.; Ortiz-Ordóñez, Pérez, G. y Roldán, G. (1978). Niveles de contami- (Mexico).E.; Rosas Colmenárez, Rom. J. Biol.-Zool., M. & Abeja Pineda, O. 2010. quia).nación Actualidades por detergentes Biológicas, y su influencia en las Health condition assessment in Lake Xochimilco comunidades bénticas del Río Rionegro (Antio- 55(1): 69-80. rias como factor de toxicidad en 7(24): las aguas 27-36. conti- Matthias, U. y Moreno, H. (1983). Estudio de algunosActuali- Pizzolón,nentales. L. (1996). Interciencia Importancia de las cianobacte dadesparámetros Biológicas físicoquímicos y biológicos del río Medellín y sus principales afluentes. - nutrients, phyto and , zooplankton21(6): 239-245. and relative ment of running 12(46):waters 106-117.based on macroinverte- Quirós, R. (1991). Empirical relationships between- Metcalf, J.L. (1989). Biological water quality assess na. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. Environ. Pollut. fish biomass in lakes and reservoirs of Argenti brate communities: history and present status , 24: 1198-1206. in Europe. , 60: 101-139. 48 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
- - sign and implementation of rapid assessment Quirós,(ed.). R. El (2000). Agua en La Iberoamérica: eutrofización deAcuíferos, las aguas lagos con y Resh,approaches V.H.; Richard, for water H.N. &. resource Barbour, monitoring M.T. (1995). using De embalses.tinentales Ciencia en Argentina. y Tecnología En: A. Fernández-Cirellipara el Desarrol- macroinvertebrates. Aust. J. Ecology, - 20: 108-121.- lo (CYTED). SubprogramaCianobacterias XVII. en Aprovechamien lagos y embalses Reyes,mala. F. Revista (2013). Científica Macroinvertebrados de la Facultad acuáticos de Ciencias de deto deArgentina: Recursos década Hídricos. de los Buenos 80. Serie Aires: de documen 43-47. - Químicaslos cuerpos y Farmacia, lénticos de la Región Maya. Guate Quirós,tos de R. trabajo (2004). del área de Sistemas de Producción - Acuática. dad de las aguas del río23(1): Mucujún 7-16. (estado Méri- - Rincón,da) utilizando J. (1995). Evaluaciónlos macroinvertebrados preliminar de bénticos. la cali Documento N° 2. Departamento de Investigaciones Científicas, Producción. Facultad de Agronomía. Universi - dad de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires. 23 pp. blecimiento de valores de 1(1): bioindicación 33-46. para Quirós, R.; Boveri, M.B.; Petracchi, C.A.; Rennella, A.M.;- Riss, W.; Ospina, R. & Gutiérrez, J.D. (2002). Esta Rosso, J.J.; Sosnovsky, A. y von Bernard, H.T. (2006).- Caldasia Los efectos de la agriculturización del humed- macroinvertebertados acuáticos de la Sabana de al pampeano sobre la eutrofizaciónEutrofização de na sus América lagu Bogotá. , 24(1): 135-156. nas.do Sul: En: Causas, J.G. Tundisi, conseqüências T. Matsumura-Tundisi e tecnologias de& Coge- Rivera, M. y Marrero, C. (1995). Determinación de la rinarenciamento Sidagis Gallie controle. (eds.). Instituto Internacional de calidad de lasBiollania aguas en las cuencas hidrográficas - mediante la utilización del Índice de Integridad comoBiótica indicadores (IIB). de la 11: calidad 127-148. de aguas. Cultura Ecologia, Instituto Internacional de Ecologia e Ge Rocha,Científica Z. (2004). Los macroinvertebrados acuáticos renciamento Ambiental, Academia Brasileira de Guía para el estudio de los mac- InternationalCiências, Conselho Issues, Nacional InterAmerican de Desenvolvimento Network of roinvertebrados, 2: 34-40. acuáticos del Departamento Científico e Tecnológico, InterAcademy Panel on Roldán,de Antioquia. G. (1988). - - - Academies of Sciences. São Carlos: 1-16. Fondo FEN-Colombia-Concien Quiroz Castelán, H.; Mora Zúñiga, L.M.; Molina As cias-Universidad de Antioquia. Santafé de Bo- tudillo, I. y García Rodríguez, J. (2004). Variación orgotá: como Editorial indicadores Presencia de laLtda. calidad del agua. Re- Actade los Universitaria, organismos fitoplanctónicos y la calidad Roldán,vista G.de (1999). la Academia Los macroinvertebrados Colombiana de Ciencias y su val Ex- del agua en el Lago de ContaminaciónChapala, Jalisco, y México. eutro- actas Físicas y Naturales, fización del agua. Impactos14(1): 47-58. del modelo de agri- Estudio limnológico de los recursos RAP-ALcultura Uruguay industrial. (2010). hídricos del parque de Piedras23(88): Blancas. 375-387. Academia Roldán, G. (2001). - Red de Acción en Plaguicidas y sus Alternativas para América Latina (RAP- Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Natu- types.AL). Montevideo: Limnology andRAP-AL. Oceanography, 36 pp. rales. Colección Jorge Álvarez Lleras N° 9. Rawson, D.S. (1956). Algal indicators of trophic lakes Roldán, G. (2002). LimnologíaEl yagua eutrofización en Iberoamérica. de em río Combeima, Colombia. Revista de 1(1): la Asocia18-25. - Debalses la Limnología en Colombia. a la En: Gestión A. Fernández-Cirelli en Sudamérica. Pro y G.- Reinoso,ción Colombiana G. (1999). Estudio de Ciencias de laBiológicas, fauna béntica del Chalar-Marquiságrama Iberoamericano (Eds.). de Ciencia y Tecnología - - 11: 35-44. - Reinoso,los macroinvertebrados G.; Guevara, G.; Vejarano, y de la M.; calidad García, del J. agua.y Vil tudiospara el TransdisciplinariosDesarrollo, CYTED XVII. del Agua; Aprovechamien Facultad de Revistala, F. (2008). de la Evaluación Asociación delColombiana río Prado de a partir Ciencias de to y Gestión de Recursos Hídricos; Centro de Es- Biológicas, Ciencias VeterinariasLa bioindicación de la Universidad de la calidad de Bue del 20(1): 102-116. nosagua Aires. en Colombia. Buenos Aires: 107-122. - Rejmánková, E.; Komárek,Limnologica J.; Dix, M.; Komárková, J. Roldán, G. (2003). & Girón, N. 2011. Cyanobacterial blooms in Lake Medellín: Editorial Universi Atitlán, Guatemala. , 41: 296-302. dad de Antioquia. 170 pp. WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 49
nación de la calidad ambiental de las aguas de - Roldán,y doméstica G.; Builes, sobre J.J.; la Trujillo, fauna béntica C.M. y del Suárez, río Me A.- - dellín.(1973). Actualidades Efectos de laBiológicas, contaminación industrial los ríos de El Salvador, utilizando invertebra- Fundamentos de dos acuáticos: índice Formulación biológico a nivelde una de guía fa Limnología Neotropical. 2(5): 54-64. - metodológicamilias de invertebrados estandarizada acuáticos para determinar en El Salva la Roldán, G. y Ramírez, J.J. (2008). calidaddor (IBF-SV-2010). ambiental deEn: las aguas de los ríos de El 2ª edición. Medellín: Ed Salvador utilizando insectos acuáticos. Proyecto itorial Universidad de Antioquia. 440 pp. Roldán, G.; Zúñiga, M. del C.; Zamora, H.; Álvarez, L.F.; Reinoso, G. y Longo, M. (2014).Diversidad, Capítulo con de- Universidad de El Salvador (UES)-Organización servaciónColombia. y En: uso P. de Alonso-Eguíalis, los macroinvertebrados J.M. Mora, dul B.- de los Estados Americanos (OEA). San Salvador:- ceacuícolasCampbell y deM. México,Springer Centroamérica, (Eds.). Colombia, SINAI Editores e Impresores, S.A. de C.V. 43 pp. Cuba y Puerto Rico. Springer,Revista M.; de Ramírez,Biología Tropical,A. y Hanson, P. (2010). Mac Manual de Métodos roinvertebrados de agua dulce de Costa Rica I.- en Limnología. México: IMTA. - ológicos para el diagnóstico 58 del (Supl. estado 4): de97-136. con- Rueda-Delgado, G. (Ed.) (2002). Tabash,taminación F.A. (1988). de las Utilización aguas lóticas. de indicadoresUniciencia bi Asociación Colombiana de Lim nología. Santafé de Bogotá: Pen Clips Publicidad , 5(1- y Diseño Ltda. - 2): 87-89. Guidelines of Lake Management. Salvatierra, T. (2012). Los macroinvertebrados- Tundisi, J.G. (1988). Management of reservoirs in acuáticos como indicadores biológicos de la cal Brazil. En: Vol. 1.- idad del agua en el rio Gil González y tributari- Principles of Lake Management. S.E. Jorgensen & os más importantes en Nicaragua.Revista Centro Universidad para la R.A. Vollenweider (eds.). International Lake En yInvestigación Ciencia, en Recursos Acuáticos de Nicara vironment Committee (ILEC) & United Nations- gua (CIRA/UNAN) ENITEL. Environment Programme (UNEP). Shiga: 155-169. 6(9): 38-46. Umaña,(eds.). G.; Limnology Haberyan, in K.A. Developing & Horn, S.P.Countries (1999). 2.Lim In- Sánchez-Herrera, M.J. (2005). El índice biológico ternationalnology in Costa Association Rica. En: of R.G. Theoretical Wetzel & B.and Gopal Ap- delBMWP río Pamplonita, (Biological MonitoringNorte de Santanter. Working Bistua: Party Revistascore), modificadode la Facultad y adaptado de Ciencias al cauce Básicas, principal plied Limnology Evaluación (SIL). International de las condiciones Scientific 3(2):- biológicasPublications. de Newlos cuerpos Delhi: 33-62.de agua utilizando los dos54-67. bentónicos como indicadores de la condi- Valencia,macroinvertebrados E. (2014). bentónicos. Segnini,ción ecológica S. (2003). de El los uso cuerpos de los de macroinvertebra agua corriente. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente y Aguas. Ecotrópicos La Paz, Bolivia:- - ación de la calidad 16(2): 45-63. del agua en ríos de los Andes Vásquez-Ramos,y agricultura enJ.M.; cuencas Guevara-Cardona, con bosque G.seco y Reino tropi- Segnini, S.; Correa, I. y Chacón, M. (2009). Evalu so-Flórez, G. (2013). Impactos de la urbanización Enfoques y temáticas en entomología. Arrivillla- de larvas de tricópteros. Revista de la Asociación Venezolanos usando el índice biótico BMWP. En:- Colombianacal: Influencia de sobre Ciencias la composición Biológicas, y estructura
ga, A., M. El Souki y B. Herrera (eds.). XXI Con 25: 61-70. greso Venezolano de Entomología. Maracaibo:- Vásquez-Ramos, J.M.; Guevara, G. y Reinoso-Flórez, Sociedad Venezolana de Entomología, 40 pp. - enG. (2014).cuencas Factores con bosque ambientales seco tropical asociados (Tolima, con Co la- Sermeño Chicas, J.M.; Serrano Cervantes, L.; Spring lombia).preferencia Revista de hábitatde Biología de larvas Tropical, de tricópteros er, M.; Paniagua Cienfuegos, M.R.; Pérez, D.; Ri- vas Flores, A.W.; Menjivar Rosa, R.A.; Bonilla de 62: 21-40. Torres, D.L.; Carranza Estrada, F.A.; Flores Ten Vázquez Silva, G.; Castro Mejía, G.; González Mora, I.;- sos, J.M.; González, C.; Gutiérrez Fonseca, P.E.;- minarPérez Rodríguez,la calidad del R. agua.y Castro ContactoS Barrera, 60 T. (2006). Hernández Martínez, M.A.; Monterrosa Urías, Bioindicadores como herramientas para deter A.J. y Arias de Linares, A.Y. (2010). Determi : 41-48. 50 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Guide- Caudal am- lines for drinking-water quality: Fourth edi- biental: Conceptos Experiencias y Desafíos. Pro- Worldtion Healthincorporating Organization the first (WHO) addendum. (2017). Carvajal y L. Castro (Compiladores).
Ginebra: grama Editorial de la Universidad del Valle, Cali, comunidadesWHO. 541 pp. de macroinvertebrados dulcea- ecologíaColombia: del 303-310. orden Plecoptera (Insecta) en Co- Zamora,cuícolas H. en (1996). el Departamento Aspectos bioecológicos del Cauca. Unicau de las- Zúñiga,lombia, M. delcon C.énfasis (2010). en Diversidad, Anacroneuria distribución (Perlidae). y ca Ciencia, Momentos de Cien- cia, para la evaluación 1: 1-11. biológica de la calidad de las Universidad de la Amazonía. - Zamora,aguas H.epicontinentales (2000). Adaptación en Colombia. del índice Unicauca BMWP 7(2): 101-112. Ciencia, Zúñiga,Environmental M. del C. & Flow:Cardona, Concepts, W. (2009). Experiences Water qual and Challenges.ity and environmental flow bioindicators. En: 4: 47-59. Zamora, H. (2002). Análisis biogeográfico de los Cali, Colombia: Del Valle University.- Revistamacroinvertebrados de la Asociación acuáticos Colombiana epicontinentales de Ciencias dicadorespp. 167-198. ambientales de calidad de agua en la Biológicas,(MAE) en el Departamento del Cauca, Colombia. Zúñiga, M. del C.; Rojas, A.M.Revista y Caicedo, de la Asociación G. (1993). In de Ingenieros Sanitarios de Antioquia-AINSA, dos ecosistemas 14(1): 37-64.lóticos afectados por aguas re- cuenca del Río Cauca. Zamora,siduales H. yde Sarria, rallanderías H. (2001). de yucaCalidad mediante biológica la uti de- 13(2): 17-28. Zúñiga, M. del C.; Rojas, A.M. & Mosquera, S. (1997). aplicaciónlización de de sus los macroinvertebradosíndices de Shannon-Weaver acuáticos y Biological aspect of EphemeropteraEphemeroptera in rivers of como bioindicadores,Unicauca Ciencia, comparando además la andsouthwestern Plecoptera Colombiabiology, ecology (South and América). systematics. En: P. Landolt & M. Sartori (eds.). - BMWP. 6: 21-42. - Zúñiga, M. del C. (2009). Bioindicadores de calidad MTL, Mauron Tinguely y Lachat S.A., Switzer de agua y caudal ambiental: Caso del Río Melén land: 261-268. dez (Valle del Cauca, Colombia). En: J. Cantera, Y. WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 51
Use of New Methodologies in Monitoring and Zoning Water Bodies in Argentina
César Luis García, Carlos Catalini and Carlos Marcelo García
In order to illustrate the use of new technologies, it was decided to take a real case that re-
cently took place in Argentina. During the month of April 2017, the city of Villa Carlos Paz,- nobacterialin the Province blooms of Córdoba, of the genus was Microcistysforced to declare spp. (Figure an Environmental 1). This problem, Emergency although due not to new the foradvanced this waterbody, state of eutrophication has achieved anof thealarming San Roque periodicity, Reservoir, which which implies caused a high outcrops potential or cya de- gree of danger for collective health.
solution (in the next few years), it is essential for the municipal government to at least mon- itor Givenand zone the therecurrent water mirrornature andof the its phenomenonmain tributaries and on the a regularimpossibility basis inof ordera short-term to zone the various recreational activities developed in it, in order to prevent health problems for both residents and tourists. In addition to being important for the tourist development of Villa Carlos Paz, one should recall that this reservoir is the main source of drinking wa-
inhabitants). ter ofAchieving the second the largestobjective population of developing in Argentina a system (thethat citywill ofmake Córdoba it possible with toover monitor 1,300,000 the state of proliferation of algae and create alerts for severe events that occur as a result, an -
•interdisciplinary Have information approach on the has status been ofproposed, the reservoir which and will its allow tributaries the creation by monitoring of an Experi the mental Monitoring and Remediation Laboratory that will make it possible to: - - quality and quantity of water from Lake San Roque and its tributaries, as well as adapt • Periodicallying methodologies zone the to identifytributaries the andsurface the coverreservoir of algae, based using on state satellite indicators images as and a toolUn formanned making Aerial quick Vehicles decisions (UAV). regarding their use for recreation or navigation. Issuance of early warnings in extreme cases. • Perform in-situ experimentation to evaluate the mitigation and remediation methods - tion alternatives and control bloom events, which are dangerous for society. suggested in the local system and determine the costs/benefits of the various mitiga
César Luis García CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina. Carlos Catalini Director of the Semi-Arid Region Center, INA, Argentina. Carlos Marcelo García. Director of CETA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. 52 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
a. Detection of algal blooms using remote sensors
It is possible to monitor algal blooms with biomass cesses that take place in waterbodies. This involves measurement, examining the species present. One measuring a property of an object of interest from of the indicators normally used is the concentra- a distance, such as a sensor on board a satellite or tion of chlorophyll-a. Peak values of the latter for , et al - -1. a UAV. Itan has oligotrophic been shown lake by are the approximately specialized literature 1 to 10 μg that 1-1 throughGermán remote . (2017)sensors, have using implemented images theobtained mon thewhereas temporal in a eutrophicand spatial lake, frequencies it can reach of 300 conven μg 1 - itoring of algal blooms in the San Roque Reservoir-
to report changes in the biomass of phytoplankton, through the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectro especiallytional water during sampling bloom programs conditions, are when not sufficient the spa- topradiomenter of the atmosphere (MODIS) andsensor images on board of the theOperation TERRA- tial and temporal variability in the density of phyto- satellite, specifically the reflectance product at the plankton is particularly high. This is where remote sensing is a fundamental tool for complementing al Land Imager (OLI) sensor on board the Landsat traditional monitoring and understanding the pro- and8 satellite. measure The their authors intensity can observe(Figure 2various). bloom events during the spring-summer 2016-2017 season,
Figure 1. Entry of the San Antonio River into the body of the San Roque Reservoir, Villa Carlos Paz WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES 53
Figure 2. Calculation of NDVI for different dates in the San Roque Reservoir
et al., 2017.
Source: Germán b. Estimation of surface velocities with the LSPIV technique and using UAV video - national organizations represented by the Nation- vial or lentic, such as a reservoir or lagoon, makes it possibleThe presence to use of the tracers Particle in a Image waterbody, Velocimetry whether (PIV) flu procedure. However, because of considerations of al University of Córdoba and its Water Technology scale, this technique, commonly used in labora- Center (CETA) and the National Water Institute and theits Center diffuser for system the Semi-Arid installed Region in reducing (INA-CIRSA). the eutro- - phicationThe objective of the lake,was towhich evaluate causes the the efficiency prolifera of- tories combined with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles tion of algae in the water mirror. The system com- (UAV), makes it possible to use a similar method prises seven lines of pipes with small perforations, ology on surfaces with an approximate area of 5000 through which air is injected. They are placed in m², Anwhich example resulted of the in the use Large-Scale of a combination PIV technique of these the deepest zone, one meter away from the bot- techniquesor LSPIV-Large with Scale traditional Particle methodologiesImage Velocimetry. is the tom. One of the lines is placed in the direction of the monitoring of the air diffusers installed in the San gorge while the rest are directed towards the cen- tral area of the dike. the Municipality of Villa Carlos Paz, the Province of In theory, it is hoped to increase the circulation Roque Reservoir. Other participants included both- of water at the bottom of the lake by homogenizing the temperature, which is achieved by breaking the Córdoba through the Secretariat of Water Resourc es, the River Patrol and other agencies, as well as 54 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
tracers thrown onto the water body to determine evident during the spring and summer months. thermalThe mechanism,stratification, the which only oneis considerably of its kind used more in Referencesthe flow lines. time that monitoring the effectiveness of the sys- temthe country, was proposed. was installed For this in reason, 2008. This technicians was the firstand - municipal and provincial civil servants were joined - Germán, A.; Ferral, A.; Romero Arijon, D.; and Ber - nasconi, I. (2017). Detección y caracterización de- by CETA personnel and those from the areas of Lim floraciones algales en el embalse SanAnales Roque de a multi-parametricnology and Water probes Quality, to Geomorphology, measure the dissolved togeth resúmenespartir de Sensores de XVI CONAGUA. Remotos. XXVI Congreso Na er with INA-CIRSA support personnel, who used cional del Agua. September 20 to 23. Volume I. 1st Edition. oxygen, as well as UAV to track the biodegradable Editorial Universitas. ISBN 978-987-4029-23-2 Figure 3. Monitoring the effectiveness of aeration diffusers in the San Roque Reservoir - LSPIV WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | ARGENTINA 55
Argentina
Argentina, which faces a greater challenge regarding water quality than water shortage, must make a great effort to achieve 100% safe water coverage in the shortest possible time and significantly increase urban sanitation, including treatment prior to discharge into the receiving bodies. It is also necessary to increase controls to minimize the generation of industrial pollutants, reduce the use of harmful herbicides and promote agricultural reuse with treated residual liquids.
Potrerillos reservoir in Mendoza, Argentina © iStock 56 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | ARGENTINA
On the subject of water quality in the Americas: Argentina
Luis E. Higa, Emilio J Lentini, José María Regueira, Melina Tobías and Raúl A. Lopardo
1. Introduction
1.1 General framework
In Argentina, the supply of surface water resources is estimated to have an average flow of thisapproximately would yield 26,000 an annual m³/s (INCyTH,amount of 1994, renewable Pochat, water 2005). resources Since the perpopulation person reportedof approxi in- the 2010 National Population, Household and Housing Census (INDEC, 2012) was 40,117,096,
mately 20,500 m³/inhabitant/year, much higher than the 1,700 m³/inhabitant/year adopted- as water stress or the Falkenmark Index” (White, 2012). However, this average availability does not accurately reflect the actual supply of sur face water in the country, since its geographic distributionet al is markedly unequal. Thus, 85% ofoccupy these the water remaining resources two are thirds, located with in thethe aridPlata zone Basin, representing whose surface half area the total is only area one (SDSy third- of the mainland area (INCyTH, 1994, Rodríguez ., 2008), while semi-arid and arid areas Moreover, in order to assess the actual availability, the very different population densi- PA, 2002).
perty in inhabitant the various than river the basins water muststress be limit. taken Accordingly, into account groundwater (INDEC, 2012). resources In this are respect, crucial key to Argentine provinces (such as Tucumán and Córdoba) have lower annual water availability In Argentina, the main consumption of water corresponds to irrigation, accounting for reducing this deficit, in the arid and semi-arid regions of the country, Table 1 shows the estimated val- nearly 70% of the total water extracted. The remainder is distributed among the other three- maincagno uses: et al human, livestock and industrial consumption. ues of the consumption of the water extracted in the country between 1993 and 1997 (Cal ., 2000).
Luis E. Higa. [email protected] National Institute of Water, Ezeiza. Emilio J Lentini. [email protected] Secretariat of Infrastructure and Water Policy. José María Regueira. [email protected] Secretariat of Infrastructure and Water Policy/Regional UTN Buenos Aires. Melina Tobías. [email protected] National Council of Scientific and Technical Research/ UBA Gino Germani Research Institute. Raúl A. Lopardo. [email protected] Chapter Coordinator. National Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences/UNLP. WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | ARGENTINA 57
Table 1. Water Extractions by use and source between 1993 and 1997 Surface water Ground water Total
Water uses 106 m3/year % of total 106 m3/year % of total 106 m3/year % of use water used water used compared to total extracted Irrigation
18,000 75 6,000 25 24,000 71 Municipal Livestock 1,000 34 2,000 66 3,000 9 Industrial 3,500 78 1,000 22 4,500 13 Total 24,0001,500 ---60 10,0001,000 ---40 34,0002,500 1007 et al
Source: Calcagno ., 2000.
The implementation of the National Water Plan clean, and the transportation and removal of excre- - at of Water Infrastructure and Policy (formerly the diseases are the third leading cause of death among (PNA), prepared in 2016 by the current1 Secretariis based ta. According to the WHO (WHO, 2015), diarrheal - them die annually due to diarrheal diseases result- terUndersecretariat for production, of ii) Waterensuring Resources), drinking water and the under 5s. It is estimated that over 340,000 of sewerage,on four central iii) adapting areas, namely: to climate i) guaranteeingextremes, and wa iv) - creating matter and energy from biomass will sure- lioning from children poor suffer sanitation, from stunting amounting or chronic to nearly malnu 1,000- tritionchildren to a the day. lack It also of water, attributes sanitation the fact and that hygiene. 161 mil ly1.2 modify Drinking these water proportions and sewerage(SIPH, 2017). annual deaths could have been prevented by im- provingAccording water, tosanitation the same and report, hygiene. in 2015, It also 842,000 notes and treatment) is crucial to the health of the popu- lation.Basic sanitation Around the (safe world, water the numberand excreta of people collection who - lack access to safely managed drinking water totals tosomiasis,that deficiencies trachoma in water, and helminthiases, sewerage and affecting hygiene contribute significantly to diseases such as schis- - Shortcomings2.1 billion, while in thosebasic withoutsanitation adequate claim the sanitation lives of more than 1.5 billion people a year. It should be not services amount to 4.5 billion (WHO/UNICEF, 2017).- perioded that agreedthese alarming by the countries figures are that updated signed WHO the Mil es- timates for 2015, in other words,2 at the end of the overfrom fivewater-borne million people diseases. annually. Sixty perMoreover, cent of itdeaths is es The crucial importance of water and sewerage in timated that approximately 2.3 billion people suffer lennium Development Goals. diseases caused by the water they consume. - of childrenWater for under human 5 due consumption to parasitic isand not infectious only es- human development has been recognized by the UN- sential as drinking water, but also for personal hy- through Resolution 58/217, which declares the peri giene and food preparation. In addition, in the case od from 2005-2015 the International Decade for Ac of dwellings that have a sanitation system with a recognizedtion: "Water water for life”. and Moreover, sewerage on as July a human 28, 2010, right. at the connection to mains sewerage or septic tank dis- United Nations Plenary Session, Resolution 64/292, charge or cesspits, water is used for keeping toilets -
2. The MDGs were set at the Millennium Summit in 2010, orga things- the vital importance of both services was recognized nized by the United Nations Assembly, where -among other - 1. Through the Decree of the National Executive Power No. 174 of sources of the Nation was raised to the rank of Secretariat, and who lacked access to drinking water and basic sanitation or who March 2, 2018, the agency of the Undersecretariat of Water Re and by 2015, countries pledged to halve the proportion of people renamed as the Secretariat of Infrastructure and Water Policy. were unable to afford it. 58 WATER QUALITY IN THE AMERICAS | ARGENTINA
Figure 1. Drinking water coverage by type of source (2010)